Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
Here, we demonstrate a unique, relatively low-temperature, molten-salt synthesis method for preparing uniform complex metal oxide lanthanum hafnate nanoparticles.
The development of feasible synthesis methods is critical for the successful exploration of novel properties and potential applications of nanomaterials. Here, we introduce the molten-salt synthesis (MSS) method for making metal oxide nanomaterials. Advantages over other methods include its simplicity, greenness, reliability, scalability, and generalizability. Using pyrochlore lanthanum hafnium oxide (La2Hf2O7) as a representative, we describe the MSS protocol for the successful synthesis of complex metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs). Furthermore, this method has the unique ability to produce NPs with different material features by changing various synthesis parameters such as pH, temperature, duration, and post-annealing. By fine-tuning these parameters, we are able to synthesize highly uniform, non-agglomerated, and highly crystalline NPs. As a specific example, we vary the particle size of the La2Hf2O7 NPs by changing the concentration of the ammonium hydroxide solution used in the MSS process, which allows us to further explore the effect of particle size on various properties. It is expected that the MSS method will become a more popular synthesis method for nanomaterials and more widely employed in the nanoscience and nanotechnology community in the upcoming years.
Molten-salt synthesis (MSS) involves the use of a molten salt as the reaction medium for preparing nanomaterials from their constituent precursors. The molten salt acts as the solvent and facilitates the enhanced reaction rate by increasing the contact area between reactants and their mobility. The choice of molten salts is of paramount importance for the success of the MSS method. The salt must meet some important quality requirements such as low melting point, compatibility with reacting species, and optimum aqueous solubility. Molten salt has been used previously to enhance the rate of solid-state reactions; however, in a flux system, only a small amount of molten salt is used (unlike in MSS, in which a large quantity is added to form a soluble medium for the reaction and control the properties of the synthesized nanomaterials, such as particle size, shape, and crystallinity, etc.). In this sense, MSS is a modification of the powder metallurgical method and different from the flux method1,2,3. The employment of molten salt can (1) increase reaction kinetic rate4 while decreasing synthesis temperature5, (2) increase the degree of reactant homogeneity6, (3) control crystalline size and morphology7, and (4) reduce the level of agglomeration.
Nanomaterials have been in high demand in scientific research and novel industrial applications because of their superior electrical, chemical, magnetic, optical, electronic, and thermal properties. Their properties are highly dependent on the particle size, shape, and crystallinity. Compared with other synthesis methods for nanomaterials, MSS has several obvious advantages; although, it is not yet as well-known as other synthesis methods in the nanoscience and nanotechnology community. As described below, these advantages include its simplicity, reliability, scalability, generalizability, environmental friendliness, cost effectiveness, relative low synthesis temperature, and free agglomeration of NPs with clean surface8.
Simplicity: The MSS process can be easily carried out in a simple laboratory with basic facilities. No sophisticated instrumentation is needed. Precursors and molten salts are air stable with no need for glove box handling.
Reliability: Once all initial synthesis parameters such as concentration, pH, processing time, and annealing temperature are optimized, high-quality and pure products are assured when using the MSS method. If all synthesis steps are carried out properly, the final products may attain all basic criteria needed for good-quality NPs. A novice to the MSS method will not change the synthesis outcome, as long as all synthesis parameters are properly and carefully followed.
Scalability: The MSS method's ability to produce large quantities of size- and shape-controlled particles is crucial. This critical factor is important because it allows for the determination of industrial usefulness and efficiency. Compared to other synthesis techniques, MSS can easily generate a sufficient amount of products by adjusting stoichiometric amounts during the process. This is an important feature of the method because it allows for convenience at the industrial level, making it a more desired approach due to this scalability9,10.
Generalizability: The MSS method is also a generalizable technique to produce nanoparticles with various compositions. Other than simple metal oxides and some fluorides, nanomaterials of complex metal oxides that have been successfully synthesized by the MSS method include perovskites (ABO3)10,11,12,13,14, spinel (AB2O4)15,16, pyrochlore (A2B2O7)4,17,18,19, and orthorhombic structures (A2B4O9)2,3,20. More specifically, these nanomaterials include ferrites, titanates, niobates, mullite, aluminium borate, wollastonite, and carbonated apatite7,9,21. The MSS method has also been used to produce nanomaterials of various morphologies such as nanospheres4, ceramics powder bodies22, nanoflakes23, nanoplates7, nanorods24, and core-shell nanoparticles (NPs)25, depending on synthesis conditions and crystal structure of the products.
Environmental friendliness: Several traditional methods for making nanomaterials involve the use of large amounts of organic solvents and toxic agents that generate environmental issues. The partial or total elimination of the use of them and the generation of waste by sustainable processes is in demand of green chemistry nowadays8. The MSS method is an environmentally friendly approach to synthesize nanomaterials by employing nontoxic chemical and renewable materials and minimizing waste, byproducts, and energy.
Relative low synthesis temperature: The processing temperature of the MSS method is relatively low compared to that required in a conventional solid-state reaction26 or a sol-gel combustion reaction27. This lower temperature saves energy while producing high-quality NPs.
Cost effectiveness: The MSS method does not require any harsh or costly reactants or solvents nor any specialized instrumentation. Water is the main solvent used for washing away the used molten salts, which are also cheap. Moreover, experimental setup needed includes only simple glassware and a furnace without specialized instrumentation, while nanomaterials with complex composition and refractory nature can be produced.
Agglomeration free with clean surface: During the MSS process, the formed nanoparticles are well-dispersed in the molten salt medium due to its large quantity, used along with its high ionic strength and viscosity1,6,8. Unlike colloidal synthesis and most hydrothermal/solvothermal processes, no protective surface layer is necessary to prevent the continuous growth and agglomeration of the formed NPs.
Exemplary synthesis of complex metal oxide NPs by the MSS method: The MSS method as a universal and cost-effective approach to rationally and large-scale synthesize nanomaterials for a sufficiently wide spectrum of material may be highly welcomed by scientists working in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Here, lanthanum hafnate (La2Hf2O7) was selected because of its multifunctional applications in the areas of X-ray imaging, high k-dielectric, luminescence, thermographic phosphor, thermal barrier coating, and nuclear waste host. La2Hf2O7 is also a good host for doped scintillators due to its high density, large effective atomic number, and the possibility of its crystal structure to be engineered along with an order-disorder phase transition. It belongs to the A2B2O7 family of compounds, in which "A" is a rare-earth element with a +3 oxidation state, and "B" represents a transition metallic element with a +4 oxidation state. However, due to the refractory nature and complex chemical composition, there has been a lack of proper low-temperature and large-scale synthesis methods for La2Hf2O7 NPs.
For fundamental scientific investigation and advanced technological applications, it is a prerequisite to make monodisperse, high-quality, and uniform A2B2O7 NPs. Here we use the synthesis of highly crystalline La2Hf2O7 NPs as an example to demonstrate the advantages of the MSS method. As schematically shown in Figure 1, La2Hf2O7 NPs were prepared by the MSS method with a two-step process following our previous reports. First, a single-source complex precursor of La(OH)3·HfO(OH)2·nH2O was prepared via a coprecipitation route. In the second step, size-controllable La2Hf2O7 NPs were synthesized through the facile MSS process using the single-source complex precursor and nitrate mixture (NaNO3:KNO3 = 1:1, molar ratio) at 650 °C for 6 h.
Figure 1: Schematic of the synthesis steps for La2Hf2O7 NPs via the MSS method. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
1. Preparation of Single-Source Complex Precursor via a Coprecipitation Route
2. Molten-Salt Synthesis of Lanthanum Hafnate NPs
The as-synthesized La2Hf2O7 NPs may exist in the ordered pyrochlore phase. However, chemical doping, pressure, and temperature could modify the phase to defect fluorite. It is possible for our material to have multiple phases; however, here we focus only on the pyrochlore phase for simplicity. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy have been used to systematically characterize their phase purity, structure, and phase. The crystalline size can ...
The chart in Figure 4 provides several reliable controlling factors of the MSS method and accounts for alternative pathways to fine-tune the features of synthesized nanomaterials. In addition, it helps identify critical steps in the MSS process.
Figure 4: Flowchart of the critical steps of MSS indi...
There are no conflicts to declare.
The authors thank the financial support provided by the National Science Foundation under CHE (award #1710160) and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (award #2015-38422-24059). The Department of Chemistry at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley is grateful for the generous support provided by a Departmental Grant from the Robert A. Welch Foundation (Grant No. BX-0048). S.K.G. would like to thank the United States-India Education Foundation (USIEF) and the Institute of International Education (IIE) for his Fulbright Nehru Postdoctoral Fellowship (award #2268/FNPDR/2017).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Acetone, ACS, 99.5+% | Alfa Aesar | 67-64-1 | Dried over 4A sieves |
Hafnium dichloride oxide octahydrate, 98+% (metals basis excluding Zr), Zr <1.5% | Alfa Aesar | 14456-34-9 | Hygroscopic |
Lanthanum(III) nitrate hexahydrate | Aldrich | 10277-43-7 | Hygroscopic |
Potassium nitrate, ReagentPlus R, ≥99.0% | Sigma-Aldrich | 7757-79-1 | Hygroscopic |
Sodium nitrate, ReagentPlus R, ≥99.0% | Sigma-Aldrich | 7631-99-4 | |
Ammonium hydroxide, 28% NH3, NH4OH | Alfa Aesar | 1336-21-6 | |
Filter paper, P8 grade | Fisherbrand |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone