JoVE Logo

Zaloguj się

Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.

W tym Artykule

  • Podsumowanie
  • Streszczenie
  • Wprowadzenie
  • Protokół
  • Wyniki
  • Dyskusje
  • Ujawnienia
  • Podziękowania
  • Materiały
  • Odniesienia
  • Przedruki i uprawnienia

Podsumowanie

Here we describe an in vivo mutagenesis assay for small numbers of purified hematopoietic cells using the LacI transgenic mouse model. The LacI gene can be isolated to determine the frequency, location, and type of DNA mutants spontaneously arisen or after exposure to genotoxins.

Streszczenie

In recent years, it has become apparent that genomic instability is tightly related to many developmental disorders, cancers, and aging. Given that stem cells are responsible for ensuring tissue homeostasis and repair throughout life, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the stem cell population is critical for preserving genomic integrity of tissues. Therefore, significant interest has arisen in assessing the impact of endogenous and environmental factors on genomic integrity in stem cells and their progeny, aiming to understand the etiology of stem-cell based diseases.

LacI transgenic mice carry a recoverable λ phage vector encoding the LacI reporter system, in which the LacI gene serves as the mutation reporter. The result of a mutated LacI gene is the production of β-galactosidase that cleaves a chromogenic substrate, turning it blue. The LacI reporter system is carried in all cells, including stem/progenitor cells and can easily be recovered and used to subsequently infect E. coli. After incubating infected E. coli on agarose that contains the correct substrate, plaques can be scored; blue plaques indicate a mutant LacI gene, while clear plaques harbor wild-type. The frequency of blue (among clear) plaques indicates the mutant frequency in the original cell population the DNA was extracted from. Sequencing the mutant LacI gene will show the location of the mutations in the gene and the type of mutation.

The LacI transgenic mouse model is well-established as an in vivo mutagenesis assay. Moreover, the mice and the reagents for the assay are commercially available. Here we describe in detail how this model can be adapted to measure the frequency of spontaneously occurring DNA mutants in stem cell-enriched Lin-IL7R-Sca-1+cKit++(LSK) cells and other subpopulations of the hematopoietic system.

Wprowadzenie

In most tissues, differentiated cells have a limited life-span. To maintain functional integrity, long-lived, tissue-specific stem cells continuously produce progenitor cells that in turn give rise to the fully differentiated cells required for the function of that particular tissue. Stem cells also replenish their own compartment through a process called self-renewal. Thus, stem cells are responsible for maintaining the functional integrity of the tissue they reside in. Therefore, it is imperative that they are equipped with robust mechanisms to sense and potentially repair damaged DNA. If not, they may acquire multiple genomic (potentially harmful) perturbations, which can be inherited by their progeny. Understanding how stem cells safe-guard their genome during the life span of an organism is an important question and may help us understand why genomic instability is linked with cancer and some other age-related diseases (reviewed in1,2).

Controlling genomic integrity of a tissue at the level of stem cells or early progenitor cell populations can be achieved by either eliminating defective stem (or progenitor) cells via cell death, senescence or differentiation, and/or by efficient repair of damaged DNA. Recent studies have demonstrated that it is possible to measure certain types of DNA repair directly in these rare populations3-6. It was found that, for example in the hematopoietic system, double strand DNA breaks can be repaired by homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), the latter being a repair process of lower fidelity and thus increased risk of making errors. Both are being utilized in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs)4,5, however, in mice it seems it is predominantly NHEJ in HSCs whereas early progenitors cells utilize HR4. A similar observation was made for stem cells in the skin6. Interestingly, in human HSCs HR, not NHEJ, seems to be the repair mechanism of choice for double strand breaks3. Whether this functional difference between the two species is real or merely represents a technological or experimental difference remains to be seen.

A stem cell's repertoire to repair damaged DNA is likely to include other DNA repair mechanisms, such as base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER) and mismatch repair (MMR). BER and NER are responsible for repairing single or multiple base pair lesions in single stranded DNA, while MMR fixes base-base mismatches and insertion/deletion loops; these types of DNA damage cannot be repaired by NHEJ or HR. Supporting this notion are several studies from the hematopoietic system demonstrating a link between alterations in one of these pathways and abnormalities in the HSC compartment7-9, as well as an increased risk of developing myelodysplastic syndrome10-16, a disease that originates in the HSC and that is associated with increasing genomic instability as the disease progresses17. As of yet, measurements of BER, NER, and MMR directly in HSCs have not been reported.

In addition to elucidating the various processes that control tissue integrity at a mechanistic level, it is imperative to be able to measure the extent of mutated DNA, so that the consequences of aberrations in one of these processes can be tested, e.g. in normal versus genetically engineered stem cells or in old versus young. However, the development of a relevant assay is difficult because of the paucity of tissue-specific stem cells and the lack of culture conditions that preserves "stemness". Moreover, such an assay should be amendable to environmental and genetic manipulations. A possible solution to these limitations and requirements is the use of mouse models that are specifically engineered to detect DNA mutations.

Multiple transgenic mouse models for mutation detection have been developed. For example, LacI transgenic mice18 carry a recoverable λ phage vector encoding the LacI reporter system, in which the LacI gene encodes a suppressor of the Lac operator and serves as the mutation reporter. Upon mutation of the LacI gene, the Lac operator is activated and β-galactosidase is produced. β-galactosidase cleaves the chromogenic substrate X-gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-e-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside), which turns it blue. The cos sites flanking the LacI vector allows easy recovery by lambda phage proteins and subsequent infection of E. coli. After incubating infected E. coli on agarose that contains the X-gal substrate, plaques can be scored. Blue plaques contain a putative mutant Lac-I carrying phage, while clear plaques harbor non-mutants. The frequency of blue plaques (among the clear ones) indicates the mutant frequency in the original cell population the DNA was extracted from. Moreover, the λ phage hosting the LacI target can be readily sequenced using PCR techniques for relatively high throughput analysis. Sequencing multiple mutant LacI genes will reveal important information about the mutation spectrum, which in turn may point to possible deficiencies in specific DNA repair pathways or to specific genotoxic events. The LacI transgenic system has been standardized across multiple laboratories19 and the reagents are available commercially. One major disadvantage of the LacI system is the limited ability to detect large deletions or rearrangements; therefore, other methods, e.g. multi-color FISH on metaphase spreads need to be used to compliment this deficiency.

Within the λ phage vector of the LacI mouse model, there is a much smaller gene, CII, available for mutation analysis. Its size and the fact that mutants can be selected makes this a less labor-intensive and cheaper assay20 than the LacI gene analysis. However, the LacI gene is more extensively studied for mutagenesis21 and the sensitivity of the gene to mutations has been well characterized so that there is a clear understanding of the amino acid residues that generate a phenotypic response on a chromogenic substrate22-25.

Other mouse models for mutation detection include the use of the ΦX174 or the LacZ transgenes. The ΦX174 transgenic mouse model, with the original A:T→G:C reversion mutation assay26 or the forward mutation assay27 that allows detection of a spectrum of base pair substitutions, represents a less costly system than the LacI model. However, the mutational screen in the forward assay is not trivial and the mutation spectrum of the ΦX174 transgene is not as well-characterized as that of the LacI. In mouse models carrying LacZ transgenes, the LacZ mutational reporter is recovered utilizing E. coli host cells that are sensitive to galactose and medium containing galactose28. A drawback of this system is that recovery of the LacZ target also involves restriction endonuclease digestion followed by ligation and electroporation of E. coli hosts, thereby making it difficult to adapt the system for small numbers of cells. Although it is not an absolute requirement for working with stem/progenitor cell populations (one can always start with more mice), if large numbers of cells are required (e.g. millions or more) it will quickly become impractical and cost-prohibitive. Also, the relatively large size of LacZ, while providing a sensitive mutational reporter, is cumbersome and more costly for DNA sequence analysis and determination of mutation spectra. A major advantage of this model however, is its ability to detect large deletions and insertions, as well as chromosomal rearrangements.

Since all cells in the LacI, ΦX174 and LacZ transgenic mouse models carry the reporter system, any of these mouse models can be used to measure mutagenesis in any cell type of interest, including stem and progenitor cells, as long as they can be reliably harvested and in sufficient numbers. Because we had extensive experience with the LacI mouse model and the LacI mutation assay, we decided to pursue this system further for mutagenesis analysis in hematopoietic stem and progenitor populations.

The hematopoietic tissue is well-characterized in terms of cell surface phenotype of its individual components, including long-term repopulating stem cells, which are identifiable as the extremely rare population of Lin-IL7R-Sca-1+cKit++(LSK)/ Flk2-CD150+CD48- cells29. Mohrin et al.4 demonstrated that the slightly larger population of LSK/Flk2- cells are still good representatives for HSCs and significantly different from the most primitive committed myeloid progenitor (CMP) population when it comes to studying DNA repair. Moreover, when the HSC-enriched LSK (Flk-2+ and Flk-2-) cells were compared to the Lin-IL7R-Sca-1-cKit++ (LS-K progenitor cells), there was still a significant difference in NHEJ ability5 between the less pure, stem cell-enriched LSK population and the progenitor cells. In our study we use HSC-enriched LSK (Flk-2+ and Flk-2-) cells because we found that at least 2 x 105 cells are required for consistent, reliable results in this mutagenesis assay; this cell number is extremely difficult to obtain when one sorts the LSK/Flk2-CD150+CD48 population or even the LSK/Flk2- population (in terms of mice, costs and practicality). This protocol, based on the one originally developed by Kohler et al.18 describes in detail how the spontaneous DNA mutant frequency can be determined in LSK cells and defined populations of differentiated myeloid cells as well as unseparated bone marrow and spleen cells.

Protokół

Leukocytes from LacI transgenic mice on a C57BL/6 background do not express Sca-1 (Figure 1). Therefore, if Sca-1 is a marker used for cell purification, these mice need to be crossed with an appropriate strain to gain Sca-1 expression; in this protocol the F1 of a cross between regular C57BL/6 (B6) mice and LacI (C57BL/6) transgenic mice (LacI) was used (Figure 1). Of the cell populations used in this protocol, LSKs and CMPs represent the smallest populations in the bone marrow. In order to purify at least 2 x 105 of each/sort, combine the marrow from approximately ten mice when harvesting the marrow from only the hindlegs or from at least four mice when also the hip-, front legs-, vertebral column bones, and sternum are used.

Make single cell suspensions from bone marrow and spleen. A small proportion of the bone marrow is used as is, the majority is used to purify LSKs and differentiated myeloid progenitor cells, i.e. CMPs and granulocytic/monocytic progenitors (GMPs) by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). The isolation of bone marrow cells and FACS-purification of these populations is described elsewhere30-32. Approximately six independent sorts are required to identify significant differences in mutation frequencies between populations.

The following protocol for measuring the spontaneous in vivo mutant frequency in purified hematopoietic subpopulations is adapted from several Stratagene instruction manuals33-35, based on original work from Kohler et al.18 The most critical differences between the existing protocols33-35 and this protocol, required when using relatively small numbers of cells, include differences in volumes of reagents and the times and temperatures used for proteinase K incubation.

1. Sample Storage

After collecting the desired cell populations, aliquot cells in 1-ml centrifuge tubes (for cell number per aliquot, see Table 1). Centrifuge at 266 x g for 7 min, at 4 °C. Aspirate the supernatant carefully. Put the tubes into liquid nitrogen for 5 min and then transfer them to a -80 °C freezer for further use. The samples can be stored for at least 6 months.

2. Isolation of Genomic DNA

  1. Take the samples from the -80 °C freezer. Add 500 μl of ice-cold DNA lysis buffer (Table 3) to the sample tube. Vortex the tubes for 3-5 sec on medium speed and place the tubes on ice for 10 min.
  2. Centrifuge the tubes for 12 min, 4,000 x g, 4 °C. Carefully discard ~450 μl of the supernatant. Spin down the tube for 3-5 sec. Use a glass capillary tube to carefully remove the remainder of the supernatant. Air-dry the inside walls of the tube until no droplets are visible anymore (~2 min).
  3. Add 2 μl of RNace-It ribonuclease cocktail and 10 μl of 1 M DTT to 100 μl of the DNA digestion buffer (Table 3). Adjust the volumes according to the number of samples that will be processed; 20 μl of this DNA digestion solution is required per sample. After adding 20 μl of this to the cell pellet, try to make the pellet detach itself from the bottom, by gently tapping the tube with your finger or a pen.
    Note: it may be difficult to see the pellet because of low cell numbers.
  4. Add 20 μl proteinase K solution* (Table 3) to each sample, very gently tap tube again.
    *Note: the proteinase K solution should be warmed up in a 50 °C water bath, 2 min prior to use in order to activate the enzyme.
  5. Place the tube immediately in a 50 °C water bath. Digest the sample according to the guidelines in Table 1. Tap the tube very gently every 10 min.
    Note: With such small numbers of cells, the temperature of the water bath and the digestion times are absolutely critical for successfully obtaining high quality genomic DNA.
  6. Prepare the DNA dialysis system in the cold room (Figure 2). Pour 600 ml TE buffer (Table 3) into a 600 ml glass beaker, add a small magnetic stir bar so that the buffer can be stirred during dialysis and let the (0.025 mM pore size) membranes float on the surface of the buffer. One membrane per sample; 1-4 membranes can be used in a single dialysis beaker. Make a mark on the margin of the membrane with scissors for identification of each sample.
  7. After the appropriate digestion time, add the now very viscous genomic DNA* carefully to the center of the floating membrane (Figure 2). Cover the beaker immediately with aluminum foil. Dialyze the genomic DNA at 4 °C for ~16-20 hr, stir the buffer gently.
    *Note: When working with viscous DNA solutions, use pipette tips with a wide opening.
  8. The next day pour 600 ml of freshly prepared TE buffer (Table 3) to a clean glass beaker and transfer the membranes to the new beaker with a spoon very carefully, and cover the beaker with foil. Dialyze for another 2 hr.
  9. Remove the dialysis membrane from the beaker with the TE buffer using a spoon and transfer only the most viscous "clump" of the DNA solution to a new, sterile 1 ml tube. Store the sample at 4 °C. Continue the mutagenesis assay the next day or up to 1.5 months later. For the purified populations, wait at least 1 week.

3. Preparation of Trays for the E. coli/Phage Culture (Day 1)

Each tray will contain two different layers; an agar layer at the bottom and an agarose layer at the top that contains X-gal. The E. coli/phage solution will be added to the latter. The number and type of cells isolated will determine how many trays will be required. Consult Table 1 to calculate the number of trays needed and subsequent amounts of solutions for this part of the protocol. The following will generate ~60 trays, which one experienced person can process readily.

  1. Prepare the following media:
    1. for the bottom layer, prepare 6 x 2 L flasks with each containing 1,600 ml ddH2O. Add NZY powder (21 g/L) and agar (15 g/L); mix well.
    2. for the top layer, prepare 4 x 1 L flasks with each containing 800 ml ddH2O. Add NZY powder (21 g/L) and agarose (7.2 g/L); mix well.
    3. for culturing E. coli, add 2.5 g of NZY powder to each of 2 x 250 ml flasks and bring the volume to 100 ml with ddH2O;
    4. for confirmation trays used at step 8, add 8.4 g of NZY powder and 6 g of agar to a 1 L flask and bring the volume to 400 ml with ddH2O.
  2. Cover the opening of the flasks with aluminum foil. Mix well and autoclave them at 121 °C, 15 psi for 30 min.
  3. Remove the flasks (VERY HOT!) from the autoclave. Carefully swirl the flasks to mix the agar and agarose, then place them in a 50 °C water bath. When the water bath has reached 50 °C again, pour from the 2 L flasks (step 3.1.1) ~150 ml of NZY agar in each tray (bottom layer).
  4. Allow the agar to solidify at RT for at least 2 hr, then invert and open the trays. Place the bottom of the trays on the lid, 45° off center (Figure 3) and let dry for 30 min. Close the trays and leave O/N at RT.
  5. Meanwhile, prepare the SCS-8 E. coli culture for the next day. From one of the two 250 ml flasks* (step 3.1.3), take 5 ml NZY broth (Table 3) and transfer to a sterile 14 ml tube. Supplement with 62.5 μl of maltose/MgSO4 solution and add 10 μl of the SCS-8 E. coli glycerol stock. Incubate at 37 °C for 3-4 hr while shaking at 250-300 rpm. Use 15 μl of this culture to inoculate 95 ml of NZY broth (in a 250 ml sidearm flask), culture O/N at 37 °C in a shaking incubator (250-300 rpm).
    *Note: the other 250-ml flask can be used later to adjust the OD of the culture if necessary (step 4.1)
  6. Take the 1 L flask with agar (step 3.1.4), and pour ~6-7 ml of NZY agar in 60 mm dishes (this will be enough for ~50 dishes, needed for step 8). Allow agar to harden (~10 min), then invert and wrap in plastic. These dishes can be kept at 4 °C for up to a month.

4. Preparation of Trays for the E. coli/Phage Culture (Day 2)

  1. Check the O.D. of the SCS-8 E. coli culture (step 3.5) on the spectrophotometer. Adjust the OD600 to 0.6 with NZY broth (Table 3) (step 3.1.3), and place the flask on ice to stop growth and keep on ice until ready for use. This will be used for steps 6.3 and 8.2. This culture can be kept for 5 days at 4 °C.
  2. Air dry all assay trays (poured the day before) for ~5 hr (Figure 3).

5. Packaging of Genomic DNA (Day 2; Continued)

  1. Take the required number of orange Transpack tubes out the -80 °C freezer and place them on dry ice until ready for use; take one orange Transpack tube for each packaging reaction to be performed. Label each tube appropriately. Have the genomic DNA samples (step 2.9) ready on ice.
  2. This step should be performed one tube at the time. Finish the complete step before moving on to the next DNA sample. Thaw one orange tube*note1 quickly: use your fingers until most of it is thawed, then put on ice. Take the corresponding genomic DNA sample and immediately transfer 8-12 μl sample*note 2,3 to the orange tube. Mix the contents by gently pipetting up and down 3x, as well as by gently tapping the tube with your finger. Try not to introduce bubbles when mixing. Place the tube in a 30 °C water bath for 90 min.
    *Note 1: a quick spin in a microcentrifuge may be necessary to collect all contents from the inside walls and the cap.
    *Note 2: volume of added sample depends on the number of cells used to generate that sample: 11-12 μl of samples prepared from 2.0-5.0 x 105 cells; 10 μl of 1.0 x 106 cell-samples, and 8 μl of 1.5 x 106 cell-samples.
    *Note 3: The DNA is still very viscous; to take the DNA out, push the pipet tip to the bottom of the sample tube and carefully twist the tip around against the inner wall of the tube.
  3. Take 1 or 2 blue Transpack tubes* out the -80 °C freezer and place them on dry ice until further use. Thaw them quickly and transfer 12 μl to each of the orange tubes. Mix the solution by gently pipetting it up and down 3 times. Spin the tube down for 2-3 sec, then tap the tube with your finger for further mixing and immediately return it to the 30 °C water bath for another 90 min.
    *Note: Use 1 blue tube for 5-6 reactions and 2 blue tubes for 10-12 reactions.
  4. After 90 min, dilute each reaction with 970 μl SM buffer* (Table 3) to stop the reaction and vortex on medium speed for 5 sec. Put tubes on ice till further use.
    *Note: if the number of cells is ≤ 5 x 105, use 500 μl SM buffer (Table 3) to stop the reaction; 2 tubes (of the same sample) can then be combined later (step 6.4).

6. Plating Packaged Genomic DNA (Day 2; Continued)

  1. Close the inverted agar trays that were opened for drying in the morning. Label the trays for each sample.
  2. Dissolve 4.8 g of X-gal in 16.8 ml of N, N-dimethylformamide (needed for step 6.5). Stir immediately and put on a shaker platform. Protect against light. Solution should be clear in 20-30 min.
  3. Aliquot the SCS-8 E. coli cells. For each set of trays*, use one 50 ml conical tube. Label the tube with the name of the packaged DNA sample. Add 2 ml of E. coli suspension for each tray.
    * Note: For example 3 x 105 GMPs requires a set of 8 trays (see Table 1). Thus, two aliquots, require 8 x 2 = 16 trays. Keep the aliquots separate and thus prepare two 50 ml tubes, with each 8 x 2 = 16 ml E. coli suspension.
  4. Add the 1 ml* of packaged DNA sample (from step 5.4) to the appropriate 50 ml tube containing the SCS-8 E. coli aliquot and mix well. Incubate this E. coli/phage mixture in a shaking incubator (250-300 rpm), at 37 °C for 23 min.
    *Note: If DNA was extracted from ≤ 5 x 105 cells, 500 μl of SM buffer was used to stop the reaction (step 5.4). At this step, the tubes can be combined and added to one 50 ml conical tube.
  5. When the E. coli/phage mixture is incubating, start preparations for the top agarose layer. Add 5 ml of X-gal/N, N-dimethylformamide solution (step 6.2) to each 800 ml flask of top layer agarose solution (from step 3.1.2; kept at 50 °C). Final concentration of X-gal will be 1.5 mg/ml. The X-gal may precipitate a little when added to the agarose. Swirl to dissolve the X-gal and put the bottle back in the 50 °C water bath.
  6. Take the E. coli/phage mixture out of the incubator (step 6.4). Each sample requires multiple trays; each tray, requires 50 ml X-gal/agarose solution (step 6.5). Pour the required volume of X-gal/agarose for each sample (i.e. 50 ml x number of trays) in a larger sterile plastic bottle and add the appropriate E. coli/phage mixture. Swirl the bottle to mix. Divide the mixture in aliquots of 45-50 ml in 50 ml conical tubes. The number of tubes should be the same as the number of trays required for that sample.
    Note: The leftover X-gal/agarose solution will be used in step 8.3. The solution can be stored in a 50 °C water bath until further use.
  7. Pour the 50 ml of top agarose mixture across the bottom half of the assay tray. Quickly spread the agarose by tilting the assay tray slightly in one direction.
    Note: the agarose will cool down very quickly and will become impossible to spread out over the tray. Therefore, this step needs to be performed relatively fast and with agarose that has been kept at 50 °C.
  8. Allow the top agarose to harden for at least 15 min. Then, invert and open the assay trays to let them air-dry for 30 min (Figure 3).
  9. Close the trays, incubate the assay trays inverted (bottom agar layer side on top) at 37 °C for 15-16 hr. Don't stack more than 5 trays.

7. Determination of a Putative Mutant Frequency (Day 3)

  1. Remove the trays from the 37 °C incubator and let them cool down. Count the translucent plaque forming units (PFU) on each tray; randomly select 2 sites on the trays, draw a square* of 2.5 x 2.5 cm2 or 5 x 5 cm2 and count all the PFUs in each square with a marking cell counter (Figure 4A, B).
    *Note: To draw the square use a device as shown in Figure 5. If the number of counted PFUs is ≥40, use the smaller square, otherwise use the larger.
  2. Take the average of the squares counted and multiply by 96 if counting with a smaller square; or multiply this number by 24 if counting with the large one. Add the number of PFUs counted for all trays from the same sample. This is the total number of PFUs generated for that sample.
  3. Next, count the mutant plaques in each tray. The trays have now cooled down, which will help to locate the mutant plaques. To further facilitate spotting the blue plaques, move the tray over a red and/or white surface; sheets of red and white paper work well. Circle any blue plaque with a marker pen. Record the shape and intensity of the blue color of each mutant (e.g. full, circle, sector; Figure 4C)36,37.
  4. Determine the putative mutant frequency for each sample by dividing the number of mutant PFUs (step 7.3) by the total number of PFUs (step 7.2).

8. Verification of Putative Mutant Plaques (Day 3-5)

  1. Using a Pasteur pipette, core each mutant (blue) PFU and transfer the plug into 250 μl sterile SM buffer (Table 3). Add 25 μl of chloroform, vortex for 5 sec and store at 4 °C to continue the next day or leave for 2 hr at RT before continuing with the next step, to verify that the mutant PFU is indeed a mutant. The samples can be stored at 4 °C for at least 1 year.
  2. Label one 1 ml and one 4 ml sterile tube for each mutant that was plugged. In the new 1 ml tube, dilute the resuspended phage released from the agar plug (step 8.1) 1:50 in sterile SM buffer (2 μl of sample into 100 μl SM buffer (Table 3)), vortex briefly, set aside. To the 4 ml sterile tube add 200 μl SCS-8 E. coli culture (from step 4.1) and 2 μl of the diluted phage from the corresponding 1 ml tube, incubate at 37 °C for 5-10 min.
  3. Add 2.5 ml of the top agarose containing X-gal (left-over from step 6.6) to each 4 ml tube, swirl tube to mix and pour onto a 60-mm NZY agar plate previously poured (step 3.6). Leave for 10 min (to let the top agarose solidify), invert the dish and incubate O/N at 37 °C.
  4. The next morning, remove the dish from the incubator and determine the proportion of blue PFUs on each dish (Figure 6). When 70% or more of the PFUs are blue, a mutant is considered confirmed38,39. Core the mutant plaque from the dish and put in a 1.5 ml screw top tube, containing 250 μl SM buffer (Table 3) and 25 μl chloroform; it is now ready for sequencing.
  5. When 50% or less of the PFU is blue, it is not considered a real mutant38,39. When the frequency of blue PFUs is between 60-70%, check back with in the notes about the shape of the plaque; if the shape of the PFU was "full", proceed with sequencing.

9. Sequencing for Mutations in the LacI Gene

  1. Set up PCR reactions in a 25 μl reaction volume, including 1.5 μl of plaque supernatant (template, step 8.4), the forward primer SF1 (5'-GGAAACGCCTGGTATCTT-3') and the reverse primer SR2 (5'-GCCAGTGAATCCGTAATCA-3'). Use the PCR extender Taq polymerase kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cycling conditions are as follows: 94 °C for 2 min, then 35 cycles of 94 °C for 20 sec, 60 °C for 20 sec, 72 °C for 2 min, followed by a final step of 72 °C for 5 min.
  2. Take a 5 μl aliquot of each reaction and run on a 0.8% agarose gel, to confirm amplification.
  3. Clean up the PCR reactions using the Augencourt cleanup kit according to the manufacturer's instructions.
  4. Quantitate Template DNA.
  5. Use ~100 ng of PCR product as template DNA for sequencing. Sequence amplicons in both directions using the same PCR primers as sequencing primers (see above).
  6. Assemble sequences and align with the LacI reference sequence40 to detect mutations.

Wyniki

The in vivo mutagenesis assay measures a rare event (mutant PFUs) among many events (all PFUs). By performing the assay with small number of cells, it is possible that the outcome is considerably influenced by false-positive and false-negative results. To address this issue we performed a serial dilution experiment with unfractionated bone marrow cells, harvested from three different animals. We measured the mutant frequency in the bone marrow of these animals using 1.4 x 106, 7.0 x 105, 3....

Dyskusje

The in vivo mutagenesis assay described herein is based on the LacI transgenic mouse model originally generated by Kohler et al.18 This model utilizes a λ phage vector carrying a lacI reporter gene. The two cos sites flanking the vector allow for a relatively simple recovery and subsequent packaging into infectious phage particles, used to infect E. coli. A blue plaque will be generated by phage-infected E. coli that contain a mutated LacI...

Ujawnienia

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Podziękowania

We would like to thank David R. Rodriguez, M.A. for the graphic design and photography in this manuscript. This work was supported by funding from the GCCRI, the NIH/NIA (5R21AG033339) and the Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA054174) to the UTHSCSA Flow Cytometry Core facility and the UTHSCSA Advanced Nucleic Acids Core Facility.

Materiały

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
LacI transgenic mice BioReliance Corporation
RecoverEase DNA Isolation Kit, including the RNace-It ribonuclease cocktailAgilent Technologies (Stratagene)720202
Transpack Packaging Extract, including the orange and blue transpack tubes and the SCS-8 E. coliAgilent Technologies (Stratagene)200221
DNA size standards – lambda ladderBio Rad170-3635
0.025 mM Pore size membranes Fisher (Millipore)VSWP 025 00
245 mm2 Bioassay dishes (trays) Fisher (Corning)07-200-600
NZY broth (powder)Fisher (Teknova)N1144
AgarFisherBP1423-500
AgaroseFisherE-3120-500
N,N-DimethylformamideFisherAC34843-5000
X-galResearch Products Intl Corp (RPI)B71800-10.0
Proteinase KRoche3-115-852
PCR Extender Taq Polimerase kit5 PRIME2200500
Agencourt AMPure XP cleanup kitBeckman/CoulterA63880

Odniesienia

  1. Maslov, A. Y., Vijg, J. Genome instability, cancer and aging. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1790 (10), 963-969 (2009).
  2. Aguilera, A., Gomez-Gonzalez, B. Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9 (3), 204-217 (2008).
  3. Milyavsky, M., et al. A distinctive DNA damage response in human hematopoietic stem cells reveals an apoptosis-independent role for p53 in self-renewal. Cell. Stem Cell. 7 (2), 186-197 (2010).
  4. Mohrin, M., et al. Hematopoietic stem cell quiescence promotes error-prone DNA repair and mutagenesis. Cell. Stem Cell. 7 (2), 174-185 (2010).
  5. Shao, L., Feng, W., Lee, K. J., Chen, B. P., Zhou, D. A sensitive and quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based cell free in vitro non-homologous end joining assay for hematopoietic stem cells. PLoS ONE. 7 (3), (2012).
  6. Sotiropoulou, P. A., et al. Bcl-2 and accelerated DNA repair mediates resistance of hair follicle bulge stem cells to DNA-damage-induced cell death. Nat. Cell Biol. 12 (6), 572-582 (2010).
  7. Prasher, J. M., et al. Reduced hematopoietic reserves in DNA interstrand crosslink repair-deficient Ercc1-/- mice. EMBO J. 24 (4), 861-871 (2005).
  8. Rossi, D. J., et al. Deficiencies in DNA damage repair limit the function of haematopoietic stem cells with age. Nature. 447 (7145), 725-729 (2007).
  9. Reese, J. S., Liu, L., Gerson, S. L. Repopulating defect of mismatch repair-deficient hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 102 (5), 1626-1633 (2003).
  10. Carney, D. A., et al. Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia following fludarabine combination chemotherapy. Leukemia. 24 (12), 2056-2062 (2010).
  11. Jankowska, A. M., et al. Base excision repair dysfunction in a subgroup of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Leukemia. 22 (3), 551-558 (2008).
  12. Tam, C. S., et al. Treatment-related myelodysplasia following fludarabine combination chemotherapy. Haematologica. 91 (11), 1546-1550 (2006).
  13. Webb, S. Xeroderma pigmentosum. BMJ. 336 (7641), 444-446 (2008).
  14. Ben-Yehuda, D., et al. Microsatellite instability and p53 mutations in therapy-related leukemia suggest mutator phenotype. Blood. 88 (11), 4296-4303 (1996).
  15. Casorelli, I., et al. Drug treatment in the development of mismatch repair defective acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. DNA Repair. 2 (5), 547-559 (2003).
  16. Olipitz, W., et al. Defective DNA-mismatch repair: a potential mediator of leukemogenic susceptibility in therapy-related myelodysplasia and leukemia. Genes Chrom. Cancer. 34 (2), 243-248 (2002).
  17. Haase, D., et al. New insights into the prognostic impact of the karyotype in MDS and correlation with subtypes: evidence from a core dataset of 2124 patients. Blood. 110 (13), 4385-4395 (2007).
  18. Kohler, S. W., et al. Analysis of spontaneous and induced mutations in transgenic mice using a lambda ZAP/lacI shuttle vector. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 18 (4), 316-321 (1991).
  19. Rogers, B. J., Provost, G. S., Young, R. R., Putman, D. L., Short, J. M. Intralaboratory optimization and standardization of mutant screening conditions used for a lambda/lacI transgenic mouse mutagenesis assay. 327 (1-2), 57-66 (1995).
  20. Jakubczak, J. L., et al. Analysis of genetic instability during mammary tumor progression using a novel selection-based assay for in vivo mutations in a bacteriophage lambda transgene target. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93 (17), 9073-9078 (1996).
  21. Ward, T. L., Prtenjaca, A., Hill, K. A. A novel Escherichia coli-derived mutation detected with the Big Blue cII mutant selectable assay. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 51 (4), 344-348 (2010).
  22. Miller, J. H., Coulondre, C., Farabaugh, P. J. Correlation of nonsense sites in the lacI gene with specific codons in the nucleotide sequence. Nature. 274 (5673), 770-775 (1978).
  23. Provost, G. S., et al. Transgenic systems for in vivo mutation analysis. Mutat. Res. 288 (1), 133-149 (1993).
  24. Schaaper, R. M., Danforth, B. N., Glickman, B. W. Mechanisms of spontaneous mutagenesis: an analysis of the spectrum of spontaneous mutation in the Escherichia coli lacI gene. J. Mol. Biol. 189 (2), 273-284 (1986).
  25. Schaaper, R. M., Dunn, R. L. Spontaneous mutation in the Escherichia coli lacI gene. Genetics. 129 (2), 317-326 (1991).
  26. Burkhart, J. G., Burkhart, B. A., Sampson, K. S., Malling, H. V. ENU-induced mutagenesis at a single A: T base pair in transgenic mice containing phi X174. Mutat. Res. 292 (1), 69-81 (1993).
  27. Valentine, C. R., et al. Characterization of mutant spectra generated by a forward mutational assay for gene A of Phi X174 from ENU-treated transgenic mouse embryonic cell line PX-2. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 39 (1), 55-68 (2002).
  28. Gossen, J. A., Molijn, A. C., Douglas, G. R., Vijg, J. Application of galactose-sensitive E. coli strains as selective hosts for LacZ- plasmids. Nucleic Acids Res. 20 (12), 3254 (1992).
  29. Kiel, M. J., et al. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell. 121 (7), 1109-1121 (2005).
  30. Akashi, K., Traver, D., Miyamoto, T., Weissman, I. L. A clonogenic common myeloid progenitor that gives rise to all myeloid lineages. Nature. 404 (6674), 193-197 (2000).
  31. Frascoli, M., Proietti, M., Grassi, F. Phenotypic analysis and isolation of murine hematopoietic stem cells and lineage-committed progenitors. J. Vis. Exp. (65), (2012).
  32. Osawa, M., Hanada, K., Hamada, H., Nakauchi, H. Long-term lymphohematopoietic reconstitution by a single CD34-low/negative hematopoietic stem cell. Science. 273 (5272), 242-245 (1996).
  33. Stratagene, Transpack packaging extract for lambda transgenic shuttle vector recovery. Instruction manual. , (2001).
  34. Stratagene, RecoverEase DNA isolation kit. Instruction manual. , (2009).
  35. Stratagene, Big Blue transgenic mouse mutagenesis assay system. Instruction manual. , (1992).
  36. Nishino, H., Buettner, V. L., Sommer, S. S. Towards validation of the Big Blue transgenic mouse mutagenesis assay: the mutational spectrum of ex vivo pinpoint mutant plaques. Muta. Res. 372 (1), 97-105 (1996).
  37. Stuart, G. R., Gorelick, N. J., Andrews, J. L., de Boer, J. G., Glickman, B. W. The genetic analysis of lacI mutations in sectored plaques from Big Blue transgenic mice. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 28, 385-392 (1996).
  38. Bielas, J. H., Heddle, J. A. Proliferation is necessary for both repair and mutation in transgenic mouse cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 (21), 11391-11396 (2000).
  39. Paashuis-Lew, Y., Zhang, X. B., Heddle, J. A. On the origin of spontaneous somatic mutations and sectored plaques detected in transgenic mice. Mutat. Res. 373 (2), 277-284 (1997).
  40. de Boer, J. G., Glickman, B. W. The lacI gene as a target for mutation in transgenic rodents and Escherichia coli. Genetics. 148 (4), 1441-1451 (1998).
  41. Piegorsch, W. W., et al. Study design and sample sizes for a lacI transgenic mouse mutation assay. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 25 (3), 231-245 (1995).
  42. Yang, L., et al. Identification of Lin(-)Sca1(+)kit(+)CD34(+)Flt3- short-term hematopoietic stem cells capable of rapidly reconstituting and rescuing myeloablated transplant recipients. Blood. 105 (7), 2717-2723 (2005).
  43. Hilbe, J. M. . Negative Binomial Regression. second edn. , (2011).
  44. de Boer, J. G., Provost, S., Gorelick, N., Tindall, K., Glickman, B. W. Spontaneous mutation in lacI transgenic mice: a comparison of tissues. Mutagenesis. 13 (2), 109-114 (1998).
  45. Huffman, M. D. An improved approximation to-sample poisson test. Appl. Stat. 33 (2), 224-226 (1984).

Przedruki i uprawnienia

Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE

Zapytaj o uprawnienia

Przeglądaj więcej artyków

DNA MutationsHematopoietic Stem CellsHematopoietic Progenitor CellsGenomic InstabilityLacI Transgenic MiceIn Vivo Mutagenesis AssayLin IL7R Sca 1 cKit LSK CellsDNA SequencingMutation Frequency

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Prywatność

Warunki Korzystania

Zasady

Badania

Edukacja

O JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone