A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This work details robust basic routines on how to prepare isotope-labeled membrane protein samples and analyze them at high-resolution with modern solid-state NMR spectroscopy methods.

Abstract

Membrane proteins are vital for cell function and thus represent important drug targets. Solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (ssNMR) spectroscopy offers a unique access to probe the structure and dynamics of such proteins in biological membranes of increasing complexity. Here, we present modern solid-state NMR spectroscopy as a tool to study structure and dynamics of proteins in natural lipid membranes and at atomic scale. Such spectroscopic studies profit from the use of high-sensitivity ssNMR methods, i.e., proton-(1H)-detected ssNMR and DNP (Dynamic Nuclear Polarization) supported ssNMR. Using bacterial outer membrane beta-barrel protein BamA and the ion channel KcsA, we present methods to prepare isotope-labeled membrane proteins and to derive structural and motional information by ssNMR.

Introduction

Structural and motional studies of membrane proteins in physiologically relevant environments pose a challenge to traditional structural biology techniques1. Modern solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (ssNMR) methods offer a unique approach for the characterization of membrane proteins2,3,4,5,6,7 and has long been used to study membrane proteins, including membrane embedded protein pumps8, channels9,10,11, or receptors12,13,14,15. Technical advances such as ultra-high magnetic fields >1,000 MHz, fast magic angle spinning frequencies >100 kHz, and hyperpolarization techniques16 have established ssNMR as a powerful method for the study of membrane proteins in environments of ever-increasing complexity from liposomes to cell membranes and even whole cells. For example, DNP has become a powerful tool for such experiments (see reference17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25). More recently, 1H-detected ssNMR offers increasing possibilities to study membrane proteins at high spectral resolution and sensitivity25,26,27,28,29. This work highlights two bacterial membrane proteins that are involved in essential functions, i.e., protein insertion and ion transport. The corresponding proteins, BamA25,30,31,32,33 and KcsA23,27,28,34,35,36,37,38,39 (or chimeric variants thereof10,40) have been examined by ssNMR methods for more than a decade.

A representative protocol for the preparation and ssNMR characterization of bacterially originating membrane proteins is presented here. The different steps of the protocol are shown in Figure 1. First, the expression, isotope-labeling, purification, and membrane-reconstitution of BamA is explained. Then, a general workflow for the characterization of the membrane protein by ssNMR is presented; specifically, the assignment of membrane protein backbones using 1H-detected ssNMR at fast magic angle spinning. Finally, basic setup and acquisition of dynamic nuclear polarization-(DNP)-supported experiments, which significantly boost ssNMR signal sensitivity, are detailed.

Protocol

1. Production of uniformly labeled 2H, 13C, 15N-labeled BamA-P4P5

NOTE: While this protocol requires working with non-pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria, adherence to basic biological safety procedures is a must, namely, wearing safety glasses, lab coats, gloves, and following institutional standard operating procedures for work with microorganisms.

  1. Use a single colony of E. coli BL 21 Star (DE3) containing the pET11aΞ”ssYaeT plasmid encoding for E. coli BamA-P4P5 to inoculate 50 mL of Lysogeny broth supplemented with 50 Β΅g/L of ampicillin.
  2. Grow the culture at 37 Β°C at 200 rpm until an OD600 of 0.6 is reached. Spin at 2,000 x g for 10 min. Resuspend the pellet in 50 mL of M9 (see Table 1) to a maximum OD600 of 0.1.
    NOTE: All future growing steps take place at the conditions stated above unless otherwise noted.
  3. Grow the culture until OD600 of 0.5. Spin at 2,000 x g for 10 min at room temperature. Resuspend the pellet in 50 mL of M9 containing 90% D2O (see Table 1 for recipe) to a maximum OD600 of 0.1. Grow the culture overnight at 30 Β°C at 200 rpm.
  4. Spin down the culture at 2,000 x g for 10 min at room temperature. Resuspend the pellet in the prewarmed 50 mL 90% D2O M9 to a maximum OD600 of 0.1. Grow until an OD600 of 1.0 is reached.
  5. Spin down the culture at 2,000 x g for 10 min at room temperature. Prepare 100 mL of 100% D2O M9 medium with isotope-enriched amounts of non-enriched glucose and ammonium chloride. Resuspend in 100% D2O M9 medium to a maximum OD600 of 0.1. Grow until an OD600 of 0.7 is reached.
  6. Spin down the culture at 2,000 x g for 10 min at room temperature. Discard the supernatant and resuspend the pellet in 500 mL of 100% D2O M9 medium with isotopes (see Table 1) to a maximum OD600 of 0.1.
  7. Allow the culture to grow until an OD600 of 0.6-0.9 is reached. Induce with 1 mM of isopropyl Ξ²-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Express for 4 h and harvest cells at 4,000 x g for 15 min at room temperature.

2. Purification, refolding, and BamA-P4P5 proteo-liposome formation

NOTE: All the steps of this section should be conducted in a fume hood. Special care must be taken when opening tubes post-centrifugation limits harmful aerosols.

  1. Thaw the pellet on ice. Resuspend the pellet in 20 mL of cold Buffer 1. See Table 2 for the Buffers.
  2. Spin down the solution at 4,000 x g for 20 min at 4 Β°C. Resuspend the pellet in 20 mL of cold distilled H2O. Allow the suspension to incubate on ice for 10 min.
  3. Spin down the suspension at 4,000 x g for 20 min at 4 Β°C. Resuspend in 10 mL cold Buffer 2 and allow to incubate on ice for 30 min.
  4. Supplement the mixture with an additional 10 mL of cold buffer 2 and incubate for a further 30 min on ice. Add 0.5% n-Dodecyl-B-D-Maltoside (DDM) and swirl gently.
  5. Sonicate the sample on ice at 13 kHz until vicious-use 10 s long on/off pulses. Spin down at 25,000 x g for 20 min at 4 °C. Wash three times with 20 mL of Buffer 3. Centrifuge at 25,000 x g for 20 min at 4 ˚C.
  6. Resuspend the pellet in 20 mL of Buffer 4. Incubate at 37 Β°C for 30 min. Sonicate the sample on ice at 13 kHz, until clear-use 10 s long on/off pulses.
  7. Spin down the sample at 25,000 x g for 20 min at 4 Β°C. Repeat steps 2.4 to 2.6 omitting addition of protease inhibitor and incubation at 37 Β°C.
  8. Wash the pellet with 20 mL of water and twice with Buffer 3. Spin down at 25,000 x g for 20 min at 4 Β°C. Aliquot the suspension into 1 mL microcentrifuge tubes and spin the microcentrifuge tubes at maximum speed on a bench-top centrifuge for 20 min. Inclusion body purity is assessed by 10% SDS-Page gel, see Figure 2A. Expected yield for purified BamA-P4P5 triply (2H,13C,15N) labeled is 30 mg/L.
  9. Solubilize inclusion bodies in 200 Β΅L of Buffer 5 and 300 Β΅L of H2O. Add 6M guanidium chloride (GdnCl). Adjust the volume of microcentrifuge tube to 1 mL with H2O. Vortex the mixture and incubate for 4 h at room temperature. Vortex the microcentrifuge tubes periodically (every 30 min).
  10. Spin at 100,000 x g for 1 h at 4 Β°C. Use Beer-Lambert's Law to determine protein concentration by 280 nm. The molar extinction coefficient is 117,120 M-1cm-1. If concentration is >100 Β΅M dilute with 1x Buffer 5 with 6 M GdnCl. Rapidly dilute the protein 10x in Buffer 6. Incubate the mixture overnight at room temperature.
    ​NOTE: For ultracentrifugation, use ultracentrifugation grade 1.5 mL tubes.
  11. Determine refolding efficiency using a semi-native SDS-Page gel. Take two 10 Β΅L aliquots from step 2.10 and add 10 Β΅L of Lameili buffer (buffer 8) to each aliquot. Boil one sample for 10 min at 95 Β°C; leave the other aliquot on ice. Afterwards, run both samples at 14 mA on a 10% SDS-Page gel. The stacking and running portions of the gels lack reducing agent and SDS. Protein staining is achieved using Coomassie dye. The expected results are shown in Figure 2B.
  12. Spin down the sample at 4,000 x g for 20 min at 4 Β°C. Concentrate the sample to a working volume of 8 mL using a 30 kDa centrifugal filter. Spin the sample at 4,000 x g for 20 min at 4 Β°C. Measure protein absorbance at 280 nm. As in step 2.10, determine the protein concentration.
  13. Calculate the amount of lipid required for a 10:1 lipid to protein ratio (LPR-mol/mol). From a chloroform stock, add the required amount of lipids, as calculated in step 2.12, into a 100 mL round bottom flask (RBF). Evacuate the chloroform from the RBF under a gentle stream of nitrogen. Place RBF on high vacuum for 3 h. Hydrate the lipid film with 1 mL of Buffer 7. Incubate RBF for 10 min at 37 Β°C.
  14. Add the protein mixture (from step 2.12) to the RBF.
  15. Dilute the protein/lipid mixture (from step 2.14) to the final volume of 50 mL in the RBF. Use Buffer 7 supplemented with 1x protease inhibitor dissolved in DMSO and incubate for 30 min at 37 Β°C.
  16. Dialyze against 100 volumes of Buffer 7 for 2 weeks (use 12-14 kDa molecular weight cut-off dialysis tubing). For the first 24 h, perform the dialysis at room temperature with addition of fresh Buffer 7 every 8 hrs. Afterwards, change the buffer once daily, and perform dialysis at 4 Β°C.

3. Filling of the ssNMR rotor

  1. After step 2.16, centrifuge for 30-60 min at 10,000 x g at 4 Β°C so that a pellet is formed. Remove the supernatant with a pipette.
    NOTE: The technique discussed below has been optimized for a 3.2 mm rotor but is applicable for almost any rotor diameter.
  2. Pipette the sample into the rotor and gently spin the same down with a table centrifuge.
    NOTE: Depending on sample consistency, one may either use a densification tool to compact the sample, or a spatula instead of a pipette to put the sample into the rotor.
  3. Repeat this process 2-3x until the rotor is filled to the correct height and check if there is enough space for the cap left, as indicated by the marker line on the densification tool. Close the rotor with the cap positioning tool on an even surface. Mark half the bottom edge of the rotor.
    NOTE: New ssNMR rotor generations come with a durable laser mark at the bottom edge for the optical detection of the rotor spinning frequency. Otherwise, the use of a sharpie pen is suggested; as the MAS detector has been optimized specifically for sharpie ink.
  4. Use a magnifying glass to check whether the cap is well placed.

4. Sample characterization by 2D 13C- 13C ssNMR spectroscopy

  1. Insert the rotor into the magnet, using the automatic spinning routine of the MAS unit, spin the sample up to the desired MAS frequency between 10 and 20 kHz MAS while cooling the sample to 270 K set temperature. Tune and match the 1H and 13C channels.
    NOTE: For the choice of the MAS frequency, avoid accidentally matching the chemical shift distance between the spectral CΞ± region and the Carbonyl carbon region to the spinning frequency, i.e., avoid the first order rotational resonance condition41.
  2. Optimize a 1H-13C cross-polarization42 (CP) experiment by varying the rf power on the proton channel from 25-80 kHz. Typical parameters are 45 kHz rf power on 13C, 80-100 kHz heteronuclear 1H-decoupling43 during acquisition, 1.8-2.0 s recycle delay, and 64 scans.
    1. Optimize the CP contact time for maximal signal sensitivity on the aliphatic carbons.
    2. Determine 1H 90Β° pulse length in the 13C-CP experiment by multiplying the starting pulse by four, i.e., by optimizing a 360Β° pulse, and vary the length until the signal has disappeared. Include a rectangular pulse directly after the CP transfer and optimize the 13C 90Β° pulse length analogously.
  3. Run a 2D 13C-13C proton-driven spin diffusion (PDSD)-type experiment such as PARIS with 30 ms magnetization transfer time to detect intra-residual correlations and gauge the sample quality. Transfer the power-levels, the contact time, and 90Β° pulse lengths from the previously optimized 13C-CP experiment. Use an acquisition time of 4-6 ms in the indirect dimension. Process the spectrum with squared sin bell functions (QSIN) or, for insensitive samples, exponential line broadening in both dimensions.
  4. Extract slices of isolated cross-peaks and determine the linewidth at half heights. A linewidth between ~0.3-1.0 13C ppm is indicative of a well-ordered sample, ideal for ssNMR characterization, whereas a linewidth above 1.0 13C ppm is indicative of conformational heterogeneity that may compromise ssNMR characterization. The 2D CC PARIS spectrum of BamA shown in Figure 3A is an example of a well-ordered protein that gives high-quality spectra.

5. Backbone assignment by 1H-detected 3D ssNMR spectroscopy

  1. Acquisition of 2D NH spectral fingerprints
    1. Fill the sample in a 1.3 mm rotor, as described above. Insert the rotor into the magnet, spin the sample to 10-20 kHz MAS and cool the sample to 240-250 K set temperature or lower, depending on the specifications of the ssNMR probehead. Use the MAS unit interface to increase the MAS frequency gradually in steps of 5 kHz to 60 kHz MAS.
    2. Optimize the CP amplitudes, contact times, and 90Β° pulse lengths in 13C- and 15N CP experiments. Use amplitudes around 30-50 or 70-100 kHz on the heteronuclear channels and vary the amplitude on the 1H-channel from 80-180 kHz. Use a recycling delay of 0.7-1.2 s, along with 15 kHz low-power heteronuclear proton decoupling44. Also, see reference45 for further practical details on how to set up CP ssNMR experiments.
    3. Acquire a 2D NH experiment to gauge the 1H-resolution. Transfer the 15N-CP parameters and use approximately 15 and 25 ms acquisition time in the direct and indirect dimensions. For the first 1H to 15N CP transfer, use the previously optimized contact time. For the 15N to 1H backtransfer, use 0.7-1.0 ms contact time to minimize interresidual magnetization transfer.
    4. Use 50-250 ms water MISSISSIPPI suppression46, dependent on sample water content. Process the spectrum with squared sin bell functions (QSIN) in both dimensions. Extract slices of isolated cross-peaks and determine the linewidth at half heights. An example for a high-quality 2D NH spectrum25 is shown for membrane-embedded BamA-P4P5 in Figure 3B.
  2. Backbone assignments
    1. Optimize a 1D 15N to 13CΞ± specific CP experiment47. Place the 13C carrier in the middle of the CΞ± region around 55 ppm. Use a 13C rf amplitude of 20 kHz and vary the 15N amplitude from 35 to 45 kHz for maximal transfer to the CΞ± signals and minimal transfer to the carbonyl signals. Optimize the contact time from 3 to 10 ms in increments of 1 ms.
    2. Run a 3D CΞ±NH experiment. Transfer all CP amplitudes, contact times, and pulse lengths from the previously optimized steps. Use approximately 10 ms and 30 ms in the indirect and direct acquisition dimensions. Process the spectrum with squared sin bell functions (QSIN) in all three dimensions.
    3. Optimize a 1D CΞ± to CO DREAM magnetization transfer48. Start with a 15N to 13CΞ± specific CP transfer. Then, transfer the magnetization from CΞ± to CO using a spin lock on the 13C channel. Vary the rf amplitude from 20 to 35 kHz for optimal transfer. Optimize the transfer time from 4 to 10 ms.
    4. Run a 3D CΞ±(CO)NH experiment. Transfer all rf amplitudes, contact times, and pulse lengths from the previously optimized steps. Use approximately 10 ms and 30 ms in the indirect and direct acquisition dimensions. Process the spectrum with squared sin bell functions (QSIN) in all three dimensions.
    5. Repeat and adapt steps 1-4 for the analogous 3D CONH and CO(CΞ±)NH experiments. Use this quartet of 3D experiments for sequential CΞ± and CO walks to assign the protein backbone, as shown on the example of KcsA in Figure 428.

6. Protein dynamics by 1H-detected ssNMR spectroscopy

  1. For 15N T1 studies, use the previously optimized 2D NH experiment at 60 kHz MAS and include a delay after the first 1H to 15N cross-polarization step. Acquire a series of 2D NH experiments and vary the delay from 0 to 16 s using steps of, e.g., 0, 2, 4, 8, and 16 s.
  2. Plot the normalized intensities for resolved signals as a function of the increasing delay time. Fit the T1 decay to single exponentials according to y = exp(-x/T1), with y being the signal intensity at decay time x.
  3. Analogously, for 15N T1rho studies, include a spin-lock pulse in the pulse program on the 15N channel with an rf amplitude between 15-20 kHz after the first 1H to 15N cross-polarization step26,49. Acquire a series of 2D NH experiments and vary the delay from 0 to 150 ms and fit the T1rho decay of resolved signals to single exponentials. Illustrative 15N T1rho data is shown for membrane-embedded K+ channels in Figure 527,28.

7. Dynamic nuclear polarization

NOTE: The following preparative steps relate to the use of a commercial DNP setups using 3.2 mm sapphire MAS rotors (Figure 6)20. Use of the zirconia rotors or other DNP equipment may lead to lower DNP signal enhancements.

  1. Resuspend membrane protein pellet (from step 3.1) in 50 Β΅L of deuterated DNP buffer (60% (v/v) deuterated d8- and glycerol, and 15 mM AMUPol50. For experiments at 800 MHz, we recommend using 10 mM NATriPOL-351. Also see reference52 for further practical aspects to DNP ssNMR experiments.
  2. Centrifuge for 10-20 min at 100,000 x g at 4 Β°C so that a pellet is formed. Remove the supernatant with a pipette.
  3. Precool the centrifugal adaptor and the 3.2 mm sapphire MAS rotor components to <4 Β°C. The following steps (7.4-7.7) need to be done as quickly as possible to prevent the DNP agents from getting reduced.
  4. Place the 3.2 mm sapphire rotor in the centrifuge adapter and fill it with the suspension of proteo-liposomes from step 7.2.
  5. Pipette the resuspended membrane protein sample against the inner wall of the rotor carefully using a 200 Β΅L pipette tip. Allow the solution to slide down to the bottom of the rotor. Ensure that air bubbles are not formed.
  6. Spin down the sample in the rotor for 5-10 mins at 4,500 x g at 4 Β°C. Remove the supernatant containing excess DNP juice by pipetting it out carefully without disrupting the cell pellet. Repeat steps 6.4-6.6 until the rotor is full.
  7. Carefully position the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) spacer using the spacer screw on top of the rotor.
  8. Place the rotor, cap side down in a rotor plunger53 and plunge the rotor into liquid nitrogen. Allow at least 30-60 s for the rotor and the sample to freeze.
  9. Start up the heat exchanger unit and cool down the DNP probe to ~90K.
  10. Set the MAS unit to Manual mode and set the variable temperature (VT) to 135 l/h and bearing and drive gas flows to ~6 l/h.
  11. Engage Eject on the MAS console.
  12. Transfer the frozen sample from Step 7.8 from the liquid N2 into the sample catcher and place it in the probe (also see reference53).
  13. Manually increase the probe bearing pressure (Bp) to ~500 mbar before engaging the "Insert". This is advisable for stable and safe spinning of the rotor.
  14. Increase MAS rate to the desired value using the procedure described in reference53.
  15. Check for DNP enhancements with and without microwaves using a standard 1D CP experiments (also see, e.g., reference51,54) (Figure 7) before proceeding with multidimensional experiments, e.g., 2D CC experiments described in section 3 of this article.

Results

Figure 2Β shows representative gels for inclusion body purity (Panel A) and refolding of inclusion bodies (Panel B3). Figure 2 confirms the successful purification of 13C,15N-labeled BamA-P4P5.

Figure 3A shows a typical 2D 13C-13C spectrum of a well-ordered membrane protein, and Figure 3B shows a typical, high-quality 2D 15...

Discussion

Membrane proteins are key players in the regulation of vital cellular functions both in prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms; thus, understanding their action mechanisms at atomic levels of resolution is of vital importance. The existing structural biology techniques have pushed scientific understanding of membrane proteins quite far but have heavily relied on experimental data gathered from in vitroΒ systems devoid of membranes. In this article, an experimental approach is presented that allows to obtain atomistic i...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work is part of the research programs ECHO, TOP, TOP-PUNT, VICI, and VIDI with project numbers 723.014.003, 711.018.001, 700.26.121, 700.10.443, and 718.015.00, which are financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO).Β This article was supported by iNEXT-Discovery (project number 871037).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Ammonium molibdateMerck277908
Ammonium-15N ChlorideCortecnetCN80P50
AmpicillinSigma AldrichA9518
AMUpolCortecnetC010P005
BenzonaseEMD Millipore Corp70746-3
Boric acidMerckB6768
bromophenol blueSigmaB0126
calcium dichlorideMerck499609
Choline chlorideSigmaC-1879
Cobalt chlorideMerck449776
Copper sulphateMerckC1297
D-BiotinMerck8512090025
Deuterium OxideCortecnetCD5251P1000
Dimethyl sulfoxideMerckD9170
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidSigma AldrichL6876
Folic acidSigmaF-7876
Glucose 13C + 2HCortecnetCCD860P50
GlycerolHoneywellG7757
Glycerol (12C3, 99.95% D8, 98%)EurisotopeCDLM-8660-PK
glycerol (non-enriched)HoneywellG7757-1L
GlycineSigma Aldrich50046
Guanidine hydrochlorideRoth CarlNR.0037.1
Iron sulphateMerck307718
isopropyl Ξ²-D-1-thiogalactopyranosideThermofisherR0392
Lysogeny BrothMerckL3022
LysozymeSigma AldrichL6876
Magnesium chloride - hexahydrateFluka63064
magnesium sulphateMerckM5921
monopotassium phosphateMerck1051080050
MyoinositolSigmaI-5125
n-Dodecyl-B-D-maltosideAcros Organics3293702509
N,N-Dimethyldodecylamine N-oxideMerck40236
NicatinamideSigmaN-3376
Panthotenic acidSigma21210-25G-F
protease inhibitorSigmaP8849
Pyridoxal-HClSigma AldrichP9130
RiboflavinAldrichR170-6
Sodium ChlorideMerckK51107104914
Sodium dihydrogen phospahte - monohydrateSigma Aldrich1,06,34,61,000
Sodium dodecyl sulfateThermo-scientific28365
Sodium hydroxideMerck1,06,49,81,000
SucroseSigma Life ScienceS9378
Thiamine-HClMerck5871
Tris-HClSigma Aldrich10,70,89,76,001
Zinc chlorideMerck208086
E.coli BL21 DE3*New England BiolabsC2527
1.5 mL Ultra-tubesBeckman Coulter357448
30 kDa centrifugal filterAmiconUFC903024
3.2 mm sapphire DNP rotor with capsCortecnetH13861
3.2 mm teflon insertCortecnetB6628
3.2 mm sample packer/unpackerCortecnetB6988
3.2 mm Regular Wall MAS RotorCortecnetHZ16913
3.2 mm Regular Wall MAS rotorCortecnetHZ09244
Tool Kit for 3.2 mm Thin Wall rotorCortecnetB136904
1.3 mm MAS rotor + capsCortecnetHZ14752
1.3 mm filling toolCortecnetHZ14714
1.3 mm sample packerCortecnetHZ14716
1.3 mm cap removerCortecnetHZ14706
1.3 mm cap set toolCortecnetHZ14744
Dialysis tubing 12-14 kDaSpectra/Por132703
Sharpie - BlackMerckHS15094

References

  1. Weingarth, M., Baldus, M. Solid-state NMR-based approaches for supramolecular structure elucidation. Accounts of Chemical Research. 46 (9), 2037-2046 (2013).
  2. Kaplan, M., Pinto, C., Houben, K., Baldus, M. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) applied to membrane-protein complexes. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. 49, 15 (2016).
  3. Brown, L. S., Ladizhansky, V. Membrane proteins in their native habitat as seen by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Protein Science. 24 (9), 1333-1346 (2015).
  4. Ladizhansky, V. Applications of solid-state NMR to membrane proteins. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta. Proteins and Proteomics. 1865 (11), 1577-1586 (2017).
  5. Hong, M., Zhang, Y., Hu, F. H. Membrane protein structure and dynamics from NMR spectroscopy. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry. 63, 1-24 (2012).
  6. Shahid, S. A., et al. Membrane-protein structure determination by solid-state NMR spectroscopy of microcrystals. Nature Methods. 9 (12), 1212-1217 (2012).
  7. Wang, S. L., et al. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy structure determination of a lipid-embedded heptahelical membrane protein. Nature Methods. 10 (10), 1007-1012 (2013).
  8. Herzfeld, J., Lansing, J. C. Magnetic resonance studies of the bacteriorhodopsin pump cycle. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure. 31 (1), 73-95 (2002).
  9. Ketchem, R. R., Hu, W., Cross, T. A. High-resolution conformation of gramicidin A in a lipid bilayer by solid-state NMR. Science. 261 (5127), 1457-1460 (1993).
  10. Lange, A., et al. Toxin-induced conformational changes in a potassium channel revealed by solid-state NMR. Nature. 440 (7086), 959-962 (2006).
  11. Cady, S. D., et al. Structure of the amantadine binding site of influenza M2 proton channels in lipid bilayers. Nature. 463 (7281), 689-692 (2010).
  12. Park, S. H., et al. Structure of the chemokine receptor CXCR1 in phospholipid bilayers. Nature. 491 (7426), 779-783 (2012).
  13. Luca, S., et al. The conformation of neurotensin bound to its G protein-coupled receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 (19), 10706-10711 (2003).
  14. Joedicke, L., et al. The molecular basis of subtype selectivity of human kinin G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature Chemical Biology. 14 (3), 284-290 (2018).
  15. Krug, U., et al. The conformational equilibrium of the neuropeptide Y2 receptor in bilayer membranes. Angewandte Chemie (International Edition in English). 59 (52), 23854-23861 (2020).
  16. Maly, T., et al. Dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic fields. Journal of Chemical Physics. 128 (5), (2008).
  17. Bajaj, V. S., Mak-Jurkauskas, M. L., Belenky, M., Herzfeld, J., Griffin, R. G. Functional and shunt states of bacteriorhodopsin resolved by 250 GHz dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced solid-state NMR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (23), 9244-9249 (2009).
  18. Linden, A. H., et al. Neurotoxin II bound to acetylcholine receptors in native membranes studied by dynamic nuclear polarization NMR. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 133 (48), 19266-19269 (2011).
  19. Ong, Y. S., Lakatos, A., Becker-Baldus, J., Pos, K. M., Glaubitz, C. Detecting substrates bound to the secondary multidrug efflux pump EmrE by DNP-enhanced solid-state NMR. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 135 (42), 15754-15762 (2013).
  20. Koers, E. J., et al. NMR-based structural biology enhanced by dynamic nuclear polarization at high magnetic field. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 60 (2-3), 157-168 (2014).
  21. Becker-Baldus, J., et al. Enlightening the photoactive site of channelrhodopsin-2 by DNP-enhanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 112 (32), 9896-9901 (2015).
  22. Kaplan, M., et al. EGFR dynamics change during activation in native membranes as revealed by NMR. Cell. 167 (5), 1241-1251 (2016).
  23. Visscher, K. M., et al. Supramolecular organization and functional implications of K+ channel clusters in membranes. Angewandte Chemie (International Edition in English). 56 (43), 13222-13227 (2017).
  24. Joedicke, L., et al. The molecular basis of subtype selectivity of human kinin G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature Chemical Biology. 14, 284 (2018).
  25. Pinto, C., et al. Formation of the beta-barrel assembly machinery complex in lipid bilayers as seen by solid-state NMR. Nature Communications. 9, (2018).
  26. Good, D. B., et al. Conformational dynamics of a seven transmembrane helical protein Anabaena Sensory Rhodopsin probed by solid-state NMR. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 136 (7), 2833-2842 (2014).
  27. Medeiros-Silva, J., et al. (1)H-detected solid-state NMR studies of water-inaccessible proteins in vitro and in situ. Angewandte Chemie (International Edition in English). 55 (43), 13606-13610 (2016).
  28. Jekhmane, S., et al. Shifts in the selectivity filter dynamics cause modal gating in K(+) channels. Nature Communications. 10 (1), 123 (2019).
  29. Schubeis, T., Le Marchand, T., Andreas, L. B., Pintacuda, G. 1H magic-angle spinning NMR evolves as a powerful new tool for membrane proteins. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 287, 140-152 (2018).
  30. Sinnige, T., et al. Solid-state NMR studies of full-length BamA in lipid bilayers suggest limited overall POTRA mobility. Journal of Molecular Biology. 426 (9), 2009-2021 (2014).
  31. Sinnige, T., et al. Insight into the conformational stability of membrane-embedded BamA using a combined solution and solid-state NMR approach. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 61 (3-4), 321-332 (2015).
  32. Sinnige, T., et al. Conformational plasticity of the POTRA 5 domain in the outer membrane protein assembly factor BamA. Structure. 23 (7), 1317-1324 (2015).
  33. Renault, M., Bos, M. P., Tommassen, J., Baldus, M. Solid-state NMR on a large multidomain integral membrane protein: the outer membrane protein assembly factor BamA. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 133 (12), 4175-4177 (2011).
  34. Doyle, D. A., et al. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science. 280 (5360), 69-77 (1998).
  35. Wylie, B. J., Bhate, M. P., McDermott, A. E. Transmembrane allosteric coupling of the gates in a potassium channel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111 (1), 185-190 (2014).
  36. Xu, Y., Zhang, D., Rogawski, R., Nimigean, C. M., McDermott, A. E. Identifying coupled clusters of allostery participants through chemical shift perturbations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 116 (6), 2078-2085 (2019).
  37. vander Cruijsen, E. A. W., Prokofyev, A. V., Pongs, O., Baldus, M. Probing conformational changes during the gating cycle of a potassium channel in lipid bilayers. Biophysical Journal. 112 (1), 99-108 (2017).
  38. Varga, K., Tian, L., McDermott, A. E. Solid-state NMR study and assignments of the KcsA potassium ion channel of S. lividans. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics. 1774 (12), 1604-1613 (2007).
  39. Zhang, D., Howarth, G. S., Parkin, L. A., McDermott, A. E. NMR studies of lipid regulation of the K+ channel KcsA. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. , 183491 (2020).
  40. Schneider, R., et al. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy applied to a chimeric potassium channel in lipid bilayers. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 130 (23), 7427-7435 (2008).
  41. Raleigh, D. P., Levitt, M. H., Griffin, R. G. Rotational resonance in solid-state Nmr. Chemical Physics Letters. 146 (1-2), 71-76 (1988).
  42. Schaefer, J., Stejskal, E. O. C-13 nuclear magnetic-resonance of polymers spinning at magic angle. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 98 (4), 1031-1032 (1976).
  43. Fung, B. M., Khitrin, A. K., Ermolaev, K. An improved broadband decoupling sequence for liquid crystals and solids. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 142 (1), 97-101 (2000).
  44. Weingarth, M., Bodenhausen, G., Tekely, P. Low-power decoupling at high spinning frequencies in high static fields. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 199 (2), 238-241 (2009).
  45. Loquet, A., Tolchard, J., Berbon, M., Martinez, D., Habenstein, B. Atomic scale structural studies of macromolecular assemblies by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (127), (2017).
  46. Zhou, D. H., Rienstra, C. M. High-performance solvent suppression for proton detected solid-state NMR. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 192 (1), 167-172 (2008).
  47. Baldus, M., Petkova, A. T., Herzfeld, J., Griffin, R. G. Cross polarization in the tilted frame: assignment and spectral simplification in heteronuclear spin systems. Molecular Physics. 95 (6), 1197-1207 (1998).
  48. Verel, R., Baldus, M., Ernst, M., Meier, B. H. A homonuclear spin-pair filter for solid-state NMR based on adiabatic-passage techniques. Chemical Physics Letters. 287 (3-4), 421-428 (1998).
  49. Lewandowski, J. R., Sass, H. J., Grzesiek, S., Blackledge, M., Emsley, L. Site-specific measurement of slow motions in proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 133 (42), 16762-16765 (2011).
  50. Sauvee, C., et al. Highly efficient, water-soluble polarizing agents for dynamic nuclear polarization at high frequency. Angewandte Chemie (International Edition in English). 52 (41), 10858-10861 (2013).
  51. Zhai, W., et al. Postmodification via thiol-click chemistry yields hydrophilic trityl-nitroxide biradicals for biomolecular high-field dynamic nuclear polarization. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B. 124 (41), 9047-9060 (2020).
  52. Ghosh, R., Kragelj, J., Xiao, Y., Frederick, K. K. Cryogenic sample loading into a magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer that preserves cellular viability. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (163), (2020).
  53. Narasimhan, S., et al. Characterizing proteins in a native bacterial environment using solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Nature Protocols. , (2020).
  54. Ni, Q. Z., et al. High frequency dynamic nuclear polarization. Accounts of Chemical Research. 46 (9), 1933-1941 (2013).
  55. Weingarth, M., et al. Quantitative analysis of the water occupancy around the selectivity filter of a K+ channel in different gating modes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 136 (5), 2000-2007 (2014).
  56. Lalli, D., et al. Proton-based structural analysis of a heptahelical transmembrane protein in lipid bilayers. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 139 (37), 13006-13012 (2017).
  57. Schubeis, T., et al. A beta-barrel for oil transport through lipid membranes: Dynamic NMR structures of AlkL. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 117 (35), 21014-21021 (2020).
  58. Baker, L. A., Daniels, M., vander Cruijsen, E. A. W., Folkers, G. E., Baldus, M. Efficient cellular solid-state NMR of membrane proteins by targeted protein labeling. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 62 (2), 199-208 (2015).
  59. Linser, R., et al. Proton-detected solid-state NMR spectroscopy of fibrillar and membrane proteins. Angewandte Chemie (International Edition in English). 50 (19), 4508-4512 (2011).
  60. Shukla, R., et al. Mode of action of teixobactins in cellular membranes. Nature Communications. 11 (1), 2848 (2020).
  61. Kaplan, M., et al. Probing a cell-embedded megadalton protein complex by DNP-supported solid-state NMR. Nature Methods. 12 (7), 649-652 (2015).
  62. Visscher, K. M., et al. Supramolecular organization and functional implications of K(+) channel clusters in membranes. Angewandte Chemie (International Edition in English). 56 (43), 13222-13227 (2017).
  63. Narasimhan, S., et al. DNP-supported solid-state NMR spectroscopy of proteins inside mammalian cells. Angewandte Chemie (International Edition in English). 58 (37), 12969-12973 (2019).
  64. Wu, R., Stephenson, R., Gichaba, A., Noinaj, N. The big BAM theory: An open and closed case. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes. 1862 (1), 183062 (2020).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Membrane ProteinsDrug TargetsSolid State NMRSsNMR SpectroscopyBiological MembranesAtomic ScaleHigh sensitivity MethodsProton detected SsNMRDynamic Nuclear PolarizationBamAKcsAIsotope labeled ProteinsStructural InformationMotional Information

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright Β© 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved