JoVE 비디오를 활용하시려면 도서관을 통한 기관 구독이 필요합니다. 전체 비디오를 보시려면 로그인하거나 무료 트라이얼을 시작하세요.
Here, we present a protocol to allow providers to perform focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) in the clinical environment. We describe methods of transducer manipulation, review common pitfalls of transducer movements, and suggest tips to optimize phased array transducer use.
Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is a limited, clinician-performed application of echocardiography to add real-time information to patient care. These bedside exams are problem oriented, rapidly and repeatedly performed, and largely qualitative in nature. Competency in FoCUS includes mastery of the stereotactic and psychomotor skills required for transducer manipulation and image acquisition. Competency also requires the ability to optimize the setup, troubleshoot image acquisition, and understand the sonographic limitations because of complex clinical environments and patient pathology. This article presents concepts for successful, high-quality two-dimensional (B-mode) image acquisition in FoCUS.
Concepts of high-quality image acquisition can be applied to all established sonographic windows of the FoCUS exam: the parasternal long-axis (PLAX), parasternal short-axis (PSAX), apical four chamber (A4C), subcostal fourchamber (SC4C), and the inferior vena cava (IVC). The apical five-chamber (A5C) and subcostal short-axis (SCSA) views are mentioned, but are not discussed in-depth. A pragmatic figure illustrating the movements of the phased array transducer is also provided to serve as a cognitive aid during FoCUS image acquisition.
Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is a limited, clinician-performed application of echocardiography that provides immediate anatomic, physiologic, and functional information to patient care. These exams, consisting of five classic views, are problem oriented, performed in real time at the bedside, and do not replace comprehensive echocardiography exams1,2. Given the focused nature of these exams, they are often repeatedly performed when clinical status changes or serial monitoring is required. It is important to have standardized training and obtain adequate images of all five views, when possible, as some views may provide limited information depending on the individual patient and pathology.
The use of FoCUS is rapidly expanding. Many clinical landscapes, such as perioperative anesthesiology, critical care and emergency medicine1,2,3, now routinely employ FoCUS. Inpatient medical wards and outpatient clinical care settings are also adopting this tool to enhance clinical practice4,5,6. As a result, several societal bodies, such as the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Critical Care Medicine, and the American College of Emergency Physicians, have published guidelines and recommendations for FoCUS competency and scope of practice7,8,9. While these guidelines and recommendations are not codified, much of the content is consistent and influences FoCUS training curricula10.
Beyond didactics and image interpretation, competency in FoCUS includes mastery of stereotactic and psychomotor skill sets. Stereotactic skill refers to the accurate positioning of ultrasound transducers on the body, based on three-dimensional anatomic features. Psychomotor skill describes the relationship between cognitive function and physical movement that influences coordination, dexterity, and manipulation. Expanding knowledge and awareness about these skills supports FoCUS trainee development.
This article presents concepts for high-quality image acquisition in FoCUS, with both pragmatic considerations and attention to stereotactic and psychomotor skill sets. Specifically, it discusses optimal patient positioning, transducer manipulation, and suggests tips to optimize phased array transducer use. Finally, it examines image optimization for 2-dimensional (B-mode or 2-D mode) and motion modes (M-mode).
This material is the authors' original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere. The protocol described is for clinical use and not research purposes. De-identified images were obtained from a volunteer model in a non-clinical environment. The authors did not seek a formal "Not Regulated" determination from the IRB in accordance with institutional policy, as the activity falls outside of the Common Rule and FDA definitions of human subject research.
1. The transducer
2. Patient positioning
3. Transducer manipulation
4. 2-D image optimization
5. Motion mode (M-mode)
6. Parasternal long axis (PLAX)
NOTE: The PLAX refers to obtaining an image that is along the long axis of the heart (Figure 2).
7. Parasternal short axis (PSAX; Figure 3)
8. Apical four chamber view (A4C; Figure 4)
NOTE: Images in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and otherwise inflamed thoracic cavities, are obtained more medially, and images in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have their view more lateral.
9. Subcostal four chamber view (SC4C; Figure 5)
10. Inferior vena cava (IVC; Figure 6)
Representative images obtained from the focused cardiac ultrasound protocol presented above are presented in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, and Figure 6, demonstrating the feasibility of the technique described. These images were captured with the phased array 5-1 MHz transducer. The parasternal long axis (PLAX) image obtained from protocol se...
The aim of this publication is to provide practical recommendations and best practices to achieve optimal FoCUS images in challenging clinical environments. Formal ultrasound seminars, clinical experience, and observations of learners during hands-on teaching have given insight into pitfalls and less optimal tendencies. As a result, many factors that influence the stereotactic and psychomotor skills have become apparent. Although this material is described in relation to FoCUS exams, many of the principles can be applied...
The authors whose names are listed immediately below certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers' bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
We would like to thank the University of Michigan Department of Anesthesia, Max Harry Weil Institute for Critical Care Research and Innovation, and Katelyn Murphy for their administrative and graphic design support.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Aquasonic ultrasound gel | Parker | 30592052 | https://dr.graphiccontrols.com/en/catalog/ultrasound-gel/parker-laboratories-01-50-aquasonic-100-gel-5l-1332e66e/ |
Philips Sparq ultrasound machine | Phillips | https://www.usa.philips.com/healthcare/product/HC795090CC/sparq-ultrasound-system#documents |
JoVE'article의 텍스트 или 그림을 다시 사용하시려면 허가 살펴보기
허가 살펴보기This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. 판권 소유