JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Here, we present a protocol to design and fabricate a zebrafish embryo arraying template, followed by a detailed procedure on the use of such template for high throughput zebrafish embryo arraying into a 96-well plate.

Abstract

The zebrafish is a globally recognized fresh water organism frequently used in developmental biology, environmental toxicology, and human disease related research fields. Thanks to its unique features, including large fecundity, embryo translucency, rapid and simultaneous development, etc., zebrafish embryos are often used for large scale toxicity assessment of chemicals and drug/compound screening. A typical screening procedure involves adult zebrafish spawning, embryos selection, and arraying the embryos into multi-well plates. From there, embryos are subjected to exposure and the toxicity of chemical, or the effectiveness of the drugs/compounds can be evaluated relatively quickly based on phenotypic observations. Among these processes, embryos arraying is one of the most time-consuming and labor-intensive steps that limits the throughput level. In this protocol, we present an innovative approach that makes use of a 3D-printed arraying template coupled with vacuum manipulation to speed up this laborious step. The protocol herein describes the overall design of the arraying template, a detailed experimental setup and step-by-step procedure, followed by representative results. When implemented, this approach should prove beneficial in a variety of research applications using zebrafish embryos as testing subjects.

Introduction

As a popular model organism, zebrafish is widely used in the fields of medicine and toxicology1,2,3,4. Compared to in vitro platforms, zebrafish offer much greater biological complexities that one or two cell types could not offer. Besides being a whole organism model, the zebrafish's large fecundity, rapid and simultaneous embryonic development, and high organ translucency have given this model unique advantages to be used for large scale toxicity or drugs/compound screening5. The hundreds of embryos produced by one pair of adult zebrafish each week surpass any other whole animal models and have made it suitable for high throughput screening.

A typical screening procedure using zebrafish involves a significant amount of manual work, such as adult zebrafish spawning, embryo selection, and arraying embryos into suitable containers where they are subjected to exposure through water immersion. The development of the embryos is monitored and observable endpoints such as mortality, hatchability and abnormality are often evaluated manually and used as the preliminary identifications of the toxicity of chemicals or indications of the effectiveness of drugs or compounds. To speed up the screening procedure, approaches such as automated imaging and computer-assisted image analysis have been explored previously. For example, microscopes with high content imaging capabilities have been adapted to perform automated bright-field or fluorescence imaging on zebrafish embryos at various developmental stages from 96/384 well plates6. Microfluidic devices coupled with microscopes were used to position zebrafish larvae through current manipulation for imaging of brain neurons7. These approaches could significantly improve the efficiency of image acquisitions compared to traditional manual operation. Moreover, with large number of images being generated, image analysis tools have also been developed to speed up the data processing, as demonstrated by Liu et al. and Tu et al.8,9.

As the throughput level of imaging and image analysis increases, it became clear that the rate-limiting step for screening lies in the process of preparing zebrafish embryos for exposure, which typically means arraying them into 96- or 384-well plates. To solve this bottleneck step, vision-guided robotics were developed by Mandrell et al.10 and us11 previously to replace manual handling but the instruments were rather sophisticated and there is a deep learning curve to implement such techniques. Therefore, to provide an easy-to-use approach becomes one important factor to further improve the throughput level of zebrafish screening and is the main objective of this work.

In this work, we designed and fabricated an embryo arraying template by 3D printing. Such an arraying template was designed to entrap zebrafish embryo into wells that fit with a standard 96-well plate. Instead of selecting embryos and arraying them into individual well one by one, one could perform embryo entrapment and array all 96 embryos into a multiwall plate at once. Using this template and the following protocol, one could significantly increase the efficiency of arraying embryos into multiwall plates, which would in term boost the screening capacity at least tenfold, compared to manual operation. The protocol described below includes an overall design for the arraying template, zebrafish spawning, embryo collection, and arraying. Figure 1 shows the overall design of the arraying template. Figure 2 shows an overview of the step-by-step protocol on using the template described in Parts 3 and 4.

Protocol

1. Design and Fabrication of a Zebrafish Embryos Arraying Template

  1. Design the arraying template with a 12 by 8, 96-well layout that fits a standard 96-well plate. Use the dimensions listed in Figure 1A for the upper embryo entrapment chamber (see also the Supplemental File).
    1. Use the dimensions shown in Figure 1B and 1D for the entrapment well.
    2. Use the dimensions in Figure 1C for the bottom vacuum chamber.
    3. Use the dimensions in Figure 1B for the air in/outlet.
  2. Use a 3D-printer (with 0.1 mm precision) to print the template; see Table of Materials for recommended resin to be used for printing.
    NOTE: 3D printers with a 0.1 mm precision are recommended for fabrication of the arraying template (see Table of Materials). The suggested color for the surface of the template is dark grey or black.

2. Zebrafish Embryo Spawning

  1. Place two pairs of male and female fish per mating box one day prior to spawning. Separate males and females by a clear plastic divider.
  2. Take off the dividers in the morning to mix male and female fish.
  3. Remove the male and female fish and collect zebrafish embryos using a fine-mesh strainer. Wash the embryos with 250 mL egg water (see Table of Materials).
  4. Transfer the collected embryos to petri dishes (90 mm in diameter) with Holtfreter's solution (see Table of Materials) and remove dead and unfertilized embryos using a stereomicroscope.
  5. Place the embryos in a 28.5 °C incubator. At 4 h post fertilization (hpf), observe the embryos and remove any dead and unhealthy embryos. The embryos are now ready for the next step.

3. Preparation of Arraying Template

  1. Wash the template 2–3 times with 500 mL deionized water and put it into the drying oven (45 °C) for 5 min.
  2. Tape the bottom chamber with a piece of sealing film (Figure 2, Step 1).
  3. Connect a vacuum pump through the air outlet at the bottom of the template.
    NOTE: The recommended max vacuum for the vacuum pump is 0.1 Mpa. Be aware of the strength of the vacuum used. If the negative pressure is too strong, cut a cross-shaped hole on the sealing film to lower the pressure.

4. Arraying Zebrafish Embryos into a 96-well plate

  1. Using a plastic transfer pipette, place approximately 150 embryos into the template, as demonstrated in Figure 2, Step 2.
  2. Connect the vacuum pump to the air outlet to generate negative pressure in the chamber sealed by the sealing film in step 3.3.
  3. Shake the entire template horizontally until each well has one embryo entrapped (Figure 2, Step 3).
    NOTE: If the Holtfreter's Solution dries up before the embryos are trapped in each well, add additional Holtfreter's Solution in the entrapment chamber and repeat this step.
  4. Discard extra Holtfreter's Solution and embryos that are not entrapped in the wells (Figure 2, Step 4).
  5. Turn off and disconnect the vacuum pump.
  6. Place a standard 96-well plate upside down against the template (Figure 2, Step 5) and rotate both at the same time (Figure 2, Step 6).
  7. Tap the bottom of the template or connect the air outlet to a compressed gas dusting can to transfer all trapped embryos from the template to the 96-well plate (Figure 2, Step 6).
  8. Repeat step 4.1 to 4.8 to prepare additional multi-well plates.
  9. Remove the sealing film and wash the template 3 times from top to bottom with 500 mL deionized water for future use.
    NOTE: Do not use any organic solvents, like ethanol, to clean the template.

Results

Figure 3 shows a typical 3D-printed arraying template. This template uses photosensitive resin as raw material and was made by a 3D printer; a layer of black paint was applied to provide a better contrast to the color of embryos. The position of 96 wells (12 by 8) was designed to fit with a standard 96-well plate. Similarly, a 384 (24 by 16) well template could also be designed and fabricated using the same method. The upside chamber was slightly bigger than ...

Discussion

There are two critical steps in this protocol that require close attention for a successful implementation of 3D-printed template for arraying zebrafish embryos.

The most important factor on the design of the arraying template is the entrapment well. To makes sure there is only one embryo trapped in each well, one should pay close attention to the diameter and the depth of the entrapment well, and the diameter of the through hole. The recommended diameter is within 1.5 to 2 times of the diamet...

Disclosures

The authors have filled a patent on the described 3D-printed template.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the "1000plan Youth" program, the Startup Funds from Tongji University, and NSFC Grant# 21607115 and 21777116 (Lin).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Zebrafish FacilityShanghai Haisheng Biotech Co., Ltd.Z-A-S5
Mating boxShanghai Haisheng Biotech Co., Ltd.
Wash Bottle, 500 mlSangon BiotechF505001-0001
Sodium chlorideVetecV900058-500G
Potassium ChlorideSinopharm Chemical Reagent Co.,Ltd10016318
Calcium chlorideSinopharm Chemical Reagent Co.,Ltd20011160
Sodium bicarbonate Vetecv900182-500G
Methylene Blue HydrateTCIM0501
Hydrochloric acidSinopharm Chemical Reagent Co.,Ltd10011008
Sea SaltsInstant OceanSS15-10
PipetterFisherbrand13-675M
Controlled Drop Pasteur PipetFisherbrand13-678-30
MicroscopeOLYMPUSSZ61
Biochemical incubatorShanghai Yiheng Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd.LRH-250
3D printerUnionTechLite600
Photosensitive resinUnionTechUTR9000
Vacuum pumpShanghai Yukang Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd.SHB-IIIA
Adhesive PCR Plate SealsSolarbioYA0245
96 well plateCostar3599
Multi 8-channel pipette 30 - 300 μlEppendorf3122000.051
Compressed Gas DusterShanghai Zhantu Chemical Co., Ltd.ST1005
DI WaterThermoGenPure Pro UV/UF
Drying ovenShanghai Yiheng Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd.BPG-9106A
System waterWater out of the facility’s water system
Egg waterDilute 60mg “Instant Ocean” sea salts and 0.25 mg/L methylene blue in 1 L DI water
Holtfreter’s solutionDissolve 7.0 g Sodium chloride (NaCl), 0.4 g Sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), 0.1 g Potassium Chloride (KCl), 0.235 g Calcium chloride (CaCl2.2H2O) in 1.9 L DI water. Adjust pH to 7 using HCl and adjust volume to 2 L using Di water

References

  1. Howe, K., et al. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature. 496 (7446), 498-503 (2013).
  2. Leslie, M. Zebrafish larvae could help to personalize cancer treatments. Science. 357 (6353), 745-745 (2017).
  3. Lin, S., et al. Understanding the Transformation, Speciation, and Hazard Potential of Copper Particles in a Model Septic Tank System Using Zebrafish to Monitor the Effluent. ACS Nano. 9 (2), 2038-2048 (2015).
  4. Lin, S., et al. Aspect ratio plays a role in the hazard potential of ceo2 nanoparticles in mouse lung and zebrafish gastrointestinal tract. ACS Nano. 8 (5), 4450-4464 (2014).
  5. Baraban, S. C., Dinday, M. T., Hortopan, G. A. Drug screening in Scn1a zebrafish mutant identifies clemizole as a potential Dravet syndrome treatment. Nature Communications. 4, (2013).
  6. Lin, S., et al. High content screening in zebrafish speeds up hazard ranking of transition metal oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 5 (9), 7284-7295 (2011).
  7. Kuipers, J., Kalicharan, R. D., Wolters, A. H. G., van Ham, T. J., Giepmans, B. N. G. Large-scale Scanning Transmission electron microscopy (nanotomy) of healthy and injured zebrafish brain. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (111), (2016).
  8. Liu, R., et al. Automated Phenotype Recognition for Zebrafish Embryo Based In vivo High Throughput Toxicity Screening of Engineered Nano-Materials. PLoS One. 7 (4), (2012).
  9. Tu, X., et al. Automatic Categorization and Scoring of Solid, Part-Solid and Non-Solid Pulmonary Nodules. in CT Images with Convolutional Neural Network. Scientific Reports. 7, 8533 (2017).
  10. Mandrell, D., et al. Automated zebrafish chorion removal and single embryo placement: optimizing throughput of zebrafish developmental toxicity screens. Journal of Laboratory Automation. 17 (1), 66-74 (2012).
  11. Lin, S., Zhao, Y., Nel, A. E., Lin, S. Zebrafish: An in vivo model for nano EHS studies. Small. 9 (9-10), 1608-1618 (2013).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

3D printed TemplateHigh ThroughputZebrafish EmbryoArrayingAutomationZebrafish Screening96 well Plate384 well PlateEmbryo EntrapmentVacuum based ArrayingTemplate Design3D PrintingZebrafish SpawningEmbryo CollectionEmbryo Selection

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved