The authors have no acknowledgements.

Ethics statement: All animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
1. Prepare Cancer Cells for Injection
<ol>
	<li>Seed the cancer cells one or two days before injection. Use DMEM/F12 media supplemented with 10% FBS, unless a specialty medium is indicated in literature for a particular cell line.</li>
	<li>On the day of surgical operation, harvest cells when they reach 70 - 80% confluence by first washing with serum-free media once before trypsinization (0.25%) for 1 - 2 min at 37 &#176;C. Add into cells 10% FBS-containing DMEM/F12 media to quench the 0.25% trypsin.</li>
	<li>Centrifuge the cells at 80 &#215; g for 3 min. Wash cells in serum-free media twice to remove residual serum, count the cells with a hemocytometer and re-suspend in Hank&#39;s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) at 1 - 5 &#215; 106 cells/ml, depending on the cell line. Keep on ice until time of injection. 
	NOTE: MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and K1735 melanoma cells were used in this study, and both cell lines were used at 2 &#215; 106 cells/ml concentration. Keep the trypsinization duration as short as possible as overtreatment may influence the outcomes of metastasis assays.</li>
</ol>
2. Prepare Mice for Tumor Cell Injection
<ol>
	<li>Anesthetize mice by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of ketamine/xylazine cocktail (ketamine 100 mg/kg, xylazine 10 mg/kg).</li>
	<li>Confirm complete anesthesia by pinching the animal feet and observe lack of response.</li>
	<li>Place the mouse on a glass plate (used for casting protein gels), and secure with rubber bands.</li>
	<li>If necessary, remove the hair of neck by shaving or applying a small amount of hair removal product and wiping the hair off with paper towel. NOTE: If using nude mice, skip this step as they do not have body hair.</li>
	<li>Clean the neck skin by applying povidone-iodine and 70% alcohol.</li>
	<li>Place mouse on stage of the dissecting microscope</li>
	<li>Make an incision in the skin ~ 1 cm long with a surgical scalpel.</li>
	<li>Bluntly dissect the muscle with toothed forceps to expose the carotid artery underneath.</li>
	<li>Separate the carotid artery from the adjacent vagus nerve with surgical forceps.</li>
	<li>Using surgical forceps, separate some cotton from a cotton ball, moisten, and fashion into a smaller cotton ball. Place this buffer-moisturized cotton ball underneath the carotid artery of intended site of injection.</li>
	<li>Place a suture distal and proximal to the cotton ball and make loose knots. Tighten the proximal knot to block the blood flow into the injection site.</li>
	<li>Proceed to cancer cell injection if the carotid artery on the cotton ball appears fully pressurized with fresh red blood.</li>
</ol>
3. Cancer Cell Injection into Carotid Artery
<ol>
	<li>Vortex and draw 100 &#181;l of cancer cells into the syringe.</li>
	<li>Under the dissecting microscope, slowly insert the 31 G needle (with bevel up) into the lumen of the carotid artery sitting on top of the cotton ball.</li>
	<li>Slowly inject the cells from the syringe into the carotid artery. Successful injection can be observed under the microscope by the changing color of nearby blood vessels and musculature when buffered cancer cells are pushed into the circulation.</li>
	<li>When injection of the entire volume is complete, lift the distal carotid artery gently to prevent regurgitation.</li>
	<li>Quickly tighten the distal knot to complete the injection process.</li>
	<li>After completing the injection, tighten the ligatures and trim the excess silk suture with micro-scissors under the dissecting microscope. Move back the separated muscle to cover the wound site. Close the skin with two staples.</li>
</ol>
4. Surgical Recovery
<ol>
	<li>Move the operated animal onto a heating pad for recovery. It may take 30 - 60 min for the animals to regain consciousness. In the meantime, administer buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg) via subcutaneous injection as post-surgical analgesia. &#160;Note: Analgesia should be provided according to your&#160;local IACUC approved protocol.&#160;</li>
	<li>Once the animals awaken and resume their normal behavior, return the mice to their housing location. Provide mice with gel food for several days post-surgery. Maintain a surgical record and keep it in the room.</li>
</ol>
5. Non-invasive In Vivo Imaging
<ol>
	<li>For cells labelled with luciferase reporter constructs, measure cancer cell injection efficiency using in vivo imaging system14. 
	NOTE: Imaging is not performed on the day of injection to avoid excessive stress to research animals.</li>
</ol>

<ol>
	<li>Gavrilovic, I. T., Posner, J. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Brain+metastases:+epidemiology+and+pathophysiology.">Brain metastases: epidemiology and pathophysiology.</a> J Neurooncol. 75 (1), 5-14 (2005).</li><li>Patchell, R. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+management+of+brain+metastases.">The management of brain metastases.</a> Cancer Treat Rev. 29 (6), 533-540 (2003).</li><li>Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Incidence+proportions+of+brain+metastases+in+patients+diagnosed+(1973+to+2001)+in+the+Metropolitan+Detroit+Cancer+Surveillance+System.">Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System.</a> J Clin Oncol. 22 (14), 2865-2872 (2004).</li><li>Schouten, L. J., Rutten, J., Huveneers, H. A., Twijnstra, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Incidence+of+brain+metastases+in+a+cohort+of+patients+with+carcinoma+of+the+breast,+colon,+kidney,+and+lung+and+melanoma.">Incidence of brain metastases in a cohort of patients with carcinoma of the breast, colon, kidney, and lung and melanoma.</a> Cancer. 94 (10), 2698-2705 (2002).</li><li>Bendell, J. C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Central+nervous+system+metastases+in+women+who+receive+trastuzumab-based+therapy+for+metastatic+breast+carcinoma.">Central nervous system metastases in women who receive trastuzumab-based therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma.</a> Cancer. 97 (12), 2972-2977 (2003).</li><li>Clayton, A. J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Incidence+of+cerebral+metastases+in+patients+treated+with+trastuzumab+for+metastatic+breast+cancer.">Incidence of cerebral metastases in patients treated with trastuzumab for metastatic breast cancer.</a> Br J Cancer. 91 (4), 639-643 (2004).</li><li>Romond, E. H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Trastuzumab+plus+adjuvant+chemotherapy+for+operable+HER2-positive+breast+cancer.">Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer.</a> N Engl J Med. 353 (16), 1673-1684 (2005).</li><li>Mayer, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+patient+perspective+on+brain+metastases+in+breast+cancer.">A patient perspective on brain metastases in breast cancer.</a> Clin Cancer Res. 13 (6), 1623-1624 (2007).</li><li>Lin, N. U., Bellon, J. R., Winer, E. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=CNS+metastases+in+breast+cancer.">CNS metastases in breast cancer.</a> J Clin Oncol. 22 (17), 3608-3617 (2004).</li><li>Zhang, C., Yu, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Microenvironment+determinants+of+brain+metastasis+of+brain+metastasis.">Microenvironment determinants of brain metastasis of brain metastasis.</a> Cell Biosci. 1 (1), 8 (2011).</li><li>Fidler, I. J., Nicolson, G. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Organ+selectivity+for+implantation+survival+and+growth+of+B16+melanoma+variant+tumor+lines.">Organ selectivity for implantation survival and growth of B16 melanoma variant tumor lines.</a> J Natl Cancer Inst. 57 (5), 1199-1202 (1976).</li><li>Zhang, L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Microenvironment-induced+PTEN+loss+by+exosomal+microRNA+primes+brain+metastasis+outgrowth.">Microenvironment-induced PTEN loss by exosomal microRNA primes brain metastasis outgrowth.</a> Nature. 527 (7576), 100-104 (2015).</li><li>Zhang, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=SRC+family+kinases+as+novel+therapeutic+targets+to+treat+breast+cancer+brain+metastases.">SRC family kinases as novel therapeutic targets to treat breast cancer brain metastases.</a> Cancer Res. 73 (18), 5764-5774 (2013).</li><li>Lim, E., Modi, K. D., Kim, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=In+vivo+bioluminescent+imaging+of+mammary+tumors+using+IVIS+spectrum.">In vivo bioluminescent imaging of mammary tumors using IVIS spectrum.</a> J Vis Exp. (26), (2009).</li><li>Zhang, C., Zhang, F., Tsan, R., Fidler, I. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Transforming+growth+factor-beta2+is+a+molecular+determinant+for+site-specific+melanoma+metastasis+in+the+brain.">Transforming growth factor-beta2 is a molecular determinant for site-specific melanoma metastasis in the brain.</a> Cancer Res. 69 (3), 828-835 (2009).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

The most critical steps for successful carotid arterial injection of cancer cells are: 1) deep anesthesia of mouse in preparation for surgical operation; 2) steady placement of carotid artery on top of the cotton support; 3) tight ligation of carotid artery after successful injection.
Deep anesthesia of ~ 30 min is usually necessary for steady surgical performance under the dissecting microscope. We use commercially ready-to-use ketamine/xylazine cocktail for mouse anesthesia. To avoid potenti...

The metastasis of cancer to the central nervous system (CNS) is a devastating disease, and can involve either the brain parenchyma or the leptomeninges (&#34;brain metastasis&#34; refers to both in this article). It is the predominant intracranial malignancy, outnumbering primary gliomas by &#62; 10:11,2. Lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the top three major neoplastic diseases that produce high incidences of brain metastasis3,4. In recent years, impressive advances in novel cancer therapies have dramatically prolonged survival and improved quality of life for many cancer patients. However, upon recurrence, the incidence of brain metastasis is rising rapidly. For example, the anti-HER2 antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin) has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in patients with HER2+ breast cancer; yet a disturbing trend has emerged in these patients: up to 1/3 of those whose extracranial systemic disease initially benefited from trastuzumab treatment later develop brain metastasis5,6,7. Sadly, patients with brain metastasis are refractory to almost all current treatments, usually experiencing a traumatic deterioration of quality of life, and their one-year survival after diagnosis is only ~ 20%8. Current therapies for brain metastasis (including steroids, cranial radiotherapy, and surgical resection in selected patients) are merely palliative, not curative9. Therefore, brain metastasis is emerging as the next imposing challenge in this era of novel cancer therapies. To address the unmet challenge patients face every day in the clinic, we urgently need to better understand the underlying mechanism of brain metastasis and use this knowledge to develop novel therapies.
Successful colonization of the brain by metastatic cancer cells requires performance of a series of functions mediated by the intricate interaction of multiple biological players, such as the bypass of the blood brain barrier (BBB) and escape from the brain&#39;s intrinsic immune defensive mechanisms10, none of which is recapitulated in an ex vivo or in vitro system. Hence, proper and faithful in vivo models are critical for studies of brain metastasis. A conventional in vivo metastasis assay introduces cancer cells via tail vein injection, leading the majority of cells to become lodged in the lung. Brain metastatic lesions are rarely produced in these models before animal death caused by tumor burden in the lungs11. Direct intracerebral injection of cancer cells produces consistent tumor outgrowth in the CNS and is widely used in the studies of primary gliomas. However, such injection compromises the BBB and causes traumatic injury at the site of injection, both major points of concern as to the physiological relevance of this model. Another frequently used cancer cell introduction route, intracardiac injection, is easy to administer and does produce experimental metastasis to the CNS. However, concurrent metastases to organ sites other than the CNS are always produced and may cause animal mortality11; therefore, the high degree of variability of this model makes it inappropriate for quantitative evaluation of biological mechanisms or therapeutic agents with a limited number of animals.
Here we describe the procedures to produce experimental brain metastasis via the injection of cancer cells into the common carotid artery. We have used this approach to dissect individual genes&#39; contributions to the metastatic cascade of brain metastasis and to evaluate efficacy of therapeutic interventions12,13. The major advantages of this approach are the high degree of reproducibility and low degree of variability; the major disadvantage is the sophistication and dexterity required to perform the microsurgery.

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="1156">
	<tbody>
		<tr height="21">
			<td height="21" style="height:21px;width:447px;">Ketamine hydrochloride/xylazine hydrochloride solution</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">Sigma-Aldrich</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">K113</td>
			<td style="width:411px;"></td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="21">
			<td height="21" style="height:21px;width:447px;"></td>
			<td style="width:151px;"></td>
			<td style="width:151px;"></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="21">
			<td height="21" style="height:21px;width:447px;">Routine Stereomicroscope Leica M50</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">Leica</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">M50</td>
			<td>The microscope is modular and highly configurable to fit particular space requirements.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="21">
			<td height="21" style="height:21px;width:447px;"></td>
			<td style="width:151px;"></td>
			<td style="width:151px;"></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="21">
			<td height="21" style="height:21px;width:447px;">Surgical disposable scapel</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">Integra Miltex</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">4-410</td>
			<td>to make skin incisions</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="21">
			<td height="21" style="height:21px;width:447px;">Tissue Forceps - 1x2 Teeth</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">Fine Science Tools</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">11021-12</td>
			<td>to bluntly dissect mucles</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="21">
			<td height="21" style="height:21px;width:447px;">Dumont #5 - Mirror Finish Forceps</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">Fine Science Tools</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">11252-23</td>
			<td>to separate and prepare the carotid artery for injection</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="21">
			<td height="21" style="height:21px;width:447px;">Spring Scissors</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">Fine Science Tools</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">15025-10</td>
			<td>to cut sutures</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="21">
			<td height="21" style="height:21px;width:447px;">EZ Clip Kit</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">Stoelting</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">59020</td>
			<td>for wound cloure</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="21">
			<td height="21" style="height:21px;width:447px;">BD Insulin Syringe</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">Becton Dickinson</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">328438</td>
			<td>for cell injection</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="21">
			<td height="21" style="height:21px;width:447px;"></td>
			<td style="width:151px;"></td>
			<td style="width:151px;"></td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="21">
			<td height="21" style="height:21px;width:447px;">IVIS Spectrum In Vivo Imaging System</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">PerkinElmer</td>
			<td style="width:151px;">124262</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

intracarotid cancer cell injection to produce mouse models of brain metastasis

Metastasis, the spread and growth of malignant cells at secondary sites within a patient&#39;s body, accounts for &#62; 90% of cancer-related mortality. Recently, impressive advances in novel therapies have dramatically prolonged survival and improved quality of life for many cancer patients. Sadly, incidence of brain metastatic recurrences is fast rising, and all current therapies are merely palliative. Hence, good experimental animal models are urgently needed to facilitate in-depth studies of the disease biology and to assess novel therapeutic regimens for preclinical evaluation. However, the standard in vivo metastasis assay via tail vein injection of cancer cells produces predominantly lung metastatic lesions; animals usually succumb to the lung tumor burden before any meaningful outgrowth of brain metastasis. Intracardiac injection of tumor cells produces metastatic lesions to multiple organ sites including the brain; however, the variability of tumor growth produced with this model is large, dampening its utility in evaluating therapeutic efficacy. To generate reliable and consistent animal models for brain metastasis study, here we describe a procedure for producing experimental brain metastasis in the house mouse (Mus musculus) via intracarotid injection of tumor cells. This approach allows one to produce large number of brain metastasis-bearing mice with similar growth and mortality characteristics, thus facilitating research efforts to study basic biological mechanisms and to assess novel therapeutic agents.

There are two points at which the quality of injection can be evaluated. The first chance is by the operator&#39;s observation of changing blood vessel colors during injection. Leakage from poor injections can be easily observed under the dissecting microscope. The steady and secure placement of the mouse body (Figure 1A) and its carotid artery (Figure 1B) on the supporting cotton ball are critical factors for smooth and successful injection into the caro...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Intracarotid Cancer Cell Injection to Produce Mouse Models of Brain Metastasis at JoVE.com

Intracarotid Cancer Cell Injection to Produce Mouse Models of Brain Metastasis

Brain metastasis has become an urgent unmet medical need as its incidence has increased while therapeutic options have remained palliative. Creating experimental animal models of brain metastasis via intracarotid arterial injection of cancer cells facilitates mechanistic studies of the disease biology and evaluation of novel intervention regimens.

Metastasis, the spread and growth of malignant cells at secondary sites within a patient&#39;s body, accounts for &#62; 90% of cancer-related mortality. ...

intracarotid-cancer-cell-injection-to-produce-mouse-models-brain

Research

JoVE Journal

Cancer Research

26.2K Views.  The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Brain metastasis has become an urgent unmet medical need as its incidence has increased while therapeutic options have remained palliative. Creating experimental animal models of brain metastasis via intracarotid arterial injection of cancer cells facilitates mechanistic studies of the disease biology and evaluation of novel intervention regimens.

Video: Intracarotid Cancer Cell Injection to Produce Mouse Models of Brain Metastasis

Intra-iliac Artery Injection for Efficient and Selective Modeling of Microscopic Bone Metastasis

Intra-iliac artery (IIA) injection is an efficient approach to introduce metastatic lesions of various cancer cells in animals. Compared to the widely used intra-cardiac and intra-tibial injections, IIA injection brings several advantages. First, it can deliver a large quantity of cancer cells specifically to hind limb bones, thereby providing spatiotemporally synchronized early-stage colonization events and allowing robust quantification and swift detection of disseminated tumor cells. Second, it injects cancer cells into the circulation without damaging the local tissues, thereby avoiding inflammatory and wound-healing processes that confound the bone colonization process. Third, IIA injection causes very little metastatic growth in non-bone organs, thereby preventing animals from succumbing to other vital metastases, and allowing continuous monitoring of indolent bone lesions. These advantages are especially useful for the inspection of progression from single cancer cells to multi-cell micrometastases, which has largely been elusive in the past. When combined with cutting-edge approaches of biological imaging and bone histology, IIA injection can be applied to various research purposes related to bone metastases.

This manuscript provides the detailed procedure of intra-iliac artery (IIA) injection, a technique to deliver cancer cells specifically to hind limb tissues including bones to establish experimental bone metastases. Although initially established with breast tumor models, this protocol can be easily extended to other cancer types.

Intra-iliac artery (IIA) injection is an efficient approach to introduce metastatic lesions of various cancer cells in animals. Compared to the widely ...

Surgical Procedures and Methodology for a Preclinical Murine Model of De Novo Mammary Cancer Metastasis

A rate-limiting aspect of transgenic mouse models of mammary adenocarcinoma is that primary tumor burden in mammary tissue typically defines study end-points. Thus, studies focused on elucidating mechanisms of late-stage de novo metastasis are compromised, as are studies examining efficacy of anti-cancer therapies targeting mediators of metastasis in the adjuvant setting. Numerous murine mammary cancer models have been developed via targeted expression of dominant oncoproteins to mammary epithelial cells yielding models variably mimicking histopathologic and transcriptome-defined breast cancer subtypes common in women1. While much has been learned regarding the biology of mammary carcinogenesis with these models, their utility in identifying molecules regulating growth of late-stage metastasis are compromised as mice are typically euthanized at earlier time points due to significant primary tumor burden. Moreover, since a significant percentage of women diagnosed with breast cancer receive adjuvant therapy after surgical resection of primary tumors and prior to presence of detectable metastatic disease, preclinical models of de novo metastasis are urgently needed as platforms to evaluate new therapies aimed at targeting metastatic foci. To address these deficiencies, we developed a murine model of de novo mammary cancer metastasis, wherein primary mammary tumors are surgically resected, and metastatic foci subsequently develop over a 115 day post-surgical period. This long latency provides a tractable model to identify functionally significant regulators of metastatic progression in mice lacking primary tumor, as well as a model to evaluate preclinical therapeutic efficacy of agents aimed at blocking functionally significant molecules aiding metastatic tumor survival and growth.

Surgical Procedures and Methodology for a Preclinical Murine Model of De Novo Mammary Cancer Metastasis

Pre-clinical models evaluating adjuvant therapy targeting breast cancer metastasis are lacking. To address this, we developed a murine model of de novo pulmonary mammary adenocarcinoma metastasis, wherein therapies administered in the adjuvant setting (post surgical resection of primary tumors) can be evaluated for efficacy in impacting previously seeded pulmonary metastases.

A rate-limiting aspect of transgenic mouse models of mammary adenocarcinoma is that primary tumor burden in mammary tissue typically defines study ...

A Portal Vein Injection Model to Study Liver Metastasis of Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women worldwide. Liver metastasis is involved in upwards of 30% of cases with breast cancer metastasis, and results in poor outcomes with median survival rates of only 4.8 - 15 months. Current rodent models of breast cancer metastasis, including primary tumor cell xenograft and spontaneous tumor models, rarely metastasize to the liver. Intracardiac and intrasplenic injection models do result in liver metastases, however these models can be confounded by concomitant secondary-site metastasis, or by compromised immunity due to removal of the spleen to avoid tumor growth at the injection site. To address the need for improved liver metastasis models, a murine portal vein injection method that delivers tumor cells firstly and directly to the liver was developed. This model delivers tumor cells to the liver without complications of concurrent metastases in other organs or removal of the spleen. The optimized portal vein protocol employs small injection volumes of 5 - 10 &#956;l, &#8805; 32 gauge needles, and hemostatic gauze at the injection site to control for blood loss. The portal vein injection approach in Balb/c female mice using three syngeneic mammary tumor lines of varying metastatic potential was tested; high-metastatic 4T1 cells, moderate-metastatic D2A1 cells, and low-metastatic D2.OR cells. Concentrations of &#8804; 10,000 cells/injection results in a latency of ~ 20 - 40 days for development of liver metastases with the higher metastatic 4T1 and D2A1 lines, and &#62; 55 days for the less aggressive D2.OR line. This model represents an important tool to study breast cancer metastasis to the liver, and may be applicable to other cancers that frequently metastasize to the liver including colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinomas.

A surgical procedure was developed to deliver mammary tumor cells to the murine liver via portal vein injection. This model permits investigation of late stages of liver metastasis in a fully immune competent host, including tumor cell extravasation, seeding, survival, and metastatic outgrowth in the liver.

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in women worldwide. Liver metastasis is involved in upwards of 30% of cases with breast ...

Generation of Prostate Cancer Cell Models of Resistance to the Anti-mitotic Agent Docetaxel

Microtubule targeting agents (MTAs) are a mainstay in the treatment of a wide range of tumors. However, acquired resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs is a common mechanism of disease progression and a prognostic-determinant feature of malignant tumors. In prostate cancer (PC), resistance to MTAs such as the taxane Docetaxel dictates treatment failure as well as progression towards lethal stages of disease that are defined by a poor prognosis and high mortality rates. Though studied for decades, the array of mechanisms contributing to acquired resistance are not completely understood, and thus pose a significant limitation to the development of new therapeutic strategies that could benefit patients in these advanced stages of disease. In this protocol, we describe the generation of Docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer cell lines that mimic lethal features of late-stage prostate cancer, and therefore can be used to study the mechanisms by which acquired chemoresistance arises. Despite potential limitations intrinsic to a cell based model, such as the loss of resistance properties over time, the Docetaxel-resistant cell lines produced by this method have been successfully used in recent studies and offer&#160;the opportunity to advance our molecular understanding of acquired chemoresistance in lethal prostate cancer.

Resistance to cancer therapies contributes to disease progression and death. Determining the mechanistic underpinnings of resistance is crucial for improving therapeutic response. This manuscript details the protocol to generate taxane-resistant cell models of prostate cancer (PC) to help dissecting the pathways involved in progression to Docetaxel resistance in PC patients.

Microtubule targeting agents (MTAs) are a mainstay in the treatment of a wide range of tumors. However, acquired resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs is a ...

Live-Cell Imaging Assays to Study Glioblastoma Brain Tumor Stem Cell Migration and Invasion

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor that is poorly controlled with the currently available treatment options. Key features of GBMs include rapid proliferation and pervasive invasion into the normal brain. Recurrence is thought to result from the presence of radio- and chemo-resistant brain tumor stem cells (BTSCs) that invade away from the initial cancerous mass and, thus, evade surgical resection. Hence, therapies that target BTSCs and their invasive abilities may improve the otherwise poor prognosis of this disease. Our group and others have successfully established and characterized BTSC cultures from GBM patient samples. These BTSC cultures demonstrate fundamental cancer stem cell properties such as clonogenic self-renewal, multi-lineage differentiation, and tumor initiation in immune-deficient mice. In order to improve on the current therapeutic approaches for GBM, a better understanding of the mechanisms of BTSC migration and invasion is necessary. In GBM, the study of migration and invasion is restricted, in part, due to the limitations of existing techniques which do not fully account for the in vitro growth characteristics of BTSCs grown as neurospheres. Here, we describe rapid and quantitative live-cell imaging assays to study both the migration and invasion properties of BTSCs. The first method described is the BTSC migration assay which measures the migration toward a chemoattractant gradient. The second method described is the BTSC invasion assay which images and quantifies a cellular invasion from neurospheres into a matrix. The assays described here are used for the quantification of BTSC migration and invasion over time and under different treatment conditions.

Here, we describe live-cell imaging techniques to quantitatively measure the migration and invasion of glioblastoma brain tumor stem cells over time and under multiple treatment conditions.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor that is poorly controlled with the currently available treatment options. Key features of GBMs include ...

Patient-derived Orthotopic Xenograft Models for Human Urothelial Cell Carcinoma and Colorectal Cancer Tumor Growth and Spontaneous Metastasis

Cancer patients have poor prognoses when lymph node (LN) involvement is present in both high-grade urothelial cell carcinoma (HG-UCC) of the bladder and colorectal cancer (CRC). More than 50% of patients with muscle-invasive UCC, despite curative therapy for clinically-localized disease, will develop metastases and die within 5 years, and metastatic CRC is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US. Xenograft models that consistently mimic UCC and CRC metastasis seen in patients are needed. This study aims to generate patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) models of UCC and CRC for primary tumor growth and spontaneous metastases under the influence of LN stromal cells mimicking the progression of human metastatic diseases for drug screening. Fresh UCC and CRC tumors were obtained from consented patients undergoing resection for HG-UCC and colorectal adenocarcinoma, respectively. Co-inoculated with LN stromal cell (LNSC) analog HK cells, luciferase-tagged UCC cells were intra-vesically (IB) instilled into female non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice, and CRC cells were intra-rectally (IR) injected into male NOD/SCID mice. Tumor growth and metastasis were monitored weekly using bioluminescence imaging (BLI). Upon sacrifice, primary tumors and mouse organs were harvested, weighed, and formalin-fixed for Hematoxylin and Eosin and immunohistochemistry staining. In our unique PDOX models, xenograft tumors resemble patient pre-implantation tumors. In the presence of HK cells, both models have high tumor implantation rates measured by BLI and tumor weights, 83.3% for UCC and 96.9% for CRC, and high distant organ metastasis rates (33.3% detected liver or lung metastasis for UCC and 53.1% for CRC). In addition, both models have zero mortality from the procedure. We have established unique, reproducible PDOX models for human HG-UCC and CRC, which allow for tumor formation, growth, and metastasis studies. With these models, testing of novel therapeutic drugs can be performed efficiently and in a clinically-mimetic manner.

This protocol describes the generation of patient-derived orthotopic xenograft models by intra-vesically instilling high-grade urothelial cell carcinoma cells or intra-rectally injecting colorectal cancer cells into non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) mice for primary tumor growth and spontaneous metastases under the influence of lymph node stromal cells, which mimics the progression of human metastatic diseases.

Cancer patients have poor prognoses when lymph node (LN) involvement is present in both high-grade urothelial cell carcinoma (HG-UCC) of the bladder and ...

Pathological Analysis of Lung Metastasis Following Lateral Tail-Vein Injection of Tumor Cells

Metastasis, the primary cause of morbidity and mortality for most cancer patients, can be challenging to model preclinically in mice. Few spontaneous metastasis models are available. Thus, the experimental metastasis model involving tail-vein injection of suitable cell lines is a mainstay of metastasis research. When cancer cells are injected into the lateral tail-vein, the lung is their preferred site of colonization. A potential limitation of this technique is the accurate quantification of the metastatic lung tumor burden. While some investigators count macrometastases of a pre-defined size and/or include micrometastases following sectioning of tissue, others determine the area of metastatic lesions relative to normal tissue area. Both of these quantification methods can be exceedingly difficult when the metastatic burden is high. Herein, we demonstrate an intravenous injection model of lung metastasis followed by an advanced method for quantifying metastatic tumor burden using image analysis software. This process allows for investigation of multiple end-point parameters, including average metastasis size, total number of metastases, and total metastasis area, to provide a comprehensive analysis. Furthermore, this method has been reviewed by a veterinary pathologist board-certified by the American College of Veterinary Pathologists (SEK) to ensure accuracy.

Intravenous injection of cancer cells is often used in metastasis research, but the metastatic tumor burden can be difficult to analyze. Herein, we demonstrate a tail-vein injection model of metastasis and include a novel approach to analyze the resulting metastatic lung tumor burden.

Metastasis, the primary cause of morbidity and mortality for most cancer patients, can be challenging to model preclinically in mice. Few spontaneous ...

Modeling Brain Metastasis Via Tail-Vein Injection of Inflammatory Breast Cancer Cells

Metastatic spread to the brain is a common and devastating manifestation of many types of cancer. In the United States alone, about 200,000 patients are diagnosed with brain metastases each year. Significant progress has been made in improving survival outcomes for patients with primary breast cancer and systemic malignancies; however, the dismal prognosis for patients with clinical brain metastases highlights the urgent need to develop novel therapeutic agents and strategies against this deadly disease. The lack of suitable experimental models has been one of the major hurdles impeding advancement of our understanding of brain metastasis biology and treatment. Herein, we describe a xenograft mouse model of brain metastasis generated via tail-vein injection of an endogenously HER2-amplified cell line derived from inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), a rare and aggressive form of breast cancer. Cells were labeled with firefly luciferase and green fluorescence protein to monitor brain metastasis, and quantified metastatic burden by bioluminescence imaging, fluorescent stereomicroscopy, and histologic evaluation. Mice robustly and consistently develop brain metastases, allowing investigation of key mediators in the metastatic process and the development of preclinical testing of new treatment strategies.

We describe a xenograft mouse model of breast cancer brain metastasis generated via tail-vein injection of an endogenously HER2-amplified inflammatory breast cancer cell line.

Metastatic spread to the brain is a common and devastating manifestation of many types of cancer. In the United States alone, about 200,000 patients are ...

The Establishment and Utilization of Patient Derived Xenograft Models of Central Nervous System Metastasis

The development of novel therapies for central nervous system (CNS) metastasis has been hindered by the lack of preclinical models that accurately represent the disease. Patient derived xenograft (PDX) models of CNS metastasis have been shown to better represent the phenotypic and molecular characteristics of the human disease, as well as better reflect the heterogeneity and clonal dynamics of human patient tumors compared to historic cell line models. There are multiple sites that can be used to implant patient-derived tissue when setting up preclinical trials, each with their own advantages and disadvantages, and each suited for studying different aspects of the metastatic cascade. Here, the protocol describes how to establish PDX models and present three different approaches for utilizing CNS metastasis PDX models in pre-clinical studies, discussing each of their applications and limitations. These include flank implantation, orthotopic injection in the brain, and intracardiac injection. Subcutaneous flank implantation is the easiest to monitor and, therefore, most convenient for pre-clinical studies. In addition, metastases to brain and other tissues from flank implantation were observed, indicating that the tumor has undergone multiple steps of metastasis, including intravasation, extravasation, and colonization. Orthotopic injection in the brain is the best option for recapitulating the brain tumor microenvironment and is useful for determining the efficacy of biologics to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) but bypasses most steps of the metastatic cascade. Intracardiac injection facilitates metastasis to the brain and is also useful for studying organ tropism. While this method forgoes earlier steps of the metastatic cascade, these cells will still have to survive circulation, extravasate, and colonize. The utility of a PDX model, is therefore, impacted by the route of tumor inoculation and the choice of which one to utilize should be dictated by the scientific question and overall goals of the experiment.

Central nervous system metastasis PDX models represent the phenotypic and molecular characteristics of human metastasis, making them excellent models for preclinical studies. Described here is how to establish PDX models and the inoculation routes that are best used for preclinical studies.

The development of novel therapies for central nervous system (CNS) metastasis has been hindered by the lack of preclinical models that accurately ...

Portal Vein Injection of Colorectal Cancer Organoids to Study the Liver Metastasis Stroma

Hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), a major component of the tumor microenvironment, play a crucial role in metastatic CRC progression and predict poor patient prognosis. However, there is a lack of satisfactory mouse models to study the crosstalk between metastatic cancer cells and CAFs. Here, we present a method to investigate how liver metastasis progression is regulated by the metastatic niche and possibly could be restrained by stroma-directed therapy. Portal vein injection of CRC organoids generated a desmoplastic reaction, which faithfully recapitulated the fibroblast-rich histology of human CRC liver metastases. This model was tissue-specific with a higher tumor burden in the liver when compared to an intra-splenic injection model, simplifying mouse survival analyses. By injecting luciferase-expressing tumor organoids, tumor growth kinetics could be monitored by in vivo imaging. Moreover, this preclinical model provides a useful platform to assess the efficacy of therapeutics targeting the tumor mesenchyme. We describe methods to examine whether adeno-associated virus-mediated delivery of a tumor-inhibiting stromal gene to hepatocytes could remodel the tumor microenvironment and improve mouse survival. This approach enables the development and assessment of novel therapeutic strategies to inhibit hepatic metastasis of CRC.

Portal vein injection of colorectal cancer (CRC) organoids generates stroma-rich liver metastasis. This mouse model of CRC hepatic metastasis represents a useful tool to study tumor-stroma interactions and develop novel stroma-directed therapeutics such as adeno-associated virus-mediated gene therapies.

Hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), a major component of the ...