Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.
Method Article
Here, we describe the construction of null mutants of Aeromonas in specific glycosyltransferases or regions containing glycosyltransferases, the motility assays, and flagella purification performed to establish the involvement and function of their encoded enzymes in the biosynthesis of a glycan, as well as the role of this glycan in bacterial pathogenesis.
The study of glycosylation in prokaryotes is a rapidly growing area. Bacteria harbor different glycosylated structures on their surface whose glycans constitute a strain-specific barcode. The associated glycans show higher diversity in sugar composition and structure than those of eukaryotes and are important in bacterial-host recognition processes and interaction with the environment. In pathogenic bacteria, glycoproteins have been involved in different stages of the infectious process, and glycan modifications can interfere with specific functions of glycoproteins. However, despite the advances made in the understanding of glycan composition, structure, and biosynthesis pathways, understanding of the role of glycoproteins in pathogenicity or interaction with the environment remains very limited. Furthermore, in some bacteria, the enzymes required for protein glycosylation are shared with other polysaccharide biosynthetic pathways, such as lipopolysaccharide and capsule biosynthetic pathways. The functional importance of glycosylation has been elucidated in several bacteria through mutation of specific genes thought to be involved in the glycosylation process and the study of its impact on the expression of the target glycoprotein and the modifying glycan. Mesophilic Aeromonas have a single and O-glycosylated polar flagellum. Flagellar glycans show diversity in carbohydrate composition and chain length between Aeromonas strains. However, all strains analyzed to date show a pseudaminic acid derivative as the linking sugar that modifies serine or threonine residues. The pseudaminic acid derivative is required for polar flagella assembly, and its loss has an impact on adhesion, biofilm formation, and colonization. The protocol detailed in this article describes how the construction of null mutants can be used to understand the involvement of genes or genome regions containing putative glycosyltransferases in the biosynthesis of a flagellar glycan. This includes the potential to understand the function of the glycosyltransferases involved and the role of the glycan. This will be achieved by comparing the glycan deficient mutant to the wild-type strain.
Protein glycosylation has been described in both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and consists of the covalent attachment of a glycan to an amino acid side chain1,2. In prokaryotes, this process usually occurs via two major enzymatic mechanisms: O- and N-glycosylation3. In O-glycosylation, the glycan is attached to the hydroxyl group of a serine (Ser) or threonine (Thr) residue. In N-glycosylation, the glycan is attached to the side chain amide nitrogen of an asparagine (Asn) residue within the tripeptide sequences Asn-X-Ser/Thr, where X could be any amino acid except proline.
Glycans can adopt linear or branched structures and are composed of monosaccharides or polysaccharides covalently linked by glycosidic bonds. In prokaryotes, glycans usually show diversity in sugar composition and structure in comparison to eukaryotic glycans4. Furthermore, two different bacterial glycosylation pathways that differ in how the glycan is assembled and transferred to the acceptor protein have been described: sequential and en bloc glycosylation5,6. For sequential glycosylation, the complex glycan is built up directly on the protein by successive addition of monosaccharides. In en bloc glycosylation, a pre-assembled glycan is transferred to the protein from a lipid-linked oligosaccharide by a specialized oligosaccharyltransferase (OTase). Both pathways have been shown to be involved in N- and O-glycosylation processes7.
Protein glycosylation has a role in modulating the physicochemical and biological properties of proteins. The presence of a glycan can influence how the protein interacts with its ligand, which affects the biological activity of the protein, but can also affect protein stability, solubility, susceptibility to proteolysis, immunogenicity, and microbe-host interactions8,9. However, several glycosylation parameters, such as the number of glycans, glycan composition, position, and attachment mechanism, could also affect protein function and structure.
Glycosyltransferases (GTs) are the key enzymes in the biosynthesis of complex glycans and glycoconjugates. These enzymes catalyze the glycosidic bond formation between a sugar moiety from an activated donor molecule and a specific substrate acceptor. GTs can use both nucleotides and non-nucleotides as donor molecules and target different substrate acceptors, such as proteins, saccharides, nucleic acids, and lipids10. Therefore, understanding GTs at the molecular level is important to identify their mechanisms of action and specificity, and also enables understanding how sugar composition of glycans that modify relevant molecules are related to pathogenicity. The Carbohydrate Active enzyme database (CAZy)11 classifies GTs according to their sequence homology, which provides a predictive tool since, in most of the GT families, the structural fold and mechanisms of action are invariant. However, four reasons make it difficult to predict substrate specificity of many GTs: 1) no clear sequence motif determining substrate specificity has been determined in prokaryotes12, 2) many GTs and OTases show substrate promiscuity13,14, 3) functional GTs are difficult to produce in high yield in recombinant form and 4) the identification of both donor and acceptor substrates is complex. Despite this, recent mutagenesis studies have made it possible to obtain significant advances in the understanding of catalytic mechanisms and subtract binding of GTs.
In bacteria, O-glycosylation seems to be more prevalent than N-glycosylation. The O-glycosylation sites do not show a consensus sequence, and many of the O-glycosylated proteins are secreted or cell-surface proteins, such as flagellins, pili, or autotransporters1. Flagellin glycosylation shows variability in the number of acceptor sites, glycan composition, and structure. For example, Burkholderia spp flagellins have only one acceptor site, while in Campylobacter jejuni, flagellins have as many as 19 acceptor sites15,16. Furthermore, for some bacteria, the glycan is a single monosaccharide, while other bacteria possess heterogeneous glycans compromised of different monosaccharides to form oligosaccharides. This heterogenicity occurs even among strains of the same species. Helicobacter flagellins are only modified by pseudaminic acid (PseAc)17, and Campylobacter flagellins can be modified by PseAc, the acetamidino form of the pseudaminic acid (PseAm) or legionaminic acid (LegAm), and glycans derived from these sugars with acetyl, N-acetylglucosamine, or propionic substitutions18,19. In Aeromonas, flagellins are modified by glycans whose composition ranges from a single PseAc acid derivative to a heteropolysaccharide20, and the attachment of glycans to the flagellin monomers is always via a PseAc derivative.
In general, glycosylation of flagellins is essential for flagellar filament assembly, motility, virulence, and host specificity. However, while flagellins of C. jejuni16, H. pylori17, and Aeromonas sp.21 cannot assemble into filament unless the protein monomers are glycosylated, Pseudomonas spp. and Burkholderia spp.15 do not require glycosylation for flagella assembly. Furthermore, in some C. jejuni strains, changes in sugar composition of the flagella glycan affect bacterial-host interaction and may play a role in evading certain immune responses16. Autoagglutination is another phenotypic characteristic affected by modifications in the composition of glycans associated with flagellins. A lower autoagglutination leads to a reduction in the ability to form microcolonies and biofilm22. In some bacteria, the ability of flagella to trigger a pro-inflammatory response was linked to flagellin glycosylation. Thus, in P. aeruginosa, glycosylated flagellin induces a higher pro-inflammatory response than unglycosylated23.
Aeromonas are Gram-negative bacteria ubiquitous in the environment, which allows them to be at the interface of all One Health components24. Mesophilic Aeromonas have a single polar flagellum, which is constitutively produced. More than half of clinical isolates also express lateral flagellin, inducible in high viscosity media or plates. Different studies have related both flagella types with the early stages of bacterial pathogenesis25. While polar flagellins reported to date are O-glycosylated at 5-8 Ser or Thr residues of its central immunogenic domains, lateral flagellins are not O-glycosylated in all the strains. Although polar flagella glycans from different strains show diversity in their carbohydrate composition and chain length20, the linking sugar has been shown to be a pseudaminic acid derivative.
The goal of this manuscript is to describe a method to obtain null mutants in specific GTs or chromosomal regions containing GTs to analyze their involvement in the biosynthesis of relevant polysaccharides and in bacterial pathogenicity, as well as the role of the glycan itself. As an example, we identify and delete a chromosomal region containing GTs of Aeromonas to establish its involvement in polar flagellin glycosylation and analyze the role of the flagellin glycan. We show how to delete a specific GT to establish its function in the biosynthesis of this glycan and the role of modified glycan. Although using Aeromonas as an example, the principle can be used to identify and study flagella glycosylation islands of other Gram-negative bacteria and analyze the function of GTs involved in the biosynthesis of other glycans such as the O-antigen lipopolysaccharide.
The schematic representation of the procedure is shown in Figure 1.
1. Bioinformatic identification of flagella glycosylation island (FGIs) in Aeromonas
2. Generation of null mutants in flagella glycosylation island genes
NOTE: This method of mutagenesis is based on the allelic exchange of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in-frame deletion products using the suicide vector pDM428 (GenBank: KC795686.1). Replication of pDM4 vector is lambda pir dependent, and the complete allelic exchange is coerced by utilizing the sacB gene located on the vector.
3. Motility assays
NOTE: In some bacterial species with glycosylated flagella, modifications in the levels of glycosylation or glycan composition affect the assembly of flagellins, which is usually reflected as a motility reduction or absence of motility. Therefore, two motility assays were performed with the null mutants.
4. Flagella purification
This methodology provides an effective system to generate null mutants in genes or chromosomal regions of Aeromonas that can affect flagella glycosylation and the role of flagella filament (Figure 1).
The protocol starts with the bioinformatic identification of putative FGIs and the genes encoding GTs presents in this region. In Aeromonas, the chromosomal location of FGIs is based on the detection of three types of genes: genes involved in the bi...
The critical early step of this method is the identification of regions involved in the glycosylation of flagella and putative GTs because these enzymes show high homology and are involved in many processes. Bioinformatic analysis of Aeromonas genomes in public databases shows that this region is adjacent to the polar flagella region 2, which contains the flagellin genes in many strains and contains genes involved in the biosynthesis of pseudaminic acid27. This has made it possible to dev...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This work was supported by the National Research Council Canada, for the Plan Nacional de I + D (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain) and for the Generalitat de Catalunya (Centre de Referència en Biotecnologia).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
ABI PRISM Big Dye Terminator v. 3.1 Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit | Applied Biosystems | 4337455 | Used for sequencing |
AccuPrime Taq DNA Polymerase, high fidelity | Invitrogen | 12346-086 | Used for amplification of AB, CD and AD fragments |
Agarose | Conda-Pronadise | 8008 | Used for DNA electrophoresis |
Alkaline phosphatase, calf intestinal (CIAP) | Promega | M1821 | Used to remove phosphate at the 5’ end |
Bacto agar | Becton Dickinson | 214010 | Use for motility analysis |
BamHI | Promega | R6021 | Used for endonuclease restriction |
BglII | Promega | R6081 | Used for endonuclease restriction |
BioDoc-It Imagin System | UVP | Bio-imaging station used for DNA visualization | |
Biotaq polymerase | Bioline | BIO-21040 | Used for colony screening |
Cesium chloride | Applichem | A1126,0100 | Used for flagella purification |
Chloramphenicol | Applichem | A1806,0025 | Used for triparental mating |
Cytiva illustra GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit | Cytivia | 28-9034-71 | Used for purification of PCR amplicons and DNA fragments. |
EDTA | Applichem | 131026.1211 | Used for DNA electrophoresis |
Electroporation cuvettes 2 mm gap | VWR | 732-1133 | Used for transformation |
Ethidium bromide | Applichem | A1152,0025 | Use for DNA visualization |
HyperLadder 1 Kb marker | Bioline | BIO-33053 | DNA marker |
Invitrogen Easy-DNA gDNA Purification Kit | Invitrogen | 10750204 | Used for bacterial chromosomal DNA purification |
Luria-Bertani (LB) Miller agar | Condalab | 996 | Used for Escherichia coli culture |
Luria-Bertani (LB) Miller broth | Condalab | 1551 | Used for Escherichia coli culture |
Nanodrop ND-1000 | NanoDrop Techonologies Inc | Spectrophotometer used for DNA quantification | |
Rifampicin | Applichem | A2220,0005 | Used for triparental mating |
SOC Medium | Invitrogen | 15544034 | Used for electroporation recovery |
Spectinomycin | Applichem | A3834,0005 | Used for triparental mating |
SW 41 Ti Swinging-Bucket Rotor | Beckman | 331362 | Used for flagella purification |
T4 DNA ligase | Invitrogen | 15224017 | Used for ligation reaction |
Trypticasein soy agar | Condalab | 1068 | Used for Aeromonas grown |
Trypticasein soy broth | Condalab | 1224 | Used for Aeromonas grown |
Tryptone | Condalab | 1612 | Use for motility analysis |
Tris | Applichem | A2264,0500 | Used for DNA electrophoresis and flagella purification |
Triton X-100 | Applichem | A4975,0100 | Used for bacterial lysis |
Ultra Clear tubes (14 mm x 89 mm) | Beckman | 344059 | Used for flagella purification |
Veriti 96 well Thermal Cycler | Applied Biosystems | Used for PCR reactions | |
Zyppy Plasmid Miniprep II Kit | Zymmo research | D4020 | Used for isolation of plasmid DNA |
Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE
Zapytaj o uprawnieniaThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone