JoVE Logo
Faculty Resource Center

Sign In

Summary

Abstract

Introduction

Protocol

Representative Results

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Materials

References

Neuroscience

Characterizing Multiscale Mechanical Properties of Brain Tissue Using Atomic Force Microscopy, Impact Indentation, and Rheometry

Published: September 6th, 2016

DOI:

10.3791/54201

1Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 4Department of Neurology, The F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School

We present a set of techniques to characterize the viscoelastic mechanical properties of brain at the micro-, meso-, and macro-scales.

To design and engineer materials inspired by the properties of the brain, whether for mechanical simulants or for tissue regeneration studies, the brain tissue itself must be well characterized at various length and time scales. Like many biological tissues, brain tissue exhibits a complex, hierarchical structure. However, in contrast to most other tissues, brain is of very low mechanical stiffness, with Young's elastic moduli E on the order of 100s of Pa. This low stiffness can present challenges to experimental characterization of key mechanical properties. Here, we demonstrate several mechanical characterization techniques that have been adapted to measure the elastic and viscoelastic properties of hydrated, compliant biological materials such as brain tissue, at different length scales and loading rates. At the microscale, we conduct creep-compliance and force relaxation experiments using atomic force microscope-enabled indentation. At the mesoscale, we perform impact indentation experiments using a pendulum-based instrumented indenter. At the macroscale, we conduct parallel plate rheometry to quantify the frequency dependent shear elastic moduli. We also discuss the challenges and limitations associated with each method. Together these techniques enable an in-depth mechanical characterization of brain tissue that can be used to better understand the structure of brain and to engineer bio-inspired materials.

Most soft-tissues comprising biological organs are mechanically and structurally complex, of low stiffness compared to mineralized bone or engineered materials, and exhibit non-linear and time-dependent deformation. Compared to other tissues in the body, brain tissue is remarkably compliant, with elastic moduli E on the order of 100s of Pa 1. Brain tissue exhibits structural heterogeneity with distinct and interdigitated gray and white matter regions that also differ functionally. Understanding brain tissue mechanics will aid in the design of materials and computational models to mimic the response of the brain during injury, facilitate prediction ....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Ethics Statement: All experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Research Committee of Boston Children's Hospital and comply with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

1. Mouse Brain Tissue Acquisition Procedures (for AFM-enabled indentation and impact indentation)

  1. Prepare a ketamine/xylazine mixture to anesthetize the mice. Combine 5 ml ketamine (500 mg/ml), 1 ml xylazine (20 mg/ml) and 7 ml of 0.9% saline solution.
  2. <.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Figure 4 shows representative indentation and force vs. time responses (Figure 4B,E) for creep compliance and force relaxation experiments, given an applied force or indentation depth (Figure 4A,D), respectively. Using these data and the geometry of the system, the creep compliance Jc(t) and force relaxation moduli GR(t) can be calculated for different regions of the brain (Figure 4C,F

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Each technique presented in this paper measures different facets of brain tissue's mechanical properties. Creep compliance and stress relaxation moduli are a measure of time-dependent mechanical properties. The storage and loss moduli represent rate-dependent mechanical properties. Impact indentation also measures rate-dependent mechanical properties, but in the context of energy dissipation. When characterizing tissue mechanical properties, both AFM-enabled indentation and rheology are commonly used methods. AFM-ena.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

We acknowledge support of this work by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society and Simons Center for the Social Brain. BQ acknowledges support from the U.S. National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship program.

....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Xylaxine Lloyd Laboratoried perscription drug
Ketamine AnaSed Injections perscription drug
Vibratome (Vibrating blade microtome) Leica VT1200
Hibernate-A Medium Gibco A1247501 CO2-independent neural medium for adult tissue
Atomic Force Microscope, MFP-3D-BIO Asylum Research -
Petri Dish Heater Asylum Research -
AFM Probe, 0.03 N/m, 10 um radius borosilicate sphere Novascan PT.GS
Cell-Tak Corning 354240 mussel-derived bioadhesive
Sodium Bicarbonate Sigma-Aldrich S5761 alternate suppliers can be used
Sodium Hydroxide, 1N Sigma-Aldrich 59223C alternate suppliers can be used
Instrumented Indenter, NanoTest Vantage Micro Materials Ltd. - probe tip needs to be machined (steel flat punch, 1mm diameter, 4-5 mm length)
NanoTest Liquid Cell Micro Materials Ltd. -
Parallel Plate Rheometer MCR501 Anton-Parr -
PP25  Anton-Parr - 25 mm diameter flat measurement plate
Adhesive Sandpaper McMaster-Carr 4184A48 alternate suppliers can be used
Loctite 4013 Instant Adhesive Henkel 20268 alternate suppliers can be used

  1. van Dommelen, J. A. W., Hrapko, M., Peters, G. W. M. Mechanical Properties of Brain Tissue: Characterisation and Constitutive Modelling. Mechanosensitivity of the Nervous System. , 249-281 (2009).
  2. Liu, F., Tschumperlin, D. J. Micro-mechanical characterization of lung tissue using atomic force microscopy. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (54), e2911 (2011).
  3. Peaucelle, A. AFM-based mapping of the elastic properties of cell walls: at tissue, cellular, and subcellular resolutions. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (89), e51317 (2014).
  4. Thomas, G., Burnham, N. A., Camesano, T. A., Wen, Q. Measuring the mechanical properties of living cells using atomic force microscopy. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (76), e50497 (2013).
  5. Moreno-Flores, S., Benitez, R., Vivanco, M. d. M., Toca-Herrera, J. L. Stress relaxation and creep on living cells with the atomic force microscope: a means to calculate elastic moduli and viscosities of cell components. Nanotechnology. 21, 445101 (2010).
  6. Desprat, N., Richert, A., Simeon, J., Asnacios, A. Creep function of a single living cell. Biophysical Journal. 88 (3), 2224-2233 (2005).
  7. Lu, H., Wang, B., Ma, J., Huang, G., Viswanathan, H. Measurement of creep compliance of solid polymers by nanoindentation. Mechanics Time-Dependent Materials. 7 (3/4), 189-207 (2003).
  8. Cheng, L., Xia, X., Scriven, L. E., Gerberich, W. W. Spherical-tip indentation of viscoelastic material. Mechanics of Materials. 37, 213-226 (2005).
  9. Kalcioglu, Z., Qu, M., Van Vliet, Multiscale characterization of relaxation times of tissue surrogate gels and soft tissues. 7th Army Science Conference Proceedings. , (2010).
  10. Moreno-Flores, S., Benitez, R., Vivanco, M. D., Toca-Herrera, J. L. Stress relaxation microscopy: Imaging local stress in cells. Journal of Biomechanics. 43 (2), 349-354 (2010).
  11. Kalcioglu, Z. I., Qu, M., et al. Dynamic impact indentation of hydrated biological tissues and tissue surrogate gels. Philosophical Magazine. 91 (7-9), 1339-1355 (2011).
  12. Kalcioglu, Z. I., Ra Mrozek, R. a., Mahmoodian, R., VanLandingham, M. R., Lenhart, J. L., Van Vliet, K. J. Tunable mechanical behavior of synthetic organogels as biofidelic tissue simulants. Journal of Biomechanics. 46 (9), 1583-1591 (2013).
  13. Janmey, P. A., Georges, P. C., Hvidt, S. Basic rheology for biologists. Methods in Cell Biology. 83, 3-27 (2007).
  14. Miller, K., Kurtcuoglu, V. . Biomechanics of the Brain. , (2011).
  15. Lévy, R., Maaloum, M. Measuring the spring constant of atomic force microscope cantilevers: thermal fluctuations and other methods. Nanotechnology. 13 (1), 33-37 (2002).
  16. Fuierer, R. Basic Operation Procedures for the Asylum Research MFP-3D Atomic Force Microscope. MFP-3D Procedureal Operation "Manualette". , (2006).
  17. Elkin, B. S., Ilankovan, A., Morrison, B. Age-dependent regional mechanical properties of the rat hippocampus and cortex. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 132, 011010 (2010).
  18. Elkin, B. S., Azeloglu, E. U., Costa, K. D., Morrison, B. Mechanical heterogeneity of the rat hippocampus measured by atomic force microscope indentation. Journal of Neurotrauma. 24 (5), 812-822 (2007).
  19. Lee, E. H., Radok, J. R. M. The Contact Problem for Visooelastic Bodies. Journal of Applied Mechanics. 27 (3), 438-444 (1960).
  20. Lin, D. C., Dimitriadis, E. K., Horkay, F. Robust strategies for automated AFM force curve analysis--I. Non-adhesive indentation of soft, inhomogeneous materials. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 129 (3), 430-440 (2007).
  21. Constantinides, G., Kalcioglu, Z. I., McFarland, M., Smith, J. F., Van Vliet, K. J. Probing mechanical properties of fully hydrated gels and biological tissues. Journal of Biomechanics. 41 (15), 3285-3289 (2008).
  22. Shen, F., Tay, T. E., et al. Modified Bilston Nonlinear Viscoelastic Model for Finite Element Head Injury Studies. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering -- Transactions of the ASME. 128 (5), 797-801 (2006).
  23. van Dommelen, J. a. W., vander Sande, T. P. J., Hrapko, M., Peters, G. W. M. Mechanical properties of brain tissue by indentation: Interregional variation. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 3 (2), 158-166 (2010).
  24. Rother, J., Nöding, H., Mey, I., Janshoff, A. Atomic force microscopy-based microrheology reveals significant differences in the viscoelastic response between malign and benign cell lines. Open biology. 4 (5), 140046 (2014).
  25. Du, P., Lu, H., Zhang, X. Measuring the Young's Relaxation Modulus of PDMS Using Stress Relaxation Nanoindentation. Symposium DD - Microelectromechanical Systems - Materials and Devices III. 1222 (c), (2009).
  26. Elkin, B. S., Morrison, B. Viscoelastic properties of the P17 and adult rat brain from indentation in the coronal plane. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 135, 114507 (2013).
  27. Brands, D. W., Bovendeerd, P. H., Peters, G. W., Wismans, J. S., Paas, M. H., van Bree, J. L. Comparison of the dynamic behavior of brain tissue and two model materials. 43rd Stapp Car Crash Conference Proceedings. , 313-320 (1999).
  28. Hrapko, M., van Dommelen, J. A. W., Peters, G. W. M., Wismans, J. S. H. M. Characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of brain tissue in compression and shear. Biorheology. 45 (6), 663-676 (2008).
  29. Pogoda, K., Chin, L., et al. Compression stiffening of brain and its effect on mechanosensing by glioma cells. New Journal of Physics. 16 (7), 075002 (2014).
  30. Peters, G. W. M., Meulman, J. H., Sauren, A. A. H. J. The applicability of the time/temperature superposition principle to brain tissue. Biorheology. 34 (2), 127-138 (1997).

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved