JoVE Logo

Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

The adult mosquito salivary gland (SG) is required for the transmission of all mosquito-borne pathogens to their human hosts, including viruses and parasites. This video demonstrates efficient isolation of the SGs from the larval (L4) stage Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes and preparation of the L4 SGs for further analysis.

Abstract

Mosquito salivary glands (SGs) are a requisite gateway organ for the transmission of insect-borne pathogens. Disease-causing agents, including viruses and the Plasmodium parasites that cause malaria, accumulate in the secretory cavities of SG cells. Here, they are poised for transmission to their vertebrate hosts during a subsequent blood meal. As adult glands form as an elaboration of larval SG duct bud remnants that persist beyond early pupal SG histolysis, the larval SG is an ideal target for interventions that limit disease transmission. Understanding larval SG development can help develop a better understanding of its morphology and functional adaptations and aid in the assessment of new interventions that target this organ. This video protocol demonstrates an efficient technique for isolating, fixing, and staining larval SGs from Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Glands dissected from larvae in a 25% ethanol solution are fixed in a methanol-glacial acetic acid mixture, followed by a cold acetone wash. After a few rinses in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), SGs can be stained with a broad array of marker dyes and/or antisera against SG-expressed proteins. This method for larval SG isolation could also be used to collect tissue for in situ hybridization analysis, other transcriptomic applications, and proteomic studies.

Introduction

Malaria is a major public health threat causing almost 230 million infections and an estimated 409,000 deaths in 20191. The majority of deaths are in sub-Saharan Africa and are caused by the parasite Plasmodium falciparum, whose insect vector is Anopheles gambiae, the subject of this video demonstration. Although the numbers indicate a significant drop in annual death rate since the turn of the century (>300,000 fewer annual deaths), the promising decreases in disease rates observed from 2000 to 2015 are tapering, suggesting the need for new approaches to limiting disease transmission2. Among promising additional strategies for controlling and possibly eliminating malaria is targeting mosquito vector capacity using CRISPR/Cas9-based gene-editing and gene-drive3,4,5. Indeed, it is the targeting of the mosquito vector (through the expanded use of long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets) that has had the greatest impact on reducing disease transmission6.

Female mosquitoes acquire Plasmodium gametocytes from an infected human during a blood meal. Following fertilization, maturation, midgut epithelium traversal, population expansion, and hemocoel navigation in their obligate mosquito hosts, hundreds to tens of thousands of Plasmodium sporozoites invade the mosquito SGs and fill the secretory cavities of the constituent secretory cells. Once inside the secretory cavities, the parasites have direct access to the salivary duct and are thus poised for transmission to a new vertebrate host upon the next blood meal. Because SGs are critical for the transmission of malaria-causing sporozoites to their human hosts, and laboratory studies suggest that SGs are not essential for blood-feeding, mosquito survival, or fecundity7,8,9, they represent an ideal target for transmission-blocking measures. Adult mosquito SGs form as an elaboration of "duct bud" remnants in the larval SGs that persist beyond early pupal SG histolysis10, making the larval SG an ideal target for interventions to limit adult-stage disease transmission.

Characterizing the larval stage of SG development can help develop not only a better understanding of its morphology and functional adaptations but can also aid in assessing new interventions that target this organ through gene editing of key SG regulators. Because all previous studies of larval salivary gland architecture predate immunostaining and modern imaging techniques10,11, we have developed a protocol for isolating and staining salivary glands with a variety of antibodies and cell markers12. This video demonstrates this approach to the extraction, fixation, and staining of larval SGs from Anopheles gambiae L4 larvae for confocal imaging.

Protocol

1. Preparation of solutions and tools

  1. Preparation of dissection solution
    1. To prepare dissecting solution, add 2.5 mL of 100% ethanol to 7.5 mL of distilled H2O in a 15 plastic tube. Invert the tube 3 times to mix.
      NOTE: This solution can be stored at room temperature for several weeks.
  2. Preparation of 10x phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) stock
    1. To prepare 10x PBS stock, add 17.8 g Na2HPO4• 2H2O, 2.4 g KH2PO4, 80 g NaCl, and 2 g KCl to 800 mL of deionized water. Mix with a stir bar on a stir plate until the solids have fully dissolved. Adjust the final volume to 1 L with purified water.
      NOTE: This solution can be stored at room temperature for several months.
  3. Preparation of 1x PBS
    1. Add 10 mL of 10x PBS to 90 mL of H2O in a sterile glass bottle. Close the lid tightly and invert 3x to mix.
      NOTE: The solution can be stored at 4 °C for several weeks.
  4. Preparation of fixative.
    1. Add 600 µL of methanol to 200 µL of glacial acetic acid. Make the solution fresh each time.
  5. Construction of putty plate (a tissue culture dish filled with silicone rubber)
    1. Mix the components (1:50) of epoxy (1 g) and water (50 mL) and pour the mixture into a Petri dish. Wait for the components to dry before using.
      NOTE: Once constructed, the putty plate can be used for years.

2. Gland dissection (Figure 1A)

  1. Collect late-stage L4 larvae (~10 days post hatch; Figure 2) from feeding trays using a plastic transfer pipette.
    NOTE: See this helpful online manual for standard mosquito husbandry and larval culture13.
    1. Place a putty plate on the stage of a dissecting microscope and transfer larvae onto the putty plate.
      NOTE: When aliquoting larvae for initial dissection, it is helpful to transfer ~10 larvae onto the slide at one time using a plastic transfer pipette.
  2. Place a drop of dissection solution (1:3 EtOH:H2O) onto the putty plate, separate from the 10 larvae.
  3. Use a plastic transfer pipette or disposable glass pipette to place one L4 larva into the 25% EtOH drop.
  4. Take forceps (#5), one in each hand, and with the non-dominant hand, grip the head of the larva. Using the dominant hand, grasp the larva with forceps just below the head and gently pull with minimal constant force, such that the head detaches from the rest of the body and the glands remain attached to the head. Discard the body portion of the larva carcass.
    NOTE: When dissecting, set a paper towel nearby to collect the larvae carcasses.
  5. Collect the head/glands into 1 mL of 1x PBS in a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube. Use 1 mL of PBS for ~40 dissected glands with their attached heads. Wait for the heads/SGs to sink to the bottom of the buffer.

3. Fixation for antibody staining (Figure 1B)

  1. Drain the PBS starting from the top of the microcentrifuge tube using a glass transfer pipette, avoiding the sticky mosquito tissues and removing as much of the PBS solution as possible without damaging the tissues. Replace the solution with 800 µL of a 3:1 mixture of methanol to glacial acetic acid. Place the tube at 4 °C overnight (12-24 h recommended; 19 h preferred).
  2. The following day, drain the solution and replace it with 1 mL of cold 100% acetone. Leave for 90 s.
  3. Remove the acetone and gently rinse the tissues three times with 1 mL of 1x PBS each time.
    NOTE: The samples should float slowly up with the flow, then fall back to the bottom of the tube by the time each PBS addition is complete.

4. Immunostaining (Figure 1B)

  1. Add primary antibody (e.g., Rab11) at the appropriate dilution (1:100) in 200 µL of the total volume of 1x PBS. Swirl the tube contents gently with a pipette tip. Incubate overnight at 4 °C.
  2. Remove the primary antibody solution and wash three times with 1 mL of 1x PBS (gently pipetting the solution in and out of the pipette).
  3. Add secondary antibody (Alex Fluor 488 Goat anti-Rabbit) at the appropriate dilution (1:200) in 200 µL of total volume. Swirl the tube contents gently with a pipette tip. Incubate at room temperature for 90 min.
  4. Add dyes, such as Nile Red (lipids, 5 µL of 1 µg/µL) and/or Hoechst (DNA, 3 µL of 1 µg/µL), into 200 µL of PBS at this stage. Incubate at room temperature for an additional 60 min. Wash gently three times with 1x PBS.

5. Mounting stained glands for microscopy (Figure 1C)

  1. Pipette 200 µL of 100% glycerol onto a microscope slide.
    NOTE: As glycerol is viscous, leave the pipette tip in the liquid until it reaches the appropriate volume. No tissue shrinking was observed when going straight into 100% glycerol. However, researchers can go through 30% and 50% glycerol washes in the tubes before moving the samples into 100% glycerol.
  2. Transfer the stained heads (up to 20 per slide) with the attached glands (along with other internal structures) to the microscope slide using a soft brush (Figure 3A). Spread the samples out so that they are evenly distributed along the glass slide.
    NOTE: When depositing glands on a cover slide with a brush, forceps can be used to gently orient the SGs so that they are all oriented in the same direction.
  3. Viewing under a dissecting microscope, separate the larval head from the glands using two pairs of forceps and carefully pulling the two tissues in opposite directions.
    NOTE: As it is challenging to completely isolate the SGs, simply remove the heads, leaving the SGs and associated internal structures. Even if the SGs remain associated with other tissues, they are easily recognized when stained with Hoechst and other markers (Figure 3B,C).
  4. Remove and discard the heads and repeat the separation process for each SG.
    NOTE: When removing heads, set a paper towel nearby to collect them.
  5. Gently place a 1.5 mm thick coverslip on the top (avoiding air bubbles) and seal with clear nail polish.
  6. Store at 4 °C in a light-proof container.
    NOTE: Prepared slides of stained glands can be kept at 4 °C in the dark for up to six months to one year without any notable changes in quality. If glycerol starts to leak as the months go by, gently lift the coverslip and pipette in more glycerol to fill holes.

Results

Salivary glands are relatively easy to dissect from all stage 4 larvae. Male and female larvae can be distinguished at the late L4 larval stage by a red stripe along the dorsal thorax of females but not males (Figure 2). We also observe that antennal morphology is much more elaborate in male than in female L4 larvae (Figure 2), similar to the differences observed in this structure in adult mosquitoes. Along with the considerable overall growth during the L4 stag...

Discussion

The protocol described herein was adapted from a Drosophila SG dissection protocol and an adult mosquito dissection protocol14,15,16. However, most markers did not penetrate the basement membrane (data not shown) when using the adult dissection and SG staining methods. Adaptations of the adult protocol included dissecting the glands in a 25% EtOH solution, washing the glands with a combination of MeOH and glacial acetic acid, an...

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute for access to and rearing of An. gambiae larvae.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
 KH2PO4Millipore SigmaP9791
 Na2HPO4 • 2H2OMillipore Sigma71643
 NaClMillipore SigmaS7653
AcetoneMillipore Sigma179124
Brush with soft bristlesAmazon (SN NJDF) Detail Paint Brush SetB08LH63D89
Cover slips (22 x 50 mm)VWR48393-195
DAPI (DNA)ThermoFisher ScientificD1306
Ethyl alcohol 200 proofMillipore SigmaEX0276
Gilson Pipetman P200 PipetteGilsonP200
Glacial Acetic AcidSigma Aldrich695092
Jewelers forceps, Dumont No. 5Millipore SigmaF6521
KClMillipore Sigma58221
MethanolMillipore Sigma1414209
Nail polishAmazon (Sally Hansen)B08148YH9M
Nile Red (lipid)ThermoFisher ScientificN1142
Paper towels/wipesULINES-7128
Petri plate (to make putty plate)ThermoFisher ScientificFB0875712
Pipette TipsGilsonTips E200ST
Plastic Transfer PipetteFisher ScientificS304671
Primary antibodies (e.g., Crb, Rab11)Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB); Andrew LabMouse anti-Crb (Cq4) or Rabbit anti-Rab11
Secondary antibodies with fluorescent tags (e.g., Alexa Fluor 488 Goat-anti Rabbit)ThermoFisher ScientificA11008
Silicone resin and curing agent for putty plateDow Chemicals - Ximeter SiliconePMX-200
Slides, frosted on one end for labellingVWR  20 X 50 mm48393-195
Wheat Germ AgglutininThermoFisher ScientificW834

References

  1. World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges. World Health Organization Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/337660 (2020)
  2. Feachem, R. G. A., et al. Malaria eradication within a generation: ambitious, achievable, and necessary. Lancet. 394 (10203), 1056-1112 (2019).
  3. Adolfi, A., et al. Efficient population modification gene-drive rescue system in the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Nature Communications. 11, 5553 (2020).
  4. Kyrou, K., et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Nature Biotechnology. 36 (11), 1062-1066 (2018).
  5. Rostami, M. N. CRISPR/Cas9 gene drive technology to control transmission of vector-borne parasitic infections. Parasite Immunology. 42 (9), 12762 (2020).
  6. Bhatt, S., et al. Coverage and system efficiencies of insecticide-treated nets in Africa from 2000 to 2017. Elife. 4, 09672 (2015).
  7. Mellink, J. J., Vanden Bovenkamp, W. Functional aspects of mosquito salivation in blood feeding of Aedes aegypti. Mosquito News. 41 (1), 115 (1981).
  8. Ribeiro, J. M., Rossignol, P. A., Spielman, A. Role of mosquito saliva in blood vessel location. Journal of Experimental Biology. 108, 1-7 (1984).
  9. Yamamoto, D. S., Sumitani, M., Kasashima, K., Sezutsu, H., Matsuoka, H. Inhibition of malaria infection in transgenic Anopheline mosquitoes lacking salivary gland cells. PLoS Pathogens. 12 (9), 1005872 (2016).
  10. Rishikesh, N. Morphology and development of the salivary glands and their chromosomes in the larvae of Anopheles stephensi sensu stricto. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 20 (1), 47-61 (1959).
  11. Jensen, D. V., Jones, J. C. The development of the salivary glands in Anopheles albimanus Wiedemann (Diptera, Culicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 50 (5), 40824 (1957).
  12. Chiu, M., Trigg, B., Taracena, M., Wells, M. Diverse cellular morphologies during lumen maturation in Anopheles gambiae larval salivary glands. Insect Molecular Biology. 30 (2), 210-230 (2021).
  13. MR4. Methods in Anopheles research. Center for Disease Control Available from: https://www.beiresources.org/Portals/2/ (2015)
  14. Wells, M. B., Andrew, D. J. Salivary gland cellular architecture in the Asian malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Parasites & Vectors. 8, 617 (2015).
  15. Wells, M. B., Villamor, J., Andrew, D. J. Salivary gland maturation and duct formation in the African malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Scientific Reports. 7 (1), 601 (2017).
  16. Wells, M. B., Andrew, D. J. Anopheles salivary gland architecture shapes plasmodium sporozoite availability for transmission. mBio. 10 (4), 01238 (2019).
  17. Clements, A. N. . The physiology of mosquitoes. , (1963).
  18. Imms, A. D. On the larval and pupal stages of Anopheles maculipennis, meigen. Parasitology. 1 (2), 103-133 (1908).
  19. Favia, G., et al. Bacteria of the genus Asaia stably associate with Anopheles stephensi, an Asian malarial mosquito vector. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 104 (21), 9047-9051 (2007).
  20. Neira Oviedo, M., et al. The salivary transcriptome of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) larvae: A microarray-based analysis. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 39 (5-6), 382-394 (2009).
  21. Linser, P. J., Smith, K. E., Seron, T. J., Neira Oviedo, M. Carbonic anhydrases and anion transport in mosquito midgut pH regulation. Journal of Experimental Biology. 212 (11), 1662-1671 (2009).
  22. Linser, P. J., et al. Slc4-like anion transporters of the larval mosquito alimentary canal. Journal of Insect Physiology. 58 (4), 551-562 (2012).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Anopheles GambiaeLarval Salivary GlandsDissectionImmunostainingMosquito LarvaeDisease TransmissionMorphological AnalysisPrimary AntibodySecondary AntibodyPBS phosphate buffered SalineAcetone FixationNile RedHoechst Dye

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved