Name: harvesting and disaggregation: an overlooked step in biofilm methods research
Uploaded: 2022-04-22T12:30:00
Description: Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Harvesting and Disaggregation: An Overlooked Step in Biofilm Methods Research at JoVE.com

We wish to acknowledge Danielle Orr Goveia, Blaine Fritz, Jennifer Summers and Fei San Lee for their contributions to this paper.

1. Vortexing and sonication
<ol>
	<li>Grow a mature P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442 biofilm grown according to ASTM Standard E25622.</li>
	<li>At the end of the 48 h growth period, prepare to treat the biofilm and sample coupons according to ASTM Standard E28718</li>
	<li>Aseptically insert autoclaved splash guards into sterile 50 mL conical tubes using flame-sterilized forceps. Repeat for all tubes that will receive treatment. Tubes for control coupons...

<ol>
	<li>Donlan, R. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Biofilms:+microbial+life+on+surfaces.">Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces.</a> Emerging Infectious Diseases. 8 (9), 881-890 (2002).</li><li>ASTM International. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=ASTM+Standard+E2562,+2017,+Standard+Test+Method+for+Quantification+of+Pseudomonas+aeruginosa+Biofilm+Grown+with+High+Shear+and+Continuous+Flow+using+CDC+Biofilm+Reactor.">ASTM Standard E2562, 2017, Standard Test Method for Quantification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Grown with High Shear and Continuous Flow using CDC Biofilm Reactor.</a> ASTM International. , (2017).</li><li>Azeredo, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Critical+review+on+biofilm+methods.">Critical review on biofilm methods.</a> Critical Reviews In Microbiology. 43 (3), 313-351 (2017).</li><li>Gomes, I. B., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Standardized+reactors+for+the+study+of+medical+biofilms:+a+review+of+the+principles+and+latest+modifications.">Standardized reactors for the study of medical biofilms: a review of the principles and latest modifications.</a> Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 38 (5), 657-670 (2018).</li><li>Goeres, D. M., et al., Simoes, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Design+and+fabrication+of+biofilm+reactors.">Design and fabrication of biofilm reactors.</a> Recent Trends in Biofilm Sciences and Technology. , 71-88 (2020).</li><li>Goeres, D. M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+method+for+growing+a+biofilm+under+low+shear+at+the+air-liquid+interface+using+the+drip+flow+biofilm+reactor.">A method for growing a biofilm under low shear at the air-liquid interface using the drip flow biofilm reactor.</a> Nature Protocols. 4 (5), 783-788 (2009).</li><li>ASTM International. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=ASTM+Standard+E2871,+Standard+Test+Method+for+Determining+Disinfectant+Efficacy+Against+Biofilm+Grown+in+the+CDC+Biofilm+Reactor+Using+the+Single+Tube+Method.">ASTM Standard E2871, Standard Test Method for Determining Disinfectant Efficacy Against Biofilm Grown in the CDC Biofilm Reactor Using the Single Tube Method.</a> ASTM International. , (2019).</li><li>Goeres, D. M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Validation+of+a+Biofilm+Efficacy+Test:+The+Single+Tube+Method.">Validation of a Biofilm Efficacy Test: The Single Tube Method.</a> Journal of Microbiological Methods. , (2019).</li><li>The development and validation of a standard in vitro method to evaluate the efficacy of surface modified urinary catheters. Theses and Dissertations at Montana State University Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/15149">https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/15149</a> (2019)</li><li>Hamilton, M. A., Buckingham-Meyer, K., Goeres, D. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Checking+the+Validity+of+the+harvesting+and+Disaggregating+Steps+in+Laboratory+Tests+of+Surface+Disinfectants.">Checking the Validity of the harvesting and Disaggregating Steps in Laboratory Tests of Surface Disinfectants.</a> Journal of AOAC International. 92 (6), 1755-1762 (2009).</li><li>Conlon, B. P., Rowe, S. E., Lewis, K., Donelli, G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Persister+Cells+in+Biofilm+Associated+Infections.">Persister Cells in Biofilm Associated Infections.</a> Biofilm-based Healthcare-associated Infections. , (2015).</li><li>ASTM International. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=ASTM+Standard+E2647,+Standard+Test+Method+for+Quantification+of+Pseudomonas+aeruginosa+Biofilm+Grown+Using+Drip+Flow+Biofilm+Reactor+with+Low+Shear+and+Continuous+Flow.">ASTM Standard E2647, Standard Test Method for Quantification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Grown Using Drip Flow Biofilm Reactor with Low Shear and Continuous Flow.</a> ASTM International. , (2020).</li><li>Rosenberg, M., Azevedo, N., Ivask, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Propidium+iodide+staining+underestimates+viability+of+adherent+bacterial+cells.">Propidium iodide staining underestimates viability of adherent bacterial cells.</a> Scientific Reports. , (2019).</li><li>Stiefel, P., Schmidt-Emrich, S., Manuira-Weber, K., Ren, Q. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Critical+aspects+of+using+bacterial+cell+viability+assays+with+the+fluorophores+SYTO9+and+propidium+iodide.">Critical aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9 and propidium iodide.</a> BMC Microbiology. , (2015).</li><li>Kobayashi, N., Bauer, T. W., Tuohy, M. J., Fujishiro, T., Procop, G. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Brief+Ultrasonication+Improves+Detection+of+Biofilm-formative+Bacteria+Around+a+Metal+Implant.">Brief Ultrasonication Improves Detection of Biofilm-formative Bacteria Around a Metal Implant.</a> Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 457, 210-213 (2007).</li><li>Lourenco, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Minimum+information+about+a+biofilm+experiment+(MIABiE),+standards+for+reporting+experiments+and+data+on+sessile+microbial+communities+living+at+interfaces.">Minimum information about a biofilm experiment (MIABiE), standards for reporting experiments and data on sessile microbial communities living at interfaces.</a> Pathogens and Disease. , 1-7 (2014).</li><li>Nascentes, C. C., Korn, M., Sousa, C. S., Arruda, M. A. Z. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Use+of+Ultrasonic+Baths+for+Analytical+Applications:+A+New+Approach+for+Optimisation+Conditions.">Use of Ultrasonic Baths for Analytical Applications: A New Approach for Optimisation Conditions.</a> Journal of Brazilian Chemical Society. 12 (1), 57-63 (2001).</li><li>Elma GmbH &amp; Co. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=KG+TI-H+Ultrasonic+Cleaning+Units:+Operating+Instructions.">KG TI-H Ultrasonic Cleaning Units: Operating Instructions.</a> Elma GmbH &amp; Co. , (2009).</li><li>Stamper, D. M., Holm, E. R., Brizzolara, R. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Exposure+times+and+energy+densities+for+ultrasonic+disinfection+of+Escherichia+coli,+Pseudomonas+aeruginosa,+Enterococcus+avium+and+sewage.">Exposure times and energy densities for ultrasonic disinfection of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus avium and sewage.</a> Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science. 7 (2), 139-146 (2008).</li><li>Suslick, K. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Sonochemistry.">Sonochemistry.</a> Science. 247 (4949), (1990).</li></ol>

Minimum Information for Harvesting and Disaggregation Methods 
To create reproducible biofilm data across the scientific community, it is imperative that authors include as much detail as possible regarding each of the growth, treatment, sampling and analysis steps of a biofilm method. The standardization of biofilm methods has aided in this endeavor as it allows the researcher to reference a specific method and any relevant modifications. However, many papers include only a sentence or two to descr...

The definition of biofilm has evolved over the last few decades and encompasses microbial association with a variety of biological and/or non-biological surfaces, inclusion of noncellular components1 that display differing growth and genetic expression2 within a matrix. Biofilm provides protection from environmental stresses such as drying and may render the action of chemical disinfectants less effective resulting in the survival of microbes. The survivors within a biofilm can potentially provide a source of pathogenic microorganisms that are a public health concern3.
Biofilm methods are comprised of four steps, growth, treatment, sampling (harvesting and disaggregation), and analysis. Growth, the first step, where the user determines the organism growth conditions, temperature, media, etc., is the most considered and reported upon in the biofilm literature4,5,6,7. The treatment step evaluates antimicrobials (e.g., disinfectants) to determine their efficacy either against a mature biofilm3,8,9 or the antimicrobial may be incorporated into the surface to determine the ability of the product to prevent or reduce biofilm growth10. The third step, sampling, includes steps to harvest the biofilm from the surface on which it was growing and to disaggregate the removed clumps3,8,11. The fourth step, analysis, may include viable cell counts, microscopy, fluorescence measurements, molecular outcomes, and/or a matrix component assessment8,9. Assessment of data provides information about the outcome of an experiment. Of the four, sampling is often the most overlooked step because it presumes that the chosen biofilm harvesting and/or disaggregation technique is 100% effective, often without verification11.
Planktonic suspensions of bacteria, often considered to be homogenous, require simple vortexing prior to analysis. Biofilms, however, are complex communities composed of microorganisms (prokaryotic and/or eukaryotic), exopolysaccharides, proteins, lipids, extracellular DNA and host cells12. Steps beyond traditional planktonic microbiological culture methods are needed in order to adequately harvest biofilm from a surface and then disaggregate it into a homogenous single cell suspension. An extensive literature review (information not included in this publication) demonstrated that the choice of the removal and disaggregation technique is dependent on a number of factors, including species present in the biofilm, surface that the biofilm is attached to (non-porous or porous), accessibility to growth surfaces (easily removable coupon or physical destruction of apparatus in which the biofilm is growing), surface geometry (area and shape), density of biofilm on growth surfaces, and available laboratory equipment.
When biofilm is harvested from a surface, the resulting cell suspension is heterogenous. If this nonuniform suspension is to be accurately enumerated, it must be disaggregated into individual cells. Viable plate counts assume that a colony forming unit originates from one bacterium. If aggregates of biofilm are placed on the growth medium, it is impossible to distinguish individual cells which could lead to inaccurate estimates. For example, during disinfectant efficacy testing, if a treatment removes biofilm very effectively from a surface compared to the control, the log reduction could appear artificially large compared to the control. On the other hand, a chemical disinfectant that fixes biofilm onto a surface compared to the control will appear to have a lower log reduction11. This type of scenario could lead to biased interpretation of experimental data.
In preparation for the&#160;publication, a review of the literature determined that common approaches to harvesting and disaggregating biofilm include scraping, swabbing, sonication, vortexing or a combination of these. Scraping is defined as physical removal of biofilm from surfaces with a sterile stick, spatula or other tool. Swabbing refers to removal of biofilm from surfaces with a cotton tipped stick or other fixed absorbent material. Sonication refers to disruption of biofilm from surfaces via ultrasonic waves distributed through water. Vortexing refers to the use of a mixer to achieve a liquid vortex of the sample inside a tube. Homogenization uses rotating blades to shear harvested biofilm clumps into a single cell suspension. In this paper, we present three harvesting and disaggregation methods for two different surface types, hard/non-porous and porous.
A list of recommended minimum information that researchers should include in the methods sections of publications is provided. We hope that inclusion of this information enables other researchers to reproduce their work. There is no perfect harvesting and disaggregation method, therefore, recommendations for how to check the technique are also provided.
Three common methods to harvest and disaggregate biofilm from common growth surfaces are demonstrated in this article. This information will enable researchers to better understand the overall precision and bias of a biofilm test method. Methods described are as follows: (1) A Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm grown on polycarbonate coupons (hard non-porous surface) under high fluid shear in the CDC Biofilm Reactor is harvested and disaggregated following a five step combination of vortexing and sonication to achieve biofilm harvest and disaggregation (2) A P. aeruginosa biofilm grown on borosilicate glass coupons (hard non-porous surface) in the drip flow reactor under low fluid shear is harvested and disaggregated using scraping and homogenization (3) An Escherichia coli biofilm grown in silicone tubing (porous surface) is harvested and disaggregated using scraping, followed by sonication and vortexing.

<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>50 mL conical vials</td>
			<td>Thermo Scientific</td>
			<td>339652</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>100 mL glass beakers</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>FB102100</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>5 mL serological pipettes</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>13-678-12D</td>
			<td>For adding treatment to vials containing coupons.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>50 mL serological pipettes</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>13-678-14C</td>
			<td>For adding neutralizer to vials at the end of treatment contact time.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Applicator sticks</td>
			<td>Puritan</td>
			<td>807</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Hemostats</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>16-100-115</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Metal spatula</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>14-373</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>PTFE policemen</td>
			<td>Saint-Gobain</td>
			<td>06369-04</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>S 10 N - 10 G - ST Dispersing tool</td>
			<td>IKA</td>
			<td>4446700</td>
			<td>For homogenization of biofilm samples.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Scissors</td>
			<td>Fisher Scientific</td>
			<td>08-951-20</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Silicone Foley catheter, size 16 French</td>
			<td>Medline Industries</td>
			<td>DYND11502</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Silicone tubing, size 16</td>
			<td>Cole-Parmer</td>
			<td>EW96400-16</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Splash Guards</td>
			<td>BioSurface Technologies, Inc.</td>
			<td>CBR 2232</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>T 10 basic ULTRA-TURRAX Disperser</td>
			<td>IKA</td>
			<td>3737001</td>
			<td>For homogenization of biofilm samples.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Tubing connectors</td>
			<td>Cole-Parmer</td>
			<td>EW02023-86</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Ultrasonic Cleaner</td>
			<td>Elma</td>
			<td>TI-H15</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Vortex-Genie 2</td>
			<td>Scientific Industries</td>
			<td>SI-0236</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Vortex-Genie 2 Vertical 50 mL Tube Holder</td>
			<td>Scientific Industries</td>
			<td>SI-V506</td>
			<td></td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

harvesting and disaggregation: an overlooked step in biofilm methods research

Biofilm methods consist of four distinct steps: growing the biofilm in a relevant model, treating the mature biofilm, harvesting the biofilm from the surface and disaggregating the clumps, and analyzing the sample. Of the four steps, harvesting and disaggregation are the least studied but nonetheless critical when considering the potential for test bias. This article demonstrates commonly used harvesting and disaggregation techniques for biofilm grown on three different surfaces. The three biofilm harvesting and disaggregation techniques, gleaned from an extensive literature review, include vortexing and sonication, scraping and homogenization, and scraping, vortexing and sonication. Two surface types are considered: hard non-porous (polycarbonate and borosilicate glass) and porous (silicone). Additionally, we provide recommendations for the minimum information that should be included when reporting the harvesting technique followed and an accompanying method to check for bias.

Validation/Confirmation of a Harvesting Method 
Several studies that were conducted in our laboratory examined the ability of vortexing and sonication to effectively harvest biofilm grown in the biofilm reactor (ASTM E2562)2 using the Single Tube Method (ASTM E2871)8.
A P. aeruginosa ATCC 15442 biofilm was grown according to ASTM E25622 on borosilicate glass coupons. After 48 hours, four coup...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Harvesting and Disaggregation: An Overlooked Step in Biofilm Methods Research at JoVE.com

Harvesting and Disaggregation: An Overlooked Step in Biofilm Methods Research

This paper details methods that demonstrate three common biofilm harvesting and disaggregation techniques on two surface types, ruggedness testing of a harvesting method and minimum information to consider when choosing and optimizing harvesting and disaggregation techniques to increase reproducibility.

Biofilm methods consist of four distinct steps: growing the biofilm in a relevant model, treating the mature biofilm, harvesting the biofilm from the ...

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

Harvesting Sperm and Artificial Insemination of Mice

Rodents of the genus Peromyscus (deer mice) are the most prevalent native North American mammals.  Peromyscus species are used in a wide range of research ...

A Step-by-step Method for the Reconstitution of an ABC Transporter into Nanodisc Lipid Particles

The nanodisc is a discoidal particle (~ 10-12 nm large) that trap membrane proteins into a small patch of phospholipid bilayer. The nanodisc is a ...

Basic Caenorhabditis elegans Methods: Synchronization and Observation

Basic Caenorhabditis elegans Methods: Synchronization and Observation

Research into the molecular and developmental biology of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans was begun in the early seventies by Sydney Brenner and it has ...

In Vitro Reconstitution of Light-harvesting Complexes of Plants and Green Algae

In Vitro Reconstitution of Light-harvesting Complexes of Plants and Green Algae

In plants and green algae, light is captured by the light-harvesting complexes (LHCs), a family of integral membrane proteins that coordinate chlorophylls ...

Efficient Mammalian Cell Expression and Single-step Purification of Extracellular Glycoproteins for Crystallization

Production of secreted mammalian proteins for structural and biophysical studies can be challenging, time intensive, and costly. Here described is a time ...

An In Vitro Model to Study the Effect of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-mediated Photodynamic Therapy on Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm

An In Vitro Model to Study the Effect of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-mediated Photodynamic Therapy on Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a common human pathogen, which causes pyogenic and systemic infections. S. aureus infections are difficult to ...

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

The human gut is colonized by trillions of bacteria that support physiologic functions such as food metabolism, energy harvesting, and regulation of the ...

A Step-by-Step Guide to Mosquito Electroantennography

Female mosquitoes are the deadliest animals on earth, claiming the lives of more than 1 million people every year due to pathogens they transmit when ...

A Step-By-Step Method to Detect Neutralizing Antibodies Against AAV using a Colorimetric Cell-Based Assay

Recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAV) have proven to be a safe and successful vector for transferring genetic material to treat various health ...

Assessment of Acinetobacter Biofilm Formation and Characterization of Biofilms

Quantification, Viability Assessment, and Visualization Strategies for Acinetobacter Biofilms

A Comprehensive Protocol for Acinetobacter Biofilm Quantification, Assessment, and Visualization (Video) | JoVE

Acinetobacter causes nosocomial infections and its biofilm formation can contribute to the survival on dry surfaces such as hospital environments. Thus, ...