A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This study presents a simplified protocol for tissue processing involving decapitation, fixation, cryosectioning, fluorescence staining, immunostaining, and imaging, which can be extended to confocal and multiphoton imaging. The method maintains efficacy comparable to complex dissections, bypassing the need for advanced motor skills. Quantitative image analysis provides extensive investigative potential.

Abstract

Immunostaining Drosophila melanogaster brains is essential for exploring the mechanisms behind complex behaviors, neural circuits, and protein expression patterns. Traditional methods often involve challenges such as performing complex dissection, maintaining tissue integrity, and visualizing specific expression patterns during high-resolution imaging. We present an optimized protocol that combines cryosectioning with fluorescence staining and immunostaining. This method improves tissue preservation and signal clarity and reduces the need for laborious dissection for Drosophila brain imaging. The method entails rapid dissection, optimal fixation, cryoprotection, and cryosectioning, followed by fluorescent staining and immunostaining. The protocol significantly reduces tissue damage, enhances antibody penetration, and yields sharp, well-defined images. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach by visualizing specific neural populations and synaptic proteins with high fidelity. This versatile method allows for the analysis of various protein markers in the adult brain across multiple z-planes and can be adapted for other tissues and model organisms. The protocol provides a reliable and efficient tool for researchers conducting high-quality immunohistochemistry in Drosophila neurobiology studies. This method's detailed visualization facilitates comprehensive analysis of neuroanatomy, pathology, and protein localization, making it particularly valuable for neuroscience research.

Introduction

Complex behaviors ranging from social interactions1, sensory perception and processing2, learning3, to movement4 are driven by the brain. Neurological disorders are also increasingly common and predicted to increase with time5,6. It is critical to study how the brain works in both health and disease. The central dogma of molecular biology suggests that one of the most important functions of biological units is proteins7, and both how much and where they are expressed are critical to understanding how the brain works.

Drosophila melanogaster, commonly known as the fruit fly, is a highly valuable model for studying brain function under aging and pathophysiological conditions8. The availability of advanced genetic tools in Drosophila enables researchers to explore the function of nearly any protein9, with comprehensive genetic libraries for almost every gene readily accessible10. Coupled with its short lifespan and high reproductive rate, these features make Drosophila an exceptional model for brain research11. This has led to significant achievements, including developing a complete brain map of the fly12, and even contributed to a Nobel Prize for elucidating the neuronal mechanisms of circadian rhythms and molecular clocks13,14,15. As a result, Drosophila remains a powerful and versatile system, driving forward our understanding of brain function and providing unprecedented insights into neurological processes.

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence are foundational tools to study protein expression in situ. In contrast to techniques like Western Blot, which only allows for semiquantitative analysis and is typically conducted in bulk tissue16, or complicated and expensive techniques like mass spectrometry to measure protein level17, immunohistochemistry is relatively straightforward and allows for both the quantification of protein expression and for measuring the localization of a protein within a tissue or cell. Importantly, fluorescent immunohistochemistry can also be multiplexed to measure multiple proteins to identify specific cell types and tissues or answer multiple questions in the same tissue. Additionally, tissue fixation can allow comparisons across different experimental conditions, genotypes, ages, and circadian time points. However, fluorescent immunohistochemistry can be challenging, and many factors can influence image quality. This optimized cryosectioning and immunostaining protocol for Drosophila brains aims to enhance high-resolution imaging by improving tissue preservation, antibody penetration, and visualization of neural populations and protein markers. Developed to address challenges in traditional methods, such as complex dissection, tissue damage, and limited imaging resolution associated with whole-brain mounts18. This protocol combines cryosectioning with fluorescence staining to ensure structural integrity and sharp imaging across multiple z-planes. Compared to whole-mount preparations, this method minimizes distortion, facilitates deeper antibody diffusion, and provides clear neuroanatomical and protein localization analyses18. Its versatility allows adaptation for other tissues and model organisms, offering a reliable and efficient tool for neuroscience research19,20. It can be adapted to look at almost any protein and applied to study any condition, disease, or model.

Protocol

1. Preparation of equipment

  1. Ensure that the cryostat is powered on and set to -20 Β°C. Power on the slide warmer or a small incubator, ensuring it is set to 37 Β°C.
    NOTE: At this stage, labeled slides can be placed on the warmer or incubator and left indefinitely until sectioning.

2. Preparation of solutions

  1. Prepare 50 mL of 1x Phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, from 10x PBS stock. Prepare a solution of 4% Paraformaldehyde in PBS with a final volume of 10 mL.
  2. Prepare a cleaning solution of 70% ethanol in water in a spray bottle. Prepare a blocking solution (3% Bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline from 20x stock). Prepare a primary antibody solution (dilution is experiment-dependent). Here, a 1:250 dilution of ApoE Mouse Antibody in 3% BSA in TBS is used.
  3. Prepare a secondary antibody solution (dilution is experiment-dependent). Here, a 1:500 dilution of Alexa Flour 750 A21037 Goat Anti-Mouse Secondary in 3% BSA in TBS is used.
  4. Prepare fluorescent stain solution (dilution is experiment-dependent). Here, a 5 Β΅g/mL solution of Nile Red in PBS is prepared.
    NOTE: All solutions, particularly fluorescents, should be refrigerated and stored in a dark refrigerated container. They should also be brought to room temperature just prior to use.

3. Collection of tissue

  1. After obtaining flies in aging vials, open the valve on the CO2 mat and dump the flies onto the mat quickly to avoid escape. Wait for the flies to become mostly unconscious, ceasing most movement. Position flies underneath the SZ61 microscope by moving the mat underneath the objective lens. Adjust magnification and focus such that the flies are clearly visible and comfortable to decapitate.
    NOTE: The flies used for this example are ELAV/+ and ELAV>ApoE4
  2. Insert spring scissors between the thorax and head, squeeze firmly, and decapitate 5 to 10 fly heads per experimental group. Return unused flies to their aging vial.
    NOTE: If concern regarding penetration of fixative exists, a small incision can be performed on the posterior of the head to allow for increased penetration of the fixative agent in step 4.1.
  3. Using a brush, gently place heads into labeled 1.5 mL tubes on ice until ELAV/+ and ELAV>ApoE4 groups have been collected.

4. Fixation of whole tissue

  1. Remove the tubes from ice and pipette 100 Β΅L of 4% Paraformaldehyde in PBS solution into each tube, ensuring that all heads are submerged in the solution. If heads are adhering to the walls of the tube and avoiding contact with the solution, use a brush to gently push them downward or tap lightly against a horizontal surface to ensure appropriate contact.
  2. Place on an orbital shaker using a medium setting for 15 min. After 15 min, discard the Paraformaldehyde solution and replace it with 1x PBS for 10 min, ensuring that all heads are submerged in the solution.
  3. Discarding the previous solution each time, wash the tissue with PBS 2x for 10 min each, for a total of 3 washes.
  4. After the final wash, transfer the heads to a 10% sucrose in PBS solution, ensuring the heads are submerged within the tube. Leave these overnight for optimal saturation.
    NOTE: If same-day imaging is desired, the sucrose infusion can be reduced; however, cryoprotectant effects will also be reduced proportionally.

5. Mold preparation

  1. Fill a labeled mold approximately 50% with Optimal Cutting Temperature (OCT) compound, allowing it to spread to all 4 corners of the mold.
  2. Using a brush, carefully place the heads on the surface of the OCT within the mold. When placing multiple experimental groups into the same mold, ensure that these groups are separated within the mold to prevent confusion.
    NOTE: It is important to prevent dilution of the OCT compound through contamination with the prior sucrose solution via the brush. In addition, placement deep into the OCT using the brush can create many bubbles around the heads. Avoid these mistakes to prevent sectioning issues later on.
  3. Using the tip of the forceps, slowly push each head to the bottom of the mold with eyes facing the bottom. This orientation is selected for a cut through the coronal plane.
  4. Avoid puncturing or crushing the heads against the bottom of the mold during this process. Align all heads in the X, Y, and Z dimensions so that each section contains all subjects simultaneously. Ensure slow submersion to reduce air bubble formation.
  5. Once all heads are aligned properly, carefully place molds directly into -20 Β°C to freeze.
    NOTE: If the alignment of heads is noted to be significantly off during sectioning, consider the use of dry ice or liquid nitrogen for initial snap freezing of the mold.
  6. Once the mold has mostly frozen, fill the remainder with OCT and allow it to freeze before storing for the long term at - 80 Β°C.

6. Cryosectioning of molds

NOTE: It is generally advisable to prepare and cut a blank mold before cutting experimental group molds. This allows to ensure the proper functionality of the wheel, blade, and anti-roll glass immediately before sectioning tissue.

  1. Attach the chuck bit to the mold by applying a generous amount of OCT to the mold and placing the bit on top, pressing it flat. Allow this to freeze completely in the cryostat, usually within 5 min.
  2. Release the bit and OCT block from the mold and place it into the chuck, ensuring the mold remains properly oriented from top to bottom. Tighten the chuck key until the bit is secure.
  3. Align the block with the blade using the adjustment knobs and chuck depth controls.
  4. Set the section width to 20 Β΅m. Cut each slice using slow but consistent motion, allowing the anti-roll glass to capture each slice. Capture sections using the warmed slides by touching the slide to the closer edge of the section and allowing the section to rise up onto the slide. Up to eight sections can be fit on a standard-size slide (25 mm x 75 mm x 1mm) when spaced appropriately.
    NOTE: There is a matter of choice to be made when choosing which sections to collect. As a result of the embedding orientation, earlier sections will be from the anterior, and later sections will be from the posterior portions of the head. As such, if interest lies in one particular area more than another, section selection can be adjusted accordingly. Alternatively, all sections can be collected on multiple slides until no tissue remains.
  5. Allow slides to dry at room temperature for at least 30 min but no more than 1 h.

7. Staining and IHC

NOTE: For this protocol, the method will detail IHC using an unconjugated primary antibody. Fluorochrome conjugated antibodies, or other fluorescence stains that can be performed in a single stage, should be used together with the secondary antibody if both are to be used together.

  1. Immediately following the drying period, remove OCT on the edges of the slide using a razor blade, leaving room for a hydrophobic border. Draw a hydrophobic border on each slide using the Β marker. Allow this to dry for 5 min.
  2. Wash all slides 3 times for 5 min each with PBS by pipetting gently on top of the slide, avoiding pipetting directly on top of tissue when possible.
    NOTE: The 1000 Β΅L pipette is most useful here. A standard-size slide with tissue should be completely covered with 750Β΅L of any solution. Slide racks and buckets may also be used.
  3. After the slides have been washed, pipette 3% BSA in TBS blocking solution onto the slides. Allow to incubate for 30 minutes.
  4. Discard the blocking solution and pipette theΒ primary antibody solution onto the slides. In this case, a 1:250 dilution of SC-13521 ApoE in 3% BSA in TBS. Allow the antibody to incubate overnight at 4 Β°C or for 1 h at room temperature. Use wet tissue wipes or paper towels to prevent the solution from drying out overnight.
  5. Discard the primary antibody and using the pipette, wash 3 times for 5 minutes each with PBS.
  6. Add the secondary antibody solution. In this case, a 1:500 dilution of AF 750 Goat Anti-Mouse in addition to a 5 Β΅g/mL concentration of Nile Red, all in 3% BSA in TBS. Allow this to incubate for 1 hour at room temperature.
    NOTE: We simultaneously incubate a fluorescent stain and a secondary antibody in the same buffer, 3% BSA in TBS. This is preferred as long as there are no known conflicts between the two reagents. If conflicts exist, incubate separately and perform an additional 3 washes between incubations.
  7. Wash slides 3 times with PBS for 5 min each. After the final wash, leaveΒ  a small amount of PBS on the slide.

8. Mounting and preparation for imaging

  1. Using a 1000 Β΅L pipette, add 3-5 drops of hardening mounting media containing DAPI (0.9Β΅g/ml), evenly across the slide avoiding direct dropping on tissue.
  2. Place the coverslip on the slide, avoiding any air bubble formation.
    NOTE: The use of forceps can aid in this by allowing the coverslip to slide close to the surface of the slide before finally releasing.
  3. Handle freshly mounted slides with care and store them flat until completely dry. Seal slides using nail polish if long-term storage is anticipated.
  4. Capture images as soon as possible to avoid fluorescent decay.

9. Image acquisition

NOTE: For image capture, the use of Olympus Cell Sense Dimensions software will be detailed.

  1. Before imaging, inspect slides and wipe them using 70% ethanol in water solution. If slides are imaged immediately following mounting, take extra care when cleaning to avoid disturbing the coverslip. Allow the surfaces of the slide and coverslip to dry for 5 min before imaging.
  2. Select each desired channel for capture, in this case, the channels for DAPI, Nile Red, and AF 750.
    1. Select the desired magnification as described below. The choice of magnification is experiment-dependent; here, use 10x magnification.
      NOTE: All magnifications are usable, including oil-based lenses. If desired, apply immersion oil to the slide surface.
    2. For each channel, calibrate proper exposure times based on the brightest fluorescing subjects in an experiment. Avoid overexposure while generating as bright an image as possible.
      NOTE: In general, the two main determinants of poor process capture are overexposure, resulting in the loss of definition, and too much background signal, which is difficult to separate from the true signal. In addition, exposures must be set independently for each unique magnification used.
    3. Select the folder to save and name the merged images within the menu. Following capture, all images will be located in this folder and bear the name defined here.
    4. Capture images by first focusing on a subject in the channel that allows for the best focal point and then begin collection. Maintain the procedure of focusing on each subject in the same channel for consistency across the experiment.
    5. Capture all experimental groups used for later comparisons on the same day to avoid fluorescent decay between compared groups.

10. Quantification

NOTE: Quantification can be performed using a variety of softwares. Here, the use of Olympus CellSense Dimensions is referenced.

  1. Following the collection, review the images. Remove sections that possess imperfectionsΒ or sectioning artifactsΒ from the quantification folder. Select images that reflect the goal of quantification. Examples of imperfections are bubbles, torn sections, overlapping tissue, and dust or debris.
    1. To select appropriate images, ensure that all images featuring brain tissue are used for quantification to reflect overall expression throughout the brain. Alternatively, use images only reflecting the fore, mid, or hind brain to give insight into differences in expression in these areas.
  2. Within the count and measure menus, determine the parameters of interest and their boundaries for the quantification of images.
    1. For quantification of ApoE expression by mean intensity value comparison, select thresholding values such that all pixels for that channel are considered (0-infinity). In addition, outline regions of interest using available drawing tools.
  3. Run the count and measure either in a batch for all files or individually on each image.
    1. For batch processing, record the settings and execution of quantification and then select the folder to perform quantification. Processing in a batch is accessible through the macro manager tab and greatly accelerates workflow.
  4. Export the data table to a spreadsheet for plotting. To do this, use the count and measure results menu while opening or exporting to a table automatically when performing in a batch. These data tables will contain all selected parameters chosen in step 10.2.
  5. For statistical analysis and plotting, plot data using a spreadsheet directly, or through other software. Familiarity with the chosen software is key to generating an accurate representation of the experimental outcomes. Here, absolute intensity values of ApoE expression in the brain of the mutant were normalized to the control and then plotted using GraphPad Prism.

Results

The method described above allows for fluorescence imaging of adult fly brains reliably and without tedious dissection. Illustrated simply in Figure 1, the method is straightforward and can be performed rapidly if all specimens, equipment, and materials are readily available. Alternatively, using -80 Β°C storage during the OCT mold stage, specimens can be kept for use many weeks later. Researchers need not be trained long to learn the simple dissection an...

Discussion

Here, we present a protocol for precise fluorescent imaging of cryosectioned Drosophila heads. This is a straightforward approach that has several important positives. Namely, the methods are simple enough that anyone with basic laboratory safety training could complete, they are adaptable to measure the expression of any protein that high-quality antibodies exist for, and they allow for precise measurement of both how much a protein of interest is expressed and where that expression occurs throughout the head. ...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Melkani lab for their help with valuable feedback for developing the protocol. Fly stocks, Elav-Gal4 (BL#458) and UAS-ApoE4 (BL#76607) were obtained from BloomingtonΒ DrosophilaΒ Stock Center (Bloomington, IN, USA). This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants AG065992 and RF1NS133378 to G.C.M. This work is also supported by UAB Startup funds 3123226 and 3123227 to G.C.M.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
1000 uL PipetteEppendorf3123000063
1000 uL Pipette TipsOlympus Plastics23-165R
10X Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS)FisherJ62036.K7ph=7.4
200 Proof EthanolDecon Laboratories64-17-5
20X Tris Buffered SalineThermo ScientificJ60877.K2pH=7.4
AF750 Goat Anti-Mouse Secondary AntibodyAlexa FluorA21037
Anti-Roll GlassIMEBAR-14047742497
ApoE Mouse Primary AntibodySanta CruzSC13521
Bovine Serum AlbuminFisher9048-46-8
Centrifuge Tubes 1.5 mLFisher05-408-129
Charged SlidesGlobe Scientific1415-15
Cryosectioning MoldsFisher2363553
CryostatLeicaCM 3050 S
Cryostat BladesC.L. SturkeyDT554N50
Distilled Water
Dry Ice??????
Fine ForcepsFine Science Tools11254-20
Fly PadTritech ResearchMINJ-DROS-FP
Hardening mounting Media with DapiVectashieldH-1800
KimwipesKimtech34120
MicroscopeOlympusSZ61
Nile RedΒ SigmaN3013
Optimal Cutting Temperature CompoundFisher4585
Orbital ShakerOHAUSSHLD0415DG
Paraformaldehyde 20%Electron Microscopy Sciences15713
Razor BladesGravey#40475
Spring ScissorsFine Science Tools15000-10
SucroseFisherS5-500

References

  1. Fabbri-Destro, M., Rizzolatti, G. Mirror neurons and mirror systems in monkeys and humans. Physiology. 23, 171-179 (2008).
  2. Faust, T. E., Gunner, G., Schafer, D. P. Mechanisms governing activity-dependent synaptic pruning in the developing mammalian CNS. Nat Rev Neurosci. 22, 657-673 (2021).
  3. Roozendaal, B., McEwen, B. S., Chattarji, S. Stress, memory and the amygdala. Nat Rev Neurosci. 10, 423-433 (2009).
  4. Arber, S., Costa, R. M. Networking brainstem and basal ganglia circuits for movement. Nat Rev Neurosci. 23, 342-360 (2022).
  5. GBD 2019 Dementia Forecasting Collaborators. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 7, e105-e125 (2022).
  6. Huang, Y., Li, Y., Pan, H., Han, L. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders in 204 countries and territories worldwide. J Glob Health. 13, 04160 (2023).
  7. Crick, F. Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature. 227, 561-563 (1970).
  8. Ugur, B., Chen, K., Bellen, H. J. Drosophila tools and assays for the study of human diseases. Dis Model Mech. 9, 235-244 (2016).
  9. Hales, K. G., Korey, C. A., Larracuente, A. M., Roberts, D. M. Genetics on the Fly: A primer on the Drosophila model system. Genetics. 201, 815-842 (2015).
  10. Larkin, A., et al. FlyBase: updates to the Drosophila melanogaster knowledge base. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D899-D907 (2021).
  11. Jeibmann, A., Paulus, W. Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism of brain diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 10, 407-440 (2009).
  12. Winding, M., et al. The connectome of an insect brain. Science. 379, eadd9330 (2023).
  13. Bargiello, T. A., Jackson, F. R., Young, M. W. Restoration of circadian behavioural rhythms by gene transfer in Drosophila. Nature. 312, 752-754 (1984).
  14. Zehring, W. A., et al. P-element transformation with period locus DNA restores rhythmicity to mutant, arrhythmic Drosophila melanogaster. Cell. 39, 369-376 (1984).
  15. Huang, R. C. The discoveries of molecular mechanisms for the circadian rhythm: The 2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Biomed J. 41, 5-8 (2018).
  16. Mahmood, T., Yang, P. C. Western blot: technique, theory, and trouble shooting. N Am J Med Sci. 4, 429-434 (2012).
  17. Ong, S. E., Foster, L. J., Mann, M. Mass spectrometric-based approaches in quantitative proteomics. Methods. 29, 124-130 (2003).
  18. Behnke, J. A., Ye, C., Moberg, K. H., Zheng, J. Q. A protocol to detect neurodegeneration in Drosophila melanogaster whole-brain mounts using advanced microscopy. STAR Protoc. 2, 100689 (2021).
  19. Moraes, R. C. M., et al. Apolipoprotein E induces lipid accumulation through Dgat2 that is prevented with time-restricted feeding in Drosophila. Genes. 15 (11), 1376 (2024).
  20. Roth, J. R., et al. Rapamycin reduces neuronal mutant huntingtin aggregation and ameliorates locomotor performance in Drosophila. Front Aging Neurosci. 15, 1223911 (2023).
  21. Currier, T. A., Pang, M. M., Clandinin, T. R. Visual processing in the fly, from photoreceptors to behavior. Genetics. 224, (2023).
  22. McKellar, C. E., Siwanowicz, I., Dickson, B. J., Simpson, J. H. Controlling motor neurons of every muscle for fly proboscis reaching. Elife. 9, (2020).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

DrosophilaCryosectioningFluorescence StainingImmunostainingBrain ImagingTissue PreservationNeural CircuitsProtein ExpressionProtocol OptimizationAntibody PenetrationImmunohistochemistryNeurobiology StudiesNeuroanatomy AnalysisSynaptic Proteins

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright Β© 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved