Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Representative Results
  • Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This study outlines the necessary tools for utilizing low-dose three-dimensional cone beam-based patient images of the maxilla and maxillary teeth to obtain finite element models. These patient models are then used to accurately locate the CRES of all the maxillary teeth.

Abstract

The center of resistance (CRES) is regarded as the fundamental reference point for predictable tooth movement. The methods used to estimate the CRES of teeth range from traditional radiographic and physical measurements to in vitro analysis on models or cadaver specimens. Techniques involving finite element analysis of high-dose micro-CT scans of models and single teeth have shown a lot of promise, but little has been done with newer, low-dose, and low resolution cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Also, the CRES for only a few select teeth (i.e., maxillary central incisor, canine, and first molar) have been described; the rest have been largely ignored. There is also a need to describe the methodology of determining the CRES in detail, so that it becomes easy to replicate and build upon.

This study used routine CBCT patient images for developing tools and a workflow to obtain finite element models for locating the CRES of maxillary teeth. The CBCT volume images were manipulated to extract three-dimensional (3D) biological structures relevant in determining the CRES of the maxillary teeth by segmentation. The segmented objects were cleaned and converted into a virtual mesh made up tetrahedral (tet4) triangles having a maximum edge length of 1 mm with 3matic software. The models were further converted into a solid volumetric mesh of tetrahedrons with a maximum edge length of 1 mm for use in finite element analysis. The engineering software, Abaqus, was used to preprocess the models to create an assembly and set material properties, interaction conditions, boundary conditions, and load applications. The loads, when analyzed, simulated the stresses and strains on the system, aiding in locating the CRES. This study is the first step in accurate prediction of tooth movement.

Introduction

The center of resistance (CRES) of a tooth or segment of teeth is analogous to the center of mass of a free body. It is a term borrowed from the field of mechanics of rigid bodies. When a single force is applied at the CRES, translation of the tooth in the direction of the line of action of the force occurs1,2. The position of the CRES depends not only on the tooth's anatomy and properties but also on its environment (e.g., periodontal ligament, surrounding bone, adjacent teeth). The tooth is a restrained body, making its CRES similar to the center of mass of a f....

Protocol

An institutional review board exemption was obtained for evaluating CBCT volumes archived in the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (IRB No. 17-071S-2).

1. Volume selection and criteria

  1. Acquire a CBCT image of the head and face16.
  2. Examine the image for tooth alignment, missing teeth, voxel size, field of view, and overall quality of the image.
  3. Make sure the voxel size is not larger than 350 µm (0.35 mm).

Representative Results

In order to verify segmentation and manual outlining as described in the Procedures section (step 2), a maxillary first molar was extracted from a dry skull, and a CBCT image was taken. The image processing and editing software Mimics was used for manually outlining the tooth as described in step 2. Subsequently, meshing was performed, the segmented models were cleaned with 3matic software, and they were imported to Abaqus for analysis. We did not find any significant difference in the li.......

Discussion

This study shows a set of tools to establish a consistent workflow for finite element analysis (FEA) of models of maxillary teeth derived from CBCT images of patients to determine their CRES. For the clinician, a clear and straightforward map of the CRES of the maxillary teeth would be an invaluable clinical tool to plan tooth movements and predict side effects. The finite element method (FEM) was introduced in dental biomechanical research in 197317, and since then has been .......

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Charles Burstone Foundation Award for supporting the project.

....

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
3-matic softwareMaterialise, Leuven, Belgium.Cleaning and meshing
Abaqus/CAE software, version 2017Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Johnston, RI, USA.Finite Element Analysis
Mimics software, version 17.0Materialise, Leuven, Belgium.Segmentation of teeth and bone

References

  1. Smith, R. J., Burstone, C. J. Mechanics of tooth movement. American Journal of Orthodontics. 85 (4), 294-307 (1984).
  2. Christiansen, R. L., Burstone, C. J. Centers of rotation within the periodontal space. American Journal of Orthodontics....

Explore More Articles

Finite Element ApproachCenter Of ResistanceMaxillary Teeth3D LocationCBCT Image SegmentationTooth MovementMulti bracket AssemblyData OptimizationCurve ModuleSurface CleaningMeshing

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2024 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved