Manufacture and Drug Delivery Applications of Silk Nanoparticles

Podsumowanie

Nanoparticles are emerging as promising drug delivery systems for a broad range of indications. Here, we describe a simple yet powerful method to manufacture silk nanoparticles using reverse engineered Bombyx mori silk. These silk nanoparticles can be readily loaded with a therapeutic payload and subsequently explored for drug delivery applications.

Streszczenie

Silk is a promising biopolymer for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications due to its outstanding mechanical properties, biocompatibility and biodegradability, as well its ability to protect and subsequently release its payload in response to a trigger. While silk can be formulated into various material formats, silk nanoparticles are emerging as promising drug delivery systems. Therefore, this article covers the procedures for reverse engineering silk cocoons to yield a regenerated silk solution that can be used to generate stable silk nanoparticles. These nanoparticles are subsequently characterized, drug loaded and explored as a potential anticancer drug delivery system. Briefly, silk cocoons are reverse engineered first by degumming the cocoons, followed by silk dissolution and clean up, to yield an aqueous silk solution. Next, the regenerated silk solution is subjected to nanoprecipitation to yield silk nanoparticles – a simple but powerful method that generates uniform nanoparticles. The silk nanoparticles are characterized according to their size, zeta potential, morphology and stability in aqueous media, as well as their ability to entrap a chemotherapeutic payload and kill human breast cancer cells. Overall, the described methodology yields uniform silk nanoparticles that can be readily explored for a myriad of applications, including their use as a potential nanomedicine.

Wprowadzenie

Nano-sized drug delivery systems are often used to control drug release and to deliver a diverse set of therapeutic payloads – for example, proteins, peptides and small molecular weight drugs – to target cells and tissues. These therapeutic payloads are often incorporated into various macromolecular drug carriers, such as liposomes, water soluble polymers (including dendrimers), and micro- and nanoparticles¹. Nanoparticles (typically in a size range of 1 nm to 1,000 nm) are being widely explored as potential drug carriers, particularly for anticancer drug delivery². The successful introduction of Abraxane (120 nm sized albumin-based nanoparticles loaded with paclitaxel) into routine clinical practice³ has catalyzed the field, so that many more nanoparticles for drug delivery are now entering clinical trials⁴. Solid tumors generally show poor lymphatic drainage and have leaky blood vessels which means that nanoparticles of up to 200 nm will be passively targeted to these tumors following intravenous administration. This passive targeting phenomenon is called the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and was first reported in 1986⁵. The EPR effect can lead to a 50- to 100-fold increase in drug concentrations within the tumor microenvironment for a given drug dose when the drug payload is delivered using a macromolecular drug carrier approach rather than the free drug without the carrier. Drug-loaded nanoparticles designed for anticancer drug delivery have to reach the tumor microenvironment and often must enter a specific intracellular compartment, usually by endocytic uptake, for the drug to achieve its desired therapeutic effect³. Nanoparticles designed for intracellular drug delivery exploit endocytosis as a gateway into the cell as well as a route to overcome drug resistance mechanisms. Drug release from nanoparticles is often specifically designed to occur in lysosomes (i.e., lysosomotropic drug delivery)⁶ where the pH responsiveness of the nanoparticle carrier (lysosomal pH approximately 4.5) can serve as trigger for drug release or lysosomal enzymes that liberate the payload from the carrier⁷.

Many different classes of materials can be used to generate nanoparticles (e.g., metals and many organic and inorganic materials). However, biopolymers are emerging as attractive materials because of their known biocompatibility, biodegradability and low toxicity⁸. Many biopolymers are being explored, including albumin, alginate, chitosan and silk. Of these, silk has emerged as a promising contender for development into drug delivery systems⁹. Silks of various types are produced by a number of arthropods, including spiders (e.g., Nephila clavipes) and silkworms (e.g., Bombyx mori). Silkworm silk is used far more extensively than spider silk because the silkworm is fully domesticated and its silk thus represents a reproducible starting material. Silkworm silk is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved material for human use, particularly as a suture material; it has a robust safety record in humans and is known to degrade in vivo¹⁰. The degradation profile of silk can be fine-tuned to range from hours (low crystalline silk) to 12 months or more (high crystalline silk). Silk degradation products are non-toxic and are metabolized in the body¹⁰. The silk structure imparts the ability to bind small molecular weight compounds and macromolecular protein drugs¹¹, making it a good material for controlled drug release. Protein drugs (e.g., antibodies) are susceptible to denaturation, aggregation, proteolytic cleavage and clearance by the immune system. However, silk stabilizes therapeutic proteins due to the buffering capacity of its nanocrystalline regions and its ability to tailor water content at the nanoscale¹¹. These unique features provide physical protection and reduce payload mobility¹¹ and are typically not seen with other (bio)polymers. Many anticancer drug delivery systems, for example silk-based hydrogels¹², films^13-15 and nanoparticles^16,17, have now been developed to exploit these features (reviewed in references^18,19 )

Here, silk nanoparticles were characterized by determining their size and charge over an extended time frame. Doxorubicin, a clinically relevant anticancer drug, was used as a model drug for drug loading and cytotoxicity studies in triple negative human breast cancer cells treated with drug-loaded silk nanoparticles.

Protokół

1. Preparation of a Reverse-engineered Silk Solution from Bombyx mori Cocoons

NOTE: This methodology is based on protocols described elsewhere ^12,27.

1. Cut 5 g of dried cocoons with scissors into 5 mm x 5 mm pieces. Remove any soiled layers.
2. Weigh out 4.24 g of sodium carbonate and add this carefully to 2 L of boiling distilled water.
   NOTE: This yields a 0.02 M sodium carbonate solution.
3. Add the cut cocoon pieces to the boiling sodium carbonate solution and boil for 60 min to degum the silk fibers. Stir the silk occasionally to ensure homogenous sample processing.
4. Remove the degummed silk and wash with 1 L of distilled water for 20 min; repeat the washing step at least 3 times.
5. Remove the washed silk and squeeze it well to remove excess liquid and then untie/pull the silk by hand. Place the untied silk in a fume hood to air dry overnight. This typically yields 3.6 g of degummed silk fibers.
6. The next day, weigh out 5 g air-dried degummed silk fibers and pack the silk tightly into the bottom of a 50 ml beaker.
7. Prepare a fresh 9.3 M LiBr solution. Dissolve the silk fibers in LiBr using a 1 g silk to 4 ml LiBr ratio. Cover the silk LiBr sample with aluminum foil to prevent evaporation and allow the silk to dissolve completely at 60 °C. This step takes up to 4 hr and is aided by occasionally stirring.
8. Wet a dialysis cassette (molecular weight cut-off of 3,500 Da) in water for 5 min. Inject 15 ml the silk LiBr solution into the 15 ml dialysis cassette and use a needle and syringe to remove any air bubbles.
9. Dialyze against 1 L of distilled water and change the water at 1, 3 and 6 hr (i.e., 3 changes on the first day) and again on the next morning and evening (i.e., 2 changes on the second day), and again on the following morning (i.e., 1 change on the third day).
10. Collect the silk solution from the dialysis cassette and centrifuge the solution for 20 min at 5 °C at 9,500 x g. Recover the supernatant and repeat this centrifugation process twice more.
11. Determine the weight of an empty weighing boat (W1) and add 1 ml of the silk solution. Record the weight again (W2) and then dry the sample by leaving the weighing boat at 60 ºC overnight. Next, determine the total dry weight (W3) (dried silk and weighing boat). The concentration of the silk solution (w/v) is: % = (W3-W1/W2-W1) x 100.

2. Preparation of Silk Nanoparticles from Reverse-engineered Silk Solution

1. Add a 5% (w/v) silk solution dropwise to acetone while maintaining a >75% (v/v) acetone solution. For example, add 9 ml of a 5% (w/v) silk solution dropwise (10 µl/drop at a rate of 50 drops/min) to 34 ml acetone.
2. Centrifuge the precipitate at 48,000 x g for 2 hr at 4 °C.
3. Aspirate the supernatant and resuspend the pellet in distilled water by first dislodging the pellet with a spatula and then adding 20 ml distilled water. Use pipet tips to remove the pellet from the spatula. After vortexing for 20 sec followed by two sonication cycles using an ultrasonic probe at 30% amplitude for 30 sec, top up the centrifuge tube to capacity with distilled water.
4. Repeat the centrifugation and resuspension step at least twice.
5. Resuspend the pellet in 6 ml distilled water, as detailed in 2.3 and store at 4 °C until use. For cell culture studies, silk nanoparticle stocks can be gamma irradiated¹⁷.

3. Determination of Silk Nanoparticle Concentration

1. Centrifuge silk nanoparticles at 48,000 x g for 2 hr at 4 °C.
2. Collect all nanoparticles in 3 ml of distilled water, followed by two sonication cycles at 30% amplitude for 30 sec.
3. Divide the 3 ml stock of silk nanoparticles into 2 ml and 1 ml lots and transfer into pre-weighed 2 ml tubes. Record the total weight of the 2 ml sample. Store the 1 ml lot at 4 °C until use; this 1 ml sample will be used to generate a calibration curve.
4. Snap freeze and then lyophilize the 2 ml silk nanoparticle lot in a freeze dryer overnight. After freeze-drying, reweigh the 2 ml tube and calculate the amount of silk nanoparticles (mg) that was originally present in the 2 ml sample.
5. Dilute the 1 ml silk nanoparticle stock with distilled water to generate a 5-point calibration curve (0.04-7 mg/ml). Ensure that samples do not exceed the absorbance maximum.
6. Determine the absorbance of each standard dilution at 600 nm. This is best done using a 96-well plate setup. Plot absorbance versus concentration (mg/ml) for the standard curve. Then use this standard curve routinely to determine the concentration of silk nanoparticles in suspensions.

4. Preparation of Doxorubicin-loaded Silk Nanoparticles

1. Preparation of the Doxorubicin Solution
   1. Dissolve 1.2 mg of doxorubicin HCl in 8 ml distilled water.
   2. Make up to 10 ml with distilled water to yield a working stock of 116 µg/ml (0.2 µmol/ml).
2. Preparation of Doxorubicin-loaded Silk Nanoparticles
   1. Mix 2 ml of 0.2 µmol/ml doxorubicin solution with 200 µl of 10, 30 or 50 mg/ml of silk nanoparticles in a 2 ml tube.
   2. Incubate the silk-doxorubicin suspension at room temperature (25 °C) overnight on a rotating mixer.
   3. Next, centrifuge the silk-doxorubicin suspension at 194,000 x g for 30 min. Wash the doxorubicin-loaded silk nanoparticles with distilled water and repeat this procedure twice more.
   4. Pool the supernatant and note the total volume (this sample is used to determine the encapsulation efficiency).
   5. Resuspend the doxorubicin-loaded silk nanoparticles in distilled water, protect from light and store at 4 ºC until use.
3. Determination of Encapsulation Efficiency and Drug Loading
   1. Pipet 200 µl of the supernatant from step 4.2.4 into a black microtiter plate.
   2. Use a fluorescence microplate reader to measure doxorubicin-associated fluorescence at a fixed photomultiplier setting.
   3. Set the excitation wavelength to 485 nm and emission wavelength to 590 nm and record the fluorescence values.
   4. Generate a doxorubicin calibration curve. Ensure measurements are acquired with identical instrument settings (i.e., with a fixed photomultiplier setting). Using the calibration curve, calculate the doxorubicin concentration in the combined supernatant. Repeat this measurement in three independent experiments.
   5. Use equation (1) to determine encapsulation efficiency:
      

5. Characterization of Silk Nanoparticles

1. Assessment of the Size and Zeta Potential of Freshly Prepared and Stored Silk Nanoparticles.
   1. Store silk nanoparticles in distilled water at 4 °C and 25 °C.
   2. Measure the size and zeta potential of the silk nanoparticles on days 0, 14 and 28 using dynamic light scattering (DLS). Set refractive indices to 1.33 for distilled water and 1.60 for protein¹⁷. Calculate particle sizes with the user interface software.
2. Morphological Assessment of Silk Nanoparticles by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).
   1. Place a carbon adhesive disc onto an SEM stub and subsequently attach a silicon wafer.
   2. Dilute silk nanoparticles to a concentration of 1 mg/ml. Pipette 10 µl of the sample onto a silicon wafer, freeze the sample at -80 °C and lyophilize overnight using a freeze drying system as per manufacturer's instructions.
   3. Coat the sample with a gold layer up to 20 nm thick using a low vacuum sputter coater.
      NOTE: Instrument settings vary between models. The model used here is fully automated and operates by thickness only.
   4. Image samples with a scanning electron microscope at 5 kV and a 40,000-fold magnification.

6. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Control and Doxorubicin-loaded Silk Nanoparticles

1. Cell Viability Following Exposure to Silk Nanoparticles.
   1. Culture MDA-MB-231 cells in RPMI 1640 with 10% v/v FBS. Plate cells on tissue culture treated polystyrene and incubate in a humidified 5% CO₂ atmosphere at 37 °C. Routinely subculture at 80% confluence every 2−3 days.
   2. Plate MDA-MB-231 cells at a density of 2 x 10⁴ cells/cm² in 96-well plates. Allow the cells to recover overnight.
   3. Add (i) 0.001-1 µg freely diffusible doxorubicin, (ii) 0.001-0.5 mg silk nanoparticles and 0.1 mg silk nanoparticles loaded with 0.001-1 µg doxorubicin into 96-well plates (final volume 100 µl per well).
   4. Determine cell viability and the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) by adding (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT 5 mg/ml in PBS) at 72 hr. Incubate for 5 hr, carefully drain the wells with a pipette and dissolve the formazan with 100 µl of dimethylsulfoxide. Measure the absorbance at 560 nm. Repeat this measurement in three independent experiments.
      NOTE: The absorbance values of untreated controls serve as a reference value for 100% cell viability.
2. SEM of Cells Exposed to Silk Nanoparticles.
   1. Seed MDA-MB-231 cells on sterile glass coverslips at a density of 2 x 10⁴ cells/cm². Allow the cells to recover overnight. Expose the cells to the desired treatment conditions for 72 hr.
   2. Fix the cells with 2% v/v glutaraldehyde in PBS for 30 min, wash with distilled water twice, dehydrate with an ethanol series, and critical point dry the samples, as detailed elsewhere²⁸.
   3. Sputter coat the samples with a gold layer up to 20 nm thick using a low vacuum sputter coater.
      NOTE: Instrument settings vary between models. The model used here is fully automated and operates by thickness only.
   4. Image the samples by SEM using an electron acceleration of 5 kV and 700-fold magnification.

Wyniki

Data were statistically analyzed as detailed previously¹⁷. The Student's t-test was used for sample pairs and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparison post hoc test for multiple samples. An asterisk denotes statistical significance as follows: *P <0.05 and **P <0.001. All data are presented as mean values ± standard deviation (SD) and the numbers in brackets indicate the number of independent experiments.

Dyskusje

Various methods are available to produce silk nanoparticles, including polyvinyl alcohol blending²⁰, spray drying²¹, salting out²², capillary microdot printing²³, supercritical CO₂ precipitation²⁴ and nanoprecipitation^16,25 (reviewed in reference²⁶). However, nanoprecipitation, due to its overall simplicity, is the most popular technique for generating silk nanoparticles. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to apply nanoprecipita...

Materiały

Name	Company	Catalog Number	Comments
Acetone	VWR International, Radnor, PA, USA	20066.33
Automated Critical Point Dryer	Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany	EM CPD300
Balancing	Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland	NewClassic MS
Black polystyrene microplate, 96 well	Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA	3991
Capillary cell (DTS 1070)	Malvern Instrument, Worcestershire, UK	DTS107
Carbon adhesive disc	Agar Scientific, Essex, UK	G3347N
Centrifuge	Hermle Labortechnik, Wehingen, Germany	Z323K
Centrifuge	Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA	Avanti J-E, Rotor: J20
Centrifuge	Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA	Optima L-70K, Rotor: 50.2 Ti, Adaptor 303392
Coater, low vacuum	Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany	EM ACE200
Cuvettes, polystyrene, disposable	Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA	FB55147
Doxorubixin	LC Laboratories, Boston, MA, USA	D4000
Electronic pipetting, Easypet	Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany	N/A
FE-SEM	Hitachi High-Technologies, Krefeld, Germany	SU6600
Fetal Bovine Serum	Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA	16000-044
Freeze dryer	Martin Christ, Osterode, Germany	Epsilon 2-4
Heat inactivated Bombyx mori silk cocoons	Tajima Shoji, Kanagawa, Japan	N/A
Hotplate with Stirrer	Bibby Scientific, Stanffordshire, UK	US 152
Incubator	Memmert, Schwabach, Germany	INB 200
Insulin, human recombinant, zinc solution	Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA	12585-014
Lithium bromide	Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium	AC199870025
MDA-MB-231	ATCC, Manassas, VA, U.S.A	N/A
Micropipette and tips	Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany	N/A
Microplate Reader	Molecular devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA	SpectraMax M5
Oak Ridge High-Speed Centrifuge Tubes, 50 ml	Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA	N/A
Open-Top Thickwall Polycarbonate tube, 4 ml	Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA	355645
Penicilin/streptomycin	Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA	15140-122
RPMI medium	Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA	11875-093
Serological pipettes, 5 ml	Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA
Silicon wafers	Agar Scientific, Essex, UK	G3391
Slide-A-Lyzer Dialysis cassettes, 3.5K MWCO, 15 ml	Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA	87724
Sodium carbonate anhydrous	Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA	S/2840/62
Specimen stubs for SEM	Agar Scientific, Essex, UK	G301
Ultrasonic homogenizer	Bandelin, Berlin, Germany	Sonoplus HD 2070
UV transparent microplate, 96 well	Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA	3635
Vortex	IKA, Staufen, Germany	Genius 3
Zetasizer	Malvern Instrument, Worcestershire, UK	Nano ZS
Zetasizer Software version 7.11		DLS software
Micro Modulyo	Thermo Fisher	230	Freeze drying system