Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
We illustrate the methods involved in screening and identification of the biosurfactant producing microbes. Methods for chromatographic characterization and chemical identification of the biosurfactants, determining the industrial applicability of the biosurfactant in enhancing residual oil recovery are also presented.
Biosurfactants are surface-active compounds capable of reducing the surface tension between two phases of different polarities. Biosurfactants have been emerging as promising alternatives to chemical surfactants due to less toxicity, high biodegradability, environmental compatibility and tolerance to extreme environmental conditions. Here, we illustrate the methods used for screening of microbes capable of producing biosurfactants. The biosurfactant producing microbes were identified using drop collapse, oil spreading, and emulsion index assays. Biosurfactant production was validated by determining the reduction in surface tension of the media due to growth of the microbial members. We also describe the methods involved in characterization and identification of biosurfactants. Thin layer chromatography of the extracted biosurfactant followed by differential staining of the plates was performed to determine the nature of the biosurfactant. LCMS, 1H NMR, and FT-IR were used to chemically identify the biosurfactant. We further illustrate the methods to evaluate the application of the combination of produced biosurfactants for enhancing residual oil recovery in a simulated sand pack column.
Biosurfactants are the amphipathic surface-active molecules produced by microorganisms that have the capacity to reduce the surface and the interfacial tension between two phases1. A typical biosurfactant contains a hydrophilic part that is usually composed of a sugar moiety or a peptide chain or hydrophilic amino acid and a hydrophobic part that is made up of a saturated or unsaturated fatty acid chain2. Due to their amphipathic nature, biosurfactants assemble at the interface between the two phases and reduce the interfacial tension at the boundary, which facilitates the dispersion of one phase into the other1,3. Various types of biosurfactants that have been reported so far include glycolipids in which carbohydrates are linked to long chain aliphatic or hydroxy-aliphatic acids via ester bonds (e.g., rhamnolipids, trehalolipids and sophorolipids), lipopeptides in which lipids are attached to polypeptide chains (e.g., surfactin and lichenysin), and polymeric biosurfactants that are usually composed of polysaccharide- protein complexes (e.g., emulsan, liposan, alasan and lipomannan)4. Other types of biosurfactants produced by the microorganisms include fatty acids, phospholipids, neutral lipids, and particulate biosurfactants5. The most studied class of biosurfactants is glycolipids and among them most of the studies have been reported on rhamnolipids6. Rhamnolipids contain one or two molecules of rhamnose (which form the hydrophilic part) linked to one or two molecules of long chain fatty acid (usually hydroxy-decanoic acid). Rhamnolipids are primary glycolipids reported first from Pseudomonas aeruginosa7.
Biosurfactants have been gaining increasing focus as compared to their chemical counterparts due to various unique and distinctive properties that they offer8. These include higher specificity, lower toxicity, greater diversity, ease of preparation, higher biodegradability, better foaming, environmental compatibility and activity under extreme conditions9. Structural diversity of the biosurfactants (Figure S1) is another advantage that gives them an edge over the chemical counterparts10. They are generally more effective and efficient at lower concentrations as their critical micelle concentration (CMC) is usually several times lower than chemical surfactants11. They have been reported to be highly thermostable (up to 100 °C) and can tolerate higher pH (up to 9) and high salt concentrations (up to 50 g/L)12 thereby offer several advantages in industrial processes, which require exposure to extreme conditions13. Biodegradability and lower toxicity make them suitable for environmental applications such as bioremediation. Because of the advantages that they offer, they have been getting increased attention in various industries like food, agricultural, detergent, cosmetic and petroleum industry11. Biosurfactants have also gained a lot of attention in oil remediation for removal of petroleum contaminants and toxic pollutants14.
Here we report the production, characterization, and application of biosurfactants produced by Rhodococcus sp. IITD102, Lysinibacillus sp. IITD104, and Paenibacillus sp. IITD108. The steps involved in screening, characterization, and application of a combination of biosurfactants for enhanced oil recovery are outlined in Figure 1.
Figure 1: A method for enhanced oil recovery using a combination of Biosurfactants. The stepwise work flow is shown. The work was carried out in four steps. First the microbial strains were cultured and screened for the production of biosurfactant by various assays, which included drop collapse assay, oil spreading assay, emulsion index assay, and surface tension measurement. Then, the biosurfactants were extracted from the cell-free broth and their nature was identified using thin layer chromatography and they were further identified using LCMS, NMR, and FT-IR. In the next step, the extracted biosurfactants were mixed together and the potential of the resulting mixture for enhanced oil recovery was determined using the sand pack column technique. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Screening of these microbial strains to produce biosurfactants was done by drop collapse, oil spreading, emulsion index assay and determination of reduction in the surface tension of the cell-free medium due to growth of the microbes. The biosurfactants were extracted, characterized, and chemically identified by LCMS, 1H NMR, and FT-IR. Finally, a mixture of biosurfactants produced by these microbes was prepared and was used to recover the residual oil in a simulated sand pack column.
The present study only illustrates the methods involved in screening, identification, structural characterization, and application of the biosurfactant combination on enhancing residual oil recovery. It does not provide a detailed functional characterization of the biosurfactants produced by the microbial strains15,16. Various experiments such as critical micelle determination, thermogravimetric analysis, surface wettability, and biodegradability are performed for detailed functional characterization of any biosurfactant. But since this paper is a methods paper, the focus is on screening, identification, structural characterization, and application of the biosurfactant combination on enhancing residual oil recovery; these experiments have not been included in this study.
1. Growth of microbial strains
2. Screening assays for biosurfactant production
NOTE: In the following sections, commercial surfactant (Saponin) was used as a positive control while water and uninoculated media were used as a negative control.
3. Biosurfactant extraction
4. Emulsion stability studies
5. Determining the nature of the biosurfactant
6. Chemical identification of the biosurfactant
7. Biosurfactant application (enhanced oil recovery)
NOTE: In this experiment, double distilled water was used as a negative control and 10% SDS, 10% Tween 80, and 10% commercial saponin were used as positive controls.
Three bacterial strains (Rhodococcus sp. IITD102, Lysinibacillus sp. IITD104, and Paenibacillus sp. IITD108) were screened for the production of biosurfactants by various assays, which included drop collapse assay, oil displacement assay, emulsion index assay, and surface tension reduction. Cell-free supernatants of all the three bacterial strains and a solution of chemical surfactant resulted in a drop collapse and, therefore, were scored positive for the presence of the biosurfactants (
Biosurfactants are one of the most versatile group of biologically active components that are becoming attractive alternatives to chemical surfactants. They have a wide range of applications in numerous industries such as detergents, paints, cosmetics, food, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, petroleum, and water treatment due to their better wettability, lower CMC, diversified structure, and environmental friendliness18. This has led to an increased interest in discovering more microbial strains capab...
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The authors would like to thank the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, for financial support.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
1 ml pipette | Eppendorf, Germany | G54412G | |
1H NMR | Bruker Avance AV-III type spectrometer,USA | ||
20 ul pipette | Thermo scientific, USA | H69820 | |
Autoclave | JAISBO, India | Ser no 5923 | Jain Scientific |
Blue flame burner | Rocker scientific, Taiwan | dragon 200 | |
Butanol | GLR inovations, India | GLR09.022930 | |
C18 column | Agilent Technologies, USA | 770995-902 | |
Centrifuge | Eppendorf, Germany | 5810R | |
Chloroform | Merck, India | 1.94506.2521 | |
Chloroform-d | SRL, India | 57034 | |
Falcon tubes | Tarsons, India | 546041 | Radiation sterilized polypropylene |
FT-IR | Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA | Nicolet iS50 | |
Fume hood | Khera, India | 47408 | Customied |
glacial acetic acid | Merck, India | 1.93002 | |
Glass beads | Merck, India | 104014 | |
Glass slides | Polar industrial Corporation, USA | Blue Star | 75 mm * 25 mm |
Glass wool | Merk, India | 104086 | |
Hydrochloric acid | Merck, India | 1003170510 | |
Incubator | Thermo Scientific, USA | MaxQ600 | Shaking incubator |
Incubator | Khera, India | Sunbim | |
Iodine resublimed | Merck, India | 231-442-4 | resublimed Granules |
K12 –Kruss tensiometer | Kruss Scientific, Germany | K100 | |
Laminar air flow cabnet | Thermo Scientific, China | 1300 Series A2 | |
LCMS | Agilent Technologies, USA | 1260 Infinity II | |
Luria Broth | HIMEDIA, India | M575-500G | Powder |
Methanol | Merck, India | 107018 | |
Ninhydrin | Titan Biotech Limited, India | 1608 | |
p- anisaldehyde | Sigma, USA | 204-602-6 | |
Petri plate | Tarsons, India | 460090-90 MM | Radiation sterilized polypropylene |
Saponin | Merck, India | 232-462-6 | |
Sodium chloride | Merck, India | 231-598-3 | |
Test tubes | Borosil, India | 9800U06 | Glass tubes |
TLC plates | Merck, India | 1055540007 | |
Vortex | GeNei, India | 2006114318 | |
Water Bath | Julabo, India | SW21C |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone