The Institute of Noetic Sciences supported this research. We thank the developers of the original open-source algorithms that were adapted to develop some of BrainBeats&#39; algorithms.

Unveiling Brain-Heart Interplay with EEG and Cardio Signals

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Critical steps in the protocol 
Critical steps are described in steps 1.1-1.4. Warnings and error messages are implemented at various places in the toolbox to help users understand why they may encounter issues (e.g., electrode locations not loaded in the EEG data, file length being too short for calculating a reliable measure of ultra-low frequency HRV, signal quality being too low for any reliable analysis, etc.). Each function is documented for advanced users, and the parameters can be easily fin...

For a long time, the reductionist approach has dominated scientific inquiry in human physiology and cognition. This approach involved dissecting complex bodily and mental processes into smaller, more manageable components, allowing researchers to focus on individual systems in isolation. This strategy arose due to the challenges in studying the intricate and interconnected nature of the human body and mind1. Reductionism has been instrumental in understanding individual subsystems in isolation, such as elucidating the role of ion channels and action potentials for neural2 or cardiac3 communication. However, a significant gap remains in our understanding of how these isolated systems interact on a larger spatial and temporal scale. The multimodal (integrative or ecological) framework considers the human body a complex multidimensional system, where the mind is seen not as a product of the brain but as an activity of the living being, an activity that integrates the brain within the everyday functions of the human body4. The multimodal and reductionist approaches are not exclusive, just like we cannot study one neuron without the whole brain or the whole brain without understanding individual neuron properties. Together, they pave the way for a more comprehensive, synergetic understanding of human health, pathology, cognition, psychology, and consciousness. The present method aims to ease the multimodal investigation of the interplay between the brain and the heart by providing joint analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) and cardiovascular signals, namely electrocardiography (ECG) and photoplethysmography (PPG). This toolbox, implemented as an EEGLAB plugin in MATLAB, addresses existing methodological limitations and is made open source to facilitate accessibility and reproducibility in the scientific area. It implements the latest guidelines and recommendations into its design and default parameters to encourage users to follow known best practices. The proposed toolbox should be a valuable resource for researchers and clinicians interested in 1) studying&#160;heartbeat-evoked potentials&#160;, 2) extracting features from EEG and ECG/PPG signals, or 3) removing heart artifacts from EEG signals.
Heart-brain research 
The relationship between the heart and the brain has been historically studied via neuroimaging methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). Using these tools, researchers highlighted some brain regions associated with cardiovascular control (e.g., manipulation of heart rate and blood pressure5), showed the influence of heart rate on the BOLD signal6, or identified potential brain-body pathways contributing to coronary heart disease (i.e., stress-evoked blood pressure7). While these studies have significantly advanced our understanding of the complex interplay between the central nervous system (CNS) and cardiovascular function, these neuroimaging techniques are expensive, have limited availability, and are confined to controlled laboratory settings, which restricts their practicality for real-world and large-scale applications.
In contrast, EEG and ECG/PPG are more affordable and portable tools that offer the potential for studying brain-heart interactions in more diverse settings and populations or over longer periods, providing new opportunities. ECG measures the electrical signals generated by each heartbeat when the heart contracts and relaxes via electrodes placed on the skin (usually on the chest or arms)8. PPG measures blood volume changes in the microvascular tissues (i.e., blood flow and pulse rate) using a light source (e.g., LED) and a photodetector (commonly placed on a fingertip, wrist, or forehead), relying on how blood absorbs more light than the surrounding tissue9. Both methods provide valuable information about cardiovascular function but serve different purposes and offer distinct data types. Like ECG, EEG records the electrical fields generated by the synchronized activity of thousands of cortical neurons that propagate through the extracellular matrix, tissues, skull, and scalp until they reach the electrodes placed on the scalp&#39;s surface10. As such, the use of EEG and ECG/PPG holds great promise for advancing our understanding of the physiological, cognitive, and emotional processes underlying brain-heart interactions and their implications for human health and well-being. Therefore, capturing heart-brain interplay from EEG, ECG/PPG signals with the BrainBeats toolbox may be particularly useful for the following scientific areas: clinical diagnostic and forecasting, big data machine learning (ML), real-world self-monitoring11, and mobile brain/body imaging (MoBI)12,13.
Two approaches for jointly analyzing EEG and ECG signals 
There are two main approaches to studying interactions between EEG and cardiovascular signals:
The heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEP) in the time domain: event-related potentials (ERP), and the heartbeat-evoked oscillations (HEO) in the time-frequency domain: event-related spectral perturbations (ERSP) and inter-trial coherence (ITC). This approach examines how the brain processes each heartbeat. With millisecond (ms) accuracy, this method requires that both time series are perfectly synchronized and the heartbeats to be marked in the EEG signals. This approach has gained interest in recent years14,15,16,17,18,19.
Feature-based approach: this approach extracts EEG and heart-rate variability (HRV) features from continuous signals and examines associations between them. This has been done independently for EEG (often termed quantitative EEG or qEEG20), ECG21,22,23, and PPG24,25,26. This approach presents promising applications by capturing both state- and trait-related variables. Note that, for both EEG and cardiovascular signals, the longer the recording, the more dominant the trait variable27,28,29. Thus, the applications depend on the recording parameters. Feature-based analyses are gaining growing interest, providing new quantitative metrics for forecasting the development of mental and neurological disorders, treatment-response, or relapse30,31,32,33,34,35. This approach is especially compelling with large and real-world datasets (e.g., clinic, remote monitoring), which can be more easily obtained thanks to the recent innovations in wearable neurotechnology11. A less explored application is the identification of associations between specific brain and heart features, highlighting potential underlying central nervous system dynamics. Heart rate variability (HRV) can be calculated from both ECG and PPG signals. It provides information about the autonomous nervous system (ANS) by measuring the variations in time intervals between heartbeats (i.e., the normal-to-normal intervals)27. Increased sympathetic (SNS) activity (e.g., during stress or exercise) typically reduces HRV, while parasympathetic (PNS) activity (e.g., during relaxation) increases it. A slower breathing rate generally increases HRV due to enhanced PNS activity, especially for short recordings (&#60;10 min)27. Higher HRV scores generally suggest a more resilient and adaptable ANS, while a lower HRV can indicate stress, fatigue, or underlying health issues. Long HRV recordings (i.e., at least 24 h) provide a predictive prognosis for various health conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, stress, anxiety, and some neurological conditions27. Measures like blood pressure, heart rate, or cholesterol levels give information about the cardiovascular system&#39;s status. In contrast, HRV adds a dynamic aspect, showing how the heart responds to and recovers from stress.
BrainBeats&#39; advantages over existing methods 
While tools exist, as reviewed below, to process cardiovascular and EEG signals independently from each other, they cannot be jointly analyzed. Furthermore, most available means to process cardiovascular signals involve costly licensing, do not allow automated processing (especially beneficial for large datasets), have proprietary algorithms that prevent transparency and reproducibility, or require advanced programming skills by not providing a graphical user interface (GUI)36. To our knowledge, four open-source MATLAB toolboxes support HEP/HEO analysis with a GUI: the ecg-kit toolbox37, the BeMoBIL pipeline38, the HEPLAB EEGLAB plugin39, and the CARE-rCortex toolbox40. While HEPLAB, BeMoBIL, and ecg-kit facilitate HEP analysis by detecting heartbeats and marking them in the EEG signals, they do not provide statistical analysis or are limited to the time domain (i.e., HEP). The CARE-rCortex plugin addressed these issues by supporting ECG and respiratory signals, time-frequency domain analysis, statistics, and advanced baseline normalization and correction methods adapted to HEP/HEO analysis. However, it uses the Bonferroni method for statistical correction of the type 1 error (i.e., false positives), which is too conservative and not physiologically sound for EEG applications, leading to an increase in type II errors (i.e., false negatives)41. Furthermore, the toolbox does not offer command-line access for automation. Finally, recent studies recommend against baseline correction methods42,43,44, as they reduce the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and are statistically unnecessary and undesirable.
To address these limitations, we introduce the BrainBeats toolbox, currently implemented as an open-source EEGLAB plugin in the MATLAB environment. It incorporates the following advantages over previous methods:
1) An easy-to-use GUI and command-line capabilities (for programmers aiming to perform automated processing). 2) Validated algorithms, parameters, and guidelines for processing cardiovascular signals, such as detecting R peaks, interpolating RR artifacts, and computing HRV metrics (e.g., implanting guidelines for windowing, resampling, normalization, etc.27,45,46). This is important because Vest et al. demonstrated how modest differences in these processing steps can lead to divergent results, contributing to the lack of reproducibility and clinical applicability of HRV metrics46. 3) Validated algorithms, default parameters, and guidelines for processing EEG signals, including filtering and windowing44,47, re-referencing48,49, removal of abnormal channels and artifacts50,51,52, optimized ICA decomposition and classification of independent components53,54,55,56. The users can fine-tune all preprocessing parameters or even preprocess their EEG data with their preferred method before using the toolbox to match their needs (e.g., with EEGLAB clean_rawdata plugin50,52, the BeMoBIL pipeline38, the PREP pipeline57, etc.). 4) Heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEP, i.e., time domain) and oscillations (HEO; event-related spectral perturbations with wavelet or FFT methods, and inter-trial coherence are available through the standard EEGLAB software) from ECG signals. Parametric and nonparametric statistics with corrections for type 1 errors are available via EEGLAB&#39;s standard software. Nonparametric statistics include permutation statistics and spatiotemporal corrections for multiple comparisons (e.g., spatiotemporal clustering or threshold-free cluster enhancement)58,59. Users can use the LIMO-EEG plugin to implement hierarchical linear modeling, which accounts well for within and between-subjects variance and implements an assumption-free mass-univariate approach with robust control for type I and II errors60,61. The HEP/HEO data statistical analyses can be performed in the channel and independent component domains. 5) HEP/HEO and HRV analysis from PPG signals (for the first time for HEP/HEO). 6) Supports the joint extraction of EEG and HRV features for the first time. 7) The toolbox provides various data visualizations to inspect signals at various necessary processing steps and outputs at the subject level.
<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Method</td>
			<td>Detect R-peaks from ECG</td>
			<td>Detect R-waves from PPG</td>
			<td>HEP/HEO</td>
			<td>EEG &#38; HRV features</td>
			<td>Remove heart artifacts from EEG</td>
			<td>GUI</td>
			<td>Command line</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>ecg-kit</td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>X</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>BeMoBIL</td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>X</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>HEPLAB</td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td>X</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>CARE-rCortex</td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td></td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td></td>
			<td></td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td>X</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>BrainBeats</td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td>X</td>
			<td>X</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
TABLE 1:&#160;Novelties brought by BrainBeats relative to pre-existing, similar methods.
Information to help readers decide whether the method is appropriate for them 
This toolbox is appropriate for any researcher or clinician with EEG and ECG/PPG data. The plugin does not yet support importing EEG and ECG/PPG signals from separate files (although this feature will be available soon). The toolbox is appropriate for anyone aiming to perform HEP/HEO analysis, extract EEG and/or HRV features with standardized methods, or simply remove heart artifacts from EEG signals. See Figure 1 for a block diagram summarizing BrainBeats&#39; overall flow and methods.
<img alt="Figure 1" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/65829/65829fig01.jpg" /> 
FIGURE 1.&#160;Block diagram summarizing BrainBeats&#39; overall architecture and flow.&#160;The operations that are common across the three methods are brown. Operations specific to heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEP) and oscillations (HEO) are green. Operations specific to the extraction of EEG and HRV features are blue. Operations specific to removing heart artifacts from the EEG signals are red. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/65829/65829fig01large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>

<table><tbody><tr><td>EEGLAB</td><td>Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience (SCCN)</td><td></td><td>Free/Open-source</td></tr><tr><td>MATLAB</td><td>The Mathworks, Inc.</td><td></td><td>Requires a license</td></tr><tr><td>Windows PC</td><td>Lenovo, Inc.</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

brainbeats as an open-source eeglab plugin to jointly analyze eeg and cardiovascular signals

The interplay between the brain and the cardiovascular systems is garnering increased attention for its potential to advance our understanding of human physiology and improve health outcomes. However, the multimodal analysis of these signals is challenging due to the lack of guidelines, standardized signal processing and statistical tools, graphical user interfaces (GUIs), and automation for processing large datasets or increasing reproducibility. A further void exists in standardized EEG and heart-rate variability (HRV) feature extraction methods, undermining clinical diagnostics or the robustness of machine learning (ML) models. In response to these limitations, we introduce the BrainBeats toolbox. Implemented as an open-source EEGLAB plugin, BrainBeats integrates three main protocols: 1) Heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEP) and oscillations (HEO) for assessing time-locked brain-heart interplay at the millisecond accuracy; 2) EEG and HRV feature extraction for examining associations/differences between various brain and heart metrics or for building robust feature-based ML models; 3) Automated extraction of heart artifacts from EEG signals to remove any potential cardiovascular contamination while conducting EEG analysis. We provide a step-by-step tutorial for applying these three methods to an open-source dataset containing simultaneous 64-channel EEG, ECG, and PPG signals. Users can easily fine-tune parameters to tailor their unique research needs using the graphical user interface (GUI) or the command line. BrainBeats should make brain-heart interplay research more accessible and reproducible.

First, the BrainBeats plugin was used to preprocess EEG and ECG data, identify and remove artifacts, and analyze heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEP) and oscillations (HEO). BrainBeats successfully detected the RR intervals from the ECG signal and some RR artifacts (Figure 2). BrainBeats also reported in the command window that 11/305 (3.61%) of the heartbeats were flagged as artifacts and interpolated. The average signal quality index (SQI) of the RR intervals (before interpolation) has a valu...

Read this Scientific Article Protocol about BrainBeats as an Open-Source EEGLAB Plugin to Jointly Analyze EEG and Cardiovascular Signals at JoVE.com

Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis

The BrainBeats toolbox is an open-source EEGLAB plugin designed to jointly analyze EEG and cardiovascular (ECG/PPG) signals. It includes heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEP) assessment, feature-based analysis, and heart artifact extraction from EEG signals. The protocol will aid in studying brain-heart interplay through two lenses (HEP and features), enhancing reproducibility and accessibility.

BrainBeats as an Open-Source EEGLAB Plugin to Jointly Analyze EEG and Cardiovascular Signals

The interplay between the brain and the cardiovascular systems is garnering increased attention for its potential to advance our understanding of human ...

brainbeats-as-an-open-source-eeglab-plugin-to-jointly-analyze-eeg

Research

JoVE Journal

Neuroscience

1.6K Views.  Toulouse III University. The BrainBeats toolbox is an open-source EEGLAB plugin designed to jointly analyze EEG and cardiovascular (ECG/PPG) signals. It includes heartbeat-evoked potentials (HEP) assessment, feature-based analysis, and heart artifact extraction from EEG signals. The protocol will aid in studying brain-heart interplay through two lenses (HEP and features), enhancing reproducibility and accessibility.

Video: Author Spotlight: Advancing the Study of Brain-Heart Interplay with a Comprehensive EEGLAB Plugin for Multimodal Signal Analysis

Functional Mapping with Simultaneous MEG and EEG

We use magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) to locate and determine the temporal evolution in brain areas involved in the processing of simple sensory stimuli. We will use somatosensory stimuli to locate the hand somatosensory areas, auditory stimuli to locate the auditory cortices, visual stimuli in four quadrants of the visual field to locate the early visual areas. These type of experiments are used for functional mapping in epileptic and brain tumor patients to locate eloquent cortices. In basic neuroscience similar experimental protocols are used to study the orchestration of cortical activity. The acquisition protocol includes quality assurance procedures, subject preparation for the combined MEG/EEG study, and acquisition of evoked-response data with somatosensory, auditory, and visual stimuli. We also demonstrate analysis of the data using the equivalent current dipole model and cortically-constrained minimum-norm estimates. Anatomical MRI data are employed in the analysis for visualization and for deriving boundaries of tissue boundaries for forward modeling and cortical location and orientation constraints for the minimum-norm estimates.

We use magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) to map brain areas involved in the processing of simple sensory stimuli.

We use magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) to locate and determine the temporal evolution in brain areas involved in the ...

Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children

EEG is traditionally described as a neuroimaging technique with high temporal and low spatial resolution. Recent advances in biophysical modelling and signal processing make it possible to exploit information from other imaging modalities like structural MRI that provide high spatial resolution to overcome this constraint1. This is especially useful for investigations that require high resolution in the temporal as well as spatial domain. In addition, due to the easy application and low cost of EEG recordings, EEG is often the method of choice when working with populations, such as young children, that do not tolerate functional MRI scans well. However, in order to investigate which neural substrates are involved, anatomical information from structural MRI is still needed. Most EEG analysis packages work with standard head models that are based on adult anatomy. The accuracy of these models when used for children is limited2, because the composition and spatial configuration of head tissues changes dramatically over development3.&#160;
In the present paper, we provide an overview of our recent work in utilizing head models based on individual structural MRI scans or age specific head models to reconstruct the cortical generators of high density EEG. This article describes how&#160;EEG recordings are acquired, processed, and analyzed with pediatric populations at the London Baby Lab, including laboratory setup, task design, EEG preprocessing, MRI processing, and EEG channel level and source analysis.&#160;

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in estimating the cortical sources of scalp measured electrical activity for cognitive neuroscience experiments. This article describes how high density EEG is acquired and how recordings are processed for cortical source estimation in children from the age of 2 years at the London Baby Lab.

EEG is traditionally described as a neuroimaging technique with high temporal and low spatial resolution. Recent advances in biophysical modelling and ...

Behavior

Building An Open-source Robotic Stereotaxic Instrument

This protocol includes the designs and software necessary to upgrade an existing stereotaxic instrument to a robotic (CNC) stereotaxic instrument for around $1,000 (excluding a drill), using industry standard stepper motors and CNC controlling software. Each axis has variable speed control and may be operated simultaneously or independently. The robot&#39;s flexibility and open coding system (g-code) make it capable of performing custom tasks that are not supported by commercial systems. Its applications include, but are not limited to, drilling holes, sharp edge craniotomies, skull thinning, and lowering electrodes or cannula. In order to expedite the writing of g-coding for simple surgeries, we have developed custom scripts that allow individuals to design a surgery with no knowledge of programming. However, for users to get the most out of the motorized stereotax, it would be beneficial to be knowledgeable in mathematical programming and G-Coding (simple programming for CNC machining).
The recommended drill speed is greater than 40,000 rpm. The stepper motor resolution is 1.8&#176;/Step, geared to 0.346&#176;/Step. A standard stereotax has a resolution of 2.88 &#956;m/step. The maximum recommended cutting speed is 500 &#956;m/sec. The maximum recommended jogging speed is 3,500 &#956;m/sec. The maximum recommended drill bit size is HP 2.

This protocol includes the designs and software necessary to upgrade an existing stereotaxic instrument to a robotic (computer numeric controlled; CNC) stereotaxic instrument for around $1,000 (excluding a drill).

This protocol includes the designs and software necessary to upgrade an existing stereotaxic instrument to a robotic (CNC) stereotaxic instrument for ...

Video Imaging and Spatiotemporal Maps to Analyze Gastrointestinal Motility in Mice

The enteric nervous system (ENS) plays an important role in regulating gastrointestinal (GI) motility and can function independently of the central nervous system. Changes in ENS function are a major cause of GI symptoms and disease and may contribute to GI symptoms reported in neuropsychiatric disorders including autism. It is well established that isolated colon segments generate spontaneous, rhythmic contractions known as Colonic Migrating Motor Complexes (CMMCs). A procedure to analyze the enteric neural regulation of CMMCs in ex vivo preparations of mouse colon is described. The colon is dissected from the animal and flushed to remove fecal content prior to being cannulated in an organ bath. Data is acquired via a video camera positioned above the organ bath and converted to high-resolution spatiotemporal maps via an in-house software package. Using this technique, baseline contractile patterns and pharmacological effects on ENS function in colon segments can be compared over 3-4 hr. In addition, propagation length and speed of CMMCs can be recorded as well as changes in gut diameter and contraction frequency. This technique is useful for characterizing gastrointestinal motility patterns in transgenic mouse models (and in other species including rat and guinea pig). In this way, pharmacologically induced changes in CMMCs are recorded in wild type mice and in the Neuroligin-3R451C mouse model of autism. Furthermore, this technique can be applied to other regions of the GI tract including the duodenum, jejunum and ileum and at different developmental ages in mice.

This article describes a video imaging technique and high-resolution spatiotemporal mapping to identify changes in the neural regulation of colonic motility in adult mice. Subtle effects on gastrointestinal (GI) function can be detected using this approach in isolated tissue preparations to advance our understanding of GI disease.

The enteric nervous system (ENS) plays an important role in regulating gastrointestinal (GI) motility and can function independently of the central ...

Electrophysiological Method for Recording Intracellular Voltage Responses of Drosophila Photoreceptors and Interneurons to Light Stimuli In Vivo

Voltage responses of insect photoreceptors and visual interneurons can be accurately recorded with conventional sharp microelectrodes. The method described here enables the investigator to measure long-lasting (from minutes to hours) high-quality intracellular responses from single Drosophila R1-R6 photoreceptors and Large Monopolar Cells (LMCs) to light stimuli. Because the recording system has low noise, it can be used to study variability among individual cells in the fly eye, and how their outputs reflect the physical properties of the visual environment. We outline all key steps in performing this technique. The basic steps in constructing an appropriate electrophysiology set-up for recording, such as design and selection of the experimental equipment are described. We also explain how to prepare for recording by making appropriate (sharp) recording and (blunt) reference electrodes. Details are given on how to fix an intact fly in a bespoke fly-holder, prepare a small window in its eye and insert a recording electrode through this hole with minimal damage. We explain how to localize the center of a cell's receptive field, dark- or light-adapt the studied cell, and to record its voltage responses to dynamic light stimuli. Finally, we describe the criteria for stable normal recordings, show characteristic high-quality voltage responses of individual cells to different light stimuli, and briefly define how to quantify their signaling performance. Many aspects of the method are technically challenging and require practice and patience to master. But once learned and optimized for the investigator's experimental objectives, it grants outstanding in vivo neurophysiological data.

Electrophysiological Method for Recording Intracellular Voltage Responses of Drosophila Photoreceptors and Interneurons to Light Stimuli In Vivo

Sharp microelectrodes enable accurate electrophysiological characterization of photoreceptor and visual interneuron output in living Drosophila. Here we show how to use this method to record high-quality voltage responses of individual cells to controlled light stimulation. This method is ideal for studying neural information processing in insect compound eyes.

Voltage responses of insect photoreceptors and visual interneurons can be accurately recorded with conventional sharp microelectrodes. The method ...

Non-restraining EEG Radiotelemetry: Epidural and Deep Intracerebral Stereotaxic EEG Electrode Placement

Implantable EEG radiotelemetry is of central relevance in the neurological characterization of transgenic mouse models of neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative diseases as well as epilepsies. This powerful technique does not only provide valuable insights into the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, i.e., the etiopathogenesis of CNS related diseases, it also facilitates the development of new translational, i.e., therapeutic approaches. Whereas competing techniques that make use of recorder systems used in jackets or tethered systems suffer from their unphysiological restraining to semi-restraining character, radiotelemetric EEG recordings overcome these disadvantages. Technically, implantable EEG radiotelemetry allows for precise and highly sensitive measurement of epidural and deep, intracerebral EEGs under various physiological and pathophysiological conditions. First, we present a detailed protocol of a straight forward, successful, quick and efficient technique for epidural (surface) EEG recordings resulting in high-quality electrocorticograms. Second, we demonstrate how to implant deep, intracerebral EEG electrodes, e.g., in the hippocampus (electrohippocampogram). For both approaches, a computerized 3D stereotaxic electrode implantation system is used. The radiofrequency transmitter itself is implanted into a subcutaneous pouch in both mice and rats. Special attention also has to be paid to pre-, peri- and postoperative treatment of the experimental animals. Preoperative preparation of mice and rats, suitable anesthesia as well as postoperative treatment and pain management are described in detail.

Non-restraining EEG radiotelemetry is a valuable methodological approach to record in vivo long-term electroencephalograms from freely moving rodents. This detailed protocol describes stereotaxic epidural and deep intracerebral electrode placement in different brain regions in order to obtain reliable recordings of CNS rhythmicity and CNS related behavioral stages.

Implantable EEG radiotelemetry is of central relevance in the neurological characterization of transgenic mouse models of neuropsychiatric and ...

High-density Electroencephalographic Acquisition in a Rodent Model Using Low-cost and Open-source Resources

Advanced electroencephalographic analysis techniques requiring high spatial resolution, including electrical source imaging and measures of network connectivity, are applicable to an expanding variety of questions in neuroscience. Performing these kinds of analyses in a rodent model requires higher electrode density than traditional screw electrodes can accomplish. While higher-density electroencephalographic montages for rodents exist, they are of limited availability to most researchers, are not robust enough for repeated experiments over an extended period of time, or are limited to use in anesthetized rodents.1-3 A proposed low-cost method for constructing a durable, high-count, transcranial electrode array, consisting of bilaterally implantable headpieces is investigated as a means to perform advanced electroencephalogram analyses in mice or rats.

Procedures for headpiece fabrication and surgical implantation necessary to produce high signal to noise, low-impedance electroencephalographic and electromyographic signals are presented. While the methodology is useful in both rats and mice, this manuscript focuses on the more challenging implementation for the smaller mouse skull. Freely moving mice are only tethered to cables via a common adapter during recording. One version of this electrode system that includes 26 electroencephalographic channels and 4 electromyographic channels is described below.

Instructions for the low-cost construction and surgical implantation of a chronic transcranial high-density electroencephalographic montage into mice are provided. Signal recording, extraction, and processing techniques are also described.

Advanced electroencephalographic analysis techniques requiring high spatial resolution, including electrical source imaging and measures of network ...

Microstate and Omega Complexity Analyses of the Resting-state Electroencephalography

Microstate and omega complexity are two reference-free electroencephalography (EEG) measures that can represent the temporal and spatial complexities of EEG data and have been widely used to investigate the neural mechanisms in some brain disorders. The goal of this article is to describe the protocol underlying EEG microstate and omega complexity analyses step by step. The main advantage of these two measures is that they could eliminate the reference-dependent problem inherent to traditional spectrum analysis. In addition, microstate analysis makes good use of high time resolution of resting-state EEG, and the four obtained microstate classes could match the corresponding resting-state networks respectively. The omega complexity characterizes the spatial complexity of the whole brain or specific brain regions, which has obvious advantage compared with traditional complexity measures focusing on the signal complexity in a single channel. These two EEG measures could complement each other to investigate the brain complexity from the temporal and spatial domain respectively.

This article describes the protocol underlying electroencephalography (EEG) microstate analysis and omega complexity analysis, which are two reference-free EEG measures and highly valuable to explore the neural mechanisms of brain disorders.

Microstate and omega complexity are two reference-free electroencephalography (EEG) measures that can represent the temporal and spatial complexities of ...

Noninvasive EEG Recordings from Freely Moving Piglets

The method allows the recording of high-quality electroencephalograms (EEGs) from freely moving piglets directly in the pigpen. We use a one-channel telemetric electroencephalography system in combination with standard self-adhesive hydrogel electrodes. The piglets are calmed down without the use of sedatives. After their release into the pigpen, the piglets behave normally&#8212;they drink and sleep in the same cycle as their siblings. Their sleep phases are used for the EEG recordings.

Here, we present a protocol to record telemetric electroencephalograms (EEGs) from freely moving piglets directly in the pigpen without the use of a sedative, making it possible to record typical EEG patterns during non-REM sleep, like spindle bursts.

The method allows the recording of high-quality electroencephalograms (EEGs) from freely moving piglets directly in the pigpen. We use a one-channel ...

Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging

Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) are two of the fundamental noninvasive methods for identifying brain activity. Multimodal methods have sought to combine the high temporal resolution of EEG with the spatial precision of fMRI, but the complexity of this approach is currently in need of improvement. The protocol presented here describes the recently developed spatiotemporal fMRI-constrained EEG source imaging method, which seeks to rectify source biases and improve EEG-fMRI source localization through the dynamic recruitment of fMRI sub-regions. The process begins with the collection of multimodal data from concurrent EEG and fMRI scans, the generation of 3D cortical models, and independent EEG and fMRI processing. The processed fMRI activation maps are then split into multiple priors, according to their location and surrounding area. These are taken as priors in a two-level hierarchical Bayesian algorithm for EEG source localization. For each window of interest (defined by the operator), specific segments of the fMRI activation map will be identified as active to optimize a parameter known as model evidence. These will be used as soft constraints on the identified cortical activity, increasing the specificity of the multimodal imaging method by reducing cross-talk and avoiding erroneous activity in other conditionally active fMRI regions. The method generates cortical maps of activity and time-courses, which may be taken as final results, or used as a basis for further analyses (analyses of correlation, causation, etc.) While the method is somewhat limited by its modalities (it will not find EEG-invisible sources), it is broadly compatible with most major processing software, and is suitable for most neuroimaging studies.

An EEG-fMRI multimodal imaging method, known as the spatiotemporal fMRI-constrained EEG source imaging method, is described here. The presented method employs conditionally-active fMRI sub-maps, or priors, to guide EEG source localization in a manner that improves spatial specificity and limits erroneous results.

BrainBeats as an Open-Source EEGLAB Plugin to Jointly Analyze EEG and Cardiovascular Signals

Summary

Explore More Videos

Chapters in this video

Functional Mapping with Simultaneous MEG and EEG

Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children

Building An Open-source Robotic Stereotaxic Instrument

Video Imaging and Spatiotemporal Maps to Analyze Gastrointestinal Motility in Mice

Electrophysiological Method for Recording Intracellular Voltage Responses of Drosophila Photoreceptors and Interneurons to Light Stimuli In Vivo

Non-restraining EEG Radiotelemetry: Epidural and Deep Intracerebral Stereotaxic EEG Electrode Placement

High-density Electroencephalographic Acquisition in a Rodent Model Using Low-cost and Open-source Resources

Microstate and Omega Complexity Analyses of the Resting-state Electroencephalography

Noninvasive EEG Recordings from Freely Moving Piglets

Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging