JoVE Logo
Faculty Resource Center

Sign In

Summary

Abstract

Introduction

Protocol

Representative Results

Discussion

Acknowledgements

Materials

References

Chemistry

Negative Additive Manufacturing of Complex Shaped Boron Carbides

Published: September 18th, 2018

DOI:

10.3791/58438

1Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

A method called negative additive manufacturing is used to produce near fully dense complex shaped boron carbide parts of various length scales. This technique is possible via the formulation of a novel suspension involving resorcinol-formaldehyde as a unique gelling agent that leaves behind a homogenous carbon sintering aid after pyrolysis.

Boron carbide (B4C) is one of the hardest materials in existence. However, this attractive property also limits its machineability into complex shapes for high wear, high hardness, and lightweight material applications such as armors. To overcome this challenge, negative additive manufacturing (AM) is employed to produce complex geometries of boron carbides at various length scales. Negative AM first involves gelcasting a suspension into a 3D-printed plastic mold. The mold is then dissolved away, leaving behind a green body as a negative copy. Resorcinol-formaldehyde (RF) is used as a novel gelling agent because unlike traditional hydrogels, there is little to no shrinkage, which allows for extremely complex molds to be used. Furthermore, this gelling agent can be pyrolyzed to leave behind ~50 wt% carbon, which is a highly effective sintering aid for B4C. Due to this highly homogenous distribution of in situ carbon within the B4C matrix, less than 2% porosity can be achieved after sintering. This protocol highlights in detail the methodology for creating near fully dense boron carbide parts with highly complex geometries.

Boron carbide (B4C), with a Vickers hardness of about 38 GPa, is known as the third hardest commercially available material, behind diamond (~115 GPa) and cubic boron nitride (~48 GPa). This particular property, along with a low density (2.52 g/cm3), makes it attractive for defense applications such as armors1. B4C also has a high melting point, superior wear resistance, and high neutron absorption cross section2,3,4. However, utilization of these favorable mechanical properties typically requires B4C to be s....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

CAUTION: Please consult with the safety data sheets (SDS) of all materials, and wear proper protective equipment (PPE) when handling materials before casting and curing. Resorcinol and polyethylene imine are known to be toxic. Formaldehyde is both toxic and carcinogenic20. Preparation of ceramic suspensions should be done in chemical fume hoods or other properly ventilated work environments.

1. Negative Additive Manufacturing

  1. Preparation of a 120 mL .......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Following the outlined procedure (Figure 1), complex shaped boron carbide parts with carbon (B4C/C) can be sintered up to 97.6 ± 0.4% of theoretical max density with a Vicker's hardness of 23.0 ± 1.8 GPa8. Several possible examples of sintered B4C/C parts are demonstrated (Figure 2). These examples show the fine textural features that can be copied by the gelcasting tech.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

The methodology of negative additive manufacturing described in the protocol allows complex shaped boron carbide parts to be produced at nearly full density after sintering at an optimal temperature of 2290 °C. The first several steps related to preparation and casting are the most critical for generating a high-quality cast with minimal defects. If the viscosity of the suspension is too high, poor mixing will occur. The porosity of the sintered part is also affected since increased viscosity hinders air bubble remo.......

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. IM release LLNL-JRNL-750634.

....

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Name Company Catalog Number Comments
Boron carbide powder 1250F Tetrabor Ceramics Lot 211M419 >96% purity
Boron carbide powder 1500F Tetrabor Ceramics Lot 209M102/9 >96% purity
Boron carbide powder 3000F Tetrabor Ceramics Lot 111m53/9  >96% purity
Polyethylene Imine (PEI) Sigma Aldrich MKBP3417V Averaged MW ~25,000 by L.S. 
Resorcinol Sigma Aldrich MKBG6751V BioXtra, ≥99%
Formaldehyde Fisher Scientific F79-1 37% by weight; Stabilized with 10-15% Methanol
Acetic Acid Sigma Aldrich SKU 695092 Glacial ≥99.7%
Acetone Sigma Aldrich SKU 179124 ACS Reagent Grade ≥99.5%
Water LLNL In-house (Milli-Q)
Planetary Mixer Thinky AR-250 Fits 150mL and 300mL Thinky containers
Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic filament eSUN Natural color
Taz 6 (3D printer) Lulzbot FDM 3D printer
4%H2/96%Ar gas Air Gas UHP 4% Hydrogen, balanced Argon
Helium gas Air Gas UHP Helium
Heating oven Neytech Vulcan 9493308 Oven for 80 °C curing
Quartz tube furnace Applied Test Systems, Inc.  LEA 05-000075 Furnace for 1050 °C carbonization
Graphite furnace Thermal Technology LLC Sintering furnace
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Jeol JSM-7401F
pH meter Thermo Scientific Orion 4 Star calibrated with buffer standards
Rheometer TA Instrument AR2000ex For measurement of viscosity
X-ray Diffractometer (XRD) Bruker AX D8 Advanced
Analytical balance Mettler Toledo XS104
Bruker EVA  XRD Analysis Software

  1. An, Q. Prediction of superstrong τ -boron carbide phase from quantum mechanics. Physical Review B. 95 (10), 100101 (2017).
  2. Thévenot, F. Boron carbide - A comprehensive review. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 6, 205-225 (1990).
  3. Lee, H., Speyer, R. F. Pressureless sintering of boron carbide. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 86, 1468-1473 (2003).
  4. Deng, J. X. Erosion wear of boron carbide ceramic nozzles by abrasive air-jets. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 408, 227-233 (2005).
  5. Schwetz, K. A., Grellner, W. The influence of carbon on the microstructure and mechanical properties of sintered boron-carbide. Journal of Less-Common Metals. 82, 37-47 (1981).
  6. Schwetz, K. A., Vogt, G. Process for the production of dense sintered shaped articles of polycrystalline boron carbide by pressureless sintering. US. , (1980).
  7. Suzuki, H., Hase, T., Maruyama, T. Effect of carbon on sintering of boron carbide. Journal of the Ceramic Association, Japan. 87, 430-433 (1979).
  8. Lu, R., et al. Complex shaped boron carbides from negative additive manufacturing. Materials & Design. 148, 8-16 (2018).
  9. Omatete, O. O., Janney, M. A., Nunn, S. D. Gelcasting: From laboratory development toward industrial production. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 17, 407-413 (1997).
  10. Yang, J., Yu, J., Huang, Y. Recent developments in gelcasting of ceramics. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 31, 2569-2591 (2011).
  11. Gilissen, R., Erauw, J. P., Smolders, A., Vanswijgenhoven, E., Luyten, J. Gelcasting a near net shape technique. Materials & Design. 21, 251-257 (2000).
  12. Travitzky, N., et al. Additive manufacturing of ceramic-based materials. Advanced Engineering Materials. 16, 729-754 (2014).
  13. Zocca, A., Colombo, P., Gomes, C. M., Gunster, J. Additive Manufacturing of Ceramics: Issues, Potentialities, and Opportunities. Journal of the American Ceramic Society. 98, 1983-2001 (2015).
  14. Deckers, J., Vleugels, J., Kruthl, J. P. Additive Manufacturing of Ceramics: A Review. Journal of Ceramic Science and Technology. 5, 245-260 (2014).
  15. Costakis, W. J., Rueschhoff, L. M., Diaz-Cano, A. I., Youngblood, J. P., Trice, R. W. Additive manufacturing of boron carbide via continuous filament direct ink writing of aqueous ceramic suspensions. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 36, 3249-3256 (2016).
  16. Colombo, P., Schmidt, J., Franchin, G., Zocca, A., Gunster, J. Additive manufacturing techniques for fabricating complex ceramic components from preceramic polymers. American Ceramic Society Bulletin. 96, 16-23 (2017).
  17. Olsson, A., Hellsing, M. S., Rennie, A. R. New possibilities using additive manufacturing with materials that are difficult to process and with complex structures. Physica Scripta. 92, 053002 (2017).
  18. Dhara, S., Kamboj, R. K., Pradhan, M., Bhargava, P. Shape forming of ceramics via gelcasting of aqueous particulate slurries. Bulletin of Materials Science. 25, 565-568 (2002).
  19. Lewicki, J. P., Fox, C. A., Worsley, M. A. On the synthesis and structure of resorcinol-formaldehyde polymeric networks - Precursors to 3D-carbon macroassemblies. Polymer. 69, 45-51 (2015).
  20. Swenberg, J. A., et al. Formaldehyde Carcinogenicity Research: 30 Years and Counting for Mode of Action, Epidemiology, and Cancer Risk Assessment. Toxicologic Pathology. 41, 181-189 (2013).
  21. Kuo, C. C., Chen, C. M., Chang, S. X. Polishing mechanism for ABS parts fabricated by additive manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 91, 1473-1479 (2017).
  22. Kires, M. Archimedes' principle in action. Physics Education. 42, 484-487 (2007).
  23. Zheng, X., et al. Design and optimization of a light-emitting diode projection micro-stereolithography three-dimensional manufacturing system. Review of Scientific Instruments. 83, 125001 (2012).
  24. Franchin, G., Colombo, P. Porous Geopolymer Components through Inverse Replica of 3D Printed Sacrificial Templates. Journal of Ceramic Science and Technology. 6, 105-111 (2015).

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved