Name: immobilization of multi-biocatalysts in alginate beads for cofactor regeneration and improved reusability
Uploaded: 2016-04-22T15:00:00
Description: We have recently developed a simple, reusable and coupled whole-cell biocatalytic system with the capability of cofactor regeneration and biocatalyst ...

1. Whole-cell Biocatalysts Preparation &#160;
NOTE: The recombinant E. coli cells harboring pET28a-SpNox31 or pET28a-HjLAD28 are hereafter referred to as E. coliSpNox and E. coliHjLAD, respectively.
<ol>
	<li>Inoculate a single colony of E. coliHjLAD in 3 ml&#160;of Luria-Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 &#181;g/ml) and incubate in an incubator shaker O/N at 37 oC, 250 rpm.</li>
	<li>Dilute the culture by 1:100 in 200 ml&#160;of fresh LB containing 50 &#181;g/ml&#160;kanamycin and incubate at 37 oC, 250 rpm until the OD600 reaches ~0.6.</li>
	<li>Induce HjLAD protein expression by adding 0.1 mM isopropyl &#946;-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to the culture medium and incubate at 16 oC, 180 rpm for 16 hr.
	<ol>
		<li>Alternatively, perform induction at 25 oC, 200 rpm for 6 hr&#160;if the L-xylulose biosynthesis (Step 2 below) is performed the same day.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Harvest the induced E. coliHjLAD cells by centrifugation at 3,200 x g for 20 min at 4 oC. Discard the supernatant and proceed to Step 2 to process the cell pellet.</li>
	<li>In parallel, perform steps 1.1 - 1.4 for E. coliSpNox.</li>
</ol>
2. Biosynthesis of L-xylulose by Coupling E. coliHjLAD and E. coliSpNox for Cofactor Regeneration
<ol>
	<li>Resuspend the cell pellets of E. coliHjLAD and E. coliSpNox separately in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) at a cell density of 5.0 g dry cell weight (gDCW)/L. 
	Note: A correlation between gDCW and the optical density measured at 600 nm (OD600) can be established to facilitate the experiment. The formula used in this protocol is 1 gDCW/L=0.722*OD600 - 0.0965, which can vary among different spectrometers.</li>
	<li>Mix 600 &#181;l&#160;of 5.0 gDCW/L E. coliHjLAD, 600 &#181;l&#160;of 5.0 gDCW/L E. coliSpNox, 100 &#181;l&#160;of 20 mM NAD+, and 150 &#181;l&#160;of 2 M L-arabinitol in a 14&#160;ml&#160;round-bottom tube and bring the reaction volume to 2 ml&#160;by adding 550 &#181;l&#160;of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). 
	Note: The ratio of the two whole-cell biocatalysts amount can be optimized to improve the biosynthesis of the product. For the described system, a ratio of E. coliSpNox:E. coliHjLAD = 1:1 was found to be optimal for L-xylulose biosynthesis (Figure 1B).</li>
	<li>Incubate the reaction mixture at 30 oC, 200 rpm for 8 hr.</li>
	<li>Collect the supernatant after centrifugation at 4 oC, 3,200 x g for 10 min and proceed to quantify the L-xylulose production as described in Step 3 below.</li>
</ol>
3. Colorimetric Assay for L-xylulose Quantification
<ol>
	<li>Aspirate 100 &#181;l&#160;of the reaction supernatant collected from step 2.4 into a 1.5 ml&#160;tube.</li>
	<li>Add 50 &#181;l&#160;of 1.5% cysteine, 900 &#181;l&#160;of 70% sulfuric acid, and 50 &#181;l&#160;of 0.1 % carbazole dissolved in ethanol and mix gently by inverting the tube 3 times.</li>
	<li>Incubate the reaction mixture at 37 oC, 200 rpm for 20 min.</li>
	<li>Measure the optical absorbance of the reaction mixture at 560 nm (A560) using a spectrophotometer.
	<ol>
		<li>Dilute the reaction mixture if the A560 reading is above 1.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
4. Immobilization of Recombinant Whole-cell Catalysts in Calcium Alginate Beads
<ol>
	<li>Dissolve 4 g sodium alginate in 100 ml&#160;of distilled water. Prepare alginate solution by adding sodium alginate to water to avoid the formation of clumps. Heat the mixture if needed.</li>
	<li>Add 600 &#181;l&#160;of 5.0 gDCW/L E. coliHjLAD and 600 &#181;l&#160;of 5.0 gDCW/L E. coliSpNox in 1.2 ml&#160;4% alginate prepared in step 4.1 and mix the cells and alginate by gentle pipetting to avoid bubble formation.</li>
	<li>Aspirate the alginate/cell suspension into a syringe using a needle and add the mixture drop-wise into a 0.3 M calcium chloride (CaCl2) solution in a 100 ml&#160;beaker with continuous stirring. 
	Note: The volume of CaCl2 solution used for alginate bead formation should be enough for the alginate droplets to be completely submerged. Additionally, the distance between the syringe needle and the surface of the calcium chloride solution must be maintained within an optimal range to ensure formation of uniformly spherical beads. The optimum distance range can be determined experimentally and depends on the inner diameter of the needle. As an estimate, a distance of ~15 &#177; 5 cm was found to be optimal for a 0.6 cm (inner diameter) syringe needle.</li>
	<li>Leave the beads in the CaCl2 solution for 2 - 3 hr&#160;at RT without stirring to allow crosslinking and gel beads formation.</li>
	<li>Decant the CaCl2 solution without disturbing the beads by carefully pouring the CaCl2 solution into a 50 ml&#160;conical tube, and transfer the remaining beads in CaCl2 solution into another 50 ml&#160;conical tube.</li>
	<li>Wash the beads with 10 ml&#160;of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) buffer three times to remove excessive CaCl2 and un-encapsulated cells. 
	NOTE: At any given step, do not centrifuge the beads as doing so will rupture them. To separate the beads from solution, allow the suspension to stand undisturbed for 3 - 5 min. The beads will settle at the bottom and the wash buffer can be decanted into another container.
	<ol>
		<li>Do not discard the used wash buffer. Pool the used Tris-HCl wash buffer (30 ml) with the used CaCl2 solution collected from step 4.5.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Pellet the un-immobilized E. coli cells by centrifugation of the pooled CaCl2 and Tris-HCl solution collected from step 4.6 at 3,200 x g for 20 min. To determine the immobilization efficiency, calculate the density of the pelleted un-encapsulated cells in gDCW/L as described in step 2.1.</li>
	<li>Transfer the washed beads from step 4.6 into a tube. Follow steps 2.2 - 3.4 to evaluate the L-xylulose biosynthesis using all of the washed beads in place of cell pellets.</li>
</ol>
5. Stability Assay of Immobilized Biocatalysts for L-xylulose Production
<ol>
	<li>Collect the beads from step 4.8 and wash twice with 10 ml&#160;of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) buffer without centrifugation (as described in Step 4.6).</li>
	<li>Use all of the washed beads to perform the reaction as described in steps 2.2 - 3.4.</li>
	<li>Repeat steps 5.1 -&#160;5.2 for desired number of production cycles and measure the amount of L-xylulose produced in the reaction supernatant in each cycle.</li>
</ol>

Recent technological advancements have enabled a surge in the commercialization of recombinant biotherapeutics, resulting in a gradual rise in their market value in the biotechnology industry. One such advancement is the advent of metabolic engineering in recombinant microorganisms, which has shown a great promise in establishing scalable industrial systems38. As with most processes, the successful commercialization of recombinant biomolecules produced by genetically engineered microbes is highly dependent on the production yield of the system39. This has led to the rapid development of &#34;brute force&#34; genetics39, where directed evolution of biocatalytic enzymes has been implemented in order to improve biocatalyst activity3. However, for certain metabolic pathways, such as redox pathways, mere biocatalyst improvement is not sufficient to influence economization of production owing to the significant effect of other essential reaction requirements, such as expensive cofactors. Scale-up of such a system, even with improved biocatalysts, will only serve to increase production costs. Thus, additional strategic methods are required for the commercialization of bioreactions involving stoichiometric ratios of cofactors. In addition, the recyclability of a biocatalyst is also necessary for improving the economic feasibility of a bioprocess. To overcome the limiting effect of rapid cofactor consumption and poor reusability of whole-cell biocatalysts, we have previously developed an immobilized, coupled whole-cell biocatalytic system for cofactor regeneration and stable re-use16. Described in the present study are the experimental procedures required to couple and co-immobilize two whole-cell biocatalysts for improved biotransformation yield and reusability, along with the representative results.
A critical factor to be considered for coupling the whole-cell biocatalysts is the maintenance of a precise control over the conditions established for protein induction and biocatalytic product formation to ensure reproducibility of the system. Variations in parameters like induction OD600, induction time, and IPTG concentration should be avoided to minimize batch-to-batch variation. Additionally, re-evaluation of the cell-to-cell ratio is required for different biotransformations. Note that the E. coliHjLAD:E. coliSpNox ratio of 1:1 reported in this study was determined by experimental optimization rather than the theoretical stoichiometric ratio. For immobilization of the recombinant whole-cell biocatalysts in calcium alginate beads, there are several critical steps to ensure uniformity with regard to the bead rigidity and distribution of cells. Firstly, the alginate solution must be prepared by slowly adding sodium alginate into water, and not vice versa to prevent clumping that could affect the local alginate concentration and thus the extent of cross-linking. Secondly, gentle pipetting should be employed when handling the cell-alginate suspension to avoid the formation of air bubbles, which inflict shear stress on the encapsulated cells, impede efficient mass transfer and can even cause the beads to float. In case air bubbles are introduced into the suspension, allow the cell-alginate suspension to stand undisturbed for 20 - 30 min&#160;to let the bubbles escape. Thirdly, when making the beads, the cell-alginate suspension must be added slowly and carefully in a drop-wise manner into a sufficient volume of calcium chloride solution for uniform size and morphology. Beads submerged incompletely in calcium chloride will have an irregular shape and poor rigidity that can contribute to cell leakage. Lastly, to avoid variability in the reaction volume from residual wash buffer, the beads in Step 4.8 can be lightly blotted with filter paper (do not air dry).
Common strategies for cofactor regeneration include co-culture of cells harboring functionally complementary enzymes and co-expression of these enzymes in the same cell. The described system employs a different strategy of coupling separate E. coliSpNox and E. coliHjLAD cell cultures, offering a better control in maintaining a desired ratio between the two enzymes. Additionally, cells expressing single proteins are subjected to less stress than those co-expressing multiple proteins, which could lead to reduced protein misfolding and increased protein expression40,41. Thus, direct whole-cell coupling presents the ability to mediate multi-enzyme catalytic processes without significantly compromising product yield. However, established strategies such as careful selection of bacterial promoters with varying strength42,43 and improvements in ribosome binding sites44 can be employed to mitigate the limited control over the ratio of target enzymes in co-culture or co-expression systems. Among the many immobilization techniques, encapsulation presents multiple advantages for immobilizing whole-cell biocatalysts over alternative methods such as cross-linking and adsorption, which are more suited for purified enzymes. Encapsulation of cells can also be performed in a variety of biomaterials like agar, chitosan, gums, carrageenan, gelatin and alginate45 for improving the reusability of the biocatalysts. However, calcium alginate encapsulation has been shown to be the most effective approach with respect to immobilization efficiency and biomolecule production46,47.
One major limitation of utilizing bacterial whole-cell biocatalysts is the minimal ability for post-translational modification of heterologous proteins in wild-type E. coli48. This restricts the successful use of eukaryotic biocatalysts within this system. An alternative to overcome this limitation could be the use of organisms such as yeast that are better equipped with eukaryotic post translational machinery. Another limitation of the described system is related to the use of immobilization for improved reusability. Immobilization is a common cost-effective strategy employed to counteract the poor stability of biocatalysts and improve their turnover rate by simplifying the bioprocess49-51. The main parameters that affect the catalytic performance of encapsulated whole-cell biocatalysts include sodium alginate concentration, CaCl2 concentration, cell loading and bead size. It is important to recognize that these parameters are not independent from each other. As such, a comprehensive analysis of all factors within a single study is very time-consuming, thus it is necessary to select the most crucial parameters for optimization. Evaluated and presented here are the effects of two parameters, sodium alginate and CaCl2 concentration. Although not discussed in detail here, we have previously performed the optimization of cell loading, comparing the dependence of yield on the weight of cells immobilized16. Reports in literature indicate that variation of bead size could also modulate the production yield by increasing enzyme encapsulation, improving activity via increased surface area of the immobilized system or by changing the diffusion of substrates and products due to altered transport properties. Depending on the biocatalytic reactions under consideration, selection of alternate critical factors may be required, which could lead to the generation of a different set of optimal conditions. A detailed study for establishment of optimal conditions for additional parameters provides scope for the further improvement in performance of the coupled whole-cell system.
In summary, we report the experimental implementation of a coupled whole-cell biocatalytic system immobilized in calcium alginate beads, illustrating the improved production of L-xylulose. By expressing different recombinant enzymes that facilitate other cofactor dependent biocatalytic pathways, high yields of many biologically relevant molecules can be obtained using the protocol described here. In addition, this system can be expanded to accommodate more than two recombinant biocatalysts for one-pot multi-enzyme biosynthesis of products52 and applications other than biocatalytic production, such as microbial biosensors for biochemical oxygen demand53. Taking advantage of the synergistic feature of this system, encapsulation of symbiotic microbial consortia can be used for a myriad of applications such as bioremediation54-56, whole-cell bioprocessing for biofuels57, plant growth promotion by soil bioaugmentation58 and biomining for metal recovery59. Taken together, the strategies of cofactor regeneration, multi-cell coupling and biocatalyst immobilization described herein can be used as a promising platform for improved production of important biomolecules pursued by others in the field.

immobilization of multi-biocatalysts in alginate beads for cofactor regeneration and improved reusability

We have recently developed a simple, reusable and coupled whole-cell biocatalytic system with the capability of cofactor regeneration and biocatalyst immobilization for improved production yield and sustained synthesis. Described herewith is the experimental procedure for the development of such a system consisting of two E. coli strains that express functionally complementary enzymes. Together, these two enzymes can function co-operatively to mediate the regeneration of expensive cofactors for improving the product yield of the bioreaction. In addition, the method of synthesizing an immobilized form of the coupled biocatalytic system by encapsulation of whole cells in calcium alginate beads is reported. As an example, we present the improved biosynthesis of L-xylulose from L-arabinitol by coupling E. coli cells expressing the enzymes L-arabinitol dehydrogenase or NADH oxidase. Under optimal conditions and using an initial concentration of 150 mM L-arabinitol, the maximal L-xylulose yield reached 96%, which is higher than those reported in the literature. The immobilized form of the coupled whole-cell biocatalysts demonstrated good operational stability, maintaining 65% of the yield obtained in the first cycle after 7 cycles of successive re-use, while the free cell system almost completely lost the catalytic activity. Therefore, the methods reported here provides two strategies that could help improve the industrial production of L-xylulose, as well as other value-added compounds requiring the use of cofactors in general.

To enable cofactor regeneration, L-xylulose synthesis was carried out in a coupled whole-cell biocatalytic system containing E. coliHjLAD and E. coliSpNox cells. Following the optimization of various parameters, the reusability of this system was improved by immobilizing it in calcium alginate beads (Figure 2).
L-xylulose Production with Cofactor Regeneration by Coupling E. coliHjLAD and E. coliSpNox&#160;cells. 
To enhance the bioconversion of L-arabinitol into L-xylulose, the E. coliHjLAD and E. coliSpNox cells were coupled to enable cofactor regeneration. To account for the differences in the protein expression and cofactor availability in E. coliSpNox and E. coliHjLAD cells, a comparison study of the L-xylulose yield at various E. coliSpNox-to-E. coliHjLAD ratios was performed. As shown in Figure 1B, the yield increased as the E. coliSpNox-to-E. coliHjLAD ratio increased from 0.13:1 to 1:1. The yields obtained for ratios 1:1 and 1.33:1 were equivalent and maximal for this coupled system. All further experiments were performed with the E. coliSpNox-to-E. coliHjLAD ratio of 1:1. Starting with an initial concentration of 150 mM L-arabinitol, the use of E. coliHjLAD biocatalyst alone produced 118 mM L-xylulose after 8 hr&#160;(saturation point for L-xylulose concentration), representing a yield of 79% (Figure 1C). In comparison, the use of the E. coliHjLAD and E. coliSpNox cells at a 1:1 ratio produced 144 mM L-xylulose, improving the yield to 96%.
Optimization of Whole-cell Biocatalyst Immobilization 
Immobilization of biocatalysts in calcium alginate beads offers many advantages, such as improved viability, as a result of the mild gel environment that protects the cells from the physical stresses in a bioreactor. The properties of these alginate beads is largely determined by formulation and processing parameters34. To optimize the production yield of L-xylulose by an immobilized form of the coupled whole-cell biocatalyst described above, two main parameters, namely sodium alginate concentration and CaCl2 concentration, were evaluated. These are the main parameters that determine the integrity and rigidity of the calcium alginate beads, which in turn affect the biocatalyst immobilization efficiency and molecular diffusion.
As shown in Figure 3A, the biocatalyst immobilization efficiency demonstrated an increasing trend with increasing sodium alginate concentration in the range of 1 - 3% (w/v). When the sodium alginate concentration used in the immobilization matrix was less than 1%, the resulting beads were fragile and easily broken due to low mechanical stability, releasing most of the cells into the surrounding CaCl2 solution (data not shown). Upon increasing the sodium alginate concentration to greater than 2%, the resulting beads hardened excessively leading to problems in molecular diffusion35&#160;(Figure 4). Varying the CaCl2 concentration yielded a similar trend in the biocatalyst immobilization efficiency. For a fixed concentration of sodium alginate (2% w/v) and in the range of 0.1 - 0.4 M CaCl2, lower CaCl2 concentrations resulted in decreased rigidity of the beads and increased leakage of cells into the surrounding solution. This is due to the limited availability of Ca2+ ions for cross-linking the guluronate blocks on the alginate polymer chains36 (Figure 3B). However, increasing the CaCl2 concentration from 0.3 M to 0.4 M improved the biocatalyst immobilization efficiency only marginally. Due to the high immobilization efficiency (&#62;90%), CaCl2 concentrations beyond 0.4 M were not evaluated. When CaCl2 concentrations of less than 0.1 M were used, the sodium alginate droplet containing the biocatalyst fell apart in the CaCl2 solution and no spherical beads were formed (data not shown).
To maximize the biocatalyst immobilization efficiency without significantly slowing down the molecular diffusion in the calcium alginate beads, the sodium alginate and CaCl2 concentration were optimized next for improved L-xylulose production. Using the same concentration range as for immobilization efficiency (1 - 3% w/v sodium alginate and 0.1 - 0.4 M CaCl2), an optimal sodium alginate concentration of 2% was observed to achieve maximal yield of L-xylulose production (Figure 4A). Beyond this optimal concentration, the yield showed a decreasing trend. This was expected, owing to the issues in diffusion associated with the excessive rigidity of the calcium alginate beads. Similarly, the optimal CaCl2 concentration was found to be 0.3 M (Figure 4B). Combined with the data shown in Figure 3, the optimal sodium alginate concentration (2%) and CaCl2 concentration (0.3 M) that allowed the formation of beads with suitable rigidity and permeability was established, enabling minimal cell leakage and maximal L-xylulose production yield.
It should be noted that, another factor that affects the overall catalytic efficiency of the immobilized biocatalyst is the weight of the cell culture encapsulated. The catalytic efficiency increases with increasing cell inoculum up to an optimal inoculum weight, beyond which it shows a decreasing trend37. A possible explanation for this decrease is cellular overcrowding, which hinders molecular diffusion throughout the calcium alginate beads and decreases the catalytic efficiency of the system. Using the optimized immobilization condition above, the highest L-xylulose production was obtained with a cell loading of 3.75 (gDCW)/L16 (data not shown).
Reusability of the Immobilized and Free Whole-cell Biocatalysts for L-xylulose Production. 
Using the established optimized condition of 1:1 E. coliSpNox&#160;to&#160;E. coliHjLAD ratio, 2% (w/v) sodium alginate, and 0.3 M CaCl2, the immobilized coupled whole-cell biocatalyst output a maximal L-xylulose yield of 64%, compared to a much higher yield of 96% for the free coupled whole-cell system (cycle 1 of Figure 5). Note that the yield of immobilized E. coliHjLAD cell alone was only 32.5% (data not shown), lower than that of the immobilized coupled system as well as the free single biocatalyst system (79%, Figure 1C). This reduction was expected as immobilization is known to decrease the activity of biocatalysts, possibly due to substrate diffusion limitations, but was compensated by the advantage of improved reusability of a biocatalyst upon immobilization. This effect on the stability of the biocatalyst is demonstrated by the decreasing trend in L-xylulose yield observed on subjecting the free and immobilized systems repeatedly to a batch reaction process, shown in Figure 5. The yield for the free system showed a much steeper decline than that of the immobilized system, indicating a more rapid loss of enzyme activity in the free system. As a result, both systems had a comparable L-xylulose yield for production cycle 2. At the end of 7 cycles of successive re-use, the encapsulated biocatalysts maintained their stability and retained 65% of the original yield while the free whole-cell system retained less than 10% of its ability to produce L-xylulose. This demonstrates that the immobilized biocatalysts could be reused effectively for the production of L-xylulose and that the benefit of improved reusability and stability brought on by immobilization far outweighs the reduction in activity of the biocatalyst, conferring a significant advantage to the production process over a free whole-cell system.
<img alt="Figure 1" src="/files/ftp_upload/53944/53944fig1.jpg" /> 
Figure 1.&#160;Coupled Whole-cell System for the Biocatalytic Production of L-xylulose. (A) Schematic illustrating the cofactor regeneration reaction occurring in a coupled whole-cell system comprising E. coli cells harboring HjLAD or SpNox, respectively. (B) Variation in the yield of L-xylulose with different E. coliSpNox&#160;to&#160;E. coliHjLAD&#160;ratios. (C) L-xylulose yield from a whole-cell biocatalyst comprised of only E. coliHjLAD compared to that of a coupled whole-cell system comprised of E. coliHjLAD and E. coliSpNox cells capable of cofactor regeneration. The plots shown represent average and standard deviation of three independent experiments. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/53944/53944fig1large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 2" src="/files/ftp_upload/53944/53944fig2.jpg" /> 
Figure 2.&#160;Immobilization of the Whole-cell Biocatalysts via Encapsulation in Alginate Beads. Schematic representing the formation of uniformly sized Ca2+ alginate beads by dropwise addition of the sodium alginate-cell suspension to a solution of calcium chloride. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/53944/53944fig2large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 3" src="/files/ftp_upload/53944/53944fig3.jpg" /> 
Figure 3.&#160;Parameters Influencing the Efficiency of Immobilization of the Whole-cell Biocatalyst in Alginate Beads. Immobilization efficiency as a function of (A) sodium alginate (%w/v) (B) CaCl2 (M) concentration. The plots shown represent the average and standard deviation of three independent experiments. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/53944/53944fig3large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 4" src="/files/ftp_upload/53944/53944fig4.jpg" /> 
Figure 4.&#160;Evaluation of the Yield of L-xylulose from the Immobilized Coupled Whole-cell Biocatalyst as a function of (A) sodium alginate (% w/v) (B) CaCl2 (M) concentration. The plots shown represent the average and standard deviation of three independent experiments. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/53944/53944fig4large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 5" src="/files/ftp_upload/53944/53944fig5.jpg" /> 
Figure 5.&#160;Assessment of the Biocatalyst Reusability. The yield of L-xylulose production for 7 successive cycles of reuse of immobilized and free coupled whole-cell biocatalyst is shown in dark and light gray, respectively. The plot shown represents the average and standard deviation of three independent experiments. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/53944/53944fig5large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>

Presented is the protocol for co-immobilizing whole-cell biocatalysts for cofactor regeneration and improved reusability, using the production of L-xylulose as an example. The cofactor regeneration is achieved by coupling two Escherichia coli strains expressing functionally complementary enzymes; the whole-cell biocatalyst immobilization is achieved by cell encapsulation in calcium alginate beads.

Immobilization of Multi-biocatalysts in Alginate Beads for Cofactor Regeneration and Improved Reusability

We have recently developed a simple, reusable and coupled whole-cell biocatalytic system with the capability of cofactor regeneration and biocatalyst ...

Research

JoVE Journal

Chemistry

Microfluidic On-chip Capture-cycloaddition Reaction to Reversibly Immobilize Small Molecules or Multi-component Structures for Biosensor Applications

Methods  for rapid surface immobilization of bioactive small molecules with control over  orientation and immobilization density are highly desirable for ...

Covalent Binding of BMP-2 on Surfaces Using a Self-assembled Monolayer Approach

Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) is a growth factor embedded in the extracellular matrix of bone tissue. BMP-2 acts as trigger of mesenchymal cell ...

Stabilizing Hepatocellular Phenotype Using Optimized Synthetic Surfaces

Currently, one of the major limitations in cell biology is maintaining differentiated cell phenotype. Biological matrices are commonly used for culturing ...

Light-driven Enzymatic Decarboxylation

Oxidoreductases belong to the most-applied industrial enzymes. Nevertheless, they need external electrons whose supply is often costly and challenging. ...

Microbubble Fabrication of Concave-porosity PDMS Beads

Microbubble fabrication (by use of a fine emulsion) provides a means of increasing the surface-area-to-volume (SAV) ratio of polymer materials, which is ...

Preparation of Biopolymer Aerogels Using Green Solvents

Although the first reports on aerogels made by Kistler1 in the 1930s dealt with aerogels from both inorganic oxides (silica and others) and biopolymers ...

Peptide and Protein Quantification Using Automated Immuno-MALDI (iMALDI)

Mass spectrometry (MS) is one of the most commonly used technologies for quantifying proteins in complex samples, with excellent assay specificity as a ...

Phthalic Acid Ester-Binding DNA Aptamer Selection, Characterization, and Application to an Electrochemical Aptasensor

Phthalic acid esters (PAEs) areone of the major groups of persistent organic pollutants. The group-specific detection of PAEs is highly desired due to the ...

Enzymatic Cascade Reactions for the Synthesis of Chiral Amino Alcohols from L-lysine

Amino alcohols are versatile compounds with a wide range of applications. For instance, they have been used as chiral scaffolds in organic synthesis. ...

Preparation of Functional Silica Using a Bioinspired Method

The goal of the protocols described herein is to synthesize bioinspired silica materials, perform enzyme encapsulation therein, and partially or totally ...