JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

The clinical microfluidic chip is an important biomedical analysis technique that simplifies clinical patient blood sample preprocessing and immunofluorescently stains circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in situ on the chip, allowing the rapid detection and identification of a single CTC.

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are significant in cancer prognosis, diagnosis, and anti-cancer therapy. CTC enumeration is vital in determining patient disease since CTCs are rare and heterogeneous. CTCs are detached from the primary tumor, enter the blood circulation system, and potentially grow at distant sites, thus metastasizing the tumor. Since CTCs carry similar information to the primary tumor, CTC isolation and subsequent characterization can be critical in monitoring and diagnosing cancer. The enumeration, affinity modification, and clinical immunofluorescence staining of rare CTCs are powerful methods for CTC isolation because they provide the necessary elements with high sensitivity. Microfluidic chips offer a liquid biopsy method that is free of any pain for the patients. In this work, we present a list of protocols for clinical microfluidic chips, a versatile CTC isolating platform, that incorporate a set of functionalities and services required for CTC separation, analysis, and early diagnosis, thus facilitating biomolecular analysis and cancer treatment. The program includes rare tumor cell counting, clinical patient blood preprocessing, which includes red blood cell lysis, and the isolation and recognition of CTCs in situ on microfluidic chips. The program allows the precise enumeration of tumor cells or CTCs. Additionally, the program includes a tool that incorporates CTC isolation with versatile microfluidic chips and immunofluorescence identification in situ on the chips, followed by biomolecular analysis.

Introduction

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are significant in cancer prognosis, diagnosis, and anti-cancer therapy. CTC enumeration is vital since CTCs are rare and heterogeneous. The enumeration, affinity modification, and clinical immunofluorescence staining of rare CTCs are powerful techniques for CTC isolation because they offer the necessary elements with high sensitivity1. Rare number of tumor cells mixed with normal blood closely mimics real patient blood since 2-3 mL of real patient blood only contains 1-10 CTCs. To solve a critical experimental problem, instead of using a large number of tumor cells introduced in PBS or mixed with normal blood, the use of rare number of tumor cells provides us with a low number of blood cells, which is closer to reality when performing an experiment.

Cancer is the leading cause of death in the world2. CTCs are tumor cells shed from the original tumor that circulate in the blood and lymphatic circulation systems3. When CTCs move to a new survivable environment, they grow as a second tumor. This is called metastasis and is responsible for 90% of deaths in cancer patients4. CTCs are vital for prognosis, early diagnosis, and for understanding the mechanisms of cancer. However, CTCs are extremely rare and heterogeneous in patient blood5,6.

Microfluidic chips offer a liquid biopsy that does not invade the tumor. They have the advantage of being portable, low cost, and having a cell-matched scale. The isolation of CTCs with microfluidic chips is classified mainly into two types: affinity-based, which relies on antigen-antibody binding7,8,9 and is the original and most widely used method of CTC isolation; and physical-based chips, which utilize size and deformability differences between tumor cells and blood cells10,11,12,13,14,15, are label-free, and are easy to operate. The advantage of microfluidic chips over alternative techniques is that the physical-based approach of big-ellipse microfilters firmly captures CTCs with high capture efficiency. The reason for this is that ellipse microposts are organized into slim tunnels of line-line gaps. The line-line gaps are different from the traditional point-point gaps formed by microposts such as rhombus microposts. Wave chip-based capturing of CTCs combines both physical property-based and affinity-based isolation. Wave chip-based capture involves 30 wave-shaped arrays with the antibody of anti-EpCAM coated on circular microposts. The CTCs are captured by the small gaps, and the big gaps are used to accelerate the flow rate. The missed CTCs have to pass the small gaps in the next array and are captured by the affinity-based isolation integrated inside the chip16.

The goal of the protocol is to demonstrate the counting of rare numbers of tumor cells and the clinical analysis of CTCs with microfluidic chips. The protocol describes the CTC isolation steps, how to obtain a low number of tumor cells, the clinical physical separation of small-ellipse filters, big-ellipse filters, and trapezoid filters, affinity modification, and enrichment17.

Protocol

Patient blood samples were supplied by Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Medical University.The protocol follows the guidelines of Peking University Third Hospital's human research ethics committee. Informed consent was obtained from the patients for using the samples for research purposes.

1. Pre-experiment to check the capture efficiency with cultured tumor cells

  1. Culture the tumor cells MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and HeLa for determining the capture efficiency. Dilute the tumor cell suspension, count the number of tumor cells, and repeat until the desired number of cells in 1 mL of PBS is obtained.
    1. Culture the cells in a cell culture flask with a starting cell number of ~ 1 x 105 cells in 1 mL of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. Incubate in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C with a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
    2. When the cell lines grow as adherent monolayers to 95% confluence, detach them from the culture dishes with 0.25% trypsin solution for 2 min as described in Chen et al.16.
    3. Stain the tumor cells with calcein AM. Put 3 µL of calcein AM in the culture dish, and keep the dish in the incubator for 30 min. Then,digest all the cells with trypsin.
    4. Count the cultured tumor cells in PBS with a cell counting chamber, and dilute until 100 tumor cells per 1 mL of PBS are obtained.
      NOTE: In order to precisely enumerate cell number, take 50 µL of the obtained cell suspension to see whether the number of tumor cells in it is five or not with a microscope. Decide the volume of cell suspension that needs to be taken to obtain 100 tumor cells according to the actual number of tumor cells in 50 µL of cell suspension.
  2. Introduce the cell suspension containing 100 tumor cells per 1 mL of PBS into the microfluidic chip using a syringe with a syringe pump at varied flow rates of 0.5 mL/h, 1 mL/h, 2 mL/h, 3 mL/h, 4 mL/h, and 5 mL/h. Obtain the capture efficiency for the various flow rates, and determine the optimal flow rate.
    1. Count the number of tumor cells captured on the chip and flowing out from the outlet. Calculate the capture efficiency as below:
      ​Capture efficiency = Number of cells captured/(Number of cells captured + number of cells flowing out) × 100%
    2. Repeat to obtain the capture efficiency for different numbers of tumor cells from 10 to 100 (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100).
  3. Test and validate the microfluidic chip for rare numbers of tumor cells. Inject these 10 sample suspensions into the microfluidic chips using a hollow needle made with a micropipette puller to aspirate 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 tumor cells diluted in 1 mL of PBS. Detect and enumerate the number of tumor cells for each sample after their capture on the chip.
    NOTE: The hollow needle is around 3 cm in length with a 1 mm external diameter.
  4. Perform clinical pre-experiment testing for tumor cells spiked into normal blood samples.
    1. Stain the tumor cells with calcein AM, and then enumerate 100 tumor cells in 5 µL of PBS. Spike these cells into 1 mL of whole normal blood samples. Introduce these cells into the chip, and enumerate the number of tumor cells captured on the chip with green immunofluorescence. Perform in vivo enumeration on the chip as described above, and calculate the capture efficiency after capture.
    2. Repeat step 1.4.1 for nine additional concentrations of tumor cell numbers from 10 to 90 (10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90).
    3. Enumerate 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 tumor cells as described in step 1.3 without staining, spike into 1 mL of whole normal blood, introduce these samples into the microfluidic chip, and capture the tumor cells on the chip.
    4. Stain on the chip with Hoechst, CK-FITC, and CD45-PE. Put 3-5 µL of fluorescent dye into 20-30 µL of PBS, and then introduce this solution onto the microfluidic chip with a syringe. Enumerate the number of tumor cells captured on the chip with both blue and green immunofluorescence to determine the capture efficiency.
  5. Perform modification of the microfluidic chip for the affinity-based capture of anti-EpCAM.
    NOTE: Since the wave chip combines both affinity-based and physical property-based isolation, modify the chip with agents.
    1. Modify the surface of the chip with 100 µL of 4% (v/v) 3-mercaptopropyl trimethoxysilane in ethanol at room temperature for 45 min. Introduce this solution into the chip carefully and slowly in case it destroys the internal structure of the chip, especially the bonding of the top surface and substrate glass.
      NOTE: The chip surface is modified using mercaptosilane. The interactions that occur on the chip are determined by chemical bonds. Chemical bonds are established to realize the bonding of the antibody modified with the antigen. Various reagents are modified inside the chip to establish chemical bonds that connect with each other. The last reagent to be modified is an anti-epithelial adhesion molecule (anti-EpCAM). The tumor cell surface antigen of EpCAM combines with anti-EpCAM inside the chip to realize the capture of the CTCs.
    2. Wash with ethanol 3x. Add 100 µL of the coupling agent N-y-maleimidobutyryloxy succinimide ester (GMBS, 1 µM) onto the chip, and allow it to interact for 30 min.
    3. Wash with PBS 3x. Use a syringe to introduce 1 mL of PBS onto the chip to wash.
    4. Treat the chip with 30-40 µL of 10 µg/mL neutravidin at room temperature for 30 min, leading to immobilization of the cells onto the GMBS, and then flush with PBS to remove excess avidin.
    5. Modify the chip with 3 µL of anti-biotinylated EpCAM antibody at a concentration of 10 µg/mL in 100 µL of PBS with 1% (w/v) BSA. Keep this overnight.

2. Clinical experiment on the chip to enumerate the circulating tumor cells (CTCs)

  1. Pre-process clinical cancer patient blood samples using red blood cells lysis (RBCL) solution, or introduce 2-3 mL of the blood sample directly onto the microfluidic chip using a syringe.
    1. Perform pre-processing, which takes around 30 min. Collect whole blood samples in anticoagulation tubes. Add 6-9 mL of RBS lysis solution into 2-3 mL of blood. Centrifuge at 111 x g for 5-8 min at room temperature, and discard the upper layer of red clear liquid.
  2. Capture, stain, recognize, and enumerate the cells on the chip as described below.
    1. Capture the cells on the chip as described in step 1.Stain the chip for the CTCs captured using Hoechst, CK-FITC, and CD45-PE. CK-FITC is a specific stain for tumor cells, and CD45-PE is for white blood cells.
    2. Add 3 µL of CK-FITC to 20 µL of PBS. Introduce this into the syringe, and pump the diluted CK-FITC onto the chip. Allow to stain for 30 min. Introduce 300 µL of PBS onto the chip to wash the chip.
    3. Add 3 µL of CD45-PE to 20 µL of PBS. Introduce this into the syringe, and pump the diluted CD45-PE onto the chip. Allow to stand for 30 min. Introduce 300 µL of PBS onto the chip to wash the chip.
    4. Identify the CTCs with an inverted fluorescence microscope at 20x or 40x magnification. CTCs emit both blue and green fluorescence, and white blood cells (WBCs) emit both blue and red fluorescence. Identify the CTCs with both blue and green fluorescence and the WBCs with both blue and red fluorescence.
    5. From the immunofluorescence images, enumerate the number of CTCs captured on the chip. Enumerate the CTCs as Hoechst+/CK-FITC+/CD45− and the WBCs as Hoechst+/CK-FITC−/CD45+.
  3. Enrich the captured CTCs by flushing with PBS through the syringe in the reverse direction onto the microfluidic chip to collect the CTCs captured on the chip from the inlet. Use a syringe with 1 mL of PBS, introduce it from the outlet to enrich the CTCs captured on the chip within 2-3 min, and collect them from the inlet. Use 1 mL of PBS for each washing step, and repeat 3x.
  4. Stain the tumor cells or CTCs captured on the microfluidic chip as described below.
    1. Stain using calcein AM. Add 5 µL of calcein AM to 20 µL of PBS, stain the cells for 30 min, then centrifuge at 111 x g for 2 min at room temperature to obtain tumor cells, and suspend in 1 mL of PBS.
    2. To identify the cellular nuclei, add 20 µL of DAPI solution (10 µL of DAPI reagent in 20 µL of PBS) to the chip at the optimal flow rate of 1 mL/h for big-ellipse microfilters and 1.5 mL/h for trapezoid ones. Pass through 20 µL of anti-cytokeratin stock solution (3 µL of anti-cytokeratin antibody in 20 µL of PBS) to react with the chip for 30 min.
    3. Stain the WBCs captured on the chip. After the CTCs have been captured on the chip, add 25 µL of anti-CD45 antibody solution (5 µL of anti-CD45 solution in 20 µL of PBS) to the chip, and allow to stain for 30 min. Wash with PBS, and identify the epithelial cells with both blue and green fluorescence.
  5. Perform immunofluorescence identification with fluorescence microscopy as described below.
    1. Use a fluorescence microscope and excite the sample with the blue laser. Find the cells emitting blue fluorescence, which are nucleate cells. Use one of the following magnifications: 10x, 20x, or 40x. Find a clear field for the tumor cell. For the blue laser source, use an excitation plate wavelength of 420-485 nm and an emission plate wavelength of 515 nm.
    2. Without moving the samples, use another laser source. Rotate the fluorescence microscope and excite the sample with the green laser. Find the cells emitting green fluorescence, which is indicative of tumor cells. Take images of the same field with the same magnification with this green laser source. The cells that emit both blue and green fluorescence are recognized as tumor cells. For the green laser source, use an excitation plate wavelength of 460-550 nm and an emission plate wavelength of 590 nm
    3. Without moving the samples, use another laser source. Rotate the fluorescence microscope and excite the sample with the red laser. Find the cells emitting red fluorescence. Take images of the same field with the same magnification with this red laser source. The cells that emit both blue and red fluorescence are recognized as white blood cells.
    4. Save the image for obtained by using each of the laser sources above. Take several images of the same field with different colored lights.
    5. Use ultraviolet light with an excitation plate wavelength of 330-400 nm and an emission plate wavelength of 425 nm. Use purple light with an excitation plate wavelength of 395-415 nm and an emission plate wavelength of 455 nm.
  6. Calculate the capture efficiency as in step 1.2.1.

Results

The whole setup includes a syringe pump, a syringe, and a microfluidic chip. The cell suspension in the syringe is connected to the syringe pump, and the cell suspension is introduced into the microfluidic chip to capture the cells. The capture efficiency for all the microfluidic chips utilized was around 90% or above. For the wave chip, we designed microstructures with varied gaps. The small gaps are used to capture the CTCs, and the big gaps are used to accelerate the flow rate. The cell suspension flows quickly in the...

Discussion

The prognosis and early diagnosis of cancer have a significant effect on cancer treatment1. CTC isolation with microfluidic chips offers a liquid biopsy with no invasion. However, CTCs are extremely rare and heterogeneous in the blood1, which makes it challenging to isolate CTCs. CTCs have similar properties to the original tumor sources from which they originate. Thus, CTCs play a vital role in cancer metastasis1.

The pr...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This research work was supported by the Anhui Natural Science Foundation of China (1908085MF197, 1908085QB66), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21904003), the Scientific Research Project of Tianjin Education Commission (2018KJ154), the Provincial Natural Science Research Program of Higher Education Institutions of Anhui Province (KJ2020A0239), and the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, East China Key Laboratory of Multidimensional Information Processing, East China Normal University (MIP20221).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Calcein AMBIOTIUM80011
calibrated microcapillary pipettesSigma- AldrichP0799
CD45-PEBD Biosciences560975
CK-FITCBD Biosciences347653cytokeratin monoclonal antibody
DMEMHyCloneSH30081.05
fetal bovine serum (FBS)GIBCO,USA26140
Hoechst 33342Molecular Probes, Solarbio Corp., ChinaC0031
penicillin-streptomycinYing Reliable biotechnology, China
Red blood cells lysis (RBCL)Solarbio, BeijingR1010

References

  1. Chen, H., et al. Highly-sensitive capture of circulating tumor cells using micro-ellipse filters. Scientific Reports. 7 (1), 610 (2017).
  2. . World Health Organization Cancer report Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer (2022)
  3. Pantel, K., Brakenhoff, R. H., Brandt, B. Detection, clinical relevance and specific biological properties of disseminating tumour cells. Nature Reviews Cancer. 8 (5), 329-340 (2008).
  4. Mehlen, P., Puisieux, A. Metastasis: A question of life or death. Nature Reviews Cancer. 6 (6), 449-458 (2006).
  5. Sollier, E., et al. Size-selective collection of circulating tumor cells using Vortex technology. Lab on a Chip. 14 (1), 63-77 (2014).
  6. Stott, S. L., et al. Isolation and characterization of circulating tumor cells from patients with localized and metastatic prostate cancer. Science Translational Medicine. 2 (25), 23 (2010).
  7. Stott, S. L., et al. Isolation of circulating tumor cells using a microvortex-generating herringbone-chip. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 107 (43), 18392-18397 (2010).
  8. Nagrath, S., et al. Isolation of rare circulating tumor cells in cancer patients by microchip technology. Nature. 450 (7173), 1235-1239 (2007).
  9. Murlidhar, V., et al. A radial flow microfluidic device for ultra-high-throughput affinity-based isolation of circulating tumor cells. Small. 10 (23), 4895-4904 (2014).
  10. Tan, S. J., Yobas, L., Lee, G. Y. H., Ong, C. N., Lim, C. T. Microdevice for the isolation and enumeration of cancer cells from blood. Biomedical Microdevices. 11 (4), 883-892 (2009).
  11. Preira, P., et al. Passive circulating cell sorting by deformability using a microfluidic gradual filter. Lab on a Chip. 13 (1), 161-170 (2013).
  12. Yan, S., Zhang, J., Yuan, D., Li, W. Hybrid microfluidics combined with active and passive approaches for continuous cell separation. Electrophoresis. 38 (2), 238-249 (2017).
  13. Patil, P., Madhuprasad Kumeria, T., Losic, D., Kurkuri, M. Isolation of circulating tumour cells by physical means in a microfluidic device: A review. RSC Advances. 5 (109), 89745-89762 (2015).
  14. Kumeria, T., et al. Photoswitchable membranes based on peptide-modified nanoporous anodic alumina: Toward smart membranes for on-demand molecular transport. Advanced Materials. 27 (19), 3019-3024 (2015).
  15. Mahesh, P. B., et al. Recent advances in microfluidic platform for physical and immunological detection and capture of circulating tumor cells. Biosensors. 12 (4), 220 (2022).
  16. Chen, H., Cao, B., Chen, H., Lin, Y. -. S., Zhang, J. Combination of antibody-coated, physical-based microfluidic chip with wave-shaped arrays for isolating circulating tumor cells. Biomedical Microdevices. 19 (3), 66 (2017).
  17. Rushton, A. J., Nteliopoulos, G., Shaw, J. A., Coombes, R. C. A review of circulating tumour cell enrichment technologies. Cancers. 13 (5), 970 (2021).
  18. Chen, H., Zhang, Z. An inertia-deformability hybrid CTC chip: Design, clinical test and numerical study. Journal of Medical Devices. 12 (4), 041004 (2018).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Clinical Microfluidic ChipCirculating Tumor CellsCTC IsolationTumor Cell EnumerationMicrofluidic TechnologyFlow Rate OptimizationCell CultureMCF 7MDA MB 231HeLa CellsCapture EfficiencyCalcein AM StainingImmunofluorescence

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved