A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
We present a technique for inserting a lumbar spinal catheter at the L4-L5 level in a 3-month-old Danish Landrace pig as part of a terminal research protocol, enabling continuous infusion or CSF sampling from the thecal sac.
Pigs are increasingly used as a large animal model for pharmacologic CNS research due to the anatomical and physiological similarities between the porcine and human central nervous systems (CNS). However, accessing the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in larger pig breeds by conventional lumbar puncture techniques can be challenging due to an oblique orientation of the spinal spinous processes and a limited interlaminar space. Accordingly, an open surgical procedure for inserting a lumbar spinal catheter for continuous CSF sampling at the L4/L5 level in pigs is thoroughly described in this work. After positioning the pig and identifying the anatomical landmarks, a dorsal midline surgical incision is made to expose the spinous processes. By advancing the introducer needle, the spinal catheter is inserted inside the thecal sac of the spinal canal while leaving the bone structures of the spine intact. This method allows continuous infusion into or sampling from the porcine thecal sac with minimal bleeding or CSF leakage. The procedure is simple, time-efficient, and reproducible across different experimental setups, offering significant potential for various pre-clinical studies, including pharmacokinetic research, surgical training, and spinal cord injury models.
Animal models are essential when ethical or practical limitations prevent the use of human subjects to investigate diseases or test surgical methods. While rodents are commonly used due to their low cost, their translational relevance is limited by significant differences from humans1. Pigs, however, offer several advantages compared to rodents, including anatomical and physiological similarities to humans - especially in the context of CNS research1,2. Canine models have historically served as experimental models for CNS research, but ethical considerations have constrained the use of dogs in recent years3. Furthermore, the comparable size of porcine organs to human enhances their use in surgical research and procedural training4. The porcine CNS and spine closely mirror that of humans, with similarities in brain and spinal cord architecture and functionality1,5,6. Importantly, the dimensions of the vertebral column and spinal canal in pigs make them suitable for various pre-clinical studies7,8, including surgical procedural training9,10, drug penetration11,12,13, and spinal cord injuries14.
Access to the CSF in porcine models is crucial in many experimental setups. While lumbar puncture provides a method for singular CSF sampling or intrathecal drug administration, repeated lumbar punctures are impractical. They pose a potential risk of intraspinal hematomas, nerve damage, and CSF contamination with blood. In human patients, spinal microcatheters are commonly used for continuous lumbar CSF drainage in aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhages and should, due to size similarities, be equally suited for continuous CSF sampling in pigs. However, species-specific anatomical differences in pigs present unique challenges for CSF access. For example, the presence of overlapping laminae, ossified ligaments, and abundant epidural adipose tissue makes conventional percutaneous lumbar puncture techniques less reliable15. In GΓΆttingen minipigs, a minimally invasive percutaneous method has been employed, which enables serial CSF sampling16. This method relies upon manual identification of the lumbar intervertebral spaces, and the catheterization itself is performed without visualization of the introducer. However, this technique is less suitable for larger pigs, as anatomical variations in vertebral size, spinous processes, and the amount of epidural adipose tissue make percutaneous catheterization more difficult15. Therefore, more invasive methods involving exposure of the spine may be required in larger porcine models to ensure reliable catheter placement.
The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the surgical procedure for inserting a spinal catheter into the porcine thecal sac at the L4/L5 level. The procedure involves positioning the subject, planning the surgical incision based on anatomical landmarks, and accessing the posterior bone structures of the spine prior to catheterization.
Subjects were housed in compliance with local regulations under the approval of the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate (license no. 2020-15-0201-00401). Subject information: Domestic swine, female, approximately 40 kg, 3 months of age.
1. Subject housing and preoperative fasting
2. Anesthesia and monitoring
3. Animal positioning
4. Preparation of surgical equipment
5. Identifying key anatomical landmarks
6. Exposing the spinous processes
7. Access to the thecal sac
8. Insertion of catheter into the thecal sac
9. Administration of lipopolysaccharide
10. CSF sampling
11. Euthanasia
The prone positioning of the pig optimizes surgical access to the lumbar vertebrae. The use of supportive sandbags increases the angulation between adjacent lumbar spinous processes, thereby improving access to the spinal canal.
The present study aimed to investigate the inflammatory response within the CSF compartment following intraventricular inoculation with E. coli lipopolysaccharide. A total of 10 pigs underwent the procedure, and subsequent CSF analyses revealed an increase in ...
The demonstrated procedure for lumbar catheter insertion for continuous CSF sampling in pigs involves several crucial steps. Firstly, the correct vertebral level must be exposed to ensure optimal conditions for successful catheterization. The porcine spinal cord extends further caudally compared to humans, reaching the S2-S3 level15, in contrast to the human conus medullaris, which terminates at the L1-L2 level20. Consequently, accessing the lumbar cistern for CSF sampling ...
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
The authors would like to express our sincere gratitude for the experience shared by the personnel at the Biomedical Laboratory, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Adjustable operating tableΒ | N/A | N/A | |
Bair Hugger heater | 3MΒ | B5005241003 | |
Bair Hugger heating blanket | 3M | B5005241003 | |
Endotracheal tube size 6.5 | DVMed | DVM-107860 | Cuffed endotracheal tubeΒ |
Euthasol VetΒ | Dechra Veterinary Products A/S | 380019 | phentobarbital for euthanazia, 400mg/mLΒ |
Foley Catheter 12FΒ | Becton, Dickinson and Company | D175812E | Catheter with in-built thermosensorΒ |
Intravenous peripheral catheter | AvantorΒ | BDAM381344 | Size G18 |
Intravenous sheathΒ | Coris Avanti | Avanti Cordis Femoral Sheath 6F | |
Monopolar, ForceTriad System | Medtronic | ||
Plastic Syringe, 2 mLΒ | Becton, Dickinson and Company | 300928 | |
Primus respiratorΒ | DrΓ€gerΒ | Respirator with in-built vaporiser for supplementary Sevofluran anesthisaΒ | |
Self-retaining retractor | World Precission Instruments | 501722 | Weitlander retractor, self-retaining, 14 cm bluntΒ |
Silicone Lumbar Catheter incl. Introducer | Integra | NL8508330 | |
Sterile SalineΒ | Fresnius Kabi | 805541 | 1000 mLΒ |
Sterile surgical swaps | |||
Surgical scalpel no 24 | Swann Morton | 5.03396E+12 | Swann Morton Sterile Disposable Scalpel No. 24 |
Zoletil VetΒ | Virbac | Medical mixture for induction of anesthesia |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright Β© 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved