Zaloguj się

Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.

W tym Artykule

  • Podsumowanie
  • Streszczenie
  • Wprowadzenie
  • Protokół
  • Wyniki
  • Dyskusje
  • Ujawnienia
  • Podziękowania
  • Materiały
  • Odniesienia
  • Przedruki i uprawnienia

Podsumowanie

The present protocol describes a procedure of fish sperm assessment using computer-assisted sperm analysis and cooling devices. The software gives a rapid, accurate and quantitative analysis of fish sperm quality based on spermatozoa motility, which can be a useful tool in aquaculture to improve reproduction success.

Streszczenie

For gamete quality evaluation, there are innovative, rapid, and quantitative techniques that can provide useful data for aquaculture. Computerized systems for sperm analysis were developed to measure several parameters and one of the most commonly measured is the sperm motility.

Initially, this computer technology was designed for mammalian species, although it can also be used for fish sperm analysis. Fish have specific features that can affect sperm assessment such as a short motility time after activation and, in some cases, adaptation to lower temperatures. Thus, it is necessary to modify both software and hardware components to make motility analysis more efficient for fish sperm analysis. For mammalian sperm, the heating plate is used to maintain optimal temperatures of spermatozoa. However, for some fish species, it is advantageous to use a lower temperature to prolong the duration of motility, since the sperm remain active for less than 2 min. Therefore, cooling devices are necessary to refrigerate samples at constant temperature over the time of analysis, including on the optical microscope. This protocol describes the analysis of fish sperm motility using software for sperm analysis and new cooling devices to optimize the results.

Wprowadzenie

The efficacy of reproduction depends on the quality of both gametes (eggs and sperm)1,2. This is the major factor that contributes to successful fertilization, allowing the development of viable offspring3,4. The convenient evaluation of gamete quality is the best tool for defining the fertility potential of a specimen.

Mixing sperm from multiple males is a common practice in the production of many aquatic commercial species4. However, the sperm variability between males can lead to sperm competition and, consequently, not all the males are equally contributing to the gene pool5. In this sense, the correct evaluation of individual ejaculate/spermatozoa features, such as motility, is fundamental to obtain discriminatory information regarding individual male fertility potential. Direct observation of sperm motility can produce inaccurate and subjective data as it requires time and experience, which leads to a lack of consistency and incompatibility of results6,7. However, there are many innovative, rapid and quantitative techniques that can provide a reliable sperm quality analysis2,4.

Computer-assisted sperm analysis was developed to offer accurate data about sperm quality8. This technology includes the development of software associated with a phase contrast microscope that allows the assessment of sperm motility. However, a limiting factor of motility parameter is the frame rate of the video camera. Individual spermatozoa trajectories are based on spermatozoa head centroid position in consecutive frames of video recordings, which is correlated with the flagellar movement patterns3,9,10,11. The main kinetic parameters measured are the straight-line velocity (VSL), curvilinear velocity (VCL) and average path velocity (VAP). VSL is the distance between the start and end-point taken by the spermatozoa divided by time. VCL is the real velocity along the precise trajectory taken by the spermatozoa. VAP is the velocity along a derived smoothed path of trajectory. These parameters allow additional kinetic information, including linearity (LIN), straightness (STR), wobble (WOB) and beating measurements like amplitude of lateral head movement (ALH) and beat-cross frequency (BCF)4,10.

The sperm analysis system was originally used for mammalian species, and one of the requirements for the system is to operate at the body temperature of the donor (about 37 °C). This software could also be used for fish species; although, it is necessary to make some adaptations to reduce the error of sperm analysis results. In some fish species, such as salmonids and eel8,12, fertilization occurs at low temperature (around 4 °C)2,4. Thus, cooling devices should be developed to avoid uncomfortable working conditions. In addition, fish spermatozoa are immotile in seminal fluid and require an osmotic shock to activate motility. For freshwater species, the activator medium should have hypotonic osmolality, while for marine species the medium should be hypertonic. However, for some species, as salmonids, the ion concentration could also be important3,4,9. After activation, fish sperm is characterized by a rapid decrease of motility (less than 2 min)13,14 and high velocity, being vital to determine the optimal frame rate to obtain reliable data15.

The objectives of this study are to design and apply refrigeration systems for fish sperm samples. In addition, this protocol defines how to determine the optimal frame rates for the establishment of standard protocols depending on the species. The use of this protocol opens new doors in the context of fish seminal evaluation, using the European eel as a model.

Protokół

Procedures involving animal subjects have been approved (2015/VSC/PEA/00064) by the General Direction of Agricultural Production and Livestock at the Universitat Politècnica de València.

1. Collect Sperm from Mature European Eels in Captivity

NOTE: Use European eel males maintained in tanks with seawater and a recirculation system at constant temperature (20 °C). Treat with hormones through weekly intraperitoneal injection (human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG); 1.5 IU per g of fish body weight). Acclimatize fish gradually starting with 3 days in freshwater followed by replacement with seawater (1/3 of the total water in the tank) every 2 days until reaching a salinity of 37.0 g/mL.

  1. Anesthetize the eel 24 h after hormone injection to obtain samples with better sperm quality.
    1. Prepare the anaesthesia beforehand: add 300 mg of benzocaine to 100 mL of 70% ethanol. Mix well and store at 4 °C.
    2. Dilute benzocaine in a flexible bucket with 5 L of system water to get a final concentration of 60 mg/L and mix properly.
    3. Transfer the fish to the bucket with system water and benzocaine. Wait a few minutes until the fish calm down.
  2. Clear the genital area with water and dry with absorbent paper to avoid contamination of sperm samples by faeces, urine or seawater.
  3. Apply gentle pressure in the abdominal area and collect the sperm samples into 15 mL plastic tubes using the vacuum pump. Sperm volume up to 6-7 mL, depending on the male.
  4. Keep sperm samples at 4 °C for at least 1 h until motility analysis is carried out.

2. Refrigerate and Dilute the Sperm Samples

  1. Prepare the diluter solution beforehand.
    NOTE: The sperm samples should be diluted in the extender solution specific for each species.
    1. Prepare the non-activator medium for eel sperm samples (P1 medium). Add 0.42 g of sodium bicarbonate, 1.828 g of sodium chloride, 0.127 g of magnesium chloride, 0.56 g of potassium chloride and 0.037 g of calcium chloride to 250 mL of distilled water. Mix well to dissolve. Store at 4 °C.
  2. Set the cooler block at 4 °C to maintain samples at a constant temperature. Wait until the temperature stabilizes.
  3. Dilute the sperm samples using the diluter solution specific for each species.
    NOTE: The dilution ratio is species specific and must be defined to standardize the protocol. First, estimate sperm concentration based on the concentration obtained in the pre-analysis of motility using software, as explained in steps 3 and 4. With this analysis, it is also possible to select the best sperm samples based on the percentage of motility. After this, the researcher can start to collect data for the experiment using the best samples with the correct concentration.
    1. Dilute eel sperm samples in the P1 medium with a ratio of 1:50. To prepare 500 µL of eel diluted sperm, add 50 µL of the fresh sperm sample and 450 µL of P1. Mix well.

3. Evaluate the Sperm Motility Parameters

  1. Set-up the Motility Module of the Software
    1. Set the cooler stage at 4 °C and wait until it stabilizes.
    2. Open the software and select Motility Module. Create username and password if necessary.
    3. Select Properties and choose the desired parameters before starting the sperm analysis.
      1. Click on Species | Fish.
      2. Select the Frames Per Second and Number of Images, depending on the best technical conditions for each species. Set both options at 120 images per second.
      3. Choose negative contrast. It is mandatory for accurate reconstruction of the spermatozoa trajectories16.
      4. Select the corresponding Counting Chamber and Scale of the video camera. Calibrate the video camera for the magnification lens used in the experiment. Set SpermTrack10 as counting chamber and 10X scale.
        NOTE: In general, a depth of 10 µm in the counting chamber and a magnification lens of 10X are the recommended conditions since they provide better focusing of all spermatozoa and capture the highest number of cells. However, it is recommended to make a previous study of the optimal conditions for motility analysis of each species.
      5. Adjust the Particle Area and Connectivity for each species. Set minimum particle area at 2 µm2 and connectivity at 7 µm.
        NOTE: For fish, the minimum value of particles area ranges between 2-5 µm, and connectivity depends on the spermatozoa velocity and the frame rate.
      6. Save the set-up.
    4. Select Capture.
  2. Analyze European Eel Sperm with Software
    1. Prepare the activator solution (artificial seawater) by adding 0.946 g of commercial salt to 25 mL of distilled water with 2% BSA.
    2. Take 500 mL of activator solution (artificial seawater) and place in the cooler block.
      NOTE: In general, fish sperm is activated by an osmotic shock event, although for some species the ion concentration could also be important. For freshwater species, the activator medium should have hypotonic osmolality, while for marine species the medium should be hypertonic.
    3. Put the counting chamber under the cooling stage and wait until the temperature stabilizes to 4 °C.
    4. Mix the activator and diluted sperm to activate spermatozoa and start the motility video recording between 5-10 s after activation.
      1. Take 4 µL of activator solution and place in the counting chamber.
      2. Gently homogenize the diluted sperm by shaking the microcentrifuge 3 times to avoid damage in spermatozoa cells.
      3. Take 0.5 µL of diluted sperm, mix with the activator, and put the cover in the counting chamber quickly.
        NOTE: This step should not take more than 5 s to start the analysis as soon as possible.
      4. Focus on the spermatozoa cells and find the best visual area, which is defined by a low number of spermatozoa (150 to 200 cells) to avoid interception between cells (Supplemental Figure 1A). Select Capture Video to obtain the spermatozoa tracks, which are separated according to speed.
      5. Select Capture to obtain 3 to 7 fields, which are the optimal interval to obtain a lower variability in the results, and proceed as before. Record videos until 120 s post-activation in order to avoid condensation on the cover of the counting chamber.
      6. Select Exit to have a general view of all the fields.

4. Obtain Motility Data

  1. Select Fields | Partial | Save and choose a file name. Click Save.
    NOTE: The spreadsheet provides mean values of partial data, charts and images of spermatozoa tracks.
  2. Select General Data | File Name | Save.
    NOTE: The data provide kinetic values for individual spermatozoa of all fields.

Wyniki

Analysis of the time effect on sperm motility

In the case of the European eel, the percentage of static spermatozoa increased from 15 s to 120 s after activation (from 24.4% to 40.7%), and the percentage of mobile progressive spermatozoa decreased (from 36.9% to 20.9%) (Figure 1A and 1B). Based on speed, spermatozoa cells showed a decrease in velocity over time...

Dyskusje

The sperm analysis software used in this protocol has been used by researchers worldwide for different species, including fish. However, fish have some specific features that can affect the sperm assessment. Fish spermatozoa showed high speed in the moment of activation which declines quickly and leads to a short time of motility after activation. Besides, the temperature of reproduction is species-dependent and, in some cases, could be around 4 °C2,4,<...

Ujawnienia

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Podziękowania

This project has received funding from the COST Association (Food and Agriculture COST Action FA1205: AQUAGAMETE, and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie project IMPRESS (GA No 642893). We would like to thank the scientific team of PROiSER, specifically to the student Alberto Vendrell Bernabéu, for his active participation in the video recording of this project.

Materiały

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Human Chorionic GonadotropinArgent Chemical LaboratorieshCGHormone
BenzocaineMerckE1501 SigmaAnesthesia
sodium bicarbonateMerckS5761 Sigma P1 medium
sodium chlorideMerck1.06406 EMD MilliporeP1 medium
magnesium chlorideMerck1374248 USPP1 medium
potassium chlorideMerckP3911-500GP1 medium
calcium chlorideMerckC7902-500GP1 medium
commercial saltAqua Medic MeersalzActivator solution 
BSAMerck05470 SigmaActivator solution 
Falcon tubes 15 mlMerckT1943-1000EA
Falcon tubes supportMerckR5651-5EA
EppendorfsMerckT9661-1000EA
Micropipet 20 µlGilsonPIPETMAN® Classic
Micropipet 10 µlMerckZ683787-1EA
Tips for micropipets 20 µlMerckZ740030-1000EA
Tips for micropipets 10 µlMerckZ740028-2000EA
SpermtrackPROiSERCounting chamber
TruMorphPROiSERTruMorph
Microscope UB 200i SeriePROiSERMicroscope
Cooler platePROiSERPrototype
Cooler blockPROiSERPrototype
ISAS v1PROiSERISASSoftware

Odniesienia

  1. Kime, D. E., et al. Use of computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) for monitoring the effects of pollution on sperm quality of fish; application to the effects of heavy metals. Aquatic Toxicology. 36, 223-237 (1996).
  2. Kime, D. E., et al. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) as a tool for monitoring sperm quality in fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology. 130, 425-433 (2001).
  3. Bobe, J., Labbé, C. Egg and sperm quality in fish. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 165, 535-548 (2010).
  4. Rurangwa, E., Kime, D. E., Ollevier, F., Nash, J. P. The measurement of sperm motility and factors affecting sperm quality in cultured fish. Aquaculture. 234, 1-28 (2004).
  5. Bekkevold, D., Hansen, M. M., Loeschcke, V. Male reproductive competition in spawning aggregations of cod (Gadus morhua, L.). Molecular Ecology. 11, 91-102 (2002).
  6. Chong, A. P., Walters, C. A., Weinrieb, S. A. The neglected laboratory test: the semen analysis. Journal of Andrology. 4, 280-282 (1983).
  7. Overstreet, J. W., Katz, D. F., Hanson, F. W., Fonesca, J. R. Laboratory tests for human male reproductive risk assessment. Teratogenesis, Carcinogenesis, and Mutagenesis. 4, 67-82 (1984).
  8. Gallego, V., et al. Standardization of European eel (Anguilla anguilla) sperm motility evaluation by CASA software. Theriogenology. 79, 1034-1040 (2013).
  9. Fauvel, C., Suquet, M., Cosson, J. Evaluation of fish sperm quality. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 26, 636-643 (2010).
  10. Mortimer, S. T., Schoëvaërt, D., Swan, M. A., Mortimer, D. Quantitative observations of flagellar motility of capacitating human spermatozoa. Human Reproduction. 12, 1006-1012 (1997).
  11. Bompart, D., et al. CASA-Mot technology: How results are affected by the frame rate and counting chamber. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. , (2018).
  12. Vladić, T., Järvi, T. Sperm motility and fertilization time span in Atlantic salmon and brown trout - the effect of water temperature. Journal of Fish Biology. 50, 1088-1093 (1997).
  13. Rurangwa, E., Volckaert, F. A. M., Huyskens, G., Kime, D. E., Ollevier, F. Quality control of refrigerated and cryopreserved semen using computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA), viable staining and standardizes fertilisation in African catfish (Clarias gariepinus). Theriogenology. 55, 751-769 (2001).
  14. Cosson, J., et al. Marine fish spermatozoa: racing ephemeral swimmers. Reproduction. 136, 277-294 (2008).
  15. Castellini, C., Dal Bosco, A., Ruggeri, S., Collodel, G. What is the best frame rate for evaluation of sperm motility in different species by computer-assisted sperm analysis?. Fertility and Sterility. 96, 24-27 (2011).
  16. Soler, C., et al. A holographic solution for sperm motility analysis in boar samples. Effect of counting chamber depth. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. , (2018).
  17. Elliot, F. I., Sherman, J. K., Elliot, E. J., Sullivan, J. J. A photo method of measuring sperm motility. Journal of Animal Science. 37, 310 (1973).
  18. Katz, D. F., Dott, H. M. Methods of measuring swimming speed of spermatozoa. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 45, 263-272 (1975).
  19. Liu, Y. T., Warme, P. K. Computerized evaluation of sperm cell motility. Computers and Biomedical Research. 10, 127-138 (1977).
  20. Jecht, E. W., Russo, J. J. A system for the quantitative analysis of human sperm motility. Andrologia. 5, 215-221 (1973).
  21. Holt, W. V., Palomo, M. J. Optimization of a continuous real-time computerized semen analysis system for ram sperm motility assessment, and evaluation of four methods of semen preparation. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 8, 219-230 (1996).
  22. Stephens, D. T., Hickman, R., Hoskins, D. D. Description, validation, and performance characteristics of a new computer-automated sperm motility analysis system. Biology of Reproduction. 38, 577-586 (1988).
  23. Mortimer, D., Goel, N., Shu, M. A. Evaluation of the CellSoft automated semen analysis system in a routine laboratory setting. Fertility and Sterility. 50, 960-968 (1988).
  24. Mortimer, S. T., Swan, M. A. Kinematics of capacitating human spermatozoa analysed at 60 Hz. Human Reproduction. 10, 873-879 (1995).
  25. Holt, W. V., O'Brien, J., Abaigar, T. Applications and interpretation of computer-assisted sperm analyses and sperm sorting methods in assisted breeding and comparative research. Reproduction, Fertility and Development. 19, 709-718 (2007).
  26. Gill, H. Y., Van Arsdalen, K., Hypolote, J., Levin, R., Ruzich, J. Comparative study of two computerized semen motility analyzers. Andrologia. 20, 433-440 (1988).
  27. Jasko, D. J., Lein, D. H., Foote, R. H. A comparison of two computer-assisted semen analysis instruments for the evaluation of sperm motion characteristics in the stallion. Journal of Andrology. 11, 453-459 (1990).
  28. Vantman, D., Koukoulis, G., Dennison, L., Zinaman, M., Sherins, R. Computer-assisted semen analysis: Evaluation of method and assessment of the influence of sperm concentration on linear velocity determination. Fertility and Sterility. 49, 510-515 (1988).
  29. Kime, D. E., et al. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) as a tool for monitoring sperm quality in fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology - Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology. 130, 425-433 (2001).
  30. Scherr, T., et al. Microfluidics and numerical simulation as methods for standardization of zebrafish sperm cell activation. Biomedical Microdevices. 17, 65-75 (2015).
  31. Mortimer, S. T., Swan, M. A. Effect of image sampling frequency on established and smoothing-independent kinematic values of capacitating human spermatozoa. Human Reproduction. 14, 997-1004 (1999).
  32. Hoogewijs, M. K., et al. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis. Equine Veterinary Journal. 44, 542-549 (2012).
  33. Soler, C., et al. Effect of counting chamber on seminal parameters, analyzing with the ISASv1®. Revista Internacional de Andrología. 10, 132-138 (2012).
  34. Didion, B. A. Computer-assisted semen analysis and its utility for profiling boar semen samples. Theriogenology. 70, 1374-1376 (2008).
  35. David, G., Serres, C., Jouannet, P. Kinematics of human spermatozoa. Gamete Research. 4, 83-95 (1981).
  36. Björndahl, L. What is normal semen quality? On the use and abuse of reference limits for the interpretation of semen results. Human Fertility (Cambridge). 14, 179-186 (2011).
  37. Verstegen, J., Iguer-ouada, M., Onclin, K. Computer-assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology. 57, 149-179 (2002).
  38. Alavia, S. M. H., Cosson, J. Sperm motility in fishes. I. Effects of temperature and pH: a review. Cell Biology International. 29, 101-110 (2005).
  39. Islam, M. S., Akhter, T. Tale of Fish Sperm and Factors Affecting Sperm Motility: A Review. Advancements in Life Sciences. 1, 11-19 (2011).
  40. Dadras, H., et al. Analysis of common carp Cyprinus carpio sperm motility and lipid composition using different in vitro temperatures. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 180, 37-43 (2017).
  41. Soler, C., García, A., Contell, J., Segervall, J., Sancho, M. Kinematics and subpopulations' structure definition of blue fox (Alopex lagopus) sperm motility using the ISASV1 CASA system. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 49, 560-567 (2014).
  42. Vásquez, F., Soler, C., Camps, P., Valverde, A., GarcíaMolina, A. Spermiogram and sperm head morphometry assessed by multivariate cluster analysis results during adolescence (12-18 years) and the effect of varicocele. Asian Journal of Andrology. 18, 824-830 (2016).
  43. Soler, C., et al. Dog sperm head morphometry: its diversity and evolution. Asian Journal of Andrology. 19, 149-153 (2017).
  44. Valverde, A., et al. Morphometry and subpopulation structure of Holstein bull spermatozoa: variations in ejaculates and cryopreservation straws. Asian Journal of Andrology. 18, 851-857 (2016).

Przedruki i uprawnienia

Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE

Zapytaj o uprawnienia

Przeglądaj więcej artyków

Keywords Fish SpermSperm QualityCASA TechnologyMotility AnalysisCooling DevicesArtificial FertilizationEuropean EelSperm Sample CollectionSperm DilutionSperm ActivationCooler BlockCASA Software Configuration

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Prywatność

Warunki Korzystania

Zasady

Badania

Edukacja

O JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone