Funding for this work was provided by a Grow Iowa Values Fund award to BFBS.

1. Surface Sampling with Sterile Adhesive Tape
<ol>
<li> Select a tape to use for sampling. The commercially available Fungi-Tape or Con-Tact-It sampling tapes are sterile and specially packaged for ease of use. However, we have found that transparent (optically clear) generic office tape can also be used. </li>
<li>Use a permanent marker to draw 1 cm2 squares on the non-sticky side of a 10 cm piece of adhesive tape (a paper template can be used). This will serve as a visual guide for noting which portion of the tape has been used to sample the food or environmental surface. </li>
<li>Form a "C"-shaped loop of tape, with the sticky side facing the surface to be sampled. To do this, hold the sticky ends with the thumb and middle finger and position the index finger against the drawn square on the back (non-sticky side) of the tape (Figure 1).</li>
<li>Place the tape on the surface to be sampled and gently press the marked area against the surface. Without releasing the edges of the tape, use the index finger to ensure that the sticky side of the tape comes in full contact with the sample surface, avoiding bubbles.</li>
<li>Using an even motion, slowly pull the tape away from the sample, physically extracting surface-bound microbes. Fasten the cell-charged tape, sticky side up, onto a glass microscope slide using generic transparent office tape. Ensure proper tension/stretching of the tape so that a flat, non-wrinkly surface is created. This will help minimize problems with deformation/curling of the tape during subsequent heating during hybridization.</li>
</ol>
2. Solid-phase Enrichment and Liquid Surface Miniculture
<ol>
<li> Solid-phase enrichment is performed by placing the tape face-down on xylose-lysine-Tergitol 4 (XLT-4) agar plates so that the sampled cells are placed in direct contact with the agar surface. The templated/sample contact portion of the tape is placed flush with the agar surface and one end of the tape is loosely adhered to the side wall of the Petri dish to facilitate easy removal of the tape from the agar surface following enrichment. </li>
<li>Plates are inverted (to avoid condensation) and incubated at 35 - 37&deg;C to allow sufficient growth of Salmonella spp. The length of the incubation period needed to enrich the cells to a detectable level will depend on initial Salmonella contamination levels. We have observed excellent microcolony formation from low initial inocula after 8 h enrichment. </li>
<li>After the desired enrichment period, open the agar plate. The tape will retain its tackiness during incubation. Gently press the tape against the agar using the index finger to ensure maximum recovery of microcolonies formed at the tape-agar interface. Grasp the tape from the edge attached to the wall of the Petri dish and remove it with a slow, even motion. Mount the cell-charged tape, sticky side up, onto a microscope slide as described in section 1.5 above. Proceed to "Fixation and Dehydration" step below.</li>
<li>For liquid surface miniculture, begin by fastening the tape used for sampling onto a microscope slide as described in section 1.5 above. Next, cover the templated/sample contact portion of the tape with a non-sterile silicone perfusion chamber (Coverwell, Grace Bio-Labs, Inc.), forming a sealed chamber whose bottom is comprised of the cell-charged tape, facing upwards. Firmly, but gently press the chamber into place to ensure a watertight seal.</li>
<li>Using a flexible gel loading pipette tip, transfer &le; 500 &mu;L Trypticase Soy Broth or other suitable enrichment medium through one of the chamber's small inlet ports. Seal both ports with transparent office tape to prevent evaporation and incubate slides at 35 -37&deg;C as needed for sufficient enrichment. Although all operations should be performed according to good sampling and handling practices, sterility of port-sealing tape or perfusion chambers is not required during liquid surface miniculture. The combination of FISH and flow cytometry will enable clear discrimination of Salmonella spp. from non-target bacteria that may be present, with the largest contribution of non-target flora expected to come from the sample itself. Proceed to "Fixation and Dehydration" step below.</li>
</ol>
3. Fixation and Dehydration
<ol>
<li> For direct surface sampling or for solid phase enrichment of Salmonella spp. on XLT-4 agar, perform on-tape cell fixation for 30 min at 25&deg;C by covering the sample contact area with 500 &mu;L 10% neutral buffered formalin. </li>
<li>Discard fixative into a sealable container (under a chemical hood to minimize exposure to irritating/toxic vapor). </li>
<li>Dehydrate in an ethanol series (50%, 80% and 95%; 300 &mu;L/3 min each concentration). Proceed to "Hybridization" step below.</li>
<li>For fixation of 500 &mu;L liquid surface miniculture samples, perfusion chambers are unsealed, and a flexible gel-loading pipette tip is used to extract the enrichate. Rapid up and down pipetting is used to help ensure effective removal of any remaining tape-bound cells. </li>
<li>Next, the entire 500 &mu;L miniculture volume is transferred to a microcentrifuge tube and spun down at 2,000 x g (5 min). The supernatant is discarded, the pellet is vortexed vigorously for 30-60 s, then resuspended in an equal volume of 10% neutral buffered formalin. Cells are fixed for 30 min at 25&deg;C.</li>
<li>Next, fixative is removed and the sample is resuspended in cell storage buffer, as follows. The sample is spun down at 2,000 x g (5 min, 25&deg;C) the supernatant is discarded, the pellet is vortexed vigorously for 30 - 60 s, the resuspended in an equal volume of 50% non-denatured ethanol-50% phosphate-buffered saline. Fixed cells can be stored indefinitely (years) at -20&deg;C. Note: Whenever liquids are changed (for example, when introducing a fixative or different buffer), it is important to thoroughly resuspend (with vortexing) the cell pellet in a minimal portion (~10 - 20 &mu;L) of the "outgoing" liquid system. This will help prevent clumping and ensure that even suspensions of individual cells are obtained. Proceed to "Hybridization" step below.</li>
</ol>
4. Hybridization
<ol>
<li> Prepare hybridization/washing buffer using the commercial molecular biology-grade solutions noted in Materials Table. Final buffer component concentrations are 0.7 M NaCl, 0.1 M TRIS [pH 8.0], 10 mM EDTA, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, made up to the final desired volume with molecular-grade water and filtered using a 0.22 &mu;m syringe or cup filter. The same buffer, without the addition of probes (see below) is used as a washing buffer. Preheat hybridization and washing buffers to 55&deg;C.</li>
<li>Add fluorescently-labeled Sal3 (Nordentoft et al., 1997; 5'- AAT CAC TTC ACC TAC GTG-3') and Salm-63 (Kutter et al., 2006; 5'-TCG ACT GAC TTC AGC TCC-3') oligonucleotide probes (Materials Table) to preheated hybridization buffer. A total probe concentration of 5 ng &mu;L-1 is used (e.g. 2.5 ng &mu;L-1 each probe; Bisha and Brehm-Stecher, 2009a). </li>
<li>For direct-to-tape and solid phase enrichment samples, overlay the templated sample contact area of the tape with 300 &mu;L of hybridization buffer containing the probe cocktail and hybridize tape-bound cells in a moist, sealed incubation chamber set to 55&deg;C. If a direct-contact incubator such as the Slide Moat instrument (Materials Table) is used, samples are hybridized for 15 min and &gt;20 slides can be processed simultaneously. If a rotary-style hybridization oven such as the Bambino instrument (Materials Table) is used, slides are placed in 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes for hybridization, one slide per tube. Because heat transfer is not direct, these samples are hybridized for longer periods (up to 30 min).</li>
<li>Following hybridization, the slides are removed and the probe-containing hybridization buffer overlay is discarded. Slides are then either briefly and gently rinsed with preheated washing buffer by pipetting a small volume of buffer over a tilted slide (3 rinses of 300 &mu;L each), or formally washed (up to 30 min) with either an overlay of preheated washing buffer or immersion in a 50 mL polypropylene centrifuge tube containing preheated washing buffer. In our experience, although a formal wash will provide improved results (less haze from unbound probe), a simple rinse is adequate for unambiguous detection of Salmonella spp. Next, slides are air-dried before moving to the "Detection" step below.</li>
<li>Hybridization of liquid surface miniculture samples is performed by spinning down samples (freshly-fixed or kept in storage buffer at -20&deg;C) for 5 min at 2,000 x g, followed by vigorous vortexing of the pellet and resuspension in 100 &mu;L preheated hybridization buffer containing the probe cocktail. Samples are hybridized at 55&deg;C for 30 min on a heat block or other suitable incubation station (Materials Table), followed by addition of 500 &mu;L preheated washing buffer. As with tape-bound samples, these samples may be formally washed for up to 30 min with further incubation at 55&deg;C in this wash buffer, with intermittent vortexing. Alternatively, samples may be thoroughly vortexed after addition of 500 &mu;L preheated washing buffer, followed by immediate harvesting for analysis (below).</li>
<li>In preparation for detection of Salmonella spp. via flow cytometry, liquid surface miniculture samples are spun down at 2,000 x g for 5 min, the supernatant is discarded and the samples are resuspended in 300 &mu;L room temperature (~25&deg;C) PBS. If samples require transport to a distant facility, or if a delay is expected in between hybridization and analysis, samples may be refrigerated or held on ice prior to analysis. Alternatively, samples may be transferred to cell storage buffer (50:50 mixture of PBS and absolute ethanol) and held at -20&deg;C for up to a week without appreciable losses in probe-conferred fluorescence (Bisha and Brehm-Stecher, 2009b).</li>
</ol>
5. Detection
<ol>
<li>For on-tape detection of Salmonella spp. via fluorescence microscopy, direct-to-tape or solid phase enrichment samples are overlayed with ~10 &mu;L Vectashield H-1200 mounting medium containing the nuclear counterstain 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), mounted with a cover slip, then incubated in the dark for 10 min.</li>
<li>Immersion oil is placed on the cover slip, and samples are examined using a high-magnification oil objective (63x or 100x). The DAPI filter is used to bring the sample into focus, the microscope is then switched to the appropriate filter (green or red, depending on the dye used to end-label the probes) and Salmonella cells are scored visually according to their fluorescence (Figures 2 and 3).</li>
<li>For cytometric detection of liquid surface miniculture samples, various instruments may be used, depending on local availability. In our lab, PBS-suspended samples are transferred to 5 mL round bottom sampling tubes (BD Falcon) and examined using a FACSCanto flow cytometer with excitation at 647 nm (Materials Table). For enriched samples containing high numbers of total bacteria, the "low flow rate" setting (10 &mu;L min-1) is used and 5,000-50,000 events are collected. Data are analyzed using FlowJo software (version 8.8.6, Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR) or other suitable analysis software (Figure 4, panels A and B).</li>
</ol>
6. Representative Results
<img src="/files/ftp_upload/2308/2308fig1.jpg" alt="Figure 1" /> Figure 1. Use of adhesive tape for sampling of Salmonella spp. from the surface of an artificially contaminated tomato.
<img src="/files/ftp_upload/2308/2308fig2.jpg" alt="Figure 2" /> Figure 2. Typical results for direct-to-tape sampling and FISH detection of Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 14028 from the surface of a tomato (100 X oil objective). A two-probe cocktail of Texas Red-labeled probes (Sal3/Salm-63) was used to label these cells.
<img src="/files/ftp_upload/2308/2308fig3.jpg" alt="Figure 3" /> Figure 3. Microcolonies of Salmonella Typhimurium ATCC 14028 formed on the surface of Xylose Lysine Tergitol-4 (XLT-4) agar after an 8 h on-tape enrichment at 37&deg;C. The initial inoculum was sampled from the surface of an artificially contaminated tomato. Solid-phase enrichment increases the numbers of cells available for detection and also enhances cellular rRNA content. 
<img src="/files/ftp_upload/2308/2308fig4.jpg" alt="Figure 4" /> Figure 4. Use of adhesive tape for sampling of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium from the surface of an artificially contaminated tomato, followed by direct analysis via FISH and flow cytometry (panel A) or after 5 h non-selective liquid surface miniculture enrichment in a perfusion chamber filled with 500 &mu;L Trypticase Soy Broth (panel B).

<ol>
	<li>Almeida, C., Azevedo, N. F., Fernandes, R. M., Keevil, C. W., Vieira, M. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Fluorescence+in+situ+hybridization+method+using+a+peptide+nucleic+acid+probe+for+the+identification+of+Salmonella+spp.+in+a+broad+spectrum+of+samples.">Fluorescence in situ hybridization method using a peptide nucleic acid probe for the identification of Salmonella spp. in a broad spectrum of samples.</a> Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 4476-4485 (2010).</li><li>Barnetson, R. S., Milne, L. J. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Skin+sampling+for+Candida+with+adhesive+tape.">Skin sampling for Candida with adhesive tape.</a> Br. J. Dermatol. 88, 487-491 (1973).</li><li>Bisha, B., Brehm-Stecher, B. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Simple+adhesive-tape-based+sampling+of+tomato+surfaces+combined+with+rapid+fluorescence+in+situ+hybridization+for+Salmonella+detection.">Simple adhesive-tape-based sampling of tomato surfaces combined with rapid fluorescence in situ hybridization for Salmonella detection.</a> Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 1450-1455 .</li><li>Bisha, B., Brehm-Stecher, B. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Flow-through+imaging+cytometry+for+characterization+of+Salmonella+subpopulations+in+alfalfa+sprouts,+a+microbiologically+complex+food+system.">Flow-through imaging cytometry for characterization of Salmonella subpopulations in alfalfa sprouts, a microbiologically complex food system.</a> Biotechnol. J. 4, 880-887 (2009).</li><li>Edwards, R. W., Hartman, E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+simple+technique+for+collecting+fungus+specimens+from+infected+surfaces.">A simple technique for collecting fungus specimens from infected surfaces.</a> Lloydia. 15, 39-39 (1952).</li><li>Evancho, G. M., Sveum, W. H., Moberg, L. J., Frank, J. F., Pouch Downes, F., Ito, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Microbiological+monitoring+of+the+food+processing+environment.">Microbiological monitoring of the food processing environment.</a> Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. , (2001).</li><li>Fung, D. Y. C., Lee, C. Y., Kastner, C. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Adhesive+tape+method+for+estimating+microbial+load+on+meat+surfaces.">Adhesive tape method for estimating microbial load on meat surfaces.</a> J. Food. Prot. 43, 295-297 (1980).</li><li>Kutter, S., Hartmann, A., Schmid, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Colonization+of+barley+(Hordeum+vulgare)+with+Salmonella+enterica+and+Listeria+spp.">Colonization of barley (Hordeum vulgare) with Salmonella enterica and Listeria spp.</a> FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 56, 262-271 (2006).</li><li>La Cono, V., Urz, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Fluorescent+in+situ+hybridization+applied+on+samples+taken+with+adhesive+tape+strips.">Fluorescent in situ hybridization applied on samples taken with adhesive tape strips.</a> J. Microbiol. Meth. 55, 65-71 (2003).</li><li>Lakshmanan, C., Schaffner, D. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Understanding+and+controlling+microbiological+contamination+of+beverage+dispensers+in+university+foodservice+operations.">Understanding and controlling microbiological contamination of beverage dispensers in university foodservice operations.</a> Food Prot. Trends. 26, 27-31 (2005).</li><li>Langvad, F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+simple+and+rapid+method+for+qualitative+and+quantitative+study+of+the+fungal+flora+of+leaves.">A simple and rapid method for qualitative and quantitative study of the fungal flora of leaves.</a> Can. J. Microbiol. 26, 666-670 (1980).</li><li>Nordentoft, S., Christensen, H., Wegener, H. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Evaluation+of+a+fluorescence-labelled+oligonucleotide+probe+targeting+23S+rRNA+for+in+situ+detection+of+Salmonella+serovars+in+paraffin-embedded+tissue+sections+and+their+rapid+identification+in+bacterial+smears.">Evaluation of a fluorescence-labelled oligonucleotide probe targeting 23S rRNA for in situ detection of Salmonella serovars in paraffin-embedded tissue sections and their rapid identification in bacterial smears.</a> J. Clin. Microbiol. 35, 2642-2648 (1997).</li></ol>

No conflicts of interest declared.

Simple and rapid methods for detection of pathogens on produce surfaces may help mitigate foodborne disease by providing timely and actionable data. Adhesive tape-based sampling methods have been used in environmental, clinical and food microbiology since the 1950's and involve pressing of "Scotch"-style tape to surfaces for removal of microorganisms, followed by direct microscopic examination or transfer of adherent microorganisms to solid media for growth (Barnetson &amp; Milne, 1973; Edwards &amp; Hartman, 1952; Evanc...

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">	
		
		<div>
		<table border="1">
		<thead>
		<tr>
		<th>Material Name</th>
		<th>Type</th>
		<th>Company</th>
		<th>Catalogue Number</th>
		<th>Comment</th>
		</tr>
		</thead>
		<tbody>
		
<tr>
<td>Fungi-Tape sampling tape</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Scientific Device Laboratory, Des Plaines, IL</td>
<td>745</td>
<td>http://www.scientificdevice.com/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Con-Tact-It sampling tape</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Birko Corporation, Denver, CO</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>http://www.birkocorp.com/</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Clear office tape, generic</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Various suppliers</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Should be optically clear, have low intrinsic fluorescence</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Food surface</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Local grocery</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Tomatoes (red tomatoes on the vine, not waxed or oiled) used here</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Trypticase Soy Broth</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Difco, Sparks, MD</td>
<td>211768</td>
<td>For non-selective liquid surface miniculture enrichment</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Xylose-lysine-Tergitol 4 agar base</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Difco, Sparks, MD</td>
<td>223420</td>
<td>For Salmonella-selective agar (XLT-4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Xylose-lysine-Tergitol 4 agar supplement</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Difco, Sparks, MD</td>
<td>235310</td>
<td>For Salmonella-selective agar (XLT-4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Formalin solution </td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>HT5011</td>
<td>10% solution, neutral, buffered (cell fixative)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Absolute ethanol</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>E7023</td>
<td>Molecular biology grade (pre-hybridization dehydration)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Various suppliers</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>RNase- and DNase-free</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microscope slides and cover slips</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<tr>
<td>NaCl solution</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>S5150</td>
<td>Molecular biology grade, 5M solution (hybridization buffer component)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tris-EDTA buffer solution (100X concentrate)</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>T9285</td>
<td>1M Tris [pH 8.0], 0.1M EDTA (hybridization buffer component)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sodium dodecyl sulfate solution</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO</td>
<td>L4522</td>
<td>10% solution in 18 megohm water (hybridization buffer component)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sal3 and Salm-63 oligonucleotide probes</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>5&#x2019;-labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) or Texas Red (for microscopy) or Cy5 (for cytometry), HPLC-purified</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Variable speed microcentrifuge</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Various suppliers</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Use rotor diameter to calculate RPM needed for RCF values described in protocol</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CoverWell perfusion chamber </td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Grace Bio-Labs Inc., Bend, OR</td>
<td>PC1R-2.0</td>
<td>Non-sterile</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gel loading pipette tips (FS MultiFlex)</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA</td>
<td>05-408-151</td>
<td>Long, thin tips for easy access to small sampling ports and maneuverability within chamber</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Aluminum heat block or precision-controlled heating station</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Various suppliers</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Eppendorf Thermomixer R dry block heating and cooling shaker used here</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bambino mini hybridization oven</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Boekel Scientific, Feasterville, PA</td>
<td>Model 230300</td>
<td>Slides are placed in 50 ml polypropylene centrifuge tubes for hybridization, heat transfer not direct</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Slide Moat slide hybridizer</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Boekel Scientific, Feasterville, PA</td>
<td>Model 240000</td>
<td>Provides rapid, direct transmission of heat through glass slide</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vectashield H-1200 mounting medium with 4&#x2019;,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Vector Laboratories, Inc., Burlingame, CA</td>
<td>H-1200</td>
<td>Minimizes quenching of fluorescence during microscopy, provides DAPI counterstain</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fluorescence microscope</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Various suppliers </td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Leitz Laborlux S used here</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Digital camera</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Various suppliers</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Canon PowerShot A640 camera used here</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Image acquisition software</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Various suppliers</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Axiovision software v. 4.6 (Carl Zeiss) used</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Adobe Photoshop</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Adobe Inc.</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>For minimal processing of images (overlay of images taken in different channels)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Flow cytometer</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Various suppliers</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>FACSCanto flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) with red (647 nm) excitation used</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Flow cytometry analysis software</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Various suppliers</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>FlowJo software v. 8.7.1 (Tree Star, Inc.) used</td>
</tr>		</tbody>
		</table>
		</div>

combination of adhesive-tape-based sampling and fluorescence in situ hybridization for rapid detection of salmonella on fresh produce

This protocol describes a simple approach for adhesive-tape-based sampling of tomato and other fresh produce surfaces, followed by on-tape fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for rapid culture-independent detection of Salmonella spp. Cell-charged tapes can also be placed face-down on selective agar for solid-phase enrichment prior to detection. Alternatively, low-volume liquid enrichments (liquid surface miniculture) can be performed on the surface of the tape in non-selective broth, followed by FISH and analysis via flow cytometry. To begin, sterile adhesive tape is brought into contact with fresh produce, gentle pressure is applied, and the tape is removed, physically extracting microbes present on these surfaces. Tapes are mounted sticky-side up onto glass microscope slides and the sampled cells are fixed with 10% formalin (30 min) and dehydrated using a graded ethanol series (50, 80, and 95%; 3 min each concentration). Next, cell-charged tapes are spotted with buffer containing a Salmonella-targeted DNA probe cocktail and hybridized for 15 - 30 min at 55&deg;C, followed by a brief rinse in a washing buffer to remove unbound probe. Adherent, FISH-labeled cells are then counterstained with the DNA dye 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and results are viewed using fluorescence microscopy. For solid-phase enrichment, cell-charged tapes are placed face-down on a suitable selective agar surface and incubated to allow in situ growth of Salmonella microcolonies, followed by FISH and microscopy as described above. For liquid surface miniculture, cell-charged tapes are placed sticky side up and a silicone perfusion chamber is applied so that the tape and microscope slide form the bottom of a water-tight chamber into which a small volume (&le; 500 &mu;L) of Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) is introduced. The inlet ports are sealed and the chambers are incubated at 35 - 37&deg;C, allowing growth-based amplification of tape-extracted microbes. Following incubation, inlet ports are unsealed, cells are detached and mixed with vigorous back and forth pipetting, harvested via centrifugation and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Finally, samples are hybridized and examined via flow cytometry to reveal the presence of Salmonella spp. As described here, our "tape-FISH" approach can provide simple and rapid sampling and detection of Salmonella on tomato surfaces. We have also used this approach for sampling other types of fresh produce, including spinach and jalape&ntilde;o peppers.

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Combination of Adhesive-tape-based Sampling and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization for Rapid Detection of Salmonella on Fresh Produce at JoVE.com

Combination of Adhesive-tape-based Sampling and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization for Rapid Detection of Salmonella on Fresh Produce

This protocol describes a simple adhesive-tape-based approach for sampling of tomato and other fresh produce surfaces, followed by rapid whole cell detection of Salmonella using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Combination of Adhesive-tape-based Sampling and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization for Rapid Detection of Salmonella on Fresh Produce

This protocol describes a simple approach for adhesive-tape-based sampling of tomato and other fresh produce surfaces, followed by on-tape fluorescence in ...

combination-adhesive-tape-based-sampling-fluorescence-situ

Research

JoVE Journal

Immunology and Infection

12.9K Views.  Colorado State University. This protocol describes a simple adhesive-tape-based approach for sampling of tomato and other fresh produce surfaces, followed by rapid whole cell detection of Salmonella using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).

Video: Combination of Adhesive-tape-based Sampling and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization for Rapid Detection of Salmonella on Fresh Produce

Locked Nucleic Acid Flow Cytometry-fluorescence in situ Hybridization (LNA flow-FISH): a Method for Bacterial Small RNA Detection

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful technique that is used to detect and localize specific nucleic acid sequences in the cellular environment. In order to increase throughput, FISH can be combined with flow cytometry (flow-FISH) to enable the detection of targeted nucleic acid sequences in thousands of individual cells. As a result, flow-FISH offers a distinct advantage over lysate/ensemble-based nucleic acid detection methods because each cell is treated as an independent observation, thereby permitting stronger statistical and variance analyses. These attributes have prompted the use of FISH and flow-FISH methods in a number of different applications and the utility of these methods has been successfully demonstrated in telomere length determination1,2, cellular identification and gene expression3,4, monitoring viral multiplication in infected cells5, and bacterial community analysis and enumeration6.
Traditionally, the specificity of FISH and flow-FISH methods has been imparted by DNA oligonucleotide probes. Recently however, the replacement of DNA oligonucleotide probes with nucleic acid analogs as FISH and flow-FISH probes has increased both the sensitivity and specificity of each technique due to the higher melting temperatures (Tm) of these analogs for natural nucleic acids7,8. Locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes are a type of nucleic acid analog that contain LNA nucleotides spiked throughout a DNA or RNA sequence9,10. When coupled with flow-FISH, LNA probes have previously been shown to outperform conventional DNA probes7,11 and have been successfully used to detect eukaryotic mRNA12 and viral RNA in mammalian cells5.
Here we expand this capability and describe a LNA flow-FISH method which permits the specific detection of RNA in bacterial cells (Figure 1). Specifically, we are interested in the detection of small non-coding regulatory RNA (sRNA) which have garnered considerable interest in the past few years as they have been found to serve as key regulatory elements in many critical cellular processes13. However, there are limited tools to study sRNAs and the challenges of detecting sRNA in bacterial cells is due in part to the relatively small size (typically 50-300 nucleotides in length) and low abundance of sRNA molecules as well as the general difficulty in working with smaller biological cells with varying cellular membranes. In this method, we describe fixation and permeabilzation conditions that preserve the structure of bacterial cells and permit the penetration of LNA probes as well as signal amplification steps which enable the specific detection of low abundance sRNA (Figure 2).

Locked Nucleic Acid Flow Cytometry-fluorescence in situ Hybridization LNA flow-FISH: a Method for Bacterial Small RNA Detection

A novel high-throughput method is described that enables the detection and relative quantitation of small RNA and mRNA expression from single bacterial cells using locked nucleic acid probes and flow cytometry-fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful technique that is used to detect and localize specific nucleic acid sequences in the cellular ...

Hybridization in situ of Salivary Glands, Ovaries, and Embryos of Vector Mosquitoes

Mosquitoes are vectors for a diverse set of pathogens including arboviruses, protozoan parasites and nematodes. Investigation of transcripts and gene regulators that are expressed in tissues in which the mosquito host and pathogen interact, and in organs involved in reproduction are of great interest for strategies to reduce mosquito-borne disease transmission and disrupt egg development. A number of tools have been employed to study and validate the temporal and tissue-specific regulation of gene expression. Here, we describe protocols that have been developed to obtain spatial information, which enhances our understanding of where specific genes are expressed and their products accumulate. The protocol described has been used to validate expression and determine accumulation patterns of transcripts in tissues related to mosquito-borne pathogen transmission, such as female salivary glands, as well as subcellular compartments of ovaries and embryos, which relate to mosquito reproduction and development. 
 The following procedures represent an optimized methodology that improves the efficiency of various steps in the protocol without loss of target-specific hybridization signals. Guidelines for RNA probe preparation, dissection of soft tissues and the general procedure for fixation and hybridization are described in Part A, while steps specific for the collection, fixation, pre-hybridization and hybridization of mosquito embryos are detailed in Part B.

Hybridization in situ of Salivary Glands, Ovaries, and Embryos of Vector Mosquitoes

Temporal and spatial gene expression analyses have a crucial role in functional genomics. Whole-mount hybridization in situ is useful for determining the localization of transcripts within tissues and subcellular compartments. Here we outline a hybridization in situ protocol with modifications for specific target tissues in mosquitoes.

Mosquitoes are vectors for a diverse set of pathogens including arboviruses, protozoan parasites and nematodes.  Investigation of transcripts and gene ...

Fluorescent in situ Hybridization on Mitotic Chromosomes of Mosquitoes

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is a technique routinely used by many laboratories to determine the chromosomal position of DNA and RNA probes. One important application of this method is the development of high-quality physical maps useful for improving the genome assemblies for various organisms. The natural banding pattern of polytene and mitotic chromosomes provides guidance for the precise ordering and orientation of the genomic supercontigs. Among the three mosquito genera, namely Anopheles, Aedes, and Culex, a well-established chromosome-based mapping technique has been developed only for Anopheles, whose members possess readable polytene chromosomes 1. As a result of genome mapping efforts, 88% of the An. gambiae genome has been placed to precise chromosome positions 2,3 . Two other mosquito genera, Aedes and Culex, have poorly polytenized chromosomes because of significant overrepresentation of transposable elements in their genomes 4, 5, 6. Only 31 and 9% of the genomic supercontings have been assigned without order or orientation to chromosomes of Ae. aegypti 7 and Cx. quinquefasciatus 8, respectively. Mitotic chromosome preparation for these two species had previously been limited to brain ganglia and cell lines. However, chromosome slides prepared from the brain ganglia of mosquitoes usually contain low numbers of metaphase plates 9. Also, although a FISH technique has been developed for mitotic chromosomes from a cell line of Ae. aegypti 10, the accumulation of multiple chromosomal rearrangements in cell line chromosomes 11 makes them useless for genome mapping. Here we describe a simple, robust technique for obtaining high-quality mitotic chromosome preparations from imaginal discs (IDs) of 4th instar larvae which can be used for all three genera of mosquitoes. A standard FISH protocol 12 is optimized for using BAC clones of genomic DNA as a probe on mitotic chromosomes of Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus, and for utilizing an intergenic spacer (IGS) region of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) as a probe on An. gambiae chromosomes. In addition to physical mapping, the developed technique can be applied to population cytogenetics and chromosome taxonomy/systematics of mosquitoes and other insect groups.

Fluorescent in situ Hybridization on Mitotic Chromosomes of Mosquitoes

Among the three mosquito genera, namely Anopheles, Aedes, and Culex, physical genome mapping techniques were established only for Anopheles, whose members possess readable polytene chromosomes. For the genera of Aedes and Culex, however, cytogenetic mapping remains challenging because of the poor quality of polytene chromosomes. Here we present a universal protocol for obtaining high-quality preparations of mitotic chromosomes and an optimized FISH protocol for all three genera of mosquitoes.

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is a technique routinely used by many laboratories to determine the chromosomal position of DNA and RNA probes. ...

Fluorescence in situ Hybridizations (FISH) for the Localization of Viruses and Endosymbiotic Bacteria in Plant and Insect Tissues

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a name given to a variety of techniques commonly used for visualizing gene transcripts in eukaryotic cells and can be further modified to visualize other components in the cell such as infection with viruses and bacteria. Spatial localization and visualization of viruses and bacteria during the infection process is an essential step that complements expression profiling experiments such as microarrays and RNAseq in response to different stimuli. Understanding the spatiotemporal infections with these agents complements biological experiments aimed at understanding their interaction with cellular components. Several techniques for visualizing viruses and bacteria such as reporter gene systems or immunohistochemical methods are time-consuming, and some are limited to work with model organisms&#160;and involve complex methodologies. FISH that targets RNA or DNA species in the cell is a relatively easy and fast method for studying spatiotemporal localization of genes and for diagnostic purposes. This method can be robust and relatively easy to implement when the protocols employ short hybridizing, commercially-purchased probes, which are not expensive. This is particularly robust when sample preparation, fixation, hybridization, and microscopic visualization do not involve complex steps. Here we describe a protocol for localization of bacteria and viruses in insect and plant tissues. The method is based on simple preparation, fixation, and hybridization of insect whole mounts and dissected organs or hand-made plant sections, with 20 base pairs short DNA probes conjugated to fluorescent dyes on their 5&#39; or 3&#39; ends. This protocol has been successfully applied to a number of insect and plant tissues, and can be used to analyze expression of mRNAs or other RNA or DNA species in the cell.

Fluorescence in situ Hybridizations FISH for the Localization of Viruses and Endosymbiotic Bacteria in Plant and Insect Tissues

We describe here a simple fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method for the localization of viruses and bacteria in insect and plant tissues. This protocol can be extended for the visualization of mRNA in whole mount and microscopic sections.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a name given to a variety of techniques commonly used for visualizing gene transcripts in eukaryotic cells ...

Swab Sampling Method for the Detection of Human Norovirus on Surfaces

Human noroviruses are a leading cause of epidemic and sporadic gastroenteritis worldwide. Because most infections are either spread directly via the person-to-person route or indirectly through environmental surfaces or food, contaminated fomites and inanimate surfaces are important vehicles for the spread of the virus during norovirus outbreaks.
We developed and evaluated a protocol using macrofoam swabs for the detection and typing of human noroviruses from hard surfaces. Compared with fiber-tipped swabs or antistatic wipes, macrofoam swabs allow virus recovery (range 1.2-33.6%) from toilet seat surfaces of up to 700 cm2. The protocol includes steps for the extraction of the virus from the swabs and further concentration of the viral RNA using spin columns. In total, 127 (58.5%) of 217 swab samples that had been collected from surfaces in cruise ships and long-term care facilities where norovirus gastroenteritis had been reported tested positive for GII norovirus by RT-qPCR. Of these 29 (22.8%) could be successfully genotyped. In conclusion, detection of norovirus on environmental surfaces using the protocol we developed may assist in determining the level of environmental contamination during outbreaks as well as detection of virus when clinical samples are not available; it may also facilitate monitoring of effectiveness of remediation strategies.

A macrofoam based sampling methodology was developed and evaluated for the detection and quantification of norovirus on environmental hard surfaces.

Human noroviruses are a leading cause of epidemic and sporadic gastroenteritis worldwide. Because most infections are either spread directly via the ...

Fluorescence-based Neuraminidase Inhibition Assay to Assess the Susceptibility of Influenza Viruses to The Neuraminidase Inhibitor Class of Antivirals

The neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors are the only class of antivirals approved for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza that are effective against currently circulating strains. In addition to their use in treating seasonal influenza, the NA inhibitors have been stockpiled by a number of countries for use in the event of a pandemic. It is therefore important to monitor the susceptibility of circulating influenza viruses to this class of antivirals. There are different types of assays that can be used to assess the susceptibility of influenza viruses to the NA inhibitors, but the enzyme inhibition assays using either a fluorescent substrate or a chemiluminescent substrate are the most widely used and recommended. This protocol describes the use of a fluorescence-based assay to assess influenza virus susceptibility to NA inhibitors. The assay is based on the NA enzyme cleaving the 2&#8242;-(4-Methylumbelliferyl)-&#945;-D-N-acetylneuraminic acid (MUNANA) substrate to release the fluorescent product 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU). Therefore, the inhibitory effect of an NA inhibitor on the influenza virus NA is determined based on the concentration of the NA inhibitor that is required to reduce 50% of the NA activity, given as an IC50 value.

We describe the use of a phenotypic fluorescence-based neuraminidase inhibition assay to assess the susceptibility of influenza A and B viruses to the neuraminidase inhibitor class of antivirals.

The neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors are the only class of antivirals approved for the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza that are effective against ...

Noninvasive Sampling of Mucosal Lining Fluid for the Quantification of In Vivo Upper Airway Immune-mediator Levels

This protocol describes noninvasive sampling of undisturbed upper airway mucosal lining fluid. It also details the extraction procedure used prior to the analysis of immune mediators in fluid eluates for the study of the airway topical immune signature, without the need for stimulation procedures (often used by other techniques). The mucosal lining fluid is sampled on a strip of filter paper placed at the anterior part of the inferior turbinate and left for 2 min of absorption. Analytes are eluted from the filter papers, and the extracted protein-based eluates are analyzed by an electrochemiluminescence-based immunoassay, allowing for the high-sensitivity quantification of low- and high-level analytes in the same sample. We measured the in vivo levels of 20 preselected immune mediators related to specific immune signaling pathways in the upper airway mucosa, but the technique is not limited to that specific panel or sampling site. The technique was first implemented in 7-year-old children from the Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood2000 (COPSAC2000) cohort with allergic rhinitis. It was thereafter used in the longitudinal COPSAC2010 birth cohort, sampled at 1 month, 2 years, and 6 years of age and at instances of acute respiratory symptoms. We successfully obtained and analyzed samples from 620 (89%) of 700 1-month-old children; a few samples were below the assay detection limit (reported as the median (Inter-Quartile Range (IQR)). The number of samples below the detection limit (i.e.&#160;from 0 to the set point for the lower limit of detection) for each mediator was 29 (7.25 - 119.5). This technique enables the quantification of the in vivo airway mucosal immune profile from birth, can be applied longitudinally, and can be applied to studies on the effect of genetics and early-life environmental exposures, pathophysiology, endotyping, and monitoring of respiratory diseases, and development and evaluation of novel therapeutics.

Noninvasive Sampling of Mucosal Lining Fluid for the Quantification of In Vivo Upper Airway Immune-mediator Levels

This protocol describes a noninvasive technique for the sampling of undisturbed mucosal lining fluid from the upper airways. It can be used to perform the quantification of in vivo levels of protein mediators, such as cytokines and chemokines, in subjects of all ages.

This protocol describes noninvasive sampling of undisturbed upper airway mucosal lining fluid. It also details the extraction procedure used prior to the ...

Isolation of Salmonella typhimurium-containing Phagosomes from Macrophages

Salmonella typhimurium is a facultative intracellular bacterium that causes gastroenteritis in humans. After invasion of the lamina propria, S. typhimurium bacteria are quickly detected and phagocytized by macrophages, and contained in vesicles known as phagosomes in order to be degraded. Isolation of S. typhimurium-containing phagosomes have been widely used to study how S. typhimurium infection alters the process of phagosome maturation to prevent bacterial degradation. Classically, the isolation of bacteria-containing phagosomes has been performed by sucrose gradient centrifugation. However, this process is time-consuming, and requires specialized equipment and a certain degree of dexterity. Described here is a simple and quick method for the isolation of S. typhimurium-containing phagosomes from macrophages by coating the bacteria with biotin-streptavidin-conjugated magnetic beads. Phagosomes obtained by this method can be suspended in any buffer of choice, allowing the utilization of isolated phagosomes for a broad range of assays, such as protein, metabolite, and lipid analysis. In summary, this method for the isolation of S. typhimurium-containing phagosomes is specific, efficient, rapid, requires minimum equipment, and is more versatile than the classical method of isolation by sucrose gradient-ultracentrifugation.

Isolation of Salmonella typhimurium-containing Phagosomes from Macrophages

We describe here a simple and quick method for the isolation of Salmonella typhimurium-containing phagosomes from macrophages by coating the bacteria with biotin and streptavidin.

Salmonella typhimurium is a facultative intracellular bacterium that causes gastroenteritis in humans. After invasion of the lamina propria, S. ...

A High-throughput Platform for the Screening of Salmonella spp./Shigella spp.

Fecal-oral transmission of acute gastroenteritis occurs from time to time, especially when people who handled food and water are infected by Salmonella spp./Shigella spp. The gold standard method for the detection of Salmonella spp./Shigella spp. is direct culture but this is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Here, we describe a high-throughput platform for Salmonella spp./Shigella spp. screening, using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) combined with guided culture. There are two major stages: real-time PCR and the guided culture. For the first stage (real-time PCR), we explain each step of the method: sample collection, pre-enrichment, DNA extraction and real-time PCR. If the real-time PCR result is positive, then the second stage (guided culture) is performed: selective culture, biochemical identification and serological characterization. We also illustrate representative results generated from it. The protocol described here would be a valuable platform for the rapid, specific, sensitive and high-throughput screening of Salmonella spp./Shigella spp.

A High-throughput Platform for the Screening of Salmonella spp./Shigella spp.

Salmonella spp./Shigella spp. are common pathogens attributed to diarrhea. Here, we describe a high-throughput platform for the screening of Salmonella spp./Shigella spp. using real-time PCR combined with guided culture.

Fecal-oral transmission of acute gastroenteritis occurs from time to time, especially when people who handled food and water are infected by Salmonella ...

Quantitative Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and Immunofluorescence (IF) of Specific Gene Products in KSHV-Infected Cells

Mechanistic insight arrives from careful study and quantification of specific RNAs and proteins. The relative locations of these biomolecules throughout the cell at specific times can be captured with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunofluorescence (IF). During lytic herpesvirus infection, the virus hijacks the host cell to preferentially express viral genes, causing changes in cell morphology and behavior of biomolecules. Lytic activities are centered in nuclear factories, termed viral replication compartments, which are discernable only with FISH and IF. Here we describe an adaptable protocol of RNA FISH and IF techniques for Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV)-infected cells, both adherent and in suspension. The method includes steps for the development of specific anti-sense oligonucleotides, double RNA FISH, RNA FISH with IF, and quantitative calculations of fluorescence intensities. This protocol has been successfully applied to multiple cell types, uninfected cells, latent cells, lytic cells, time-courses, and cells treated with inhibitors to analyze the spatiotemporal activities of specific RNAs and proteins from both the human host and KSHV.

Quantitative Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization FISH and Immunofluorescence IF of Specific Gene Products in KSHV-Infected Cells

We describe a protocol utilizing fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to visualize multiple herpesviral RNAs within lytically infected human cells, either in suspension or adherent. This protocol includes quantification of fluorescence producing a nucleocytoplasmic ratio and can be extended for simultaneous visualization of host and viral proteins with immunofluorescence (IF).

Mechanistic insight arrives from careful study and quantification of specific RNAs and proteins. The relative locations of these biomolecules throughout ...