A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Here, we outline a comprehensive protocol for generating and utilizing laboratory-engineered glioblastoma organoids (LEGO) to investigate genotype-phenotype dependencies and screen potential drugs for glioblastoma treatment.

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is described as a group of highly malignant primary brain tumors and stands as one of the most lethal malignancies. The genetic and cellular characteristics of GBM have been a focal point of ongoing research, revealing that it is a group of heterogeneous diseases with variations in RNA expression, DNA methylation, or cellular composition. Despite the wealth of molecular data available, the lack of transferable pre-clinic models has limited the application of this information to disease classification rather than treatment stratification. Transferring the patients' genetic information into clinical benefits and bridging the gap between detailed descriptions of GBM, genotype-phenotype associations, and treatment advancements remain significant challenges. In this context, we present an advanced human GBM organoid model, the Laboratory Engineered Glioblastoma Organoid (LEGO), and illustrate its use in studying the genotype-phenotype dependencies and screening potential drugs for GBM. Utilizing this model, we have identified lipid metabolism dysregulation as a critical milestone in GBM progression and discovered that the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor Lomitapide shows promise as a potential treatment for GBM.

Introduction

Glioblastoma (GBM) accounts for more than 60% of all diagnosed primary brain tumors in adults, with a median survival of less than two years1,2,3. Despite considerable efforts in deciphering the underlying complexity of this disease, continuous attempts with targeted therapies or immunotherapies, and screening for potential anti-cancer drugs, the treatment strategy for newly diagnosed GBM patients remains to be the maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiotherapy (RT) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) and then adjuvant TMZ4.

The highly heterogeneous mutational nature of glioblastoma within and among tumors makes it extremely difficult to dissect the molecular properties of this tumor, which eventually leads to treatment failure. Thus, it is essential to decomplexify the disease by reducing the variety of genetic mutations to the modules of mutations that occur most often in GBM patients5,6,7,8 and to investigate the molecular consequences of each mutational subclone individually.

Recently, organoids have emerged as a promising model for cancer research. Organoids surpass the canonical cancer models since they exhibit a human microenvironment and complex cellular components while being easy to generate and expand with a relatively low cost9. There were also pioneers of genetically engineered organoids with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) to study glioma10,11. Following this direction, we generated a set of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based human GBM organoid models (LEGO: Laboratory Engineered Glioblastoma Organoid) based on CRISPR/Cas9 genetic engineering of the frequent mutations identified in GBM patients. With detailed characterization of the single-cell transcriptome, DNA methylome, metabolome, lipidome, proteome, and phospho-proteome of LEGOs, we have demonstrated the high resemblance of LEGOs with human GBM and discovered major milestones during the progression of GBM, and with luciferase-based drug screen, we have identified several potential drugs for GBM treatment, the details of such results have been published previously12. This article describes the detailed protocol for the generation and drug screening of LEGOs (Figure 1A).

Protocol

1. Luciferase labeling of the iPSCs

NOTE: For detailed instructions on culturing iPSCs, refer to the protocol provided by the institutions or the companies from which the cells were obtained. In all experiments described in this protocol, the iPSCs at passages 3-10 post-recovery were used, and any cells showing signs of differentiation were discarded. For the virus production, plasmids containing an EF1α promoter driving Luc2, along with a puromycin-resistant cassette, were used.

  1. When the cells reach ~70% confluency, digest iPSCs with passaging reagents A and B (see Table of Materials), respectively, for 4 min at 37 °C, centrifuge at 120 x g for 5 min, and resuspend into a single cell suspension by gentle pipetting.
  2. Count the cells and seed 1 x 104 single cells of iPSC in each well of a basement matrix membrane (BMM)-coated 48 well plate, culture for 24 h with human embryonic cell qualified culture medium containing 10 µM rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitor (see Table of Materials).
  3. Infect the cells with lentivirus-containing luciferase-expressing plasmids (MOI around 10) and 8 µg/mL Polybrene (see Table of Materials). Replace the medium with a fresh human embryonic cell-qualified culture medium 6 h later.
  4. After 24 h, add 150 µg/mL Luciferase Substrate (see Table of Materials) to the cell culture medium and check the bioluminescence (BLI) signal with bioluminescence imaging equipment (see Table of Materials) with a 5 s exposure.
  5. Add 2 µg/mL puromycin to the culture medium for 2 days, then change the medium every other day for 1 week to expand the cells.
  6. When the cells reach ~70% confluency, digest iPSCs with passaging reagents A and B (see Table of Materials), respectively, for 4 min at 37 °C, centrifuge at 120 x g for 5 min, and resuspend into a single cell suspension by gentle pipetting.
  7. Count the cells and seed the single cells at a concentration of 50 cells per 10 cm dish for 2 dishes. Change the medium every other day until the clones reach 3-5 mm in diameter (Figure 1B).
  8. Check the BLI signal as described above and pick the clones with strong BLI signals under the microscope with sterilized 10 µL pipette tips.
  9. Expand the cells for further usage.

2. gRNA design and plasmid cloning

NOTE: These steps can be carried out simultaneously with Section 1. CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids with a proper selection system should work. These specific plasmids were used because they enable simultaneous knockout of several target genes. This section demonstrates how to clone a plasmid with two gRNA scaffolds; more gRNA scaffolds can be cloned in one plasmid following the same principle. The original protocol was previously published13.

  1. Design gRNAs targeting the respective genes of interest with online web tools (see Table of Materials). Select the gRNAs targeting the exons presented in all splicing variants and locate the closest to the transcription starting site.
  2. Anneal gRNA oligos (95 °C for 5 min, cool down to 25 °C at a speed of 1 °C/s) and linearize pX330A-1x2 (see Table of Materials) and pX330S-2 (see Table of Materials) plasmids with Bbs1 enzyme.
  3. Ligate one of the gRNAs with pX330A-1x2 or pX330S-2, respectively, with T4 ligase at room temperature (RT) for 4 h.
  4. Digest the two resulting plasmids with BsaI enzyme (37 °C for 1 h) and purify the products by gel extraction.
  5. Ligate the gRNA scaffolds from the pX330S-2-gRNA plasmid to the linearized pX330A-1x2-gRNA plasmid with T4 ligase at RT for 4 h.
  6. Clone puromycin resistance gene (PuroR) from the pX459 (see Table of Materials) plasmid to the resulting plasmids by EcoRI digestion (37 °C for 1 h) and subsequential T4 ligation at RT for 4 h.
  7. Transform the plasmids in DH5alpha-competent cells and extract the plasmids after expanding.

3. Knockout generation and validation on iPSCs

NOTE: Follow the standard CRISPR/Cas9 knockout protocols published before13,14. This section describes the method used to perform the knockouts via electroporation.

  1. Digest the iPSCs with passaging reagents A and B (see Table of Materials) for 4 min at 37 °C each, and spin down the cells for 5 min at 120 x g and resuspend in human embryonic cell qualified culture medium (see Table of Materials) to generate single-cell suspensions.
  2. Count the cells and divide them into several tubes to achieve 1.2 x 106 cells per sample and spin down the cells at 120 x g for 5 min.
  3. Meanwhile, mix 15 µg of the plasmids in 135 µL of resuspension buffer from the transfection kit (see Table of Materials).
  4. Use 120 µL of the mixture to resuspend the cell pellet.
  5. Electroporate the cells for two pulses at 1200 V for 20 ms with an electroporation system (see Table of Materials) and plate the resulting cells in one 6 well plate well with a human embryonic cell qualified culture medium containing reagent to facilitate single-cell survival (see Table of Materials).
  6. Add 2 µg/mL puromycin to the culture medium every 12 h for 2 days. Then, expand the cells for 1 week before harvest.
  7. Check the efficiency of the knockout by western blotting or webtool analysis (see Table of Materials) and select the knockout population with the highest efficiency.
  8. Digest the iPSCs with the highest knockout efficiency with passaging reagents A and B for 4 min at 37 °C each, and spin down the cells for 5 min at 120 x g. Resuspend in human embryonic cell qualified culture medium to generate single-cell suspensions.
  9. Count the cells and seed approximately 100 cells in two 10 cm dishes (50 cells in each dish) containing pre-warmed human embryonic cell qualified culture medium supplied with a reagent to facilitate single-cell survival.
  10. Change the medium every other day and culture the cells for 2 weeks.
  11. When the single-cell colonies are 3-5 mm in diameter, pick the colonies with 10 µL pipette tips under the microscope and expand the cells in two wells of 48 well plates.
  12. When the cells reach 30%-50% confluency, extract the DNA from one well of the 48 well plate and perform PCR.
  13. Sequence the PCR products and analyze the results with the web tool (see Table of Materials).
  14. Select 5 positive clones to expand and further validate the knockout results with TA cloning and western blots.

4. Organoid Culture

NOTE: The organoids were generated following previously published protocols with minor adaptations15,16,17. The optimal age of the organoids (the culture duration) should be determined based on the specific purpose of the study. For instance, when investigating genotype-to-phenotype associations or observing organoid growth patterns, analyzing multiple time points ranging from 1-4 months or longer is recommended. Organoids aged 2-2.5 months were used for drug screening, as they tended to develop a necrotic core in the center due to nutrient limitations at larger sizes, which could impact the accuracy of drug screening results.

  1. On day 0, digest iPSCs with passaging reagents A and B (see Table of Materials) respectively for 4 min at 37 °C, centrifuge at 120 x g for 5 min, and resuspend into a single cell suspension using low basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) hES media (Table 1).
  2. Count the cells and add an appropriate number of cells to reach a concentration of 6 × 104 cells/mL.
  3. Add 50 µM ROCK inhibitor and 6 ng/mL bFGF to the low bFGF hES medium-containing cells.
  4. Seed 150 µL of cell suspension (9000 cells) into each well of the 96-well ultra-low attachment plate for both control (WT organoids) and experimental (knockout organoids) groups.
  5. On day 3, carefully remove 80 µL of old culture medium from each well and add 150 µL fresh low bFGF hES medium.
  6. On day 5, when embryonic bodies (EBs) begin to brighten and have smooth edges, remove as much old culture medium as possible from each well and add 150 µL to 200 µL of fresh neural induction medium (Table 1).
  7. On day 7, remove as much old culture medium as possible from each well and add 150-200 µL of neural induction medium.
  8. On day 9, observe the EBs under the tissue culture microscope and select the EBs that are brighter around the outside.
  9. Thaw BMM at 4 °C or on ice for 30 min before starting the following steps.
  10. Use a cut 200 µL wide pipette tip to transfer the EBs to the organoid embedding sheet (see Table of Materials), remove the excessive medium, drop 30 µL of BMM on the organoids, position the EBs in the middle of the droplet with a 10 µL pipette tip, and let it solidify in the 37 °C incubator for 20 min.
  11. Wash off the BMM droplets to a 6-well plate containing 3 mL of NeuroDMEM - A medium (Table 1) and 3 µM CHIR99021 (see Table of Materials).
  12. On day 11, remove as much of the old culture medium from each well and add 3 mL of fresh NeuroDMEM -A medium containing 3 µM CHIR99021.
  13. On day 13, remove as much of the old culture medium from each well as possible and add 3 mL of NeuroDMEM + A culture medium (Table 1). Place the 6-well plate on a shaker rotating at 75 rpm in the incubator.
  14. Refresh NeuroDMEM + A medium every 3 days until organoids are used.
  15. Use the organoids for multi-omic analysis following the standard protocols or drug screen as performed in the previous publication12.

5. Drug screen with LEGOs

NOTE: The exposure time for iPSCs or organoids BLI should be evaluated using various equipment or laboratory environments.

  1. Transfer organoids at the desired age to a 24-well plate containing 1 mL of NeuroDMEM + A medium, one organoid per well, 2 days before the experiment.
  2. Add 150 µg/mL D-luciferin and incubate on the shaker for 15-30 min.
  3. Perform BLI as described before with an exposure time of 1 s-5 s.
  4. Select the organoids with similar signal strengths for subsequent experiments (at least 3 organoids for each group).
  5. On day 0, repeat steps 5.2 and 5.3. Then apply dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or interested drugs to the culture medium of the organoids. Start with an initial drug concentration of 10 µM, then perform an IC50 assay or adjust the concentration further according to different purposes.
  6. Repeat step 5.5 every 2 days. Treat the organoids for 6-10 days.
    NOTE: The duration can be changed according to different purposes or the different nature of the drugs.
  7. Add 100 µM BrdU to the medium and incubate it in a CO2 incubator for 2 h before harvesting the organoids, if needed, for subsequent proliferation analysis.
  8. Normalize the BLI signal to the DMSO control measured on the same day and then compare it with before drug treatment to evaluate the drug treatment effect. Consider drugs with a P value less than 0.05 and a signal decrease of more than 50% effective.

Results

In our hands, LEGOs derived from mutant iPSCs displayed increased expansion compared to the WT isogenic control (Figure 1C) and showed atypical nuclear after 4 weeks of culture (Figure 1D), which supports the potential malignant transformation of the cells in mutant organoids18. The tumorigenic potential of the organoids can be further verified with xenografted experiments if required, as we have shown previously12...

Discussion

The lack of personalized treatment in human GBM could largely be attributed to the fact that many GBM models, such as human cell lines or mouse models, cannot faithfully recapitulate the human GBM. Consequently, the treatment strategies selected based on these model systems cannot be transferred into clinical applications. Instead, organoids can tackle these translational problems with the presence of human physiological conditions. To this end, we have generated LEGO and shown that LEGOS can faithfully recapitulate many...

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant SFB1389 (H-K.L.), Deutsche Krebshilfe grant 110227 (H-K.L.), European Research Council (ERC) grant 647055 (H-K.L.), Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK) grant AIM2GO (H-K.L.).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
AccutaseA6964Sigma-Aldrich Passaging reagent B
Antibiotic-Antimycotic15240096Life-Technologies
B27 17504044Life Technologies 
B27 without vitamin A 12587010Life Technologies 
Bbs1-HFR3539SNew England Biolabs
Bsa1-HFR3535SNew England Biolabs
CHIR990214423Tocris Bioscience
CloneR#05889STEMCELL Technologies Reagent to facilitate single-cell survival
D-LuciferinL2916InvitrogenLuciferase Substrate
DMEM/F-1211330032Life Technologies 
EcoRl-HFR3101TNew England Biolabs
Fetal Bovine Serum 30-2020ATCC 
FGF-2100-18BPeproTech 
GlutaMAX35050038Life Technologies 
HeparinH3149Sigma-Aldrich 
hES-quality Fetal Bovine Serum10270106Life Technologies 
Insulin SolutionI9278Sigma-Aldrich 
IVIS Lumina IINAPerkinElmer
Knockout serum replacement10828-028Life Technologies 
L-Ascorbic AcidA4544-25GSigma-Aldrich 
Matrigel® hES qualified354277CorningBasement matrix membrane
MEM-NEAA11140050Life Technologies 
mTeSR Plus100-0276STEMCELL Technologies Human embryonic cell qualified culture medium
N2 17502048Life Technologies 
Neon Electroporation SystemNAThermo Fisher ScientificElectroporation system
Neon Transfection System 100 µL KitMPK10096InvitrogenElectroporation kit
Neurobasal medium21103049Life Technologies 
Online knockout efficiency analysisNAhttp://shinyapps.datacurators.nl/tide/
Organoid Embedding Sheet # 08579STEMCELL Technologies 
Penicillin-Streptomycin 15140122Life-Technologies
Polybrene (10mg/mL)TR-1003-50ULMerck Millipore
PuromycinP8833Sigma-Aldrich
px330-A-1x2https://www.addgene.org/58766/Addgene 
px330-S-2 https://www.addgene.org/58778/Addgene 
px459https://www.addgene.org/48139/Addgene 
ReleSR5872STEMCELL Technologies Passaging reagent A
Rock Inhibitor72304STEMCELL Technologies 
sgRNA designNAhttps://zlab.bio/guide-design-resources
sgRNA designNANAwww.benchling.com
T4 DNA ligaseM0202SNew England Biolabs
β-Mercaptoethanol M3148Sigma-Aldrich 

References

  1. Stupp, R., et al. Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 318 (23), 2306-2316 (2017).
  2. Rock, K., et al. A clinical review of treatment outcomes in glioblastoma multiforme--the validation in a non-trial population of the results of a randomised phase iii clinical trial: Has a more radical approach improved survival. Br J Radiol. 85 (1017), e729-e733 (2012).
  3. Louis, D. N., et al. The 2016 world health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: A summary. Acta Neuropathol. 131 (6), 803-820 (2016).
  4. Wen, P. Y., et al. Glioblastoma in adults: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions. Neuro Oncol. 22 (8), 1073-1113 (2020).
  5. Ohgaki, H., Kleihues, P. Genetic pathways to primary and secondary glioblastoma. Am J Pathol. 170 (5), 1445-1453 (2007).
  6. Cancer Genome Atlas Research. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature. 455 (7216), 1061-1068 (2008).
  7. Brennan, C. W., et al. The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma. Cell. 155 (2), 462-477 (2013).
  8. Abou-El-Ardat, K., et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of multifocal glioblastoma proves its monoclonal origin and reveals novel insights into clonal evolution and heterogeneity of glioblastomas. Neuro Oncol. 19 (4), 546-557 (2017).
  9. Drost, J., Clevers, H. Organoids in cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer. 18 (7), 407-418 (2018).
  10. Ogawa, J., Pao, G. M., Shokhirev, M. N., Verma, I. M. Glioblastoma model using human cerebral organoids. Cell Rep. 23 (4), 1220-1229 (2018).
  11. Bian, S., et al. Genetically engineered cerebral organoids model brain tumor formation. Nat Methods. 15 (8), 631-639 (2018).
  12. Wang, C., et al. A multidimensional atlas of human glioblastoma-like organoids reveals highly coordinated molecular networks and effective drugs. NPJ Precis Oncol. 8 (1), 19 (2024).
  13. Sakuma, T., Nishikawa, A., Kume, S., Chayama, K., Yamamoto, T. Multiplex genome engineering in human cells using all-in-one CRISPR/CAS9 vector system. Sci Rep. 4 (1), 5400 (2015).
  14. Ran, F. A., et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-CAS9 system. Nat Protoc. 8 (11), 2281-2308 (2013).
  15. Lancaster, M. A., et al. Guided self-organization and cortical plate formation in human brain organoids. Nat Biotechnol. 35 (7), 659-666 (2017).
  16. Lancaster, M. A., Knoblich, J. A. Generation of cerebral organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Protoc. 9 (10), 2329-2340 (2014).
  17. Lancaster, M. A., et al. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature. 501 (7467), 373-379 (2013).
  18. Hanahan, D., Weinberg, R. A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 100 (1), 57-70 (2000).
  19. Ying, Q. L., et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature. 453 (7194), 519-523 (2008).
  20. Da Silva, B., Mathew, R. K., Polson, E. S., Williams, J., Wurdak, H. Spontaneous glioblastoma spheroid infiltration of early-stage cerebral organoids models brain tumor invasion. SLAS Discov. 23 (8), 862-868 (2018).
  21. Linkous, A., et al. Modeling patient-derived glioblastoma with cerebral organoids. Cell Rep. 26 (12), 3203-3211.e5 (2019).
  22. Garreta, E., et al. Rethinking organoid technology through bioengineering. Nat Mater. 20 (2), 145-155 (2021).
  23. Zhao, X., et al. Review on the vascularization of organoids and organoids-on-a-chip. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 9, 637048 (2021).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

GlioblastomaGBMOrganoid CultureDrug ScreeningLaboratory engineered Glioblastoma Organoid LEGOGenetic CharacteristicsRNA ExpressionDNA MethylationTreatment StratificationGenotype phenotype AssociationsLipid MetabolismLomitapideMicrosomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein Inhibitor

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved