A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Transthoracic ultrasound-guided lung biopsy represents a safe, cost-effective, and efficient approach for patients presenting with subpleural lung lesions suspected of malignancy. Employing a systematic, step-by-step process is crucial to achieve optimal patient selection, minimize complication risks, and maximize diagnostic accuracy.
Diagnosing patients with radiological lung lesions, especially those suspected of having primary lung cancer, is a common and critical clinical scenario. When selecting the most suitable invasive procedure to establish a diagnosis in these cases, a delicate balance must be struck between achieving a high diagnostic yield, providing staging information, minimizing potential complications, enhancing the patient experience, and controlling costs. The integration of thoracic ultrasound as a routine clinical tool in respiratory medicine has led to increased awareness and utilization of ultrasound-guided invasive techniques in chest procedures, including transthoracic biopsies. By following a systematic and stepwise approach, transthoracic ultrasound-guided lung biopsy emerges as a safe, cost-effective procedure with a remarkable diagnostic accuracy. These attributes collectively position it as an ideal invasive technique when technically feasible. Consequently, in patients presenting subpleural lung lesions suspected of malignancy, transthoracic ultrasound-guided lung biopsy has become a standard procedure in the realm of modern invasive pulmonology.
Establishing a diagnosis in patients with radiological lung lesions is crucial, particularly when malignancy is suspected. Tissue sampling is essential for confirming malignancy, obtaining additional information like genotyping and staging, and diagnosing non-malignant lung lesions (e.g., infection or vasculitis)1,2.
Several invasive procedures are available for tissue sampling in patients with lung lesions, including conventional bronchoscopy, bronchoscopy supplemented with radial endobronchial ultrasound (REBUS), electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), computed tomography guided transthoracic biopsy (CT-TTNB), and surgical biopsy3,4,5,6. The selection of the optimal procedure involves balancing factors like diagnostic yield, complication risks, patient comfort, and resource allocation3.
Most of these techniques have limitations. For instance, conventional bronchoscopy is less effective for peripheral lesions, CT-TTB carries a higher risk of complications (especially pneumothorax), and procedures like ENB and surgical biopsy can be costly4,6,7.
Ultrasound-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (US-TTNB) is an alternative method for obtaining tissue samples from lung lesions. The technique itself is not new, but its use has significantly increased in patients with peripheral lung lesions of unknown origin, particularly among pulmonologists, who now routinely use thoracic ultrasound (TUS) for point-of-care diagnostics and basic procedural guidance in various clinical scenarios8,9. In addition, ultrasound equipment is now more widely available, with TUS training increasingly formalized and made more accessible to clinicians at an earlier stage9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16.
US-TTNB carries several potential advantages. Complication rates and costs related to the procedure are low, while diagnostic yields remain comparable to other approaches, especially CT-TTB17,18,19,18,19,20,21. Its major limitation, however, is its suitability only for a limited proportion of lung lesions that can be appropriately visualized using TUS. Therefore, it cannot be used for lesions that do not contact the parietal pleura at the chest wall, such as any central tumor; lesions behind structures impenetrable to ultrasound waves, such as the scapula; or lesions with a meaningful air content, which also does not transmit ultrasound, such as 'ground glass' opacities seen on CT8,9,17,18,19,20,22,21,22,23,24,25,26. US-TTNB is also unable to definitively assess the N-stage of lung cancer, meaning in some cases, the procedure must be combined with another invasive procedure to provide a full picture1,2.
Nonetheless, US-TTNB remains an important and increasingly used front-line tool in modern invasive pulmonology practice in selected patients with suspected malignant lung lesions9,18.
Indications and contraindications
US-TTNB is indicated when all of the following criteria are met: (1) subpleural lung consolidation that can be visualized using thoracic ultrasound; (2) clinically warranted lung tissue biopsy (e.g., for establishing a diagnosis, obtaining material for supplementary diagnostic analyses). US-TTNB should not be performed when one or more of the following criteria are met: (1) manifest chronic or acute respiratory failure; (2) hemorrhagic diatheses; (3) ongoing treatment with anticoagulants or platelet aggregation inhibitors; (4) another invasive method for tissue sampling can establish a diagnosis and simultaneously provide N- or M-staging (e.g., EBUS/EUS-B in patients with suspected lung cancer and suspected involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes).
It should be noted, however, that the listed contraindications are generally relative. The physician, in agreement with the patient, should consider the clinical consequences of obtaining a biopsy by US-TTNB and balance this against the risk of complications and other potential invasive or diagnostic methods that could be performed instead of US-TTNB.
The described protocol below follows the human care guidelines of Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, and the University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. The step-wise protocol described below represents a potential, systematic approach for a typical patient with suspected lung cancer for whom US-TTNB was performed in an outpatient or daycase setting. Informed written consent was obtained from the patient. We have taken into account current clinical practices at the authors' institutions, as well as descriptions from previously published papers9,13,17,26, and have sought to achieve a balance between likely diagnostic success, costs, and patient experience, as described in the introduction. However, the approach can and should be modified in line with local differences in available equipment, clinical settings, patient preferences, and specific requirements for the obtained biopsy material, including if a non-malignant lesion is suspected. Any US-TTB should also be performed in accordance with existing local, national, and international guidelines and standards, where applicable. The protocol depends on there being one physician who is trained and competent in performing US-TTNB and one assistant, such as a procedural nurse. Both should have sufficient experience with the procedure and should be confident in the management of possible acute complications.
1. Preprocedural assessment of available clinical information and imaging
2. Preprocedural equipment control
3. Checking and consenting the patient
4. Patient positioning
5. Preprocedural thoracic ultrasound
6. Patient monitoring and safety
7. Biopsy equipment preparation
8. Injection of local anesthetics
9. Biopsy procedure
10. Postprocedural thoracic ultrasound
11. Postprocedural patient observation and information
The overall diagnostic yield of US-TTNB in patients with lung lesions has been reported as 88.7% in a meta-analysis by DiBardiono et al.18. However, it should be noted that other studies have reported lower diagnostic yields of US-TTNB17,23,25. Several patient factors have been shown to affect the diagnostic yield of US-TTNB, including: (1) whether there is a malignant or non-malignant condition; (2) the ...
Appropriate patient selection and a careful initial TUS assessment are crucial steps before performing US-TTNB. If the lung lesion cannot be visualized, US-TTNB is not a viable option. Ideally, TUS should be conducted before scheduling the procedure during the clinic visit to prevent last-minute cancellations in the procedural room17. This approach also allows for more comprehensive planning and a potential shift to an alternative invasive procedure if the lesion cannot be visualized
The authors have nothing to disclose.
None.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Ambu BlueSensor R | Ambu | R-00-S/25 | ECG patches |
BD NexivaΒ Closed IV Catheter System (20 GA x 1.25 in)(1.1 x 32 mm) | BD | 383667 | Intravenous accesskit |
BD PosiFlush SP Syringe 5 mL | BD | 306574 | Syringe with 5 mL 0.9% NaCl |
Blunt Fill Needle with 5 Micron Filter (18 G x 11/2") | Sol-Millennium Medical Inc. | BN1815F | 18 G needle |
C1-6VN ultrasound transducer | GE Healthcare | 5476279 | Ultrasound transducer |
C2-9D ultrasound transducer | GE Healthcare | 5405253 | Ultrasound transducer |
CARBON STEEL SURGICAL BLADES | Swann-Morton | 203 | Scalpel blade |
Disinfection wipe (82% ehanol + 0.5% chlorhexidine) | Vitrex Medical A/S | 527297 | Disinfection wipeΒ |
Disposable needle single use (0.80 mm x 80 mm) | Misawa Medical Industry Co., Ltd. | K070001 | 80 mm 21 G hypodermic needle |
EKO GEL | Ekkomed A/S | 29060008-29 | Ultrasound gel |
Formalin system, buffered formalin solution 450 mL | Sarstedt | 5,11,703 | Biopsy specimen contained and relevant fixation liquid (e.g. formaldehyde) |
GAMMEX Latex | Ansell | 330048075 | Sterile gloves |
KD-JECT 20 mL | KD Medcial GmbH | 820209 | 20 mL syringe |
Klorhexidin sprit 0.5% 500 mL | Fuckborg Pharma | 212045 | Disinfectant |
Lidokain Mylan 10 mg/mL, 20 mL | Mylan | NO-6042A1 | Local anesthetic (20 mL, 2% lidocaine) |
LOGIQ E10 | GE Healthcare | NA | High-end ultrasound machine |
MΓΆlnlycke BARRIER Adhesive Aperture Drape (50 x 60 cm / 6 x 8 cm)Β | MΓΆlnlycke Healthcare AB | 906693 | Adhesive surgical drape with a central hole |
MΓΆlnlycke Gauze 10 x 10 cm | MΓΆlnlycke Healthcare AB | 158440 | Swaps for applying disinfectant |
Philips IntelliVue X2 | Philips | NA | Patient monitoring system |
Raucodrape PRO 75 x 90 cm | Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co | 33 005 | Sterile drape for procedure table |
SEMICUT 18 G x 100 mm | MDL | PD01810 | 18 G x 100 mm core biopsy needle |
SEMICUT 18 G x 160 mm | MDL | PD01816 | 18 G x 160 mm core biopsy needle |
S-Monovette, 25 mL, for Formalin system, (LxΓ): 97 x 25 mm, with paper label | Sarstedt | 9,17,05,001 | Biopsy specimen container |
Sterican (0.80 x 120 mm BL/LB) | Braun | 4665643 | 120 mm 21 G hypodermic needle |
Tegaderm I.V. | 3M | 1633 | I.V. Transparent film dressing with border |
Ultra-Pro IIΒ Disposable Replacement Kits | CIVCO | 610-608 | For use with GE Healthcare C2-9 transducer |
Ultra-Pro IIΒ In-Plane Ultrasound Needle Guides-Multi-Angle | CIVCO | H4913BA | For use with GE Healthcare C2-9 transducer |
VerzaΒ Needle Guidance System for VerzaLinkβ’Β Transducers | CIVCO | 610-1500-24 | For use with GE Healthcare C1-6 transducer |
VerzaΒ Ultrasound Needle Guidance System | CIVCO | H4917VB | For use with GE Healthcare C1-6 transducer |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright Β© 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved