Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
* Wspomniani autorzy wnieśli do projektu równy wkład.
Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) are a powerful tool in translational cancer research, reflecting both the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of the disease and response to personalized anti-cancer therapies. Here, a consolidated protocol to generate human primary bladder cancer PDOs in preparation for the evaluation of phenotypic analyses and drug responses is detailed.
Current in vitro therapeutic testing platforms lack relevance to tumor pathophysiology, typically employing cancer cell lines established as two-dimensional (2D) cultures on tissue culture plastic. There is a critical need for more representative models of tumor complexity that can accurately predict therapeutic response and sensitivity. The development of three-dimensional (3D) ex vivo culture of patient-derived organoids (PDOs), derived from fresh tumor tissues, aims to address these shortcomings. Organoid cultures can be used as tumor surrogates in parallel to routine clinical management to inform therapeutic decisions by identifying potential effective interventions and indicating therapies that may be futile. Here, this procedure aims to describe strategies and a detailed step-by-step protocol to establish bladder cancer PDOs from fresh, viable clinical tissue. Our well-established, optimized protocols are practical to set up 3D cultures for experiments using limited and diverse starting material directly from patients or patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumor material. This procedure can also be employed by most laboratories equipped with standard tissue culture equipment. The organoids generated using this protocol can be used as ex vivo surrogates to understand both the molecular mechanisms underpinning urological cancer pathology and to evaluate treatments to inform clinical management.
Bladder cancer is the most prevalent urinary tract cancer and the tenth most common human malignancy worldwide1. It encompasses a genetically diverse and phenotypically complex spectrum of disease2. Urothelial non-muscle-invasive forms of bladder cancer (NMIBC) are the most common bladder cancer diagnoses (70%-80%), and these cancers display considerable biological heterogeneity and variable clinical outcomes2,3,4. Patients with NMIBC typically experience a high risk of disease recurrence (50-70%) and one-third of cancers will progress and develop into significantly more aggressive muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)2. Although 5-year survival rates for NMIBC are high (>90%), these patients must undergo long-term clinical management5. On the other hand, locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic MIBC is generally considered incurable6. Consequently, bladder cancer has one of the highest lifetime treatment costs within cancer care and is a significant burden for both the individual and the healthcare system3,7. The underlying genetic aberrations in advanced disease renders therapeutic management of bladder cancer a clinical challenge, and therapeutic options for invasive urothelial tumors have only recently improved since the approval of immunotherapies for both advanced and high-risk NMIBC8,9. Currently, clinical decision-making has been guided by conventional clinical and histopathological features, despite individual bladder cancer tumors showing large differences in disease aggressiveness and response to therapy10. There is an urgent need to accelerate research into clinically useful models to improve the prediction of individual patient prognosis and identification of effective treatments.
Three-dimensional (3D) organoids show great potential as tumor models due to their ability to self-organize and recapitulate the original tumor's intrinsic in vivo architecture and pharmacogenomic profile, and their capability to mirror the native cellular functionality of the original tissue from which they were derived11,12,13. Although established bladder cancer cell lines are readily available, relatively cost-effective, scalable, and simple to manipulate, the in vitro cell lines largely fail to mimic the spectrum of diverse genetic and epigenetic alterations observed in clinical bladder cancers12,14 and were all established and maintained under 2D, adherent culture conditions. Additionally, cell lines derived from primary and metastatic bladder tumors harbor significant genetic divergence from the original tumor material. 8,15.
An alternative approach is to use genetically engineered and carcinogen-induced mouse models. However, while these models recapitulate some of the natural oncogenic cascades involved in human neoplasia (reviewed in refs16,17,18), they lack tumor heterogeneity, are expensive, poorly represent invasive and metastatic bladder cancer, and are not viable for rapid term drug testing as tumors can take many months to develop14,19. Patient-derived models of cancer (including organoids, conditionally reprogrammed primary cell culture, and xenografts) provide invaluable opportunities to understand the effects of drug treatment before clinical treatment20. Despite this, few groups routinely use these patient-proximal models due to limited access to fresh primary patient tissue and the extensive optimization required to reproducibly generate patient-derived organoid (PDO) culture conditions. In an in vivo setting, oncogenic cells can interact and communicate with various compositions of the surrounding constituents, including stromal cells, tissue infiltrating immune cells, and matrix12. Similarly, for PDOs grown in a 3D format, cellular/matrix complexity can be customized to include other relevant components. PDOs can be rapidly generated and are often able to be passaged extensively or cryopreserved for later use, despite having a finite lifespan21,22,23. Pharmacodynamics (i.e., response to a drug) can be evaluated using multiple read-outs, including organoid viability and morphology, and characterization of immunohistochemistry targets or transcriptional changes.
Here, the procedures for the establishment of bladder cancer organoids from patient material collected from transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) or surgical removal of the bladder (radical cystectomy) are described. The method to generate PDOs is illustrated, using readily available wet laboratory materials and tools. Endpoints include changes in cell morphological characteristics and viability. These were measured using fluorescence microscopy, in vitro viability (metabolic and cell membrane integrity) assays, and histopathological analysis. Figure 1 shows the workflow for establishing human bladder cancer PDOs from clinical material obtained during elective surgery.
Patients have consented to this study following their admission under the Urology team at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. This study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and within ethical and institutional guidelines (ethics number HREC/05/QPAH/95, QUT 1000001165).
NOTE: As eligibility criteria, patients were aged ≥ 18 with cancer, and able to understand and provide consent. Those who were not able to give informed consent were excluded. Those having a primary language other than English were excluded as the provision of interpreters was not possible due to logistical and budgetary considerations. Also excluded were patients whose tumors were not accessible to biopsy or unlikely to be available in adequate amount after routine pathology.
1. Organoid Medium Preparation
NOTE: Human bladder cancer organoid medium requires growth factors that aid in the survival, growth, and continuous expansion of organoids derived from dissociated clinical material (Table 1). For complete details of each supplement used in this procedure, please refer to the Table of Materials.
2. A day before procedure outlined in 3
3. Generation of bladder tumor organoids
NOTE: This is an initial step for PDO establishment from primary patient tumors. This procedure is adapted for bladder cancer tissues from methods established by Gao et al.24.
3D organoids were successfully established from human bladder cancer patient TURBT and cystectomy tissues. Briefly, this technique highlights a rapid formation of 3D multicellular structures that are both viable and suitable for other endpoint analyses such as histological evaluation, molecular characterization (by immunohistochemistry or quantitative real-time PCR), and drug screening. During the procedure (Figure 1), the various eluates during our filtration phases (Fi...
While 3D organoid protocols derived from bladder cancer tissue are still in their infancy, they are an area of active research and clinical investigation. Here, an optimized protocol to successfully establish bladder cancer PDOs that are suitable for both NMIBC and MIBC specimens is detailed. This workflow integrates parallelly into hospital-based clinical trials and considers biobank sample accrual, including histological sample processing and fresh frozen tissue banking, which is an important consideration for clinical...
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
We acknowledge the technical assistance of the Translational Research Institute Histology core and Biological Resource Facility. This research was supported by funding from a Princess Alexandra Research Foundation award (I.V., E.D.W.), and the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) Rapid Applied Research Translation Program (Centre for Personalised Analysis of Cancers (CPAC; E.D.W., I.V.). The Translational Research Institute receives support from the Australian Government.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
1.2 mL cryogenic vial | Corning | 430487 | |
1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes | Sigma-Aldrich | T9661-500EA | polypropylene single-use tube |
100 µM reversible strainer | STEMCELL Technologies | #27270 | |
100 mm petri dish | Corning | 430167 | |
10x Collagenase/ Hyaluronidase | STEMCELL Technologies | #07912 | |
37 µM reversible strainer | STEMCELL Technologies | #27250 | |
37°C incubator | |||
37°C water bath | |||
50 mL falcon tube | Corning | CLS430829-500EA | |
6-well plate | Corning | CLS3516 | |
70% (w/w) ethanol | |||
-80°C freezer | |||
96 well ultra low attachment plate (Black) | Sigma-Aldrich | CLS3474-24EA | |
A 83-01 | BioScientific | 2939 | Prevents the growth-inhibitory effects of TGF-β |
ACK lysis buffer | STEMCELL Technologies | #07850 | |
adDMEM/F-12 | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 12634028 | Base medium |
Animal-free recombinant EGF | Sigma | 518179 | Growth factor |
Automated cell counter (TC20) | Bio-rad | 1450102 | |
B27 additive | Gibco | 17504044 | Increases sphere-forming efficiency |
Cell Counting Slides | Bio-rad | 1450015 | |
Centrifuge | Eppendorf | EP022628188 | |
Computer system | |||
CryoStor CS10 | STEMCELL Technologies | #07930 | Cell freezing solution |
Dispase II, powder | Thermofisher | 17105041 | To enzymatically disrupt Matrigel |
DNAse 1 | STEMCELL Technologies | #07900 | |
DPBS | Thermofisher | 14190144 | |
Dry and wet ice | |||
Esky | |||
Farmdyne (Iodine 16g/L) | Ecolab | ||
Formalin solution, neutral buffered, 10% | Sigma | HT501128 | Histological tissue fixative |
Glutamax (L-alanine-L-glutamine) | Invitrogen | 35050061 | Source of nitrogen for the synthesis of proteins, nucleic acids |
HEPES | Gibco | 15630-080 | All-purpose buffer |
Histology cassette | ProSciTech | RCH44-W | |
Human FGF-10 | Peprotech | 100-26-25 | Growth factor |
Human FGF-2 | Peprotech | 100-18B-50 | Growth factor |
Liquid nitrogen | |||
Matrigel (Growth Factor Reduced (GFR), phenol red-free, LDEV free) | In Vitro Technologies | 356231 | Basement membrane extract (BME) |
Mr. Frosty freezing container | ThermoFisher | 5100-0001 | cell freezing container |
N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) | Sigma | A7250 | Anti-oxidant required to protect against ROS-induced cytotoxicity |
Nicotinamide | Sigma | N0636-100G | SIRT-1 inhibitor |
NikonTs2U inverted microscope | Nikon | MFA510BB | |
NIS-Elements Advanced Research | Nikon | MQS31000 | |
Noggin conditioned media | In-house | BMP inhibitor | |
Pipetboy acu 2 | Integra | 155000 | |
Pipettes (p20, p100, p1000) with tips | |||
Primocin | Jomar Bioscience | ant-pm2 | Combination of antibacterial and antifungal compounds to protect cell cultures from contaminations |
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) | Tocris | 2296 | support proliferation of cells |
Rotary tube mixer | Ratek | RSM7DC | |
R-spondin 1 conditioned media | In-house | WNT signalling regulator | |
SB202190 | Jomar Bioscience | s1077-25mg | Selective p38 MAP kinase inhibitor |
Scale | |||
Scalpel handle | Livingstone | WBLDHDL03 | |
Scalpels, #11 blade | Medical and Surgical Requisites | EU-211-1 | |
Serological pipettes (5, 10, 25 mL) | |||
Specimen Waste Bags | Medical Search | SU09125X16 | |
Urine specimen jar | |||
Y27632 | Jomar Bioscience | s1049-10mg | Selective ROCK inhibitor. Increases survival of dissociated epithelial cells |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone