A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Here, we present a comprehensive behavioral test battery, including the novel tank, Shoaling, and social preference tests, to effectively determine the potential neurotoxic effects of chemicals (e.g., methamphetamine and glyphosate) on adult zebrafish using a single tank. This method is relevant to neurotoxicity and environmental research.

Abstract

The presence of neuropathological effects proved to be, for many years, the main endpoint for assessing the neurotoxicity of a chemical substance. However, in the last 50 years, the effects of chemicals on the behavior of model species have been actively investigated. Progressively, behavioral endpoints were incorporated into neurotoxicological screening protocols, and these functional outcomes are now routinely used to identify and determine the potential neurotoxicity of chemicals. Behavioral assays in adult zebrafish provide a standardized and reliable means to study a wide range of behaviors, including anxiety, social interaction, learning, memory, and addiction. Behavioral assays in adult zebrafish typically involve placing the fish in an experimental arena and recording and analyzing their behavior using video tracking software. Fish can be exposed to various stimuli, and their behavior can be quantified using a variety of metrics. The novel tank test is one of the most accepted and widely used tests to study anxiety-like behavior in fish. The shoaling and social preference tests are useful in studying the social behavior of zebrafish. This assay is particularly interesting since the behavior of the entire shoal is studied. These assays have proven to be highly reproducible and sensitive to pharmacological and genetic manipulations, making them valuable tools for studying the neural circuits and molecular mechanisms underlying behavior. Additionally, these assays can be used in drug screening to identify compounds that may be potential modulators of behavior.

We will show in this work how to apply behavioral tools in fish neurotoxicology, analyzing the effect of methamphetamine, a recreational drug, and glyphosate, an environmental pollutant. The results demonstrate the significant contribution of behavioral assays in adult zebrafish to the understanding of the neurotoxicological effects of environmental pollutants and drugs, in addition to providing insights into the molecular mechanisms that may alter neuronal function.

Introduction

The zebrafish (Danio rerio) is a popular model vertebrate species for ecotoxicology, drug discovery, and safety pharmacology studies. Its low cost, well-established molecular genetic tools, and conservation of key physiological processes involved in the morphogenesis and maintenance of the nervous system make zebrafish an ideal animal model for neuroscience research, including neurobehavioral toxicology1,2. The main endpoint for evaluating the neurotoxicity of a chemical was, until recently, the presence of neuropathological effects. Lately, however, behavioral endpoints have been incorporated into neurotoxicological screening protocols, and these functional outcomes are now commonly used to identify and determine the potential neurotoxicity of chemicals3,4. Moreover, behavioral endpoints are highly relevant from an ecological point of view, as even a very mild behavioral change in fish could endanger the survival of the animal in natural conditions5.

One of the most used behavioral assays in adult zebrafish research is the novel tank test (NTT), which measures anxiety-like behavior6,7. In this assay, fish are exposed to novelty (fish are placed in an unfamiliar tank), a mild aversive stimulus and their behavioral responses are observed. NTT is used to assess basal locomotor activity, geotaxis, freezing, and erratic movements of fish, principally. Erratic8 is characterized by abrupt changes of direction (zigzagging) and repeated episodes of accelerations (darting). It is an alarm reaction and is usually observed before or after freezing episodes. Freezing behavior corresponds to a complete cessation of the fish's movements (except for opercular and ocular movements) while on the bottom of the tank, as distinguished from immobility caused by sedation, which causes hypolocomotion, akinesia, and sinking8. Freezing is usually related to a high state of stress and anxiety and is also part of submissive behavior. Complex behaviors are excellent indicators of the state of anxiety of animals. NTT has been shown to be sensitive to pharmacological and genetic manipulation9, making it a valuable tool for studying the neural basis of anxiety and related disorders.

Zebrafish are a highly social species, so we can measure a wide range of social behaviors. The shoaling test (ST) and the social preference test (SPT) are the most used assays to assess social behavior10. The ST measures the tendency of fish to group together11 by quantifying their spatial behavior and movement patterns. ST is useful for studying group dynamics, leadership, social learning, and understanding the social behavior of many fish species12. The SPT in adult zebrafish was adapted from Crawley's preference for social novelty test for mice13 and quickly became a popular behavioral assay for the study of social interaction in this model species14. These two tests have also been adapted for use in drug screening assays and have shown promise for identifying novel compounds that modulate social behavior15,16.

In general, behavioral assays in adult zebrafish are powerful tools that can provide valuable information on the behavior mechanisms or the neurophenotypes of active compounds and abused drugs17. This protocol details how to implement these behavioral tools7 with basic material resources and how to apply them in toxicity assays to characterize the effects of a wide range of neuroactive compounds. In addition, we will see that the same tests can be applied to assess the neurobehavioral effects of acute exposure to a neuroactive compound (methamphetamine) but also to characterize these effects after chronic exposure to environmental concentrations of a pesticide (glyphosate).

Protocol

Strict compliance with ethical standards guarantees the welfare and proper treatment of the zebrafish used for experimentation. All experimental procedures were carried out under the guidelines established by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (CID-CSIC). The protocols and results presented below were performed under the license granted by the local government (agreement number 11336).

1. Animal housing for behavioral testing

  1. Perform all tests (presented in Figure 1) in an isolated behavioral room at 27-28 °C between 10:00 and 17:00.
  2. Wash both control and exposed fish several times in clean fish water [reverse-osmosis purified water containing 90 mg/L aquarium systems salt, 0.58 mM CaSO4·2H2O, and 0.59 mM NaHCO3] before starting the experiments to avoid any potential contamination of the experimental tank.
  3. Acclimate animals to the behavior room 1 h before starting the experiments.
  4. Ensure that the animals (≈50:50 male: female ratio) are experimentally naïve and perform all behavioral testing in a blind manner with observers unaware of the experimental group.
  5. To obtain meaningful results in behavioral assays, have a total number of 18 subjects per condition (n = 18), ideally obtained between two or more independent experiments. For example, in individual tests, analyze the behavior of 9 animals per condition, per replicate. In group tests, analyze the behavior of a shoal of 6 to 9 animals per condition, per replicate.
  6. Carry out all tests following a battery test approach (see planning proposals in Figure 2). Ethically more suitable, this method allows to reduce the number of animals needed for the study, complying with the 3R reduction principle7.
  7. Most of the time, behavioral assays are connected to biological assays, so sacrifice the animals following euthanasia guidelines18 before collecting and analyzing samples (OMICs or chemicals). If the endpoint does not prove to be sampling, re-stable the control group at the end of the experiment. Reuse the control animals for breeding or experimental purposes after a few days.

figure-protocol-2450
Figure 1: Experimental setups. Three configurations of the square tank to study a wide range of behaviors in adult zebrafish. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

figure-protocol-2937
Figure 2: Experimental timeline. Two planning proposals for the recording of behavioral assays. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

2. Experimental configurations of the tank

  1. Anxiety-like behavior: The Novel Tank Test (NTT)
    1. Adjust the experimental setup (number of tanks, cameras, and computers) to record the maximum number of fish simultaneously. Individual behavior assays are time-consuming, so optimize time, material, and space.
    2. Prepare the experimental tanks for NTT: Square tank (20 cm length, 20 cm width, 25 cm height) covered with acrylic panels on lateral walls and bottom to avoid reflection and interference between subjects.
    3. Fill the experimental tanks with 7 L (water column height: 20 cm height) of well-oxygenated fish water at 28 °C.
    4. Adjust the position of the tank in front of the camera to avoid distorted image.
    5. Check the illumination setup. LED backlight (10000 lux) provide a homogenate illumination on all part of the tank for video recording in good conditions.
    6. Turn on the cameras and adjust them following section 3.
    7. Introduce the subjects, one by one, into the bottom of the experimental tanks before starting to record as quickly as possible.
      NOTE: It is important to start recording with the animal at the bottom of the tank.
    8. Take care not to disturb the animals during recording. Use of a curtain or panel to limit visual interaction not only between tanks but also between the support and the outside.
    9. At the end of the recording (standard recording time is 6 min), transfer the animals that have already passed through the test to another tank so as not to mix them with the naïve animals.
    10. Repeat the procedure with all available subjects. It is advisable to have a total number of 18 subjects per condition to obtain meaningful results in individual trials (from two or more independent replicates).
    11. Randomize the experimental group assigned to each tank between trials to avoid any potential tank effects (if you are recording several conditions at the same time).
  2. Social grouped behavior: The Shoaling Test (ST)
    1. The experimental configuration of ST is the same as that of NTT (the same tanks can be reused directly).
    2. Follow the steps 2.1.1-2.1.6. to set up the ST.
    3. Introduce the shoal (6 to 9 subjects at the same time) at the bottom of the experimental tanks before starting to record as quickly as possible.
      NOTE: It is important to start recording with the animal at the bottom of the tank.
    4. Follow the steps 2.1.8-2.1.11. to perform the ST.
    5. Repeat the procedure with all available subjects. To obtain meaningful results in this assay, make at least two independent replicates with the same bank size in each replicate.
    6. Maintain the size of the shoal consistent for all the experimental groups and replicates inside the same experiment.
  3. Social individual behavior: The Social Preference Test (SPT) 
    1. Adjust the experimental setup to optimize the experimental space and time of recording.
    2. Prepare the experimental tanks for SPT: Square tank (20 cm length, 20 cm width, 25 cm height) transparent (glass or plastic) to offer lateral visibility. The single focal fish is free to interact with a conspecific virtual zone - a fish's shoal placed into the one-sided external housing tank, or with the unspecific virtual zone - a one-sided external empty housing tank.
    3. Fill the experimental tanks with 5 L (water column height: 15 cm, same height as the water column in the extern housing tanks) of clean fish water at 28 °C.
    4. Adjust the position of the tank in front of the camera to avoid distorted image.
    5. Check that the system receives homogeneous lighting.
    6. Introduce the subjects, one by one, into the bottom of the experimental tanks before immediately starting recording with the animal down in the center.
    7. Avoid visual interactions between observers and animals during recording.
    8. At the end of the 6 min recording, transfer the present animals to another tank so as not to mix them with the naïve animals.
    9. Repeat the procedure with all available subjects. Have a total number of 18 subjects per condition to obtain meaningful results in individual trials (from two or more independent replicates).

3. Video recording for behavioral tests

  1. Open the camera manager to check the availability of the GigE camera on each computer.
  2. Launch the GigE camera controlling software (such as uEye Cockpit, described here). Open the Camera option, select Monochrome mode, and adjust the image size (1:2).
  3. Open Camera Properties
    1. Under Camera, set the Pixel Clock to Maximum, set the Frame Rate to 30 frames per second (fps), and adjust the Exposure (Auto or Manual adjust if the image is too dark).
    2. Under Image, set the Gain to 0 (Auto) and the Black Levels (Auto or Manual adjust to obtain a good contrast).
    3. Under Size, adjust the size of the window to the region that needs to be engraved (Width: Width-Left, Height: Height-Top). This step allows to reduce the size of the image and, therefore, the final size of the video.
    4. Close Camera Properties.
  4. Create a general folder for the experiment session to save the camera settings and videos.
  5. To save the camera settings, set File > Save Parameters > To File and select the experiment folder recently created.
    NOTE: The camera settings file can thus be reloaded in the application to continue working with the same image parameters at any time (e.g. when the camera is suddenly switched off or to reuse the same settings, reducing the setup time and homogenizing the experimental conditions). If, in one moment, the camera freezes between videos, stop recording, exit, and turn off the camera. Turn it back on, reload the camera parameters by going to File > Load Parameters > To File, and restart recording. Check if the current video has been completely acquired to discard or repeat the fish (before repeat, give the animals some time to re-acclimatize).
  6. Repeat this camera setup procedure (steps 3.1-3.5) on all the cameras.
  7. When all the cameras are correctly configured, open Record Video Sequence.
  8. Select Create to save as a new video file, select the experiment folder recently created, and report in the name of the video file the information of the subject, type of experiment, and the date.
  9. Select Max. Frames. Type 10800 in the frame box. Standard video is recording 6 min (Video 1) at 30 fps in AVI format; therefore, 6 min x 60 s x 30 fps= 10800 frames in total.
  10. Select Calc. Frame Rate or indicate the frame rate manually (velocity of recording: 30 fps).
  11. Repeat the video file creation procedure on all the computers.
  12. Introduce the subjects, one by one, at the bottom of each experimental tanks. All assays will be run at once.
  13. Start the records quickly by clicking on Record and wait to get the maximum number of requested frames (step 3.10).
  14. Once the videos are recorded, a chat box appears with the message Maximal number of frames achieved!. Select Accept.
  15. Select Close to finish the recording and close the video file.
  16. Remove the fish that have just been observed. Be careful to separate them from the naive fish.
  17. Directly select Create and repeat the process to continue recording videos.
  18. Once all the recordings are done, select Exit.
  19. To turn off the cameras, select Close Camera and Exit the program.

4. Analysis of recorded videos

  1. Launch the analysis software (see Table of Materials).
  2. To elaborate on a new template, click on New from Template > Applied a Predefined Template > From Video File, and select a video to start setting up the template. Try to choose a representative video of the experiment with a subject exhibiting good mobility and good conditions of recording.
  3. In Parameters, configure the parameters in the following windows (1 to 4/7). Select the model Fish > Adult Zebrafish, the arena Open Field Square > One Arena, the number of Subject per Arena (for the ST, a multi tracking package [track various subjects in one arena] is required), the type of Detection by Center-Point and finally adjust the frame rate to 30 fps. In the following windows (5 to 7/7), do not change parameters; default configuration is OK.
  4. Name the experiment as a template and place it in the same folder as the rest of the stored video. The template will be created as an experiment folder with several subdivisions containing all the setup information.
  5. Under Experiment Settings, check the defined setup (from video file, arena, number of subjects, frame per seconds). Here, the system units can be modified.
  6. Under Arena Settings, right-click on the center of the screen and select Grab. From File in the display. Choose a good quality video image and Accept to capture this image for the background settings. First, Calibrate the image, generating a calibrated rule. Use the width of the tank as a scale (19 cm). Then, draw the arena. Be careful to make the square just enough to avoid the reflections of the animal when the latter approaches the surface or any eventual confusion of the fish software with the black areas of the tank. Finally, draw the shape zones with the Frame function.
    1. For NTT and ST, divide the front of the tank into two equal virtual zones, top, and bottom (see Figure 1). Draw two equal horizontal boxes. Boxes cover half an arena for each one. Name the Top and Bottom for the upper and lower zones, respectively. Be careful that the boxes have the same width (9-10 cm) and length (8-9 cm), do not exceed arena boundaries (orange square), and do not overlap, checking that each arrow zone indicates exactly its zones.
    2. For SPT, divide the experimental arena conceptually into three equal-sized zones: empty, center, and conspecific (see Figure 1). Draw three equal vertical boxes. Name the box oriented to the shoal tank as Conspecific, the box oriented to the empty tank as Empty, and the middle one as Center. Be careful that the boxes have the same width (6 cm) and length (18-19 cm), do not exceed arena limits, and do not overlap.
  7. Under Detection Settings, verify which video to be dealt with in the Video File. Then, check detection quality (fish in yellow, red center point). Click on Auto Detect to adjust the detection, refocusing the animal (choose an image that the animal is swimming in profile on the white background, draw the picture by taking its entire body, and validate the detection with Yes). Open Advanced to improve detection by selecting Dynamic Subtraction, Darker Subject, Background Settings, Background Learning, Subject Size, Noise Reduction, etc.
  8. Under Trials Settings, put one trial and delete the others (right-click and delete)
  9. Under Data Settings, create Results dialog windows. Parameterize Results per time and per zone. For example, create one Results window for data output by minutes and another for data output by total time (6 min). Request the data output for each zone (request it if the distance in each zone is needed). Link the different Results windows to the Start window with arrows.
  10. Under Analyze Settings, select the Parameters to analyze and the type of Statistics for each parameter. These parameters will be automatically calculated based on the data acquired from the tracking.
    1. For NTT and SPT, select options as defined below:
      1. Select Distance Moved (select Total) to obtain the distance traveled in the arena (cm) and the distance traveled in the respective zones (cm).
      2. Select In Zones (select Zones, Frequency, Cumulative, and Latency to First) to have the time spent in the zones (s) and the latency to first entrance in the zones (s).
      3. Select Zone Transition (select Threshold: 0 cm, Add Zone 1 > Zone 2; Zone 2 > Zone 1, in any zones, Frequency) to obtain the number of entrances in the zones.
      4. Select Mobility Sate (fill in High mobile above 70%, Immobile below 3%, minimum 150 frames, and select frequency, cumulative, and latency to first) to have the duration of hypermobility (s), the duration of freezing (s).
        NOTE: See the Discussion section for more details about the approximation of freezing behavior using the automated analysis and the number and duration (s) of freezing episodes.
      5. Select Acceleration and Turn Angle (select frequency and cumulative) to evaluate the occurrence of complex behaviors such as darting and erratic (fast acceleration movements).
    2. For the ST, in addition to the above exploratory parameters, select the option Distance Between Subjects (select all the subjects, mean, maximum, minimum) to get the average distance between fish (cm), the average distance between the nearest neighbor (cm), and the average distance between the farthest neighbor.
  11. The template is ready for its use. Save the last modifications and Close the template without acquiring any data from the video (maintain the template file; it is light and easy to manage and copy). If there are several software licenses, analyze the videos from the same template copied to each computer.
  12. To copy and use the template, there are two options:
    1. Open the template file with the behavior analysis software, go to File > Save as to create a new identical file.
    2. In the welcome interface, select New from Template > Applied a Custom Template > From Video File (choose template. EthXV file). Name the new experiment and select its location. The software may take a few minutes to copy the information from the template file.
  13. Go to Arena Settings to re-adjust the template if the video was recorded with a different camera (follow steps 4.6 and 4.7).
  14. Go to Detection Settings or Acquisition to check which video is selected and change the video file if necessary.
  15. Under Acquisition, select DDS > Ready to Start. It may take a few minutes for the software to process the video.
  16. When the acquisition is finished, go to Track Editor. Select acceleration x16 to read the processed video faster and check if the tracking is correct.
    NOTE: Sometimes, there may be "losses" in the tracking (due to reflections or confusion of the software itself). They can be edited manually from this part if they are few; otherwise, it is preferable to reprocess the whole experiment, improving the definition of the canvas and the detection.
  17. Under Statistics, click on Calculate > Export Data. Data exportation is directly located in the experiment folder.
  18. Under Track Visualization or Heatmaps, generate and export (right click, export image, select the folder Export Files of the experiment to save this data with the spreadsheet report) tracking images of the animal.
  19. Go to File to close the active experiment and repeat this procedure for the next video.

5. Statistical analysis

  1. Analyze the normality (Shapiro-Wilk test) of data in each group.
  2. Assess homoscedasticity with Levene's test.
  3. Use one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's and Tukey's multiple comparison tests to test differences between groups when criteria of normality and homoscedasticity cannot be rejected.
  4. Use the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by a pairwise comparison using the Bonferroni correction to test differences between groups when criteria of normality and homoscedasticity are rejected.
  5. Plot the data with graphical software.

Results

In this section, we will look at some possible applications of these behavioral tools in fish neurotoxicology. The following results correspond to the characterization of the acute or binge effects of methamphetamine (METH), a recreational drug, and the sub-chronic effects of glyphosate, one of the main herbicides found in aquatic ecosystems.

Characterization of a methamphetamine binge neurotoxicity model in adult zebrafish
When evaluating the effect of 40 mg/L METH on N...

Discussion

Characteristic anxiety behaviors observed in NTT have been positively correlated with serotonin levels analyzed in brains21. For example, after exposure to para-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA), an inhibitor of 5-HT biosynthesis, fish exhibited positive geotaxis as well as decreased brain 5-HT levels22, results very similar to those obtained with METH. Therefore, the decrease in brain serotonin levels and the display of positive geotaxis in METH-exposed zebrafish suggests that th...

Disclosures

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by "Agencia Estatal de Investigación" from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (project PID2020-113371RB-C21), IDAEA-CSIC, Severo Ochoa Centre of Excellence (CEX2018-000794-S). Juliette Bedrossiantz was supported by a PhD grant (PRE2018-083513) co-financed by the Spanish Government and the European Social Fund (ESF).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Aquarium Cube shapeBlau Aquaristic7782025Cubic Panoramic 10  (10 L, 20 cm x 20 cm x 25 cm, 5 mm)
Ethovision softwareNoldusEthovision XTVersion 12.0 or newer
GigE cameraImaging Development SystemsUI-5240CP-NIR-GL
GraphPad Prism 9.02GraphPad software IncGraphPad Prism 9.02 For Windows
IDS camera managerImaging Development Systems
LED backlight illuminationQuirumedGP-G2
SPSS SoftwareIBMIBM SPSS v26
uEye Cockpit software Imaging Development Systemsversion 4.90

References

  1. Raldúa, D., Piña, B. In vivo zebrafish assays for analyzing drug toxicity. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology. 10 (5), 685-697 (2014).
  2. Faria, M., Prats, E., Bellot, M., Gomez-Canela, C., Raldúa, D. Pharmacological modulation of serotonin levels in zebrafish larvae: Lessons for identifying environmental neurotoxicants targeting the serotonergic system. Toxics. 9 (6), 118 (2021).
  3. Faria, M., et al. Zebrafish models for human acute organophosphorus poisoning. Scientific Reports. 5, 15591 (2015).
  4. Faria, M., et al. Glyphosate targets fish monoaminergic systems leading to oxidative stress and anxiety. Environment International. 146, 106253 (2021).
  5. Faria, M., et al. Screening anti-predator behaviour in fish larvae exposed to environmental pollutants. Science of the Total Environment. 714, 136759 (2020).
  6. Faria, M., et al. Acrylamide acute neurotoxicity in adult zebrafish. Scientific Reports. 8 (1), 7918 (2018).
  7. Kalueff, A. V., Stewart, A. M. Zebrafish Protocols for Neurobehavioral Research. Neuromethods. , (2012).
  8. Kalueff, A. V., et al. Towards a comprehensive catalog of zebrafish behavior 1.0 and beyond. Zebrafish. 10 (1), 70-86 (2013).
  9. Egan, R. J., et al. Understanding behavioral and physiological phenotypes of stress and anxiety in zebrafish. Behavioural Brain Research. 205, 38-44 (2009).
  10. . Social behavior in Zebrafish Available from: https://www.noldus.com/applications/social-behavior-zebrafish (2012)
  11. Green, J., et al. Automated high-throughput neurophenotyping of zebrafish social behavior. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 210 (2), 266-271 (2012).
  12. Miller, N., Gerlai, R. Quantification of shoaling behaviour in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behavioural Brain Research. 184 (2), 157-166 (2007).
  13. Landin, J., et al. Oxytocin receptors regulate social preference in zebrafish. Scientific Reports. 10 (1), 5435 (2020).
  14. Ogi, A., et al. Social preference tests in zebrafish: A systematic review. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 7, 590057 (2021).
  15. Bedrossiantz, J., et al. A zebrafish model of neurotoxicity by binge-like methamphetamine exposure. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 12, 770319 (2021).
  16. Hamilton, T. J., Krook, J., Szaszkiewicz, J., Burggren, W. Shoaling, boldness, anxiety-like behavior and locomotion in zebrafish (Danio rerio) are altered by acute benzo[a]pyrene exposure. Science of the Total Environment. 774, 145702 (2021).
  17. Kane, A. S., Salierno, J. D., Brewer, S. K. Chapter 32. Fish models in behavioral toxicology: Automated Techniques, Updates, and Perspectives Methods in Aquatic Toxicology. Volume2, (2005).
  18. Faria, M., et al. Glyphosate targets fish monoaminergic systems leading to oxidative stress and anxiety. Environment International. 146, 106253 (2021).
  19. Maximino, C., Costa, B., Lima, M. A review of monoaminergic neuropsychopharmacology in zebrafish, 6 years later: Towards paradoxes and their solution. Current Psychopharmacology. 5 (2), 96-138 (2016).
  20. Maximino, C., et al. Role of serotonin in zebrafish (Danio rerio) anxiety: Relationship with serotonin levels and effect of buspirone, WAY 100635, SB 224289, fluoxetine and para-chlorophenylalanine (pCPA) in two behavioral models. Neuropharmacology. 71, 83-97 (2013).
  21. Faria, M., et al. Therapeutic potential of N-acetylcysteine in acrylamide acute neurotoxicity in adult zebrafish. Scientific Reports. 9 (1), 16467 (2019).
  22. Homer, B. D., Solomon, T. M., Moeller, R. W., Mascia, A., DeRaleau, L., Halkitis, P. N. Methamphetamine abuse and impairment of social functioning: A review of the underlying neurophysiological causes and behavioral implications. Psychological Bulletin. 134 (2), 301-310 (2008).
  23. Linker, A., et al. Assessing the maximum predictive validity for neuropharmacological anxiety screening assays using zebrafish. Neuromethods. 51, 181-190 (2011).
  24. Hartung, T. From alternative methods to a new toxicology. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 77 (3), 338-349 (2011).
  25. Cachat, J. M., Kalueff, A., Cachat, J., et al. Video-Aided Analysis of Zebrafish Locomotion and Anxiety-Related Behavioral Responses. Zebrafish Neurobehavioral Protocols. Neuromethods. 51, (2011).
  26. Rosemberg, D. B., et al. Differences in spatio-temporal behavior of zebrafish in the open tank paradigm after a short-period confinement into dark and bright environments. PLoS ONE. 6 (5), e19397 (2011).
  27. Blaser, R., Gerlai, R. Behavioral phenotyping in Zebrafish: Comparison of three behavioral quantification methods. Behavioral Research Methods. 38 (3), 456-469 (2006).
  28. Cachat, J., et al. Three-dimensional neurophenotyping of adult zebrafish behavior. PLoS ONE. 6 (3), e17597 (2011).
  29. Cachat, J. M., et al. Deconstructing adult zebrafish behavior with swim trace visualizations. Neuromethods. 51, 191-201 (2011).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Neurotoxicity AssessmentDanio RerioBehavioral TestsEnvironmental PollutantsDrugsAdult ZebrafishAnxiety like BehaviorNeurotoxicological ScreeningMolecular Initiating EventChemical ModelsParkinson s DiseaseBehavioral EndpointsSocial InteractionLearning And MemoryAddictionVideo Tracking SoftwareExperimental Arena

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved