A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
In this manuscript, we describe percutaneous isolated hepatic perfusion with simultaneous chemofiltration as treatment for unresectable liver metastases. This procedure is performed under general anaesthesia in the angiosuite by an experienced team, consisting of an interventional radiologist, a clinical perfusionist and anaesthesiologist.
Unresectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer can be treated with systemic chemotherapy, aiming to limit the disease, extend survival or turn unresectable metastases into resectable ones. Some patients however, suffer from side effects or progression under systemic treatment. For patients with metastasized uveal melanoma there are no standard systemic therapy options. For patients without extrahepatic disease, isolated liver perfusion (IHP) may enable local disease control with limited systemic side effects. Previously, this was performed during open surgery with satisfying results, but morbidity and mortality related to the open procedure, prohibited a widespread application. Therefore, percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) with simultaneous chemofiltration was developed. Besides decreasing morbidity and mortality, this procedure can be repeated, hopefully leading to a higher response rate and improved survival (by local control of disease). During PHP, catheters are placed in the proper hepatic artery, to infuse the chemotherapeutic agent, and in the inferior caval vein to aspirate the chemosaturated blood returning through the hepatic veins. The caval vein catheter is a double balloon catheter that prohibits leakage into the systemic circulation. The blood returning from the hepatic veins is aspirated through the catheter fenestrations and then perfused through an extra-corporeal filtration system. After filtration, the blood is returned to the patient by a third catheter in the right internal jugular vein. During PHP a high dose of melphalan is infused into the liver, which is toxic and would lead to life threatening complications when administered systemically. Because of the significant hemodynamic instability resulting from the combination of caval vein occlusion and chemofiltration, hemodynamic monitoring and hemodynamic support is of paramount importance during this complex procedure.
Resection of malignant liver tumors is the first choice of treatment for both primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. However, a large proportion of patients are not candidates for surgery because of extended disease or location of the metastases. For patients with unresectable metastases from colorectal carcinoma, systemic therapy is often the preferred treatment. Hepatic metastases from uveal melanoma are often small and diffusely spread throughout the liver. No standard systemic therapy is available for this group of patients. Local therapy can be an alternative to systemic treatment, in case the metastases are confined to the liver.
Because of the specific vascular anatomy of the liver, this organ can be isolated from the systemic circulation. This allows perfusion of the liver with high dose chemotherapy (IHP, isolated hepatic perfusion). Besides, liver malignancies have a dominant or exclusive vascular supply from the hepatic artery, whereas 70-80% of the supply of the non-tumorous liver parenchyma is derived from the portal vein.1,2 This technique was developed over twenty years ago, to treat patients with unresectable metastases from various primary origins.3,4 Especially, uveal melanoma patients with metastases in the liver may be candidates for IHP because the metastases are often small and spread throughout the entire liver, and at present no standard systemic therapy is available.5,6
The principle of IHP is to temporarily isolate the liver from the systemic circulation and perfuse the organ with a high dose of chemotherapy, leading to high local drug exposure with limited systemic side effects.7 This high dose of chemotherapy would be toxic and lead to complications when administered systemically. The majority of IHP studies were performed with melphalan, and have investigated treatment of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer patients, as well as patients with uveal melanoma metastases.8,9 Several studies of IHP during open surgery suggest that this treatment might be effective: 50-59% tumor response rates (partial and complete response) for the treatment of colorectal cancer and a 68% tumor response rate for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma have been reported.8,10,11,12 Despite these treatment results, this procedure never gained wide acceptance, because of the complexity of the procedure, the duration of hospital stay and the associated morbidity and mortality.
Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) offers a minimal invasive alternative to IHP and was first demonstrated in a porcine model in 1993 using doxorubicin13 and the first in human trial was performed by Ravikumar et al. in 1994.14 Due to lack of evidence of efficacy, the technique was largely abandoned until the early 2000's when it was re-evaluated in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in the United States.15 During PHP, a catheter is placed percutaneous into the proper hepatic artery via the femoral artery to infuse the chemotherapeutic agent. A second catheter is placed in the inferior caval vein via the femoral vein to aspirate the hepatic chemosaturated outflow (see the PHP circuit in Figure 1). The isolation aspiration catheter placed in the caval vein is a double balloon catheter, prohibiting leakage into the systemic circulation. The aspirated chemosaturated blood is filtered by a double charcoal filter and returned to the patient by a third catheter placed in the internal jugular vein. The patient is admitted in the hospital with a length of stay of ~3 days. The PHP procedure is performed in an angiography room under general anaesthesia by a well-trained multidisciplinary team consisting of a dedicated interventional radiologist, anaesthesiologist and an extracorporeal perfusionist. A surgical oncologist and medical oncologist are also members of this multidisciplinary team, and especially focus on informing the patient, patient selection and post-operative care.
Figure 1. Schematic image of the PHP circuit. This figure displays the set-up of the PHP circuit. It shows an isolated hepatic perfusion circuit with extra-corporeal bypass line. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
This minimal invasive procedure is associated with less operative morbidity and can be repeated several times (at least up to 4 times). Besides, it only takes approximately 3 to 4 hr and patient recovery is fast. The advantage of PHP is the fact that all sizes of metastases can be treated, and micro metastases are being treated as well. Also the location of the metastases, close to vascular structures and bile ducts, is not a contraindication for PHP. Initial studies were performed with the 1st generation filter, with a 77% (mean) filter extraction efficiency.16 Recently, the results of a phase III trial were published by Hughes et al. showing a significant improvement of hepatic progression free survival in uveal melanoma patients with hepatic metastases treated with PHP compared to best alternative care.17
Since April 2012 a 2nd generation filter is available. In pre-clinical studies the 2nd generation filter is extracting 98% of melphalan. Several studies and case series investigating PHP for multiple indications have been published, but apart from the recent publishing phase III trial, survival has not extensively been analysed.16,18,19,20 In the present investigation, we focus on the interventional radiology procedure, as well as the anaesthetic management and the extra corporeal circulation that is used during this procedure in order to facilitate the use of this treatment in other medical centers.
Note: After a patient met all inclusion criteria and was carefully evaluated by a medical oncologist, surgeon and anaesthesiologist, a patient was included in the study. All patients provided written informed consent. Both clinical studies were approved by the Local Medical Ethics Committee of the Leiden University Medical Centre and are performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration.
1. Pre-procedural Angiography by Interventional Radiologist
2. PHP Procedure I: Preparation and Creating a Perfusion Circuit
Figure 2. Per-procedural angiogram. Venous double balloon catheter in the inferior caval vein and arterial infusion catheter in the proper hepatic artery. Retrograde contrast is injected via the venous catheter. Coils from the pre-procedural angiography and embolization are in place. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. PHP Procedure II: Infusion of Chemotherapy and Washout Period
Knowledge about PHP is based on small phase I and II trials and case series and a recent larger phase trial III; an overview of published results is shown in Table 1. One paper discusses the anaesthesiology procedure, hemodynamic and metabolic aspects of the treatment. However, no survival data were reported.22 Three larger trials that were reported, included metastatic liver disease from different primary tumors and the results are therefore difficult to inter...
Patients with unresectable liver metastases can be treated with systemic therapy. However, for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma, no standard systemic therapy is available and immunotherapy or targeted therapy have not yet been able to show improved survival. Isolated hepatic perfusion has been shown to be an effective treatment for patients with unresectable uveal melanoma metastases confined to the liver.9,28 For colorectal cancer metastases more therapeutic systemic options are available, but some pat...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors have no acknowledgements.
The phase II study is financially supported by Delcath Systems.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Delcath 2nd Generation Hepatic CHEMOSAT Delivery System | Delcath Systems Inc., New York, New York, USA | 602001 and 602002 | Item no. 1 |
Isofuse Isolation Aspiration Catheter (Double Balloon Catheter) | Delcath Systems Inc., New York, New York, USA | Item no. 1a | |
10F Venous Return Catheter | Delcath Systems Inc., New York, New York, USA | ||
Hemofiltration Cartridges | Delcath Systems Inc., New York, New York, USA | Item no. 1b | |
Circuit components | Delcath Systems Inc., New York, New York, USA | ||
Level-1 rapid fluid management system | Smiths Medical | Item no. 2 | |
22 G arterial line | Arrow International Inc. / Teleflex Inc.,Dublin, Ireland | Item no. 3 | |
Vigileo, Monitor | Edwards Lifesciences Corp, Irvine, California, USA | Item no. 4 | |
7.5F Triple lumen intravenous catheter, 20 cm | Vygon, Valkenswaard, Nederland | Item no. 5 | |
5F sheath | Item no. 6 | ||
2.7 Progreat microcatheter | Terumo, Tokyo, Japan | MC-PP27131 | Item no. 7 |
18F sheath | Item no. 8 | ||
Auto-injector Medrad Mark V ProVis | Bayer, Indianola, Pennsylvania, USA | Not available anymore, replaced by Medrad Mark 7 Arterion Injection System | Item no. 9 |
Melphalan | Alkeran, Aspen Pharmacare, Dublin, Ireland | Item no. 10 | |
Heparin LEO, 5,000 IE/ml | LEO Pharma AB, Denmark | Item no. 11 | |
Centrifugal pump | Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota, VS | Item no. 12 | |
Voluven colloid solution (6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in 0.9% sodium chloride injection) | Item no. 13 | ||
Iopromide 300, Ultravist | Bayer, Indianola, Pennsylvania, USA | Item no. 14 | |
Detachable coil, Interlock | Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA | Item no. 15 | |
Vascular plug, Amplatzer 4 | St. Jude Medical, St Paul,Minnesota, USA | Item no. 16 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved