Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
Here, we present a protocol to assess the labeling homogeneity for each protein species in a complex protein sample at the single molecule level.
Cell proteomes are often characterized using electrophoresis assays, where all species of proteins in the cells are non-specifically labeled with a fluorescent dye and are spotted by a photodetector following their separation. Single molecule fluorescence imaging can provide ultrasensitive protein detection with its ability for visualizing individual fluorescent molecules. However, the application of this powerful imaging method to electrophoresis assays is hampered by the lack of ways to characterize the homogeneity of fluorescent labeling of each protein species across the proteome. Here, we developed a method to evaluate the labeling homogeneity across the proteome based on a single molecule fluorescence imaging assay. In our measurement using a HeLa cell sample, the proportion of proteins labeled with at least one dye, which we termed ‘labeling occupancy’ (LO), was determined to range from 50% to 90%, supporting the high potential of the application of single molecule imaging to sensitive and precise proteome analysis.
Proteome analysis, which aims to quantify the entire set of protein molecules expressed in the cell, is a valuable approach in current biological and medicinal studies. This analysis commonly relies on mass spectrometry, which identifies protein species based on spectra generated through protein ionization1,2,3. An alternative method for proteome analysis is electrophoresis, including polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), capillary electrophoresis and two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis. This method relies on non-specific fluorescent labeling of all the protein molecules in the analyzed cells, followed by electrophoretic separation and detection and quantification of each protein species. To achieve the required non-specific protein labeling, one strategy is to use fluorescent dyes that can bind to proteins via electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions, such as Coomassie Blue and Sypro-Ruby4,5,6. An alternative strategy is to use covalent labeling with dyes containing N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester or maleimide, which can covalently bind to proteins through common residues such as primary amines and thiols, respectively7,8.
Meanwhile, the sensitivity of fluorescence detection is ideal for analyzing low-abundance proteins and small numbers of cells. Single molecule fluorescence imaging is one of the most sensitive methods that allows the detection of individual fluorescent dyes and labeled proteins in vitro and in vivo9,10,11,12,13,14,15. Application of this imaging method to electrophoresis-based proteome analysis is expected to enable highly sensitive and quantitative assays by counting individual fluorescently-labeled proteins. However, it remains unclear whether labeling with fluorescent dyes is homogeneous enough across all the protein molecules, and how this homogeneity is affected by different protein species (Figure 1). Simple bulk solution measurements can be used to obtain a molar ratio of fluorescent dyes to proteins called ‘coupling efficiency’8 or ‘labeling efficiency’, but this property does not provide information on the homogeneity of the labeling among protein molecules.
Here, we describe the protocol for an assay to investigate the labeling homogeneity for all protein species in the cell (Figure 2)16. The two key steps of this assay are protein purification and imaging. In the first step, all the proteins in the cells are fluorescently labeled and biotinylated, then extracted separately using gel electrophoresis followed by electroelution. In the second step, fluorescence properties of individual protein molecules in the extracted samples are evaluated based on single molecule imaging. From this data, parameters important for the counting analysis, such as the percentage of proteins labeled with a least one dye, which we call labeling occupancy (LO)16, and the average number of fluorescent dyes bound to a single protein molecule (n̄dye), can be characterized. In the protocol, an optimized procedure for labeling the HeLa cell proteome with NHS ester-based Cyanine 3 (Cy3) dye is presented as an example, and can be modified with other labeling procedures according to desired research goals.
1. Cell preparation
2. Cell lysis and fluorescent labeling
3. Proteome separation and recovery
4. Microscope coverslip preparation
5. Observation with single molecule fluorescence microscopy
6. Image analysis and extraction of information
Figure 4 represents raw image data for different molecular weight fractions of proteins from HeLa cell lysate, as well as the positive and negative control. While both the protein sample and positive control exhibit 100–500 spots per image, the negative control displays none or a few spots, showing that the protocol sufficiently inhibits non-specific binding of dyes to the coverslip surface. Spot intensity histograms for the protein samples and the posi...
This paper describes a protocol to quantify the labeling homogeneity of each labeled protein species in cells after separation with SDS-PAGE (step 3). The separation method can be substituted with other methods such as liquid chromatography or capillary electrophoresis, which allow separation and fractionation of cellular proteins with high resolution, while requiring special equipment23. The labeling method using NHS-ester in the current protocol can be replaced with other methods using maleimide...
The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): RIKEN has filed a patent application on these results with S.L. and Y.T. named as co-inventors.
The authors thank Masae Ohno and Kazuya Nishimura for experimental assistance and advice. This work was supported by PRESTO (JPMJPR15F7), Japan Science and Technology Agency, Grants-in-aid for Young Scientists (A) (24687022), Challenging Exploratory Research (26650055), and Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (23115005), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and by grants from the Takeda Science Foundation and the Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research. S.L. acknowledges support from the RIKEN International Program Associate (IPA) program.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
22x22x0.15 mm coverslip | VWR | 470019-004 | |
488 nm Argon laser | Coherent | Innova 70C | |
488 nm dichroic mirror | Semrock | FF495-Di03 | |
488 nm emission filter | Semrock | FF02-520/28 | |
560 nm dichroic filter | Semrock | Di02-R561 | |
560 nm emission filter | Semrock | FF02-617/73 | |
560 nm fiber laser | MBP Communications | F-04306-2 | |
60x oil immersion lens | Olympus | PLAPON 60x | |
Avidin | Nacalai-tesque | 03553-64 | |
Biotin-PEG-amine | Thermo Scientific | 21346 | |
Biotinylated Alexa Fluor 488 | Nanocs | ||
Borate | Nacalai-tesque | ||
BSA | Sigma-Aldrich | A9547 | |
CHAPS | Dojindo | C008-10 | |
Cy3 NHS-ester dye | GE Healthcare | PA13101 | |
Dialyzer - D-tube, 6-8 kDa | Merck Millipore | 71507-M | |
DMEM | Sigma-Aldrich | ||
DTT | Nacalai-tesque | 14112-94 | |
EDC | Nacalai-tesque | ||
EMCCD camera | Andor | IiXon 897 | |
Epi fluorescence microscope | Olympus | IX81 | |
Gel viewer | GE Healthcare | ImageQuant LAS 4000 | |
Penicillin, streptomycine and Amphoterecin mix | Gibco | ||
Plasma cleaner | Diener Electronic | ||
SDS | Wako | NC0792960 | |
Size purification column 10K | Merck Millipore | UFC5010 | |
Tween 20 | Sigma-Aldrich | P9416 |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone