A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
Large genetic screens in model organisms have led to the identification of negative genetic interactions. Here, we describe a data integration workflow using data from genetic screens in model organisms to delineate drug combinations targeting synthetic lethal interactions in cancer.
A synthetic lethal interaction between two genes is given when knock-out of either one of the two genes does not affect cell viability but knock-out of both synthetic lethal interactors leads to loss of cell viability or cell death. The best studied synthetic lethal interaction is between BRCA1/2 and PARP1, with PARP1 inhibitors being used in clinical practice to treat patients with BRCA1/2 mutated tumors. Large genetic screens in model organisms but also in haploid human cell lines have led to the identification of numerous additional synthetic lethal interaction pairs, all being potential targets of interest in the development of novel tumor therapies. One approach is to therapeutically target genes with a synthetic lethal interactor that is mutated or significantly downregulated in the tumor of interest. A second approach is to formulate drug combinations addressing synthetic lethal interactions. In this article, we outline a data integration workflow to evaluate and identify drug combinations targeting synthetic lethal interactions. We make use of available datasets on synthetic lethal interaction pairs, homology mapping resources, drug-target links from dedicated databases, as well as information on drugs being investigated in clinical trials in the disease area of interest. We further highlight key findings of two recent studies of our group on drug combination assessment in the context of ovarian and breast cancer.
Synthetic lethality defines an association of two genes, where loss of one gene does not affect viability, but loss of both genes leads to cell death. It was first described in 1946 by Dobzhansky while analyzing various phenotypes of drosophila by breeding homozygous mutants1. Mutants that did not produce viable offspring, although viable themselves, exhibited lethal phenotypes when crossed with certain other mutants, setting ground for the establishment of the theory of synthetic lethality. Hartwell and colleagues suggested that this concept might be applicable for cancer therapy in humans2. Pharmacologically provoked synthetic lethality could rely on just one mutation, given that the mutated gene’s synthetic lethal partner is targetable by a pharmacological compound. The first gene pair to enable pharmacological induction of synthetic lethality was BRCA(1/2) and PARP1. PARP1 functions as a sensor for DNA damage, and is tied to sites of double and single DNA strand-breaks, supercoils and crossovers3. BRCA1 and 2 play major roles in repair of DNA double-strand breaks through homologous recombination4. Farmer and colleagues published findings that cells deficient for BRCA1/2 were susceptible to PARP inhibition, while no cytotoxicity was observed in BRCA wild-type cells5. Ultimately, PARP inhibitors were approved for the treatment of BRCA deficient breast and ovarian cancer6,7. Further, synthetic lethality gene pairs leading to clinical approval of pharmacological compounds are much anticipated and a major area of recent cancer research efforts8.
Synthetic lethal gene interactions were modelled in multiple organisms including fruit flies, C. elegans and yeast2. Using various approaches including RNA-interference- and CRISPR/CAS-library knockouts, novel synthetic lethal gene pairs were discovered in recent years9,10,11. A protocol on the experimental procedures of RNAi in combination with CRISPR/CAS was recently published by Housden and colleagues12. Meanwhile, researchers also conducted large screens in haploid human cells to identify synthetic lethal interactions13,14. In silico methods like biological network analysis and machine learning have also shown promise in the discovery of synthetic lethal interactions15,16.
Conceptionally, one approach to make use of synthetic lethal interactions in the context of anti-tumor therapy is to identify mutated or non-functional proteins in tumor cells, making their synthetic lethal interaction partners promising drug targets for therapeutic intervention. Due to the heterogeneity of most tumor types, researchers have started the search for so-called synthetic lethal hub proteins. These synthetic lethal hubs have a number of synthetic lethal interaction partners that are either mutated and therefore non-functional or significantly downregulated in tumor samples. Addressing such synthetic lethal hubs holds promise in increasing drug efficacy or overcoming drug resistance as could be shown for instance in the context of vincristine resistant neuroblastoma17. A second approach to enhance drug treatment making use of the concept of synthetic lethal interactions is to identify drug combinations targeting synthetic lethal interactions. This could lead to new combinations of already approved single anti-tumor therapies and to the repositioning of drugs from other disease areas to the field of oncology.
In this article, we present a step-by-step procedure to yield a list of drug combinations that target synthetic lethal interaction pairs. In this workflow, we (i) use data on synthetic lethal interactions from BioGRID and (ii) information on homologous genes from Ensembl, (iii) retrieve drug-target pairs from DrugBank, (iv) build disease-drug associations from ClinicalTrials.gov, and (v) hence generate a set of drug combinations addressing synthetic lethal interactions. Lastly, we provide drug combinations in the context of ovarian and breast cancer in the representative results section.
1. Retrieving synthetic lethal gene pairs
Column number | Column header name |
3 | Gene Name |
12 | Species |
13 | Drug IDs |
Table 1: Relevant columns of the BioGRID datafile.
2. Translating synthetic lethal gene pairs to human orthologs
3. Mapping synthetic lethal interaction partners to drugs
Column number | Column header name |
3 | Gene Name |
12 | Species |
13 | Drug IDs |
4. Establishing the set of currently tested drug combinations in clinical trials
5. Identification of drug combinations targeting synthetic lethal interactions
6. Testing selected new drug combinations in vitro
Our group has recently published two studies applying the workflow depicted in this manuscript to identify drug combinations targeting synthetic lethal interactions in the context of ovarian and breast cancer24,25. In the first study, we evaluated drug combinations that are currently tested in late stage clinical trials (phase III and IV) or already being used in clinical practice to treat ovarian cancer patients regarding their impact on synthetic lethal interac...
We have outlined a workflow to identify drug combinations impacting synthetic lethal interactions. This workflow makes use of (i) data on synthetic lethal interactions from model organisms, (ii) information of human orthologs, (iii) information on drug-target associations, (iv) drug information on clinical trials in the context of cancer, as well as (v) on information of drug-disease and gene-disease associations extracted from scientific literature. The consolidated information can be used to evaluate the impact of a gi...
AH and PP were employees of emergentec biodevelopment GmbH at the time of performing the analyses leading to the results presented in the representative results section. MM and MK have nothing to disclose.
Funding for developing the data integration workflow was obtained from European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement nu. 279113 (OCTIPS). Adaption of data within this publication was kindly approved by Public Library of Sciences Publications and Impact Journals, LLC.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
BioGRID | n/a | n/a | thebiogrid.org |
ClinicalTrials.gov | n/a | n/a | ClinicalTrials.gov |
DrugBank | n/a | n/a | drugbank.ca |
Ensembl BioMart | n/a | n/a | ensembl.org |
for alternative computational databases please refer to the manuscript | |||
7-AAD | ebioscience | 00-6993-50 | |
AnnexinV-APC | BD Bioscience | 550474 | |
celecoxib | Sigma-Aldrich | PZ0008-25MG | |
CellTiter-Blue Viability Assay | Promega | G8080 | |
FACS Canto II | BD Bioscience | n/a | |
fetal bovine serum | Fisher Scientific/Gibco | 16000044 | |
FloJo Software | FloJo LLC | V10 | |
McCoy's 5a Medium Modified | Fisher Scientific/Gibco | 16600082 | |
penicillin G/streptomycin sulfate | Fisher Scientific/Gibco | 15140122 | |
SKBR-3 cells | American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) | ATCC HTB-30 | |
zoledronic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | SML0223-50MG | |
further materials or equipment will be made available upon request |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved