Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

We describe a method combining immunomagnetic beads and fluorescence-activated cell sorting to isolate and analyze defined immune cell subpopulations of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (monocytes, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells). Using this method, magnetic and fluorescently labeled cells can be purified and analyzed.

Abstract

Infectious mononucleosis (IM) is an acute syndrome mostly associated with primary EpsteinBarr virus (EBV) infection. The main clinical symptoms include irregular fever, lymphadenopathy, and significantly increased lymphocytes in peripheral blood. The pathogenic mechanism of IM is still unclear; there is no effective treatment method for it, with mainly symptomatic therapies being available. The main question in EBV immunobiology is why only a small subset of infected individuals shows severe clinical symptoms and even develop EBV-associated malignancies, whilemost individuals are asymptomatic for life with the virus.

B cells are first involved in IM because EBV receptors are presented on their surface. Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic innate lymphocytes that are important for killing EBV-infected cells. The proportion of CD4+ T cells decreases while that of CD8+ T cells expands dramatically during acute EBV infection, and the persistence of CD8+ T cells is important for lifelong control of IM. Those immune cells play important roles in IM, and their functions need to be identified separately. For this purpose, monocytes are separated first from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of IM individuals using CD14 microbeads, a column, and a magnetic separator.

The remaining PBMCs are stained with peridinin-chlorophyll-protein (PerCP)/Cyanine 5.5 anti-CD3, allophycocyanin (APC)/Cyanine 7 anti-CD4, phycoerythrin (PE) anti-CD8, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) anti-CD19, APC anti-CD56, and APC anti-CD16 antibodies to sort CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B cells, and NK cells using a flow cytometer. Furthermore, transcriptome sequencing of five subpopulations was performed to explore their functions and pathogenic mechanisms in IM.

Introduction

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), a γ-herpesvirus also known as human herpes virus type 4, is ubiquitous in the human population and establishes lifelong latent infection in more than 90% of the adult population1. Most EBV primary infection occurs during childhood and adolescence, with a fraction of patients manifesting with infectious mononucleosis (IM)2, showing characteristic immunopathology, including an activated immune response with CD8+ T cells in blood and a transient proliferation of EBV-infected B cells in the oropharynx3. The course of IM may last for 2–6 weeks and the majority of the patients recover well4. However, some individuals develop persistent or recurrent IM-like symptoms with high morbidity and mortality, which is classified as chronic active EBV infection (CAEBV)5. In addition, EBV is an important oncogenic virus, which is closely related to a variety of malignancies, including epithelioid and lymphoid malignancies such asnasopharyngeal carcinoma, Burkitt's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), and T/NK cell lymphoma6. Although EBV has been studied for over 50 years, its pathogenesis and the mechanism by which it induces the proliferation of lymphocytes have not been fully elucidated.

Several studies have investigated the molecular signatures for the immunopathology of EBV infection by transcriptome sequencing. Zhong et al. analyzed whole-transcriptome profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from Chinese children with IM or CAEBV to find that CD8+ T cell expansion was predominantly found in the IM group7, suggesting that CD8+ T cells may play a major role in IM. Similarly, another study found lower proportions of EBV-specific cytotoxic T and CD19+ B cells and higher percentages of CD8+ T cells in patients with IM caused by primary EBV infection than in patients with IM caused both by EBV reactivation and other agents8. B cells are first involved in IM because EBV receptors are presented on their surface. Al Tabaa et al. found that B cells were polyclonally activated and differentiated intoplasmablasts (CD19+, CD27+ and CD20, and CD138 cells) and plasma cells (CD19+, CD27+ and CD20, and CD138+) during IM9. Moreover, Zhong et al. found that monocyte markers CD14 and CD64 were upregulated in CAEBV, suggesting that monocytes may play an important role in the cellular immune response of CAEBV through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and hyperactive phagocytosis7. Alka et al. characterized the transcriptome of MACS sorted CD56dim CD16+ NK cells from four patients of IM or HL and found that NK cells from both IM and HL had downregulated innate immunity and chemokine signaling genes, which could be responsible for the hyporesponsiveness of NK cells10. In addition, Greenough et al. analyzed gene expression of sorted CD8+ T cells from 10 PBMCs of individuals with IM. They reported that a large proportion of CD8+ T cells in IM were virus-specific, activated, dividing, and primed to exert effector activities11. Both T cell-mediated, EBV-specific responses, and NK cell-mediated, nonspecific responses play essential roles during primary EBV infection. However, these studies only investigated the transcriptome results of the diverse mixture of immune cells or only a certain subpopulation of lymphocytes, which is not sufficient for the comprehensive comparison of the molecular characteristics and functions of different immune cell subpopulations in children with IM at the same disease state.

This paper describes a method that combines immunomagnetic beads and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to isolate and analyze defined immune cell subpopulations of PBMCs (monocytes, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B cells, and NK cells). Using this method, magnetic and fluorescently labeled cells can be purified using a magnetic separator and FACS or analyzed by flow cytometry. RNA can be extracted from the purified cells for transcriptome sequencing. This method will enable the characterization and gene expression of different immune cells in the same states of disease of individuals with IM, which will expand our understanding of the immunopathology of EBV infection.

Protocol

Blood samples were obtained from patients with IM (n = 3), healthy EBV carriers (n = 3), and EBV-uninfected children (n = 3). Volunteers were recruited from Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, and all studies were ethically approved. Ethical approval was obtained by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University (Approval Number: [2021]-E-056-Y). Informed consent of patients was waived as the study only used the remaining samples for clinical testing. All data were fully deidentified and anonymized to protect patient privacy.

1. Isolation of PBMCs from peripheral blood

  1. Collect fresh peripheral blood (2 mL) from patients with IM into K3EDTA tubes by standard venipuncture.
    NOTE: The process needs to be rapid to maintain cell viability.
  2. Dilute peripheral blood to twofold volume with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and layer it on top of human lymphocyte separation medium (density: 1.077 ± 0.001 g/mL) in a 15 mL centrifuge tube.
    NOTE: The volume ratio of blood, PBS, and separation medium was 1:1:1. Add the blood slowly to the separation medium, and centrifuge immediately to avoid blood settling into the separation medium.
  3. Centrifuge at 800 × g for 20 min at room temperature. Transfer the middle layer (enriched PBMCs) to another 15 mL centrifuge tube.
    NOTE: After centrifugation, at the bottom of the tube are erythrocytes, the middle layer is the separation medium, the top layer is plasma, and between the plasma layer and the separation liquid layer were the PBMCs (including lymphocytes and monocytes).
  4. Wash the PBMCs with 10 mL of PBS and centrifuge at 800 × g for 20 min at room temperature; discard the supernatant carefully.
  5. Repeat the washing and centrifuging (step 1.4) 2 x. Resuspend the PBMCs with 1 mL of PBS in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube and count the cells with a trypan blue-based, automated counter.

2. Isolation of CD14 + monocytes from PBMCs using CD14 microbeads

  1. Prepare a buffer solution containing 0.5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 2 mM EDTA in PBS (pH 7.2). Keep the buffer cold (2−8 °C).
    NOTE: Degas the buffer before use as air bubbles could block the column. Keep the cells cold to prevent capping of the antibodies on the cell surface and non-specific cell labeling.
  2. Centrifuge the PBMCs at 300 × g for 10 min at room temperature. Discard the supernatant carefully. Resuspend the cells with 80 µL of the buffer. Add 20 µL of CD14 microbeads to the cell suspension.
    NOTE: If there are ≤107 PBMCs, use the volume indicated above. If there are >107 PBMCs, proportionally increase all reagent volumes and the total volume.
  3. Mix the CD14 microbeads and the cells well in the 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube and incubate for 15 min in a 4 °C refrigerator. Wash the PBMCs with 1 mL of buffer and centrifuge at 300 × g for 10 min at room temperature. Discard the supernatant completely. Resuspend the cells with 500 µL of the buffer.
    NOTE: If there are ≤108 PBMCs, use the volume indicated above. If there are >108 PBMCs, proportionally increase the buffer volume.
  4. Magnetic separation with columns:
    1. Put the column on the magnetic bead separator, and wash the column with 3 mL of buffer. Add the cell suspension (from step 2.3) to the column.
    2. Collect the unlabeled cells that pass through the column into a 15 mL centrifuge tube and wash the column with 3 mL of buffer. Wash the column with 3 x 3 mL of buffer. Collect the total effluent in the 15 mL centrifuge tube.
    3. Place the column in a new 15 mL centrifuge tube. Add 5 mL of buffer to the column. Push the plunger firmly into the column to immediately flush out the magnetically labeled cells into the 15 mL centrifuge tube.
    4. Centrifuge the magnetically labeled cells at 300 × g for 5 min and remove the supernatant. Resuspend the cells in 500 µL of PBS in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube for use in subsequent transcriptome sequencing.

3. Separation of lymphocyte populations from PBMCs by fluorescently labeled antibody staining and FACS

  1. Centrifuge the unlabeled cells (step 2.4.2) at 300 × g for 5 min and remove the supernatant. Resuspend the cells in 100 µL of PBS in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube.
  2. Add 2 µL of each labeled antibody (CD3, CD4, CD8, CD16, CD19, CD56) to the 100 µL of cell suspension (the volumes and conjugated fluorophore information of antibodies are shown in Table 1), incubate on ice for 30 min, and protect from light.
  3. Wash the cells 2 x by adding 1 mL of PBS and centrifuging at 300 × g for 5 min at room temperature. Resuspend the cells in 500 µL of PBS in the 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube. Vortex the cell suspension gently before acquiring data on a flow cell sorter cytometer.

4. Flow cytometry parameter setting

  1. Take 100 µL of the cell suspension (see section 1) in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes as required, and set up a negative control sample, a CD3 single-staining sample, a CD4 single-staining sample, a CD8 single-staining sample, a CD19 single-staining sample, and a CD56/CD16 staining sample.
  2. Add 2 µL of the corresponding fluorescently labeled antibody per 100 µL of the cell suspension and vortex. Incubate on ice for 30 min in the dark. Centrifuge for 5 min at 300 × g and aspirate the supernatant. Resuspend the pellets with 500 µL of PBS and vortex.
  3. Commission the sorting stream and delay the droplets using the fluorescent beads as follows:
    1. Open the cell sorting system, run the power-on program, install the 85 µm nozzle, and open the sorting stream. Set the sorting voltage to 4,500 V, and the Freq to 47.
    2. Adjust the parameters mainly by adjusting the main flow droplet breakpoint and the droplet delay according to the manufacturer's instructions12. Set up the first droplet breakpoint position (Drop1) to 275, and the Gap to 8 in the Breakoff window. Turn on the Sweet Spot automatic sorting mode to allow the cytometry to automatically determine the droplet amplitude value to stabilize the stream.
    3. Adjust the droplet delay to 30.31 in the Side Stream window by loading the fluorescent beads, ensuring that the beads achieve a side flow deflection of >99% in either initial or fine tune mode.
  4. Refer to the gating strategy shown in Figure 1 to perform gating as follows:
    1. Using a forward scatter-area (FSC-A)/side scatter-area (SSC-A) dot plot, draw the polygon gate (P1) to identify the intact lymphocyte population.
    2. Using an FSC-A/FSC-height (FSC-H) dot plot, draw the polygon gate (P2) to identify the single cells and exclude doublets (Figure 1A).
    3. Using a CD19 FITC-A/CD3 PerCP-Cy5.5-A dot plot, draw the rectangular gate (P3) to select CD3+ T cells and CD19+ B cells (Figure 1A,B).
    4. Using a CD4 APC-Cy7-A/CD8 PE-A dot plot, draw a rectangular gate to select CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells (cells with a high fluorescence for these markers, respectively).
    5. Using a CD56/CD16 APC-A/SSC-A dot plot, draw a rectangular gate to select CD56+/CD16+ NK cells (Figure 1C).
  5. Adjust instrumental parameters using the negative control sample:
    1. Install the negative control tube onto the loading port and click Load in the Acquisition Dashboard. Select the Cytometer Settings in the software.
    2. In the Inspector window, click the Parameters tab, and adjust the voltages of FSC, SSC, and different fluorescent dyes; FSC: 231, SSC: 512, PE: 549, APC: 615, APC-Cyanine 7: 824, FITC: 555, PerCP-Cyanine 5.5: 663.
  6. Adjust compensation using the single-stained samples13.
    1. Load the single-stained tubes onto the cytometry sequentially andselect Cytometer Settings in the software. Click the Compensation tab to adjust the compensation.
      ​NOTE: The compensation reference of flow cytometry is shown in Table 2.

5. Cell sorting and collecting data  via flow cytometry

  1. Vortex the cell suspension (separated PBMCs according to sections 1–3) briefly to resuspend the cells before loading the tube into the cytometer. Keep the remaining tubes on ice.
  2. Add 200 µL of FBS to four collection flow tubes to avoid sticking of the sorted cells to the tube wall and place them in the cytometer collection chamber.
  3. Collect CD3+CD4+ T cells, CD3+CD8+ T cells, CD3CD19+ B cells, and CD3 CD56+/CD16+ NK cells separately from the sample of a patient with IM in the four flow tubes (Figure 2A).
  4. Centrifuge the separated cells at 300 × g for 5 min and remove the supernatant. Add 200 µL of RNA isolation reagent to the cells for transcriptome sequencing.
  5. Separate the immune cell subpopulations of samples from healthy EBV carriers and EBV-uninfected children according to the above steps (Figure 2B, C).

Results

Reference of the gating strategy
The gating strategy used to sort the four lymphocyte subpopulations is shown in Figure 1. Briefly, lymphocytes are selected (P1) on a dot plot showing the granulosity (SSC-A) versus size (FSC-A). Then, single cells are selected (P2) on a dot plot showing the size (FSC-A) versus forward scatter (FSC-H), while doublet cells are excluded. CD3+ T cells (P3) and CD19+ B cells (Figure 1B) ar...

Discussion

This protocol represents an efficient way to sort peripheral blood immune cell subpopulations. In this study, venous blood samples from patients with IM, healthy EBV carriers, and EBV-uninfected children were selected as the research objective. This work using the peripheral blood of patients of IM mainly focuses on analyzing and determining the proportions of different cell subsets through multi-color flow cytometry. Transcriptome sequencing is mainly used for the detection and analysis of a certain subpopulation of lym...

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82002130), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7222059) and the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2019-I2M-5-026).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
APC anti-human CD16Biolegend302012Fluorescent antibody 
APC anti-human CD56 (NCAM)Biolegend362504Fluorescent antibody 
APC/Cyanine7 anti-human CD4Biolegend344616Fluorescent antibody 
Automated cell counterBIO RADTC20Cell count
BD FACSAria fluorescence-activated flow cell sorter-cytometer (BD FACSAria II)Becton, Dickinson and Company644832Cell sort
CD14 MicroBeads, humanMiltenyi Biotec130-050-201microbeads
Cell ctng slidesBIO RAD1450016Cell count
Centrifuge tubesFalcon3520971515 mL centrifuge tube
EDTA (≥99%, BioPremium)BeyotimeST1303EDTA
Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) anticoagulant tubesBecton, Dickinson and Company 367862 EDTA anticoagulant tubes
FITC anti-human CD19Biolegend302206Fluorescent antibody 
Gibco Fetal Bovine SerumThermo Fisher Scientific16000-044Fetal Bovine Serum
 High-speed centrifugeSigma 3K15Cell centrifugation for 15 mL centrifuge tube
 High-speed centrifugeEppendorf5424RCell centrifugation for 1.5 mL Eppendorf (EP) tube
Human lymphocyte separation mediumDakeweDKW-KLSH-0100Ficoll-Paque
LS Separation columnsMiltenyi Biotec130-042-401Separation columns
Microcentrifuge tubesAxygenMCT-150-C1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube
MidiMACS SeparatorMiltenyi Biotec130-042-302Magnetic bead separator
PE anti-human CD8Biolegend344706Fluorescent antibody 
PerCP/Cyanine5.5 anti-human CD3Biolegend344808Fluorescent antibody 
Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS)BI02-024-1ACSPBS
Polystyrene round bottom tubesFalcon3522355 mL tube for FACS flow cytometer
TRIzol reagentAmbion15596024Lyse cells for RNA extraction
Trypan Blue Staining Cell Viability Assay KitBeyotimeC0011Trypan Blue Staining

References

  1. Kwok, H., Chiang, A. K. From conventional to next generation sequencing of Epstein-Barr virus genomes. Viruses. 8 (3), 60 (2016).
  2. Bu, W., et al. Immunization with components of the viral fusion apparatus elicits antibodies that neutralize Epstein-Barr virus in B cells and epithelial cells. Immunity. 50 (5), 1305-1316 (2019).
  3. Balfour, H. H., et al. Behavioral, virology, and immunologic factors associated with acquisition and severity of primary Epstein-Barr virus infection in university students. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 207 (1), 80-88 (2013).
  4. Luzuriaga, K., Sullivan, J. L. Infectious mononucleosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 362 (21), 1993-2000 (2010).
  5. Fujiwara, S., et al. Current research on chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection in Japan. Pediatrics International. 56 (2), 159-166 (2014).
  6. Tsao, S. W., Tsang, C. M., Lo, K. W. Epstein-Barr virus infection and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 372 (1732), 20160270 (2017).
  7. Zhong, H., et al. Whole transcriptome profiling reveals major cell types in the cellular immune response against acute and chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection. Scientific Reports. 7 (1), 17775 (2017).
  8. Fedyanina, O. S., et al. The nature and clinical significance of atypical mononuclear cells in infectious mononucleosis caused by the Epstein-Barr virus in children. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 223 (10), 1699-1706 (2021).
  9. Al Tabaa, Y., et al. B-cell polyclonal activation and Epstein-Barr viral abortive lytic cycle are two key features in acute infectious mononucleosis. Journal of Clinical Virology. 52 (1), 33-37 (2011).
  10. M, A., et al. Natural Killer cell transcriptome during primary EBV infection and EBV associated Hodgkin Lymphoma in children-A preliminary observation. Immunobiology. 225 (3), 151907 (2020).
  11. Greenough, T. C., et al. A gene expression signature that correlates with CD8+ T cell expansion in acute EBV infection. Journal of Immunology. 195 (9), 4185-4197 (2015).
  12. Xia, Y., Gao, Y., Wang, B., Zhang, H., Zhang, Q. Optimizing the method of cell separation from bile of patients with cholangiocarcinoma for flow cytometry. Gastroenterology Research and Practice. , 5436961 (2019).
  13. Maecker, H. T., Trotter, J. Flow cytometry controls, instrument setup, and the determination of positivity. Cytometry Part A. 69 (9), 1037-1042 (2006).
  14. Byford, E., Carr, M., Pinon, L., Ahearne, M. J., Wagner, S. D. Isolation of CD4+ T-cells and analysis of circulating T-follicular helper (cTfh) cell subsets from peripheral blood using 6-color flow cytometry. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (143), e58431 (2019).
  15. Djaoud, Z., et al. Two alternate strategies for innate immunity to Epstein-Barr virus: One using NK cells and the other NK cells and gammadelta T cells. Journal of Experimental Medicine. 214 (6), 1827-1841 (2017).
  16. Nakid-Cordero, C., Baron, M., Guihot, A., Vieillard, V. Natural killer cells in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Cancers. 13 (8), 1836 (2021).
  17. Forrest, C., Hislop, A. D., Rickinson, A. B., Zuo, J. Proteome-wide analysis of CD8+ T cell responses to EBV reveals differences between primary and persistent infection. PLoS Pathogens. 14 (9), 1007110 (2018).
  18. Zamai, L., et al. Understanding the Synergy of NKp46 and co-activating signals in various NK cell subpopulations: paving the way for more successful NK-cell-based immunotherapy. Cells. 9 (3), 753 (2020).
  19. Lam, J. K. P., et al. Emergence of CD4+ and CD8+ polyfunctional T cell responses against immunodominant lytic and latent EBV antigens in children with primary EBV infection. Frontiers In Microbiology. 9, 416 (2018).
  20. Choi, I. K., et al. Signaling by the Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 protein induces potent cytotoxic CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115 (4), 686-695 (2018).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Immune Cell SubpopulationsInfectious MononucleosisEBV InfectionPBMCsMagnetic SeparationCD 14 MicrobeadsCentrifugationTranscriptome SequencingFluorescently Labeled AntibodiesNegative Control SampleSingle Staining Samples

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved