Najmeh Nikpour and Fiona Alum provided suggestions and edited this manuscript. Department of Biochemistry at McGill University supported HM and VM with the CIHR Training Initiative in Chemical Biology. This work was supported by Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) grant 119464 (to R. S.).

The protocol below describes the procedure for performing the fluorescence-based RNA editing assay. The assay can be performed in a single PCR tube, 96-well, or 384-well plates depending on the scope of the experiment. Subsequently the fluorescence signal can be read on a suitable real time PCR detection system. The assay here is described in the context of 384-well plates.
1. Culturing T. brucei Cells
<ol>
	<li>Prepare a growth medium for T. brucei procyclic form cells. For 1 L of medium:
	<ol>
		<li>Dissolve 25.4 g SDM-79 powder in 800 ml miliQ water.</li>
		<li>Add 2 g of NaHCO3 and pH to 7.3 with 10 M NaOH.</li>
		<li>Add nanopure water to a final volume of 900 ml, filter sterilize.</li>
		<li>Add Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), penicillin-streptomycin solution and hemin (2.5 mg/ml) to final concentrations of 10% (v/v), 100 U/ml and 7.5 mg/L respectively.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Grow 300 ml of T. brucei 1.7A wild type (procyclic form) cells at 28 &#176;C, shaking at 70 rpm to a density of 1.5 x 107 cells/ml. NOTE: This should produce 3 ml of active editosome with ~0.5 mg of total protein, sufficient for 600 editing reactions.</li>
	<li>Harvest the cells by centrifugation at 6,000 x g for 10 min at 4 &#176;C.</li>
	<li>Wash the pellet with 50 ml of chilled PBSG buffer (10 mM Na2HPO4, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 145 mM NaCl, and 6 mM glucose), and spin down the cells again by centrifugation at 10,000 x g for 10 min at 4 &#176;C.</li>
</ol>
2. Isolation of Crude Mitochondria
NOTE: All the steps should be performed on ice or at 4 &#176;C to preserve editosome activity.
<ol>
	<li>Resuspend the harvested cells in 30 ml of DTE buffer (1 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 and 1 mM EDTA). Use a 40 ml sterile Dounce homogenizer (pre-chilled) to disrupt the cell membrane by stroking up and down at least 10 times on ice.</li>
	<li>Immediately add 4.3 ml of 60% sucrose (w/v; i.e. 1.75 M) to the homogenate to a final concentration of 0.25 M. Centrifuge at 15,800 x g for 10 min at 4 &#176;C, to preferentially bring down mitochondria.</li>
	<li>Resuspend the mitochondrial pellet in 4.6 ml of STM buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 250 mM sucrose and 2 mM MgCl2). Add 13.8 &#956;l of 0.1 M CaCl2 and 4 &#956;l of RNase-free DNase I to final concentrations of 0.3 mM and 9 U/ml, respectively. Incubate the mixture for 1 hr on ice.</li>
	<li>Add 4.6 ml of STE buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 250 mM sucrose and 2 mM EDTA) to inactivate the DNase I. Centrifuge at 15,800 x g for 10 min at 4 &#176;C.</li>
	<li>Resuspend the pellet in 400 &#956;l of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.2, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 1 &#181;g/ml pepstatin, 1 mM DTT, and 1x complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor) and transfer to a microfuge tube.</li>
	<li>Add 10% Triton X-100 to a final concentration of 1% and incubate the lysate for 15 min at 4 &#176;C on a tube rotator.</li>
	<li>Clear the mitochondrial lysate by centrifuging twice at 17,000 x g for 15 min at 4&#160;&#176;C; retaining the cleared supernatant each time.</li>
</ol>
3. Editosome Purification
<ol>
	<li>Pour a 10 ml 10%-30% (v/v) linear glycerol gradient (Table 1) in an ultracentrifuge tube using 2x HHE gradient buffer (40 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 20 mM Mg(OAc)2, 100 mM KCl, and 2 mM EDTA) and a gradient maker by following the instruction manual.</li>
	<li>Carefully remove 500 &#956;l of solution from the top of the glycerol gradient and gently load 500 &#956;l of the cleared mitochondrial lysate. Spin at 178,000 x g for 6 hr at 4 &#176;C using an ultracentrifuge.</li>
	<li>Collect 500 &#181;l fractions sequentially from the top to the bottom of the gradient at 4 &#176;C. Then snap freeze the fractions using liquid nitrogen and store at -80 &#176;C until usage.</li>
</ol>
4. RNA Preparation
<ol>
	<li>Anneal the respective DNA template containing sequence complementary to T7 promoter sequence (Table 2) with a T7 promoter oligonucleotide (5&#8217;-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG-3&#8217;) in a 1:1 molar ratio by heating at 90 &#176;C for 3 min and cooling at RT for at least 10 min.</li>
	<li>Transcribe RNA using an in vitro transcription kit by following the instruction manual.</li>
	<li>Stop the transcription reaction by adding equal volume of 7 M urea dye (7 M urea, 0.05% Xylene Cynol, and 0.05% Bromophenol blue). Run on a filter sterilized 9% denaturing polyacrylamide gel (9% acrylamide, 7 M urea, 1x TBE) .</li>
	<li>Use the ultraviolet (UV) shadowing with a shortwave UV lamp to locate and excise respective RNA. Place the excised gel piece in a microfuge tube and add 400 &#181;l of gel elution buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 250 mM NaOAc, 1 mM EDTA and 0.25% SDS). Elute overnight at RT on a tube rotator.</li>
	<li>Precipitate the eluted RNA by adding 1 ml of cold 100% ethanol and incubating either at -80 &#176;C for 30 min or -20 &#176;C overnight.</li>
	<li>Centrifuge at 16,000 x g for 30 min at 4 &#176;C, to pellet down the RNA.</li>
	<li>Wash the pellet with 1 ml of 75% ethanol. Centrifuge at 16,000 x g for 20 min at 4 &#176;C.</li>
	<li>Resuspend the RNA pellet appropriately in RNase free water to achieve the desired concentrations, as shown in Table 2.</li>
</ol>
5. Fluorescence-based RNA Editing Assay
<ol>
	<li>For a single reaction, combine 1 pmol (1 &#181;l) of preA6Rbz and 2.5 pmol (1 &#181;l) of gA6Rbz (1:2.5 molar ratio) in a microfuge tube, incubate at 70 &#186;C for 3 min and let it sit at RT for at least 10 min.</li>
	<li>Meanwhile prepare a master mix using Table 3, without the preA6Rbz and gA6Rbz, for the editing reaction containing 1x HHE buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 10 mM Mg(OAc)2, 50 mM KCl and 10 mM EDTA), 1 mM ATP, 5 mM CaCl2, 16 ng/&#181;l of Torula yeast RNA, 0.1% Triton X-100, and the purified editosome.</li>
	<li>Add annealed preA6Rbz and gA6Rbz to complete the master mix.</li>
	<li>Dispense 18 &#181;l of the master mix (Table 3) into wells containing either 2 &#181;l of RNase-free water (wells with no compounds) or 2 &#181;l of 200 &#181;M chemical compounds and include control samples in the plate according to Figure 5.</li>
	<li>Seal the plate with a plate sealer and spin the plate down, to remove any air bubbles. Incubate at 28 &#176;C for 4 hr.</li>
	<li>Add 25 pmol (2 &#181;l) of gA6Rbz competitor to each well. Place a fresh sealer, spin the plate down and place it on a real-time PCR machine. Program the following experiment: 
	Step 1: 85 &#176;C for 5 min; Step 2: 24 &#176;C for 10 min; Step 3: Stop.</li>
	<li>Add 15 pmol (1 &#181;l) of FRET substrate to each well to a final volume of 23 &#181;l. Seal the plate with a fresh sealer. Quickly spin the plate and place it back on the real-time PCR machine.</li>
	<li>Program a new experiment with the following steps: 
	Step 1: 37 &#176;C for 1 min; Step 2: Read; Step 3: Go to Step 1, 40 times; Step 4: Stop.</li>
	<li>Setup the plate by selecting all the wells that require reading and choose the FAM filter. Input volume as 23 &#956;l and start the run.</li>
	<li>Calculate the slope of the values obtained from each well/sample to obtain a kinetic measurement by plotting the slopes on a bar graph for analysis. NOTE: A kinetic read improves the signal-to-noise ratio between the sample and the background; as the background sample would have a slope close to zero. An end point reading has higher background noise.</li>
</ol>

<ol>
	<li>Benne, R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=transcript+of+the+frameshifted+coxII+gene+from+trypanosome+mitochondria+contains+four+nucleotides+that+are+not+encoded+in+the+DNA.">transcript of the frameshifted coxII gene from trypanosome mitochondria contains four nucleotides that are not encoded in the DNA.</a> Cell. 46, 819-826 (1986).</li><li>Hajduk, S., Ochsenreiter, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=RNA+editing+in+kinetoplastids.">RNA editing in kinetoplastids.</a> RNA biology. 7, 229-236 (2010).</li><li>Aphasizhev, R., Aphasizheva, I. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Uridine+insertion/deletion+editing+in+trypanosomes:+a+playground+for+RNA-guided+information+transfer.">Uridine insertion/deletion editing in trypanosomes: a playground for RNA-guided information transfer.</a> Wiley interdisciplinary reviews RNA. 2, 669-685 (2011).</li><li>Seiwert, S. D., Stuart, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=RNA+editing:+transfer+of+genetic+information+from+gRNA+to+precursor+mRNA+in+vitro.">RNA editing: transfer of genetic information from gRNA to precursor mRNA in vitro.</a> Science. 266, 114-117 (1994).</li><li>Weng, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Guide+RNA-binding+complex+from+mitochondria+of+trypanosomatids.">Guide RNA-binding complex from mitochondria of trypanosomatids.</a> Molecular. 32, 198-209 (2008).</li><li>Hashimi, H., Zikova, A., Panigrahi, A. K., Stuart, K. D., Lukes, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=TbRGG1,+an+essential+protein+involved+in+kinetoplastid+RNA+metabolism+that+is+associated+with+a+novel+multiprotein+complex.">TbRGG1, an essential protein involved in kinetoplastid RNA metabolism that is associated with a novel multiprotein complex.</a> RNA. 14, 970-980 (2008).</li><li>Ammerman, M. L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Architecture+of+the+trypanosome+RNA+editing+accessory+complex,+MRB1.">Architecture of the trypanosome RNA editing accessory complex, MRB1.</a> Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 5637-5650 (2012).</li><li>Huang, C. E., O'Hearn, S. F., Sollner-Webb, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Assembly+and+function+of+the+RNA+editing+complex+in+Trypanosoma+brucei+requires+band+III+protein.">Assembly and function of the RNA editing complex in Trypanosoma brucei requires band III protein.</a> Molecular and cellular biology. 22, 3194-3203 (2002).</li><li>Carnes, J., Trotter, J. R., Peltan, A., Fleck, M., Stuart, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=RNA+editing+in+Trypanosoma+brucei+requires+three+different+editosomes.">RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei requires three different editosomes.</a> Molecular and cellular biology. 28, 122-130 (2008).</li><li>Hearn, S. F., Huang, C. E., Hemann, M., Zhelonkina, A., Sollner-Webb, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Trypanosoma+brucei+RNA+editing+complex:+band+II+is+structurally+critical+and+maintains+band+V+ligase,+which+is+nonessential.">Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing complex: band II is structurally critical and maintains band V ligase, which is nonessential.</a> Molecular and cellular biology. 23, 7909-7919 (2003).</li><li>Schnaufer, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=An+RNA+ligase+essential+for+RNA+editing+and+survival+of+the+bloodstream+form+of+Trypanosoma+brucei.">An RNA ligase essential for RNA editing and survival of the bloodstream form of Trypanosoma brucei.</a> Science. 291, 2159-2162 (2001).</li><li>Tarun, S. Z., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=KREPA6+is+an+RNA-binding+protein+essential+for+editosome+integrity+and+survival+of+Trypanosoma+brucei.">KREPA6 is an RNA-binding protein essential for editosome integrity and survival of Trypanosoma brucei.</a> RNA. 14, 347-358 (2008).</li><li>Croft, S. L., Barrett, M. P., Urbina, J. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Chemotherapy+of+trypanosomiases+and+leishmaniasis.">Chemotherapy of trypanosomiases and leishmaniasis.</a> Trends in parasitology. 21, 508-512 (2005).</li><li>Denise, H., Barrett, M. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Uptake+and+mode+of+action+of+drugs+used+against+sleeping+sickness.">Uptake and mode of action of drugs used against sleeping sickness.</a> Biochemical pharmacology. 61, 1-5 (2001).</li><li>Seiwert, S. D., Heidmann, S., Stuart, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Direct+visualization+of+uridylate+deletion+in+vitro+suggests+a+mechanism+for+kinetoplastid+RNA+editing.">Direct visualization of uridylate deletion in vitro suggests a mechanism for kinetoplastid RNA editing.</a> Cell. 84, 831-841 (1996).</li><li>Igo, R. P., Palazzo, S. S., Burgess, M. L., Panigrahi, A. K., Stuart, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Uridylate+addition+and+RNA+ligation+contribute+to+the+specificity+of+kinetoplastid+insertion+RNA+editing.">Uridylate addition and RNA ligation contribute to the specificity of kinetoplastid insertion RNA editing.</a> Molecular and cellular biology. 20, 8447-8457 (2000).</li><li>Igo, R. P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Role+of+uridylate-specific+exoribonuclease+activity+in+Trypanosoma+brucei+RNA+editing.">Role of uridylate-specific exoribonuclease activity in Trypanosoma brucei RNA editing.</a> Eukaryotic cell. 1, 112-118 (2002).</li><li>Wang, B., Salavati, R., Heidmann, S., Stuart, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+hammerhead+ribozyme+substrate+and+reporter+for+in+vitro+kinetoplastid+RNA+editing.">A hammerhead ribozyme substrate and reporter for in vitro kinetoplastid RNA editing.</a> RNA. 8, 548-554 (2002).</li><li>Moshiri, H., Salavati, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+fluorescence-based+reporter+substrate+for+monitoring+RNA+editing+in+trypanosomatid+pathogens.">A fluorescence-based reporter substrate for monitoring RNA editing in trypanosomatid pathogens.</a> Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e138 (2010).</li><li>Jenne, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Rapid+identification+and+characterization+of+hammerhead-ribozyme+inhibitors+using+fluorescence-based+technology.">Rapid identification and characterization of hammerhead-ribozyme inhibitors using fluorescence-based technology.</a> Nature. 19, 56-61 (2001).</li><li>Hartig, J. S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Protein-dependent+ribozymes+report+molecular+interactions+in+real+time.">Protein-dependent ribozymes report molecular interactions in real time.</a> Nature. 20, 717-722 (2002).</li><li>Famulok, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Allosteric+aptamers+and+aptazymes+as+probes+for+screening+approaches.">Allosteric aptamers and aptazymes as probes for screening approaches.</a> Current opinion in molecular therapeutics. 7, 137-143 (2005).</li><li>Teng, B., Burant, C. F., Davidson, N. O. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Molecular+cloning+of+an+apolipoprotein+B+messenger+RNA+editing+protein.">Molecular cloning of an apolipoprotein B messenger RNA editing protein.</a> Science. 260, 1816-1819 (1993).</li><li>Jurica, M. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Searching+for+a+wrench+to+throw+into+the+splicing+machine.">Searching for a wrench to throw into the splicing machine.</a> Nature chemical biology. 4, 3-6 (2008).</li><li>Spahn, C., Prescott, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Throwing+a+spanner+in+the+works:+antibiotics+and+the+translation+apparatus.">Throwing a spanner in the works: antibiotics and the translation apparatus.</a> Journal of molecular medicine. 74, 423-439 (1996).</li></ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

A novel high-throughput screening method to identify inhibitors against the RNA editing complex of Trypanosomes was presented, providing a new tool for drug discovery to counter diseases caused by trypanosomatids. FRET-based ribozyme assay has been extensively used for different purposes20-22; however, we have utilized the capacity of FRET-based ribozyme assay for in vitro monitoring of RNA editing activity19. This assay could potentially be adapted to other types of RNA editing in eukaryot...

The process of RNA editing, a post-transcriptional mRNA modification, was first discovered in trypanosomatids1. Since then, substantial work has been conducted in studying the mechanism behind RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei2,3. In a series of enzymatic reactions, the editosome, a core complex of about 20 proteins, creates mature mitochondrial mRNAs for multiple components of the energy generating oxidative phosphorylation system. The order of catalytic events is endonucleolytic cleavage, uridylate (U) addition or deletion, and ligation, as dictated by guide RNAs (gRNAs)4.
In addition to the core editosome complex proteins, a number of accessory factors have also been identified5-7. These proteins are mostly seen grouped in independent complexes. However, the order of protein assembly in the core editosome complex and the interaction patterns of the core complex with the accessory complexes are yet to be determined. Targeting the RNA editing process in trypanosomatids may provide chemical dissectors that aid in studying the assembly and function of the editosome complex. Furthermore, functional studies on several editosome proteins have shown essentiality across different life stages, indicating their potential as drug targets8-12. Therefore, the found inhibitors of the editosome may also act as lead compounds against trypanosomatids. This is timely, as drugs currently available against diseases caused by trypanosomatid are toxic, inefficient and expensive13,14.
An efficient and convenient in vitro assay is necessary to explore the chemical universe for specific inhibitors that block RNA editing. Three assays have been developed and used to monitor editosome activities: (a) full round in vitro RNA editing assay15, (b) pre-cleaved in vitro RNA editing assay16,17, and (c) hammerhead ribozyme (HHR)-based assay18. The first two assays rely on direct visualization of the edited product (ATPase 6 mRNA) with the help of radioactivity. The HHR-based assay uses a modified version of the ATPase 6 mRNA that is modeled to behave as a ribozyme upon editing. The functional ribozyme then specifically cleaves a radiolabeled RNA substrate, serving as a reporter. Recently, Moshiri et al. developed a &#8216;mix and measure&#8217; HHR-based in vitro reporter assay to monitor RNA editing where the radiolabeled RNA substrate is replaced with a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) substrate19. The principle advantages of this assay are: (a) it is a rapid and convenient mix and measure type of assay, as the production of active ribozyme and substrate cleavage occur simultaneously in the same tube in low volume (i.e. 20 &#956;l), (b) it avoids the use of radioactively labeled materials, (c) sensitivity that is afforded by fluorescence instrumentation in a micro-titer plate format, and (d) a high signal to noise ratio. Using this assay, the effect of known RNA editing ligase inhibitors against purified editosome was confirmed19. This experiment validated the assay for rapid identification of RNA editing inhibitors, primarily against whole editosomes from T. brucei.
Figure 1 is a detailed step-by-step schematic of the fluorescence-based in vitro RNA editing assay. This protocol can either be used for monitoring RNA editing in vitro or easily be adapted for screening compound libraries of various scales.

<table><tbody><tr><td>SDM-79 Medium</td><td>Gibco by Life Technologies</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fetal Bovine Serum</td><td>Life Technologies</td><td>12483-020</td><td>heat inactivation at 55 &amp;#176;C for 1 hr</td></tr><tr><td>Hemin, minimum 80%</td><td>Sigma</td><td>H5533-10G</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Penicillin-Streptomycin Sollution</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>MT-30-002-CI</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Dnase 1 recombinant, Rnase Free&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Roche</td><td>4716728001</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>T7 RiboMax Express Large&amp;nbsp; scale RNA&amp;nbsp; production system</td><td>Promega</td><td>P1320</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Kimble Kontes Dounce Tissue Grinders&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Fisher Scientific</td><td>K885300-0040&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gradient Master, ver 5.25&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Biocomp</td><td>107-201M</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ultra Clear Tube, 13.2 ml</td><td>Beckman Coulter</td><td>344059</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Optima L-100XP&amp;nbsp; Ultracentrifuge&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Beckman Coulter</td><td>392052</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>SW 41 Ti ROTOR</td><td>Beckman Coulter</td><td>331336</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>MicroSeal &#039;B&#039; Seal, Seals</td><td>Biorad</td><td>MSB1001</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CFX 384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System</td><td>Biorad</td><td>185-5484</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Acryl/Bis solution (19:1), 40% (w/v)</td><td>Bio Basic</td><td>A0006-500ML</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Urea, Molecular biology grade, 1 kg</td><td>Life Technologies</td><td>AM9902</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

rna catalyst as a reporter for screening drugs against rna editing in trypanosomes

Substantial progress has been made in determining the mechanism of mitochondrial RNA editing in trypanosomes. Similarly, considerable progress has been made in identifying the components of the editosome complex that catalyze RNA editing. However, it is still not clear how those proteins work together. Chemical compounds obtained from a high-throughput screen against the editosome may block or affect one or more steps in the editing cycle. Therefore, the identification of new chemical compounds will generate valuable molecular probes for dissecting the editosome function and assembly. In previous studies, in vitro editing assays were carried out using radio-labeled RNA. These assays are time consuming, inefficient and unsuitable for high-throughput purposes. Here, a homogenous fluorescence-based &#8220;mix and measure&#8221; hammerhead ribozyme in vitro reporter assay to monitor RNA editing, is presented. Only as a consequence of RNA editing of the hammerhead ribozyme a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) oligoribonucleotide substrate undergoes cleavage. This in turn results in separation of the fluorophore from the quencher thereby producing a signal. In contrast, when the editosome function is inhibited, the fluorescence signal will be quenched. This is a highly sensitive and simple assay that should be generally applicable to monitor in vitro RNA editing or high throughput screening of chemicals that can inhibit the editosome function.

To demonstrate the necessary steps required for setting up a large-scale screen, Figures 2-5 are representative control experiments related to the quality of the assay. These are essential control experiments for a consistent assay over several days of screening or for comparison of different screens.
Assessing the Fluorescence Signal-to-noise Ratio
To ensure the stability and quality of the &#64258;uorescein-labeled oligoribonucleo...

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about RNA Catalyst as a Reporter for Screening Drugs against RNA Editing in Trypanosomes at JoVE.com

RNA Catalyst as a Reporter for Screening Drugs against RNA Editing in Trypanosomes

A highly sensitive ribozyme-based assay, applicable to high-throughput screening of chemicals targeting the unique process of RNA editing in trypanosomatid pathogens, is described in this paper. Inhibitors can be used as tools for hypothesis-driven analysis of the RNA editing process and ultimately as therapeutics.

Substantial progress has been made in determining the mechanism of mitochondrial RNA editing in trypanosomes. Similarly, considerable progress has been ...

rna-catalyst-as-reporter-for-screening-drugs-against-rna-editing

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

8.4K Views.  McGill University. A highly sensitive ribozyme-based assay, applicable to high-throughput screening of chemicals targeting the unique process of RNA editing in trypanosomatid pathogens, is described in this paper. Inhibitors can be used as tools for hypothesis-driven analysis of the RNA editing process and ultimately as therapeutics.

Video: RNA Catalyst as a Reporter for Screening Drugs against RNA Editing in Trypanosomes

Enhanced Genome Editing with Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Diverse Cells and Organisms

Site-specific eukaryotic genome editing with CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas (CRISPR-associated) systems has quickly become a commonplace amongst researchers pursuing a wide variety of biological questions. Users most often employ the Cas9 protein derived from Streptococcus pyogenes in a complex with an easily reprogrammed guide RNA (gRNA). These components are introduced into cells, and through a base pairing with a complementary region of the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome, the enzyme cleaves both strands to generate a double-strand break (DSB). Subsequent repair leads to either random insertion or deletion events (indels) or the incorporation of experimenter-provided DNA at the site of the break.
The use of a purified single-guide RNA and Cas9 protein, preassembled to form an RNP and delivered directly to cells, is a potent approach for achieving highly efficient gene editing. RNP editing particularly enhances the rate of gene insertion, an outcome that is often challenging to achieve. Compared to the delivery via a plasmid, the shorter persistence of the Cas9 RNP within the cell leads to fewer off-target events. 
Despite its advantages, many casual users of CRISPR gene editing are less familiar with this technique. To lower the barrier to entry, we outline detailed protocols for implementing the RNP strategy in a range of contexts, highlighting its distinct benefits and diverse applications. We cover editing in two types of primary human cells, T cells and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). We also show how Cas9 RNP editing enables the facile genetic manipulation of entire organisms, including the classic model roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans and the more recently introduced model crustacean, Parhyale hawaiensis.

Utilizing a preassembled Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complex (RNP) is a powerful method for precise, efficient genome editing. Here, we highlight its utility across a broad range of cells and organisms, including primary human cells and both classic and emerging model organisms.

Site-specific eukaryotic genome editing with CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-Cas (CRISPR-associated) systems has ...

Genetics

Antibody-Free Assay for RNA Methyltransferase Activity Analysis

There are more than 100 chemically distinct modifications of RNA, two thirds of which consist of methylations. Interest in RNA modifications, and especially methylations, has re-emerged due to the important roles played by the enzymes that write and erase them in biological processes relevant to disease and cancer. Here, a sensitive in vitro assay for accurate analysis of RNA methylation writer activity on synthetic or in vitro transcribed RNAs is provided. This assay uses a tritiated form of S-adenosyl-methionine, resulting in direct labeling of methylated RNA with tritium. The low energy of tritium radiation makes the method safe, and pre-existing methods of tritium signal amplification, make it possible to quantify and to visualize the methylated RNA without the use of antibodies, which are commonly prone to artifacts. While this method is written for RNA methylation, few tweaks make it applicable to the study of other RNA modifications that can be radioactively labeled, such as RNA acetylation with 14C acetyl coenzyme A. Overall, this assay allows to quickly assess RNA methylation conditions, inhibition with small molecule inhibitors, or the effect of RNA or enzyme mutants, and provides a powerful tool to validate and expand results obtained in cells.

Here, an antibody-free in vitro assay for direct analysis of methyltransferase activity on synthetic or in vitro transcribed RNA is described.

There are more than 100 chemically distinct modifications of RNA, two thirds of which consist of methylations. Interest in RNA modifications, and ...

Optimizing the Genetic Incorporation of Chemical Probes into GPCRs for Photo-crosslinking Mapping and Bioorthogonal Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells

The genetic incorporation of non-canonical amino acids (ncAAs) via amber stop codon suppression is a powerful technique to install artificial probes and reactive moieties onto proteins directly in the live cell. Each ncAA is incorporated by a dedicated orthogonal suppressor-tRNA/amino-acyl-tRNA-synthetase (AARS) pair that is imported into the host organism. The incorporation efficiency of different ncAAs can greatly differ, and be unsatisfactory in some cases. Orthogonal pairs can be improved by manipulating either the AARS or the tRNA. However, directed evolution of tRNA or AARS using large libraries and dead/alive selection methods are not feasible in mammalian cells. Here, a facile and robust fluorescence-based assay to evaluate the efficiency of orthogonal pairs in mammalian cells is presented. The assay allows screening tens to hundreds of AARS/tRNA variants with a moderate effort and within a reasonable time. Use of this assay to generate new tRNAs that significantly improve the efficiency of the pyrrolysine orthogonal system is described, along with the application of ncAAs to the study of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), which are challenging objects for ncAA mutagenesis. First, by systematically incorporating a photo-crosslinking ncAA throughout the extracellular surface of a receptor, binding sites of different ligands on the intact receptor are mapped directly in the live cell. Second, by incorporating last-generation ncAAs into a GPCR, ultrafast catalyst-free receptor labeling with a fluorescent dye is demonstrated, which exploits bioorthogonal strain-promoted inverse Diels Alder cycloaddition (SPIEDAC) on the live cell. As ncAAs can be generally applied to any protein independently on its size, the method is of general interest for a number of applications. In addition, ncAA incorporation does not require any special equipment and is easily performed in standard biochemistry labs.

A facile fluorescence assay is presented to evaluate the efficiency of amino-acyl-tRNA-synthetase/tRNA pairs incorporating non-canonical amino-acids (ncAAs) into proteins expressed in mammalian cells. The application of ncAAs to study G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is described, including photo-crosslinking mapping of binding sites and bioorthogonal GPCR labeling on live cells.

The genetic incorporation of non-canonical amino acids (ncAAs) via amber stop codon suppression is a powerful technique to install artificial probes and ...

Chemistry

CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.

The bacterial Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR)/Streptococcus pyogenes CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) system has been harnessed by researchers to study important biologically relevant problems. The unparalleled power of the CRISPR/Cas genome editing method allows researchers to precisely edit any locus of their choosing, thereby facilitating an increased understanding of gene function. Several methods for editing the C. elegans genome by CRISPR/Cas9 have been described previously. Here, we discuss and demonstrate a method which utilizes in vitro assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes and the dpy-10 co-CRISPR marker for screening. Specifically, in this article, we go through the step-by-step process of introducing premature stop codons into the C. elegans rbm-3.2 gene by homology-directed repair using this method of CRISPR/Cas9 editing. This relatively simple editing method can be used to study the function of any gene of interest and allows for the generation of homozygous-edited C. elegans by CRISPR/Cas9 editing&#160;in less than two weeks.

CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.

The goal of this protocol is to enable seamless CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the C. elegans genome using assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes and the dpy-10 co-CRISPR marker for screening. This protocol can be used to make a variety of genetic modifications in C. elegans including insertions, deletions, gene replacements and codon substitutions.

The bacterial Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR)/Streptococcus pyogenes CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) system has been ...

Nonradioactive Assay to Measure Polynucleotide Phosphorylation of Small Nucleotide Substrates

Polynucleotide kinases (PNKs) are enzymes that catalyze the phosphorylation of the 5&#39; hydroxyl end of DNA and RNA oligonucleotides. The activity of PNKs can be quantified using direct or indirect approaches. Presented here is a direct, in vitro approach to measure PNK activity that relies on a fluorescently-labeled oligonucleotide substrate and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. This approach provides resolution of the phosphorylated products while avoiding the use of radiolabeled substrates. The protocol details how to set up the phosphorylation reaction, prepare and run large polyacrylamide gels, and quantify the reaction products. The most technically challenging part of this assay is pouring and running the large polyacrylamide gels; thus, important details to overcome common difficulties are provided. This protocol was optimized for Grc3, a PNK that assembles into an obligate pre-ribosomal RNA processing complex with its binding partner, the Las1 nuclease. However, this protocol can be adapted to measure the activity of other PNK enzymes. Moreover, this assay can also be modified to determine the effects of different components of the reaction, such as the nucleoside triphosphate, metal ions, and oligonucleotides.

This protocol describes a nonradioactive assay to measure kinase activity of polynucleotide kinases (PNKs) on small DNA and RNA substrates.

Polynucleotide kinases (PNKs) are enzymes that catalyze the phosphorylation of the 5&#39; hydroxyl end of DNA and RNA oligonucleotides. The activity of ...

Biochemistry

NMR-Based Activity Assays for Determining Compound Inhibition, IC50 Values, Artifactual Activity, and Whole-Cell Activity of Nucleoside Ribohydrolases

NMR spectroscopy is often used for the identification and characterization of enzyme inhibitors in drug discovery, particularly in the context of fragment screening. NMR-based activity assays are ideally suited to work at the higher concentrations of test compounds required to detect these weaker inhibitors. The dynamic range and chemical shift dispersion in an NMR experiment can easily resolve resonances from substrate, product, and test compounds. This contrasts with spectrophotometric assays, in which read-out interference problems often arise from compounds with overlapping UV-vis absorption profiles. In addition, since they lack reporter enzymes, the single-enzyme NMR assays are not prone to coupled-assay false positives. This attribute makes them useful as orthogonal assays, complementing traditional high throughput screening assays and benchtop triage assays. Detailed protocols are provided for initial compound assays at 500 &#956;M and 250 &#956;M, dose-response assays for determining IC50 values, detergent counter screen assays, jump-dilution counter screen assays, and assays in E. coli whole cells. The methods are demonstrated using two nucleoside ribohydrolase enzymes. The use of 1H NMR is shown for the purine-specific enzyme, while 19F NMR is shown for the pyrimidine-specific enzyme. The protocols are generally applicable to any enzyme where substrate and product resonances can be observed and distinguished by NMR spectroscopy. To be the most useful in the context of drug discovery, the final concentration of substrate should be no more than 2-3x its Km value. The choice of NMR experiment depends on the enzyme reaction and substrates available as well as available NMR instrumentation.

NMR-Based Activity Assays for Determining Compound Inhibition, IC50 Values, Artifactual Activity, and Whole-Cell Activity of Nucleoside Ribohydrolases

NMR-based activity assays have been developed to identify and characterize inhibitors of two nucleoside ribohydrolase enzymes. Protocols are provided for initial compound assays at 500 &#956;M and 250 &#956;M, dose-response assays for determining IC50 values, detergent counter screen assays, jump-dilution counter screen assays, and assays in E. coli whole cells.

NMR spectroscopy is often used for the identification and characterization of enzyme inhibitors in drug discovery, particularly in the context of fragment ...

Continuous Fluorescence-Based Endonuclease-Coupled DNA Methylation Assay to Screen for DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitors

DNA methylation, a form of epigenetic gene regulation, is important for normal cellular function. In cells, proteins called DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) establish and maintain the DNA methylation pattern. Changes to the normal DNA methylation pattern are linked to cancer development and progression, making DNMTs potential cancer drug targets. Thus, identifying and characterizing novel small molecule inhibitors of these enzymes is of great importance. This paper presents a protocol that can be used to screen for DNA methyltransferase inhibitors. The continuous coupled kinetics assay allows for initial velocities of DNA methylation to be determined in the presence and absence of potential small molecule inhibitors. The assay uses the methyl-sensitive endonuclease Gla I to couple methylation of a hemimethylated DNA substrate to fluorescence generation.
This continuous assay allows for enzyme activity to be monitored in real time. Conducting the assay in small volumes in microtiter plates reduces the cost of reagents. Using this assay, a small example screen was conducted for inhibitors of DNMT1, the most abundant DNMT isozyme in humans. The highly substituted anthraquinone natural product, laccaic acid A, is a potent, DNA-competitive inhibitor of DNMT1. Here, we examine three potential small molecule inhibitors &#8212; anthraquinones or anthraquinone-like molecules with one to three substituents &#8212; at two concentrations to describe the assay protocol. Initial velocities are used to calculate the percent activity observed in the presence of each molecule. One of three compounds examined exhibits concentration-dependent inhibition of DNMT1 activity, indicating that it is a potential inhibitor of DNMT1.

DNA methyltransferases are potential cancer drug targets. Here, a protocol is presented to assess small molecules for DNA methyltransferase inhibition. This assay utilizes an endonuclease to couple DNA methylation to fluorescence generation and allows for enzyme activity to be monitored in real time.&#160;

DNA methylation, a form of epigenetic gene regulation, is important for normal cellular function. In cells, proteins called DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) ...

Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems

The translation of genes into proteins is prone to errors. Although the average rate of translational error in model systems is estimated to be 1/10,000 per codon, the actual error rates vary widely, depending on the species, environment, and codons being studied. We have previously shown that mycobacteria use a two-step pathway for the generation of aminoacylated glutamine and asparagine tRNAs and that this is specifically associated with relatively high error rates due to the modulation of mistranslation rates by an essential component of the pathway, the amidotransferase GatCAB. We modified a previously employed Renilla-Firefly dual-luciferase system that had been used to measure mistranslation rates in Escherichia coli for use in mycobacteria to measure specific mistranslation rates of glutamate at glutamine codons and aspartate for asparagine codons. Although this reporter system was suitable for the accurate estimation of specific error rates, lack of sensitivity and requirements for excessive manipulation steps made it unsuitable for high-throughput applications. Therefore, we developed a second gain-of-function reporter system, using Nluc luciferase and green fluorescent protein (GFP), which is more amenable to medium/high-throughput settings. We used this system to identify kasugamycin as a small molecule that can decrease mycobacterial mistranslation. Although the reporters that we describe here have been used to measure specific types of mycobacterial mistranslation, they may be modified to measure other types of mistranslation in a number of model systems.

In this article, we present two complementary methods to measure specific rates of translational error and mistranslation in the model mycobacterium, Mycobacterium smegmatis, using gain-of-function reporter systems. The methods can be employed to measure accurate error rates in low throughput or relative error rates in a more high-throughput setting.

The translation of genes into proteins is prone to errors. Although the average rate of translational error in model systems is estimated to be 1/10,000 ...

Immunology and Infection

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

RNA editing is a process that leads to posttranscriptional sequence alterations in RNAs. Detection and quantification of RNA editing rely mainly on Sanger sequencing and RNA sequencing techniques. However, these methods can be costly and time-consuming. In this protocol, a portable microtemperature gradient gel electrophoresis (&#181;TGGE) system is used as a nonsequencing approach for the rapid detection of RNA editing. The process is based on the principle of electrophoresis, which uses high temperatures to denature nucleic acid samples as they move across a polyacrylamide gel. Across a range of temperatures, a DNA fragment forms a gradient of fully double-stranded DNA to partially separated strands and then to entirely separated single-stranded DNA. RNA-edited sites with distinct nucleotide bases produce different melting profiles in &#181;TGGE analyses. We used the &#181;TGGE-based approach to characterize the differences between the melting profiles of four edited RNA fragments and their corresponding nonedited (wild-type) fragments. Pattern Similarity Scores (PaSSs) were calculated by comparing the band patterns produced by the edited and nonedited RNAs and were used to assess the reproducibility of the method. Overall, the platform described here enables the detection of even single base mutations in RNAs in a straightforward, simple, and cost-effective manner. It is anticipated that this analysis tool will aid new molecular biology findings.

Rapid detection and reliable quantification of RNA editing events at a genomic scale remain challenging and currently rely on direct RNA sequencing methods. The protocol described here uses microtemperature gradient gel electrophoresis (&#181;TGGE) as a simple, quick, and portable method of detecting RNA editing.

RNA editing is a process that leads to posttranscriptional sequence alterations in RNAs. Detection and quantification of RNA editing rely mainly on Sanger ...

Bioengineering

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes

Both transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation have a profound impact on genes expression. However, commonly adopted cell-based screening assays focus on transcriptional regulation, being essentially aimed at the identification of promoter-targeting molecules. As a result, post-transcriptional mechanisms are largely uncovered by gene expression targeted drug development. Here we describe a cell-based assay aimed at investigating the role of the 3&#39; untranslated region (3&#8217; UTR) in the modulation of the fate of its mRNA, and at identifying compounds able to modify it. The assay is based on the use of a luciferase reporter construct containing the 3&#8217; UTR of a gene of interest stably integrated into a disease-relevant cell line. The protocol is divided into two parts, with the initial focus on the primary screening aimed at the identification of molecules affecting luciferase activity after 24 hr of treatment. The second part of the protocol describes the counter-screening necessary to discriminate compounds modulating luciferase activity specifically through the 3&#8217; UTR. In addition to the detailed protocol and representative results, we provide important considerations about the assay development and the validation of the hit(s) on the endogenous target. The described cell-based reporter gene assay will allow scientists to identify molecules modulating protein levels via post-transcriptional mechanisms dependent on a 3&#8217; UTR.

Here we describe a cell-based reporter gene assay as a valuable tool to screen chemical libraries for compounds modulating post-transcriptional control mechanisms exerted through 3&#8217; UTR.

Both transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation have a profound impact on genes expression. However, commonly adopted cell-based screening assays ...

RNA Catalyst as a Reporter for Screening Drugs against RNA Editing in Trypanosomes

Summary

Explore More Videos

Chapters in this video

Enhanced Genome Editing with Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Diverse Cells and Organisms

Antibody-Free Assay for RNA Methyltransferase Activity Analysis

Optimizing the Genetic Incorporation of Chemical Probes into GPCRs for Photo-crosslinking Mapping and Bioorthogonal Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells

CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.

Nonradioactive Assay to Measure Polynucleotide Phosphorylation of Small Nucleotide Substrates

NMR-Based Activity Assays for Determining Compound Inhibition, IC₅₀ Values, Artifactual Activity, and Whole-Cell Activity of Nucleoside Ribohydrolases

Continuous Fluorescence-Based Endonuclease-Coupled DNA Methylation Assay to Screen for DNA Methyltransferase Inhibitors

Measurement of Specific Mycobacterial Mistranslation Rates with Gain-of-function Reporter Systems

A Nonsequencing Approach for the Rapid Detection of RNA Editing

High-throughput Screening for Chemical Modulators of Post-transcriptionally Regulated Genes