Zaloguj się

Aby wyświetlić tę treść, wymagana jest subskrypcja JoVE. Zaloguj się lub rozpocznij bezpłatny okres próbny.

W tym Artykule

  • Podsumowanie
  • Streszczenie
  • Wprowadzenie
  • Protokół
  • Wyniki
  • Dyskusje
  • Ujawnienia
  • Podziękowania
  • Materiały
  • Odniesienia
  • Przedruki i uprawnienia

Podsumowanie

Here, we describe protocols for acquiring good-quality images using novel, noninvasive imaging devices of reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and combined RCM and optical coherence tomography (OCT). We also familiarize clinicians with their clinical applications so that they can integrate the techniques into regular clinical workflows to improve patient care.

Streszczenie

Skin cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Diagnosis relies on visual inspection and dermoscopy followed by biopsy for histopathological confirmation. While the sensitivity of dermoscopy is high, the lower specificity results in 70%-80% of the biopsies being diagnosed as benign lesions on histopathology (false positives on dermoscopy).

Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging can noninvasively guide the diagnosis of skin cancers. RCM visualizes cellular morphology in en-face layers. It has doubled the diagnostic specificity for melanoma and pigmented keratinocytic skin cancers over dermoscopy, halving the number of biopsies of benign lesions. RCM acquired billing codes in the USA and is now being integrated into clinics.

However, limitations such as the shallow depth (~200 µm) of imaging, poor contrast for nonpigmented skin lesions, and imaging in en-face layers result in relatively lower specificity for the detection of nonpigmented basal cell carcinoma (BCCs) — superficial BCCs contiguous with the basal cell layer and deeper infiltrative BCCs. In contrast, OCT lacks cellular resolution but images tissue in vertical planes down to a depth of ~1 mm, which allows the detection of both superficial and deeper subtypes of BCCs. Thus, both techniques are essentially complementary.

A "multi-modal," combined RCM-OCT device simultaneously images skin lesions in both en-face and vertical modes. It is useful for the diagnosis and management of BCCs (nonsurgical treatment for superficial BCCs vs. surgical treatment for deeper lesions). A marked improvement in specificity is obtained for detecting small, nonpigmented BCCs over RCM alone. RCM and RCM-OCT devices are bringing a major paradigm shift in the diagnosis and management of skin cancers; however, their use is currently limited to academic tertiary care centers and some private clinics. This paper familiarizes clinicians with these devices and their applications, addressing translational barriers into routine clinical workflow.

Wprowadzenie

Traditionally, the diagnosis of skin cancer relies on visual inspection of the lesion followed by a closer look at suspicious lesions using a magnifying lens called a dermatoscope. A dermatoscope provides subsurface information that increases sensitivity and specificity over that of visual inspection for diagnosing skin cancers1,2. However, dermoscopy lacks cellular detail, often leading to a biopsy for histopathological confirmation. The low and variable (67% to 97%) specificity of dermoscopy3 results in false positives and biopsies that turn out to show benign lesions on pathology. A biopsy is not only an invasive procedure that causes bleeding and pain4 but is also highly undesirable on cosmetically sensitive regions such as the face due to scarring.

To improve patient care by overcoming existing limitations, many noninvasive, in vivo imaging devices are being explored5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. RCM and OCT devices are the two main optical noninvasive devices that are used for diagnosing skin lesions, especially skin cancers. RCM has acquired Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) billing codes in the USA and is being increasingly used in academic tertiary care centers and some private clinics7,8,19. RCM images lesions at near-histological (cellular) resolution. However, images are in the en-face plane (visualization of one layer of skin at a time), and the depth of imaging is limited to ~200 µm, sufficient to reach the superficial (papillary) dermis only. RCM imaging relies on the reflectance contrast from various structures in the skin. Melanin imparts the highest contrast, making pigmented lesions bright and easier to diagnose. Thus, RCM combined with dermoscopy has significantly improved diagnosis (sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 82%) over dermoscopy of pigmented lesions, including melanoma20. However, due to a lack of melanin contrast in pink lesions, especially for BCCs, RCM has lower specificity (37.5%-75.5%)21. A conventional OCT device, another commonly used noninvasive device, images lesion up to 1 mm in depth within the skin and visualizes them in a vertical plane (similar to histopathology)9. However, OCT lacks cellular resolution. OCT is primarily used for diagnosing keratinocytic lesions, especially BCCs, but still has lower specificity9.

Thus, to overcome the existing limitations of these devices, a multi-modal RCM-OCT device has been built22. This device incorporates RCM and OCT within a single, handheld imaging probe, enabling the simultaneous acquisition of co-registered en-face RCM images and vertical OCT images of the lesion. OCT provides architectural detail of the lesions and can image deeper (up to a depth of ~1 mm) within the skin. It also has a larger field of view (FOV) of ~2 mm22 compared to the handheld RCM device (~0.75 mm x 0.75 mm). RCM images are used to provide cellular details of the lesion identified on OCT. This prototype is not yet commercialized and is being used as an investigational device in clinics23,24,25.

Despite their success in improving the diagnosis and management of skin cancers (as supported by the literature), these devices are not yet widely used in clinics. This is mainly due to the paucity of experts who can read these images but is also due to the lack of trained technicians who can acquire diagnostic-quality images efficiently (within a clinical time frame) at the bedside8. In this manuscript, the goal is to facilitate the awareness and eventual adoption of these devices in clinics. To achieve this goal, we familiarize dermatologists, dermatopathologists, and Mohs surgeons with images of normal skin and skin cancers acquired with the RCM and RCM-OCT devices. We will also detail the utility of each device for the diagnosis of skin cancers. Most importantly, the focus of this manuscript is to provide step-by-step guidance for image acquisition using these devices, which will ensure good-quality images for clinical use.

Protokół

All the protocols described below follow the guidelines of the institutional human research ethics committee.

1. RCM device and imaging protocol

NOTE: There are two commercially available in vivo RCM devices: wide-probe RCM (WP-RCM) and handheld RCM (HH-RCM). The WP-RCM comes integrated with a digital dermatoscope. These two devices are available separately or as a combined unit. Below are the image acquisition protocols using the latest generation (Generation 4) of the WP-RCM and HH-RCM devices along with their clinical indications.

  1. Lesion selection and clinical indications
    1. Look for the following types of lesions: dermoscopically equivocal pink (BCC, squamous cell carcinoma [SCC], actinic keratosis [AK], other benign lesions) or pigmented lesion (nevi and melanoma, pigmented keratinocytic lesions); a nevus that has recently changed on clinical or dermoscopy examination; inflammatory lesions to determine inflammatory patterns.
    2. Perform mapping for lentigo maligna (LM) margins to determine the extent of the lesion and mapping and selection of biopsy sites for disease with subclinical extension such as extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) and LM.
    3. Carry out noninvasive monitoring of nonsurgical treatment such as topical drugs (imiquimod), radiation, photodynamic therapy, and laser ablation.
  2. For device selection, use the WP-RCM device for lesions located on relatively flat surfaces of skin (the trunk and extremities) and the HH-RCM device for lesions on curved surfaces (the nose, earlobes, eyelids, and genitalia).
    NOTE: Selection of the imaging device will mainly depend on the location of the lesion.
  3. For imaging, position the patient on a fully reclining chair or a flat examination table with pillows or an armrest for support and to achieve a flat imaging surface.
    NOTE: Older generation (Generation 3) WP-RCM devices took ~30 min per lesion. Imaging a single lesion may require ~15 min with the newer generation (Generation 4) WP-RCM device currently being used in clinics. Despite the improved acquisition time, positioning the patient comfortably will ensure minimum motion artifacts and aid the acquisition of superior quality images. The following steps may help with correctly positioning the patient:
  4. To prepare for imaging, clean the lesion and surrounding skin with an alcohol wipe to eliminate any dirt, lotion, or make-up. Shave hairy skin surfaces before attaching the tissue window to avoid air bubbles that can hinder the visualization of tissue microstructures.
    NOTE: For removing heavy cosmetics or sunscreens, clean the site with a gentle soap and water prior to cleaning with alcohol.
  5. Image acquisition using the WP-RCM device (Figure 1, Figure 2, Supplemental Figure S1, Supplemental Figure S2, and Supplemental Figure S3)
    ​NOTE: WP-RCM devices are capable of capturing stacks, mosaic, live single-framed videos, and single-framed images.
    1. To attach a disposable plastic window cap to the lesion (Figure 1), position the probe perpendicular to the lesion for the best images. Refer to Figure 1A-F for an example of attachment. Add a drop of mineral oil on the center of the plastic window, carefully spreading it across the window width (Figure 1A). Remove the paper backing from the adhesive side of the plastic window. Stretch the skin gently to avoid wrinkling and attach the window.
      NOTE: Use food-grade mineral oil that is safe and has a high viscosity. Ensure that the lesion is centered and covered in its entirety. For lesions larger than 8 mm x 8 mm, either image areas of concern based on dermoscopy or perform separate imaging sessions to cover the entire lesion.
    2. Acquiring dermoscopy images (Figure 1C,D)
      NOTE: A dermoscopy image is acquired to serve as a guide for navigating within the lesion. The following steps should be used to ensure perfect registration between the dermoscopy image and the confocal image.
      1. Hover the WP-RCM probe over the plastic window cap and approximate the best angle of insertion for the probe (Figure 1C). Locate the small, white arrow located on the side of the probe (Figure 1C) and align it with the arrow on the side of the dermoscopy camera (Figure 1C).
      2. Insert the dermoscopy camera into the plastic window cap (Figure 1D). Press the trigger on the camera to acquire an image. Remove the dermatoscope. Before starting the imaging session, ensure that the dermatoscope image covers the entire lesion surface.
    3. To attach the RCM probe to the plastic disposable cap (Figure 1E,F), place a pea-sized amount of ultrasound gel inside the disposable plastic window cap (Figure 1E). Insert the probe within the cap until a sharp click is heard (Figure 1F).
      NOTE: For the best images, insert the probe perpendicular (at a 90° angle) to the plastic window. The height of the examination chair can be raised to achieve a flatter surface, reduce motion artifacts, expel air bubbles (Figure 3 and Figure 4), and ensure secure attachment to the skin.
    4. Acquiring RCM images (Figure 2, Supplemental Figure S1, and Supplemental Figure S2)
      1. Use the dermoscopy image (step 5.2.) for guiding the RCM image acquisition (Supplemental Figure S1). Select the center of the lesion and identify the topmost (brightest) layer of the skin — the anucleate layer of the stratum corneum (Supplemental Figure S1).
      2. Set the imaging depth to zero at this level (Supplemental Figure S1).
        NOTE: This depth serves as a reference point for determining the actual z-depth of subsequent layers within the lesion.
      3. Acquire a stack in the lesion's center (Figure 2 and Supplemental Figure S1) by pressing the stack icon. Select an anatomical site from the drop-down menu: face or body. Set 4.5 µm step-size and 250 µm depth.
        NOTE: Begin the stacks from the stratum corneum and end at the deepest visible layers in the dermis. Supplemental Figure S1 shows an example of how to acquire a stack, while Figure 2 gives an example of a stack.
      4. Acquire a mosaic: take the first mosaic at the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) (Supplemental Figure S2). Identify the DEJ layer in the stack acquired and then use the mouse to select an 8 mm x 8 mm square to cover the entire lesion. Press the mosaic icon to complete the operation (Supplemental Figure S2). Acquire at least 5 mosaics at various depths: stratum corneum, stratum spinosum, suprabasal layer, DEJ, and superficial papillary dermis.
      5. Open the DEJ mosaic to guide the acquisition of the subsequent mosaics. Click on any structure on the DEJ mosaic to bring up that area on the live view imaging. Scroll down to acquire mosaics at the dermis and then up (from the DEJ) to take mosaics in the epidermis.
      6. Get the acquired mosaics evaluated by the expert RCM reader present at the bedside to identify the region of interest and take stacks. In the absence of an expert at the bedside, capture 5 stacks: one in each quadrant and one in the center of the lesion with a homogeneous pattern on dermoscopy (steps 1.5.2.). For heterogeneous lesions, acquire additional stacks to cover all the dermoscopy features.
        NOTE: A "stack" (Figure 2) is a sequential collection of high-resolution, single-frame, small field of view (FOV) images (0.5mm x 0.5 mm) acquired in depth starting from the topmost layer of the epidermis to the superficial dermis (~200 µm). A "mosaic" (Supplemental Figure S2) is a large FOV of images obtained by stitching individual 500 µm x 500 µm images together in "X-Y" (horizontal en face plane).
    5. Completing an imaging session
      1. Click on Done Imaging.
      2. Detach the microscope from the plastic window. Remove the plastic window by gently holding the patient's skin taut and dispose of it. Wipe off oil on the skin with an alcohol swab.
      3. Detach the protective cone surrounding the microscope lens. Clean the tip of the objective lens with an alcohol swab to remove the ultrasound gel. Dry the objective lens with a paper towel. Reattach the plastic cone to the microscope probe.
        NOTE: Images can be read, and a report can be generated and signed at the bedside by a trained physician. In the absence of an expert reader, a remote expert can be consulted either by transferring the images via the cloud or via a live teleconfocal session26.
    6. Generating a Confocal Diagnostic Evaluation report (Supplemental Figure S3)
      1. Click on New Evaluation. Enter the diagnosis from the preselected options in the dropdown menu.
      2. If another imaging session is required, select images inadequate and need to be recaptured. If a descriptive diagnosis is needed, select other and describe in the free text box at the end of the form. Enter the CPT code for billing7 (Supplemental Figure S3A). Select the applicable features seen during imaging from the report checklist (Supplemental Figure S3B). Select the applicable management from the checklist.
        NOTE: No billing code is applicable for HH-RCM imaging.
      3. Click on Finish and Sign. Generate the report as a PDF and print. Get the report signed by a physician and add it to the patient's chart for billing.
  6. Image acquisition using the HH-RCM device (Figure 5)
    NOTE: HH-RCM devices are capable of capturing stacks, live single-framed videos, and single-framed images.
    1. Encircle the lesion identified by the physician with a paper ring. Use steps detailed in section 3. for positioning the patient and cleaning the lesion site.
      NOTE: Select the size of the paper ring (5-15 mm) based on the lesion size to define the boundary of the lesion and ensure imaging is done within the lesion. If a paper ring is not available, use paper tape to define the lesion.
    2. Remove the plastic cap covering the microscope lens. Apply a pea-sized amount of ultrasound gel to the objective lens of the HH-RCM and cover it with the plastic cap (Supplemental Figure S3A). Add a generous drop of mineral oil to the side of the plastic cap that will be touching the skin.
      NOTE: Increase the amount of oil for very dry skin, if needed.
    3. Press the probe to the lesion site on the skin with firm pressure. Use the z-depth controls on the HH-RCM device to move up and down at various depths within the lesion (Supplemental Figure S3B). Acquire multiple single-frame images and stacks in the regions of interest. Take stacks as described in step 1.5.4.3.
    4. For large lesions where the WP-RCM device cannot be attached, take continuous videos at various layers by moving the HH-RCM probe over the entire lesion surface. Click on the video capture symbol to do so. Record the movement of blood cells within vessels, if needed.
      NOTE: These videos can be later stitched using software to provide large FOV images similar to mosaics.
    5. Press Done Imaging after the imaging session is complete. Clean the lesion with an alcohol swab to remove the oil. Remove the ultrasound gel from the objective lens of the probe by cleaning it with an alcohol wipe and reattaching the plastic cap.
      ​NOTE: Unlike the WP-RCM device, which can be operated by a technician, the HH-RCM should be operated by an RCM reader who can interpret images in real time to navigate within the lesion and arrive at a correct diagnosis.

2. Combined RCM-OCT device and imaging protocol

NOTE: There is only one prototype of the RCM-OCT device. This device has a handheld probe and can be used on all body surfaces, similar to the HH-RCM device. It acquires RCM stacks (similar to the RCM device) and OCT rasters (a video of sequential, cross-sectional images22). Both RCM and OCT images are in gray scale. RCM images have an FOV of ~200 µm x 200 µm, while the OCT image has an FOV of 2 mm (in width) x 1 mm (in depth). Below is the image acquisition protocol using the RCM-OCT device, along with their clinical indications. Figure 6 shows an image of the RCM-OCT device, while Figure 7 shows the software system of the RCM-OCT device.

  1. Lesion selection
    1. Look for dermoscopically equivocal pink or pigmented lesion to rule out BCC.
    2. Assess the depth of BCC for management, and assess the residual BCC post treatment.
  2. Positioning the patient for imaging: Imaging a single lesion may require up to 20 minutes with the RCM-OCT device. The device is also a handheld probe similar to the HH-RCM device and, thus, can be moved freely over the lesion. For details of patient positioning, refer to section 1.4. above.
  3. Preparation of the site for imaging: When using this probe, ensure that the boundary of the lesion is free of excessive hair and topical impurities and is clearly defined. Refer to step 1.4.1. above for more detail.
  4. Image acquisition using the RCM-OCT device (Figure 6 and Figure 7)
    1. Prepare the probe similarly to the one used for the HH-RCM (steps 1.6.1-1.6.2.)
    2. Acquire images in line imaging mode and raster mode.
      1. Click on imaging settings (Figure 7A). Select the line imaging mode to acquire an RCM image (cellular resolution) (Figure 7B). Set the step size to 5 µm and the number of steps to 40 (Figure 7A).
      2. Click on Grab. Acquire stacks following step 1.5.4.3. Once complete, click on the Freeze button.
      3. Click on imaging settings. Select raster mode to acquire a correlative OCT video for the lesion architecture (Figure 7B). Switch to the technician tab (Figure 7C). Once complete, click on the Grab button (Figure 7A) and immediately press the save button.
      4. Acquire multiple stacks and videos based on the physician's interest.
      5. Clean the lesion and machine as described in step 1.6.5.

Wyniki

Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM)
Image interpretation on RCM:
The RCM images are interpreted in a manner that mimics the evaluation of histopathology slides. Mosaics are evaluated first to get the overall architectural detail and identify areas of concern, akin to the evaluation of histology sections on scanning magnification (2x). This is followed by zooming in on the mosaic for evaluation of the cellular details, similar to evaluating slides at high magnification (20x)...

Dyskusje

In this article, we have described protocols for image acquisition using in vivo RCM and RCM-OCT devices. Currently, there are two commercially available RCM devices: A wide-probe or arm-mounted RCM (WP-RCM) device and a handheld RCM (HH-RCM) device. It is crucial to understand when to use these devices in clinical settings. Cancer type and location are the main factors determining the selection of the device.

The WP-RCM device is well-suited for lesions on flat and gently undulating ...

Ujawnienia

Ucalene Harris has no competing financial interest. Dr. Jain is a consultant on Enspectra Health Inc. Dr. Milind Rajadhyaksha is a former employee of and owns equity in Caliber ID (formerly, Lucid Inc.), the company that manufactures and sells the VivaScope confocal microscope. The VivaScope is the commercial version of an original laboratory prototype that was developed by Dr. Rajadhyaksha when he was at Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School.

Podziękowania

A special thank you is given to Kwami Ketosugbo and Emily Cowen for being volunteers for imaging.This research is funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute /National Institutes of Health (P30-CA008748) made to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Materiały

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Crystal Plus 500FG mineral oilSTE Oil Company, Inc.A food grade, high viscous mineral oil used with our various devices during in vivo imaging.
RCM-OCTPhysical Science Inc.-A “multi-modal” combined RCM-OCT device simultaneously images skin lesions in both horizonal and vertical modes.
Vivascope 1500Caliber I.D.-A wide-probe RCM (WP-RCM) device that attaches to the skin to campture in vivo devices.
Vivascope 3000Caliber I.D.-A hand-held RCM (HH-RCM) device that is moved across the skin to capture in vivo images.

Odniesienia

  1. Argenziano, G., et al. Accuracy in melanoma detection: A 10-year multicenter survey. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 67 (1), 54-59 (2012).
  2. Vestergaard, M. E., Macaskill, P., Holt, P. E., Menzies, S. W. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: A meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. British Journal of Dermatology. 159 (3), 669-676 (2008).
  3. Reiter, O., et al. The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for basal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 80 (5), 1380-1388 (2019).
  4. Abhishek, K., Khunger, N. Complications of skin biopsy. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery. 8 (4), 239-241 (2015).
  5. Navarrete-Dechent, C., Fischer, C., Tkaczyk, E., Jain, M., Rao, B. K. Chapter 5: Principles of non-invasive diagnostic techniques in dermatology. Moschella and Hurley's Dermatology. 1, (2019).
  6. Wassef, C., Rao, B. K. Uses of non-invasive imaging in the diagnosis of skin cancer: An overview of the currently available modalities. International Journal of Dermatology. 52 (12), 1481-1489 (2013).
  7. Rajadhyaksha, M., Marghoob, A., Rossi, A., Halpern, A. C., Nehal, K. S. Reflectance confocal microscopy of skin in vivo: From bench to bedside. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 49 (1), 7-19 (2017).
  8. Jain, M., Pulijal, S. V., Rajadhyaksha, M., Halpern, A. C., Gonzalez, S. Evaluation of bedside diagnostic accuracy, learning curve, and challenges for a novice reflectance confocal microscopy reader for skin cancer detection in vivo. JAMA Dermatology. 154 (8), 962-965 (2018).
  9. Sattler, E., Kästle, R., Welzel, J. Optical coherence tomography in dermatology. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 18 (6), 061224 (2013).
  10. Wang, Y. -. J., Huang, Y. -. K., Wang, J. -. Y., Wu, Y. -. H. In vivo characterization of large cell acanthoma by cellular resolution optical coherent tomography. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 26, 199-202 (2019).
  11. Balu, M., et al. Distinguishing between benign and malignant melanocytic nevi by in vivo multiphoton microscopy. Cancer Research. 74 (10), 2688-2697 (2014).
  12. Balu, M., et al. In vivo multiphoton microscopy of basal cell carcinoma. JAMA Dermatology. 151 (10), 1068-1074 (2015).
  13. Lentsch, G., et al. Non-invasive optical biopsy by multiphoton microscopy identifies the live morphology of common melanocytic nevi. Pigment Cell and Melanoma Research. 33 (6), 869-877 (2020).
  14. Dimitrow, E., et al. Sensitivity and specificity of multiphoton laser tomography for in vivo and ex vivo diagnosis of malignant melanoma. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 129 (7), 1752-1758 (2009).
  15. Ruini, C., et al. Line-field optical coherence tomography: In vivo diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma subtypes compared with histopathology. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. 46 (8), 1471-1481 (2021).
  16. Suppa, M., et al. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography of basal cell carcinoma: A descriptive study. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 35 (5), 1099-1110 (2021).
  17. Wang, Y. J., Wang, J. Y., Wu, Y. H. Application of cellular resolution full-field optical coherence tomography in vivo for the diagnosis of skin tumours and inflammatory skin diseases: A pilot study. Dermatology. 238 (1), 121-131 (2022).
  18. Jain, M., et al. Rapid evaluation of fresh ex vivo kidney tissue with full-field optical coherence tomography. Journal of Pathology Informatics. 6, 53 (2015).
  19. Mehta, P. P., et al. Patterns of use of reflectance confocal microscopy at a tertiary referral dermatology clinic. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. , (2021).
  20. Dinnes, J., et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 12 (12), (2018).
  21. Dinnes, J., et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 12 (12), (2018).
  22. Iftimia, N., et al. Handheld optical coherence tomography-reflectance confocal microscopy probe for detection of basal cell carcinoma and delineation of margins. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 22 (7), 76006 (2017).
  23. Monnier, J., et al. Combined reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography to improve the diagnosis of equivocal lesions for basal cell carcinoma. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 86 (4), 934-936 (2021).
  24. Navarrete-Dechent, C., et al. Management of complex head-and-neck basal cell carcinomas using a combined reflectance confocal microscopy/optical coherence tomography: a descriptive study. Archives of Dermatological Research. 313 (3), 193-200 (2021).
  25. Sahu, A., et al. Evaluation of a combined reflectance confocal microscopy-optical coherence tomography device for detection and depth assessment of basal cell carcinoma. JAMA Dermatology. 154 (10), 1175-1183 (2018).
  26. Rubinstein, G., Garfinkel, J., Jain, M. Live, remote control of an in vivo reflectance confocal microscope for diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma at the bedside of a patient 2500 miles away: A novel tele-reflectance confocal microscope approach. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 81 (2), 41-42 (2019).
  27. Scope, A., et al. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy imaging of melanocytic skin lesions: Consensus terminology glossary and illustrative images. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 57 (4), 644-658 (2007).
  28. Calzavara-Pinton, P., Longo, C., Venturini, M., Sala, R., Pellacani, G. Reflectance confocal microscopy for in vivo skin imaging. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 84 (6), 1421-1430 (2008).
  29. Rajadhyaksha, M., Grossman, M., Esterowitz, D., Webb, R. H., Anderson, R. R. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin: Melanin provides strong contrast. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 104 (6), 946-952 (1995).
  30. Gonzalez, S., Gonzalez, E., White, W. M., Rajadhyaksha, M., Anderson, R. R. Allergic contact dermatitis: Correlation of in vivo confocal imaging to routine histology. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 40 (5), 708-713 (1999).
  31. Sahu, A., et al. Combined PARP1-targeted nuclear contrast and reflectance contrast enhances confocal microscopic detection of basal cell carcinoma. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 63 (6), 912-918 (2021).
  32. González, S., Sackstein, R., Anderson, R. R., Rajadhyaksha, M. Real-time evidence of in vivo leukocyte trafficking in human skin by reflectance confocal microscopy. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 117 (2), 384-386 (2001).
  33. Navarrete-Dechent, C., et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy terminology glossary for nonmelanocytic skin lesions: A systematic review. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 80 (5), 1414-1427 (2019).
  34. Navarrete-Dechent, C., et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy terminology glossary for melanocytic skin lesions: A systematic review. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 84 (1), 102-119 (2021).
  35. Sattler, E., Kastle, R., Welzel, J. Optical coherence tomography in dermatology. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 18 (6), 061224 (2013).
  36. Park, E. S. Skin-layer analysis using optical coherence tomography. Medical Lasers. 3 (1), 1-4 (2014).
  37. Marra, D. E., Torres, A., Schanbacher, C. F., Gonzalez, S. Detection of residual basal cell carcinoma by in vivo confocal microscopy. Dermatologic Surgery. 31 (5), 538-541 (2005).
  38. Alarcon, I., et al. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy to monitor the response of lentigo maligna to imiquimod. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 71 (1), 49-55 (2014).
  39. Guitera, P., et al. Surveillance for treatment failure of lentigo maligna with dermoscopy and in vivo confocal microscopy: new descriptors. British Journal of Dermatology. 170 (6), 1305-1312 (2014).
  40. Menge, T. D., Hibler, B. P., Cordova, M. A., Nehal, K. S., Rossi, A. M. Concordance of handheld reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) with histopathology in the diagnosis of lentigo maligna (LM): A prospective study. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 74 (6), 1114-1120 (2016).
  41. Chen, C. S., Elias, M., Busam, K., Rajadhyaksha, M., Marghoob, A. A. Multimodal in vivo optical imaging, including confocal microscopy, facilitates presurgical margin mapping for clinically complex lentigo maligna melanoma. British Journal of Dermatology. 153 (5), 1031-1036 (2005).
  42. Yelamos, O., et al. Handheld reflectance confocal microscopy for the detection of recurrent extramammary Paget disease. JAMA Dermatology. 153 (7), 689-693 (2017).
  43. Ardigo, M., Longo, C., Gonzalez, S. Multicentre study on inflammatory skin diseases from The International Confocal Working Group: Specific confocal microscopy features and an algorithmic method of diagnosis. British Journal of Dermatology. 175 (2), 364-374 (2016).
  44. Moscarella, E., Argenziano, G., Lallas, A., Pellacani, G., Longo, C. Confocal microscopy: A new era in understanding the pathophysiologic background of inflammatory skin diseases. Experimental Dermatology. 23 (5), 320-321 (2014).
  45. Bertrand, C., Corcuff, P. In vivo spatio-temporal visualization of the human skin by real-time confocal microscopy. Scanning. 16 (3), 150-154 (1994).
  46. Saknite, I., et al. Features of cutaneous acute graft-versus-host disease by reflectance confocal microscopy. British Journal of Dermatology. 181 (4), 829-831 (2019).
  47. Aleissa, S., et al. Presurgical evaluation of basal cell carcinoma using combined reflectance confocal microscopy-optical coherence tomography: A prospective study. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 82 (4), 962-968 (2020).
  48. Bang, A. S., et al. Noninvasive, in vivo, characterization of cutaneous metastases using a novel multimodal RCM-OCT imaging device: A case-series. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. , (2022).
  49. Dickensheets, D. L., Kreitinger, S., Peterson, G., Heger, M., Rajadhyaksha, M. Wide-field imaging combined with confocal microscopy using a miniature f/5 camera integrated within a high NA objective lens. Optics Letters. 42 (7), 1241-1244 (2017).
  50. Kose, K., et al. Automated video-mosaicking approach for confocal microscopic imaging in vivo: an approach to address challenges in imaging living tissue and extend field of view. Scientific Reports. 7 (1), 10759 (2017).
  51. Zhao, J., et al. Deep learning-based denoising in high-speed portable reflectance confocal microscopy. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 53 (6), 880-891 (2021).
  52. Curiel-Lewandrowski, C., Stratton, D. B., Gong, C., Kang, D. Preliminary imaging of skin lesions with near-infrared, portable, confocal microscopy. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 85 (6), 1624-1625 (2021).
  53. Freeman, E. E., et al. Feasibility and implementation of portable confocal microscopy for point-of-care diagnosis of cutaneous lesions in a low-resource setting. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 84 (2), 499-502 (2021).
  54. Peterson, G., et al. Feasibility of a video-mosaicking approach to extend the field-of-view for reflectance confocal microscopy in the oral cavity in vivo. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 51 (5), 439-451 (2019).
  55. Kurugol, S., et al. Automated delineation of dermal-epidermal junction in reflectance confocal microscopy image stacks of human skin. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 135 (3), 710-717 (2015).
  56. Kose, K., et al. Utilizing machine learning for image quality assessment for reflectance confocal microscopy. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 140 (6), 1214-1222 (2020).
  57. Campanella, G., et al. Deep learning for basal cell carcinoma detection for reflectance confocal microscopy. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 142 (1), 97-103 (2022).
  58. Wodzinski, M., Skalski, A., Witkowski, A., Pellacani, G., Ludzik, J. Convolutional neural network approach to classify skin lesions using reflectance confocal microscopy. 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society EMBC 2019. , (2019).

Przedruki i uprawnienia

Zapytaj o uprawnienia na użycie tekstu lub obrazów z tego artykułu JoVE

Zapytaj o uprawnienia

Przeglądaj więcej artyków

Reflectance Confocal MicroscopyOptical Coherence TomographyNoninvasive DiagnosisSkin CancersImage AcquisitionHistopathological ResolutionBedside DiagnosisSkin LesionsOne stop Shop Patient CareImagingTriage Skin LesionsOral LesionsHistotechnician Protocol

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Prywatność

Warunki Korzystania

Zasady

Badania

Edukacja

O JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone