The authors have no acknowledgements.

This research was approved with a full waiver of informed consent by the University of Texas at Austin Institutional Review Board (IRB 2011-02-0021).
1. Beginning and Introducing the Session
<ol>
	<li>Ask participants to begin the session online. 
	NOTE: The session can take place in a lab or on participants&#39; own computers (desktop or laptop) outside the lab. The study requires a digital survey platform that has a time-based automatic proceeding feature (e.g., Qualtrics).</...

<ol>
	<li>Amir, O., Ariely, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Resting+on+laurels:+The+effects+of+discrete+progress+markers+as+subgoals+on+task+performance+and+preferences.">Resting on laurels: The effects of discrete progress markers as subgoals on task performance and preferences.</a> J. Exp. Psychol.-Learn. Mem. Cogn. 34 (5), 1158-1171 (2008).</li><li>Koo, M., Fishbach, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Dynamics+of+self-regulation:+How+(un)+accomplished+goal+actions+affect+motivation.">Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un) accomplished goal actions affect motivation.</a> J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94 (2), 183-195 (2008).</li><li>Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., Erez, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+determinants+of+goal+commitment.">The determinants of goal commitment.</a> Acad. Manage. Rev. 13 (1), 23-39 (1988).</li><li>Fishbach, A., Eyal, T., Finkelstein, S. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=How+positive+and+negative+feedback+motivate+goal+pursuit.">How positive and negative feedback motivate goal pursuit.</a> Soc. Person. Psychol. Compass. 4 (8), 517-530 (2010).</li><li>Zhang, Y., Fishbach, A., Dhar, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=When+thinking+beats+doing:+The+role+of+optimistic+expectations+in+goal-based+choice.">When thinking beats doing: The role of optimistic expectations in goal-based choice.</a> J. Cons. Res. 34 (4), 567-578 (2007).</li><li>F&#246;rster, J., Liberman, N., Friedman, R. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Seven+principles+of+goal+activation:+A+systematic+approach+to+distinguishing+goal+priming+from+priming+of+non-goal+constructs.">Seven principles of goal activation: A systematic approach to distinguishing goal priming from priming of non-goal constructs.</a> Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 11 (3), 211-233 (2007).</li><li>F&#246;rster, J., Liberman, N., Higgins, E. T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Accessibility+from+active+and+fulfilled+goals.">Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals.</a> J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 41 (3), 220-239 (2005).</li><li>Gollwitzer, P. M., Moskowitz, G. B., Higgins, E. T., Kruglanski, A. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Chapter+13,+Goal+effects+on+action+and+cognition.">Chapter 13, Goal effects on action and cognition.</a> Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. , 361-399 (1996).</li><li>Hassin, R. R., Aarts, H., Eitam, B., Custers, R., Kleiman, T., Morsella, E., Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Chapter+26,+Non-conscious+goal+pursuit+and+the+effortful+control+of+behavior.">Chapter 26, Non-conscious goal pursuit and the effortful control of behavior.</a> Oxford Handbook of Human Action: Social Cognition and Social Neuroscience. 2, 549-566 (2009).</li><li>Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., Tr&#246;tschel, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+automated+will:+Nonconscious+activation+and+pursuit+of+behavioral+goals.">The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals.</a> J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81 (6), 1014-1027 (2001).</li><li>Namkoong, J. -. E., Henderson, M. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Wanting+a+bird's+eye+to+understand+why:+Motivated+abstraction+and+causal+uncertainty.">Wanting a bird's eye to understand why: Motivated abstraction and causal uncertainty.</a> J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 64, 57-71 (2016).</li><li>Kunda, Z., Sinclair, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Motivated+reasoning+with+stereotypes:+Activation,+application,+and+inhibition.">Motivated reasoning with stereotypes: Activation, application, and inhibition.</a> Psychol. Inq. 10 (1), 12-22 (1999).</li><li>Nickerson, R. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Confirmation+bias:+A+ubiquitous+phenomenon+in+many+guises.">Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises.</a> Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2 (2), 175-220 (1998).</li><li>Agrawal, N., Maheswaran, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Motivated+reasoning+in+outcome-bias+effects.">Motivated reasoning in outcome-bias effects.</a> J. Cons. Res. 31 (4), 798-805 (2005).</li><li>Amabile, T. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Motivating+creativity+in+organizations:+On+doing+what+you+love+and+loving+what+you+do.">Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do.</a> Cal. Manag. Rev. 40 (1), 39-58 (1997).</li><li>Chiu, C. -. Y., Morris, M. W., Hong, Y. -. Y., Menon, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Motivated+cultural+cognition:+The+impact+of+implicit+cultural+theories+on+dispositional+attribution+varies+as+a+function+of+need+for+closure.">Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure.</a> J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 78 (2), 247-259 (2000).</li><li>Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=When+similarity+breeds+content:+Need+for+closure+and+the+allure+of+homogeneous+and+self-resembling+groups.">When similarity breeds content: Need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups.</a> J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83 (3), 648-662 (2002).</li><li>Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., Thompson, E. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Membership+has+its+(epistemic)+rewards:+Need+for+closure+effects+on+in-group+bias.">Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: Need for closure effects on in-group bias.</a> J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75 (2), 383 (1998).</li><li>Neuberg, S. L., Judice, T. N., West, S. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=What+the+Need+for+Closure+Scale+measures+and+what+it+does+not:+Toward+differentiating+among+related+epistemic+motives.">What the Need for Closure Scale measures and what it does not: Toward differentiating among related epistemic motives.</a> J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72 (6), 1396-1412 (1997).</li><li>Martin, L. L., Tesser, A., Moskowitz, G. B., Grant, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Chapter+10,+Five+markers+of+motivated+behavior.">Chapter 10, Five markers of motivated behavior.</a> The psychology of goals. , 257-276 (2009).</li><li>Kouider, S., Andrillon, T., Barbosa, L. S., Goupil, L., Bekinschtein, T. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Inducing+task-relevant+responses+to+speech+in+the+sleeping+brain.">Inducing task-relevant responses to speech in the sleeping brain.</a> Curr. Biol. 24 (18), 2208-2214 (2014).</li><li>Walker, M. P., Stickgold, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Sleep,+memory,+and+plasticity.">Sleep, memory, and plasticity.</a> Annual Review of Psychology. 57, 139-166 (2006).</li><li>Stickgold, R., Walker, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=To+sleep,+perchance+to+gain+creative+insight.">To sleep, perchance to gain creative insight.</a> Trends Cogn. Sci. 8 (5), 191-192 (2004).</li><li>Namkoong, J. -. E., Henderson, M. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=It's+simple+and+I+know+it!+Abstract+construals+reduce+causal+uncertainty.">It's simple and I know it! Abstract construals reduce causal uncertainty.</a> Soc. Psychol. Person. Sci. 5 (3), 352-359 (2014).</li><li>Fujita, K., Roberts, J. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Promoting+prospective+self-control+through+abstraction.">Promoting prospective self-control through abstraction.</a> J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 46 (6), 1049-1054 (2010).</li><li>Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., Markman, A. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=There+are+many+ways+to+see+the+forest+for+the+trees:+A+tour+guide+for+abstraction.">There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction.</a> Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 8 (5), 501-520 (2013).</li><li>Altmann, E. M., Trafton, J. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Memory+for+goals:+An+activation-based+model.">Memory for goals: An activation-based model.</a> Cogn. Sci. 26 (1), 39-83 (2002).</li><li>Zeigarnik, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Das+Behalten+erledigter+und+unerledigter+Handlungen.">Das Behalten erledigter und unerledigter Handlungen.</a> Psychologische Forschung. 9, 1-85 (1927).</li><li>Bargh, J. A., , ., , . <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+four+horsemen+of+automaticity:+Intention,+awareness,+efficiency,+and+control+in+social+cognition.">The four horsemen of automaticity: Intention, awareness, efficiency, and control in social cognition.</a> Handbook of Social Cognition. 1, 1-40 (1994).</li><li>Webster, D. M., Kruglanski, A. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Cognitive+and+social+consequences+of+the+need+for+cognitive+closure.">Cognitive and social consequences of the need for cognitive closure.</a> Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 8 (1), 133-173 (1997).</li><li>Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Motivated+closing+of+the+mind:+'Seizing'+and+'freezing'.">Motivated closing of the mind: 'Seizing' and 'freezing'.</a> Psychol. Rev. 103 (2), 263-283 (1996).</li><li>Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., Jarvis, W. B. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Dispositional+differences+in+cognitive+motivation:+The+life+and+times+of+individuals+varying+in+need+for+cognition.">Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition.</a> Psychol. Bull. 119 (2), 197-253 (1996).</li><li>Birdi, K. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=No+idea?+Evaluating+the+effectiveness+of+creativity+training.">No idea? Evaluating the effectiveness of creativity training.</a> J. Eur. Ind. Train. 29 (2), 102-111 (2005).</li><li>. Qualtrics Survery Software Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://mccombs.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_dnDvKjR8hO5qP0V">https://mccombs.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_dnDvKjR8hO5qP0V</a> (2017)</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

The methodology detailed in this paper allows researchers to test the activation and pursuit of a cognitive goal in a simple and economical way. It is especially suitable for automatic cognitive goals because automatic goal pursuit is more efficient29, and the typing interruption (i.e., the &#34;Natural Typing Task&#34;) prevents goals from being fulfilled through unconscious cognitive processes. Cognitive goals that are activated outside of participants&#39; awareness are also less susce...

Goal pursuit can take many forms, from educational attainment to healthy diets to finding happiness. Much research on goal pursuit investigates factors that moderate motivation levels or goal commitment1,2,3,4,5, while others focus on examining the consequences of active goals6,7,8,9,10. The methodology described and discussed in the current paper was specifically developed to test the activation and pursuit of cognitive goals and the associated consequences. A cognitive goal (or thinking goal) is defined as a desired state of mind11. Cognitive goals may encompass specific thought outcomes, such as those related to motivated reasoning12 or confirmation bias13, or they may be about achieving a certain mode of thinking, whether it is to be more accurate14 or to think more creatively15 or at a higher level11. While the antecedents and consequences of various cognitive goals have been examined in various empirical settings, the activation of these motivational states has often been implied rather than directly tested. For example, several studies have indirectly manipulated the need for cognitive closure by manipulating time pressure, but the actual activation of the motivational state was implied based on prior research16,17,18,19.
The setup of this methodology is based on one of the principles of goal pursuit6,10,20: that unsatisfied active goals lead to persistence, so individuals have a high tendency to resume if they have been interrupted during goal pursuit. In contrast, if the interrupted task is unrelated to goal pursuit, the rate of resumption amongst individuals would be relatively lower. To illustrate, an individual shooting hoops to reach a certain success rate is highly likely to resume the activity after being interrupted by a lunch break, even if there are other available activities that could be more appealing (e.g., playing a video game or taking a nap). In contrast, if the individual is shooting hoops simply because it is a convenient activity at the time, there is a lower chance that this person would resume after taking a lunch break, especially if other appealing activities are available.
A cognitive goal, when activated, would also result in a higher resumption rate if the individuals are interrupted during goal pursuit. However, there is a critical difference between interrupting a behavioral goal pursuit and interrupting a cognitive goal pursuit. Interrupting a behavioral goal pursuit typically means that the interruption is successful in pausing the goal pursuit process because, for instance, just as it is difficult to shoot hoops and eat lunch at the same time, it is challenging for people to be physically engaged in two separate tasks simultaneously. This is not the case, however, when interrupting the pursuit of cognitive goals. People can continue to have and develop thoughts, even during periods of interruptions, which is why people often find themselves persistently pondering unresolved issues, even when forced to step away to eat a meal or take a shower. In fact, recent studies have demonstrated that people engage in complex cognitive processes even when asleep21,22,23. The protocol introduced in the current research is designed to address this unique characteristic of cognitive goal pursuit: that people can continue to pursue and potentially even satisfy the activated cognitive goal during the interruption period. Specifically, this protocol includes an activity that distracts participants during the interruption stage to prevent automatic goal pursuit.
The gist of this protocol involves: (1) manipulating the activation of a proposed cognitive goal, (2) presenting an &#34;unrelated&#34; cognitive task that participants anticipate would either satisfy or dissatisfy the activated cognitive goal, (3) interrupting the cognitive task while creating a distraction, and (4) observing participants&#39; choices to resume or abandon the interrupted task. The underlying premise of the protocol is that participants would be more likely to resume an interrupted task if the task is perceived as an opportunity to satisfy the activated cognitive goal; therefore, a higher resumption rate in this condition provides empirical evidence that the proposed cognitive goal is indeed being actively pursued.
When implementing the protocol, participants are told that they will be completing three supposedly unrelated tasks. In reality, participants complete the first task but then have to choose between doing only the second or third task. In addition, the tasks are actually related, and each task serves an important purpose for the experiment. The first task manipulates cognitive goal activation. The second task (which is interrupted) manipulates whether or not that task is expected to satisfy the activated cognitive goal. The third task serves as an attractive alternative for when participants later choose between completing only the second task (resuming the interrupted task at the cost of a more enjoyable task) or completing only the third task (abandoning the interrupted task for a more enjoyable task). The interruption introduced at the beginning of the second task involves typing nonsense words. While participants are warned about this interruption at the beginning of the overall session, they are also told that the timing will be random. This is to enhance the feeling of disruptiveness.
While this protocol can be adapted to test the activation of a variety of cognitive goals, the example of a recent study, which tested whether causal uncertainty (i.e., uncertainty about why something happened) activates a goal to think more abstractly11, is used here in an attempt to provide more details and contextual background on the protocol. The theory was proposed and demonstrated as an extension of prior work showing that abstract thinking (considering central, overarching themes and similarities across events as opposed to peripheral, lower-level details and differences between events) reduces causal uncertainty24. As individuals recurrently experience the benefit of abstract thinking, they develop a tendency to activate a goal to think more abstractly when experiencing causal uncertainty. The survey is available online34.

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="789">
	<tbody>
		<tr height="49">
			<td height="49" style="height:49px;width:156px;">Computer</td>
			<td style="width:125px;">N/A</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">N/A</td>
			<td style="width:389px;">The survey requires a computer and cannot be implemented using a paper-and-pencil format.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="72">
			<td height="72" style="height:73px;width:156px;">Qualtrics Insight Platform</td>
			<td style="width:125px;">Qualtrics</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">N/A</td>
			<td style="width:389px;">Qualtrics is only one example. Both online and offline survey platforms are appropriate as long as a time-based automatic proceeding feature is available.</td>
		</tr>
		<tr height="32">
			<td height="32" style="height:33px;width:156px;">IBM SPSS Statistics</td>
			<td style="width:125px;">IBM Corporation</td>
			<td style="width:119px;">N/A</td>
			<td>Other statistical software may be used.</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>

task interruption and resumption paradigm for testing the activation and pursuit of an abstract thinking goal

This protocol is based on the task interruption and resumption paradigm, the premise of which is that active goals lead to persistent behavior and thus a higher resumption rate after a period of delay or interruption. The task interruption and resumption protocol described in this research is tailored to test the activation of cognitive goals (e.g., a goal to think more abstractly). Cognitive goals may be pursued even during the interruption period; thus, to prevent this, the protocol involves cognitive distraction. The protocol consists of several stages. Specifically, the initial stage includes the goal activation process, where the treatment (versus control) condition receives a manipulation to activate the cognitive goal being tested by the researcher. In the next stage, participants are presented with the introduction of a task that is perceived to either satisfy or not satisfy the cognitive goal of interest. Importantly, this task is interrupted a few seconds after it begins. The task interruption forces a delay period and introduces a cognitive distraction to prevent the automatic pursuit and fulfillment of the cognitive goal. After the interruption period, participants are given a choice between resuming the interrupted task and abandoning the interrupted task to complete an alternative task instead. Among participants whose cognitive goals had been activated at the earlier stage, the task resumption rate should be higher if the task was perceived as an opportunity to satisfy (versus not satisfy) the goal. Such a finding would provide empirical evidence that the cognitive goal has been activated and pursued. In previous research, this protocol has been used to test whether causal uncertainty activates an abstract thinking goal. Adapting the protocol to test the activation of other cognitive goals is also discussed.

The above method was implemented by Namkoong and Henderson11 in their first study, which consisted of two data sets. The two data sets were combined for the analysis because the pattern of results was consistent across both. Participants were 297 college students from two different public universities (168 females; age range 17 to 48 years, mean (M) age = 20.43 years, standard deviation (SD) = 3.78 years), and they completed the survey in exchange...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal at JoVE.com

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

This protocol was designed to test the activation and pursuit of cognitive goals (e.g., an abstract thinking goal) using the task interruption and resumption paradigm. The protocol is suitable for cognitive goals that are automatically pursued once activated, as the distraction procedure prevents goal pursuit during the interruption period.

This protocol is based on the task interruption and resumption paradigm, the premise of which is that active goals lead to persistent behavior and thus a ...

This experimental procedure is based on the task interruption and resumption paradigm and is developed to test the activation and pursuit of cognitive goals. Our procedure, tests the activation of cognitive goals by first interrupting participants during a task and then measuring task resumption. Because a high task resumption rate is an indication of goal pursuit.The challenge is that pursuing a cognitive goal can be a very efficient process, so we introduce a cognitive distraction during the interruption stage, to prevent automatic goal pursuit from happening. Begin by escorting the participant to the testing computer. Ask them to read basic descriptions of the overall survey procedure and to complete the online consent form.Then inform them that they should click the continue button to proceed after every page. On the screen present the participant with an important notice message on the screen, and inform them that at some time during the session they will be interrupted briefly, but suddenly by the natural typing task designed to measure participants'natural typing speeds. Through the instructions on the screen, inform the participant that this task will involve typing nonsense words with no meaning.Then show a question asking whether the participant has carefully read all the information about the interruption. Have them select Yes and Continue to proceed to the next page. Then present an overview of the three tasks that the participant would supposedly be doing and provide a brief description and the expected duration of each task.Make sure that all tasks have the same duration. Note, the next part of the study is designed to activate the cognitive goal being tested. Show instructions to the participant that indicate they will now start the Relationship Conflict Task.Then on the following page, ask them to recall a recent relationship conflict that they had with someone they are close to and fill in the open-ended question. On the same screen, below the text box, ask questions about the relationship conflict such as, with whom and how intense the conflict was? To ensure that the participant comes up with a specific conflict as oppose to general dissatisfaction in a relationship.Manipulate high or low causal uncertainty by asking the participant to elaborate on the recent relationship conflict. With the focus on high or low causal uncertainty, respectively. Then ask manipulation check questions using seven point scales so that participants can indicate how certain or uncertain they feel about the reason behind the conflict.Next inform the participant that they will start the Picture Impression Task. In which they will see five pairs of pictures and that for each pair, they must identify one thing that makes the pictures either similar or different from one another. Note, similarity focus involves abstract thinking while difference focus involves concrete thinking.Then show the participant an incomplete image to make the screen appear as if the first pair of pictures of the Picture Impression Task is being loaded without showing any parts of the pictures. After two to three seconds, have the screen automatically proceed to a different page to start the task interruption procedure. Instruct the participant to complete the Natural-Typing Task by clicking the Start button and typing the 49 nonsense words presented on the screen.After clicking Continue, inform the participant that instead of completing all tasks as originally planned, they must choose between resuming the interrupted second task, Picture Impression or completing the third task, Humor Evaluation. On the same screen, show the task descriptions and remind the participant that both tasks will take 2 minutes and involve five trials to prevent them from choosing the task that simply seems easier or quicker to finish. Finally, conclude the session by allowing the participant complete the task of their choice and by asking demographic questions of interest.Then debrief the participant about the study. Overall, participants'task resumption patterns differed between the high versus low causal uncertainty condition. These results revealed a significant interaction between causal uncertainty and task control construer in predicting the rate of task resumption.The percentage of participants that resumed the task was affected by the interaction. Specifically, in the high causal uncertainty condition the task resumption rate was greater if the interrupted task was about similarity versus difference focus. This procedure was used in previous research to test whether causal uncertainty activates the goal to think more abstractly.However, we do believe that this can be adapted to test other kinds of cognitive goals. For example, if somebody developed an educational software that promotes creative thinking, this procedure can be modified to test whether the software does what it's supposed to do by simply changing some of the tasks in the study. There are some important things to consider when adapting this procedure.First, researchers should make sure that the interrupted task is perceived by participants as an activity that can either fulfill or not fulfill the cognitive goal that's being tested. Second, researchers should also make sure that the alternative task that the participants can choose instead of resuming, is seen as something that is inherently more enjoyable. That way, they can make the case that the observed task resumption is indeed a result of goal pursuit.This is also important because task resumption rate is generally high, even without a cognitive goal. This is because people have a natural tendency to want to complete things, which can potentially lead to a ceiling effect. Running plenty of pilot tests to ensure that these conditions have been met, is critical for a successful adaptation.And with these proper adaptations this procedure can be highly versatile.

task-interruption-resumption-paradigm-for-testing-activation-pursuit

Research

JoVE Journal

Behavior

6.1K 조회수.  University of Nevada. This experimental procedure is based on the task interruption and resumption paradigm and is developed to test the activation and pursuit of cognitive goals. Our procedure, tests the activation of cognitive goals by first interrupting participants during a task and then measuring task resumption. Because a high task resumption rate is an indication of goal pursuit.The challenge is that pursuing a cognitive goal can be a very efficient process, so we introduce a cognitive distraction du...