A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Here, we present a protocol for grade III varicocele surgical treatment that aims to rebuild the venous drainage of the spermatic cord by a spermatic vein-superficial abdominal vein shunt performed under the microscope.
Microsurgical varicocelectomy is the most commonly used method for the treatment of varicocele (VC) in recent years. However, it is technically demanding with the risk of damaging the normal anatomical structure of the spermatic cord, such as the cremaster muscle, testicular artery, and vas deferens during the pampiniform plexus ligation. Also, traditional varicocelectomy hinders the drainage of the stagnant venous blood of the affected testicle, resulting in a persistent scrotal appearance of varicose veins and slower remission of swelling sensation in postoperative patients with grade III VC. Therefore, we developed a retroperitoneal varicocelectomy with a microscopical spermatic venous-superficial vein of the abdominal wall bypass procedure. The spermatic vein was transected and ligated proximally through the retroperitoneal space. Then, the distal spermatic vein was freed and passed through the internal ring; under the skin of the groin, a microscopic vascular anastomosis was performed to build the bypass of the distal spermatic vein and proximal inferior epigastric vein. The high ligation facilitates the protection of the normal anatomy of the spermatic cord, and the venous bypass allows rapid testicular blood drainage, which can effectively improve the degree of varicocele, testicular pain, and even spermatogenic function. In conclusion, the present protocol describes a promising way to reconstruct the spermatic return through high retroperitoneal ligation of the spermatic vein and anastomosis of the spermatic vein-inferior epigastric vein, which resulted in faster and more obvious improvement in symptoms and better prognosis of grade III VC.
The incidence of varicocele (VC) in adult males is 11.7%, and in males with abnormal semen quality, the incidence is up to 25.4%1. Clinical manifestations include symptoms of ipsilateral testicular growth and developmental disorders accompanied by pain, discomfort, low fertility, and hypogonadism. Clinical specialist examinations can detect and grade varicocele2. VC III grade shows positive for clinical palpation and ultrasonic varicocele inner diameter ≥ 3.1 mm and reflux time ≥ 6 s, often accompanied by more severe testicular pain or swelling discomfort3,4.
Recent studies have shown that VC microsurgical varicocelectomy is considered to be the most effective way of VC repair due to its advantages of fewer complications and low recurrence rate5,6,7. However, this procedure has some shortcomings: as in the past, scrotal, inguinal, or subinguinal incisions are often used, which easily damage the cremaster muscle, testicular artery, vas deferens artery and lymphatic vessels. Especially in grade III VC, it is more likely to be accidentally injured due to the many branches of the pampiniform plexus, and damage to the normal anatomical structure of the spermatic cord will cause postoperative complications such as testicular pain, swelling, and atrophy8. Additionally, traditional varicocelectomy by simple ligation of the spermatic vein hinders the drainage of the stagnant venous blood of the affected testicle, resulting in a persistent scrotal appearance of varicose veins and slower remission of swelling sensation in postoperative patients with grade III VC and the relief of testicular pain or swelling discomfort is slow or not obvious, with poor efficacy9. It is conducive to restoring the physiological hemodynamics of the testes by varicocele repair rather than simple varicocelectomy10. For example, microscopic internal spermatic vein-inferior epigastric vein anastomosis has also been reported to be applied to the treatment of varicocele11. Here, we describe a protocol for grade III varicocele surgical treatment that aims to ligate spermatic veins at the high retroperitoneal level and rebuild the venous drainage of the spermatic cord by a spermatic vein-superficial abdominal vein (also known as superficial epigastrin vein or vena epigastrica superficialis) shunt under the microscope.
For this study, a retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 96 patients in the hospital from June 2018 to August 2021 who had grade III VC and complained of testicular pain or distension discomfort, who had received spermatic vein ligation, and who had complete follow-up data. The pain score was assessed by visual scoring (VAS). They were divided into two groups according to the surgical methods: study group A was treated with high ligation of the spermatic vein under a microscope and transfer of spermatic venue-superficial abdominal vein (49 cases), and study group B was treated with low ligation of the spermatic vein under a microscope (47 cases).
This study was approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (NO. 2020-478), prior to the start of the clinical study. All subjects provided informed consent before the study. The inclusion criteria for cases are (1) grade III varicocele confirmed by clinical palpation and ultrasonic examination of varicocele inner diameter ≥ 3.1 mm and reflux time ≥ 6 s; (2) Combined scrotal pain and discomfort; (3) Completed surgical treatment for varicocele in the hospital. Exclusion criteria: (1) any of the following pelvic-related histories: pelvic operation, pelvic radiotherapy, or pelvic trauma; (2) perineal skin disease; or (3) surgical contraindications.
1. High ligation of spermatic veins
2. Releasing the inferior epigastric vein
3. Anastomosis of spermatic vein - inferior epigastric vein
4. Closing the incision
5. Postoperative management
For this study, the 96 patients were divided into two groups: study group A, treated with high ligation of the spermatic vein under a microscope and transfer of spermatic vein-inferior epigastric vein (49 cases), and study group B, treated with low ligation9,12,13,14,15 of the spermatic vein under a microscope (47 cases). The basic data, operation time, hospit...
Increasing evidence has shown that microsurgical varicocelectomy has more advantages than open or laparoscopic varicocelectomy for the surgical management of VC5,6. The surgical microscope can magnify the anatomical details with a clear field of vision, and the arteriovenous, lymphatic vessels and nerves can be discerned more readily. In contrast, it is difficult to distinguish the arteries and veins clearly in other surgical procedures. They may miss venous vess...
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
This research was supported by a grant from the Guangdong Science and Technology Plan project, funded by the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (grant number: 2021A1515410004); Development Research Center of Medicine and Health Science and Technology, National Health Commission (grant number: HDSL202001007).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Clexan (Enoxaparin Sodium Injection) | Sanofi (Beijing) Pharmaceutical Co., LTD | ||
CROWNJUN (Nylon suture) | Kono Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Japan | ||
Doppler ultrasonography | Mindray, Shenzhen, China | Resona R9 | |
Microscope | Zeiss, Jena, Germany | OPMI PENTERO 800 | |
Non-absorbable suture | Johnson, (Shanghai) Medical Equipment Co., LTD | ||
Rivaroxaban | Bayer Healthcare GMBH | ||
VICRYL (absorbable surgical suture) | Johnson, (Shanghai) Medical Equipment Co., LTD |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionExplore More Articles
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved