This work was supported in part by funding from a DARPA Safe Genes Program Grant (HR0011-17-2-0047), and NIH awards (R21RAI149161A, DP2AI152071) awarded to O.S.A.

<ol>
	<li>Adli, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+CRISPR+tool+kit+for+genome+editing+and+beyond.">The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond.</a> Nat Communications. 9, 1911 (2018).</li><li>Abudayyeh, O., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=C2c2+is+a+single-component+programmable+RNA-guided+RNA-targeting+CRISPR+effector.">C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector.</a> Science. 353 (6299), 5573 (2016).</li><li>East-Seletsky, A., O'Connell, M., Burstein, D., Knott, G., Doudna, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=RNA+Targeting+by+Functionally+Orthogonal+Type+VI-A+CRISPR-Cas+Enzymes.">RNA Targeting by Functionally Orthogonal Type VI-A CRISPR-Cas Enzymes.</a> Molecular Cell. 66 (3), 373-383 (2017).</li><li>Konermann, S., Lotfy, P., Brideau, N., Oki, J., Shokhirev, M., Hsu, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Transcriptome+Engineering+with+RNA-Targeting+Type+VI-D+CRISPR+Effectors.">Transcriptome Engineering with RNA-Targeting Type VI-D CRISPR Effectors.</a> Cell. 173 (3), 665-676 (2018).</li><li>Buchman, A., Brogan, D., Sun, R., Yang, T., Hsu, P., Akbari, O. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Programmable+RNA+Targeting+Using+CasRx+in+Flies.">Programmable RNA Targeting Using CasRx in Flies.</a> The CRISPR Journal. 3 (3), 164-176 (2020).</li><li>Kushawah, G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=CRISPR-Cas13d+Induces+Efficient+mRNA+Knockdown+in+Animal+Embryos.">CRISPR-Cas13d Induces Efficient mRNA Knockdown in Animal Embryos.</a> Developmental Cell. 54 (6), 805-817 (2020).</li><li>Abudayyeh, O., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=RNA+targeting+with+CRISPR-Cas13.">RNA targeting with CRISPR-Cas13.</a> Nature. 550, 280-284 (2017).</li><li>Perrimon, N., Ni, J., Perkins, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=In+vivo+RNAi:+today+and+tomorrow.">In vivo RNAi: today and tomorrow.</a> Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2, 003640 (2010).</li><li>Dietzl, G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+genome-wide+transgenic+RNAi+library+for+conditional+gene+inactivation+in+Drosophila.">A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila.</a> Nature. 448, 151-156 (2007).</li><li>Ni, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+Drosophila+resource+of+transgenic+RNAi+lines+for+neurogenetics.">A Drosophila resource of transgenic RNAi lines for neurogenetics.</a> Genetics. 182 (4), 1089-1100 (2009).</li><li>Ni, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+genome-scale+shRNA+resource+for+transgenic+RNAi+in+Drosophila.">A genome-scale shRNA resource for transgenic RNAi in Drosophila.</a> Nature Methods. 8, 405-407 (2011).</li><li>Ni, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Vector+and+parameters+for+targeted+transgenic+RNA+interference+in+Drosophila+melanogaster.">Vector and parameters for targeted transgenic RNA interference in Drosophila melanogaster.</a> Nature Methods. 5, 49-51 (2008).</li><li>Heigwer, F., Port, F., Boutros, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=RNA+Interference+(RNAi)+Screening+in+Drosophila.">RNA Interference (RNAi) Screening in Drosophila.</a> Genetics. 208 (3), 853-874 (2018).</li><li>Kulkarni, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Evidence+of+off-target+effects+associated+with+long+dsRNAs+in+Drosophila+melanogaster+cell-based+assays.">Evidence of off-target effects associated with long dsRNAs in Drosophila melanogaster cell-based assays.</a> Nature Methods. 3, 833-838 (2006).</li><li>Ma, Y., Creanga, A., Lum, L., Beachy, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Prevalence+of+off-target+effects+in+Drosophila+RNA+interference+screens.">Prevalence of off-target effects in Drosophila RNA interference screens.</a> Nature. 443, 359-363 (2006).</li><li>Perrimon, N., Mathey-Prevot, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Matter+arising:+off-targets+and+genome-scale+RNAi+screens+in+Drosophila.">Matter arising: off-targets and genome-scale RNAi screens in Drosophila.</a> Fly. 1 (1), 1-5 (2007).</li><li>Markstein, M., Pitsouli, C., Villalta, C., Celniker, S., Perrimon, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Exploiting+position+effects+and+the+gypsy+retrovirus+insulator+to+engineer+precisely+expressed+transgenes.">Exploiting position effects and the gypsy retrovirus insulator to engineer precisely expressed transgenes.</a> Nature Genetics. 40, 476-483 (2008).</li><li>Champer, J., Buchman, A., Akbari, O. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Cheating+evolution:+engineering+gene+drives+to+manipulate+the+fate+of+wild+populations.">Cheating evolution: engineering gene drives to manipulate the fate of wild populations.</a> Nature Review Genetics. 17 (3), 146-159 (2016).</li><li>Buchman, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Broad+dengue+neutralization+in+mosquitoes+expressing+an+engineered+antibody.">Broad dengue neutralization in mosquitoes expressing an engineered antibody.</a> PLoS Pathogens. 16 (4), 1008103 (2020).</li><li>Mathur, G., Sanchez-Vargas, I., Alvarez, D., Olson, K., Marinotti, O., James, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Transgene-mediated+suppression+of+dengue+viruses+in+the+salivary+glands+of+the+yellow+fever+mosquito,+Aedes+aegypti.">Transgene-mediated suppression of dengue viruses in the salivary glands of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti.</a> Insect Molecular Biology. 19 (6), 753-763 (2011).</li><li>Franz, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Engineering+RNA+interference-based+resistance+to+dengue+virus+type+2+in+genetically+modified+Aedes+aegypti.">Engineering RNA interference-based resistance to dengue virus type 2 in genetically modified Aedes aegypti.</a> Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 103 (11), 4198-4203 (2006).</li><li>Yen, P., James, A., Li, J., Chen, C., Failloux, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Synthetic+miRNAs+induce+dual+arboviral-resistance+phenotypes+in+the+vector+mosquito+Aedes+aegypti.">Synthetic miRNAs induce dual arboviral-resistance phenotypes in the vector mosquito Aedes aegypti.</a> Communications Biology. 1, 11 (2018).</li><li>Buchman, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Engineered+resistance+to+Zika+virus+in+transgenic+Aedes+aegypti+expressing+a+polycistronic+cluster+of+synthetic+small+RNAs.">Engineered resistance to Zika virus in transgenic Aedes aegypti expressing a polycistronic cluster of synthetic small RNAs.</a> Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 116 (9), 3656-3661 (2019).</li><li>. Addgene Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.addgene.org/protocols/restriction-digest/">https://www.addgene.org/protocols/restriction-digest/</a> (2020)</li><li>Gibson, D., Young, L., Chuang, R., Venter, J., Hutchison, C., Smith, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Enzymatic+assembly+of+DNA+molecules+up+to+several+hundred+kilobases.">Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases.</a> Nature Methods. 6 (5), 343-345 (2009).</li><li>. Addgene Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://www.addgene.org/protocols/pcr/">https://www.addgene.org/protocols/pcr/</a> (2020)</li><li>. Indiana University Bloomington Available from: <a target="_blank" href="https://bdsc.indiana.edu/information/recipes/bloomfood.htmL">https://bdsc.indiana.edu/information/recipes/bloomfood.htmL</a> (2020)</li><li>Dobin, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=STAR:ultrafast+universal+RNA-seq+aligner.">STAR:ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner.</a> Bioinformatics. 29 (1), 15-21 (2013).</li><li>Jiang, W., Brueggeman, A., Horken, K., Plucinak, T., Weeks, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Successful+transient+expression+of+Cas9+and+single+guide+RNA+genes+in+Chlamydomonas+reinhardtii.">Successful transient expression of Cas9 and single guide RNA genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.</a> Eukaryotic Cell. 13 (11), 1465-1469 (2014).</li><li>Poe, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Robust+CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated+Tissue-Specific+mutagenesis+reveals+gene+redundancy+and+perdurance+in+Drosophila.">Robust CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Tissue-Specific mutagenesis reveals gene redundancy and perdurance in Drosophila.</a> Genetics. 211 (2), 459-472 (2019).</li><li>Port, F., Chen, H., Lee, T., Bullock, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Optimized+CRISPR/Cas+tools+for+efficient+ger+mLine+and+somatic+genome+engineering+in+Drosophila.">Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient ger mLine and somatic genome engineering in Drosophila.</a> Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 111 (29), 2967-2976 (2014).</li><li>Yang, S., Li, S., Li, X. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Shortening+the+Half-Life+of+Cas9+maintains+its+gene+editing+ability+and+reduces+neuronal+toxicity.">Shortening the Half-Life of Cas9 maintains its gene editing ability and reduces neuronal toxicity.</a> Cell Reports. 25 (10), 2653-2659 (2018).</li><li>Port, F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+large-scale+resource+for+tissue-specific+CRISPR+mutagenesis+in+Drosophila.">A large-scale resource for tissue-specific CRISPR mutagenesis in Drosophila.</a> eLife. 9, 53865 (2020).</li><li>Zhang, X., Tee, L., Wang, X., Huang, Q., Yang, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Off-target+Effects+in+CRISPR/Cas9-mediated+Genome+Engineering.">Off-target Effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Genome Engineering.</a> Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids. 4 (17), 264 (2015).</li><li>Huynh, N., Depner, N., Larson, R., King-Jones, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=A+versatile+toolkit+for+CRISPR-Cas13-based+RNA+manipulation+in+Drosophila.">A versatile toolkit for CRISPR-Cas13-based RNA manipulation in Drosophila.</a> Genome Biology. 21, 279 (2020).</li></ol>

O.S.A is a founder of Agragene, Inc., has an equity interest, and serves on the company's Scientific Advisory Board. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of California, San Diego in accordance with its conflict-of-interest policies. All other authors declare no competing interests.

With three different application designs of the CasRx system, this work demonstrated&#160;in vivoprogrammable RNA targeting in flies. The different strategies cater to different project needs, such as endogenous versus exogenous gene targeting and ubiquitous versus tissue-specific RNA targeting. The effects of RNA targeting included target gene specific phenotypic changes, target RNA transcript reduction, and occasional lethality phenotypes associated with high expression of CasRx protein and collateral activity. Overall, these results showed that the CasRx system is capable of target RNA transcript reduction at the organismal level in a programmable and efficient manner.
One of the key factors in successful customizing of the CasRx system is the design of gRNAs. Specifically, the following advice shall be heeded: the target sequence is around 30 nucleotides in length, the length of poly-U stretches in the target sequence is 4 base pairs or less, the target sequence GC content is in the range of 30% - 70%, the target sequence is not predicted to form strong RNA hairpin structures, and the target sequence contains minimal predicted RNA secondary or tertiary structure5.
In addition to the gRNA designs, the fly genetics step in each protocol is also critical in a successful implementation. The presence or lack of the defined phenotypes passed down from the parents in the progenies are important for identifying and quantifying phenotypes induced by the CasRx system in the transheterozygous progenies. Also, setting up control crosses using the dCasRx flies in parallel are also helpful in the ruling out non-specific phenotypes in the transheterozygous progenies.
It is worth noting that these results revealed toxicity issue introduced by ubiquitously expressing CasRx and dCasRx protein in the fly, a limitation of CasRx system. Ubiquitous expression of CasRx or dCasRx under the Ubiq promotor alone, without gRNAs, came with nontrivial fitness costs, as neither Ubiq-CasRx nor Ubiq-dCasRx flies could be established as homozygous lines. On the contrary, UASt-CasRx and UASt-dCasRx flies can be established as healthy homozygous stocks, though due to the design of the cross scheme they were kept as double-balanced stocks, a fact that supports the existence of toxicity induced by ubiquitous CasRx protein expression. Another piece of supporting evidence is that in control experiments involving dCasRx, which is catalytically inactive, the percentages of flies carrying both dCasRx and gRNA constructs out of the total number of flies in the F1 generation were consistently lower than 50%, the ratio expected based on Mendelian genetics if no dCasRx-associated toxicity was present. This indicated that ubiquitously expressing dCasRx, along with gRNAs, induces toxicity in the fly, resulting less than expected inheritance ratio. The inheritance ratios of transheterozygous UASt-dCasRx, gRNA, GAL4 flies followed Mendelian genetics, which again suggests the toxicity induced specifically by ubiquitous expression of CasRx and dCasRx proteins. Toxicity in CRISPR/Cas system is not new. High amounts of Cas9 protein has been shown to be toxic in several organisms, including flies29,30,31,32. A recent study has developed a customized GAL4/UAS system that can tune the amount of Cas9 protein expressed in flies by adding an open-reading frame of varying length between the UAS sequence and the Cas9 sequence in the UAS-Cas9 construct33. Therefore, it is worth exploring ways to reduce CasRx-induced toxicity by tuning the CasRx protein expression level.
Other than the toxicity induced by ubiquitous expression of CasRx and dCasRx proteins, the results also showed lethality linked to CasRx system&#39;s non-specific collateral off-target effects, a feature of many CRISPR systems1, 2, 7, 34. In some of the CasRx and non-essential gene gRNA-expressing double or triple transheterozygous flies, for example when targeting Notch, the transheterozygous CasRx flies have significantly lower levels of survival rate compared to the transheterozgyous dCasRx flies. In the RNA-seq analysis of these CasRx and gRNA-expressing transheterozygous flies, both the reduction of target gene transcript levels and the reduction of non-target gene transcripts were observed. These collateral effects were CasRx-dependent and target-dependent, as they were only observed in transheterozygous flies expressing both the CasRx protein and the gRNA. It is worth pointing out that one of the target genes, white, showed only a limited, non-statistically significant reduction in transcripts when the white gene was targeted by CasRx, which was in contrast to the clear pigment reduction phenotype. It is hypothesized that this may be due to the fact that 1) the timing of RNA-seq sample collection was not well aligned with the timing when the white gene reach its peak expression during early development, and 2) the localized expression of the white gene in the eyes makes it challenging to collect the relevant tissues during early development phase when only whole-body sample collection is feasible. To reduce collateral activity in the CasRx system, future studies are called for to fully understand the mechanisms underlying the off-target phenomenon system at the organismal level.
Interestingly, a recent study35 describing RNA-targeting Cas13 tools in flies appeared to ameliorate the general toxicity associated with CasRx expression, for several possible reasons. Firstly, the authors recoded the Cas13 transgenes to optimize expression in Drosophila and utilized a more weakly-expressing promoter (actin 5C) as compared to the ubiquitin promoter used in the present study, likely leading to lower levels of Cas13 expression and thus less toxicity. Indeed, this is supported by the observations that UASt-driven CasRx and dCasRx expression was not, by itself, toxic, as this study (and the authors in 35) did not observe any obvious lethality in UASt-CasRx flies. Furthermore, these authors encoded their gRNAs differently compared to this study, which may have affected their expression and reduced the toxicity of the system in transheterozygous Cas13/gRNA flies. For example, in their study two gRNAs were expressed using the U6:3 promoter and flanked by tRNAs to enable gRNA processing upon tRNA maturation without requiring CasRx35. Conversely, in this study, the gRNAs were encoded as arrays targeting up to 4 locations per gene and mimicking the endogenous Cas13 array structure found in bacteria, which requires the Cas13 enzyme to process each gRNA. These different approaches may have led to differences in gRNA expression levels and other factors that may have inherent effects on the toxicity of the whole system. Finally, Huynh et al. targeted different genes than those targeted in the present study, which result in differences in target-Cas/gRNA interaction and collateral activity and may have effects on the observed levels of lethality. These differences in observed toxicity warrant further investigation to identify ways that the overall systems can be improved.
Overall, this study is the first demonstration of a functional genetically encoded programmable RNA-targeting Cas system in D. melanogaster, albeit further optimization of the CasRx system (in line with what is reported35) will be required to further reduce the off-target-associated lethality and increase the efficacy of CasRx on-target cleavage. RNA-targeting with Cas enzymes is a rapidly evolving field with many potential applications ranging from insect vector control to therapeutic usages1,2,3,4,5,6,7, and this protocol offer a starter package for anyone interested in designing their first CasRx system in flies, while being compatible with customization and further optimization of the system. The examples presented here demonstrate a range of results one may encounter during implementation of this system in vivo and may serve as benchmarks for other users in evaluating the performance of CasRx system in their applications.

Since the advent of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) technologies, much of the focus in this field has been on DNA editing, which offers transformative applications in medicine and biotechnology1. Permanent alteration of DNA sequences, however, is not always desired due to ethical considerations. In light of this, recent studies began developing CRISPR-based tools for targeting RNA and demonstrated that CRISPR technologies can indeed be used for RNA-targeting in a variety of biological systems2,3,4,5,6,7. In many of these systems tested, the current widely used approach for targeting RNA and transcript reduction is RNA interference (RNAi), which is far from perfect, often exhibiting varied efficacy and high off-target activity when used in vivo8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Therefore, given the status of these technologies, it is worth further exploring the potentials of CRISPR-based tools for RNA targeting.
One notable recent study reported that ribonuclease CasRx, a member of the Cas13d class, can efficiently reduce gene transcript levels in human cell culture and possesses an attractive off-target profile4. This finding led to the question of whether this new ribonuclease can maintain its efficacy and low off-target rate for RNA targeting at the organismal level. A recent study addressed this question by showing that the CasRx system can be used to achieve ubiquitous and tissue-specific gene transcript reduction in Drosophila melanogaster5.
To streamline usability of this recently published approach, this protocol details the methods from this recent work, which consists of three main parts: 1) ubiquitous in vivo&#160;RNA targeting using a two-component CasRx system; 2) ubiquitous in vivo exogenous RNA targeting using a three-component CasRx system; and 3) tissue-specificin vivo RNA targeting using a three-component CasRx system.
Guide RNAs (gRNA) targeting different target genes under the control of a ubiquitous promoter were designed and fly lines expressing these gRNA-containing constructs were generated. CasRx constructs under the control of either a ubiquitous promoter, or a conditional upstream activation sequence (UASt) promoter activatable by the GAL4 transcription factor, were also designed and fly lines harboring these CasRx-containing constructs generated. Catalytically inactive CasRx constructs, dCasRx, were designed and used as negative controls. Ubiquitous RNA targeting in flies is achieved by crossing gRNA-expressing fly lines with ubiquitously CasRx-expressing fly lines. The progeny expressing both the gRNA construct targeting a specific gene transcript and the CasRx protein has a ubiquitous reduction of targeted gene transcripts. Tissue-specific RNA targeting in flies is achieved by first crossing gRNA-expressing flies with UASt-CasRx expressing flies, obtaining transheterozygous flies carrying both gRNA and UASt-CasRx constructs. Such flies in turn are crossed with tissue-specific GAL4-expressing flies, resulting in the generation of tissue-specific CasRx expression and RNA-targeting in flies.
The programmable nature of the CasRx system offers the possibility of customization and optimization to help achieve high efficacy and low off-target activity for in vivo RNA targeting. Potential applications of CRISPR-based RNA-targeting are numerous, including replacing RNAi in the laboratory and contributing to insect vector control in the wild. Of the latter, one of the global unmet needs is the development of efficient tools to combat infections of RNA viruses transmitted via mosquitos. Many RNA viruses, such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya virus, are transmitted via mosquitoes, affecting human health, and contributing mortality. Many proposals for engineering mosquito populations with virus resistance for disease prevention have been made; however, no current technology is able to make mosquitoes simultaneously resistant to all significant RNA viruses18,19,20,21,22,23. RNA-targeting Cas systems may provide a starting point for such a technology by enabling a programmable platform for targeting all mosquito-borne RNA viruses.

<table><tbody><tr><td>100% Grape Juice</td><td>Welch Foods Inc.</td><td>N/A</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Active Dry Yeast (908g)</td><td>Red Star Yeast Company, LLC</td><td>N/A</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>DMC4500 color camera</td><td>Leica Microsystems</td><td>DMC4500</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System</td><td>Promega</td><td>E1910</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>GAL4-GMR flies</td><td>Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center</td><td>29967</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>GAL4-y flies</td><td>Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center</td><td>44373</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Glomax 20/20 Luminometer</td><td>Promega</td><td>E5331</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Illumina HiSeq2500 Sequencer</td><td>Illumina, Inc.</td><td>HiSeq2500</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>M165FC fluorescent stereomicroscope</td><td>Leica Microsystems</td><td>M165FC</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Nanodrop One&lt;sup&gt;C&lt;/sup&gt; UV-vis spectrophotometer</td><td>ThermoFisher</td><td>NDONEC-W</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library Prep Kit</td><td>New England Biolabs, Inc.</td><td>E7770</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid # 112686</td><td>Addgene</td><td>112686</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid # 112688</td><td>Addgene</td><td>112688</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid # 132416</td><td>Addgene</td><td>132416</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid # 132417</td><td>Addgene</td><td>132417</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid # 132419</td><td>Addgene</td><td>132419</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid # 132420</td><td>Addgene</td><td>132420</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid # 132421</td><td>Addgene</td><td>132421</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid # 132422</td><td>Addgene</td><td>132422</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid # 132425</td><td>Addgene</td><td>132425</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid # 132426</td><td>Addgene</td><td>132426</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid # 133304</td><td>Addgene</td><td>133304</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid # 164586</td><td>Addgene</td><td>164586</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid #132418</td><td>Addgene</td><td>132418</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>plasmid pJFRC81</td><td>Addgene</td><td>36432</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Qiagen RNeasy Mini Kit</td><td>Qiagen</td><td>74104</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Restriction endonucleases AscI</td><td>New England Biolabs Inc.</td><td>R0558L</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Restriction endonucleases NotI</td><td>New England Biolabs Inc.</td><td>R0189L</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Restriction endonucleases PacI</td><td>New England Biolabs Inc.</td><td>R0547L</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Restriction endonucleases PstI</td><td>New England Biolabs Inc.</td><td>R0140L</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Restriction endonucleases SwaI</td><td>New England Biolabs Inc.</td><td>R0604L</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Restriction endonucleases XbaI</td><td>New England Biolabs Inc.</td><td>R0145L</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>RNA 6000 Pico Kit for Bioanalyzer</td><td>Agilent Technologies</td><td>5067-1513</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Turbo DNase</td><td>Invitrogen</td><td>AM2238</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>U6-3:4-gRNA-Fluc flies</td><td>Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center</td><td>84125</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>U6-3:4-gRNA-GFP; OpIE2-GFP flies</td><td>Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center</td><td>84986</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>U6-3:4-gRNA-N flies</td><td>Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center</td><td>84122</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>U6-3:4-gRNA-w flies</td><td>Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center</td><td>84124</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>U6-3:4-gRNA-y flies</td><td>Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center</td><td>84123</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>UASt-CasRx flies</td><td>Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center</td><td>84121</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>UASt-dCasRx flies</td><td>Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center</td><td>84120</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ubiq-CasRx flies</td><td>Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center</td><td>84118</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ubiq-dCasRx flies</td><td>Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center</td><td>84119</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ubiq-Firefly-T2A-eGFP-Ubiq-Renilla flies</td><td>Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center</td><td>84127</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Zymoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kits</td><td>Zymo Research Corporation</td><td>D4007</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

ubiquitous and tissue-specific rna targeting in drosophila melanogaster using crispr/casrx

CasRx, a member of the RNA-targeting Cas13 family, is a promising new addition of the CRISPR/Cas technologies in efficient gene transcript reduction with an attractive off-target profile at both cellular and organismal levels. It is recently reported that the CRISPR/CasRx system can be used to achieve ubiquitous and tissue-specific gene transcript reduction in Drosophila melanogaster. This paper details the methods from the recent work, consisting of three parts: 1) ubiquitous&#160;in vivo endogenous RNA targeting using a two-component CasRx system; 2) ubiquitous in vivo exogenous RNA targeting using a three-component CasRx system; and 3) tissue-specific in vivo RNA targeting using a three-component CasRx system. The effects of RNA targeting observed include targeted gene specific phenotypic changes, targeted RNA transcript reduction, and occasional lethality phenotypes associated with high expression of CasRx protein and collateral activity. Overall, these results showed that the CasRx system is capable of target RNA transcript reduction at the organismal level in a programmable and efficient manner, demonstrating that in vivo transcriptome targeting, and engineering is feasible and lays the foundation for future in vivo CRISPR-based RNA targeting technologies.

Ubiquitous in vivo RNA Targeting Using a Two-Component CasRx System 
The F1 transheterozygous flies expressing both the Ubiq-CasRx and the gRNA (targeting both endogenous and exogenous genes) constructs showed marked phenotypes compared to the control flies expressing the Ubiq-dCasRx and gRNA constructs (Figure 2 and Figure 4). Specifically, the transheterozygous CasRx flies have significantly lower levels of survival rate compared to the transheterozgyous dCasRx flies, indicating toxicity of the Ubiq-CasRx system (Figure 2A and Figure 4A). It is worth noting that both transheterozygous CasRx and dCasRx flies have less than 50% inheritance rate, which is the expected ratio based on Mendelian genetics. Of the three target genes, the Ubiq-CasRx/+; U6-gRNAN/+ flies and Ubiq-CasRx/+; U6-gRNAy/+ flies are non-viable (0% inheritance) and did not grow beyond the second instar larvae stage (Figure 2A-2B). The surviving Ubiq-CasRx/+; U6-gRNAw/+ flies, the inheritance of which was 12.9%, showed a distinct fully-penetrant white-eyed phenotype (Figure 2B). In addition to observable traits associated with CasRx, we were able to confirm significant reduction of target gene transcripts for 3 target genes: Notch, yellow, and GFP (Figure 2E-2G). Reduction of white gene transcripts was observed in Ubiq-CasRx/+, U6-gRNAw/+ flies, compared to the control Ubiq-dCasRx/+, U6-gRNAw/+ flies, though the reduction was not statistically significant (Figure 2E - 2F). Evidence of off-target activity induced by CasRx was found when comparing the differentially expressed transcripts between samples from CasRx-expressing flies and samples from dCasRx-expressing flies (Figure 2E, 2G). The number of non-target transcripts significantly differentially expressed are as follows: white, 253 (1.4% of total transcripts); Notch, 300 (1.7%); yellow, 41 (0.23%); GFP, 5,880 (33%) (Figure2G). Out of the total 17,779 different transcripts, 6 non-target transcripts were significantly differentially expressed in all 4 groups of samples. One of the 6 transcripts identified was Gadd45, a gene involved in apoptosis and cellular arrest in flies, raising the possibility that the enzymatic action of CasRx may either directly trigger cellular apoptosis or indirectly trigger misexpression of other genes, which in turn leads to apoptosis. Finally, it is worth noting that the Ubiq-CasRx and Ubiq-dCasRx flies were not established as homozygous stocks, presumably due to toxicity conferred by high ubiquitous expression. As a result, heterozygous Ubiq-CasRx/CyO and Ubiq-dCasRx/CyO flies were used for crossing with homozygous gRNA fly lines. In sum, the two-component Ubiq-CasRx system is able to achieve ubiquitous RNA targeting for both endogenous and exogenous targets resulting in observable phenotypes and transcript reduction. These results also showed that CasRx-mediated RNA targeting may introduce toxicity in vivo.
Ubiquitous in vivo exogenous RNA Targeting Using a Three-Component CasRx System 
The results from the two-step cross showed that despite the exogenous nature of the target gene (i.e., Fluc), expressing all three transgenes in F2 triple transheterozygotes (Ubiq-CasRx/+; gRNAFluc/Ubiq-Fluc-Ubiq-Rluc) resulted in 100% lethality compared to control crosses involving Ubiq-dCasRx, where no lethality was observed in the F2 triple transheterozygotes (Ubiq-dCasRx/+; gRNAFluc/Ubiq-Fluc-Ubiq-Rluc) (Figure 3B-C). More specifically, only the combination of all three transgenes (Ubiq-CasRx/+; gRNAFluc/Ubiq-Fluc-Ubiq-Rluc) resulted in 100% lethality (Figure 3B and D), while (Ubiq-CasRx/+; gRNAFluc/TM6) and (Ubiq-CasRx/+; Ubiq-Fluc-Ubiq-Rluc/TM6) genotypes were viable and lacked phenotypes with their inheritance rates matching the expected Mendelian transmission rates, suggesting that the availability of the target sequence (i.e., firefly luciferase) in combination with Ubiq-CasRx/+ and the gRNAFluc&#160;is what resulted in the observed lethality phenotypes, presumably stemming from the collateral activity of Cas13 enzymes2,8. In addition, no distinguishable phenotypes or dramatic influence on inheritance in F1 transheterozygotes (Ubiq-CasRx/+; gRNAFluc/+ or Ubiq-CasRx/+; Ubiq-Fluc-Ubiq-Rluc/+) were observed compared to Ubiq-dCasRx controls (Ubiq-dCasRx/+; gRNAFluc/+ or Ubiq-dCasRx/+; Ubiq-Fluc-Ubiq-Rluc/+) (Figure 3B), indicating that a catalytically active enzyme is essential to obtain the lethality phenotypes observed. Furthermore, Fluc and Rluc expression levels in flies of all viable genotypes did not show significant reduction in Fluc expression in the Ubiq-dCasRx triple transheterozygotes (Ubiq-dCasRx/+; gRNAFluc/Ubiq-Fluc-Ubiq-Rluc) compared to dual luciferase reporter controls. This suggests that Fluc protein expression levels were not reduced by dCasRx targeting (Figure 3D). Taken together, the common lethality phenotype in the two different CasRx-mediated ubiquitous RNA targeting experiments indicate that when used on tissues ubiquitously, CasRx-mediated RNA targeting can be toxic to the organism.
Tissue-specific in vivo RNA Targeting Using a Three-Component CasRx System 
The high level of toxicity observed in ubiquitous RNA targeting experiments prompted us to explore the tissue-specific RNA targeting using a three-component CasRx system design detailed in the methods section. Indeed, the level of toxicity observed was reduced when the overall CasRx expression was lowered using the UASt promoter compared to that of the Ubiq promoter, this is exemplified in three aspects: 1) the UASt-CasRx and UASt-dCasRx lines were maintained as homozygous lines, though based on the two-step cross scheme double balanced UASt-CasRx and UASt-dCasRx lines were used to perform the crosses, 2) all F2 generation dCasRx triple transheterozygous inheritance rates matched the expected 25% Mendelian inheritance rate, and 3) the F2 generation CasRx triple transheterozygous lethality phenotype was moderately reduced. In the white targeting experiment, of the 25% Mendelian inheritance rates expected in the F2 triple transheterozygotes, only 0.57% viable adult flies (UASt-CasRx/+; gRNAw/GMR-Gal4) were observed, all of which displayed severe eye specific pigmentation and morphology phenotypes (Figure 4A and 4B). For the white-targeting cross, the CasRx-expressing triple transheterozygous F2 inheritance rate was significantly lower than that of the dCasRx-expressing triple transheterozygous control group (27.6%) (Figure 4A). In the Notch targeting experiment, CasRx-expressing triple tranheterozygous carrying all three transgenes were 100% lethal, while the dCasRx control inheritance rate was 29.3% (Figure 4A). In the yellow targeting experiment, F2 triple transheterozygous CasRx-expressing, gRNAy, and y-GAL4 showed marginal chitin pigment reduction as small patches of yellow cuticle on the thorax and abdomen with an inheritance rate of 2.67%, much lower than that of the dCasRx control group (25.2%) (Figure4A). All dCasRx control triple transheterozygous flies did not present obvious phenotypes as the CasRx-expressing flies, indicating that catalytic activity of CasRx contributed to the phenotypes observed. The low inheritance rate in the CasRx triple transheterozygous group suggested that two sources of toxicity exist in CasRx RNA targeting: one is associated with high expression of CasRx, the toxicity of which was reduced by restrictive CasRx expression, the other is associated with the collateral activity. Taken together, these results showed that the CasRx system can achieve tissue-specific in vivo RNA targeting by leveraging the classical Gal4/UASt system and in the meantime reduce the toxicity. However, toxicity and occasional lethality phenotypes were still observed at a lower level of severity compared to that of the ubiquitous approaches, indicating that collateral cleavage activity is associated with toxicity.
<img alt="Figure 1" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/62154/62154fig01.jpg" /> 
Figure 1: General overview of RNA targeting using a Cas13D system. (A) Schematics of the one-step genetic cross in the ubiquitous in vivo RNA targeting using a two-component CasRx system. (B) Schematics of a two-step genetic cross in the ubiquitous&#160;in vivo exogenous RNA targeting using the three-component CasRx system. (C) Schematics of a two-step genetic cross in the tissue-specific in vivo RNA targeting using a three-component CasRx system. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/62154/62154fig01large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 2" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/62154/62154fig02.jpg" /> 
Figure 2: Ubiquitous in vivo RNA targeting using a two-component CasRx system (reprinted5). (A) Total inheritance percentages of transheterozygous flies inheriting Ubiq-CasRx (or Ubiq-dCasRx) and gRNAs. Blue shading in the box plot indicates phenotype penetrance. (B) Phenotypes of transheterozygous flies. Arrows indicate tissue necrosis in the eye. Black and white fly marked with &#39;&#39;X&#39;&#39; represents lethality. (C) Total inheritance percentages of transheterozygous flies of bidirectional crosses between Ubiq-CasRx (or Ubiq-dCasRx) and gRNAGFP-OpIE2-GFP flies. M, maternal inheritance of CasRx; P, paternal inheritance of CasRx. (D) F1 larvae progenies in the paternal cross. (E) Transcripts&#39; maximum a posteriori estimates for the logarithmic fold change. DESeq2 pipeline was used. (F) Transcripts per million (TPM) targeted with CasRx or dCasRx. (G) CasRx-depentent differentially expressed transcript percentage of transcripts. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/62154/62154fig02large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 3" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/62154/62154fig03.jpg" /> 
Figure 3: Ubiquitous in vivo exogenous RNA targeting using a three-component CasRx system. (A) Schematics of the two-step genetic cross. (B) Total inheritance percentages for all genotypes emerging in the F2 generation. Inheriting all three transgenes (Ubiq-CasRx, Ubiq-Fluc-Ubiq-Rluc, and gRNAFLuc) in F2 progeny resulted in 100% lethality and was significantly lower compared to the Ubiq-dCasRx triple transheterozygotes control group (p = 0.001, t-test). (C) Carrying Ubiq-CasRx/gRNAFluc alone or Ubiq-CasRx and Ubiq-Fluc-Ubiq-Rluc alone did not lead to severe lethality, and inheritance ratios between Ubiq-CasRx and Ubiq-dCasRx transheterozygotes were not significantly different (p = 0.41 and p = 0.51, respectively, t-test). (D) Luciferase ratios normalizing Fluc readings to Rluc readings. Triple transheterozygous flies expressing Ubiq-CasRx, Ubiq-Fluc-Ubiq-Rluc, gRNAFLuc were embryonic lethal, which was represented by a fly with an &#34;X&#34;, and as a result luciferase expression was not measured. Fluc/Rluc ratio of Ubiq-CasRx/+, Ubiq-Fluc-Ubiq-Rluc/TM6, Stb transheterozygotes was significantly lower than that of the other Ubiq-Fluc-Ubiq-Rluc-expressing groups (p = 1.2e-06 or lower, t-test). The results from the gRNAFLuc-only group were significantly lower than that of all other groups (p = 1.2e-06 or lower, t-test). <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/62154/62154fig03large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Figure 4" class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/62154/62154fig04.jpg" /> 
Figure 4: Tissue-specific in vivo RNA targeting using a three-component CasRx system (reprinted5). (A) Total inheritance percentage of triple transheterozygous flies carrying three transgenes (UASt-CasRx or UASt-dCasRx, gRNAs, and Gal4-driver. (B) Phenotypes of the triple transheterozygous flies. The white arrow indicates chitin pigment reduction in the thorax. Black and white fly marked with &#39;&#39;X&#39;&#39; represents lethality. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/62154/62154fig04large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Construct</td>
			<td>Description</td>
			<td>Primer</td>
			<td>Primer Sequence (5&#8217; to 3&#8217;)</td>
			<td>PCR Template</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td rowspan="2">OA-1050E</td>
			<td rowspan="2">CasRx</td>
			<td>1050E.C3</td>
			<td>TACTAATTTTCCAC 
			ATCTCTATTTTGAC 
			CCGCAGATTAATTA 
			ATGAGCCCCAAGA 
			AGAA</td>
			<td rowspan="2">pNLS-RfxCas13d-NLS-HA (pCasRx)</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1050E.C4</td>
			<td>CAATTGATTTGTTA 
			TTTTAAAAACGATT 
			CATTCTAGCTAGCT 
			TAAGCGTAATCTGG 
			AACA</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td rowspan="2">OA-1050R</td>
			<td rowspan="2">dCasRx</td>
			<td>1050E.C3</td>
			<td>TACTAATTTTCCAC 
			ATCTCTATTTTGAC 
			CCGCAGATTAATTA 
			ATGAGCCCCAAGA 
			AGAA</td>
			<td rowspan="2">pNLS-dRfxCas13d-NLS-HA (pdCasRx)</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1050E.C4</td>
			<td>CAATTGATTTGTTA 
			TTTTAAAAACGATT 
			CATTCTAGCTAGCT 
			TAAGCGTAATCTG 
			GAACA</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td rowspan="4">OA-1050L</td>
			<td rowspan="2">UASt promoter</td>
			<td>1041.C9</td>
			<td>GCGGGTTCTCGA 
			CGGTCACGGCGG 
			GCATGTCGACGC 
			GGCCGCAACCAA 
			CAACACTAGTAG</td>
			<td rowspan="2">pJFRC81</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1041.C11</td>
			<td>CTGGCCTCCACC 
			TTTCTCTTCTTCT 
			TGGGGCTCATGT 
			TTAAACCCAATT 
			CCCTATTCAGA</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td rowspan="2">CasRx</td>
			<td>1050L.C1</td>
			<td>AATACAAGAAGA 
			GAACTCTGAATA 
			GGGAATTGGGT 
			TTAAACATGAGC 
			CCCAAGAAGAA</td>
			<td rowspan="2">pCasRx</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1050E.C4</td>
			<td>CAATTGATTTGT 
			TATTTTAAAAAC 
			GATTCATTCTA 
			GCTAGCTTAAG 
			CGTAATCTGGA 
			ACA</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td rowspan="4">OA-1050S</td>
			<td rowspan="2">UASt promoter</td>
			<td>1041.C9</td>
			<td>GCGGGTTCTC 
			GACGGTCACG 
			GCGGGCATGT 
			CGACGCGGCC 
			GCAACCAACAA 
			CACTAGTAG</td>
			<td rowspan="2">pJFRC81</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1041.C11</td>
			<td>CTGGCCTCCA 
			CCTTTCTCTTC 
			TTCTTGGGGCT 
			CATGTTTAAAC 
			CCAATTCCCTA 
			TTCAGA</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td rowspan="2">dCasRx</td>
			<td>1050L.C1</td>
			<td>AATACAAGAAG 
			AGAACTCTGAAT 
			AGGGAATTGGG 
			TTTAAACATGAG 
			CCCCAAGAAGAA</td>
			<td rowspan="2">pdCasRx</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1050E.C4</td>
			<td>CAATTGATTTGT 
			TATTTTAAAAAC 
			GATTCATTCTAG 
			CTAGCTTAAGCG 
			TAATCTGGAACA</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td rowspan="2">OA-1043</td>
			<td rowspan="2">U6:3 promoter</td>
			<td>1043.C1</td>
			<td>GGGAATTGGGA 
			ATTGGGCAATAT 
			TTAAATGGCGGC 
			GCGCCGAATTCT 
			TTTTTGCTCACCT</td>
			<td rowspan="2">Addgene plasmid #164586</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1043.C23</td>
			<td>ACACTAGTGGAT 
			CTCTAGAGGTAC 
			CGTTGCGGCCG 
			CAAAAAAGTTGT 
			AATAGCCCCTCA 
			AAACTGGACCTT 
			CCACAACTGCAG 
			CCGACGTTAAAT 
			TGAAA</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td rowspan="6">OA-1052B</td>
			<td rowspan="2">Ubiq promoter</td>
			<td>1052B.C1</td>
			<td>GGGAATTGGGCA 
			ATATTTAAATGGC 
			GGCTGCAGCGC 
			GCAGATCGCCGAT</td>
			<td rowspan="2">Addgene plasmid #112686</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1052B.C2</td>
			<td>TTTCTTTATGTTT 
			TTGGCGTCTTCC 
			ATCCTAGGTCTG 
			CGGGTCAAAATA 
			GAGATG</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td rowspan="2">T2A-eGFP</td>
			<td>908A1</td>
			<td>ATAAAGGCCAAG 
			AAGGGCGGAAA 
			GATCGCCGTGG 
			AGGGCAGAGGA 
			AGTCTTCTAACAT 
			GC</td>
			<td rowspan="2">Addgene plasmid #112686</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>908A2</td>
			<td>TTGTTATTTTAAAA 
			ACGATTCATTCTA 
			GGCGATCGCTTA 
			CTTGTACAGCTC 
			GTCCATGCC</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td rowspan="2">Reversed Ubiq promoter</td>
			<td>908A3</td>
			<td>ACCGTGACCTAC 
			ATCGTCGACACTA 
			GTGGATCTCTAGA 
			CGCGCAGATCGC 
			CGATG</td>
			<td rowspan="2">Addgene plasmid #112686</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>908A4</td>
			<td>GGATCATAAACTT 
			TCGAAGTCATGC 
			GGCCGCTCTGCG 
			GGTCAAAATAGAG 
			ATGT</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
Table 1: List of molecular construct and primers used in this study. This list includes all constructs (both the ID and description) and each construct&#39;s associated primers (both the ID and sequences (5&#39; to 3&#39;)) and templates used.

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about Ubiquitous and Tissue-specific RNA Targeting in Drosophila Melanogaster using CRISPR/CasRx at JoVE.com

Ubiquitous and Tissue-specific RNA Targeting in Drosophila Melanogaster using CRISPR/CasRx

This article outlines a detailed protocol for using the RNA-targeting Cas13D enzyme (RfxCas13D) in flies.

Ubiquitous and Tissue-specific RNA Targeting in Drosophila Melanogaster using CRISPR/CasRx

CasRx, a member of the RNA-targeting Cas13 family, is a promising new addition of the CRISPR/Cas technologies in efficient gene transcript reduction with ...

ubiquitous-tissue-specific-rna-targeting-drosophila-melanogaster

Research

JoVE Journal

Immunology and Infection

3.1K Views.  University of California. Zoals ons protocol laat zien, kunnen CRISPR CasRx-technologieën worden gebruikt om alomtegenwoordige en weefselspecifieke gentranscriptreducties in fruitvliegen te bereiken. Onze techniek biedt een startpakket voor iedereen die geïnteresseerd is in het gebruik van CRISPR-gebaseerde gentranscriptreductie in fruitvliegen, terwijl het compatibel is met verdere aanpassing en optimalisatie. Om een alomtegenwoordige in vivo RNA-targeting op te zetten met behulp van een tweecomponenten CasRx-syste...

Video: Ubiquitous and Tissue-specific RNA Targeting in Drosophila Melanogaster using CRISPR/CasRx

Efficient Production and Identification of CRISPR/Cas9-generated Gene Knockouts in the Model System Danio rerio

Characterization of the clustered, regularly interspaced, short, palindromic repeat (CRISPR) system of Streptococcus pyogenes has enabled the development of a customizable platform to rapidly generate gene modifications in a wide variety of organisms, including zebrafish. CRISPR-based genome editing uses a single guide RNA (sgRNA) to target a CRISPR-associated (Cas) endonuclease to a genomic DNA (gDNA) target of interest, where the Cas endonuclease generates a double-strand break (DSB). Repair of DSBs by error-prone mechanisms lead to insertions and/or deletions (indels). This can cause frameshift mutations that often introduce a premature stop codon within the coding sequence, thus creating a protein-null allele. CRISPR-based genome engineering requires only a few molecular components and is easily introduced into zebrafish embryos by microinjection. This protocol describes the methods used to generate CRISPR reagents for zebrafish microinjection and to identify fish exhibiting germline transmission of CRISPR-modified genes. These methods include in vitro transcription of sgRNAs, microinjection of CRISPR reagents, identification of indels induced at the target site using a PCR-based method called a heteroduplex mobility assay (HMA), and characterization of the indels using both a low throughput and a powerful next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based approach that can analyze multiple PCR products collected from heterozygous fish. This protocol is streamlined to minimize both the number of fish required and the types of equipment needed to perform the analyses. Furthermore, this protocol is designed to be amenable for use by laboratory personal of all levels of experience including undergraduates, enabling this powerful tool to be economically employed by any research group interested in performing CRISPR-based genomic modification in zebrafish.

Efficient Production and Identification of CRISPR/Cas9-generated Gene Knockouts in the Model System Danio rerio

Targeted genome editing in the model system Danio rerio (zebrafish) has been greatly facilitated by the emergence of CRISPR-based approaches. Herein, we describe a streamlined, robust protocol for generation and identification of CRISPR-derived nonsense alleles that incorporates the heteroduplex mobility assay and identification of mutations using next-generation sequencing.

Characterization of the clustered, regularly interspaced, short, palindromic repeat (CRISPR) system of Streptococcus pyogenes has enabled the development ...

Genetics

A Rapid and Facile Pipeline for Generating Genomic Point Mutants in C. elegans Using CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins

The clustered regularly interspersed palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) prokaryotic adaptive immune defense system has been co-opted as a powerful tool for precise eukaryotic genome engineering. Here, we present a rapid and simple method using chimeric single guide RNAs (sgRNA) and CRISPR-Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) for the efficient and precise generation of genomic point mutations in C. elegans. We describe a pipeline for sgRNA target selection, homology-directed repair (HDR) template design, CRISPR-Cas9-RNP complexing and delivery, and a genotyping strategy that enables the robust and rapid identification of correctly edited animals. Our approach not only permits the facile generation and identification of desired genomic point mutant animals, but also facilitates the detection of other complex indel alleles in approximately 4 - 5 days with high efficiency and a reduced screening workload.

A Rapid and Facile Pipeline for Generating Genomic Point Mutants in C. elegans Using CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoproteins

Here, we present a method to engineer the genome of C. elegans using CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins and homology dependent repair templates.

The clustered regularly interspersed palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) prokaryotic adaptive immune defense system has been ...

CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.

The bacterial Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR)/Streptococcus pyogenes CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) system has been harnessed by researchers to study important biologically relevant problems. The unparalleled power of the CRISPR/Cas genome editing method allows researchers to precisely edit any locus of their choosing, thereby facilitating an increased understanding of gene function. Several methods for editing the C. elegans genome by CRISPR/Cas9 have been described previously. Here, we discuss and demonstrate a method which utilizes in vitro assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes and the dpy-10 co-CRISPR marker for screening. Specifically, in this article, we go through the step-by-step process of introducing premature stop codons into the C. elegans rbm-3.2 gene by homology-directed repair using this method of CRISPR/Cas9 editing. This relatively simple editing method can be used to study the function of any gene of interest and allows for the generation of homozygous-edited C. elegans by CRISPR/Cas9 editing&#160;in less than two weeks.

CRISPR/Cas9 Editing of the C. elegans rbm-3.2 Gene using the dpy-10 Co-CRISPR Screening Marker and Assembled Ribonucleoprotein Complexes.

The goal of this protocol is to enable seamless CRISPR/Cas9 editing of the C. elegans genome using assembled ribonucleoprotein complexes and the dpy-10 co-CRISPR marker for screening. This protocol can be used to make a variety of genetic modifications in C. elegans including insertions, deletions, gene replacements and codon substitutions.

The bacterial Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat (CRISPR)/Streptococcus pyogenes CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) system has been ...

An Efficient Strategy for Generating Tissue-specific Binary Transcription Systems in Drosophila by Genome Editing

Binary transcription systems are powerful genetic tools widely used for visualizing and manipulating cell fate and gene expression in specific groups of cells or tissues in model organisms. These systems contain two components as separate transgenic lines. A driver line expresses a transcriptional activator under the control of tissue-specific promoters/enhancers, and a reporter/effector line harbors a target gene placed downstream to the binding site of the transcription activator. Animals harboring both components induce tissue-specific transactivation of a target gene expression. Precise spatiotemporal expression of the gene in targeted tissues is critical for unbiased interpretation of cell/gene activity. Therefore, developing a method for generating exclusive cell/tissue-specific driver lines is essential. Here we present a method to generate highly tissue-specific targeted expression system by employing a &#34;Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat/CRISPR-associated&#34; (CRISPR/Cas)-based genome editing technique. In this method, the endonuclease Cas9 is targeted by two chimeric guide RNAs (gRNA) to specific sites in the first coding exon of a gene in the Drosophila genome to create double-strand breaks (DSB). Subsequently, using an exogenous donor plasmid containing the transactivator sequence, the cell-autonomous repair machinery enables homology-directed repair (HDR) of the DSB, resulting in precise deletion and replacement of the exon with the transactivator sequence. The knocked-in transactivator is expressed exclusively in cells where the cis-regulatory elements of the replaced gene are functional. The detailed step-by-step protocol presented here for generating a binary transcriptional driver expressed in Drosophila fgf/branchless-producing epithelial/neuronal cells can be adopted for any gene- or tissue-specific expression.

An Efficient Strategy for Generating Tissue-specific Binary Transcription Systems in Drosophila by Genome Editing

Here, we present a method for generating tissue-specific binary transcription systems in Drosophila by replacing the first coding exon of genes with transcription drivers. The CRISPR/Cas9-based method places a transactivator sequence under the endogenous regulation of a replaced gene, and consequently facilitates transctivator expression exclusively in gene-specific spatiotemporal patterns.

Binary transcription systems are powerful genetic tools widely used for visualizing and manipulating cell fate and gene expression in specific groups of ...

Developmental Biology

Embryo Microinjection and Knockout Mutant Identification of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome-Edited Helicoverpa Armigera (H&#252;bner)

The cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, is one of the most destructive pests in the world. A combination of molecular genetics, physiology, functional genomics, and behavioral studies has made H. armigera a model species in Lepidoptera Noctuidae. To study the in vivo functions of and interactions between different genes, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/ associated protein 9 (Cas9) genome editing technology is a convenient and effective method used for performing functional genomic studies. In this study, we provide a step-by-step systematic method to complete gene knockout in H. armigera using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The design and synthesis of guide RNA (gRNA) are described in detail. Then, the subsequent steps consisting of gene-specific primer design for guide RNA (gRNA) creation, embryo collection, microinjection, insect rearing, and mutant detection are summarized. Finally, troubleshooting advice and notes are provided to improve the efficiency of gene editing. Our method will serve as a reference for the application of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in H. armigera as well as other Lepidopteran moths.

Embryo Microinjection and Knockout Mutant Identification of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome-Edited Helicoverpa Armigera H&#252;bner

Presented here is a protocol of Helicoverpa armigera (H&#252;bner) embryo microinjection and knockout mutant identification created by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Mutant insects enable further research of gene function and interaction among different genes in vivo.

The cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, is one of the most destructive pests in the world. A combination of molecular genetics, physiology, functional ...

Behavior

In Vitro Selection of Engineered Transcriptional Repressors for Targeted Epigenetic Silencing

Gene inactivation is instrumental to study gene function and represents a promising strategy for the treatment of a broad range of diseases. Among traditional technologies, RNA interference suffers from partial target abrogation and the requirement for life-long treatments. In contrast, artificial nucleases can impose stable gene inactivation through induction of a DNA double strand break (DSB), but recent studies are questioning the safety of this approach. Targeted epigenetic editing via engineered transcriptional repressors (ETRs) may represent a solution, as a single administration of specific ETR combinations can lead to durable silencing without inducing DNA breaks.
ETRs are proteins containing a programmable DNA-binding domain (DBD) and effectors from naturally occurring transcriptional repressors. Specifically, a combination of three ETRs equipped with the KRAB domain of human ZNF10, the catalytic domain of human DNMT3A and human DNMT3L, was shown to induce heritable repressive epigenetic states on the ETR-target gene. The hit-and-run nature of this platform, the lack of impact on the DNA sequence of the target, and the possibility to revert to the repressive state by DNA demethylation on demand, make epigenetic silencing a game-changing tool. A critical step is the identification of the proper ETRs&#39; position on the target gene to maximize on-target and minimize off-target silencing. Performing this step in the final ex vivo or in vivo preclinical setting can be cumbersome.
Taking the CRISPR/catalytically dead Cas9 system as a paradigmatic DBD for ETRs, this paper describes a protocol consisting of the in vitro screen of guide RNAs (gRNAs) coupled to the triple-ETR combination for efficient on-target silencing, followed by evaluation of the genome-wide specificity profile of top hits. This allows for reduction of the initial repertoire of candidate gRNAs to a short list of promising ones, whose complexity is suitable for their final&#160;evaluation in the therapeutically relevant setting of interest.

In Vitro Selection of Engineered Transcriptional Repressors for Targeted Epigenetic Silencing

Here, we present a protocol for the in vitro selection of engineered transcriptional repressors (ETRs) with high, long-term, stable, on-target silencing efficiency and low genome-wide, off-target activity. This workflow allows for reducing an initial, complex repertoire of candidate ETRs to a short list, suitable for further evaluation in therapeutically relevant settings.

Gene inactivation is instrumental to study gene function and represents a promising strategy for the treatment of a broad range of diseases. Among ...

Bioengineering

Anti-RDL and Anti-mGlutR1 Receptors Antibody Testing in Honeybee Brain Sections using CRISPR-Cas9

Cluster Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) is a gene editing technique widely used in studies of gene function. We use this method in this study to check for the specificity of antibodies developed against the insect GABAA receptor subunit Resistance to Dieldrin (RDL) and a metabotropic glutamate receptor mGlutR1 (mGluRA). The antibodies were generated in rabbits against the conjugated peptides specific to fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) as well to honeybees (Apis mellifera). We used these antibodies in honeybee brain sections to study the distribution of the receptors in honeybee brains. The antibodies were affinity purified against the peptide and tested with immunoblotting and the classical method of preadsorption with peptide conjugates to show that the antibodies are specific to the corresponding peptide conjugates against which they were raised. Here we developed the CRISPR-Cas9 technique to test for the reduction of protein targets in the brain 48 h after CRISPR-Cas9 injection with guide RNAs designed for the corresponding receptor. The CRISPR-Cas9 method can also be used in behavioral analyses in the adult bees when one or multiple genes need to be modified.

Presented here is a protocol to use the CRISPR-Cas9 system for reducing the production of a protein in the adult honeybee brain to test antibody specificity.

Cluster Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) is a gene editing technique widely used in studies of ...

Neuroscience

One-step CRISPR-based Strategy for Endogenous Gene Tagging in Drosophila melanogaster

The study of protein subcellular localization, dynamics, and regulation in live cells has been profoundly transformed by the advent of techniques that allow the tagging of endogenous genes to produce fluorescent fusion proteins. These methods enable researchers to visualize protein behavior in real time, providing valuable insights into their functions and interactions within the cellular environment. Many current gene tagging studies employ a two-step process where visible markers, such as eye color changes, are used to identify genetically modified organisms in the first step, and the visible marker is excised in the second step. Here, we present a one-step protocol to perform precise and rapid endogenous gene tagging in Drosophila melanogaster, which enables screening for engineered lines without the visible eye marker, offering a significant advantage over past methods. To screen for successful gene-tagging events, we employ a PCR-based technique to genotype individual flies by analyzing a small segment from their middle leg. Flies that pass the screening criteria are then used to produce stable stocks. Here, we detail the design and construction of CRISPR editing plasmids and methods for screening and confirmation of engineered lines. Together, this protocol improves the efficiency of endogenous gene tagging in Drosophila significantly and enables studies of cellular processes in vivo.

One-step CRISPR-based Strategy for Endogenous Gene Tagging in Drosophila melanogaster

Here, we present a simplified endogenous gene tagging protocol for Drosophila, which utilizes a PCR-based technique for marker-free identification of successful genetic modifications, facilitating the development of stable knock-in lines.

The study of protein subcellular localization, dynamics, and regulation in live cells has been profoundly transformed by the advent of techniques that ...

Construction of Homozygous Mutants of Migratory Locust Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology

The migratory locust, Locusta migratoria, is not only one of the worldwide plague locusts that caused huge economic losses to human beings but also an important research model for insect metamorphosis. The CRISPR/Cas9 system can accurately locate at a specific DNA locus and cleave within the target site, efficiently introducing double-strand breaks to induce target gene knockout or integrate new gene fragments into the specific locus. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing is a powerful tool for addressing questions encountered in locust research as well as a promising technology for locust control. This study provides a systematic protocol for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout with the complex of Cas9 protein and single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) in migratory locusts. The selection of target sites and design of sgRNA are described in detail, followed by in vitro synthesis and verification of the sgRNAs. Subsequent procedures include egg raft collection and tanned-egg separation to achieve successful microinjection with low mortality rate, egg culture,&#160;preliminary estimation of the mutation rate, locust breeding as well as detection, preservation, and passage of the mutants to ensure population stability of the edited locusts. This method can be used as a reference for CRISPR/Cas9 based gene editing applications in migratory locusts as well as in other insects.

This study provides a systematically optimized procedure of CRISPR/Cas9 ribonuclease-based construction of homozygous locust mutants as well as a detailed method for cryopreservation and resuscitation of the locust eggs.

The migratory locust, Locusta migratoria, is not only one of the worldwide plague locusts that caused huge economic losses to human beings but also an ...

Biology

Protocols for CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenesis of the Oriental Fruit Fly Bactrocera dorsalis

The Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, is a highly invasive and adaptive pest species that causes damage to citrus and over 150 other fruit crops worldwide. Since adult fruit flies have great flight capacity and females lay their eggs under the skins of fruit, insecticides requiring direct contact with the pest usually perform poorly in the field. With the development of molecular biological tools and high-throughput sequencing technology, many scientists are attempting to develop environmentally friendly pest management strategies. These include RNAi or gene editing-based pesticides that downregulate or silence genes (molecular targets), such as olfactory genes involved in searching behavior, in various insect pests. To adapt these strategies for Oriental fruit fly control, effective methods for functional gene research are needed. Genes with critical functions in the survival and reproduction of B. dorsalis serve as good molecular targets for gene knockdown and/or silencing. The CRISPR/Cas9 system is a reliable technique used for gene editing, especially in insects. This paper presents a systematic method for CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis of B. dorsalis, including the design and synthesis of guide RNAs, collecting embryos, embryo injection, insect rearing, and mutant screening. These protocols will serve as a useful guide for generating mutant flies for researchers interested in functional gene studies in B. dorsalis.

Protocols for CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenesis of the Oriental Fruit Fly Bactrocera dorsalis

This paper presents the step-by-step protocols for CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis of the Oriental fruit fly Bactrocera dorsalis. Detailed steps provided by this standardized protocol will serve as a useful guide for generating mutant flies for functional gene studies in B. dorsalis.

The Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis, is a highly invasive and adaptive pest species that causes damage to citrus and over 150 other fruit crops ...

Ubiquitous and Tissue-specific RNA Targeting in Drosophila Melanogaster using CRISPR/CasRx

Samenvatting

Meer video's verkennen