Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
This protocol describes the extraction and visualization of aggregated and soluble proteins from Escherichia coli after treatment with a proteotoxic antimicrobial. Following this procedure allows a qualitative comparison of protein aggregate formation in vivo in different bacterial strains and/or between treatments.
The exposure of living organisms to environmental and cellular stresses often causes disruptions in protein homeostasis and can result in protein aggregation. The accumulation of protein aggregates in bacterial cells can lead to significant alterations in the cellular phenotypic behavior, including a reduction in growth rates, stress resistance, and virulence. Several experimental procedures exist for the examination of these stressor-mediated phenotypes. This paper describes an optimized assay for the extraction and visualization of aggregated and soluble proteins from different Escherichia coli strains after treatment with a silver-ruthenium-containing antimicrobial. This compound is known to generate reactive oxygen species and causes widespread protein aggregation.
The method combines a centrifugation-based separation of protein aggregates and soluble proteins from treated and untreated cells with subsequent separation and visualization by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Coomassie staining. This approach is simple, fast, and allows a qualitative comparison of protein aggregate formation in different E. coli strains. The methodology has a wide range of applications, including the possibility to investigate the impact of other proteotoxic antimicrobials on in vivo protein aggregation in a wide range of bacteria. Moreover, the protocol can be used to identify genes that contribute to increased resistance to proteotoxic substances. Gel bands can be used for the subsequent identification of proteins that are particularly prone to aggregation.
Bacteria are inevitably exposed to a myriad of environmental stresses, including low pH (e.g., in the mammalian stomach)1,2, reactive oxygen and chlorine species (ROS/RCS) (e.g., during oxidative burst in phagocytes)3,4,5, elevated temperatures (e.g., in hot springs or during heat-shock)6,7, and several potent antimicrobials (e.g., AGXX used in this protocol)8. Proteins are particularly vulnerable to any of these stressors, and exposure can provoke protein un-/misfolding that then seeds aggregation. All organisms employ protective systems that allow them to cope with protein misfolding9. However, severe stress can overwhelm the protein quality control machinery and disrupt the secondary and/or tertiary structure of proteins, which ultimately inactivates proteins. As a consequence, protein aggregates can severely impair critical cellular functions required for bacterial growth and survival, stress resistance, and virulence10. Therefore, research focusing on protein aggregation and its consequences in bacteria is a relevant topic due to its potential impact on infectious disease control.
Heat-induced protein unfolding and aggregation are often reversible7. In contrast, other proteotoxic stresses, such as oxidative stress, can cause irreversible protein modifications through the oxidation of specific amino acid side chains resulting in protein un-/misfolding and, eventually, protein aggregation4. Stress-induced formation of insoluble protein aggregates has been extensively studied in the context of molecular chaperones and their protective functions in yeast and bacteria11,12,13. Several protocols have been published that utilize a variety of biochemical techniques for the isolation and analysis of insoluble protein aggregates14,15,16,17. The existing protocols have mainly been used to study bacterial protein aggregation upon heat-shock and/or identification of molecular chaperones. While these protocols have certainly been an advancement to the field, there are some major inconveniences in the experimental procedures because they require (i) a large bacterial culture volume of up to 10 L14,17, (ii) complicated physical disruption processes, including the use of cell disruptors, French press, and/or sonication14,15,17, or (iii) time-consuming repeated washing and incubation steps15,16,17.
This paper describes a modified protocol that aims to address the limitations of the previous approaches and allows the analysis of the amount of protein aggregates formed in two different Escherichia coli strains after treatment with a proteotoxic antimicrobial surface coating. The coating is composed of metal-silver (Ag) and ruthenium (Ru)-conditioned with ascorbic acid, and its antimicrobial activity is achieved by the generation of reactive oxygen species8,18. Herein is a detailed description of the preparation of the bacterial culture after treatment with the antimicrobial compound and a comparison of protein aggregation status upon exposure of two E. coli strains with distinct susceptibility profiles to increasing concentration of the antimicrobial. The described method is inexpensive, fast, and reproducible and can be used to study protein aggregation in the presence of other proteotoxic compounds. In addition, the protocol can be modified to analyze the impact that specific gene deletions have on protein aggregation in a variety of different bacteria.
1. Stress treatment of E. coli strains MG1655 and CFT073
Figure 1: Escherichia coli stress treatment. Bacterial cultures are grown in MOPS-g and treated with the indicated concentrations of the silver-ruthenium-containing antimicrobial when the mid-log phase is reached. Abbreviations: LB = lysogeny broth; Ag-Ru = silver-ruthenium; MOPS-g = 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS)-glucose. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
2. Collecting bacterial cell samples
Figure 2: Bacterial sample collection. Cell samples are harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in lysis buffer followed by storage at -80 °C. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. Extracting the insoluble protein aggregates
Figure 3: Extraction of insoluble protein aggregates. The extraction of protein aggregates involves a series of steps including cell disruption, the separation of protein aggregates from soluble proteins, the solubilization of membrane proteins, and washing. Abbreviation: SDS = sodium dodecyl sulfate. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
4. Soluble protein sample preparation
Figure 4: Preparation of soluble proteins. The preparation of soluble protein involves a precipitation step with trichloroacetic acid and repeated washing with ice-cold acetone. Abbreviations: TCA = trichloroacetic acid; SDS = sodium dodecyl sulfate. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
5. Separation and visualization of extracted protein aggregates using SDS-PAGE
Figure 5: Protein separation and visualization. The samples are separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie staining. Abbreviation: SDS-PAGE = sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Representative results of antimicrobial-induced protein aggregation in commensal Escherichia coli strain MG1655 and UPEC strain CFT073. E. coli strains MG1655 and CFT073 were grown at 37 °C and 300 rpm to OD600= 0.5-0.55 in MOPS-g media before they were treated with the indicated concentrations (-, 0 mg/mL; +, ...
This protocol describes an optimized methodology for the analysis of protein aggregate formation after treatment of different E. coli strains with a proteotoxic antimicrobial. The protocol allows the simultaneous extraction of insoluble and soluble protein fractions from treated and untreated E. coli cells. Compared to existing protocols for protein aggregate isolation from cells14,15,16,
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by Illinois State University School of Biological Sciences startup funds, Illinois State University New Faculty Initiative Grant, and the NIAID grant R15AI164585 (to J.-U. D.). G.M.A. was supported by the Illinois State University Undergraduate Research Support Program (to G.M.A.). K. P. H. was supported by a RISE fellowship provided by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). The authors thank Dr. Uwe Landau and Dr. Carsten Meyer from Largentech Vertriebs GmbH for providing the AGXX powder. Figures 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, and Figure 5 were generated with Biorender.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Chemicals/Reagents | |||
Acetone | Fisher Scientific | 67-64-1 | |
30% Acrylamide/Bisacrylamide solution 29:1 | Bio-Rad | 1610156 | |
Ammonium persulfate | Millipore Sigma | A3678-100G | |
Benzonase nuclease | Sigma | E1014-5KU | |
Bluestain 2 Protein ladder, 5-245 kDa | GoldBio | P008-500 | |
β-mercaptoethanol | Millipore Sigma | M6250-100ML | |
Bromophenol blue | GoldBio | B-092-25 | |
Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 | MP Biomedicals LLC | 821616 | |
D-Glucose | Millipore Sigma | G8270-1KG | |
D-Sucrose | Acros Organics | 57-50-1 | |
Ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) | Sigma-Aldrich | SLBT9686 | |
Glacial Acetic acid | Millipore Sigma | ARK2183-1L | |
Glycerol, 99% | Sigma-Aldrich | G5516-1L | |
Glycine | GoldBio | G-630-1 | |
Hydrochloric acid, ACS reagent | Sigma-Aldrich | 320331-2.5L | |
Isopropanol (2-Propanol) | Sigma | 402893-2.5L | |
LB broth (Miller) | Millipore Sigma | L3522-1KG | |
LB broth with agar (Miller) | Millipore Sigma | L2897-1KG | |
Lysozyme | GoldBio | L-040-25 | |
10x MOPS Buffer | Teknova | M2101 | |
Nonidet P-40 | Thomas Scientific | 9036-19-5 | |
Potassium phosphate, dibasic | Sigma-Aldrich | P3786-1KG | |
Potassium phosphate, monobasic | Acros Organics | 7778-77-0 | |
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) | Sigma-Aldrich | L3771-500G | |
Tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) | Millipore Sigma | T9281-50ML | |
Thiamine | Sigma-Aldrich | T4625-100G | |
100% Trichloroacetic acid | Millipore Sigma | T6399-100G | |
Tris base | GoldBio | T-400-1 | |
Material/Equipment | |||
Centrifuge tubes (15 mL) | Alkali Scientific | JABG-1019 | |
Erlenmeyer flask (125 mL) | Carolina | 726686 | |
Erlenmeyer flask (500 mL) | Carolina | 726694 | |
Freezer: -80 °C | Fisher Scientific | ||
Glass beads (0.5 mm) | BioSpec Products | 1107-9105 | |
Microcentrifuge | Hermle | Z216MK | |
Microcentriguge tubes (1.7 mL) | VWR International | 87003-294 | |
Microcentriguge tubes (2.0 mL) | Axygen Maxiclear Microtubes | MCT-200-C | |
Plastic cuvettes | Fischer Scientific | 14-377-012 | |
Power supply | ThermoFisher Scientific | EC105 | |
Rocker | Alkali Scientific | RS7235 | |
Shaking incubator (37 °C) | Benchmark Scientific | ||
Small glass plate | Bio-Rad | 1653311 | |
Spacer plates (1 mm) | Bio-Rad | 1653308 | |
Spectrophotometer | Thermoscientific | 3339053 | |
Tabletop centrifuge for 15 mL centrifuge tubes | Beckman-Coulter | ||
Vertical gel electrophoresis chamber | Bio-Rad | 1658004 | |
Vortexer | Fisher Vortex Genie 2 | 12-812 | |
Thermomixer | Benchmark Scientific | H5000-HC | |
10 well comb | Bio-Rad | 1653359 |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone