A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
The present protocol provides a detailed description of a percutaneous dual lumen right ventricular assist device and illustrates step-by-step instructions on the safe implanting, managing, and removing the device. Guidance on its use and troubleshooting complications from one of the most significant single-center experiences is also included.
Right ventricular (RV) shock, classically characterized by elevated central venous pressure (CVP) with normal to low pulmonary artery (PA) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (PCWP), remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide if left untreated. Therapies for the treatment of RV shock range from medical management to durable or percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS). A unique MCS device, a percutaneous right ventricular assist device (pRVAD), approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014, works by temporarily off-loading the RV through a single, dual lumen catheter with extracorporeal mechanical support and is capable of shunting blood from the right atrium (RA) to the main PA. Although initially approved as venous-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) device, this work will focus on the use of RV support, as ambulatory VV-ECMO strategies have been described previously. The catheter is most commonly inserted through the right internal jugular (IJ) vein into the PA and connected to an external pump, allowing flow up to 5 L/min. This device may be an attractive choice for the treatment of RV shock due to its percutaneous, minimally invasive insertion and removal and its ability to allow patient ambulation while the device is in place. This protocol discusses in detail the equipment, hemodynamic effects, indications, contraindications, complications, currently available research in the literature, and step-by-step instructions on how to implant, manage, and extract the device, along with the guidance on use and troubleshooting complications from one of the largest, single-center experiences with the device.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) from right ventricular (RV) failure remains one of the most challenging cardiac pathologies to manage and portends high mortality and morbidity1. There are three primary pathologic states which may result in RV failure: loss of myocardial contractility, volume overload, and pressure overload2. After a heart transplant, loss of RV contractility can be secondary to myocardial ischemia, infarction, or inflammation caused by myocarditis or primary graft dysfunction3. RV volume overload may be secondary to right-sided valvular insufficiency, shunting, or inadequate volume elimination (e.g., renal failure) relative to enteral or intravenous intake4. RV pressure overload may result from worsening pulmonary hypertension (pHTN), pulmonary stenosis, acute pulmonary embolus, or decompensated left-sided heart failure, the most common cause of RV failure5. Percutaneous treatment options have become one of the mainstays for the treatment of RV CS. Besides medical therapy, multiple devices are available to treat RV failure, including the venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), open/central right ventricular assist device (RVAD), Impella RP, TandemHeart RV assist device, and the Protek Duo2.
The Protek Duo is the only minimally invasive percutaneous RVAD (pRVAD) with a dual lumen cannula that allows ambulation while the device is in place6 and is increasingly being used in RV CS to off-load the RV. Although initially approved as a venous-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) device, this work will focus on its use for RV support, as ambulatory VV-ECMO strategies have been described previously7. It off-loads the RV by shunting blood from the RA to pulmonary artery (PA) and allows the option to attach a centrifugal flow extracorporeal continuous flow pump with or without an oxygenator to allow for optimal RV support. The device was approved for use in 2014 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)8. It can provide flows up to 4.5-5 L/min9,10. Its dual lumen catheter design pulls blood via the proximal inflow cannula in the RA and funnels it out via the central PA, essentially bypassing the RV.
The cannula has two distinct lumens with a wire-reinforced body. Two concentric channels for bidirectional flow within one single cannula allow for simultaneous venous drainage and reinfusion of blood during extracorporeal support. The proximal portion of the device is separated and non-wired allowing for external clamping to prevent blood flow during implantation and extraction of the cannula device. For accurate positioning of the device, the cannula is marked with distal and proximal markers to identify the insertion depth. The distal markers are radiopaque, allowing for visualization of the device on radiographic imaging to determine the position of the catheter within the right atrium (RA). Along with markings, there are fenestrations or holes at the distal tip and mid-portion of the catheter. The six side holes at the distal tip allow blood to flow out of the catheter into the PA. The midshaft holes allow deoxygenated blood to flow into the catheter from the RA (Figure 1). This design enables the use of the device pre-, intra-, and post-operatively throughout the continuum of procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). For example, the device was used by us in isolation or as part of bi-ventricular temporary support before a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). It was then converted to a venous drainage cannula for CPB during the procedure (by "Y" connecting the two limbs to the venous drainage limb of the circuit) and then reverting to RA/PA bypass for RVAD support post-operatively. Additionally, the cannula was also used as a PA vent for left ventricular (LV) unloading/venting in the setting of VA-ECMO with LV distension by applying venous drainage to both the RA and PA ports, again in the preparation setting for the CPB procedures and subsequent conversion to RVAD support.
Currently, two sizes are available, the 29 Fr or 31 Fr (Figure 2). These catheters are designed to optimize ease of insertion and, therefore, have a tapered design to allow the device's distal portion to pass through all the cardiac structures safely. Specifically, the 29 Fr tapers to a 16 Fr, and the 31 Fr tapers to an 18 Fr. Both sizes are made of the same materials. According to the FDA, both sizes are identical in tensile strength, pathway integrity, kink radius, and hemolysis rates. They differ regarding the cannula stiffness and pressure-flow properties, which is expected with a change in cannula diameter. Despite their differences, they are determined to be equivalent in functional capabilities. The larger Fr sizes are typically used for those who require more blood flow to achieve optimal hemodynamic support11.
An essential indication for using the pRVAD is refractory RV failure. This includes RV failure status post LVAD placement, post-cardiotomy status, post-acute myocardial infarction, or post heart transplant status12. This device is often used in conjunction with other therapies such as diuretics, inotropic agents, vasopressors, and pulmonary vasodilators to provide an individual optimal hemodynamic support while allowing time for remodeling of the native RV. The device has also been documented to have been used in severe pHTN, as mentioned in the example above, and acute myocarditis13. In our experience, we have had successful weaning from support and discharge from the hospital using the pRVADin severe pHTN; however, such cases are rare, and in general, RVAD support is avoided in the setting of severe hypertension given increased pressure within the PAs, and therefore would favor decompressing the PAs with VA-ECMO (ambulator strategies if prolonged support is necessary) or RA to left atrium bypass configurations when able.
The pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPI) is commonly used with the overall clinical assessment to identify patients who might benefit from minimally invasive management with this device. The PAPI is a validated hemodynamic metric to assess the degree and presence of RV failure. It is calculated using the systolic PA pressure minus the diastolic pulmonary pressure divided by the central venous pressure (CVP). Patients with a PAPI of less than 0.9 should be considered for RV support13. The cardiac power output (CPO) can be calculated with the PAPI to differentiate patients who may benefit from RV support therapy. It is calculated by multiplying the mean arterial pressure by the cardiac output and dividing it by 451. If the CPO is less than 0.6, treatment for RV failure may be warranted. If the CPO is greater than 0.6, there is room for interpretation and discussion of possible other therapies14. However, most evidence recommends RV therapies if the PAPI is less than 0.9, as stated above. Ultimately, the decision for mechanical support is based on clinical assessment with these quantitative metrics as valuable adjuncts in decision making.
Contraindications to use of this mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device include any severe vascular or right heart obstructive pathology, including existing internal jugular (IJ) vein stenosis or thrombosis, severe pulmonary stenosis, and prior tricuspid valve replacement, which precludes safe placement of the device11. A case of acute superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome after a suitable IJ Protek Duo was placed required emergent reconfiguration to an alternate support strategy. In the absence of severe stenosis of the tricuspid valve, tricuspid valve repair is not a contraindication to the use of the device. Pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) is not a contraindication, and there are several reports in the literature of the use of this device within a PVR15. A relative contraindication to using the pRVADis a history of a pneumonectomy due to ligation of one of the proximal branch PAs with this procedure and concern for wire or cannula injury to the PA stump or excessive pressure on the stump by RVAD flow. Additionally, in cases with extensive chest radiation, the tissue may not allow dilation and placement of the cannula, precludingpRVAD placement.
Several complications are associated with the use of this MCS device. One potential risk with treating RV shock with the device is unmasking LV dysfunction or previously unrecognized bi-ventricular dysfunction. For example, sometimes, with RV failure, the LV appears pseudonormal because of significant underfilling of the LV. However, with an RVAD in place, forward flow is optimized, and increased filling of the LV may unmask LV dysfunction. Many times, these patients may need to be converted to VA-ECMO. Furthermore, the prothrombogenic nature of the cannula puts the patient at risk for thromboembolic events. To combat this problem, it is standard therapy that all patients are treated concomitantly with anticoagulation. However, the addition of anticoagulation therapy has its own risk for bleeding complications such as access site bleeding, gastrointestinal tract bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, and risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HITT)16. Interruptions in anticoagulation due to bleeding complications can cause pump thrombosis. The device needs to be exchanged emergently in this setting. The diagnosis needs to be rapidly elucidated among other causes for acute hemodynamic deterioration and low device flow, including sepsis or hypovolemia/hemorrhage.
Despite all its possible complications, this pRVAD is becoming more common in many hospitals across the United States for the noninvasive management of RV failure. Its portable design allows patients to sit, stand and even ambulate freely if positioned and secured appropriately. It can even be easily removed at the bedside after the device has been weaned. The device is FDA approved for use up to 6 days, but there have been reports of use for as long as weeks to months17. The device can be used for VV-ECMO support by adding an oxygenator to the circuit at any point while using the device18. The 31 Fr device also has a rapid deployment (RD) version seen in Figure 3. The RD has been chiefly referenced in literature as a temporary left ventricular support device used as a bridge to other support devices with placement via an apical approach to provide minimally invasive LV support19.
In contrast to the Protek Duo, the Impella RP is a percutaneous device used for RV support that is inserted into the femoral vein, requires strict bed rest, and does not allow ambulation. It also provides an axial flow compared to the Protek Duo, which provides a centrifugal flow. Centrifugal flow devices have lower GI-related bleeding events with comparable stroke rates17. Commonly reported complications of the Impella RP include hemorrhaging (42.9%), vascular problems (22.8%), device fragmentation (34.2%), clotting of the system (17.1%), and device disconnection (8.6%)20. Several other RV support devices2 are currently being studied. They may hit the market in the future, but for now, this dual cannula device remains an attractive choice as a noninvasive percutaneous device for the short-term treatment of RV failure.
The present protocol is approved by the human research ethics committee of the University of Nebraska Medical Center. The protocol follows the guidelines of the human research ethics committee of the same university.
1. Insertion of the device
NOTE: This procedure needs to be ideally performed in a fluoroscopy suite to ensure accurate placement of the device.
2. Connecting, activation, and maintenance of the device
3. Removal of the device
The device initially gained FDA clearance in the United States after a large randomized control trial, which revealed a 31% improvement in survival in treating acute respiratory distress syndrome with the device used as VV_ECMO22. Eventually, it was approved as a RA to PA bypass. However, the device has not yet been approved for use as an RVAD although at many major centers, the device is already being used as an RVAD substitute in many cases. There are currently ongoing multicenter observati...
RV shock portends exceptionally high mortality. It should be recognized early in the disease course and treated aggressively. The Protek Duo is a cutting-edge MCS for the treatment of RV shock that can be placed during any of the SCAI stages of shock. A few critical steps in the placement of the device include: obtaining access using the modified Seldinger technique21, sequential dilatation of the access site to appropriate size Fr sheath, floating a balloon-tipped catheter into the main PA, ...
Poonam Velagapudi discloses the following relationships with industry: Speaker’s bureau- Abiomed, Opsens; advisory board- Abiomed, Sanofi; meals/travel expenses- Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Chiesi, Phillps.
This manuscript would not have been possible without the exceptional support of my mentors, Dr. Poonam Velagapudi and Dr. Anthony Castleberry and support from the entire Cardiovascular and Cardiothoracic Departments at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. No funds were used for the making of this paper.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Amplatzer Super Stiff Wire 0.035' x 145 cm | Boston Scientific | M001465631 | If not in stock, may use any stiff 0.035" wire. |
Avalon Tracheal Dilator | Avalon Laboratories Inc., Rancho Dominguez, CA | 12210 | This comes in a set. The 30 Fr dilator is the only part used. |
Full 29 Protek Duo Kit | LivaNova/ Tandem Life | 5820-2916 | Cannula, pump, holster, wrap |
Full 31 Protek Duo | LivaNova/Tandem Life | 5820-3118 | Cannula, pump, holster, wrap |
Hemochron Signature Elite ACT Testing Device and Supplies | Werfen North America | DCJACT-A and DCJACT-N | |
Lidocaine | Pharmaceutical | Pfizer | |
LifeSPARC Centrifugal Pump | LivaNova/ Tandem Life | 5840-2417 | |
Micropuncture needle | Cook Medical | G56202 | 5 Fr |
Multi-Lumen Access Catheter | Arrow/Teleflex | AK-21242-CDC | 9 Fr |
Preparation solution | Pharmaceutical | NA | Chlorohexidine-based or iodine-based |
Protek Duo Cannula 29Fr | LivaNova/ Tandem Life | 5140-4629 | Components: One 29 Fr ProtekDuo Veno-Venous Wire Reinforced Cannula with radiopaque tip markers, One 13 Fr Introducer |
Protek Duo Cannula 31Fr | LivaNova/Tandem Life | 5140-5131 | - 31 Fr x 51 cm Veno-Venous Dual Lumen Cannula with Introducer |
Protek Duo Insertion Kit | LivaNova/ Tandem Life | 5100-0014 | Components: balloon tipped PA catheter, one 0.035 stiff guidewire |
Protek Duo RD Cannula | LivaNova/Tandem Life | 5820-3631 | Cannula, introducer |
Swan Ganz Catheter | Edwards Lifesciences | 774F75 or 777F8 | |
Ultrasound | Standard vascular ultrasound. | GE | |
Ultrasound probe cover over the ultrasound transducer | Standard probe cover to match vascular ultrasound transducer | GE | |
Voyager Vest Kit | LivaNova/Tandem Life | Contact LivaNova | Includes vest and wrap. Should not be used on patients with a known allergy to neoprene. |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionExplore More Articles
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved