A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Here, we describe the structure and operating procedures, including microbial containment measures of a facility for "Wilding mice" using blood sampling for immunophenotyping as an example.

Abstract

The use of laboratory mice with a natural microbiome, such as "Wildling mice", offers a promising research tool for both basic and applied science due to their close resemblance to the human superorganism. However, the breeding and maintenance of these mice, which harbor a diverse microbiome including bacteria, viruses, and parasites, pose significant challenges for animal husbandry facilities at research institutions. To address these challenges, a specialized facility concept was developed for housing "Wildling mice" at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. This approach involved designing a facility with specific structural features and operational protocols to effectively contain the natural microbiome, thereby protecting areas with higher hygiene standards.

A methodology for blood sampling from both specified pathogen-free (SPF) and "Wildling mice" for immunophenotyping is demonstrated, highlighting the workflow and biocontainment measures implemented in the facility. Remarkable results reveal that "Wildling mice" exposed to a natural microbiome develop distinct immune cell populations, which are significantly reduced in mice bred and maintained under stringent hygiene conditions.

The significance of this study lies in its potential to provide researchers with access to mice that possess a natural microbiome and a mature immune system similar to that of human adults. This approach could enhance the translatability of preclinical findings into clinical practice, thereby advancing the field of biomedical research.

Introduction

Experimentation in mice is still indispensable in basic and applied science, such as preclinical and toxicological research. However, the standardization of hygiene in laboratory environments, aimed at reducing biological noise and minimizing variability in experimental results, has led to the exclusion of natural microbiota to a large extent. Thus, the conditions under which hygienically standardized, specified pathogen-free (SPF) laboratory mice are born and kept differ from the real-world conditions to which humans and animals are normally exposed. This mismatch between laboratory conditions and the natural environments in which human diseases occur gives rise to the "standardization fallacy": assuming that minimizing variation in experimental conditions improves translational outcomes. However, in reality, it limits the biological relevance of findings1,2. For example, research has shown that the absence of microbial and environmental diversity in SPF mice can result in an underdeveloped immune system, undermining the validity of immunological and preclinical studies3.

Several approaches have been proposed to address biological variation in mouse models, each with its own advantages and limitations, including co-housing with feral and pet shop mice3,4,5,6,7,8, sequential exposure to commensals9, keeping the animals in outdoor enclosures10 or on bedding from large animals11, and fecal transplants from wild mice12. A promising new mouse model for preclinical and toxicological research is the "Wildling mice" model, which consists of standard laboratory mouse strains harboring a natural microbiome13. These "Wildling mice" are generated by transplanting embryos from laboratory mouse strains into wild-caught mice. During birth, the laboratory mouse strains acquire the natural microbiome of their surrogate mothers, mimicking the natural inoculation that occurs during human delivery13. "Wildling mice" can be bred like any other laboratory mouse strain, with their natural microbiome preserved across generations.

"Wildling mice" host a diverse microbiota - including bacteria, viruses, and parasites - that are typically excluded from SPF mouse facilities. Consequently, maintaining a natural microbiome in research facilities presents challenges, as these microbes must be contained without compromising the overall SPF hygiene standards.

At Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, a dedicated facility for "Wildling mice" was established, separated from the SPF areas by strict biocontainment measures. The facility includes breeding and experimentation rooms, ensuring that the natural microbiome of "Wildling mice" is maintained while SPF areas are protected (Figure 1).

The founder pairs of Charité's colony were imported from the "Wilding mice" colony established at the Department of Microbiome Research, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany. They are supplied with a health certificate and monitored with an extended panel for zoonotic pathogens before the import of the colony founders. Sentinels will be used to monitor the microbiome over time. Both SPF and "Wildling mice" are housed under the same conditions. The mice are bred and kept preferentially in individually ventilated cages (IVC) type II long in groups of five mice. The temperature inside the facility is 22 °C, and the light/dark cycle is 12 h. The mice receive standard grain-based chow and tap water. Sterilization of bedding and enrichment items is unnecessary for "Wildling mice". However, autoclaving these items prevents mix-ups of materials in areas where SPF mice are housed.

In this protocol, the immunophenotyping procedures for both SPF and "Wildling mice" are demonstrated, highlighting the stringent microbial containment protocols at the "Wildling mouse" facility. These measures ensure the integrity of SPF environments while providing the benefits of working with mice carrying a natural microbiome.

figure-introduction-4800
Figure 1: Layout of the facility for Wildling mice. E1 = access to the facility. Arrows indicate the entry route into the facility. E2 = access to the laminar airflow cabin from outside the facility. PA = personnel airlock with air shower. AS = air shower. R1, R2 = rooms for Wildling mice breeding. R3 = room for keeping Wilding mice. R4 = room for keeping SPF mice. PR1 = procedure room for SPF mice. PR2 = procedure room for Wildling mice. SB = sterile working bench. EE = emergency exits. CR = changing room in front of LAF cabin. LAF = laminar airflow cabin for interventions under protective airflow. A = autoclave. ER = equipment room. Green arrows represent routes accessible when working with SPF animals, and yellow arrows indicate paths available for working with Wildling mice after air showering. Blue arrows indicate access for husbandry staff only. The red line marks the glass wall inside the LAF cabin, which divides the space into two sections that can either be accessed from E1 via PR2 or from E2 via CR. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Protocol

The facility for "Wilding mice" and procedures involving living animals were approved by the responsible state office for animal experimentation, "Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales Berlin" (LAGeSo). The most important steps of the protocol are summarized in Figure 2.

1. Getting access to the Wilding facility

  1. Get a personal introduction to the operating and biocontainment procedures of the facility from the responsible animal welfare officer.
  2. Get the transponder key to enter the facility for "Wildling mice" and book the procedure rooms via the online booking system.

2. Entering the facility for "Wildling mice"

  1. Deposit the clothes in the changing room.
  2. Change into area clothing: pants, kasak, and disposable shoe covers (Figure 3).

3. Sampling blood from SPF mice in the SPF area

  1. Transfer the SPF mice (male and female, 8-20 weeks) from the room where they are kept (R4) to the procedure room for SPF animals (PR1) in a closed IVC cage.
  2. Switch on the laminar flow bench and disinfect the workspace surface with 70% Vol. ethanol. Work inside the bench.
  3. Inspect capillary tubes for broken or chipped sections to avoid increased risk of breakage or harm.
  4. Under brief general anesthesia with isoflurane (induction at 5% isoflurane in oxygen-enriched medical air, followed by 1.5%-2.0% for maintenance), after loss of pedal withdrawal reflex (as indicated via toe pinch), compress the neck veins of the mice by gripping the scruff of the neck.
  5. Using one hand, secure the animal's head using the thumb and forefinger. Insert a fresh capillary into the medial canthus of the eye under the nictitating membrane at a 45° angle. Ensure that the capillary is positioned between the eyeball and the bony orbit of the eye.
    NOTE: To avoid trauma, do not let the tip of the capillary tube touch the surface of the eye.
  6. Insert the capillary through the sinus membrane with a gentle axial rotating motion. Continue rotating the tube at the back of the orbit until blood flows. Collect a minimum 15 µL of blood in a blood collection tube containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)(approximately 1 drop).
  7. Before removing the capillary, loosen the grip on the scruff of the neck to keep bleeding into the tissue to a minimum. To ensure good hemostasis, use a clean gauze pad or swab to stop the bleeding.
  8. Slightly swivel the tube to mix blood and EDTA. Do not shake the tube. Store the blood sample on ice.
  9. Disinfect the working surface and switch off the laminar flow bench. Return SPF mice in a closed IVC to the SPF housing room (R4).

4. Entering the area for "Wildling mice"

  1. Remove shoes and socks in the anteroom of the air shower (PA). Put on area socks and full-body personal protective equipment (PPE) consisting of Tyvek overall, hair net, if necessary, cotton gloves, nitrile gloves, and facemasks (Figure 3).
  2. Enter the air shower in socks via the adhesive floor covering. While air showering, raise the arms and perform a 360° turn.
  3. Exit the air shower and put on area shoes on the other side.

5. Sampling blood from "Wilding mice"

  1. Transfer "Wildling mice" (male and female, 8 - 20 weeks) from the room where they are kept (R3) in a closed IVC cage to the procedure room (PR2).
  2. Switch on the laminar flow bench and disinfect the workspace surface.
  3. Follow the procedures described for sampling SPF mice in section 3, steps 2-8.
  4. After completing blood sampling, change gloves. Disinfect all materials and surfaces. Switch off the laminar flow bench.

6. Exporting blood samples from the "Wildling mice" area via the laminar airflow (LAF) cabinet

NOTE: The procedure room (PR2) contains a LAF cabinet, which serves as a material lock and sterile intervention room. Samples are transferred out via the LAF cabin. The interior is accessible from both inside (via E1 and PR2) and outside (via E2 and CR) the Wildling area and is divided in the middle by a glass wall with a sliding door (Figure 1). Two people are required to export materials: Person 1 (inside of the Wildling area [via PR2]) will perform steps 6.1 and 6.2. Person 2 (outside of the Wildling area [via E2]) will perform steps 6.3-6.5.

  1. Disinfect sample containers. Remove sample containers via the sliding door in the glass wall of the LAF cabin.
  2. After the transfer of sample containers to person 2 is completed, receive protective clothing from person 2 (wears protective clothing in the smock lock of the cabin) on the other side of the LAF cabin and dispose of it. Disinfect all surfaces.
  3. Put on protective clothing in the access LAF in front of the LAF cabin (CR, Figure 1).
  4. Receive disinfected sample containers from the Wildling area without contact through the sliding door in the glass wall of the LAF cabin.
  5. Remove protective clothing and pass it through the sliding door into the interior area of the LAF cabin for disposal.

7. Exiting the facility for "Wildling mice"

  1. Leave disposable overalls and area shoes inside the area. Dispose of hair net, rubber gloves, and facemask.
    NOTE: Shoes and overalls can be reused.
  2. Enter the air shower immediately in area socks. Raise arms and perform a 360° turn while air showering.
  3. Leave the air shower and place area socks in the laundry collector. Put on the socks and shoes and disposable shoe covers. Deposit area clothing in the changing room in the laundry collector. Change into the clothes in the changing room

8. Processing and analyzing blood samples

  1. Bring blood samples to the laboratory.
    1. Prepare fluorophore-conjugated antibody staining cocktail: For each sample, add 0.25 µL of Alexa Fluor 700 anti-mouse CD45, 0.25 µL of Brilliant Violet 605 anti-mouse TCR-β chain, 0.25 µL of APC anti-mouse CD4, 0.25 µL of Brilliant Violet 785 anti-mouse CD8, 0.25 µL of FITC anti-mouse CD44 and 0.25 µL of PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse CD62L antibody to 50 µL of flow cytometry buffer (phosphate-buffered saline, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1% Bovine Serum Albumin, 4 °C). Keep in the dark on ice until step 8.8.
      NOTE: The fluorophores used can be adapted to the configuration of the flow cytometer that will be used for sample acquisition.
  2. Disinfect blood collection tubes. Add 2 mL of ice-cold flow cytometry buffer to a 5 mL round-bottom polystyrene tube. Place the tube on ice.
  3. Open blood collection tube. Add 10 µL blood to the tube containing the flow cytometry buffer and pulse vortex.
  4. Spin down at 400 x g for 5 min at 4 °C.
  5. Aspirate the supernatant. Add 1 mL of red blood cell (RBC) lysis buffer, pulse vortex, and incubate for 3 min at room temperature (RT).
  6. Add 100 µL of 10x PBS. Spin down at 400 x g for 5 min at 4 °C.
  7. Repeat steps 8.5-8.6.
  8. Aspirate the supernatant. Add 50 µL of antibody staining cocktail, vortex, and incubate for 20 min on ice in the dark.
  9. Add 1 mL of flow cytometry buffer. Spin down at 400 x g for 5 min at 4 °C.
  10. Aspirate the supernatant. Add 180 µL of flow cytometry buffer.
  11. Add 20 µL of SYTOX Blue Dead Cell Stain (final concentration 1:1000) for live/dead discrimination.
  12. Acquire samples on a flow cytometer and analyze the data using the flow cytometer acquisition software or flow cytometry data analysis program.

Results

"Wilding mice" potentially harbor microorganisms typically excluded from SPF facilities, which poses a challenge to animal husbandry practices within research institutions that uphold stringent hygiene standards. Over the past 4 years, scientists and veterinarians at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the German Centre for Protection of Laboratory Animals (Bf3R) have developed a facility dedicated to mice with a natural microbiome, incorporating stringent biocontainment measures through a collabor...

Discussion

Mice with a natural microbiome are a promising research tool for basic and applied science because of their closer resemblance to the human superorganism3,9,10,11,12. Attempts to incorporate biological complexity into mouse models have led to the development of various approaches, each with its own advantages and limitations3,

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Charité 3R| Replace - Reduce - Refine. S.P.R. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) Emmy Noether-Programm RO 6247/1-1 (project ID 446316360), the DFG SFB1160 IMPATH (project ID 256073931), and the TRR 359 PILOT (project ID 491676693). S.J. was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) JO 1216/2-1 and the German Multiple Sclerosis Society (DMSG e.V.).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Alexa Fluor 700 anti-mouse CD45 antibodyBioLegend103127Clone 30F-11
Animal ChowAltromin1324
APC anti-mouse CD4 antibodyBioLegend100515Clone RM4-5
Blood collection tubeGreiner450475MiniCollect K3E, K3EDTA
Bovine Serum AlbuminSigma-AldrichA9647-100G
Brilliant Violet 605 anti-mouse TCR-beta chain antibodyBioLegend109241Clone H57-597
Brilliant Violet 785 anti-mouse CD8 antibodyBioLegend100749Clone 53-6.7
CapillaryHirschmann9000210Hirschmann minicaps, Na-hep
EDTACorning46-034-CI
FITC anti-mouse CD44 antibodyBioLegend103021Clone IM7
PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-mouse CD62L antibodyBioLegend104431Clone MEL-14
Phosphate-buffered Saline (10x)Gibco12579099
Phosphate-buffered Saline (1x)Gibco14190094
RBC lysing bufferBioLegend420302
Round Bottom Polystyrene TubeSarstedt55.476.005
SYTOX Blue Dead Cell StainInvitrogenS34852
Tyvek overall (DuPont)Fisher Scientific11371633

References

  1. Voelkl, B., Wurbel, H., Krzywinski, M., Altman, N. The standardization fallacy. Nat Methods. 18 (1), 5-7 (2021).
  2. Voelkl, B., et al. Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 21 (7), 384-393 (2020).
  3. Beura, L. K., et al. Normalizing the environment recapitulates adult human immune traits in laboratory mice. Nature. 532 (7600), 512-516 (2016).
  4. Caruso, R., Ono, M., Bunker, M. E., Nunez, G., Inohara, N. Dynamic and asymmetric changes of the microbial communities after cohousing in laboratory mice. Cell Rep. 27 (11), 3401-3412.e3 (2019).
  5. Labuda, J. C., Fong, K. D., Mcsorley, S. J. Cohousing with dirty mice increases the frequency of memory T cells and has variable effects on intracellular bacterial infection. Immunohorizons. 6 (2), 184-190 (2022).
  6. Martin, M. D., et al. Cd115(+) monocytes protect microbially experienced mice against e. Coli-induced sepsis. Cell Rep. 42 (11), 113345 (2023).
  7. Burger, S., et al. Natural microbial exposure from the earliest natural time point enhances immune development by expanding immune cell progenitors and mature immune cells. J Immunol. 210 (11), 1740-1751 (2023).
  8. Tabilas, C., et al. Early microbial exposure shapes adult immunity by altering cd8+ t cell development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 119 (49), e2212548119 (2022).
  9. Reese, T. A., et al. Sequential infection with common pathogens promotes human-like immune gene expression and altered vaccine response. Cell Host Microbe. 19 (5), 713-719 (2016).
  10. Leung, J. M., et al. Rapid environmental effects on gut nematode susceptibility in rewilded mice. PLoS Biol. 16 (3), e2004108 (2018).
  11. Sbierski-Kind, J., et al. Distinct housing conditions reveal a major impact of adaptive immunity on the course of obesity-induced type 2 diabetes. Front Immunol. 9, 1069 (2018).
  12. Rosshart, S. P., et al. Wild mouse gut microbiota promotes host fitness and improves disease resistance. Cell. 171 (5), 1015-1028.e13 (2017).
  13. Rosshart, S. P., et al. Laboratory mice born to wild mice have natural microbiota and model human immune responses. Science. 365 (6452), eaaw4361 (2019).
  14. Dirnagl, U., Kurreck, C., Castanos-Velez, E., Bernard, R. Quality management for academic laboratories: Burden or boon? Professional quality management could be very beneficial for academic research but needs to overcome specific caveats. EMBO Rep. 19 (11), e47143 (2018).
  15. . Premier Available from: https://premier-qms.org/ (2024)

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Laboratory MiceNatural MicrobiomeWildling MiceImmunophenotypingAnimal HusbandryBiocontainment ProceduresResearch FacilityHygiene StandardsImmune Cell PopulationsPreclinical FindingsBiomedical ResearchCharit Universit tsmedizin Berlin

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved