A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Here we describe a method to visualize synaptogenesis of granule neurons in the mouse cerebellum over the time course of postnatal brain development when these cells refine their synaptic structures and form synapses to integrate themselves into the overall brain circuit.
Neurons undergo dynamic changes in their structure and function during brain development to form appropriate connections with other cells. The rodent cerebellum is an ideal system to track the development and morphogenesis of a single cell type, the cerebellar granule neuron (CGN), across time. Here, in vivo electroporation of granule neuron progenitors in the developing mouse cerebellum was employed to sparsely label cells for subsequent morphological analyses. The efficacy of this technique is demonstrated in its ability to showcase key developmental stages of CGN maturation, with a specific focus on the formation of dendritic claws, which are specialized structures where these cells receive the majority of their synaptic inputs. In addition to providing snapshots of CGN synaptic structures throughout cerebellar development, this technique can be adapted to genetically manipulate granule neurons in a cell-autonomous manner to study the role of any gene of interest and its effect on CGN morphology, claw development, and synaptogenesis.
Brain development is a prolonged process that extends from embryogenesis into postnatal life. During this time, the brain integrates a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic stimuli that sculpt the wiring of synapses between dendrites and axons to ultimately guide behavior. The rodent cerebellum is an ideal model system to study how synapses develop because the development of a single neuron type, the cerebellar granule neuron (CGN), can be tracked as it transitions from a progenitor cell to a mature neuron. This is due, in part, to the fact that a majority of the cerebellar cortex develops postnatally, which allows for easy genetic manipulation and cell labeling after birth1.
In mammals, CGN differentiation begins at the end of embryonic development when a subset of proliferative cells in the hindbrain migrates over the rhombic lip to form a secondary germinal zone on the surface of the cerebellum2,3,4. Although they are fully committed to a granule neuron progenitor (GNP) identity, these cells continue to proliferate within the outer portion of the external granule layer (EGL) until postnatal day 14 (P14). Proliferation of this layer results in a massive expansion of the cerebellum as these cells give rise exclusively to CGNs5. Once newborn CGNs exit the cell cycle in the EGL, they migrate inwards towards the internal granule layer (IGL), leaving behind an axon that will bifurcate and travel in the molecular layer of the cerebellum, forming parallel fibers that synapse onto Purkinje cells6. The position of these fibers within the molecular layer is dependent on the timing of cell-cycle exit.
CGNs that differentiate first leave their parallel fibers towards the bottom of the molecular layer, whereas the axons of CGNs that differentiate later are clustered at the top7,8. Once the CGN cell bodies reach the IGL, they begin to elaborate dendrites and form synapses with nearby inhibitory and excitatory neurons. The mature dendritic tree of a CGN exhibits a stereotyped architecture with four main processes. Over the course of CGN maturation, the structures at the end of these dendrites form a claw that becomes enriched with postsynaptic proteins9,10. These specialized structures, called dendritic claws, contain the majority of the synapses onto granule neurons and are important for receiving both excitatory inputs from mossy fiber innervations originating from the pons, as well as inhibitory inputs from local Golgi cells. Once fully configured, the synaptic connections of CGNs allow these cells to relay inputs from pre-cerebellar nuclei to Purkinje cells, which project out of the cerebellar cortex to the deep cerebellar nuclei.
In vivo postnatal electroporation of GNPs is advantageous over other labeling-based methods, such as viral infection and generation of transgenic mouse lines, because the expression of desired constructs can be achieved on a fast timeline, and the method targets a small population of cells, useful in studying cell-autonomous effects. This method has been used in prior studies to study morphological development of CGNs; however, these studies have focused on either a single time point or a short window of time9,10,11,12,13. This labeling method was paired with image analysis to document the changes in CGN morphology that occur across the entire time course of CGN differentiation over the first three weeks of postnatal life. These data reveal the dynamics of CGN dendrite development that underlie construction of cerebellar circuits.
NOTE: All procedures were performed under protocols approved by Duke University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
1. DNA preparation for in vivo electroporation or IVE (1 day before surgery)
Figure 1: Limiting injection depth to 1.5 mm using a spacer. (A) A 11.2 mm segment is cut off a loading pipette using a razor blade. (B) The spacer is fitted onto the tip of the Hamilton syringe (total length is 1.27 cm or 0.5 in) and secured with either adhesive or parafilm. The exposed tip should be 1.5 mm in length. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
2. In vivo electroporation of granule neuron progenitors in seven-day old postnatal mice
NOTE: All electroporation surgeries were performed in a sterile and highly ventilated surgical suite, and all personnel wore complete personal protective equipment including gloves, face mask, hair bonnet, gown, and shoe covers. Alternatively, the surgeries can be performed in a ventilated and sterile hood.
Figure 2: In vivo cerebellar electroporation of granule neuron progenitors in P7 wildtype mouse pups. (A) Pups are anesthetized with 4% isoflurane delivered at a rate of 0.8L/min to ensure anesthesia throughout the injection of the DNA solution. Isoflurane is delivered at a rate of 0.8 L/min. (B) After sterilizing the mouse 3 times with betadine and 70% ethanol, an incision is made that spans the distance of the ears, revealing the hindbrain. (C) A magnified image of a white demarcation on the cranium, a landmark for the injection site. DNA construct should be injected within 1 mm above the mark; dotted lines outline the demarcation, and black arrow denotes the injection site. The ridges of the cerebellar vermis may be visible and can be useful for finding the injection site. (D) Tweezer-type electrode orientation for efficient electroporation. Plus (+) end must be oriented downwards to pull negatively charged DNA into the cerebellar parenchyma prior to administration of electrical pulses. (E) Test injection of 1 µL of a 0.02% Fast Green dye shows injection is localized to the middle of the cerebellar vermis between lobules 5-7. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. Immunohistochemistry of electroporated CGNs
4. Morphological analyses of CGNs - three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and surface area and cellular volume
Figure 3: Immunohistochemical analysis and three-dimensional reconstruction of electroporated granule neurons. P7 CD-1 mice were electroporated with a construct expressing GFP. Brains were collected and subjected to immunohistochemistry, confocal microscopy, and 3D-reconstruction for morphological analysis. (A) Timeline from electroporation to image processing of a 10-DPI mouse. (B) Maximum projection image of a sagittal cross-section of electroporated cerebellum 10-DPI; white lines demarcate cerebellar layers, and scale bar is 25 µm. (C) Maximum projection image of a single electroporated granule neuron 10-DPI and the corresponding 3D trace, scale bar is 10 µm. (D) 3D-reconstructions were generated using the FIJI plugin Simple Neurite Tracer. All measurements were traced through the z-stack, following the cell-fill signal. Shaft and claw measurements were traced separately for every dendrite; dotted line denotes portion of dendrite within the current plane. Abbreviations: 3D = three-dimensional; GFP = green fluorescent protein; DPI = days post-injection; PSD-95 = postsynaptic density protein 95; GNPs = granule neuron progenitors; PFA = paraformaldehyde. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Analysis of granule neuron morphology during cerebellar development. (A) Maximum projection images of electroporated CGNs from 3-DPI to 14-DPI (postnatal age P10 to P21), nuclei (blue) and GFP (green); arrowheads indicate individual dendrite, and scale bar is 10 µm. (B) Average number of dendrites. (C) Average dendrite le...
Cerebellar granule neurons are the most abundant neurons in the mammalian brain, making up almost 60-70% of the total neuron population in the rodent brain1,14. The cerebellum has been extensively utilized to elucidate mechanisms of cellular proliferation, migration, dendrite formation, and synapse development6,9,10,11,
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The work was supported by NIH grants R01NS098804 (A.E.W.), F31NS113394 (U.C.), and Duke University's Summer Neuroscience Program (D.G.).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Betadine | Purdue Production | 67618-150-17 | |
Cemented 10 µL needle | Hamilton | 1701SN (80008) | 33 gauge, 1.27 cm (0.5 in), 4 point style |
Chicken anti-GFP | Millipore Sigma | AB16901 | Our lab uses this antibody at a 1:1000 concentration |
Cotton-tip applicator | |||
Donkey anti-chicken Cy2 | Jackson ImmunoResearch | 703-225-155 | Our lab uses this antibody at a 1:500 concentration |
Ethanol (200 proof) | Koptec | V1016 | |
Electroporator ECM 830 | BTX Harvard Apparatus | 45-0052 | |
Fast Green FCF | Sigma | F7252-5G | |
FUGW plasmid | Addgene | 14883 | |
Glass slides | VWR | 48311-703 | Superfrost plus |
Glycerol | Sigma-Aldrich | G5516 | |
Heating pad | Softheat | ||
Hoescht 33342 fluorescent dye | Invitrogen | 62249 | |
Imaris | Bitplane | ||
Isoflurane | Patterson Veterinary | 07-893-1389 | |
Micro cover glass | VWR | 48382-138 | |
Nail polish | Sally Hansen | Color 109 | |
Normal goat serum | Gibco | 16210064 | |
O.C.T. embedding compound | Tissue-Tek | 4583 | |
Olympus MVX10 Dissecting Scope | Olympus | MVX10 | |
P200 pipette reach tip | Fisherbrand | 02-707-138 | Used for needle spacer |
Parafilm | Bemis | PM-996 | |
PBS pH 7.4 (10x) | Gibco | 70011-044 | |
Simple Neurite Tracer | FIJI | https://imagej.net/Simple_Neurite_Tracer:_Basic_ Instructions | |
Sucrose | Sigma | S0389 | |
Surgical tools | RWD Life Science | Small scissors and tweezers | |
Triton X-100 | Roche | 11332481001 | non-ionic detergent |
Tweezertrodes | BTX Harvard Apparatus | 45-0489 | 5 mm, platinum plated tweezer-type electrodes |
Ultrapure distilled water | Invitrogen | 10977-015 | |
Vectashield mounting media | Vectashield | H1000 | |
Vetbond tissue adhesive | 3M | 1469SB | |
Zeiss 780 Upright Confocal | Zeiss | 780 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved