A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Here, two murine wound healing models are described, one designed to assess cellular and cytokine wound healing responses and the other to quantify the rate of wound closure. These methods can be used with complex disease models such as diabetes to determine mechanisms of various aspects of poor wound healing.
Wound healing is a complex process that requires the orderly progression of inflammation, granulation tissue formation, fibrosis, and resolution. Murine models provide valuable mechanistic insight into these processes; however, no single model fully addresses all aspects of the wound healing response. Instead, it is ideal to use multiple models to address the different aspects of wound healing. Here, two different methods that address diverse aspects of the wound healing response are described. In the first model, polyvinyl alcohol sponges are subcutaneously implanted along the mouse dorsum. Following sponge retrieval, cells can be isolated by mechanical disruption, and fluids can be extracted by centrifugation, thus allowing for a detailed characterization of cellular and cytokine responses in the acute wound environment. A limitation of this model is the inability to assess the rate of wound closure. For this, a tail skin excision model is utilized. In this model, a 10 mm x 3 mm rectangular piece of tail skin is excised along the dorsal surface, near the base of the tail. This model can be easily photographed for planimetric analysis to determine healing rates and can be excised for histological analysis. Both described methods can be utilized in genetically altered mouse strains, or in conjunction with models of comorbid conditions, such as diabetes, aging, or secondary infection, in order to elucidate wound healing mechanisms.
There are many murine model systems available to examine wound healing processes, each possessing specific advantages and limitations1,2. The following methods present two murine wound models, each of which addresses a particular aspect of the wound healing response, and which can be used to identify the cause and effect of perturbations in the response to injury. The process of wound healing occurs in distinct phases. The first phase is inflammatory, characterized by the rapid influx of platelets, neutrophils, and monocytes/macrophages, as well as the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Fo....
All animal studies described here were approved by the Brown University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and carried out in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Animals of the National Institutes of Health. NOTE: in the video, the surgical drape has been omitted for demonstration purposes.Â
1. Subcutaneous implantation of PVA sponges
Systemic inflammatory response following PVA sponge implantation
The PVA sponge implantation surgery generated a systemic inflammatory response, as demonstrated by the induction of IL-6 in the plasma 1 day after wounding (Figure 2A). Other proinflammatory cytokines including TNF-α and IL-1β, as well as an array of chemokines including CCL2 and CXCL1 were induced systemically in the first 7 days post-PVA sponge implantation, and have been described elsewhere
This article describes two tractable murine wound models that allow for the assessment of the acute wound healing response. The first method involves the surgical implantation of PVA sponges in the dorsal subcutaneous space. This approach offers a distinct advantage over biopsy-based wound models for studying the cellular wound healing response due to the large number of cells and quantity of wound fluids obtained from the isolated sponges. For the successful execution of this procedure, maintaining a sterile surgical fi.......
The authors would like to thank Kevin Carlson of the Brown University Flow Cytometry and Sorting Facility for consultation and assistance with flow cytometry experiments. Images in Figure 1B and C were created with BioRender. Kayla Lee and Gregory Serpa are thanked for their photographic assistance. This work was supported by grants from the following: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) YFAA15 D15AP00100, Dean’s Areas of Emerging New Science Award (Brown University), National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) 1R01HL126887-01A1, National Institute of Environmental Science (NIES) T32-ES7272 (Training in Environmental Pathology), and the Brown U....
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
10x Phosphate Buffered Saline | Fisher Scientific | BP3991 | |
15 mL centrifuge tubes, Olympus | Genesee | 28-103 | |
1x HBSS (+Calcium, +Magnesium, –Phenol Red) | ThermoFisher Scientific | 14025076 | |
5ml Syringe | BD | 309646 | |
Anti-mouse CD45.2-APC Fire750 | BioLegend | 109852 | Clone 104 |
Anti-mouse F4/80-eFluor660 | ThermoFisher Scientific | 50-4801-82 | Clone BM8 |
Anti-mouse Ly6C-FITC | BD Biosciences | 553104 | Clone AL-21 |
Anti-mouse Ly6G-PerCP-eFluor710 | ThermoFisher Scientific | 46-9668-82 | Clone 1A8-Ly6g |
Anti-mouse Siglec-F-APC-R700 | BD Biosciences | 565183 | Clone E50-2440 |
Autoclip Stainless Steel Wound Clip Applier | Braintree Scientific | NC9021392 | |
Autoclip Stainless Steel Wound Clips, 9mm | Braintree Scientific | NC9334081 | |
Blender Bag, 80mL | Fisher Scientific | 14258201 | |
Culture Tube, 16mL, 17x100 | Genesee Scientific | 21-130 | |
Fetal Bovine Serum - Standard | ThermoFisher Scientific | 10437028 | |
Fixable Viability Dye eFluor506 | ThermoFisher Scientific | 65-0866-14 | |
Hepes Solution, 1M | Genesee Scientific | 25-534 | |
ImageJ Software | NIH | ||
Penicillin-Streptomycin (5000 U/mL) | ThermoFisher Scientific | 15070-063 | |
Polyvinyl alcohol sponge - large pore size | Ivalon/PVA Unlimited | www.sponge-pva.com | |
Povidone-iodine solution, 10% | Fisher Scientific | 3955-16 | |
Spray barrier film, Cavilon | 3M | 3346E | |
Stomacher 80 Biomaster, 110V | Seward | 0080/000/AJ |
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
ABOUT JoVE
Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved