Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Representative Results
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Microscale thermophoresis obtains binding constants quickly at low material cost. Either labeled or label free microscale thermophoresis is commercially available; however, label free thermophoresis is not capable of the diversity of interaction measurements that can be performed using fluorescent labels. We provide a protocol for labeled thermophoresis measurements.

Abstract

The ability to determine the binding affinity of lipids to proteins is an essential part of understanding protein-lipid interactions in membrane trafficking, signal transduction and cytoskeletal remodeling. Classic tools for measuring such interactions include surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). While powerful tools, these approaches have setbacks. ITC requires large amounts of purified protein as well as lipids, which can be costly and difficult to produce. Furthermore, ITC as well as SPR are very time consuming, which could add significantly to the cost of performing these experiments. One way to bypass these restrictions is to use the relatively new technique of microscale thermophoresis (MST). MST is fast and cost effective using small amounts of sample to obtain a saturation curve for a given binding event. There currently are two types of MST systems available. One type of MST requires labeling with a fluorophore in the blue or red spectrum. The second system relies on the intrinsic fluorescence of aromatic amino acids in the UV range. Both systems detect the movement of molecules in response to localized induction of heat from an infrared laser. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages. Label-free MST can use untagged native proteins; however, many analytes, including pharmaceuticals, fluoresce in the UV range, which can interfere with determination of accurate KD values. In comparison, labeled MST allows for a greater diversity of measurable pairwise interactions utilizing fluorescently labeled probes attached to ligands with measurable absorbances in the visible range as opposed to UV, limiting the potential for interfering signals from analytes.

Introduction

Microscale thermophoresis is a relatively new technique in determining disassociation constants (KD) as well as inhibition constants (IC50) between biochemically relevant ligands. The leading commercial retailer for MST (e.g., NanoTemper) offers two popular MST technologies: 1) Label free MST requiring a fluorescent tag, and 2) labeled thermophoresis using the inherent fluorescence of proteins dependent on the number of aromatic residues present in each protein1. A disadvantage of label-free thermophoresis is that in most cases, it does not allow for the measurement of protein-protein interactions. Howeve....

Protocol

1. Preparation of materials

  1. Prepare phosphate buffered saline (PBS): 137 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4, and 2 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.41.
  2. Prepare NTA-Atto 647 N dye. Dilute stock NTA-Atto 647 N dye to 100 nM from a 100% DMSO solution into PBS without Tween.
  3. Express Vam7-His8 – Protein as a fusion protein in E. coli and purify using Ni-NTA and size exclusion chromatography8.
  4. Tit.......

Representative Results

This is a sample output using the affinity analysis. The labeled MST was used to determine the binding constant of the Vam7-His8 to the soluble dioctanoyl (DiC8) PA of one of its natural substrates9. Figure 1 presents the thermophoretic traces from one trial of a 1:1 titration of DiC8 PA starting at 500 μM against 50 nM of Vam7-His8. Initial fluorescence (time before infrared laser turned on), Tjump (time initially after infrared laser turned on), and thermo.......

Discussion

The determination of Vam7-His8binding to DiC8-PA provided a robust fitted KD for the given interaction, which is slightly lower affinity than the measured KD of Vam7-His8 to PA liposomes (unpublished). This difference is most likely due to the lack of a membrane, which generally results in lower affinity for membrane specific lipid binding interactions and therefore demonstrates the role for the liposome membrane scaffold to this interaction

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from National Science Foundation (MCB 1818310) to RAF. This work was supported in part by the Chemical Biology Core Facility/Protein Crystallography Unit at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center (NIH/NCI: P30-CA076292).

....

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Cy5 Maleimide Mono-Reactive DyeGE HealthcarePA23031For protein labeleing
Graphpad PrsimGraphpad software
Monolith NT.115 Capillaries (1000 count)NanotemperMO-K022Capillaries for MST
Monolith NT.115 machineNanotemperUniversity equipment
NTA-Atto 647 NSigma2175label for His tags
Phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate diC8 (PI(3)P diC8)EchelonP-3008Lipid for binding experiments

References

  1. Jerabek-Willemsen, M., et al. MicroScale Thermophoresis: Interaction analysis and beyond. Journal of Molecular Structure. 1077, 101-113 (2014).
  2. Chapman, D., Hochstrasser, R., Millar, D., Youderia, n. P.

Explore More Articles

Microscale ThermophoresisProtein lipid InteractionsVam7Phosphatidic AcidDisassociation Constant KDBiochemical InteractionsNTA Atto 647 DyeThermophoretic Traces1 1 TitrationDiC8 PAPharmaceutical Development

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved