A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

We present a protocol to generate a minimally invasive orthotopic pancreatic cancer model by ultrasound-guided injection of human pancreatic cancer cells and the subsequent monitoring of tumor growth in vivo by ultrasound imaging.

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer (PCa) represents one of the deadliest cancer types worldwide. The reasons for PCa malignancy mainly rely on its intrinsic malignant behavior and high resistance to therapeutic treatments. Indeed, despite many efforts, both standard chemotherapy and innovative target therapies have substantially failed when moved from preclinical evaluation to the clinical setting. In this scenario, the development of preclinical mouse models better mimicking in vivo characteristics of PCa is urgently needed to test newly developed drugs. The present protocol describes a method to generate a mouse model of PCa, represented by an orthotopic xenograft obtained by ultrasound-guided injection of human pancreatic tumor cells. Using such a reliable and minimally invasive protocol, we also provide evidence of in vivo engraftment and development of tumor masses, which can be monitored by ultrasound (US) imaging. A noteworthy aspect of the PCa model described here is the slow development of the tumor masses over time, which allows precise identification of the starting point for pharmacological treatments and better monitoring of the effects of therapeutic interventions. Moreover, the technique described here is an example of implementation of the 3Rs principles since it minimizes pain and suffering and directly improves the welfare of animals in research.

Introduction

PCa, and its most common form, the Pancreatic Ductal Adeno Carcinoma (PDAC), is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death with a 1-year survival rate lower than 20% and a 5-year survival rate of 8%, regardless of the stage1,2. The disease is almost always fatal, and its incidence is forecasted to continuously grow in the next years, unlike other cancer types, whose incidence is declining3. Factors such as late cancer detection, the tendency of rapid progression, and lack of specific therapies lead to a poor prognosis of PCa4. Great advances in cancer research have been obtained, thanks to the development of more accurate preclinical mouse models. The models have provided appropriate insights to the understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying cancer and to the development of new treatments5. These advances poorly apply to PCa, which, despite great recent efforts, remains resistant to current chemotherapeutic therapies1. For these reasons, the development of novel approaches to improve patients' prospects is mandatory.

Over the years, many PCa mouse models have been developed, including xenografts, which are the most widely used models nowadays5. Xenograft models are classified as subcutaneous heterotopic and orthotopic, depending on the location of the implanted tumor cells. Subcutaneous heterotopic xenografts are easier and cheaper to accomplish but miss certain characteristic features of PCa (i.e., the peculiar tumor microenvironment, characterized by the accumulation of fibrotic tissue, hypoxia, acidity, and angiogenesis)6,7. This explains why subcutaneous xenografts often fail to provide robust data for therapeutic treatments leading to failures when translated to the clinical setting8. On the other hand, orthotopic xenografts resemble the tumor microenvironment more closely, leading to better mimicking of the natural development of the disease. In addition, orthotopic xenografts are more suitable for studying the metastatic process and the invasive features of PCa, which almost do not occur in subcutaneous models9. Overall, orthotopic xenograft mouse models are nowadays preferred to perform preclinical drug testing9,10. Orthotopic xenografts usually rely on surgical procedures to implant either cells or very small tumor tissue pieces into the pancreas. Indeed, several papers based on surgical models of PCa have been published in the last few decades11. However, the quality and the outcome of the surgical procedure for the establishment of an orthotopic tumor model strongly depend on the technical skill of the operator. Another key point for a successful orthotopic PCa xenograft for a translational clinical approach is the possibility to establish localized disease with predictable growth kinetics.

To address these issues, here we describe an innovative procedure to produce an orthotopic PCa xenograft, exploiting ultrasound (US)-guided injection of human PCa cells into the tail of the pancreas in immunodeficient mice. This procedure generates a reliable PCa mouse model. The tumor growth is followed in vivo by US imaging.

Protocol

The present protocol received approval from the Italian Ministry of Health with the authorization number 843/2020-PR. In order to ensure aseptic conditions, the animals were maintained inside the barrier room of the research animal vivarium (Ce.S.A.L.) of the University of Florence. All procedures were performed in the same space where the mice were housed at the LIGeMA facility of the University of Florence (Italy).

1. Cell preparation

  1. Culture PCa cells from the PCa cell line in a 100 mm Petri dish containing Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 2% L-glutamine and 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS).
  2. Incubate the cells in normoxia at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
  3. Detach the cells with trypsin. Count, and resuspend 1 x 106 cells in 20 µL of PBS, 1 h before inoculation.

2. Mouse preparation for ultrasound-guided injection (US-GI)

NOTE: Following steps were performed under sterile conditions. The entire procedure of US-guided injection, from the beginning of the anesthesia until the mouse is removed from the animal platform, takes around 10-12 min plus 5 min for complete mouse recovery.

  1. Just before the intervention, administer carprofen (NSAID) subcutaneously (s.c.) at a final dose of 5 mg/kg or tramadol at a final dose of 5 mg/kg using a tuberculin syringe with a 27 G needle.
    NOTE: For the present protocol, 20 Athymic Nude-Foxn1nu female mice were used. The mice were 8 weeks old and weighed 20-22 g.
  2. Turn on the imager and select Mouse (Small) Abdominal on the application menu from the transducer panel. Ensure that the B-Mode (Brightness Mode) imaging window appears, and the system is ready to acquire B-Mode data.
    NOTE: B-Mode is the system's default imaging mode. The system displays echoes in a two-dimensional (2D) view by assigning a brightness level based on the echo signal amplitude. B-Mode is the most effective mode for locating anatomical structures.
    1. Go to the Study Browser.
    2. Select New Study and type the study name and information, i.e., date of the study, etc.
    3. Fill in all the necessary information in the Series Name, i.e., animal strain, ID, date of birth, etc.
    4. Tap Done; the program is ready for B-mode imaging.
  3. Anesthetize the mouse in the anesthesia induction chamber using 4% isoflurane with a gas flow of 2 L/min of O2.
    NOTE: Approximately 4 min are sufficient for proper anesthesia (breathing around 50-60 breaths per min).
  4. Once the mouse is anesthetized, change the connection of the anesthetic machine to direct the isoflurane toward the mouse handling table.
  5. Place the anesthetized mouse on its right flank onto the handling table (heated at 37 °C) with its snout in a nose cone to ensure that the mouse is anesthetized using 2% isoflurane with a gas flow of 0.8 L/min of O2 (Figure 1A).
  6. Apply a drop of artificial tears on the mouse's eyes to prevent dryness while under anesthesia.
  7. Tape the right hand, right foot, and tail firmly onto the electrode pads on the animal platform with adhesive gauze.
    NOTE: The mouse's respiration rate and electrocardiogram (ECG) are recorded through the electrode pads.

3. Injection of PANC1 cells in the pancreas by US-GI method

  1. Sanitize the mouse skin with 70% ethanol and keep the skin of the left flank stretched using adhesive gauze.
    NOTE: Keeping the skin stretched is important to reduce resistance to the insertion of the needle and to prevent needle deformations.
  2. Apply ultrasound gel on the abdomen and left flank of the mouse using a 20 mL syringe (without the needle).
  3. Using the height control knob of the US transducer, lower the transducer to touch the left flank of the mouse and place it transversely to the body of the animal.
  4. Move the transducer to visualize the pancreas on the transducer display using B-Mode imaging (Figure 1B).
  5. Prepare a 50 µL Hamilton syringe, containing 1 x 106 PANC1 cells suspended in 20 µL of PBS, with a 30 mm 28 G needle and place the syringe on the appropriate holder (Figure 1C).
    NOTE: Before using, sanitize the syringe needle with 70% ethanol for a period of 5-10 minutes.
  6. Using the holder micromanipulator, lower the syringe to the mouse skin, with the needle bevel face up and in the same plane as the ultrasound transducer, forming an angle of 45° with the transducer (Figure 1D).
    NOTE: From this step onward, proceed by monitoring the US image on the display.
  7. Using the micromanipulator, perforate the skin and insert the syringe needle into the pancreas and observe the US image on the display, to follow its trajectory (Figure 1E).
    NOTE: Before injection, take the tail of the pancreas as a reference which is located behind the spleen and close to the left kidney.
  8. Once the needle is inserted into the pancreas, inject a 20 µL bolus containing the cells directly into the pancreas by applying constant pressure on the syringe plunger (Figure 1F).
    NOTE: The correct injection procedure is checked by the presence of a small bubble in the pancreas and the flow of hypoechogenic fluid, which is barely visible from the needle tip.
  9. Leave the needle in place for 5-10 s after the whole bolus is injected, and then slowly retract it.
  10. Remove the US transducer, clean the gel from the flank, and place the mouse alone in a new cage. Observe the animal until it has regained sufficient consciousness to maintain sternal recumbency.

4. 3D US imaging for monitoring pancreatic tumors in mice

NOTE: The evaluation of tumor development was performed starting 8 days after the cell injection, using the same instrument used for the US-guided injection (listed in Table of Materials). Hence, some procedures, such as the system ignition (step 2.2.), anesthesia (steps 2.3. - 2.6.), and mouse placement on the animal platform (step 2.7.), fully match what was described above in the protocol.

  1. Before starting the US imaging, set up the workstation as shown in Figure 2A.
  2. Fix the transducer on the 3D motor system (Figure 2A).
  3. Turn on the imager and select New Study on the Study Browser.
  4. Place the mouse in the anesthesia induction chamber (4% isoflurane).
  5. Place the anesthetized mouse on its right flank onto the handling table heated at 37 °C with its snout in the anesthetic tube and reduce isoflurane to 2% (Figure 2B).
    NOTE: It is important that the mouse is placed in the same position as the US-guided injection, to maintain the same anatomical references.
  6. Apply a drop of vet ointment on the mouse's eyes.
  7. Apply a layer of ultrasound gel on the mouse's abdomen and left flank.
  8. Position the 55 MHz transducer in the transverse orientation to touch the left flank skin such that the pancreas is approximately centered (Figure 2C).
  9. Use the 3D motor to acquire images of the whole pancreas in the transverse orientation, ideally gathering 90-100 frames per acquisition (number of frames may vary depending on personal choice).
    1. Select the 3D Motor Position on the imager touchpad.
    2. Indicate the scanning distance by moving the cursor to acquire images of the whole pancreas from both extremities.
    3. Select Scan Frames and begin 3D acquisition.
  10. Once 3D imaging is done, remove the transducer, clean the gel from the skin, and place the mouse alone in a new cage for recovery. Observe the animal until it has regained sufficient consciousness to maintain sternal recumbency.

Results

Following the protocol described above, mice were first anesthetized in an isoflurane chamber, and placed on the animal platform (Figure 1A). The pancreas was visualized with ultrasound imaging (Figure 1B). A 50 µL Hamilton syringe was loaded with 1 x 106 PANC1 cells suspended in 20 µL of PBS and placed on the needle holder (Figure 1C). The optimal angle between the syringe and the US transducer was 45° (

Discussion

Although the use of US imaging is widespread in the clinic, tumor development in many preclinical mouse models is usually described using bioluminescent imaging11. The latter is an indirect way to evaluate tumor engraftment and expansion and it also does not provide a reliable tumor growth kinetics. In the present study, we have applied US imaging for performing cell injection as well as for monitoring tumor development. The protocol we have described and the results we have provided represent a r...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC, grant no. 15627, IG 21510, and IG 19766) to AA, PRIN Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR). Leveraging basic knowledge of ion channel network in cancer for innovative therapeutic strategies (LIONESS) 20174TB8KW to AA, pHioniC: European Union's Horizon 2020 grant No 813834 to AA. CD was supported by a AIRC fellowship for Italy ID 24020.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
100 mm Petri dishSarstedt, GermanyP5856
3D-Mode packageVisualsonics Fujifilm, ItalyIncludes the 3D Motor; necessary for volumetric imaging
Aquasonic 100, Sonypack 5 lt Ultrasound Transmission GelPARKER LABORATORIES, INC.150Gel for ultrasound
Athymic Mice (Nude-Foxn1nu)ENVIGO, Italy6920 females, 8 weeks old, Athymic Nude-Foxn1nu, 20-22 g body weight
CO2 Incubator Function LineHeraeus Instruments, GermanyBB16-ICN2
Display of ECG, Respiration Waveform and body temperatureVisualsonics Fujifilm, Italy11426
DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium)Euroclone Spa, ItalyECM0101L
DPBS (Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline)Euroclone Spa, ItalyECB4004L
Eppendorf (1.5mL)Sarstedt, Germany72.690.001
FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum)Euroclone Spa, ItalyECS0170L
Hamilton Needle Pointstyle 4, lenght 30 mm, 28 GaugePermax S.r.l., Italy7803-02
Hamilton Syringe 705RM 50 µLPermax S.r.l., Italy7637-01
Isoflo (250 mL)Ecuphar7081219
L-glutamine 100XEuroclone Spa, ItalyECB3000D
Mouse Handling table IIVisualsonics Fujifilm, Italy50249
MX550D: 55 MHz MX Series TransducerVisualsonics Fujifilm, Italy51069Ultrasound Transducers
Oxygen/isofluorane mixerAngelo Franceschini S.r.l.LFY-I-5A
PANC1 cell lineAmerican Type Culture Collection (ATCC), USACRL-1469
Rimadyl (carprofen)Pfizer1131920 mL, injection solution
Trypsin-EDTA 1X in PBSEuroclone Spa, ItalyECB3052D
Vet ointment for eyes, Systane nighttimeAlcon509/28555-1
Vevo Compact Dual Anesthesia System (Tabletop Version)Visualsonics Fujifilm, ItalyVS-12055complete with gas chamber
Vevo Imaging Station 2Visualsonics Fujifilm, ItalyVS-11983Imaging WorkStation 1 plus Imaging Station Extension with injection mount
Vevo LabVisualsonics Fujifilm, ItalyVS-20034Data Analysis Software
Vevo LAZR-X Photoacoustic Imaging SystemVisualsonics Fujifilm, ItalyVS-20054Includes analytic software package for B-mode
Vevo Photoacoustic EnclosureVisualsonics Fujifilm, Italy53157

References

  1. Zeng, S., et al. Chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 20 (18), 4504 (2019).
  2. Bray, F., et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 68 (6), 394-424 (2018).
  3. Rahib, L., et al. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: The unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the united states. Cancer Research. 74 (11), 2913-2921 (2014).
  4. Rawla, P., Sunkara, T., Gaduputi, V. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: Global trends, etiology and risk factors. World Journal of Oncology. 10 (1), 10 (2019).
  5. Herreros-Villanueva, M., Hijona, E., Cosme, A., Bujanda, L. Mouse models of pancreatic cancer. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 18 (12), 1286-1294 (2012).
  6. Hofschroer, V., et al. Ion channels orchestrate pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression and therapy. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 11, 586599 (2021).
  7. Adamska, A., Domenichini, A., Falasca, M. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Current and evolving therapies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 18 (7), 1338 (2017).
  8. Qiu, W., Su, G. H. Development of orthotopic pancreatic tumor mouse models. Methods in Molecular Biology. 980, 215-223 (2013).
  9. Killion, J. J., Radinsky, R., Fidler, I. J. Orthotopic models are necessary to predict therapy of transplantable tumors in mice. Cancer Metastasis Reviews. 17 (3), 279-284 (1998).
  10. Qiu, W., Su, G. H. Challenges and advances in mouse modeling for human pancreatic tumorigenesis and metastasis. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews. 32 (1-2), 83-107 (2013).
  11. Erstad, D. J., et al. Orthotopic and heterotopic murine models of pancreatic cancer and their different responses to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. DMM Disease Models and Mechanisms. 11 (7), (2018).
  12. Lottini, T., et al. Micro-ultrasound, non-linear contrast mode with microbubbles and Optical Flow software tool: together for a new translational method in the study of the tumoral rheology microenvironment. WMIC 2017: Imaging the Future from Molecules to Medicine. , (2017).
  13. Ludders, J. W. Advantages and guidelines for using isoflurane. The Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice. 22 (2), 328-331 (1992).
  14. Huynh, S., et al. Development of an orthotopic human pancreatic cancer xenograft model using ultrasound guided injection of cells. PLoS One. 6 (5), 20330 (2011).
  15. Duranti, C., et al. Harnessing the hERG1/β1 Integrin Complex via a Novel Bispecific Single-chain Antibody: An Effective Strategy against Solid Cancers. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 20 (8), 1338-1349 (2021).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Orthotopic XenograftPancreatic CancerUltrasound guided InjectionCell EngraftmentTumor DevelopmentMinimally Invasive Technique3Rs PrinciplesAthymic Nude Foxn 1nu MiceB Mode ImagingPANC1 CellsInjection ProtocolAnimal ModelResearch Methodology

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved