A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
An experimental methodology based on thermal and rheological measurements is proposed to characterize the curing process of adhesives with to obtain useful information for industrial adhesive selection.
The analysis of thermal processes associated to the curing of adhesives and the study of mechanical behavior once cured, provide key information to choose the best option for any specific application. The proposed methodology for the curing characterization, based on thermal analysis and rheology, is described through the comparison of three commercial adhesives. The experimental techniques used here are Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Rheology. TGA provides information about the thermal stability and filler content, DSC allows the evaluation of some thermal events associated to the cure reaction and to thermal changes of the cured material when subjected to temperature changes. Rheology complements the information of the thermal transformations from a mechanical point of view. Thus, the curing reaction can be tracked through the elastic modulus (mainly the storage modulus), the phase angle and the gap. In addition, it is also shown that although DSC is of no use to study the curing of moisture curable adhesives, it is a very convenient method to evaluate the low temperature glass transition of amorphous systems.
Nowadays there is an increasing demand of adhesives. Today's industry demands that adhesives have increasingly varied properties, adapted to the growing diversity of possible new applications. It makes the selection of the most suitable option for each specific case a difficult task. Therefore, creating a standard methodology to characterize the adhesives according to their properties would facilitate the selection process. The analysis of the adhesive during the curing process and the final properties of the cured system are crucial to decide whether an adhesive is valid or not for a certain application.
Two of the most commonly used experimental techniques to study the behavior of adhesives are Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA). Rheological measurements and thermogravimetric tests are also widely used. Through them, the glass transition temperature (Tg) and the residual heat of curing, which are related to the degree of cure1,2, can be determined.
TGA provides information about the thermal stability of the adhesives3,4, which is very useful to establish further process conditions, on the other hand rheological measurements allows the determination of the gel time of the adhesive, analysis of the curing shrinkage, and the definition of the viscoelastic properties of a cured sample5,6,7, while the DSC technique allows measurement of the residual heat of curing, and discernment between one or more thermal processes that can take place simultaneously during the curing8,9. Therefore, the combination of DSC, TGA and rheological methodologies provide detailed and reliable information to develop a complete characterization of adhesives.
There is a number of studies of adhesives where DSC and TGA are applied together10,11,12. There are also some studies that complement the DSC with rheological measurements13,14,15. However, there is not a standardized protocol to address the comparison of adhesives in a systematic way. That comparison would all to better choose the right adhesives in different contexts. In this work, an experimental methodology is proposed for doing a characterization of the curing process through the combined use of the thermal analysis and rheology. Applying these techniques as an ensemble allows to gather information about the adhesive behavior during and after the curing process, also the thermal stability and the Tg of the material16.
The proposed methodology involving the three techniques, DSC, TGA and rheology is described in this work using three commercial adhesives as an example. One of the adhesives, hereinafter referred to as S2c, is a two-component adhesive: component A contains tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate and component B contains benzoyl peroxide. The component B acts as an initiator of the curing reaction by causing the tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate rings to open. Through a free radical polymerization mechanism, the C=C bond of the monomer reacts with the growing radical to form a chain with tetrahydrofurfuryl side groups17. The other adhesives, T1c and T2c, are the one- and two-component versions from the same commercial house of a modified silane polymer adhesive. The curing process begins by the hydrolysis of the silane group18, which can be initiated by ambient humidity (as in the case of T1c) or by the addition of a second component (as in the case of T2c).
Concerning the application areas of these three different systems: the adhesive S2c was designed to substitute, in some cases, welding, riveting, clinching and other mechanical fastening techniques and it is suitable for high strength fastening of concealed joints on different types of substrates including top coats, plastics, glass, etc. The T1c and T2c adhesives are used for elastic bonding of metals and plastics: in caravan manufacturing, in the railroad vehicle industry or in shipbuilding.
1. Checking the manufacturer curing conditions
2. DSC analysis of a fresh sample
3. Rheological analysis
In order to show the application of the proposed method three adhesive systems are used (Table of Materials):
The thermal stability and...
A preliminary TGA test of each adhesive is always a fundamental step as it gives information about the temperature range at which the material is stable. That information is crucial to correctly setting up further experiments. In addition, TGA may also inform about the filler content, which can be very insightful to understand that storage and loss modulus may not to cross along the cure.
On the other hand, DSC allows to study the cure of most thermosetting systems but not of those whose cure ...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This research has been partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [Grant MTM2014-52876-R], [MTM2017-82724-R] and by Xunta de Galicia (Unidad Mixta de Investigación UDC-Navantia [IN853B-2018/02]). We would like to thank TA Instruments for the image showing the scheme of the rheometer used. This image is included in the Table of Materials of the article. We also would like to thank Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry for its permission for using some data from reference [16], and the Centro de Investigaciones Científicas Avanzadas (CICA) for using its facilities.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
2960 SDT | TA Instruments | Simultaneous DSC/TGA device: Used to perform thermogravimetric tests. | |
Discovery HR-2 | TA Instruments | Rheometer to perform rheological test. | |
MDSC Q2000 | TA Instruments | Differential Scanning Calorimeter with optional temperature modulation. Used to peform DSC and MDSC tests. | |
Sikafast 5211NT | Sika | S2c: a two component system manufactured by Sika. It is based on tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate and contains an ethoxylated aromatic amine. The second component contains benzoyl peroxide as the initiator for the crosslinking reaction. | |
Teroson MS 939 FR | Henkel | T1c: manufactured by Henkel, which is a one component sylil-modified-polymer, whose cure reaction is triggered by moisture. | |
Teroson MS 9399 | Henkel | T2c: a two component system manufactured by Henkel. It is a sylil-modified-polymer too but the second component is aimed to make the curing rate a little more independent from the moisture content of air. | |
TRIOS | TA Instruments | Control Software for the rheometer. Version 4.4.0.41651 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved