A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Summary

Here, we present a protocol for the surgical implantation of a permanently indwelling optical window for the murine thorax, which enables high-resolution, intravital imaging of the lung. The permanence of the window makes it well-suited to the study of dynamic cellular processes in the lung, especially those that are slowly evolving, such as metastatic progression of disseminated tumor cells.

Abstract

Metastasis, accounting for ~90% of cancer-related mortality, involves the systemic spread of cancer cells from primary tumors to secondary sites such as the bone, brain, and lung. Although extensively studied, the mechanistic details of this process remain poorly understood. While common imaging modalities, including computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), offer varying degrees of gross visualization, each lacks the temporal and spatial resolution necessary to detect the dynamics of individual tumor cells. To address this, numerous techniques have been described for intravital imaging of common metastatic sites. Of these sites, the lung has proven especially challenging to access for intravital imaging owing to its delicacy and critical role in sustaining life. Although several approaches have previously been described for single-cell intravital imaging of the intact lung, all involve highly invasive and terminal procedures, limiting the maximum possible imaging duration to 6-12 h. Described here is an improved technique for the permanent implantation of a minimally invasive thoracic optical Window for High-Resolution Imaging of the Lung (WHRIL). Combined with an adapted approach to microcartography, the innovative optical window facilitates serial intravital imaging of the intact lung at single-cell resolution across multiple imaging sessions and spanning multiple weeks. Given the unprecedented duration of time over which imaging data can be gathered, the WHRIL can facilitate the accelerated discovery of the dynamic mechanisms underlying metastatic progression and numerous additional biologic processes within the lung.

Introduction

Responsible for ~90% of deaths, metastas is isthe major cause of cancer-related mortality1. Among the major sites of clinically observed metastasis (bone, liver, lung, brain)2, the lung has proven particularly challenging for in vivo imaging via intravital microscopy. This is because the lung is a delicate organ in perpetual motion. The lungs' continuous motion, further compounded by intrathoracic cardiac motion, represents a substantial barrier to accurate imaging. Therefore, due to its relative inaccessibility to modalities for high-resolution intravital optical imaging, cancer growth within the lung has often been deemed an occult process3.

In the clinical setting, imaging technologies such as computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enable visualization deep within intact vital organs such as the lung4. However, while these modalities provide for excellent views of the gross organ (often even revealing pathology prior to the onset of clinical symptoms), they are of inadequate resolution to detect individual disseminated tumor cells as they advance through the early stages of metastasis. Consequently, by the time the aforementioned modalities provide any indication of metastasis to the lung, metastatic foci are already well established and proliferating. Since the tumor microenvironment plays a pivotal role in cancer progression and metastasis formation5,6, there is great interest in investigating the earliest steps of metastatic seeding in vivo. This interest is further fueled by the increased appreciation that cancer cells disseminate even before the primary tumor is detected7,8 and the increasing evidence that they survive as single cells and in a dormant state for years to decades before outgrowth into macro-metastasis9.

Previously, imaging of the lung at single-cell resolution has necessarily involved ex vivo or explant preparations10,11,12,13, limiting analyses to single time points. While these preparations do provide useful information, they do not provide any insight into the dynamics of tumor cells within the organ connected to an intact circulatory system.

Recent technological advancements in imaging have enabled intravital visualization of the intact lung at single-cell resolution over periods of up to 12 h14,15,16. This was accomplished in a murine model using a protocol that involved mechanical ventilation, resection of the ribcage, and vacuum-assisted lung immobilization. However, despite offering the first single cell-resolution images of the physiologically intact lung, the technique is highly invasive and terminal, thereby precluding further imaging sessions beyond the index procedure. This limitation, therefore, prevents its application to the study of metastatic steps that take longer than 12 h, such as dormancy and re-initiation of growth14,15,16. Further still, patterns of cellular behavior observed using this imaging approach must be cautiously interpreted, given that vacuum-induced pressure differentials are likely to cause diversions in blood flow.

To overcome these limitations, a minimally invasive Window for High-Resolution Imaging of the Lung (WHRIL) was recently developed, facilitating serial imaging over an extended period of days to weeks, without the need for mechanical ventilation17. The technique entails the creation of a 'transparent ribcage' with a sealed thoracic cavity for the preservation of normal lung function. The procedure is well-tolerated, permitting the mouse to recover without meaningful alteration to baseline activity and function. To reliably localize exactly the same lung region at each respective imaging session, a technique known as microcartography was applied to this window18. Through this window, it was possible to capture images of cells as they arrive at the vascular bed of the lung, cross the endothelium, undergo cell division, and grow into micro-metastases.

Here, the study presents a detailed description of an improved surgical protocol for implantation of the WHRIL, which simplifies the surgery while simultaneously increasing its reproducibility and quality. While this protocol was designed to enable investigation of the dynamic processes underlying metastasis, the technique may be alternatively applied to investigations of numerous processes of lung biology and pathology.

Protocol

All procedures described in this protocol have been performed in accordance with guidelines and regulations for the use of vertebrate animals, including prior approval by the Albert Einstein College of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

1. Passivation of windows

  1. Rinse the optical window frames (Supplemental Figure 2) with a 1% (w/v) solution of enzymatically-active detergent.
  2. Inside a glass jar, submerge the optical window frames in 5% (w/v) sodium hydroxide solution for 30 min at 70 °C.
  3. Remove and wash the window frames with deionized water.
  4. Inside a new glass jar, submerge the optical window frames in 7% (w/v) citric acid solution for 10 min at 55 °C.
  5. Again, remove and wash the window frames with deionized water.
  6. Repeat step 1.2; then, remove and wash window frames with deionized water.

2. Preparation for surgery

  1. Conduct the surgery in a hood or laminar flow cabinet. To avoid contamination of the operative field, ensure distinct, separated areas for preparation, surgery, and recovery, respectively.
  2. In advance of the surgery, sterilize all surgical instruments in an autoclave. If subsequent procedures are planned, re-sterilize instruments using a hot bead sterilizer. For this surgical procedure, a tips-only technique is used. 
  3. Power on the heated surgical bead and bead sterilizer.
  4. Anesthetize the mouse with 5% isoflurane in the anesthesia chamber.
  5. To remove hair, generously apply depilatory cream to the upper-left chest incision site. After no longer than 20 s, firmly wipe away hair and depilatory cream using moistened tissue paper. Repeat as necessary to remove all hair from the surgical site.
  6. Using 2-0 silk suture, tie a knot at the base of a 22 G catheter, leaving 2-inch long tails (see Figure 1A).

3. Lung window surgery

  1. Wash hands using antiseptic soap.
  2. Prior to each new surgery, don new sterile gloves.
  3. To prevent corneal drying and damage to the mouse's eyes, apply ophthalmic ointment to both eyes.
  4. Dilute 10 µL (0.1 mg/kg) of buprenorphine in 90 µL of sterile PBS, and then inject subcutaneously to ensure preoperative analgesia.
  5. Intubate the mouse with the silk suture-tied 22 G catheter15. Using an inflation bulb, confirm successful intubation by noting bilateral chest rise upon bulb squeeze.
  6. Secure the intubation catheter by tying the 2-0 silk suture around the mouse's snout (see Figure 1B).
  7. Place the mouse onto the heated surgical stand and position it in the right lateral decubitus to expose the left thorax.
  8. Connect ventilator to the intubation catheter.
  9. Ensure controlled, stable ventilation on the ventilator and then lower the isofluorane to 3%. At the procedure's onset and periodically throughout the duration of the procedure, assess the adequacy of anesthesia by performing a toe pinch test.
  10. Using paper tape, cranially and caudally secure the front and hind limbs, respectively, to the heated surgical stage. Place another piece of tape along the length of the mouse's back to maximize exposure to the surgical field (see Figure 1C).
  11. Open all surgical instruments underneath the hood for the preservation of sterility.
  12. Sterilize the surgical site by a generous application of antiseptic to the mouse's skin.
  13. Using forceps, lift the skin and make an ~10 mm circular incision, ~7 mm to the left of the sternum and ~7 mm superior to the subcostal margin (Figure 1D).
  14. Carefully identify any major vessels. If the division of vessels is necessary, cauterize at both ends with the electrocautery pen to maintain hemostasis.
  15. Excise the soft tissue overlying the ribs.
  16. Elevate the 6th or 7th rib using forceps. Using a single blade of the blunt micro-dissecting scissors, the rounded side towards the lung, carefully pierce the intercostal muscle between the 6th and 7th ribs to enter the intrathoracic space (Figure 1E).
  17. Delicately discharge compressed air canister at the defect to collapse the lung and separate it from the chest wall. Fire the compressed air in short bursts to prevent iatrogenic lung injury.
  18. Place the biopsy punch over the cutting tool (Supplementary Figure 1) and carefully maneuver the cutting tool's base through the intercostal incision (Figure 1F).
  19. Orient the base of the cutting tool such that it is parallel with the chest wall. Punch a 5 mm circular hole through the rib cage (Figure 1G).
    NOTE: Ensure that the exposed lung tissue is pink, without signs of damage.
  20. Using the 5-0 silk suture, create a purse-string stitch ~1 mm from the hole, circumferentially, interlacing with the ribs (Figure 1H).
  21. Position the window frame such that the edges of the circular defect align within the window's groove (see Figure 1I).
  22. Securely lock the implanted window by tightly tying down the 5-0 silk suture.
  23. Load 100 µL of cyanoacrylate gel adhesive into the 1 mL syringe.
  24. Dry the lung by applying a steady gentle stream of compressed air for ~10-20 s (Figure 1J).
  25. Using forceps to grip the window frame by its outside edge, gently lift to ensure separation of the lung from the undersurface of the window frame.
  26. Dispense a thin layer of cyanoacrylate adhesive along the undersurface of the optical window frame (Figure 1K).
  27. Increase the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the ventilator to inflate the lung.
  28. Holding for 10-20 s, apply gentle but firm pressure to attach the optical window frame onto the lung tissue (Figure 1L).
  29. Dispense a 5 mm drop of the remaining cyanoacrylate gel adhesive onto a rectangular coverslip.
  30. Pick up the 5 mm coverslip using vacuum pickups. Dip the undersurface of the coverslip into the adhesive, and then scrape off excess adhesive three times against the side of the rectangular coverslip, such that only a very thin layer remains (Figure 1M).
  31. Carefully position the coverslip to fit inside the recess at the center of the optical window frame and is held above the lung tissue at an angle. Briefly clamp the ventilator to generate positive pressure, hyper-inflating the lung. Using a rotating motion, orient the coverslip parallel to the lung tissue to create direct apposition between the lung's surface and the undersurface of the coverslip. Maintain gentle pressure, allowing the cyanoacrylate adhesive to set (~25 s).
  32. Use the forceps to separate the coverslip from the vacuum pickups (Figure 1N).
  33. Using 5-0 silk suture, again create a purse-string stitch, this time <1 mm circumferentially from the cut-edge of the skin incision. Tuck any excess skin underneath the outer rim of the window frame before tying it down tightly with locking knots.
  34. To ensure an air-tight seal between the coverslip and the window frame, dispense a small amount of liquid cyanoacrylate at the metal-glass interface (see Figure 1O).
  35. Attach a sterile needle to a 1 mL insulin syringe. Insert the needle below the xiphoid process, advancing toward the left shoulder, entering the thoracic cavity through the diaphragm. Gently draw back on the syringe to remove any residual air from the thoracic cavity (see Figure 1P).
  36. Remove the tape from the mouse.
  37. Turn off isoflurane.
  38. Continue ventilation with 100% oxygen until the mouse appears ready to awaken.
  39. Carefully cut the 2-0 silk suture around the mouse's snout and extubate the mouse.
  40. Transfer the mouse to a clean cage and monitor until fully recovered. Euthanize the mouse if signs of difficulty in breathing are present.
  41. Provide postoperative analgesia by subcutaneously injecting 10 µL (0.1 mg/kg) of buprenorphine diluted in 90 µL of sterile phosphate buffered solution (PBS).

Results

The steps of the surgical procedure described in this protocol are summarized and illustrated in Figure 1. Briefly, prior to surgery, mice are anesthetized and the hair over the left thorax is removed. Mice are intubated and mechanically ventilated to enable survival upon breachment of the thoracic cavity. Soft tissue overlying the ribs is excised, and a small circular defect is created, spanning the 6th and 7th ribs. The optical window frame is inserted into ...

Discussion

At sites of distant metastasis such as the lung, high-resolution optical imaging provides insight into the elaborate dynamics of tumor cell metastasis. By enabling in vivo visualization of single cancer cells and their interactions with the host tissue, high-resolution intravital imaging has proven instrumental to understanding the mechanisms underlying metastasis.

Described here is an improved surgical protocol for the permanent thoracic implantation of an optical window designed to ...

Disclosures

The authors disclose no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the following grants: CA216248, CA013330, Montefiore's Ruth L. Kirschstein T32 Training Grant CA200561, METAvivor Early Career Award, the Gruss-Lipper Biophotonics Center and its Integrated Imaging Program, and Jane A. and Myles P. Dempsey. We would like to thank the Analytical Imaging Facility (AIF) at Einstein College of Medicine for imaging support.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
1% (w/v) solution of enzyme-active detergentAlconox IncN/A concentrated, anionic detergent with protease enzyme for manual and ultrasonic cleaning
2 µm fluorescent microspheresInvitrogenF8827
5 mm coverslipElectron Microscopy Sciences72296-05
5% (w/v) solution of sodium hydroxideSigma-AldrichS8045
5% IsofluraneHenry Schein, Inc29405
5-0 braided silk with RB-1 cutting needleEthicon, Inc.774B
7% (w/v) solution of citric acidSigma-Aldrich251275
8 mm stainless steel window frameN/AN/ACustom made, Supplementary Figure 2
9 cm 2-0 silk tieEthicon, Inc.LA55G
5 mm disposable biopsy punchIntegra 33-35-SH
Blunt micro-dissecting scissorsRobozRS-5980
BuprenorphineHospira0409-2012-32
Cautery penBraintree ScientificGEM 5917
Chlorhexidine gluconate Becton, Dickinson and Company260100ChloraPrep Single swabstick 1.75 mL
Compressed air canisterFalconDPSJB-12
Cyanoacrylate adhesiveHenkel AdhesivesLOC1363589
Fiber-optic illuminatorO.C. White CompanyFL3000
Bead sterilizerCellPoint ScientificGER 5287-120VGerminator 500
Graefe forcepsRobozRS-5135
Infrared heat lampBraintree ScientificHL-1
Insulin syringesBecton Dickinson329424
Isoflurane vaporizerSurgiVetVCT302
Jacobson needle holder with lockKalson SurgicalT1-140
Long cotton tip applicatorsMedline IndustriesMDS202055
NairChurch & Dwight Co., Inc.40002957
Neomycin/polymyxin B/bacitracinJohnson & Johnson501373005Antibiotic ointmen
Ophthalmic ointmentDechra Veterinary Products17033-211-38
Paper tapeFisher ScientificS68702
Murine ventilatorKent ScientificPS-02PhysioSuite
Rectangular Cover GlassCorning2980-225
Rodent intubation standBraintree ScientificRIS 100
Small animal lung inflation bulbHarvard Apparatus72-9083
Stainless steel cutting toolN/AN/ACustom made, Supplementary Figure 1
Sulfamethoxazole and Trimethoprim oral antibioticHi-Tech Pharmacal Co.50383-823-16
SurgiSuite Multi-Functional Surgical Platform for Mice, with WarmingKent ScientificSURGI-M02Heated surgical platform
Tracheal catheterExelint International2674622 G catheter
Vacuum pickup system metal probeTed Pella, Inc.528-112

References

  1. Mehlen, P., Puisieux, A. Metastasis: a question of life or death. Nature Reviews Cancer. 6 (6), 449-458 (2006).
  2. Lee, Y. T. Breast carcinoma: pattern of metastasis at autopsy. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 23 (3), 175-180 (1983).
  3. Chambers, A. F., Groom, A. C., MacDonald, I. C. Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2 (8), 563-572 (2002).
  4. Coste, A., Oktay, M. H., Condeelis, J. S., Entenberg, D. Intravital imaging techniques for biomedical and clinical research. Cytometry Part A. 95 (5), 448-457 (2019).
  5. DeClerck, Y. A., Pienta, K. J., Woodhouse, E. C., Singer, D. S., Mohla, S. The tumor microenvironment at a turning point knowledge gained over the last decade, and challenges and opportunities ahead: A white paper from the NCI TME network. Cancer Research. 77 (5), 1051-1059 (2017).
  6. Borriello, L., et al. The role of the tumor microenvironment in tumor cell intravasation and dissemination. European Journal of Cell Biology. 99 (6), 151098 (2020).
  7. Hosseini, H., et al. Early dissemination seeds metastasis in breast cancer. Nature. 540 (7634), 552-558 (2016).
  8. Harper, K. L., et al. Mechanism of early dissemination and metastasis in Her2(+) mammary cancer. Nature. 540, 589-612 (2016).
  9. Risson, E., Nobre, A. R., Maguer-Satta, V., Aguirre-Ghiso, J. A. The current paradigm and challenges ahead for the dormancy of disseminated tumor cells. Nature Cancer. 1 (7), 672-680 (2020).
  10. Qian, B., et al. A distinct macrophage population mediates metastatic breast cancer cell extravasation, establishment and growth. PLoS One. 4 (8), 6562 (2009).
  11. Qian, B. Z., et al. CCL2 recruits inflammatory monocytes to facilitate breast-tumour metastasis. Nature. 475 (7355), 222-225 (2011).
  12. Miyao, N., et al. Various adhesion molecules impair microvascular leukocyte kinetics in ventilator-induced lung injury. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. 290 (6), 1059-1068 (2006).
  13. Bernal, P. J., et al. Nitric-oxide-mediated zinc release contributes to hypoxic regulation of pulmonary vascular tone. Circulation Research. 102 (12), 1575-1583 (2008).
  14. Entenberg, D., et al. In vivo subcellular resolution optical imaging in the lung reveals early metastatic proliferation and motility. IntraVital. 4 (3), 1-11 (2015).
  15. Rodriguez-Tirado, C., et al. Long-term High-Resolution Intravital Microscopy in the Lung with a Vacuum Stabilized Imaging Window. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (116), e54603 (2016).
  16. Looney, M. R., et al. Stabilized imaging of immune surveillance in the mouse lung. Nature Methods. 8 (1), 91-96 (2011).
  17. Entenberg, D., et al. A permanent window for the murine lung enables high-resolution imaging of cancer metastasis. Nature Methods. 15 (1), 73-80 (2018).
  18. Dunphy, M. P., Entenberg, D., Toledo-Crow, R., Larson, S. M. In vivo microcartography and subcellular imaging of tumor angiogenesis: a novel platform for translational angiogenesis research. Microvascular Research. 78 (1), 51-56 (2009).
  19. Harney, A. S., Wang, Y., Condeelis, J. S., Entenberg, D. Extended time-lapse intravital imaging of real-time multicellular dynamics in the tumor microenvironment. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (112), e54042 (2016).
  20. Seynhaeve, A. L. B., Ten Hagen, T. L. M. Intravital microscopy of tumor-associated vasculature using advanced dorsal skinfold window chambers on transgenic fluorescent mice. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (131), e55115 (2018).
  21. Entenbery, D., et al. Time-lapsed, large-volume, high-resolution intravital imaging for tissue-wide analysis of single cell dynamics. Methods. 128, 65-77 (2017).
  22. Ueki, H., Wang, I. H., Zhao, D., Gunzer, M., Kawaoka, Y. Multicolor two-photon imaging of in vivo cellular pathophysiology upon influenza virus infection using the two-photon IMPRESS. Nature Protocols. 15 (3), 1041-1065 (2020).
  23. Ritsma, L., Ponsioen, B., van Rheenen, J. Intravital imaging of cell signaling in mice. IntraVital. 1 (1), 2-10 (2012).
  24. Kedrin, D., et al. Intravital imaging of metastatic behavior through a mammary imaging window. Nature Methods. 5 (12), 1019-1021 (2008).
  25. Harney, A. S., et al. Real-time imaging reveals local, transient vascular permeability, and tumor cell intravasation stimulated by TIE2hi macrophage-derived VEGFA. Cancer Discovery. 5 (9), 932-943 (2015).
  26. Karagiannis, G. S., et al. Assessing tumor microenvironment of metastasis doorway-mediated vascular permeability associated with cancer cell dissemination using intravital imaging and fixed tissue analysis. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (148), e59633 (2019).
  27. Karagiannis, G. S., et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces breast cancer metastasis through a TMEM-mediated mechanism. Science Translational Medicine. 9 (397), (2017).
  28. Dreher, M. R., et al. Tumor vascular permeability, accumulation, and penetration of macromolecular drug carriers. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 98 (5), 335-344 (2006).
  29. Rizzo, V., Kim, D., Duran, W. N., DeFouw, D. O. Ontogeny of microvascular permeability to macromolecules in the chick chorioallantoic membrane during normal angiogenesis. Microvascular Research. 49 (1), 49-63 (1995).
  30. Hoshino, A., et al. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature. 527 (7578), 329-335 (2015).
  31. Ueki, H., et al. In vivo imaging of the pathophysiological changes and neutrophil dynamics in influenza virus-infected mouse lungs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 115 (28), 6622-6629 (2018).
  32. Kornfield, T. E., Newman, E. A. Measurement of retinal blood flow using fluorescently labeled red blood cells. eNeuro. 2 (2), (2015).
  33. Dasari, S., Weber, P., Makhloufi, C., Lopez, E., Forestier, C. L. Intravital microscopy imaging of the liver following leishmania infection: An assessment of hepatic hemodynamics. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE. (101), e52303 (2015).
  34. Chaigneau, E., Roche, M., Charpak, S. Unbiased analysis method for measurement of red blood cell size and velocity with laser scanning microscopy. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 13, 644 (2019).
  35. Kim, T. N., et al. Line-scanning particle image velocimetry: an optical approach for quantifying a wide range of blood flow speeds in live animals. PLoS One. 7 (6), 38590 (2012).
  36. Presson, R. G., et al. Two-photon imaging within the murine thorax without respiratory and cardiac motion artifact. American Journal of Pathology. 179 (1), 75-82 (2011).
  37. Tabuchi, A., Mertens, M., Kuppe, H., Pries, A. R., Kuebler, W. M. Intravital microscopy of the murine pulmonary microcirculation. Journal of Applied Physiology. 104 (2), 338-346 (2008).
  38. Travis, W. D. Classification of lung cancer. Seminars in Roentgenology. 46 (3), 178-186 (2011).
  39. Scholten, E. T., Kreel, L. Distribution of lung metastases in the axial plane. A combined radiological-pathological study. Radiologica Clinica (Basel). 46 (4), 248-265 (1977).
  40. Braman, S. S., Whitcomb, M. E. Endobronchial metastasis. Archives of Internal Medicine. 135 (4), 543-547 (1975).
  41. Herold, C. J., Bankier, A. A., Fleischmann, D. Lung metastases. European Radiology. 6 (5), 596-606 (1996).
  42. Kimura, H., et al. Real-time imaging of single cancer-cell dynamics of lung metastasis. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry. 109 (1), 58-64 (2010).
  43. Thevenaz, P., Ruttimann, U. E., Unser, M. A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing: A Publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society. 7 (1), 27-41 (1998).
  44. Sharma, V. P. ImageJ plugin HyperStackReg V5.6. Zenodo. , (2018).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website.

By continuing to use our website or clicking “Continue”, you are agreeing to accept our cookies.

Learn More