Sign In

Evaluating the Accuracy of Snap Judgments

Overview

Source: Diego Reinero & Jay Van Bavel—New York University

Social psychologists have long been interested in the way people form impressions of others. Much of this work has focused on the errors people make in judging others, such as the exaggerated influence of central traits (such as "warm" and "cold"), the insufficient weight given to the context in which others' behavior takes place, and the tendency for people to make judgments that conform to their initial expectations about another. However, this focus on errors masks the fact that people are quite good at making fairly accurate judgments about other people's characteristics, an ability that was no doubt important over the course of human evolution.

Indeed, the human ability to make quick sense of social situations and people ranks among our most valuable skills. What is particularly impressive about our ability to make sense of others is not just how little information we need to make inferences, but how well calibrated we can be with so little information. This video shows some experimental techniques used by psychology researchers, including Ambady and Rosenthal in their seminal work,1 and explores the process of making inferences in the context of students' evaluations of their teachers.

Procedure

1. Organize materials.

  1. Create videos, which includes previously filmed footage of 10 college instructors. The content of the teaching should cover a broad array of subject areas.
  2. For each teacher, identify three separate, 10-s clips. The three clips should be taken from the beginning, middle, and end of class, respectively, and feature the teacher alone in the video frame.
  3. Following Latin-square designs, combine the three clips in random order; do this for each teacher. This will result in

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Results

Results indicated that nine of the 15 molar ratings of nonverbal behavior positively correlated with end-of-semester ratings of teacher effectiveness (Figure 1), as did the overall mean molar rating. Molecular behaviors, on the other hand, were less predictive (Figure 2); only frowning and fidgeting (negatively) correlated with teaching effectiveness (Figure 3). Teacher attractiveness did not significantly relate to teacher effectiv

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Application and Summary

The described technique demonstrates that observing just 30 s of behavior is enough to draw accurate inferences about teaching effectiveness. Ambady and Rosenthal repeated this study using even shorter clips and found similar effects: Judgments based on three clips as short as 2.0 s yield high correlations with end-of-semester ratings.1 Knowledge of the nonverbal correlates of effective teaching help our understanding of the importance of affective behavior in teac

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

References
  1. Ambady, N. & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431-441.
  2. Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S., & Swanson, C. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 5-22.
Tags
AccuracySnap JudgmentsNew PeopleQuick JudgmentsSocial GatheringAppearanceVisual CuesFirst ImpressionsAmbady And RosenthalExperimental TechniquesTeaching EffectivenessCharacteristicsNovel College InstructorsAttributesNonverbal BehaviorsPhysical AppearanceTeaching EvaluationsMolar Ratings

Skip to...

0:00

Overview

1:07

Experimental Design

3:36

Running the Experiment

5:19

Data Analysis and Results

6:26

Applications

7:35

Summary

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved