A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
Here, we present a protocol to isolate microglia from postnatal mouse pups (day 1) for in vitro experimentation. This improvised method of isolation generates both high yield and purity, a significant advantage over alternate methods that allows broad range experimentation for the purposes of elucidating microglial biology.
Microglia are the primary responders to central nervous system insults; however, much remains unknown about their role in regulating neuroinflammation. Microglia are mesodermal cells that function similarly to macrophages in surveying inflammatory stress. The classical (M1-type) and alternative (M2-type) activations of macrophages have also been extended to microglia in an effort to better understand the underlying interplay these phenotypes have in neuroinflammatory conditions such as Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, and Huntington's Diseases. In vitro experimentation utilizing primary microglia offers rapid and reliable results that may be extended to the in vivo environment. Although this is a clear advantage over in vivo experimentation, isolating microglia while achieving adequate yields of optimal purity has been a challenge. Common methods currently in use either suffer from low recovery, low purity, or both. Herein, we demonstrate a refinement of the column-free CD11b magnetic separation method that achieves a high cell recovery and enhanced purity in half the amount of time. We propose this optimized method as a highly useful model of primary microglial isolation for the purposes of studying neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration.
Microglia are Myb-independent resident macrophages of mesodermal origin, which differentiate from c-kit+/CD45- erythromyeloid progenitors in the blood islands of the yolk sac1,2. Once embryological microglia have colonized the central nervous system (CNS), they transition from an amoeboid to a ramified form3. These adult microglia are classified as surveillant since their dynamic ramifications probe the healthy brain parenchyma for potential insults4. Although microglia only contribute to approximately 10% of the CNS cell population, their ability to tile amongst each other ensures maximal scanning of the parenchyma4,5. Danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), such as α-synuclein6,7 and amyloid-β8, or pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS)9, classically activate microglia to promote an inflammatory response characterized by reversion to the amoeboid active state and the production of nitric oxide, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-6, IL-12, and the chemokine C-C motif ligand 29,10,11. In neuroinflammatory conditions such as Parkinson's disease, in which pathogenic α-synuclein has accumulated, a neurodegenerative cycle is created from the death of dopaminergic neurons, which release more aggregated α-synuclein, further promoting classical activation of microglia7. Similar to peripheral macrophages, microglia may also have the ability to alternatively activate in the presence of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4 and IL-10, giving them the potential of promoting neural repair and attenuating inflammation2,11. Aside from their immunological roles in the CNS, microglia have been described as vital regulators of neuronal circuitry by pruning synapses during development. For example, Cx3cr1-KO mice have less dense microglia and reduced synaptic pruning, which leads to an overabundance of dendritic spines, immature synapses, and the electrophysiological patterns of an underdeveloped CNS12. Understanding these physiological complexities and the diverse functional roles of microglia in the homeostasis of the CNS is critical to the search for therapeutics targeting neurodegenerative disorders.
In the area of neuroimmunology, in vitro experiments are highly desirable because of the greater feasibility for mechanistic studies, the lower maintenance costs, and for being less time- and labor-intensive. Furthermore, the ability to isolate cell populations is critical to delineate the functionality of those target cells under prescribed conditions. Numerous microglial isolation methods exist, but they are limited by their ability to obtain relatively high numbers and purity for broad experimentation13,14,15. For example, a cluster of differentiation 11b (CD11b) is a common surface marker of monocytes, macrophages, and microglia16. By exploiting CD11b, a method of magnetic separation was first described as a column-based approach that yielded ~99.5% purity and ~1.6 x 106 microglia per neonatal brain17. Our laboratory recently developed a column-free CD11b magnetic separation method15, which we performed in a polystyrene tube by tagging CD11b with a monoclonal antibody conjugated to phycoerythrin (PE). A bispecific secondary antibody to PE and dextran complexes with the PE. Once bound, dextran-coated magnetic particles are introduced, which bind to the dextran end of the antibody complex. Lastly, the polystyrene tube is placed in a magnet for microglial isolation. This approach doubled the yield to ~3.2 x 106 microglia per neonatal brain but at the cost of reducing purity to ~97%.
Herein, we demonstrate a rapid and refined column-free CD11b magnetic separation protocol (Figure 1). This improved method remains as feasible as our original column-free method since the price of the CD11b magnetic separation kit is the same. The completion time is reduced in half, which can be crucial to maximizing cell survival and yield. Notably, the purity achieved from this optimized method is ~>99%, a marked improvement over the purity achieved from the original column-free method developed by our laboratory15. Most importantly, CD11b-PE is not utilized, eliminating the need to incubate away from light and allowing the use of the red channel for fluorescence microscopy. Lastly, as in the original CD11b method, an astrocytic fraction of high yield and purity is obtained with this improved method. Astrocytes are the most numerous glial cells in the CNS, leading to the idea that their homeostatic functions are indispensable in relation to pathophysiology18. These glial cells play a role in diverse physiological functions such as forming the blood-brain barrier, providing nutrient support, maintaining neurotransmitter homeostasis, forming glial scars in response to injury, neuroprotection, learning and memory, and neuroinflammation, exemplifying their investigatory potential in glial biology19. Morphology and functionality of microglia and astrocytes have been ascertained via confocal microscopy, Western blotting, quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR), Griess nitrite assay, and the Luminex multiplex cytokine assay. The refinement provided by this protocol offers increased confidence pertaining to microglial or astrocytic purity, broader application of fluorescence microscopy with the availability of the red channel, and saves time, all of which are important for in vitro experimentation.
Use of the animals and protocol procedures were approved and supervised by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Iowa State University (Ames, IA, USA)
1. Growing of Mixed Glial Cultures
2. Isolation of Microglial Cells
Microglia isolated using CD11b Positive Selection kit II have high purity
Primary mouse microglia were isolated using the above mentioned protocol and plated on poly-D-lysine-coated coverslips to check the purity of isolation. Ten thousand cells were plated per well and immunocytochemical analysis was performed using ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1) as a marker of microglia and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP...
Older microglial isolation methods have limited recoveries that are not appropriate for various protein analyses by Western blot and RNA analyses by qRT-PCR. The differential adherence and mild trypsinization methods are two common approaches with low microglial yields13,14,15. The column-based CD11b approach also has low recovery, but achieves greater purity than differential adherence and mild trypsinization1...
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants: NS088206 and ES026892. The W. Eugene and Linda Lloyd Endowed Chair to AGK and Deans Professorship to AK are also acknowledged.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
EasySep CD11b Separation Kit II | StemCell Technologies | 18970 | |
EasySep Magnet | StemCell Technologies | 18000 | |
DMEM/F12 (1:1) (1x) | Life Technologies | 11330057 | |
Sodium Pyruvate | Life Technologies | 11360070 | |
MEM Non-essential amino acids (100x) | Life Technologies | 11140050 | |
L-Glutamine (100x) | Life Technologies | 25030081 | |
EDTA | Fisher Scientific | AM9260G | |
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) | Sigma | 13H469 | |
0.25% Trypsin-EDTA | Gibco by Life Technologies | 25200 | |
Dulbecco's PBS (DPBS) | Gibco by Life Technologies | 14190250 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved