Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

A method for implanting electrodes into the subthalamic nucleus (STN) of rats is described. Better localization of the STN was achieved by using a microrecording system. Furthermore, a stimulation set-up is presented that is characterized by long-lasting connections between the head of the animal and the stimulator.

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely used and effective therapy for several neurologic disorders, such as idiopathic Parkinson’s disease, dystonia or tremor. DBS is based on the delivery of electrical stimuli to specific deep anatomic structures of the central nervous system. However, the mechanisms underlying the effect of DBS remain enigmatic. This has led to an interest in investigating the impact of DBS in animal models, especially in rats. As DBS is a long-term therapy, research should be focused on molecular-genetic changes of neural circuits that occur several weeks after DBS. Long-term DBS in rats is challenging because the rats move around in their cage, which causes problems in keeping in place the wire leading from the head of the animal to the stimulator. Furthermore, target structures for stimulation in the rat brain are small and therefore electrodes cannot easily be placed at the required position. Thus, a set-up for long-lasting stimulation of rats using platinum/iridium electrodes with an impedance of about 1 MΩ was developed for this study. An electrode with these specifications allows for not only adequate stimulation but also recording of deep brain structures to identify the target area for DBS. In our set-up, an electrode with a plug for the wire was embedded in dental cement with four anchoring screws secured onto the skull. The wire from the plug to the stimulator was protected by a stainless-steel spring. A swivel was connected to the circuit to prevent the wire from becoming tangled. Overall, this stimulation set-up offers a high degree of free mobility for the rat and enables the head plug, as well as the wire connection between the plug and the stimulator, to retain long-lasting strength.

Introduction

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a treatment based on the delivery of electrical impulses via implanted electrodes to specific cerebral structures, such as the internal globus pallidus1, the subthalamic nucleus (STN)24 or the ventral intermediate thalamus5. In the last two decades, this treatment has been established as a powerful therapeutic tool for Parkinson's disease14, dystonia6 and tremor7, and is also used to modulate chronic pain7, psychiatric disorders (i.e., obsessive–compulsive disorder8, major depression9) or intractable epilepsy10,11. Furthermore, DBS might, in the future, become a treatment option for refractory arterial hypertension12 or orthostatic hypotension13.

The physiological mechanisms underlying the effects of DBS remain poorly understood. Studies in anesthetized rodents have provided insight into neural responses to high-frequency stimulation that mimic clinically applied DBS14. However, these studies not only lack behavioral corroboration of the DBS effect but also result in considerable variability depending on the stimulation parameters applied14.

To investigate more concisely the behavioral effects and underlying mechanisms of DBS in conscious rodents, a stimulation set-up is needed that fulfills specific requirements. DBS is mostly used as a long-term therapy (e.g., Parkinson's disease, chronic pain). Thus, the stimulation set-up in rodents should be designed so that the unit consists of an electrode with a plug, as well as a wire from the plug to an external stimulator; and this unit should be lightweight but unbreakable when fixed onto the skull. Furthermore, freedom of movement is indispensable for rats during stimulation over a prolonged period. The target structures of DBS are small; for example, the STN in rats has a length of 1.2 mm and a volume of 0.8 mm3,15. Therefore, electrodes must be designed such that the nucleus is not lesioned during insertion and targeting needs to be precise. As most DBS studies conducted in rodents have used landmark based stereotactic insertion of the electrode to the target structure, the error rate can be relatively high, even when using the coordinates according to Paxinos and Watson16. This results in a larger number of animals needed to reach a statistically meaningful result.

In the present study an electrode implantation technique is introduced, that targets the STN with high accuracy by using a microrecording system while advancing the electrode. In addition, a stimulation system is presented that does not only allow a high degree of mobility for the stimulated animal but also guarantees continuous stimulation via secure fixation of the stimulation wire (which is protected by a stainless-steel spring) onto the head of the rat.

Protocol

Animal experiments were approved by the University of Würzburg and the legal state authorities (Lower Franconia, approval number: 54-2531.01-102/13) and performed according to the recommendations for research in experimental stroke studies17 and the current Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments Guidelines (http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines).

1. Anesthesia

  1. Check the anesthetic system to ensure adequate amounts of supply gas (oxygen) and isoflurane for the duration of the procedure. Connect the nosecone with the incisor bar of the stereotaxic instrument and put the incisor bar on -3.3 mm.
  2. Turn on the supply gas (2 L/min). Place the rat into a box and seal the top. Turn on the isoflurane vaporizer to 3.5%.
  3. When the rat is recumbent, switch the system so that the anesthetic gas flows to the nosecone which is fixed to the incisor bar. 
  4. Remove the rat from the box chamber and shave the area between the ears and the eyes; using a cotton bud soaked with Jodosept PVP, swab the shaved area to remove any loose hair.
  5. Position the rat in the nosecone (Figure 1) and continue the anesthesia with isoflurane 2.5% in O2 (1 L/min). Check the level of anesthesia by pinching the interdigital area. If the rat is anesthetized adequately, the defensive reflexes are abolished (i.e., withdrawal of the foot).
  6. Monitor respiration and response to stimulation during procedure and adjust the vaporizer as needed.
  7. Apply vet ointment on eyes to prevent dryness while under anesthesia. Monitor and maintain body temperature at 37 ± 0.5 °C by a feedback-controlled heating system.

2. Surgery

  1. Keep the surgical field sterile during the whole surgery. Once the surgeon´s hands are sterile and the operating field is sterile, move only carefully and remember not to break sterility. This includes having also a sterile field (i.e., sterile waterproof drapes) on which one may set down instruments.
  2. Inject 0.2 ml mepivacaine subcutaneously into the center of the shaved area. Mepivacaine is a local anesthetic that has a duration of action of up to 3 hr. It will further anesthetize the surgical area. 
  3. Using a scalpel, make a midline incision starting between the ears and extending towards 2 cm. Ensure that the periosteum (shiny membrane under the skin) is also incised. Expose the skull with four clamps (Figure 2).
  4. Using a cotton bud, gently remove the periosteum until the coronal and sagittal sutures are exposed; thereafter, stanch the blood with cotton wool.
  5. Determine the coordinates of the bregma using a needle fixed at a probe holder, and then mark the tip of the needle with a black felt-tip pen. Using the anterior/posterior (AP), midline/lateral (ML) and dorsoventral (DV) drive screws, position the tip of the needle directly over the bregma.
  6. Take the AP and ML vernier scale readings: subtract 3.6 mm from the AP reading and 2.5 mm from the ML reading for electrode implantation into the right STN, or add 2.5 mm for electrode implantation into the left STN. This position will be marked by the dye of the felt-tip pen after lowering the tip of the needle to the surface of the skull.
  7. Clamp the dental drill onto the large probe holder of the stereotaxic instrument. Move the dental drill to the calculated area – i.e., the marked point on the skull. Looking through the microscope, drill a hole (diameter about 1 mm) through the skull until the dura is visible (the skull is about 1 mm thick). Retract the dura using micro-dissection forceps or a sterile needle. The dura is tough enough to destroy the tip of the electrode.
  8. Drill a hole with the dental drill in each frontal squama, and in the interparietal squama opposite to the electrode hole. Disconnect the probe holder from the stereotaxic instrument. Do not drill on a skull suture as venous vessels follow the sutures under the skull.
  9. Screw a bone screw into each of the five holes. Avoid threading the screws in too deep. For stainless-steel screws (M1.6), 2–3 turns of the screw will adequately hold the screw without putting pressure on the brain. The number of turns will depend on the pitch of the screw. Clamp the probe holder with the electrode in the micromanipulator (Figure 3).
  10. Using the AP, ML and DV drive screws, move the probe holder with the electrode until the tip is almost touching the bregma. Note the AP, ML and DV vernier scale readings at the bregma. When the readings are made, raise the electrode a few millimeters to prevent the electrode from scraping the skull during movement. To determine the coordinates of the position where the electrode has to be inserted into the hole, add 3.6 mm to the AP reading and add (or subtract) 2.5 mm to the ML reading.
  11. Using the AP and ML drive screws, move the electrode to the calculated position. At this point, the electrode tip should be situated directly over the drilled electrode hole. Then, by looking through the microscope, lower the electrode to the level of the dura (Figure 4). This level serves as zero-level in the DV direction. Thereafter, gently insert the tip of the electrode into the brain by looking through the microscope.
  12. Connect the electrode pin to the connector of the recording system. Put a Faraday cage (or substitute it with aluminum foil) over the rat in the stereotaxic instrument (Figure 5). Ground the stereotaxic instrument with the counterpoise of the room that is being worked in.
  13. Start the recording system. If available, also use a loudspeaker to obtain an acoustic signal of discharges/salves of single units during advancing the electrode.
  14. Slowly insert the electrode into the brain by recording the electric activity during advancing the electrode. At a depth of between 7.5 and 8.1 mm from the dura, the specific electric activity of the STN is usually detectable (Figure 6). The typical activity of neurons in the STN is characterized by an irregular firing pattern and a high firing rate (mean frequency: 40.9 ± 12.9 Hz)18.
  15. During the recording, reduce anesthesia as much as possible (e.g., to 0.8–1.0%); low-anesthetized animals show a clearer electric brain activity.
  16. Swab away any blood or cerebrospinal fluid that was displaced at the surface of the skull when lowering the electrode.
  17. Mix up a small amount of dental cement and apply it around the electrode and around four of the five screws using a small spatula (Figure 7). The fifth screw will be used to fix the ground wire of the plug.
  18. Disconnect the electrode pin from the electrode holder and connector of the recording system when the dental cement is fixed.
  19. Unscrew the screw that was not fixed by dental cement. Put the plug on the electrode pin. Fix the ground wire of the plug with the fifth screw (Figure 8).
  20. Mix up dental cement and apply it around the plug. As the cement thickens, mold it around the plug to form a cap. Avoid sharp edges of the dental cement that may harm the animal and remove them during hardening (Figure 9A and B).
  21. Debride wound edges and close them with a suture at the front and behind the cap. Disinfect the wound edges.
  22. Connect the head plug to the wire that is fixed on a swivel. Remove the rat from the stereotaxic instrument.
  23. Apply tramadol (12.5 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) at the end of the intervention and then once daily for 2-3 days. Place the rat in a clean cage with thermal support, fix the swivel on this cage (Figure 10) and inspect it carefully for 1 hr.
  24. Do not leave an animal unattended until it has regained sufficient consciousness to maintain sternal recumbency. Do not return an animal that has undergone surgery to the company of other animals until fully recovered.

3. Stimulation

  1. Determine the resistance in the animal before stimulation using an impedance meter.
  2. Connect the plug of the swivel with a wire and the plugs at the other end of the wire with the current output and the output for the ground wire of the stimulator. Connect the stimulator with a computer in order to program the stimulator.
  3. Choose the parameters of stimulation in the program; for example, the parameters used in Parkinson’s disease are pulse length: 60 μsec; frequency: 130 Hz. Stimulate the rat with an increasing current amplitude until dyskinesia are recognized. Reduce the electric intensity by 10–20% below the intensity that elicited dyskinesia or until neurologic signs disappear and the animal is comfortable. Monophasic rectangular pulses were used in this study.
  4. After completing the experiment, euthanize the animal with isoflurane: Adjust the isofurane flow rate or concentration to 5% or greater. Continue isoflurane exposure until 1 min after breathing stops.

Results

Implanting an electrode into the STN of a rat using a recording system – as presented here – is an effective and accurate procedure for DBS that takes approximately 1 hr per animal. This model is a fairly minor procedure: out of 10 rats subjected to surgery, all survived the intervention. Twenty-four hr after intervention, the state of each rat was monitored and no animal achieved more than 1 of 3 points according to the severity code. During the period of continuous stimulation (14 days, 24 hr a day), no wir...

Discussion

This study presents a step-by-step set of instructions for implanting a monopolar chronic electrode into the STN of rats. Although tungsten electrodes with low impedance are often used for DBS18,19, a monopolar electrode made of platinum/iridium (Pt/Ir) was employed that had an impedance of about 1 MΩ. Pt/Ir electrodes are also used in patients with Parkinson’s disease because of their favorable properties: they demonstrate minimal erosion20 and do not produce relevant tissue damage2...

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Mr Wabbel for preparing the wires and Mr Tietsch for constructing the plugs and cages according to our plans. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Sonderforschungsbereich 688). Felix Fluri holds a fellowship of the Interdisziplinäre Zentrum für Klinische Forschung (IZKF), University Clinics Würzburg, Germany.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Pt/Ir electrodeFHC Inc.UECustom-made: Specification: UEPSEGSECN1M
PlugsGT Labortechnik (Arnstein/Germany)Custom-made
Pin headerDISTRELEC143-95-324single-row, 90° 1x3 datamate, Type M80-8420342
SocketDISTRELEC143-95-621single-row,straight 2 mm pole no.1x3 datamate, Type M80-8400342
Stainless steel springPlastics ONESS0102Part-#: .120 X .156 Spring ID (mm): 3.0  Spring OD (mm): 4.0
Dental cement/PaladurHeraeus Kulzer64707938Liquid, 500 ml
Dental cement/PaladurHeraeus Kulzer64707954Powder, rose, 500g
Head screwHummer & ReissV2ADIN84 M1.6x3
Jodosept PVPVetoquinol435678/E04
Mepivacain 1%AstraZenecaPZN03338515
EpinephrineSanofi-AventisPZN00176118
TramadolhydrochlorideRotexmedica38449.00.00

References

  1. Kumar, R., Lang, A. E., et al. Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus pars interna in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 55 (12 Suppl 6), S34-S39 (2000).
  2. Volkmann, J., Allert, N., Voges, J., Weiss, P. H., Freund, H. -. J., Sturm, V. Safety and efficacy of pallidal or subthalamic nucleus stimulation in advanced PD. Neurology. 56 (4), 548-551 (2001).
  3. Volkmann, J., Allert, N., Voges, J., Sturm, V., Schnitzler, A., Freund, H. -. J. Long-term results of bilateral pallidal stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Annals of Neurology. 55 (6), 871-875 (2004).
  4. Odekerken, V. J., van Laar, T., et al. Subthalamic nucleus versus globus pallidus bilateral deep brain stimulation for advanced Parkinson’s disease (NSTAPS study): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Neurology. 12 (1), 37-44 (2013).
  5. Benabid, A. L., Pollak, P., et al. Long-term suppression of tremor by chronic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus. The Lancet. 337 (8738), 403-406 (1991).
  6. Volkmann, J., Wolters, A., et al. Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with primary generalised or segmental dystonia: 5-year follow-up of a randomised trial. The Lancet Neurology. 11 (12), 1029-1038 (2012).
  7. Nguyen, J. -. P., Nizard, J., Keravel, Y., Lefaucheur, J. -. P. Invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic pain. Nature Reviews Neurology. 7 (12), 699-709 (2011).
  8. Kohl, S., Schönherr, D. M., et al. Deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory obsessive compulsive disorder: a systematic review. BMC psychiatry. 14, 214 (2014).
  9. Schlaepfer, T. E., Bewernick, B. H., Kayser, S., Mädler, B., Coenen, V. A. Rapid Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Major Depression. Biological Psychiatry. 73 (12), 1204-1212 (2013).
  10. Fisher, R., Salanova, V., et al. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 51 (5), 899-908 (2010).
  11. DeGiorgio, C., Heck, C., et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: Randomized comparison of three stimulation paradigms. Neurology. 65 (2), 317-319 (2005).
  12. Callaghan, E. L., McBryde, F. D., et al. Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension. Current Hypertension Reports. 16 (11), 1-10 (2014).
  13. Green, A. L. M. R. C. S., Wang, S., Owen, S. L. F., Paterson, D. J. D. P., Stein, J. F. D., Aziz, T. Z. D. M. Controlling the Heart Via the Brain: A Potential New Therapy for Orthostatic Hypotension. [Miscellaneous Article]. Neurosurgery June 2006. 58 (6), 1176-1183 (2006).
  14. Chang, J. -. Y., Shi, L. -. H., Luo, F., Zhang, W. -. M., Woodward, D. J. Studies of the neural mechanisms of deep brain stimulation in rodent models of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience, & Biobehavioral Reviews. 32 (3), 352-366 (2008).
  15. Hardman, C. D., Henderson, J. M., Finkelstein, D. I., Horne, M. K., Paxinos, G., Halliday, G. M. Comparison of the basal ganglia in rats, marmosets, macaques, baboons, and humans: Volume and neuronal number for the output, internal relay, and striatal modulating nuclei. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 445 (3), 238-255 (2002).
  16. Paxinos, G., Watson, C. H. . The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. , (2007).
  17. Dirnagl, U. Bench to bedside: the quest for quality in experimental stroke research. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow, & Metabolism. 26 (12), 1465-1478 (2006).
  18. Maesawa, S., Kaneoke, Y., et al. Long-term stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in hemiparkinsonian rats: neuroprotection of dopaminergic neurons. Journal of Neurosurgery. 100 (4), 679-687 (2004).
  19. Spieles-Engemann, A. L., Behbehani, M. M., et al. Stimulation of the rat subthalamic nucleus is neuroprotective following significant nigral dopamine neuron loss. Neurobiology of disease. 39 (1), 105-115 (2010).
  20. Agnew, W. F., Yuen, T. G. H., McCreery, D. B., Bullara, L. A. Histopathologic evaluation of prolonged intracortical electrical stimulation. Experimental Neurology. 92 (1), 162-185 (1986).
  21. Harnack, D., Winter, C., Meissner, W., Reum, T., Kupsch, A., Morgenstern, R. The effects of electrode material, charge density and stimulation duration on the safety of high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in rats. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 138 (1-2), 207-216 (2004).
  22. Groothuis, J., Ramsey, N. F., Ramakers, G. M. J., van der Plasse, G. Physiological Challenges for Intracortical Electrodes. Brain Stimulation. 7 (1), 1-6 (2014).
  23. Li, Q., Ke, Y., et al. Therapeutic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinsonian Rats Directly Influences Motor Cortex. Neuron. 76 (5), 1030-1041 (2012).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Keywords Deep Brain StimulationDBSSubthalamic NucleusRat ModelMicroelectrode ImplantationLong term StimulationParkinson s DiseaseNeurological DisordersNeural CircuitsElectrode DesignDental CementAnchoring ScrewsStainless steel SpringSwivel

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved