JoVE Logo

Zaloguj się

Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.

W tym Artykule

  • Podsumowanie
  • Streszczenie
  • Wprowadzenie
  • Protokół
  • Wyniki
  • Dyskusje
  • Ujawnienia
  • Podziękowania
  • Materiały
  • Odniesienia
  • Przedruki i uprawnienia

Podsumowanie

The lacrimal gland (LG) has two cell types expressing α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA): myoepithelial cells (MECs) and pericytes. MECs are of ectodermal origin, found in many glandular tissues, while pericytes are vascular smooth muscle cells of endodermal origin. This protocol isolates MECs and pericytes from murine LGs.

Streszczenie

The lacrimal gland (LG) is an exocrine tubuloacinar gland that secretes an aqueous layer of tear film. The LG epithelial tree is comprised of acinar, ductal epithelial, and myoepithelial cells (MECs). MECs express alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA) and have a contractile function. They are found in multiple glandular organs and are of ectodermal origin. In addition, the LG contains SMA+ vascular smooth muscle cells of endodermal origin called pericytes: contractile cells that envelop the surface of vascular tubes. A new protocol allows us to isolate both MECs and pericytes from adult murine LGs and submandibular glands (SMGs). The protocol is based on the genetic labeling of MECs and pericytes using the SMACreErt2/+:Rosa26-TdTomatofl/fl mouse strain, followed by preparation of the LG single-cell suspension for fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). The protocol allows for the separation of these two cell populations of different origins based on the expression of the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) by MECs, whereas pericytes do not express EpCAM. Isolated cells could be used for cell cultivation or gene expression analysis.

Wprowadzenie

Myoepithelial cells (MECs) are present in many exocrine glands including lacrimal, salivary, harderian, sweat, prostate, and mammary. MECs are a unique cell type that combines an epithelial and a smooth muscle phenotype. MECs express α-smooth muscle actin (SMA) and have a contractile function1,2. In addition to MECs, the lacrimal gland (LG) and the submandibular gland (SMG) contains SMA+ vascular cells called pericytes, which are cells of endodermal origin that envelop the surface of vascular tubes3. Although MECs and pericytes express many markers, SMA is the only marker that is not expressed in other LG and SMG cells1,3.

Within the last 40 years, several laboratories reported assays for dissociation of different exocrine gland tissues, in which non-enzymatic and enzymatic approaches were applied. In one of the first reports published in 1980, Fritz and coauthors described a protocol to isolate feline parotid acini using sequential digestion in a collagenase/trypsin solution4. In 1989, Hann and coauthors adjusted this protocol for acini isolation from rat LGs using a mixture of collagenase, hyaluronidase and DNase5. In 1990, Cripps and colleagues published the method of non-enzymatic dissociation of lacrimal gland acini6. Later, in 1998, Zoukhri and coauthors returned to an enzymatic dissociation protocol for following up Ca2+-imaging on LG and SMG isolated acini7. Within the last decade, researchers have turned their focus on isolation of stem/progenitor cells from exocrine glands. Pringle and coauthors described a protocol in 2011 for isolation of mouse SMG stem cells8. This method was based on isolation of stem cell-containing salispheres, which were maintained in culture. The authors claimed that proliferating cells expressing stem cell-associated markers could be isolated from these salispheres8. Shatos and coauthors published the protocol for progenitor cell isolation from uninjured adult rat LGs using enzymatic digestion and collecting “liberated” cells9. Later, in 2015, Ackermann and coauthors adjusted this procedure to isolate presumptive "murine lacrimal gland stem cells" ("mLGSCs") that could be propagated as a mono-layer culture over multiple passages10. However, none of the before mentioned procedures allowed for distinguishing cellular subtypes and individual populations of isolated epithelial cells. In 2016, Gromova and coauthors published a procedure for isolation of LG stem/progenitor cells from adult murine LGs using FACS11. However, this protocol was not intended to isolate MECs.

Recently, we have shown that we are able to isolate SMA+ cells from 3 week-old SMA-GFP mice12. However, at this time we have not separated different populations of SMA+ cells. Here we established a new procedure for the direct isolation of differentiated MECs and pericytes from adult LGs and SMGs.

Protokół

All animal work was conducted according to the National Institute of Health (NIH) guidelines and was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Scripps Research Institute. All efforts were made to minimize the number of mice and their suffering. All experimental animals received a standard diet with free access to tap water.

NOTE: The main steps for MEC and pericyte isolation are outlined schematically in Figure 1A-F. All reagents and equipment used for this procedure are described in Table 1.

1. Mice and Labelling the SMA cells

  1. Use adult (2-4 months old) tamoxifen-inducible, αSMA driven reporter mice SMACreErt2/+:Rosa26-TdTomatofl/fl.
    NOTE: The SMACreErt2 strain was kindly provided by Dr. Ivo Kalajzic13. Rosa26-TdTomatofl/fl (B6.Cg-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm9(CAG-tdTomato)Hze/J, also known as Ai9) strain (# 007909) were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Sacramento, CA). SMA+ cells were labeled by intraperitoneal tamoxifen (TM) administration.
  2. Preparation of tamoxifen solution
    1. Prepare filtered corn oil. Use 0.22 µm vacuum filter since corn oil is viscous.
    2. Transfer 1 g of TM powder from the bottle into a 50 mL tube. Add 1 mL of ethanol to the bottle, cap and shake it to rinse then add to a 50 mL tube. Repeat once more with another 1 mL of ethanol.
    3. Add filtered corn oil to make 50 mL of a 20 mg/mL TM solution. Vortex the tube, wrap it in foil, and put it in a shaking water bath or shaking incubator at 45 °C.
    4. It may take about 12-24 h to dissolve the TM. From time to time, remove the tube and check for any remaining crystals. Once the TM is completely dissolved, aliquot and store at -80 °C. A thawed aliquot can be reused.
  3. To label SMA+ cells, inject mice intraperitoneally (IP) with TM on two sequential days.
    1. Inject 3-4 weeks old SMACreErt2/+:Rosa26-TdTomatofl/f any gender mice with TM at 100 µL/20 g (or 2 mg/20 g) body weight (Figure 1A). Mice are ready to be used for cell isolation in 2-3 days after the last TM injection. If needed, injected mice can be sacrificed at longer periods of time after TM injection.
      NOTE: As controls for proper compensation during FACS, one wild type (C57Bl/6) mouse and one SMACreErt2/+:Rosa26-TdTomatofl/fl mouse not injected with TM (with “unstained” MECs) of the same age would be required. Use the same calculations provided for 2 SMACreErt2/+:Rosa26-TdTomatofl/fl mice. Not injected SMACreErt2/+:Rosa26-TdTomatofl/fl will allow evaluation of the DSRed background. The C57Bl/6 mouse will serve as a negative control of unstained cells.

2. Solutions and Buffers

NOTE: The LG is an epithelial origin gland that contains an extracellular matrix that makes dissociation of cells difficult. Therefore, using a special combination of enzymes and a multistep digestion process described below is recommended.

  1. Dispase type II stock solution (25x)
    1. Dissolve 120 mg of dispase type II powder in 2 mL of 50 mM HEPES/150 mM NaCl to prepare a 25x stock solution (final concentration of dispase should be 30 Units/mL). Units per milligram may vary depending on the number of mice and concentration of the dispase should be adjusted accordingly.
    2. Prepare 200 µL aliquots and store them at -70 °C for up to 6 months or 4 °C for several days. Do not freeze/thaw the aliquot of dispase more than once to prevent enzyme degradation.
  2. DNase type I stock solution
    1. Dissolve 5 mg of DNase type I powder in a 5 mL solution of 50% glycerol, 20 mM Tris buffer (pH 7.5), and 1 mM MgCl2 (stock concentration should be approximately 2000 Units/mL). Units per milligram may vary depending on number of mice and thus concentration of DNase should be adjusted accordingly.
    2. Filter the stock solution using a 0.22 µm filter and a 10 mL syringe.
    3. Prepare 200 µL aliquots and store them at -70 °C for up to 6 months or 4 °C for several days. Do not freeze/thaw more than once to prevent enzyme degradation.
  3. Digestion medium
    1. To 10 mL of DMEM low glucose without glutamine, add 100 µL of cell culture supplement (e.g., Glutamax, see Table of Materials) for a dilution of 1:100.
    2. To 2 mL of DMEM low glucose with cell culture supplement, add 6 mg of Collagenase type I and mix thoroughly by pipetting (enzyme on wet ice), 160 µL of dispase stock solution (2.4 U/mL final concentration), 16 µL of DNase type I stock solution (8 U/mL final concentration), and 12 µL of 1 M CaCl2 (6 mM final concentration).
      NOTE: Calcium is required to increase enzymatic activity14,15. All calculations are provided for isolation of cells from four lacrimal glands from two adult mice. The volume of digestion medium may vary depending on the amount of tissue and number of replicates. Do not use more than 4 lacrimal glands from 2-4 months old mice per 2 mL medium.
  4. Blocking medium I
    1. To 25 mL of DMEM/F-12, add FBS (15% final concentration), 250 µL of cell culture supplement (see Table of Materials) for a dilution of 1:100, and 50 µL of 0.5 M EDTA pH 8.0 (1 mM final concentration).
      NOTE: Of the different types of medium that were compared for this protocol DMEM/F-12 gave the best results. This medium has also been used by other researchers to isolate/culture epithelial cells16,17.
  5. Blocking medium II
    1. To 25 mL of PBS, add 50 µL of 0.5 M EDTA pH 8.0 (1 mM final concentration).
  6. Recovery medium
    1. To 2 mL of HBSS supplemented with 5 mM MgCl2, add 100 µL of DNase type I stock solution to 100 U per 2 mL final concentration. Relatively high concentrations of DNase-type I is required to reduce aggregation of epithelial cells.
  7. Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer
    1. To 486.5 mL of PBS, add 12.5 mL of serum (2.5% final concentration) and 1 mL of 0.5 M EDTA pH 8.0 (1 mM final concentration).
      NOTE: The buffer can be stored at 4 °C for a maximum of 6 weeks.

3. Adult Mouse Lacrimal Gland Harvesting and Microdissection

  1. Anesthetize the mouse by isoflurane inhalation (adjust the isoflurane flow rate or concentration to 5% or greater) and sacrifice by cervical dislocation. Perform anesthesia and euthanasia according to institutional IACUCs recommendations.
  2. Using fine forceps and scissors, remove skin between the eye and ear (Figure 2A).
  3. To dissect a LG, gently pull LG using tweezers and at the same time scratch the connective tissue around the LG using the sharp tip of small scissors to free it (Figure 2B).
  4. Avoid cutting with scissors, as the LG and parotid salivary glands are located very close to each other and must be separated prior to dissection. When LG and parotid glands are separated, cut the LG out using scissors. Place glands into a 35 mm dish with 2 mL of cold PBS (keep on ice) (Figure 1B).
  5. As the LG is covered by a connective tissue capsule/envelope, trim any surrounding fat and connective tissue under a dissecting microscope and remove the LG capsule with two forceps.
    1. Repeat this step for all glands.
  6. Check a small piece of tissue under fluorescent microscope to ensure cell labeling (Figure 1C).

4. Preparation of LG Single-cell Suspension

  1. Transfer all LGs into a 35 mm dish with 0.5 mL of room temperature (RT) digestion media and mince LGs using small scissors into very small pieces (approximately 0.2-1 µm2). Normally, it takes about 3 min to mince 4 LGs (Figure 2C).
  2. Transfer minced tissue into a 2 mL round bottom tube using a wide-bore pipette filter tip. Use a normal sized pipette tip with the tip cut off (Figure 2D).
  3. Add up to 2 mL digestion medium and mix by inverting the tube.
  4. Place tube in a shaking incubator (or shaking water bath), at 37 °C, 100-120 rpm for 90 min.
  5. Every 30 min slowly pipette gland pieces 20-30 times using a 1,000 µL filter tip with the decreasing bore size (Figure 2D). After incubation/trituration, take a 10 µL aliquot and inspect under a microscope for clusters. If clusters persist, continue digestion.
  6. After 90 min, pass the sample 2-3 times through an insulin syringe needle (31G) to further release cells into suspension.
    NOTE: No visible lacrimal gland pieces should remain in the solution once digestion is completed (Figure 1D).
  7. Transfer cell suspension to a 15 mL tube and add blocking media type I to a total of 5 mL. Invert the tube 2-3 times to mix.
  8. Pass the cell suspension through a 70 μm cell strainer placed on a 50 mL tube. Wash the strainer with 1 mL of blocking media type I. Repeat step 4.8 again.
  9. Centrifuge samples at 0.4 x g for 5 min at RT.
  10. Aspirate the supernatant. Re-suspend cells in 2 mL of blocking medium type II using a 1 mL pipette tip and transfer the cell suspension into a 2 mL microcentrifuge tube.
  11. Centrifuge the cells at 0.4 x g (24 x 1.5/2.0 mL rotor; see Table of Materials) for 3 min at RT.
  12. Aspirate supernatant and re-suspend cells in 1 mL of cell detachment solution (see Table of Materials).
    NOTE: Here, the cell detachment solution is Accutase, a marine-origin enzyme with proteolytic and collagenolytic activity that detaches/dissociates cells for analysis of cell surface markers.
  13. Incubate cells at 37 °C, at 100-120 rpm for 2-3 min. Over-digestion with cell detachment solution may damage cellular membranes.
  14. Transfer cell suspension into a 50 mL tube and add up 10 mL of blocking medium type I. Centrifuge tube at 0.4 x g (24 x 1.5/2.0 mL rotor; see Table of Materials) for 5 min.
  15. Discard supernatant and re-suspend cells in 6 mL of recovery media and incubate cells for 30 min at RT.
  16. Check 10 µL of cell suspension under the microscope to ensure complete cell dissociation (Figure 3).
  17. Count cells using a cell counter and Trypan blue. Normally, we expect 4 x 105-6 x 106 cells from four LGs (one sample).
  18. Centrifuge cells at 0.4 x g (24 x 1.5/2.0 mL rotor; see Table of Materials) for 3 min at RT and proceed to antibody staining.

5. Antibody Staining

  1. Add up to 5 x105 cells to a 2 ml tube containing 400 µL of FACS buffer. Add 5 µL of Brilliant Violet 421 anti-mouse CD326 (EpCAM) and 0.5 µL of Ghost Red 780 (Viability Dye).
  2. In parallel, prepare controls to adjust FACS compensation:
    Negative control-1 (cells from wild type mouse)
    Background control unstained cells from SMACreErt2/+:Rosa26-TdTomatofl/fl
    Cy7-780 stained cells (cells from the wild type mouse stained with the Ghost Red 780 Viability Dye)
    EpCAM-Brilliant Violet 421 (cells from wild type mouse stained with the EpCAM-Brilliant Violet 421 antibody).
    NOTE: For each control sample use a minimum of 1 x 105 cells per 400 µL of FACS buffer.
  3. After adding each reagent mix cells thoroughly by pipetting.
  4. Wrap tube(s) with foil and rotate tubes for 45 min at 4 °C.
  5. Centrifuge samples at 0.4 x g (24 x 1.5/2.0 mL rotor; see Table of Materials) for 3 min at 4°C.
  6. Re-suspend cells in 1 mL of FACS buffer. It is important to wash cells to decrease the background during compensation.

6. Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting

  1. Transfer cell suspension into 5 mL FACS tubes and proceed with FACS analysis. Keep cells on ice.
  2. Adjust compensation using single color controls.
  3. Sort cells at 20 psi through a 100 μm nozzle using appropriate flow cytometer (see Table of Materials). Gating strategy18 is shown in Figure 1E and Figure 4.
  4. Collect sorted cells into medium, RNA-later, FACS or lysis buffers depending on downstream procedures (Figure 1E,F).

Wyniki

Mouse model to isolate SMA+ MECs and pericytes
The established protocol allows for the isolation of two pure populations: MECs and pericytes from LGs and SMGs (see Table 1). These two types of cells have a different size and appearance. Microvascular pericytes, develop around the walls of capillaries (Figure 5A) and have a squared shape (Figure 5B), while MECs surround the LG secretory acini,...

Dyskusje

This manuscript described a protocol of MEC and pericyte isolation from LG and SMG. This procedure was based on genetic labeling of SMA, the only reliable biomarker of MECs and pericytes.

The urgency to develop this protocol was motivated by the almost total absence of literature highlighting the isolation of MECs from murine LGs and SMGs. Although genetic labeling was previously used, using SMA-GFP mice to isolate SMA+ cells from young three-week-old LGs12, it did not ...

Ujawnienia

The authors declare no competing financial interests and no conflicts of any other interests.

Podziękowania

We thank Dr. Ivo Kalajzic for providing us with the SMACreErt2 mouse strain, Takeshi Umazume for mouse tailing and genotyping, Mark Shelley for acquiring professional pictures for Figure 2. We also thank Scripps Council of Scientific Editors and Mark Shelley for Scientific English editing. We are grateful to The Scripps Research Institute Flow Cytometry core for assistance with cell sorting and to Dr. Robin Willenbring for multiple discussions/advice on FACS data analysis.

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Eye Institute Grants 5 R01 EY026202 and 1 R01 EY028983 to H.P.M.

Materiały

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Biosafety CabinetSterilCard Baker19669.1Class II type A/B3
10 mL Disposable serological pipetsVWR89130-910Manufactured from polystyrene and are supplied sterile and plugged
10 mL Disposable serological pipetsVWR89130-908Manufactured from polystyrene and are supplied sterile and plugged
15 mL High-clarity polypropylene conical tubesFalcon352196
25 mL Disposable serological pipetsVWR89130-900Manufactured from polystyrene and are supplied sterile and plugged
5 mL FACS round-bottom tubesFisher Scientific, Falcon14-959-11A
50 mL High-clarity polypropylene conical tubesFalcon352070
Antibiotic-antimycoticInvitrogen15240-062
Appropriate filter and non-filter tipsAny availableAny available
BD Insulin SyringesBecton Dickinson328468with BD Ultra-Fine needle ½ mL 8 mm 31 G
BD Syringes 10 mLBecton Dickinson309604Sterile
Brilliant Violet 421 anti mouse CD326 (EpCAM)Biolegend118225Monoclonal Antibody (G8.8)
CaCl2 1M solutionBioVisionB1010sterile
Cell culture dishes 35 mmCorning430165Non-pyrogenic, sterile
Collagenase Type IWortingtonLS004194
Corn oilAny avaliableAny avaliableFrom grocery store
Corning cell strainer size 70 μmSigma-AldrichCLS431751-50EA
Digital Stirrer PC-410DCorningItem# UX-84302-50
Dispase IISigma-AldrichD4693-1G
Dissecting scissors, curved bluntMcKesson Argent487350Metzenbaum 5-1/2 Inch surgical grade stainless steel non-sterile finger ring handle
DNase IAkron Biotech, catalog numberAK37778-0050
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium – low glucose (DMEM)Sigma-AldrichD5546-500MLwith 1,000 mg/L glucose and sodium bicarbonate, without L-glutamine
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium/F12 (DMEM/F12)MilliporeDF-042-Bwithout HEPES, L-glutamine
Easypet 3 pipette controllerEppendorf4430000018with 2 membrane filters 0.45 µm, 0.1 – 100 mL
EthanolSigma-AldrichE7023-500ML
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)Sigma-AldrichE6758
Fisher Vortex Genie 2Fisher Scientific12-812
FlowJo version 10Any availableAny available
Fluorescence binocular microscope Axioplan2Carl ZeissID# 094207
Ghost Red 780 Viability DyeTonbo Biosciences13-0865-T100
GlutaMAX SupplementThermoFisher Scientific, Gibco35050061
Glycerol 99%Sigma-AldrichG-5516
Hand tally counterHeathrow ScientificHEA6594
Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS)Sigma MilliporeH6648-500MLModified, with sodium bicarbonate, without calcium chloride, magnesium sulphate, phenol red.
Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS)ThermoFisher Scientific14025092With calcium, magnesium, no phenol red.
Hausser Bright-Line Phase HemocytometerFisher Scientific02-671-51B02-671-51B
HEPES 1 M solutionThermoFisher Scientific, Gibco15630-080Dilute 1/10 in ddH20
HyClone Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)Fisher ScientificSH3007002E
Hydrochloric Acid (HCl), 5 N Volumetric SolutionJT Baker5618-03To adjust Tris buffer pH
Innova 4230 Refrigerated Benchtop IncubatorNew Brunswick ScientificSKU#:Shaker; 37 °C, 5% CO2 in air
Iris scissorsAurora SurgicalAS12-021Pointed tips, delicate, curved, 9 cm, ring handle
Isoflurane Inhalation AnestheticSouthern Anesthesia Surgical (SAS)PIR001325-EA
MgCl2 1 M solutionSigma-Aldrich63069-100ML
Microcentrifuge tubes 1.5 mLThermoFisher Scientific3451Clear, graduated, sterile
Microsoft Power PointAny availableAny available
NaCl powderSigma-AldrichS-3014
Nalgene 25 mm Syringe FiltersFisher Scientific724-2020
Pen StrepGibco15140-122
pH 510 series Benchtop MeterOaktonSKU: BZA630092
Phosphate buffered saline (PBS)ThermoFisher Scientific10010023pH 7.4
Pure Ethanol 200 ProofPharmco-Aaper111000200
Red blood cell lysis buffer 10xBioVision5831-100
Roto-torque Heavy Duty RotatorCole ParmerMPN: 7637-01
Safe-lock round bottom Eppendorf tubes 2 mLEppendorf Biopur22600044PCR inhibitor, pyrogen and RNAse-free
ScissorsOffice Depot375667
Sorting flow cytometer MoFlo Astrios EQBeckman CoulterB25982With Summit 6.3 software
Sorvall Legend Micro 17R MicrocentrifugeThermo Scientific75002441All centrifugation performed at RT
Sorvall RT7 Plus Benchtop Refrigerated CentrifugeThermo ScientificID# 21550RTH-750 Rotor. All centrifugation performed at RT
Stemi SV6 stereo dissecting microscopeCarl Zeiss455054SV6With transmitted light base
TamoxifenMillipore SigmaT5648-1G
Trizma base powderSigma-AldrichT1503
Trypan blue solutionMillipore SigmaT8154
Two Dumont tweezers #5World Precision Instruments50034211 cm, Straight, 0.1 mm x 0.06 mm tips
Upright microscopeAny availableAny availableWith transmitted light base
Vacuum filtration systems, standard lineVWR10040-436
Variable volume micropipettesAny availableAny available

Odniesienia

  1. Makarenkova, H. P., Dartt, D. A. Myoepithelial Cells: Their Origin and Function in Lacrimal Gland Morphogenesis, Homeostasis, and Repair. Current Molecular Biology Reports. 1 (3), 115-123 (2015).
  2. Haaksma, C. J., Schwartz, R. J., Tomasek, J. J. Myoepithelial cell contraction and milk ejection are impaired in mammary glands of mice lacking smooth muscle alpha-actin. Biology Of Reproduction. 85 (1), 13-21 (2011).
  3. Siedlecki, J., et al. Combined VEGF/PDGF inhibition using axitinib induces alphaSMA expression and a pro-fibrotic phenotype in human pericytes. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. , (2018).
  4. Fritz, M. E., LaVeau, P., Nahmias, A. J., Weigel, R. J., Lee, F. Primary cultures of feline acinar cells: dissociation, culturing, and viral infection. American Journal of Physiology. 239 (4), G288-G294 (1980).
  5. Hann, L. E., Tatro, J. B., Sullivan, D. A. Morphology and function of lacrimal gland acinar cells in primary culture. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 30 (1), 145-158 (1989).
  6. Cripps, M. M., Bromberg, B. B., Bennett, D. J., Welch, M. H. Structure and function of non-enzymatically dissociated lacrimal gland acini. Current Eye Research. 10 (11), 1075-1080 (1991).
  7. Zoukhri, D., Hodges, R. R., Rawe, I. M., Dartt, D. A. Ca2+ signaling by cholinergic and alpha1-adrenergic agonists is up-regulated in lacrimal and submandibular glands in a murine model of Sjogren's syndrome. Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology. 89 (2), 134-140 (1998).
  8. Pringle, S., Nanduri, L. S., van der Zwaag, M., van Os, R., Coppes, R. P. Isolation of mouse salivary gland stem cells. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (48), (2011).
  9. Shatos, M. A., Haugaard-Kedstrom, L., Hodges, R. R., Dartt, D. A. Isolation and characterization of progenitor cells in uninjured, adult rat lacrimal gland. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53 (6), 2749-2759 (2012).
  10. Ackermann, P., et al. Isolation and Investigation of Presumptive Murine Lacrimal Gland Stem Cells. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56 (8), 4350-4363 (2015).
  11. Gromova, A., et al. Lacrimal Gland Repair Using Progenitor Cells. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 6 (1), 88-98 (2017).
  12. Hawley, D., et al. Myoepithelial cell-driven acini contraction in response to oxytocin receptor stimulation is impaired in lacrimal glands of Sjogren's syndrome animal models. Scientific Reports. 8 (1), 9919 (2018).
  13. Matic, I., et al. Quiescent Bone Lining Cells Are a Major Source of Osteoblasts During Adulthood. Stem Cells. 34 (12), 2930-2942 (2016).
  14. Bond, M. D., Van Wart, H. E. Characterization of the individual collagenases from Clostridium histolyticum. Biochemistry. 23 (13), 3085-3091 (1984).
  15. Eckhard, U., Schonauer, E., Brandstetter, H. Structural basis for activity regulation and substrate preference of clostridial collagenases. G, H, and T. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 288 (28), 20184-20194 (2013).
  16. Breggia, A. C., Himmelfarb, J. Primary mouse renal tubular epithelial cells have variable injury tolerance to ischemic and chemical mediators of oxidative stress. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 1 (1), 33-38 (2008).
  17. Mueller, S. O., Clark, J. A., Myers, P. H., Korach, K. S. Mammary gland development in adult mice requires epithelial and stromal estrogen receptor alpha. Endocrinology. 143 (6), 2357-2365 (2002).
  18. Guthmiller, J. J., Zander, R. A., Butler, N. S. Measurement of the T Cell Response to Preerythrocytic Vaccination in Mice. Methods in Molecular Biology. 1325, 19-37 (2015).
  19. Seime, T., et al. Inducible cell labeling and lineage tracking during fracture repair. Development, Growth & Differentiation. 57 (1), 10-23 (2015).
  20. Hawley, D., et al. RNA-Seq and CyTOF immuno-profiling of regenerating lacrimal glands identifies a novel subset of cells expressing muscle-related proteins. PLoS One. 12 (6), e0179385 (2017).
  21. Tata, A., et al. Myoepithelial Cells of Submucosal Glands Can Function as Reserve Stem Cells to Regenerate Airways after Injury. Cell Stem Cell. 22 (5), 668-683 (2018).
  22. Song, E. C., et al. Genetic and scRNA-seq Analysis Reveals Distinct Cell Populations that Contribute to Salivary Gland Development and Maintenance. Scientific Reports. 8 (1), 14043 (2018).
  23. Knight, A. n. d. r. e. w. W., B, N. Distinguishing GFP from cellular autofluorescence. Biophotonics International. 8 (7), 7 (2001).
  24. Januszyk, M., et al. Evaluating the Effect of Cell Culture on Gene Expression in Primary Tissue Samples Using Microfluidic-Based Single Cell Transcriptional Analysis. Microarrays (Basel). 4 (4), 540-550 (2015).

Przedruki i uprawnienia

Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE

Zapytaj o uprawnienia

Przeglądaj więcej artyków

Myoepithelial CellsIsolation ProtocolLacrimal GlandsSubmandibular GlandsSmooth Muscle CellsPericytesGene Expression StudiesAlpha Smooth Muscle ActinTamoxifenSingle cell SuspensionFluorescent MicroscopyDigestion MediumTissue ProcessingExocrine GlandsCell Surface Markers

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Prywatność

Warunki Korzystania

Zasady

Badania

Edukacja

O JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone