A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
* These authors contributed equally
Described here is a proximity labeling method for identification of interaction partners of the TIR domain of the NLR immune receptor in Nicotiana benthamiana leaf tissue. Also provided is a detailed protocol for the identification of interactions between other proteins of interest using this technique in Nicotiana and other plant species.
Proximity labeling (PL) techniques using engineered ascorbate peroxidase (APEX) or Escherichia coli biotin ligase BirA (known as BioID) have been successfully used for identification of protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in mammalian cells. However, requirements of toxic hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in APEX-based PL, longer incubation time with biotin (16–24 h), and higher incubation temperature (37 °C) in BioID-based PL severely limit their applications in plants. The recently described TurboID-based PL addresses many limitations of BioID and APEX. TurboID allows rapid proximity labeling of proteins in just 10 min under room temperature (RT) conditions. Although the utility of TurboID has been demonstrated in animal models, we recently showed that TurboID-based PL performs better in plants compared to BioID for labeling of proteins that are proximal to a protein of interest. Provided here is a step-by-step protocol for the identification of protein interaction partners using the N-terminal Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain of the nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NLR) protein family as a model. The method describes vector construction, agroinfiltration of protein expression constructs, biotin treatment, protein extraction and desalting, quantification, and enrichment of the biotinylated proteins by affinity purification. The protocol described here can be easily adapted to study other proteins of interest in Nicotiana and other plant species.
PPIs are the basis of various cellular processes. Traditional methods for identifying PPIs include yeast-two-hybrid (Y2H) screening and immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry (IP-MS)1. However, both suffer from some disadvantages. For example, Y2H screening requires the availability of Y2H library of the target plant or animal species. Construction of these libraries is labor-intensive and expensive. Furthermore, the Y2H approach is performed in the heterologous single-cell eukaryotic organism yeast, which may not represent the cellular status of higher eukaryotic cells.
In contrast, IP-MS shows low efficiency in capturing transient or weak PPIs, and it is also unsuitable for those proteins with low abundance or high hydrophobicity. Many important proteins involved in the plant signaling pathways such as receptor-like kinases (RLKs) or the NLR family of immune receptors are expressed at low levels and often interact with other proteins transiently. Therefore, it greatly restricts the understanding of mechanisms underlying the regulation of these proteins.
Recently, proximity labeling (PL) methods based on engineered ascorbate peroxidase (APEX) and a mutant Escherichia coli biotin ligase BirAR118G (known as BioID) have been developed and utilized for the study of PPIs2,3,4. The principle of PL is that a target protein of interest is fused with an enzyme, which catalyzes the formation of labile biotinyl-AMP (bio-AMP). These free bio-AMP are released by PL enzymes and diffuse to the vicinity of the target protein, allowing the biotinylation of proximal proteins at the primary amines within an estimated radius of 10 nm5.
This approach has significant advantages over the traditional Y2H and IP-MS approaches, such as the ability to capture transient or weak PPIs. Furthermore, PL allows the labeling of proximal proteins of the target protein in their native cellular environments. Different PL enzymes have unique disadvantages when applying them to different systems. For example, although APEX offers higher tagging kinetics compared to BioID and is successfully applied in mammalian systems, the requirement of toxic hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in this approach makes it unsuitable for PL studies in plants.
In contrast, BioID-based PL avoids use of the toxic H2O2, but the rate of labeling is slow (requiring 18–24 h to complete biotinylation), thus making the capture of transient PPIs less efficient. Moreover, the higher incubation temperature (37 °C) required for efficient PL by BioID introduces external stress to some organisms, such as plants4. Therefore, limited deployment of BioID-based PL in plants (i.e., rice protoplasts, Arabidopsis, and N. benthamiana) has been reported6,7,8,9. The recently described TurboID enzyme overcomes the deficiencies of APEX and BioID-based PL. TurboID showed high activity that enables the accomplishment of PL within 10 min at RT10. TurboID-based PL has been successfully applied in mammalian cells, flies, and worms10. Recently, we and other research groups independently optimized and extended the use of TurboID-based PL for studying PPIs in different plant systems, including N. benthamiana and Arabidopsis plants and tomato hairy roots11,12,13,14. Comparative analyses indicated that TurboID performs better for PL in plants compared to BioID11,14. It has also demonstrated the robustness of TurboID-based PL in planta by identifying a number of novel interactions with an NLR immune receptor11, a protein whose interaction partners are usually difficult to obtain using traditional methods.
This protocol illustrates the TurboID-based PL in planta by describing the identification of interaction proteins of the N-terminal TIR domain of the NLR immune receptor in N. benthamiana plants. The method can be extended to any proteins of interest in N. benthamiana. More importantly, it provides an important reference for investigating PPIs in other plant species such as Arabidopsis, tomato, and others.
NOTE: An overview of the method is shown in Figure 1.
1. Plant material preparation
2. Construction of TurboID fusions
3. Agroinfiltration
4. Leaf sample collection
NOTE: For subsequent processing of the leaf samples, wear sterile gloves to avoid keratin contamination of the samples. All reagents should also be as keratin-free as possible.
5. Extraction of leaf total protein
6. Removal of free biotin by desalting
NOTE: This section takes about 50 min.
7. Quantification of the desalted protein extracts using a Bradford assay
8. Enrichment of biotinylated proteins
The representative data, which illustrate the expected results based on the described protocol, are adapted from Zhang et al11. Figure 1 summarizes the procedures for performing TurboID-based PL in N. benthamiana. Figure 2 shows the protein expression and biotinylation in the infiltrated N. benthamiana leaves. Figure 3 shows that the biotinylated proteins in the infiltrated leaves were effic...
The TurboID biotin ligase is generated by yeast display-based directed evolution of the BioID10. It has many advantages over other PL enzymes. TurboID allows the application of PL to other model systems, including flies and worms, whose optimal growth temperature is around 25 °C10. Although the PL approach has been widely used in animal systems, its application in plants is limited. The protocol described here provides a step-by-step procedure for establishing the Turb...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by grants from the National Transgenic Science and Technology Program (2019ZX08010-003 to Y.Z.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872637 to Y.Z.), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019TC028 to Y.Z.), and NSF-IOS-1354434, NSF-IOS-1339185, and NIH-GM132582-01 to S.P.D.K.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
721 Spectrophotometer | Metash, made in China | Q/SXFZ6 | For OD600 measurement |
Ammonium bicarbonate | Sigma | A6141-500G | |
Biotin | Sigma | B4639-1G | 50 mM Stock |
Centrifuge | Eppendorf | Centrifuge 5702 | |
Centrifuge | Eppendorf | Centrifuge 5417R | |
cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail | Roche | 11697489001 | |
Deoxycholic acid | Sigma | D2510-100G | |
DL-Dithiothreitol (DTT) | VWR Life Science | 0281-25G | |
Dynabeads MyOne Streptavidin C1 | Invitrogen | 65001 | For affinity purification |
EDTA | Sigma | E6758-500G | |
ELISA plate | Corning | Costar 3590 | |
HEPES | Sigma | H3375-1KG | |
Hydrochloric acid (HCl) | Fisher Scientific | A144S-212 | |
Immobilon-P PVDF membrane | Millipore | IPVH00010 | For Western blot analysis |
Lithium chloride solution(LiCl), 8M | Sigma | L7026-500ML | |
Low speed refrigerated centrifuge | Zonkia, made in China | KDC-2046 | For desalting |
Magnesium Chloride, Hexahydrate (MgCl2·6H2O) | Sigma | M9272-500G | |
Magnetic rack | Invitrogen | 123.21D | For bead adsorption |
Multiskan FC Microplate Photometer | Thermo Fisher Scientific | N07710 | For OD595 measurement |
NP-40 (IGEPAL CA-630) | Sigma | I8896-100ML | |
Rat anti-HA | Roche | 11867423001 | |
Rotational mixer | Kylin-Bell Lab Instrument | WH-986 | For IP |
Shock incubator | Labotery, made in China | ZQPZ-228 | |
Sodium Chloride (NaCl) | Fisher Scientific | S271-3 | |
Sodium deoxycholate | Sigma | D2510-100G | |
Sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS) | Sigma | L4390-1KG | |
Streptavidin-HRP | Abcam | ab7403 | |
Triton X-100 | Fisher Scientific | BP151-100 | |
Trizma base | Sigma | T1503-1KG | |
Vortex | Scientific Industries | G-560E | |
Water-jacket Incubator | Blue pard, made in China | GHP-9080 | For Agrobacterium incubation |
Zeba Spin Desalting Column | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 89893 | For removal of biotin |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved