Sign In

Approximate Number Sense Test

Overview

Source: Laboratory of Jonathan Flombaum—Johns Hopkins University

A common carnival game is to ask people to guess the number of jellybeans packed into a jar. The chances that anyone will get the exact number right are low. But what about the chances that someone will guess 17 or 147,000? Probably even less than the chances of guessing the correct answer; 17 and 147,000 just seem irrational. Why? After all, if the beans cannot be taken out and counted one-at-a-time, how can someone tell that an estimate is too high or too low?

It turns out that in addition to verbal counting (something clearly learned), people appear to possess hardwired mental and neural mechanisms for estimating numbers. To put it colloquially, it is what might be called an ability to guesstimate, or “ballpark.” Experimental psychologists call it the “Approximate Number Sense,” and recent research with an experimental paradigm of the same name has begun to uncover the underlying computations and neural mechanisms that support the ability to guesstimate.

This video demonstrates standard procedures for investigating nonverbal numerical estimation with the Approximate Number Sense Test.

Procedure

1. Stimuli and trials

  1. Program the experiment in Psychopy, MATLAB, or something similar (a free version can also be downloaded for non-commercial uses at www.panamath.org).
  2. Design all trials in the experiment to look more or less the same.
    1. Divide the display in half. Use a grey background.
    2. One side of the display shows a collection of blue circles.
    3. The other side shows a collection of yellow circles.
  3. Draw

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Results

To graph the results from a participant, average performance as a function of the ratio on each trial (Figure 2). For example, across all 20 trials with a ratio of 2:1, in what fraction did the participant supply the right answer?

Figure 2
Figure 2. Sample results from a single participant in the approximate number test. Performance, measured as response accur

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Application and Summary

People differ between one another considerably in terms of the acuity of their approximate number sense. To characterize differences between individuals, experimental psychologists generally test to find the smallest ratio a person can tell apart with 75% accuracy. As shown in Figure 2, it is a ratio somewhere between 1.25 and 1.5. This number is just a quick way of summarizing how acute an approximate number sense a person has. But beyond the fact that there are large differences between people—on

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Tags
Approximate Number Sense TestGuesstimateQuantity RecognitionEstimationHard wired AbilityNonverbal Numerical EstimationStimuli DesignExperiment ProcedureData AnalysisPerformance AccuracyRatio Differences

Skip to...

0:00

Overview

1:03

Experimental Design

2:01

Running the Experiment

3:12

Representative Results

3:32

Applications

3:56

Summary

Videos from this collection:

article

Now Playing

Approximate Number Sense Test

Cognitive Psychology

7.3K Views

article

Dichotic Listening

Cognitive Psychology

25.9K Views

article

Measuring Reaction Time and Donders' Method of Subtraction

Cognitive Psychology

43.3K Views

article

Visual Search for Features and Conjunctions

Cognitive Psychology

26.6K Views

article

Perspectives on Cognitive Psychology

Cognitive Psychology

6.6K Views

article

Binocular Rivalry

Cognitive Psychology

7.7K Views

article

Multiple Object Tracking

Cognitive Psychology

7.5K Views

article

Mental Rotation

Cognitive Psychology

12.8K Views

article

Prospect Theory

Cognitive Psychology

11.0K Views

article

Measuring Verbal Working Memory Span

Cognitive Psychology

12.2K Views

article

The Precision of Visual Working Memory with Delayed Estimation

Cognitive Psychology

5.1K Views

article

Verbal Priming

Cognitive Psychology

14.7K Views

article

Incidental Encoding

Cognitive Psychology

8.2K Views

article

Visual Statistical Learning

Cognitive Psychology

6.9K Views

article

Motor Learning in Mirror Drawing

Cognitive Psychology

54.3K Views

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved