Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Representative Results
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Preclinical models aim to advance the knowledge of cancer biology and predict treatment efficacy. This paper describes the generation of zebrafish-based patient-derived xenografts (zPDXs) with tumor tissue fragments. The zPDXs were treated with chemotherapy, the therapeutic effect of which was assessed in terms of cell apoptosis of the transplanted tissue.

Abstract

Cancer is one of the main causes of death worldwide, and the incidence of many types of cancer continues to increase. Much progress has been made in terms of screening, prevention, and treatment; however, preclinical models that predict the chemosensitivity profile of cancer patients are still lacking. To fill this gap, an in vivo patient-derived xenograft model was developed and validated. The model was based on zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos at 2 days post fertilization, which were used as recipients of xenograft fragments of tumor tissue taken from a patient's surgical specimen.

It is also worth noting that bioptic samples were not digested or disaggregated, in order to maintain the tumor microenvironment, which is crucial in terms of analyzing tumor behavior and the response to therapy. The protocol details a method for establishing zebrafish-based patient-derived xenografts (zPDXs) from primary solid tumor surgical resection. After screening by an anatomopathologist, the specimen is dissected using a scalpel blade. Necrotic tissue, vessels, or fatty tissue are removed and then chopped into 0.3 mm x 0.3 mm x 0.3 mm pieces.

The pieces are then fluorescently labeled and xenotransplanted into the perivitelline space of zebrafish embryos. A large number of embryos can be processed at a low cost, enabling high-throughput in vivo analyses of the chemosensitivity of zPDXs to multiple anticancer drugs. Confocal images are routinely acquired to detect and quantify the apoptotic levels induced by chemotherapy treatment compared to the control group. The xenograft procedure has a significant time advantage, since it can be completed in a single day, providing a reasonable time window to carry out a therapeutic screening for co-clinical trials.

Introduction

One of the problems of clinical cancer research is that cancer is not a single disease, but a variety of different diseases that can evolve over time, requiring specific treatments depending on the characteristics of the tumor itself and the patient1. Consequently, the challenge is to move toward patient-oriented cancer research, in order to identify new personalized strategies for the early prediction of cancer treatment outcomes2. This is particularly relevant for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), since it is considered a hard-to-treat cancer, with a 5-year survival rate of 11%3.

Protocol

The Italian Ministry of Public Health approved all the animal experiments described, in conformity with the Directive 2010/63/EU on the use and care of animals. The local Ethical Committee approved the study, under registration number 70213. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved. Before starting, all the solutions and the equipment should be prepared (section 1) and the fish should be crossed (section 2).

1. Preparation of solutions and equipment

Representative Results

This protocol describes the experimental approach for establishing zPDXs from primary human pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A tumor sample was collected, minced, and stained using fluorescent dye, as described in protocol section 4. zPDXs were then successfully established by implantation of a piece of tumor into the perivitelline space of 2 dpf zebrafish embryos, as described in protocol section 5. As described in protocol section 6, the zPDXs were further screened to identify the chemotherapy sensitivity profiles of patient.......

Discussion

In vivo models in cancer research provide invaluable tools to understand cancer biology and predict the cancer treatment response. Currently, different in vivo models are available, for example, genetically modified animals (transgenic and knockout mice) or patient-derived xenografts from human primary cells. Despite many optimal features, each one has various limitations. In particular, the aforementioned models lack a reliable way to mimic the patient tumor tissue microenvironment.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by Fondazione Pisa (project 114/16). The authors would like to thank Raffaele Gaeta from the Histopathology Unit of Azienda Ospedaliera Pisana for the patient sample selection and pathology support. We also thank Alessia Galante for the technical support in the experiments. This article is based upon work from COST Action TRANSPAN, CA21116, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).

....

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
5-fluorouracilTeva Pharma AGSMP 1532755
48 multiwell plateSarstedt83 3923
96 multiwell plateSarstedt82.1581.001
AcetoneMerck179124
Agarose powder MerckA9539
AmphotericinThermo Fisher Scientific15290018
Anti-Nuclei Antibody, clone 235-1MerckMAB1281 1:200 dilution
Aquarium net QN6Penn-plax0-30172-23006-6
BSAMerckA9418
CellTraceThermo Fisher ScientificC34567
CellTracker CM-DiI Thermo Fisher ScientificC7001
CellTracker Deep Red Thermo Fisher ScientificC34565
Cleaved Caspase-3 (Asp175) (5A1E) Rabbit mAbCell Signaling Technology9661S1:250 dilution
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) PanReac AppliChem ITW ReagentsA3672,0250
Dumont #5 forcepsWorld Precision Instruments501985
Folinic acid -  LederfolinPfizer
Glass capillaries, 3.5"Drummond Scientific Company3-000-203-G/XOuter diameter = 1.14 mm. Inner diameter = 0.53 mm. 
Glass vials VWR InternationalWHEAW224581
Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 647Thermo Fisher ScientificA-21244  1:500 dilution
Goat serumThermo Fisher Scientific31872
Hoechst 33342Thermo Fisher ScientificH3570
IrinotecanHospira
Low Temperature Freezer VialsVWR International479-1220
McIlwain Tissue ChopperWorld Precision Instruments
Microplate MixerSCILOGEX822000049999
OxaliplatinTeva
ParaformaldehydeMerckP6148-500G
PBSThermo Fisher Scientific14190094
Penicillin-streptomycin Thermo Fisher Scientific15140122
Petri dish 100 mmSarstedt83 3902500
Petri dish 60 mmSarstedt83 3901
Plastic Pasteur pipetteSarstedt86.1171.010
Poly-MountTebu-bio18606-5
Propidium iodideMerckP4170
RPMI-1640 mediumThermo Fisher Scientific11875093
Scalpel blade No 10 Sterile Stainless SteelVWR InternationalSWAN3001
Scalpel handle #3World Precision Instruments500236
TricaineMerckE10521
Triton X-100 MerckT8787
Tween 20MerckP9416
Vertical Micropipette PullerShutter instrumentP-30 

References

  1. Rubin, H. Understanding cancer. Science. 219 (4589), 1170-1172 (1983).
  2. Krzyszczyk, P., et al. The growing role of precision and personalized medicine for cancer treatment. Technology. 6 (3-4), 79-100 (2018).<....

Explore More Articles

ZebrafishPatient derived XenograftPDXPancreatic CancerChemosensitivity TestingTumor MicroenvironmentPersonalized MedicineTissue ProcessingCell StainingXenograft Establishment

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved